One-stage anterior debridement,bone grafting and posterior instrumentation vs. single posterior debridement,bone grafting,and instrumentation for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare single posterior debridement, interbody fusion and instrumentation with one-stage anterior debridement, interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation for treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.

Method

From January 2006 to January 2010, we enrolled 115 spinal tuberculosis patients with obvious surgical indications. Overall, 55 patients had vertebral body destruction, accompanied by a flow injection abscess or a unilateral abscess volume greater than 500 ml. The patients underwent one-staged anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation (group A) or single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation (group B). Clinical and radiographic results for the two groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

Patients were followed 12–36 months (mean 21.3 months), Fusion occurred at 4–12 months (mean 7.8 months). There were significant differences between groups regarding the post-operative kyphosis angle, angle correction and angle correction rate, especially if pathology is present in thoracolumbar and lumbar regions. Operative complications affected five patients in group A, and one patient in group B. A unilateral psoas abscess was observed in three patients 12 months postoperatively. In one of them, interbody fusion did not occur, and there was fixation loosening and interbody absorption. All of them were cured by an anterior operation.

Conclusion

Anterior debridement and bone grafting with posterior instrumentation may not be the best choice for treating patients with spinal tuberculosis. Single posterior debridement/bone grafting/instrumentation for single-segment of thoracic or lumbar spine tuberculosis produced good clinical results, except in patients who had a psoas abscess.     

One-stage posterior debridement, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation in treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective case series

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical management by one-stage posterior debridement, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and instrumentation and combined posterior and anterior approaches for lumbar spinal tuberculosis, and determine the clinical effectiveness of the posterior only surgical treatment for lumbar spinal TB at the same time.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients who suffered lumbar tuberculosis were treated by two different surgical procedures in our center from May 2004 to June 2012. All the cases were divided into two groups: 19 cases in Group A underwent one-stage posterior debridement, TLIF and instrumentation, and 18 cases in Group B underwent posterior instrumentation, anterior debridement and bone graft in a single-stage procedure. The operation time, blood loss, lumbar kyphotic angle, recovery of neurological function and fusion time were, respectively, compared between Group A and Group B.

Results

The average follow-up period for Group A was 46.6 ± 16.7 months, and for Group B, 47.5 ± 15.0 months. It was obvious that the average operative duration and blood loss of Group A was less than those of Group B. Lumbar tuberculosis was completely cured and the grafted bones were fused in 10 months in all patients. There was no persistence or recurrence of infection and no differences in the radiological results in both groups. The kyphosis was significantly corrected after surgical management. The average pretreatment ESR was 60.7 ± 22.5 mm/h, which became normal (9.0 ± 2.8 mm/h) within 3 months in all patients.

Conclusions

Surgical management by one-stage posterior debridement, TLIF and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis is feasible and effective. This approach obtained better clinical outcomes than combined posterior and anterior surgeries.     

Surgical treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis with adjacent segments lesion via one-stage transpedicular debridement, posterior instrumentation and combined interbody and posterior fusion, a clinical study

Purpose

To investigate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of one-stage surgical treatment for thoracic spinal tuberculosis with adjacent segments lesion by internal fixation, transpedicular debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one patients (thirteen males, eight females) with thoracic tuberculosis whose lesions were confined to two adjacent segments were studied retrospectively. All patients were treated with one-stage surgical treatment by internal fixation, transpedicular debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale was used to assess neurological function. Thoracic Cobb angle was used to assess thoracic kyphosis. Operating time, blood loss, complications, neurological function, deformity correction and interbody fusion were investigated.

Results

Average mean operating time was 231.4 ± 31.9 min, and evaluated blood loss during operation was 880.2 ± 112.7 ml. All patients were followed up for 22–41 months postoperatively (average 29.8 ± 5.4 months). All patients had significant postoperative improvement in ASIA classification scores. The thoracic kyphotic angles were significantly decreased to 9°–25° postoperatively (average 16.7° ± 4.4°), and at final follow-up were 10°–27°(average 17.7° ± 4.4°). No severe complications or spinal cord injury occurred. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate recovered to normal within 3 months postoperatively in all patients. All patients got bony fusion within 6–9 months after surgery.

