Complex mutation patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor gene associated with variable responses to gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Mutational analysis was performed in the kinase domain (exons 18-21) of the EGFR gene on tumor tissues of 65 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received gefitinib monotherapy. The association between EGFR gene mutation, gefitinib treatment response, and the overall survival were evaluated. In total, EGFR mutations with complex patterns were identified in 32 tumors. The overall mutation rate was 49.2% (32/65). Twenty of the 32 patients were responders, 10 non-responders, and 2 not assessable. The most common mutation in non-responders was L858R. Gefitinib responsiveness was only significantly associated with EGFR mutation and adenocarcinoma. The median survival for responder (15.5 months) was much longer than non-responder (9.23 months), though the difference only had marginal significance (p=0.056). The difference of overall survival between patients with and without EGFR mutation was non-significant (p=0.7819), mainly due to the short survival of the non-responders with EGFR mutations (median survival=6.2 months). Our study revealed that the response to gefitinib treatment in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations could be quite variable even for the same EGFR mutation type. An analysis of the various EGFR mutations and the response patterns was also performed and compared with recently published reports on EGFR mutation and gefitinib responsiveness.     

Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with improved survival in gefitinib-treated chemorefractory lung adenocarcinomas.

PURPOSE: Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) confer a strong sensitivity to gefitinib, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined EGFR mutations at exons 18, 19, and 21 in tumor tissue from 68 gefitinib-treated, chemorefractory, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients from the United States, Europe, and Asia and in a highly gefitinib-sensitive non-small cell lung cancer cell line and correlated their presence with response and survival. In addition, in a subgroup of 28 patients for whom the remaining tumor tissue was available, we examined the relationship among EGFR mutations, CA repeats in intron 1 of EGFR, EGFR and caveolin-1 mRNA levels, and increased EGFR gene copy numbers. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had EGFR mutations, all of which were in lung adenocarcinomas. Radiographic response was observed in 16 of 17 (94.1%) patients harboring EGFR mutations, in contrast with 6 of 51 (12.6%) with wild-type EGFR (P < 0.0001). Probability of response increased significantly in never smokers, patients receiving a greater number of prior chemotherapy regimens, Asians, and younger patients. Median survival was not reached for patients with EGFR mutations and was 9.9 months for those with wild-type EGFR (P = 0.001). EGFR mutations tended to be associated with increased numbers of CA repeats and increased EGFR gene copy numbers but not with EGFR and caveolin-1 mRNA overexpression (P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of EGFR mutations is a major determinant of gefitinib response, and targeting EGFR should be considered in preference to chemotherapy as first-line treatment in lung adenocarcinomas that have demonstrable EGFR mutations.     

Influence of histological type, smoking history and chemotherapy on survival after first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The usual primary endpoint in clinical trials for first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer is overall survival. Second-line chemotherapy can also prolong overall survival. Non-smoking history has been associated with a treatment effect for epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) versus placebo for overall survival. We performed a retrospective analysis to identify prognostic factors for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel, and to examine the effect of second-line therapy on progression-free survival and overall survival. Ninety-eight patients (median age 61 years, 35 female, 74 adenocarcinoma, 68 smokers, 56 performance status 0) fulfilled our criteria, of which 75 patients (78%) received more than second-line therapy (docetaxel [54%] gefitinib [48%] erlotinib [4%]). For overall survival, smoking history and histology were significant prognostic factors. The 2-year overall survival rates were as follows: smokers, 17%; non-smokers, 52%, P < 0.0001; adenocarcinoma, 40%; other 15%, P = 0.0017. Multivariate analysis in patients who received second-line therapy showed treatment with EGFR-TKI was an independent predictor of overall survival. Smoking history and adenocarcinoma histology were prognostic factors for an improved outcome with carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Our study results suggest that the use of EGFR-TKI after first-line treatment may be associated with an improvement in overall survival.     

