In vivo quantification of the laxity of normal and unstable glenohumeral joints

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the magnitude of glenohumeral translation on clinical laxity tests could distinguish between clinically stable shoulders and shoulders with traumatic or atraumatic instability. Subjects included eight male volunteers with no history of symptoms of glenohumeral instability, eight patients with documented traumatic anterior instability and Bankart lesions, and eight patients with documented atraumatic multidirectional instability. The patients in the two instability groups had disabling instability that was refractory to nonoperative management and thus met the indications for surgical repair. All subjects were examined by an experienced shoulder surgeon using five standard manual tests: anterior drawer, posterior drawer, sulcus, push-pull, and fulcrum. The glenohumeral translations occurring during these laxity tests were quantitated with a spatial sensing system that had six degrees of freedom and was rigidly fixed to the scapula and humerus. The result showed substantial overlap in the translations found in members of the three groups for each of the laxity tests. Standard laxity tests demonstrate considerable translation in normal glenohumeral joints and do not reliably differentiate normal shoulders from those with two common forms of glenohumeral instability. This study suggests that assessment of the magnitude of glenohumeral translation on clinical laxity tests is not a specific test for the diagnosis of glenohumeral instability. Healthy subjects without symptoms may have as much translation as patients needing surgical repair for symptomatic shoulder instability. The need for and the type of surgical reconstruction for the unstable shoulder must be based on the patient's history and on duplication of the symptoms of instability on directed physical examination rather than on the magnitude of glenohumeral translation.     

Functional outcomes of early arthroscopic bankart repair in adolescents aged 11 to 18 years

Recurrent shoulder instability can significantly affect a patient's quality of life and place them at risk for extensive soft tissue and bony injury with repeated dislocations. Literature on the operative management of recurrent instability in pediatric patients is limited, as most studies include pediatric patients within a larger sample group comprised primarily of adults. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the role of early arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) after anterior shoulder dislocation or subluxation in a pure pediatric population. We retrospectively reviewed 32 consecutive ABRs in 30 pediatric patients. Sixteen shoulders failed initial nonoperative therapy before ABR, whereas surgical stabilization was the primary treatment in 16 shoulders after initial evaluation at our institution. There were 17 males and 13 females with an average age of 15.4 years (age range, 11-18 years). The average follow-up was 25.2 months. Functional outcomes were measured using the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) score. In the initial nonoperative group, the average SANE score was 92.2. There were 3 shoulder redislocations in 2 patients (18.75%). In the 16 shoulders treated with ABR as initial therapy, the average SANE score was 91.8, and there were 2 shoulder redislocations in 2 patients (12.5%). We conclude that primary ABR is an effective treatment of traumatically induced shoulder instability in pediatric patients. Primary ABR limits multiple recurring shoulder dislocations that hinder a patient's quality of life and places them at risk for future negative sequelae.     

Arthroskopische, elektrothermisch unterstützte Kapselraffung des Schultergelenks

Objective

Stabilization of the shoulder through arthroscopic electrothermal-assisted capsulorrhaphy (ETAC) as a stand-alone capsular shrinkage procedure in patients with multidirectional instability or multidirectional laxity, with anteroinferior instability and as an adjunct procedure in selected patients with traumatic unidirectional instability. At the present time, the ETAC procedure should be considered developmental. It is anticipated that further clinical and basic science research will define the optimal patient population for this technique.

Indications

Patients with multidirectional instability, multidirectional laxity with anteroinferior instability or posteroinferior instability. Traumatic unidirectional instability as an adjunct procedure to other forms of stabilization (i.e., Bankart repair).

Contraindications

Previous shoulder stabilization (relative).

Surgical Technique

Standard shoulder arthroscopy using posterior/anterior portals with patient in either a beach-chair or lateral decubitus position. Radiofrequency probe of either a mono- or bipolar type inserted via cannula through anterior and/or posterior portal.

Results

A retrospective chart review of 50 patients (29 men, 21 women) with a total of 53 shoulders in a 1-year period revealed two complications and eight revisions. The majority of patients had anteroinferior instability with anteroinferior capsular redundancy. Quality of life, as measured bythe modified Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, resulted in a mean score of 73.8 (SD 17.8) out of a best possible score of 100.     

Glenohumeral joint instability in normal adolescents. Incidence and significance.