Conclusions

One-stage transpedicular debridement, posterior instrumentation and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach can be an effective and feasible treatment method for thoracic spinal tuberculosis.     

Surgical management for multilevel noncontiguous thoracic spinal tuberculosis by single-stage posterior transforaminal thoracic debridement, limited decompression, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation (modified TTIF)

Purpose

Multilevel noncontiguous thoracic spinal tuberculosis has rarely been reported in the literature. We present a retrospective clinical study of 14 patients with multilevel noncontiguous thoracic spinal tuberculosis treated by single-stage posterior transforaminal thoracic debridement, limited decompression, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation (modified TTIF) and determine the clinical effectiveness of such surgical treatment for MNTST.

Methods

Fourteen patients with multilevel noncontiguous thoracic spinal tuberculosis were treated with modified TTIF. The mean follow-up was 27.36?±?10.46?months (range 13–42?months). The kyphotic angle ranged from ?2° to 47° before operation, with an average of 19.21°?±?12.63°. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of patients upon admission ranged from 30 to 62?mm/h before operation, with an average of 46.43?±?10.77?mm/h. The Frankel Grade was used to evaluate the neurological deficits.

Results

The average ESR got normal (8.14?±?5.89?mm/h) within 3?months in all patients. The average kyphotic angle decreased to 8.07°?±?6.91° postoperatively. Mean deformity angle was measured as 8.79°?±?7.29° at the last visit. Solid fusion was achieved in all cases. Neurologic status of the 12 patients with preoperative neurologic deficit was 6 with grade D recovered to normal; 2 with grade B, both of them to grade D; 4 with grade C, 2 to grade D, 1 to grade E, and 1 still in grade C.

Conclusions

Modified TTIF can be an effective treatment method of multilevel noncontiguous thoracic spinal tuberculosis.     

Anterior versus posterior procedure for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis

Background:

Approach for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis has been controversial. The aim of present study is to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of anterior versus posterior debridement and spinal fixation for the surgical treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar tuberculosis.

Materials and Methods:

70 patients with spinal tuberculosis treated surgically between Jan 2001 and Dec 2006 were included in the study. Thirty four patients (group I) with mean age 34.9 years underwent anterior debridement, decompression and instrumentation by anterior transthoracic, transpleural and/or retroperitoneal diaphragm cutting approach. Thirty six patients (group II) with mean age of 33.6 years were operated by posterolateral (extracavitary) decompression and posterior instrumentation. Various parameters like blood loss, surgical time, levels of instrumentation, neurological recovery, and kyphosis improvement were compared. Fusion assessment was done as per Bridwell criteria. Functional outcome was assessed using Prolo scale. Mean followup was 26 months.

Results:

Mean surgical time in group I was 5 h 10 min versus 4 h 50 min in group II (P>0.05). Average blood loss in group I was 900 ml compared to 1100 ml in group II (P>0.05). In group I, the percentage immediate correction in kyphosis was 52.27% versus 72.80% in group II. Satisfactory bony fusion (grades I and II) was seen in 100% patients in group I versus 97.22% in group II. Three patients in group I needed prolonged immediate postoperative ICU support compared to one in group II. Injury to lung parenchyma was seen in one patient in group I while the anterior procedure had to be abandoned in one case due to pleural adhesions. Functional outcome (Prolo scale) in group II was good in 94.4% patients compared to 88.23% patients in group I.

Conclusion:

Though the anterior approach is an equally good method for debridement and stabilization, kyphus correction is better with posterior instrumentation and the posterior approach is associated with less morbidity and complications.     