The efficacy of combination of EGFR TKIs and chemotherapy versus EGFR TKIs monotherapy for first-line treatment of NSCLC with EGFR mutation: A Meta-analysis北大核心CSCD

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Methods: Retrieval of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and other databases from the start of the database building to 2017 was conducted to search randomized controlled trial of EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy vs EGFR-TKI single drug first-line treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC. Meta-analysis was performed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: A total of 4 articles were included in this analysis, with a total of 353 patients. Compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy, EGFR-TKI in combination with chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.84, P= 0.001], as well as in subgroups of EGFR 19 deletion, L858R point mutation, age 5=65 years, performance status (PS) score was 1, female and never smoker (all P < 0.05). However, the combination group did not show significant differences in ORR and DCR compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy group [relative risk (RR) = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94-1.22, P = 0.282; RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.96-1.08; P = 0.531]. The combined regimen caused more fatigue, nausea and leukopenia (RR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.32-5.25, P = 0.006; RR = 6.87, 95% CI: 3.06-15.45, P < 0.001; RR = 10.02, 95% CI: 3.18-31.55, P < 0.001). There were no differences in adverse reactions more than grade 3 between two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy can prolong the PFS compared with EGFR-TKI alone for the first-line treatment of NSCLC with EGFR mutation, and the adverse reactions were tolerable. Copyright © 2018 by TUMOR. All rights reserved.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and gene amplification in non-small-cell lung cancer: molecular analysis of the IDEAL/INTACT gefitinib trials.

PURPOSE: Most cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with dramatic responses to gefitinib have specific activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), but the predictive value of these mutations has not been defined in large clinical trials. The goal of this study was to determine the contribution of molecular alterations in EGFR to response and survival within the phase II (IDEAL) and phase III (INTACT) trials of gefitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the frequency of EGFR mutations in lung cancer specimens from both the IDEAL and INTACT trials and compared it with EGFR gene amplification, another genetic abnormality in NSCLC. RESULTS: EGFR mutations correlated with previously identified clinical features of gefitinib response, including adenocarcinoma histology, absence of smoking history, female sex, and Asian ethnicity. No such association was seen in patients whose tumors had EGFR amplification, suggesting that these molecular markers identify different biologic subsets of NSCLC. In the IDEAL trials, responses to gefitinib were seen in six of 13 tumors (46%) with an EGFR mutation, two of seven tumors (29%) with amplification, and five of 56 tumors (9%) with neither mutation nor amplification (P = .001 for either EGFR mutation or amplification v neither abnormality). Analysis of the INTACT trials did not show a statistically significant difference in response to gefitinib plus chemotherapy according to EGFR genotype. CONCLUSION: EGFR mutations and, to a lesser extent, amplification appear to identify distinct subsets of NSCLC with an increased response to gefitinib. The combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy does not improve survival in patients with these molecular markers.     

Combination of chemotherapy and gefitinib as first‐line treatment for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and sensitive EGFR mutations: A randomized controlled trial

To explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients who harbor sensitive EGFR mutations, a head‐to‐head study was performed to compare chemotherapy and gefitinib in combination or with either agent alone as first‐line therapy, in terms of efficacy and safety. A total of 121 untreated patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who harbored sensitive EGFR mutations were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin, pemetrexed plus carboplatin or gefitinib alone. The progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients in the combination group (17.5 months, 95% CI, 15.3–19.7) was longer than that of patients in the chemotherapy group (5.7 months, 95% CI, 5.2–6.3) or gefitinib (11.9 months, 95% CI, 9.1–14.6) group. The (hazard ratios) HRs of PFS for the combination group vs. chemotherapy and gefitinib groups were 0.16 (95% CI, 0.09–0.29, p < 0.001) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.29–0.78, p = 0.003), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) in the combination therapy group, chemotherapy group and the gefitinib group was 82.5%, 32.5% and 65.9%, respectively. The combinational strategy resulted in longer overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy (HR = 0.46, p = 0.016) or gefitinib (HR = 0.36, p = 0.001) alone. Our finding suggested that treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib could provide better survival benefits for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.     

Surgical resection after gefitinib treatment in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation

Gefitinib is the first approved epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed to respond to conventional chemotherapy. Gefitinib has fairly effective anti-tumour activity in patients with tumours harboring EGFR gene mutations. However, there has been no data about the preoperative gefitinib treatment in NSCLC patients. We reported here two cases of surgical resection of residual disease after dramatic response to gefitinib in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR gene mutation. Because both of our patients initially had advanced local tumour burden (bulky N2 disease), complete resection would not have been technically feasible. However, preoperative gefitinib treatment made it possible to achieve complete resection in both patients. We believe that clinical trials are required to evaluate the role of preoperative treatment of EGFR-TKIs in patients with locally advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR gene mutation.     