One hundred and fifty asymptomatic shoulders in 75 schoolchildren were studied. The shoulders were tested for instability and a hyperextensometer was used to assess joint laxity. Signs of instability were found in 57% of the shoulders in boys and 48% in girls; the commonest sign was a positive posterior drawer test which was found in 63 shoulders. A positive sulcus sign was found in 17 shoulders and 17 subjects had signs of multidirectional instability. General joint laxity was not a feature of subjects whose shoulders had positive instability signs.     

T-plasty modification of the Bankart procedure for multidirectional instability of the anterior and inferior types

Forty patients who had a diagnosis of multidirectional instability of forty-two shoulders had a modified Bankart operation in which a T-shaped incision was made in the anterior portion of the capsule, with advancement of the inferior flap superiorly and of the superior flap medially. All of the patients had been injured during athletic activities. Some degree of anterior labral injury was present in thirty-eight of the forty-two shoulders. Half of the patients had generalized ligamentous laxity. The patients were followed for an average of three years (range, two to seven years). Four patients had episodes of instability after the operation. Three had a single episode of posterior subluxation during throwing, one had recurrent posterior subluxation that subsequently was treated by posterior stabilization, and one had anterior subluxation while he was diving from a high board. The average loss of external rotation after the operation was 5 degrees with the arm at the side and 4 degrees with the arm abducted 90 degrees. Satisfaction of the patient was rated excellent for forty (95 per cent) of the shoulders, good for one shoulder, and fair for one shoulder. However, throwing athletes found that they were unable to throw a ball with as much speed as before the operation.     

Thermal Shrinkage for Shoulder Instability

Thermal capsular shrinkage was popular for the treatment of shoulder instability, despite a paucity of outcomes data in the literature defining the indications for this procedure or supporting its long-term efficacy. The purpose of this study was to perform a clinical evaluation of radiofrequency thermal capsular shrinkage for the treatment of shoulder instability, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. From 1999 to 2001, 101 consecutive patients with mild to moderate shoulder instability underwent shoulder stabilization surgery with thermal capsular shrinkage using a monopolar radiofrequency device. Follow-up included a subjective outcome questionnaire, discussion of pain, instability, and activity level. Mean follow-up was 3.3 years (range 2.0–4.7 years). The thermal capsular shrinkage procedure failed due to instability and/or pain in 31% of shoulders at a mean time of 39 months. In patients with unidirectional anterior instability and those with concomitant labral repair, the procedure proved effective. Patients with multidirectional instability had moderate success. In contrast, four of five patients with isolated posterior instability failed. Thermal capsular shrinkage has been advocated for the treatment of shoulder instability, particularly mild to moderate capsular laxity. The ease of the procedure makes it attractive. However, our retrospective review revealed an overall failure rate of 31% in 80 patients with 2-year minimum follow-up. This mid- to long-term cohort study adds to the literature lacking support for thermal capsulorrhaphy in general, particularly posterior instability.     

Humeral head retroversion in patients with unstable humeroscapular joints

Humeral head retroversion and shoulder rotation in both the frontal and scapular plane were studied in 34 patients with anterior glenohumeral instability. Twenty-two patients had traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations and another 12 patients had nontraumatic dislocations with generalized joint laxity. Patients with traumatic recurrent dislocations had a smaller than normal retroversion angle in the unstable shoulder. The angles were 26 degrees on the dominant side and 23 degrees on the nondominant side compared with 33 degrees and 29 degrees, respectively, in normal shoulders. The stable contralateral shoulder joint was clinically and roentgenographically similar to the normal shoulder. The patients with nontraumatic dislocations had increased rotation and smaller retroversion angles, irrespective of stability in the shoulder joint. The retroversion angles were 18 degrees for unstable shoulders on the dominant side and 15 degrees on the nondominant side. The retroversion angle of the stable contralateral joint in these patients was less in five of eight shoulders.     