One-stage posterior focus debridement,interbody graft using titanium mesh cages,posterior instrumentation and fusion in the surgical treatment of lumbo-sacral spinal tuberculosis in the aged

Purpose

Aged patients represent a high risk group for acquiring spinal tuberculosis, and it still remains a leading cause of kyphosis and paraplegia in developing nations. Aged patients often combined with cardiovascular and respiratory disease and single lung ventilation via anterior approach surgery could result in more post-operative complications. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and feasibility of surgical management of aged patients with lumbo-sacral spine tuberculosis using one-stage posterior focus debridement, interbody graft using titanium mesh cages, posterior instrumentation, and fusion.

Methods

From March 2009 and July 2012, 17 aged patients with lumbo-sacral spinal tuberculosis were treated with one-stage posterior focus debridement, interbody graft using titanium mesh cages, posterior instrumentation, and fusion. There were eight male and nine female with a mean age of 63.3 years (range: 60–71 years). The mean follow-up was 46.5 months (range 38–70 months). Patients were evaluated before and after surgery in terms of ESR, neurological status, visual analog scale (VAS), and lumbosacral angle.

Results

Spinal tuberculosis was completely cured and the grafted bones were fused in all 17 patients. There were no recurrent tuberculous infections. ESR became normal within three months in all patients. The ASIA neurological classification and VAS scores improved in all cases. The average preoperative lumbosacral angle was 20.6° (range 18.1°–22.5°) and became 29.4° (range 27.1°–32.5°) at final follow-up.

Conclusions

Our results showed that one-stage posterior focus debridement, interbody graft using titanium mesh cages, posterior instrumentation, and fusion was an effective treatment for aged patients with lumbo-sacral spinal tuberculosis. It is characterized with minimum surgical trauma, good pain relief, good neurological recovery, and good reconstruction of the spinal stability.

     

Surgical management by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation for lumbo-sacral tuberculosis in the aged

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical study efficacy and feasibility of 17 aged patients with lumbo-sacral tuberculosis treated by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation.

Methods

17 aged patients who suffered from lumbo-sacral tuberculosis were admitted into our hospital between March 2003 and October 2010. All of them were treated by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation. Then the clinical efficacy with statistical analysis was evaluated based on the materials on the lumbo-sacral angle, neurological status that was recorded by Frankel grade system, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), which were collected at certain time.

Results

The average follow-up period was 47.5?±?17.1?months (17?C71?months), In the 17 cases, no postoperative complications related to instrumentation occurred and neurologic function was improved in various degrees. The mean preoperative lumbo-sacral angle was 20.5°?±?1.7° (range 18.0°?C23.0°). The lumbo-sacral angle became 29.1°?±?1.5° (range 26.4°?C31.0°) postoperatively. The average pretreatment ESR was 57.4?±?16.8?mm/h (33?C95?mm/h), which got normal (9.2?±?3.1?mm/h) within 3?months in all patients. All patients got bony fusion within 6?C8?months after surgery.

Conclusions

One-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, and posterior instrumentation can be an effective treatment method for the treatment of lumbo-sacral tuberculosis in the aged patients.     

Two-stage surgical management using posterior instrumentation, anterior debridement and allografting for tuberculosis of the lower lumbar spine in children of elementary school age: minimum 3-year follow-up of 14 patients

Purpose

Various surgical methods have been described for the management of lumbar tuberculous spondylitis in the literature. However, there were few reports on the two-stage surgical treatment of lumbar tuberculosis in children of elementary school age. We present a retrospective clinical study of 14 patients with lumbar and lumbosacral tuberculous spondylitis treated by two-stage surgery (first stage: posterior instrumentation; second stage: anterior debridement and allografting). The purpose is to determine the clinical efficacy of such surgical treatment for lumbar tuberculosis in children.