Elevated serum level of sialylated glycoprotein KL-6 predicts a poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib

PURPOSE: The factors affecting survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain to be fully elucidated, although epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a substantial prognostic factor. KL-6 has been studied as a useful indicator for interstitial lung diseases; however, it was first discovered as a lung cancer-related antigen. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the serum KL-6 levels in advanced NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib and thus determine its association with the EGFR mutation status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2002 and September 2005, 41 patients with NSCLC were treated with gefitinib after having their serum KL-6 levels measured at Okayama University Hospital. EGFR mutations were analyzed by direct sequence methods. RESULTS: The serum KL-6 levels ranged from 199 to 9080U/ml (median, 550U/ml), and 54% of 41 patients showed a level higher than the cut-off level of 500U/ml. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time and the median overall survival (OS) time were 4.7 months and 13.9 months, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the elevated KL-6 level was an independent adverse prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio: 2.278, p=0.040) as well as OS (hazard ratio: 4.858, p=0.002) in NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib. The EGFR mutation status was analyzed in 22 patients (54%). Among those with wild-type EGFR, the patients with high serum KL-6 levels also had a worse survival than those within normal serum KL-6 levels (6.5 months versus 13.3 months, p=0.0194). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that NSCLC patients with high serum KL-6 levels tended to have a poor clinical outcome when treated with gefitinib.     

Clinical significance of pretreatment serum amphiregulin and transforming growth factor-alpha, and an epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutation in patients with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer

Circulating amphiregulin and transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) have been found to be correlated with an unfavorable response to gefitinib based on the identification of patients with a higher probability of resistance to the drug. However, the association between an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) somatic mutation and the overexpression of its ligands has not been determined. To verify the clinical significance of the two serum markers and EGFR mutation status, we determined serum amphiregulin and TGF-alpha levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 93 patients with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer and EGFR somatic mutation status using the peptic nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid clamp method in 46 cases. The relationship between each independent clinicopathological variable and the response to gefitinib therapy was examined. We also evaluated the risk factors associated with prognosis. Fourteen (41.0%) of 34 progressive disease cases were positive for amphiregulin (P = 0.007). Eleven (32.4%) of 34 progressive disease cases were positive for TGF-alpha (P = 0.005). The median survival time of patients with the EGFR somatic mutation was significantly longer (P = 0.01). The same was true of amphiregulin- (P = 0.046) and TGF-alpha-negative patients (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, serum TGF-alpha positivity (hazard ratio, 2.558; P = 0.005) and the wild type EGFR gene (hazard ratio, 1.894; P = 0.003) were significant independent prognostic factors. Our study demonstrates that the status of the serum EGFR ligand, in addition to EGFR activating mutation, is a predictive factor for response to gefitinib therapy.     

Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib.

PURPOSE: Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been detected in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with sensitivity to treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. Our study explored the relationship between the two most common types of somatic EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletions and the L858R point mutation, and outcomes of patients following treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor specimens obtained before treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib were analyzed for EGFR mutations. Patients with exon 19 deletion or L858R mutations were identified. The response rate, time to progression, and overall survival were determined for the two groups. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients with NSCLC and an EGFR mutation who were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Patients with an exon 19 deletion had a significantly longer overall survival compared with patients with an L858R mutation (38 versus 17 months; P = 0.04). There were also trends toward higher response rate (73% versus 50%) and improved time to progression (24 versus 10 months) for the patients with an exon 19 deletion, although these were not independently significant in a multivariate analysis. A difference in response rate for patients treated with gefitinib compared with erlotinib was also noted [18 of 23 (78%) versus 3 of 9 (33%); P = 0.04]. No obvious difference in time to progression or overall survival was noted between gefitinib- and erlotinib-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCLC and EGFR exon 19 deletions have a longer survival following treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib compared with those with the L858R mutation. Pooling of greater numbers of patients and completion of prospective trials are needed to further define the predictive and prognostic roles of different EGFR mutations with respect to treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib, and other EGFR inhibitors.     