A longitudinal study of patients with multidirectional instability of the shoulder with seven- to ten-year follow-up

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with multidirectional instability of the shoulder initially treated with rehabilitation exercises. Sixty-four patients were treated for atraumatic multidirectional instability of the shoulder between 1987 and 1990. Preliminary evaluation was performed 2 years after initiation of treatment, and final evaluation of the patients was performed at a mean of 8 years after initiation of treatment. At the preliminary evaluation, 5 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 59 patients, 20 had undergone surgical treatment for stabilization of their shoulder. Of the 39 nonsurgically treated patients, 19 continued to have significant pain, and 18 continued to have significant instability of their shoulder. Of the 59 patients, 28 subjectively rated their shoulder condition as better or much better after conservative treatment. At the final evaluation, 2 more patients were lost to follow-up, and 1 additional patient had had surgical treatment. Thus, of the 57 patients available for final follow-up, 36 had received nonsurgical care, and 21 had undergone surgical treatment. Of the 36 nonsurgically treated patients, 23 rated their shoulders as good or excellent with regard to pain, and 17 were good or excellent with regard to instability. By the modified Rowe grading scale, 5 of 36 patients had excellent results, and 12 had good results. The remaining 19 patients were rated as having poor results. Only 8 patients reported that their shoulders were free of all pain and instability. Overall, of the entire group of 57 patients evaluated between 7 and 10 years after initiation of care, 17 had a satisfactory outcome from nonsurgical management based on stability and Rowe scores, 23 had good or excellent results with regard to pain, and 20 subjectively rated their shoulders as good or excellent. This review revealed a relatively poor response to nonsurgical treatment of multidirectional instability in this population of young, athletic patients.     

The use of thermal capsulorrhaphy in the treatment of multidirectional instability

The purpose of this study is to report on our experience with thermal capsulorrhaphy in the treatment of multidirectional instability of the shoulder. Thirty-three consecutive patients (33 shoulders) with multidirectional instability were treated with arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy. Twelve patients had a history of traumatic dislocation. Three patients had been previously treated with open inferior capsular shift procedures. At a mean follow-up of 36 months (range, 24-40 months), results were available for 30 patients. On the basis of the UCLA rating scale, out of a possible 35 points, the mean preoperative score was 16.7 points and postoperatively it was 30.1 points, with 3 excellent, 20 good, and 7 poor results. Twenty-three patients (76%) were returned to full activity. In our experience the majority of patients with multidirectional instability were able to return to their previous occupations in the armed forces following thermal capsulorrhaphy. More information further defining the biomechanical pathology of capsular laxity and the specific role of electrothermal shrinkage in treating shoulder instability is needed.     

Intraoperative measurement of shoulder translation

Assessing laxity of the shoulder joint in patients who are under anesthesia is a standard procedure before arthroscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel instrument for quick and reliable intraoperative measurement of glenohumeral translation. Previous testing of various designs has resulted in a device secured by 1 pin in the acromion and 1 pin in the proximal humerus. These pins are interconnected by a sliding ruler that gives translation values in millimeter increments as the laxity tests are performed. Comparison between manual arbitrary approximation of laxity and instrumented translation measurements showed that manual testing is reasonably good for assessment of anterior and posterior translation, without, however, providing values of translation in millimeter increments. The low correlation between manual assessment and instrumented inferior translation measurements indicates that inferior translation is more difficult to approximate manually. The shoulder translation tester was used in 102 patients. The mean values for clinically stable shoulders (n = 58) were 5 mm for anterior translation, 5 mm for posterior translation, and 4 mm for inferior translation. The corresponding values in unstable shoulders were significantly higher than in the stable shoulders, especially in patients with multidirectional instability. We conclude that the shoulder translation tester is easy and quick to use. It provides quantitative values of translation and will thus contribute information for correct diagnosis, therapy, and documentation.     

Chronic finger joint instability reconstructed with bone-ligament-bone graft from the iliac crest

Five patients with chronic instability of digital joints presented with instability and functional disability. Two patients had ulnar collateral ligament damage of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint and another had chronic multidirectional instability due to radial collateral ligament, dorsal capsule and palmar plate laxity of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb. The fourth patient had a lax radial collateral ligament and palmar plate of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the little finger and the fifth had chronic laxity of the ulnar collateral ligament of the interphalangeal joint of the thumb. All were reconstructed with bone-ligament-bone graft harvested from the iliac crest. The graft was fixed with screws and joint stability was achieved intra-operatively in all patients. All patients achieved a stable joint with improved functional performance at final follow-up.     