Method

Our series was comprised 9 males and 5 females with an average age of 7.5?years treated with the abovementioned surgical procedure. All patients had lumbar and lumbosacral involvement with one patient having spondylitis at L2–3, three at L3–4, seven at L4–5, and three at L5–S1. All patients had single motion segment involvement. The Frankel scoring system was used to assess the neurological deficits. Frankel’s grade B in two patients, grade C in four and grade D in eight. The following data were followed-up for an average period of 50.1?months (42–64?months) in these patients: healing of disease, deformity correction and its maintenance, neurologic function, and spinal bony fusion.

Results

The average preoperative local deformity angle was ?13.8°, correcting to 3.4° postoperatively and 1.5° at the final follow-up. With the exception of one patient who received a D at the final follow-up, all cases obtained complete neurological recovery. No breakage and looseness of internal fixation was found. Bony fusion was achieved in all cases within 6?months postoperatively. There was no recurrent tuberculous infection.

Conclusion

Two-stage (posterior and anterior) surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the patient of elementary school age suffering from lumbar and lumbosacral tuberculous spondylitis, especially for the patients in poor general condition. The procedure has the advantage of minor surgical invasion, effective kyphosis correction and less complications.     

Thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis with psoas abscesses treated by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, posterior instrumentation, and postural drainage

Purpose

Retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy and feasibility of patients with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis with psoas abscesses treated by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, posterior instrumentation, and postural drainage.

Method

A total of 18 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis (TB), between February 2007 and February 2011, underwent one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, posterior instrumentation, and postural drainage. And the clinical efficacy was evaluated based on surgery duration time, the blood loss, the postural drainage of time, neurological status that was recorded by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, the fate of bone graft fusion, kyphosis angle, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP), which were collected at certain time.

Results

The average follow-up period was 34 months (range 18–48 months). 18 patients suffered from seriously neurological deficits pre-operatively, of which 16 patients returned to normal at final follow-up. The surgery duration time was 197 ± 37.9 min, and the blood loss was 815 ± 348.5 ml. The postural drainage of time was 7.2 ± 2.7 days. The psoas abscesses disappeared in all cases, within the time range of 6–9 months (mean 7.4 ± 1.2 months). All patients of the grafted bones were thoroughly fused, with a fusion time ranging from 4 to 12 months (mean 7.8 months). Kyphosis angle was 44.32 ± 7.26° on average pre-operative and returned to 11.72 ± 2.85° at 6 weeks after operation; kyphosis angle was 13.10 ± 2.39° at final follow-up. The values of ESR and CRP were significant declined at 6 weeks post-operative, and returned to normal levels at final follow-up.

Conclusion

With standardized anti-TB chemotherapy, thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis with psoas abscesses could be effectively treated by one-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar debridement, interbody fusion, posterior instrumentation, and postural drainage.     

Posterior transpedicular debridement, decompression and instrumentation for thoracic tuberculosis in patients over the age of 60

Aim

Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of the application of posterior transpedicular debridement with instrumentation and fusion to the treatment of over 60-year-old patients with thoracic tuberculosis.

Methods

Fifteen over 60-year-old patients with thoracic tuberculosis treated by posterior transpedicular debridement with instrumentation and fusion between August 2006 and November 2010, seven males and eight females in this study were reviewed, retrospectively. Their age ranged from 61 to 75 (mean age 63.4). The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 51?months (mean 30?months). The patients were evaluated based on vertebral body loss, kyphotic angle, fusion status of affected segment, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and Frankel’s classification.

Results

A solid fusion was achieved in all 15 cases. No postoperative complications, chronic infection, sinus formation or significant loss of deformity correction was noted in these patients. Moreover, VAS score was reduced and Frankel’s grade was recovered in all patients and there was no recurrence of the tuberculous infection.

Conclusions

Posterior transpedicular debridement with instrumentation and fusion is a feasible and effective procedure in the treatment for thoracic tuberculosis in patients over the age of 60.     