Prolonged survival of gefitinib treatment in patients with advanced and previously treated non-small cell lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival outcome in patients with advanced and previously treated non-small cell lung cancer given gefitinib (GEF) at our institution. We reviewed the clinical records of 70 Japanese patients,among whom 33 received several chemotherapy treatment modalities including GEF monotherapy (GEF group), and the other 37 were given several chemotherapy treatment modalities without GEF monotherapy (non-GEF group). The median survival time (MST) after second-line chemotherapy in the GEF group was 527 days with 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 59% and 26%, respectively. The MST in the non-GEF group was 175 days with 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 21% and 16%, respectively. Overall survival after second-line chemotherapy in the GEF group was significantly longer than in the non-GEF group (hazard ratio 1.93; 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.53, p=0.014). In our limited clinical experience, chemotherapy treatment including GEF monotherapy appeared to have longer survival than non-GEF treatment.     

Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in NSCLC patients

Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were identified by re-sequencing all exons of this gene to evaluate the frequencies of EGFR gene mutation and identify rare or novel EGFR mutations. A total of 55 NSCLC samples from 55 patients were included in the study. Genomic DNA was extracted and exons 1-28 of the EGFR gene were sequenced to identify mutations. The cDNA of the EGFR gene with P848L and T790M double mutants was constructed by introducing point mutations into the wild-type EGFR vector using a site-directed mutagenesis kit. Among the 55 patients with NSCLC, 8 patients carried mutations of the EGFR gene. Notably, of the mutation-harboring patients with a pathological type of adenocarcinoma, 6 were non-smokers. The in vitro study demonstrated that the P848L mutant had a similar response to that of the wild-type EGFR after gefitinib treatment, and the P848L and T790M double mutant exhibited high resistance to gefitinib. These EGFR mutations preferentially occurred in lung adenocarcinoma patients, most of whom were non-smokers. In the in vitro study, P848L mutant EGFR had a similar response as the wild-type EGFR to gefitinib treatment, suggesting that lung cancer patients with a rare mutation of EGFR, such as the P848L mutation, do not respond to gefitinib treatment.     

Long-term survival in three patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib

Gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), produces radiographic regression and symptom relief in patients with refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, it remains controversial whether gefitinib improves patient survival. We report three cases of refractory metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who have survived approximately 3 years since they first started gefitinib. These long-term survivors were Japanese female non-smokers with adenocarcinoma, who often had multiple lung metastases and were effectively re-treated with gefitinib. One patient had a surgical specimen available for DNA extraction and showed deletions in exon 19 of EGFR. Our experience suggests that gefitinib may improve long-term survival in selected patients. Further studies are required to identify biomarkers downstream of the EGFR mutations that are involved in multiple lung metastases and which could identify those patients who may benefit from gefitinib re-treatment.     

Gefitinib and epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are frequent in lung cancer of Asian ethnicity, female gender, non-smokers,and of adenocarcinoma histology. About 80% of the patients with EGFR mutations respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) including gefitinib and erlotinib, while only 10% of those without EGFR mutations do so. Therefore, EGFR mutation is being recognized as one of the most reliable predictive factors in gefitinib treatment. Another important issue in clinical practice is fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with gefitinib treatment, especially for Asian patients. A nested case-control study recently conducted in Japan identified some risk factors which cause ILD. About half of the acquired resistance to gefitinib that almost always occurs during the course of gefitinib administration is reportedly caused by secondary mutation at codon 79 0 (T 79 0 M). EGFR-TKIs are not universally effective for lung cancer,but these drugs are effective in patients who have particular characteristics. Therefore, patients who would benefit from gefitinib therapy should be included in clinical trials. Based on this concept, phaseIII clinical trials comparing gefitinib monotherapy with standard platinum-based chemotherapy in lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations are ongoing.     

Clinical significance of serum hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor gene somatic mutations in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer receiving gefitinib or erlotinib

A study of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and serum hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) for their associations with response to gefitinib therapy and prognostic impact. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine levels of HGF in serum from 96 Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. The peptic nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid clamp method was used to determine their EGFR somatic mutation status. We evaluated the relationship between each independent clinicopathological variable and the response to gefitinib therapy and risk factors associated with prognosis. HGF-positive serum status (hazard ratio, 1.536; 95% confidence interval, 1.042-2.400; P = 0.0295) had a significant and independent negative effect on progression-free survival among patients with wild-type EGFR. We demonstrate that having HGF-positive serum is predictive of a negative response to gefitinib therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who harbor wild-type EGFR.     