Glenoid shape in atraumatic posterior instability of the shoulder

Glenoid shape is related closely to shoulder stability and its abnormality is thought to affect the humeral head position in shoulders with atraumatic instability. However, it is unclear how the glenoid shape in shoulders with atraumatic instability is different from the glenoid shape in normal shoulders. The current authors investigated glenoid shape of 45 healthy individuals (20 males and 25 females; average age, 22 years) and 20 patients with atraumatic posterior instability with multidirectional laxity (six males and 14 females; average age, 19 years) using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. The tilting angles of the glenoid bone were measured in five consecutive planes perpendicular to the long axis of the glenoid and cross sections were divided into three types (concave, flat, convex). In healthy individuals, the average tilting angles from the bottom to the top of the glenoid bone were 3.0 degrees +/- 3.6 degrees, 1.0 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees, -1.0 degrees +/- 2.0 degrees, -2.3 degrees +/- 3.9 degrees, and -6.9 degrees +/- 3.7 degrees anteriorly, and tilting angles of patients were -6.1 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees, -4.0 degrees +/- 3.6 degrees, -4.8 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees, -5.5 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees, and -7.5 degrees +/- 3.1 degrees. The type of cross section also was different on the bottom plane where the concave shape accounted for 78% of healthy individuals whereas it accounted for 0% of patients. The loss of tilting angles and concavity of the inferior glenoid would correlate with the direction of the head translation in posterior instability.     

Revision shoulder stabilization: 2- to 10-year results

We evaluated 43 patients who underwent revision shoulder stabilization between 1978 and 1992. Twenty-three shoulders in 23 patients had unidirectional anterior shoulder instability (group A), whereas 21 shoulders in 20 patients exhibited multiple directions of shoulder instability (group B). Within group A recurrent instability developed at a mean of 35.5 months after the initial stabilization. Recurrence was traumatic in 12 patients. Revision surgery included a Bankart repair in 19 patients (coupled with capsular shift in 15 and a Bristow in 1) and capsular shift alone in 4. Within group B recurrent instability developed at a mean of only 16 months after the initial stabilization and was traumatic in only 2 patients. Revision surgery included capsular shift in 11 patients, Bankart repair in 5, anterior/posterior graft reconstruction in 3, and posterior bone block in 2. All patients had significant capsular laxity. A Bankart lesion was found in only 24% of patients. The mean follow-up from revision was 77.3 months (range 24 to 196 months) in group A. The results were excellent in 8 patients, good in 7, fair in 4, and poor in 4. Three of the 4 failures, however, had undergone successful reoperation before follow-up, improving the number of good or excellent results to 18 (78%). In contrast, at a mean follow-up of 61.5 months, only 9 (39%) good or excellent results occurred in group B despite multiple reoperations. Four patients ultimately went on to have glenohumeral fusion. Revision shoulder stabilization is a reliable procedure for patients who have recurrent anterior instability; however, it is unpredictable in patients who have multidirectional instability, with surgical failure and reoperation occurring frequently.     

Open posterior stabilization for recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability

Open posterior capsular shift is used for posterior glenohumeral instability that has failed nonoperative treatment. Few series have fully evaluated the outcome after open posterior stabilization. The purpose of this series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome after open posterior stabilization of the shoulder. Preoperative and intraoperative factors were analyzed with regard to their impact on results. Forty-eight consecutive shoulders were identified that had undergone primary open shoulder stabilization by use of open posterior capsular shift. Of the shoulders, 4 were lost to follow-up, resulting in a study group of 44 shoulders in 41 patients. Shoulders were evaluated at a range of 1.8 to 22.5 years after surgery by use of the L'Insalata shoulder form, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and a subjective shoulder rating in 44 shoulders. Thirty-nine shoulders were evaluated by physical examination, and thirty-seven underwent radiographic examination. A recurrence of posterior instability occurred in 8 shoulders (19%). Of the patients, 84% were satisfied with the current status of their shoulder. The mean L'Insalata score was 81.25+/-17.8 points, the mean SF-36 physical component score was 50.81+/-7.87, and the mean mental component score was 53.82+/-7.55. Significantly poorer satisfaction and outcome scores were seen in shoulders found to have a chondral defect at the time of stabilization and in patients aged greater than 37 years at the time of surgery. No progressive radiographic signs of glenohumeral arthritis were seen up to 22 years after surgery. Open posterior shoulder stabilization is a reliable procedure for treating significant posterior instability without causing arthritic changes. Patients found to have chondral damage within the shoulder and older patients were found to have less success after stabilization.     