Posterior only versus combined posterior and anterior approaches in surgical management of lumbosacral tuberculosis with paraspinal abscess in adults

Purpose

To compare single-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, debridement, posterior instrumentation, and postural drainage (posterior-only surgery) with a combined posterior-anterior surgical approach for treatment of adults with lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis (STB) with paraspinal abscess and to determine the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of posterior-only surgical treatment.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with lumbosacral STB and paraspinal abscess were treated with one of two surgical procedures in our center from September 2003 to December 2012. Nineteen patients were treated with posterior-only surgery (Group A) and 20 were treated with combined posterior–anterior surgery (Group B). Surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospitalization, bony fusion rates, complication rates, neurological status, lumbosacral angle correction, and Kirkaldy-Willis functional outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results

The average follow-up period was 39.1 ± 12.0 months for Group A and 40.7 ± 12.4 months for Group B. Under the Frankel classification, all patients improved with treatment. STB was completely cured and grafted bones were fused within 5–11 months in all patients. There were no persistent or recurrent infections or obvious differences in radiological results between the groups. The lumbosacral angle was significantly corrected after surgical management, but loss of correction was seen in both groups. The average operative duration, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate of Group A were lower than those of Group B.

Conclusions

Posterior-only surgery is feasible and effective, resulting in better clinical outcomes than combined posterior–anterior surgeries, especially in surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications.     

Isolated posterior instrumentation for selected cases of thoraco-lumbar spinal tuberculosis without anterior instrumentation and without anterior or posterior bone grafting

Purpose

The aim of this prospective study is the analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of active thoraco-lumbar spinal tuberculosis treated with isolated posterior instrumentation without any posterior bone grafting or anterior inter-body bone grafting or anterior instrumentation.

Methods

The study was a prospective follow-up of 25 patients with active thoraco-lumbar spinal tuberculosis who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation with pedicle screws and rods. These patients had posterior stabilization of the involved segment of the spine without anterior or posterior bone grafting. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.3 years and the minimum duration of follow-up was 2 years.

Results

The mean kyphotic angle improved from 32.4° pre-operatively to 7.2° in the early follow-up period. Following a minor loss of correction during follow-up, the mean kyphotic angle settled at 11.5° at the time of final follow-up. Inter-body bony fusion was noticed at the final follow-up in all patients despite the absence of anterior bone grafting or cages.

Conclusion

Posterior instrumented stabilization followed by chemotherapy seems to be adequate for obtaining satisfactory healing of the lesions. Anterior inter-body bony arthrodesis occurs despite the absence of anterior bone grafts or cages. Careful patient selection is critical for successful outcome with this technique.     

A posterior versus anterior surgical approach in combination with debridement,interbody autografting and instrumentation for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis

Purpose  

The purpose of this study was to compare posterior and anterior surgical approach in combination with debridement, interbody autografting and instrumentation for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. These approaches were compared in terms of the operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, bony fusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, neurological status and the angle of kyphosis.     

Neurological recovery after posterior decompression surgery for anterior dural compression in paralytic spinal metastasis

Purpose

Paralysis in spinal metastasis is often caused by anterior dural compression, and anterior approach has been frequently chosen for decompression despite its dreadful complications. On the other hand, the effectiveness of posterior indirect decompression has not specifically established. The objective of the present study was to investigate the anatomical patterns of dural compression, and to clarify the effectiveness of posterior surgery for anterior lesions.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the anatomical patterns of spinal metastasis on MRI images and the neurological recovery in the paralytic patients who underwent posterior decompression and fusion surgery with intraoperative radiation therapy. The recovery rate was compared between those with an anterior or circumferential dural compression (A+), who were indirectly decompressed, and those with a posterior and/or lateral dural compression (A?), who were directly decompressed.

Results

A total of 135 cases were included in the study, and 81.5% had anterior dural compression (A+). In the A+ group, 88.2% of preoperatively non-ambulatory cases regained the gait. Full recovery was achieved in 50% of preoperatively ambulatory cases. These rates were not significantly different from those in the A? group. The rate of gait regain was diminished in the surgeries of the middle thoracic spine (T5-8).