Gefitinib (Iressa) trials in non-small cell lung cancer

Gefitinib (Iressa) is a synthetic anilinoquinazoline capable of inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase in vitro at nanomolar concentrations. In phase I trials, gefitinib was well tolerated at doses above that required to induce antitumor effects in vitro. Notably, antitumor activity was observed in lung cancer patients. These findings resulted in the initiation of phase II trials employing gefitinib monotherapy in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (the so-called IDEAL trials). Study participants were randomized to 250 mg or 500 mg of gefitinib per day. Objective response rates between 10 and 20% were achieved with minimal host related toxicity (mainly acne like rash and mild diarrhea). Median survivals ranged between 6 and 8 months. Subsequently, phase III trials (the so-called INTACT trials) combined gefitinib and chemotherapy in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. These trials failed to demonstrate a survival advantage with the addition of gefitinib to standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. However, overall host related toxicities were not substantially worsened with the addition of gefitinib to chemotherapy. Further studies employing single agent gefitinib as well as regimens employing a different sequencing of chemotherapy and gefitinib are planned in recurrent and previously untreated lung cancer patients.     

Gefitinib is of more benefit in chemotherapy-naive patients with good performance status and adenocarcinoma histology: retrospective analysis of 575 Korean patients

We analyzed data from 575 patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib in National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea between 2002 and 2005. The overall response rate was 25.7% (95% CI, 22.1-29.6). At a median follow-up of 26 months, the median survival time from the date of gefitinib administration was 10.6 months with 1 year-survival rate of 47.7%. The median survival time calculated from the first diagnosis of advanced/metastatic disease or recurrent disease was 21.6 months. In a multivariate logistic regression model, adenocarcinoma histology, smoking history, performance status, and history of prior chemotherapy were statistically significant predictors for tumor response to gefitinib. The response rate of the most favorable subgroup, chemotherapy-naive never-smokers with adenocarcinoma, was 52.2% (95% CI, 42.6-61.7). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, performance status, adenocarcinoma histology, and history of prior chemotherapy were the independent predictors of survival (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.002, respectively). This retrospective analysis suggests that gefitinib was of great benefit for chemotherapy-naive patients who had good performance status and adenocarcinoma histology. These findings are required to be validated in further prospective clinical studies, which should include translational research characterizing the molecular predictors.     

Gefitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with advanced disease and their long-term prognosis remains poor, even after platinum-based chemotherapy. EGF receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapies, such as gefitinib, have been subject to comprehensive clinical development. Several Phase II and III trials have evaluated the clinical efficacy of gefitinib as monotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC, as well as both monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy in chemo-naive patients. A Phase III trial in heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC patients, 90% of whom were refractory, demonstrated some improvement in survival with gefitinib compared with placebo; however, the difference was not statistically significant in the overall population. A second large Phase III trial in patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC (INTEREST) demonstrated the noninferiority of gefitinib in comparison with docetaxel for overall survival together with an improved quality of life and tolerability profiles. As a result, gefitinib is expected to have a large impact in the management of pretreated patients with NSCLC.     

COX-2/EGFR expression and survival among women with adenocarcinoma of the lung

Previous studies suggest that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression may predict survival among patients with non-small cell lung cancer. COX-2 may interact with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), suggesting that combined COX-2/EGFR expression may provide predictive value. The extent to which their independent or combined expression is associated with prognosis in women with adenocarcinoma of the lung is unknown. In the present study, we examined relationships between COX-2 expression (n = 238), EGFR expression (n = 158) and dual COX-2/EGFR expression (n = 157) and survival among women with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Overall survival was estimated by constructing Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for other significant variables and stratifying by stage at diagnosis and race. Clinical or demographic parameters were not associated with either COX-2 or EGFR expression. Patients with COX-2-positive tumors tended to have poorer prognosis than did patients with COX-2-negative tumors [hazard ratio (HR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.78]. African-Americans with COX-2-positive tumors had a statistically non-significant higher risk of death than African-Americans with COX-2-negative tumors (HR 5.58, 95% CI 0.64-48.37). No association between COX-2 expression and survival was observed among Caucasians (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.30). EGFR expression was associated with a 44% reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98). COX-2-/EGFR+ tumor expression, but not COX-2+/EGFR+ tumor expression, was associated with survival when compared with other combined expression results. In conclusion, COX-2 and EGFR expression, but not combined COX-2+/EGFR+ expression, independently predict survival of women with adenocarcinoma of the lung.