The effect of capsular venting on glenohumeral laxity

Anesthetized shoulders are frequently stable against forces applied during drawer and sulcus tests, even though the shoulder muscles are inactive and do not contribute to stability. This passive stability is also evident in the glenohumeral joints of anatomic specimens. The translational laxity of anatomic specimen shoulders was measured, and it was demonstrated that this laxity was substantially increased when air was admitted into the capsule. Eight shoulders, aged 57-87 years, including six contralateral pairs, were analyzed using a six degrees-of-freedom force transducer and a six degrees-of-freedom spatial tracker. Capsules were vented by admitting air ad libitum through an 18-gauge needle. Venting reduced the force necessary to translate the humeral head with respect to the glenoid fossa by an average of 15.3 N (55%) for anterior forces, 10.8 N (43%) for posterior forces, and 19.0 N (57%) for inferior forces. It is likely that passive stability will also be diminished by a similar mechanism in patients with intact but excessively lax capsules. The principle of limited joint volume should be considered and tested when investigating glenohumeral stability.     

The inferior capsular-shift procedure for multidirectional instability of the shoulder.

Thirty-eight patients (forty-three shoulders) who had disabling multidirectional instability of the shoulder were managed with an inferior capsular-shift procedure through an anterior approach. All of the patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The postoperative range of motion of the shoulders was well maintained. The mean forward elevation was 172 degrees; external rotation, 77 degrees; and internal rotation, to the level of the eighth thoracic vertebra. Four patients (four shoulders) had recurrence of symptomatic and disabling multidirectional instability, but thirty-nine (91 per cent) of the shoulders continued to function well with no instability. Nine patients (24 per cent) continued to have episodes of apprehension, which correlated with the residual inferior and posterior translations found at the postoperative physical examination. Thirty-four patients (thirty-nine shoulders) stated that they were subjectively satisfied with the status of the shoulder, but four patients, in whom the instability had recurred, were not satisfied. Thirty-seven (86 per cent) of the shoulders were judged to have been improved by the procedure, the initial postoperative stability had been maintained, and the result had not deteriorated with time. Six shoulders, however, including the four with recurrent instability, were thought by the patient to have deteriorated with the increased duration of follow-up. It was our experience that if non-operative treatment of multidirectional instability of the shoulder failed, the inferior capsular-shift procedure provided satisfactory objective and subjective results. Failures and recurrences of symptomatic instability occurred early in the postoperative period. There appeared to be no deterioration of the results with follow-up to seventy-one months.     

Operative results of the inferior capsular shift procedure for multidirectional instability of the shoulder

BACKGROUND: Neer and Foster previously described the inferior capsular shift procedure for treating multidirectional instability of the shoulder and reported preliminary results that were quite satisfactory. The purpose of our study was to perform a longer-term follow-up evaluation of the efficacy of the inferior capsular shift procedure for treating multidirectional instability of the shoulder. METHODS: An inferior capsular shift procedure was used to treat multidirectional instability of the shoulder in forty-nine patients (fifty-two shoulders). All patients had failed to respond to an exercise program. In this series, the operative approach (anterior or posterior) was based on the major direction of the instability, as determined by the preoperative history and physical examination and as verified by examination with the patient under anesthesia. In all of the patients, the inferior capsular shift was the primary attempt at operative stabilization. The repair consisted of a lateral-side (or humeral-side) shift of the capsule to reduce capsular redundancy and, when necessary, a reattachment of the avulsed labrum to the anteroinferior aspect of the glenoid. RESULTS: A redundant capsular pouch was seen in all of the shoulders in this series. In addition, detachment of the anteroinferior aspect of the labrum was found in ten shoulders and an anterior fracture of the glenoid rim was seen in two shoulders. At an average of sixty-one months (range, twenty-four to 132 months), results were available for forty-nine shoulders (forty-six patients). Thirty shoulders (61 percent) had an excellent overall result, sixteen (33 percent) had a good result, one (2 percent) had a fair result, and two (4 percent) had a poor result. Forty-seven (96 percent) of the forty-nine shoulders remained stable at the time of follow-up. Two of the thirty-four shoulders that had been repaired through an anterior approach began to subluxate anteroinferiorly again. None of the fifteen shoulders that had been repaired through a posterior approach had recurrent instability. Full function, including the ability to perform strenuous manual tasks, was restored to forty-five shoulders (92 percent). A return to sports was possible after thirty-one (86 percent) of the thirty-six procedures done in athletes; however, a return to the premorbid level of participation was possible after only twenty-five (69 percent) of the thirty-six procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The results in this series demonstrate the efficacy and the durability of the results of the inferior capsular shift procedure for the treatment of shoulders with multidirectional instability. The procedure directly addresses the major pathological feature - a redundant joint capsule. Similar results were seen with either an anterior or a posterior approach, and we continue to approach shoulders with multidirectional instability on the side of greatest instability. A postoperative brace was reserved for patients in whom a posterior approach had been used or in whom an anterior approach had involved extensive posterior capsular dissection (ten of the thirty-four shoulders treated with the anterior approach).     