Conclusions

Most spinal metastases cause paralysis by anterior compression; however, the result of posterior indirect decompression was similar to that of posterior direct decompression, although kyphosis negatively affected the result. Anterior decompression might not always be necessary for soft tumor compression as long as the adjuvant therapy is effective for the local control.     

The posterior surgical treatment for focal kyphosis in upper-middle thoracic spine

Purpose

To analyze the clinical characteristics of focal kyphosis in upper thoracic spine, and observe the outcome of the posterior corrective surgical procedures.

Methods

Thirteen patients of focal kyphosis were treated with posterior surgical procedures in our medical center. The kyphosis apex was above T6 in all cases. The surgical procedures performed in this study included pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in six cases and vertebral column resection (VCR) in seven cases. For each case, the kyphosis angle, curvature of lower thoracic spine, lumbar lordosis angle, cervical lordosis angle, pelvic parameters, and the sagittal plane balance of the spine were compared before and after surgery. Neurological function change was assessed based on Frankel grading system and oswestry disability index (ODI).

Results

The average follow-up time of this study was 28.3 months. The average kyphosis angle was reduced from 73.5º before surgery to 32.7º immediately after surgery, and remained at 33.5º at follow-up. The average ODI improved from 22.5 before surgery to 15.5 at follow-up. The neurological function improved after surgery in eight cases. There were two cases of transient neurological deficiency in the lower extremities after VCR procedure, who eventually recovered under postoperative care. One case had recurrent kyphosis due to implant failure after VCR procedure, and recovered after the revision surgery.

Conclusions

Although high risk needs to be warned, the corrective surgery for focal kyphosis in upper thoracic spine still can achieve satisfactory results. Given the comparative surgical results yet less complications, PSO seems to be a preferable procedure over VCR for kyphosis at this region.     

One-stage surgical treatment for upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis by internal fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via posterior-only approach

Purpose

To investigate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of one-stage surgical treatment for upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis by internal fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach.

Methods

Fourteen patients (eight males, six females) with upper thoracic tuberculosis whose lesions were confined to two adjacent segments were admitted to our hospital. Their ages ranged from 23 to 72 years (average, 50 years). The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale was used to assess neurological function. ASIA classification showed that preoperatively, one patient was grade A, two patients were grade B, eight patients were grade C, and three patients were grade D. All patients were treated with one-stage surgical treatment by internal fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by measurement of thoracic kyphotic angles using Cobb angle evaluation, determination of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), evaluation of ASIA impairment scale, and radiological examination.

Results

Operation time ranged from 70 to 135 min, (average, 110 min). Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 200 to 950 mL (average, 450 mL). All patients were followed up for 22 to 48 months postoperatively (average, 31.5 months). No sinus tract formation, cerebrospinal meningitis, or recurrence of tuberculosis occurred. All patients had significant postoperative improvement in ASIA classification scores. The thoracic kyphotic angles were significantly decreased to 12°–26° postoperatively, and at final follow-up were 13°–28°. The ESR recovered to normal within 6 months postoperatively in all patients. Bone fusion was achieved within 3–8 months (average, 5.5 months).

Conclusions

One-stage surgical treatment for upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis by internal fixation, debridement, and combined interbody and posterior fusion via a posterior-only approach can be an effective and feasible treatment method.     

Thoracoscopic interbody fusion with percutaneous posterior stabilization for thoracic and thoracolumbar injuries

Background context

Traumatic thoracolumbar discoligamentous injuries and partial burst fractures are commonly managed through posterior-only stabilization. Many cases present later with failure of posterior implant and progressive kyphotic deformities that necessitates major surgeries. Anterior interbody fusion saves the patients unnecessary long-segment fixation and provides a stable definitive solution for the injured segment.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of combined minimal invasive short-segment posterior percutaneous instrumentation and anterior thoracoscopic-assisted fusion in thoracolumbar partial burst fractures or discoligamentous injuries.

Study design

Prospective observational study.

Patient sample

Thirty patients with acute thoracic or thoracolumbar injuries operated upon between December 2007 and January 2009.

Outcome measures

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), clinical and neurological examination for clinical assessment. Plain X-ray for radiological evaluation.

Methods

Preoperative evaluation included clinical and neurological examination, plain X-rays, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Posterior short-segment percutaneous stabilization plus anterior thoracoscopically assisted fusion in prone position were done. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years (range 24–48 months).

Results

The mean age was 44 years. The commonest affected segment was between T10 and L1 (22 patients, 73 %). The mean total operative time was 103 min. The mean operative blood loss was 444 ml. Interbody fusion cage was used in 28 patients while iliac graft in two cases. Fusion rate at the final follow-up was 97 % (29 patients); one patient did not show definitive fusion although he was clinically satisfied. The mean final follow-up ODI was 12 %. The mean preoperative kyphosis angle was 22° improved to 6.5° postoperatively and was 7.5° at final follow-up. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Combined anterior thoracoscopic fusion and short-segment posterior percutaneous instrumentation showed good clinical and radiographic outcomes in cases of thoracolumbar injuries through limiting the instrumented levels and preventing progress of posttraumatic kyphosis.     

Anterior versus posterior approach in surgical treatment of tuberculous spondylodiscitis of thoracic and lumbar spine

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of anterior versus posterior surgical debridement and fixation in patients with thoracic and lumbar tuberculous spondylodiscitis.

Patients and methods

A total number of 42 patients with tuberculous spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine treated surgically were included in this study. Twenty patients (group A) underwent anterior debridement, decompression and instrumentation by anterior approach. Twenty-two patients (group B) were operated by posterolateral (extracavitary) decompression and posterior instrumentation. Operative parameters, clinical, radiographic and functional results for the two groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

The average follow-up period was 15 months (range 12–24) in both groups. The average operative time, blood loss and blood transfusion of anterior group were significantly less than the posterior one. There was significant better back pain relief, kyphotic angle correction and less angle loss in the posterior group than anterior. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding neurological recovery, functional outcome and fusion rate.

Conclusion

Both anterolateral and posterolateral approaches are sufficient for achieving the goals of surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar Pott’s disease but posterolateral approach allows significant better kyphotic angle correction, less angle loss, better improvement in back pain but unfortunately more operative time and blood loss.

     

One-stage surgical management for tuberculosis of the upper cervical spine by posterior debridement, short-segment fusion, and posterior instrumentation in children

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical study efficacy and feasibility of 11 children with tuberculosis of the upper cervical spine treated by one-stage posterior debridement, short-segment fusion, and posterior instrumentation.

Methods

Eleven children who suffered from tuberculosis of the upper cervical spine were admitted to our hospital between June 2005 and December 2010. All of them were treated by one-stage posterior debridement, short-segment fusion, and posterior instrumentation. Then, the clinical efficacy was evaluated using statistical analysis based on the materials about the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of pain, JOA scores of nerve function and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), which were collected at certain time.

Results

The average follow-up period was 28.1 ± 10.5 months (13–42 months). In the 11 cases, no postoperative complications related to instrumentation occurred and neurologic function was improved in various degrees. The average pretreatment ESR was 58.4 ± 4.9 mm/h (53–69 mm/h), which got normal (8.9 ± 6.5 mm/h) within 3 months in all patients. The average preoperative VAS was 7.4 ± 2.2, which decreased to 1.6 ± 1.8 postoperatively. Mean preoperative JOA was 11.2 ± 3.8, and the JOA at the last visit was 16.3 ± 1.0. All patients got bony fusion within 3–8 months after surgery.

Conclusions

One-stage posterior debridement, short-segment fusion, and posterior instrumentation can be an effective treatment method for the treatment of tuberculosis of the upper cervical spine in children.