Ultrasonic measurement of the anterior translation in the shoulder joint

A new method for measuring the anterior translation in the shoulder joint by dynamic ultrasound was evaluated. We placed a 3.5-MHz transducer on the shoulder anteriorly. By using 3 bony landmarks, we then measured the anterior translation of the humeral head with a force of 90 N applied posteriorly. We performed such measurements in 20 subjects with healthy shoulders and in 20 patients with unilateral shoulder instability. There was a mean translation of 1.9 mm in healthy shoulders and 4.9 mm in unstable shoulders (P < .01). The mean difference between the 2 sides in subjects with normal shoulders was 0.7 mm, whereas the mean difference in patients with instability was 2.8 mm (P < .01). The normal shoulders were examined by 2 examiners to determine the degree to which different examiners' measurements might vary. Although one examiner recorded higher values than the other, the new method seems suitable for measuring increased laxity in unstable shoulders.     

The effect of variation in definition on the diagnosis of multidirectional instability of the shoulder

BACKGROUND: There currently is a wide variation in the definition of multidirectional instability of the shoulder in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine if these variations influence the distribution of the diagnoses in a cohort of patients with shoulder instability. METHODS: A cohort of 168 patients who underwent shoulder surgery for instability of any type was studied. Statistical analysis was performed in two steps. First, the instability of the shoulder in each patient was classified with the use of four existing systems, and the number of patients classified as having multidirectional instability was compared among the classification systems. Second, the definition of multidirectional instability was modified so that the result of laxity testing was the criterion for making the diagnosis, and the changes in the distribution of patients with a diagnosis of multidirectional instability were analyzed. RESULTS: Classification with the four existing systems resulted in significant differences in the number of patients diagnosed as having multidirectional instability, with two (1.2%), seven (4.2%), thirteen (7.7%), and fourteen patients (8.3%) so diagnosed (p < 0.05). Modification of the definition of multidirectional instability so that it was based on laxity testing resulted in a wide variation in the number of patients diagnosed as having multidirectional instability; these numbers ranged from fourteen (8.3%) to 139 (82.7%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that variations in the criteria used for the diagnosis of multidirectional instability significantly affect the distribution of patients with that diagnosis. The use of laxity testing tends to result in an overestimation of the number of patients with this condition. This observation is important because the results of studies may vary if patients with traumatic instability are considered to have multidirectional instability on the basis of laxity testing. Investigators studying patients with multidirectional instability should carefully define the inclusion criteria that they used.     

The arthroscopic treatment of multidirectional shoulder instability: two-year results of a multiple suture technique

Nineteen consecutive shoulders in 19 patients were treated for multidirectional shoulder instability with an arthroscopic capsular shift. Indications for the procedure included complaints of pain, instability, or both that was unresponsive to a prescribed exercise program that stressed rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer strengthening. All patients had evidence of increased joint laxity on physical examination; 17 had a 2+ or greater sulcus test and 2 had 3+ laxity both anteriorly and posteriorly. Fourteen of the 19 patients were injured during athletic activity. All surgeries were performed in an outpatient setting. All the patients were evaluated at an average of 34 months postoperatively with a minimum follow-up of 25 months. Based on the outcome scale described by Tibone and Bradley, the average postoperative score was 91 out of a possible 100 with 13 excellent, 5 good, and 1 fair result. All but 1 of the athletes returned to their previous level of performance but none were elite throwers. One patient had recurrent anterior subluxations treated with a repeat arthroscopic capsular shift and was rated as good. The patient rated as fair had no improvement in her pain after surgery. One patient complained of a painful supraclavicular suture that resolved spontaneously. There were no neurovascular complications or infections. Visualization of intra-articular pathology was enhanced with the arthroscope and aided in the diagnosis of multidirectional instability. The described technique proved safe and effective in treating multidirectional instability and enabling athletes to return to their previous level of function.