Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the diagnostic performance of a combination of standard bolus-chase magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and MR angiography with time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) for depicting severity of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremity, including the pedal arteries, in diabetic patients with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ethical committee approved this study; written informed consent was obtained from patients. Standard three-station and TRICKS MR angiography of the calf and foot were performed in 31 consecutive diabetic patients (23 men, eight women; mean age, 67 years; range, 43-81 years). Two readers separately assessed images of arterial segments as diagnostic or nondiagnostic and graded stenosis. Results were compared with those at DSA when the corresponding arterial segments were considered diagnostic at DSA. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine if a significant difference between imaging techniques existed, and kappa statistics were used to determine interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The difference between standard MR angiography and DSA regarding the number of diagnostic segments in the thigh was not significant (P = .50). A significantly higher number of calf and foot segments was considered diagnostic at TRICKS MR angiography than at standard MR angiography (P < .025). Sixteen of 26 segments in the foot that were considered nondiagnostic at DSA were considered diagnostic at TRICKS MR angiography. Average sensitivity of standard MR angiography for depicting hemodynamically significant arterial stenosis was 84% (reader 1) and 83% (reader 2) in the thigh and 78% (reader 1) and 80% (reader 2) in the calf. For both readers, average specificity was 97% in the thigh and 90% in the calf. Sensitivity and specificity of TRICKS MR angiography in the calf and foot were improved compared with those at standard MR angiography. CONCLUSION: TRICKS MR angiography of the distal calf and pedal vessels is superior to standard MR angiography regarding the number of diagnostic segments and assessment of the degree of luminal narrowing.     

MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA

PURPOSE: To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MR angiography (i.e., contrast-enhanced MRA [CE-MRA]) of the pedal vasculature with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 patients with PAOD were prospectively examined at 1.5T. For contrast enhancement, 0.1 mmol/kg body weight of Gd-BOPTA were applied. MRA consisted of dynamic imaging with acquisition of six consecutive data sets. Acquisition time for each data set was 24 seconds, voxel size was 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.3 mm(3). A total of 20 out of 22 patient underwent selective DSA, two patients fine-needle DSA. DSA and MRA were performed within seven days. Image analysis was independently done by two observers with assessment of overall image quality, motion artifacts, detection of patent vessel segments of the distal calf and pedal vessels, and the number of patent metatarsal arteries. After four weeks, a consensus reading of DSA images was done. A second consensus reading of CE-MRA was performed after a further six weeks. RESULTS: Consensus readings of MRA and DSA revealed higher image quality and fewer motion artifacts for MRA (P = 0.021 and P = 0.008, respectively, sign test); interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.78) for image quality, and moderate (kappa = 0.46) for motion artifacts. There were no differences between CE-MRA and DSA in detecting patent vessel segments with a high degree of agreement (kappa = 0.89), and interobserver agreement for MRA was substantial (kappa = 0.89). Significantly more vessels were assessed as partially occluded on DSA than on CE-MRA (P = 0.004). There was a good agreement between DSA and CE-MRA for assessment of relevant vessel stenosis (kappa = 0.61); interobserver agreement for MRA was good (kappa = 0.65). CE-MRA detected significantly more patent metatarsal arteries than did DSA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRA is comparable to DSA for assessment of the pedal vasculature, and is able to delineate significantly more patent vessels without segmental occlusions and more metatarsal arteries than selective DSA.     

High-resolution multiphase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography compared with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for the identification of pedal vessels

PURPOSE: The authors prospectively evaluated optimized multiphase high-resolution (HR) Gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and standard two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography for their ability to delineate distal calf and pedal vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (20 limbs) with limb-threatening peripheral arterial occlusive disease underwent HR Gd-enhanced and 2D TOF MR angiography to identify targets for distal bypass. Imaging of the region of the ankle and foot was performed on a 1.5 T system with a head coil. A standard 2D TOF MR angiography sequence was performed first. The HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography sequence was then performed after injection of 0.01-0.2 mmol/kg of gadodiamide, allowing the acquisition of multiple consecutive coronal partitions, each in 18-25 seconds. Two experienced angiographers independently analyzed both studies. Comparison with intraoperative conventional angiography was available in 10 limbs. RESULTS: HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography allowed significantly faster imaging time (P <.0001) and larger coverage area (P <.0001) than 2D TOF MR angiography. All segments seen on 2D TOF MR angiography were visualized on HR Gd MR angiography, and significantly more suitable targets were seen well on HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography than on 2D TOF MR angiography (mean targets per limb: 3.9 +/- 1.9 vs 2.6 +/- 1.5, respectively; P =.02). In addition, HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography allowed better visualization of the arcuate pedal branch than 2D TOF MR angiography (P <.0001). Excellent correlation was demonstrated between HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography and intraoperative angiography in 29 segments (binary similarity coefficient, 0.90). A significantly higher percentage of artifacts adversely affected image interpretation with 2D TOF MR angiography than with HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography (14 limbs vs five limbs, P <.001). Artifacts on HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography included suboptimal mask in two limbs, venous contamination in one patient (two limbs), and motion artifact in one limb, although the studies remained diagnostic in all cases. CONCLUSION: HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography identified more distal target vessels with greater confidence than 2D TOF MR angiography. Optimized HR Gd-enhanced MR angiography may replace 2D TOF MR angiography as the gold standard examination for evaluation of distal runoff.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine feasibility of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the peripheral arteries from distal aorta to pedal arteries with a 1.0-T system and a dedicated phased-array coil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with peripheral arteriosclerotic occlusive disease underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography with an automatic moving-table technique. In addition, lower-leg and pedal arteries were examined without table movement (hybrid technique). Two radiologists independently reviewed MR angiograms to assess image quality and grade stenosis in 13 segments per leg. Each was blinded to patients' clinical data. Twenty-five of the patients also underwent conventional angiography. Stenosis grade at conventional angiography was assessed by two radiologists in consensus. Interobserver variability for stenosis grade at MR angiography was calculated with Cohen kappa test. Specificity and sensitivity of MR angiography in detection of stenosis of more than 50% and occlusion were calculated for both observers. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. RESULTS: In 14 of the 27 patients, hybrid technique was superior to moving-table technique because there was less venous overlap (11 patients), fewer motion artifacts (one patient), or both (two patients). In nine patients, there was no difference between techniques; in four patients, moving-table technique was superior. Stenosis grade was analyzed in 698 segments with MR angiography and in 638 segments with both conventional and MR angiography. Kappa analysis of interobserver agreement with MR angiography yielded a score of 0.84. For the 638 segments evaluated with both conventional and MR angiography, observers 1 and 2 assigned same grade of stenosis with both modalities in 558 and 555 segments, respectively. Sensitivity for stenoses greater than 50% and occlusion was 94.4% and 91.1% for observers 1 and 2, respectively, and specificity was 90.6% and 91.3%. More distal runoff vessels were shown with MR angiography in seven cases and with conventional angiography in two cases. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels with a 1.0-T system and dedicated peripheral angiography coil is feasible, and in some cases, it provides additional information compared with conventional angiography.     

Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of the pedal arteries in patients with diabetes mellitus and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA

To compare gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the pedal vasculature with selective intraarterial DSA. Eighteen patients with PAOD and type II diabetes were prospectively examined at 1.5 T. For contrast enhancement, 0.03 mmol/kg body weight gadofosveset was used. MR imaging consisted of dynamic and of high-resolution steady-state imaging. Selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed within 5 days and served as standard of reference. Image analysis was done by two observers. There were no differences between MRA and DSA regarding overall image quality. First-pass MRA detected significantly more patent vessel segments than did DSA (P < 0.001, kappa = 0.46). Interobserver agreement of MRA was very good with respect to the detection of patent vessel segments and the assessment of hemodynamically relevant stenoses (kappa = 0.97 and 0.89, respectively). Steady-state imaging depicted significantly more patent metatarsal arteries than did dynamic imaging, and delineated inflammatory complications including osteomyelitis, soft-tissue abscesses, and fistulas related to the diabetic foot. Gadofosveset-enhanced MRA of the pedal vasculature proved to be superior to DSA. It offered a long imaging time window, and allowed for better depiction of the pedal outflow. Steady-state imaging delineated inflammatory complications associated with the diabetic foot.     

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts

The aim of this study was to determine the potential of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as a standard of reference. Thirty-five patients with previous bypass graft surgery underwent DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography within 2 weeks. MR angiography was performed using a three-dimensional fast gradient-echo sequence after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Every leg was divided into 11 segments and scored in five categories of stenosis. MR angiography findings were compared with those of DSA. A total of 38 bypass grafts and 454 segments in 27 patients were included in the evaluation. In 33 (87 %) bypass grafts stenosis grading with both methods corresponded, and in 5 (13 %) cases stenosis was overestimated on MR angiography. Agreement in detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis (stenosis = 50 %) was 94.7 % with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 91.3 %. In 340 (83.0 %) vascular segments there was conformity in graduation, in 69 (16.88 %), there was a difference of one or more grades on MR angiograms. Forty-four segments (9.6 %) were not assessable due to technical limitations. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is an useful noninvasive tool in the detection of failing peripheral vascular bypass grafts. Received: 6 July 1999; Revised: 12 November 1999; Accepted: 4 January 2000     

Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid MR angiography by comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients prospectively underwent both hybrid MR angiography and DSA. The hybrid MR angiography study consisted of high-resolution MR angiography of a single calf and foot using a contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination with surface coils, followed by three-station bolus chase MR angiography with a dedicated peripheral vascular coil. Two blinded reviewers separately analyzed maximum-intensity-projection hybrid MR angiograms and DSA images. The peripheral vessels were divided into 10 anatomic segments for review. The status of each segment was graded as normal, stenosis less than 50% in diameter, stenosis greater than 50%, or occluded. The sensitivity and specificity of hybrid MR angiography were determined using DSA as the gold standard. Treatment options were considered separately from the results of each examination. RESULTS: Among 310 analyzed segments, the sensitivities of hybrid MR angiography for stenosis and occlusion were, respectively, 95% and 95% for reviewer 1 and 96% and 90% for reviewer 2. The specificities of hybrid MR angiography for stenosis and occlusion were, respectively, 98% and 98% for reviewer 1 and 98% and 99% for reviewer 2. In 25 patients (81%), the quality of bolus chase MR angiography images was insufficient to assess runoff arteries. All treatments proposed on the basis of DSA findings were endorsed by hybrid MR angiography findings. Eleven more treatments were formulated on the basis of hybrid MR angiography findings. Of these, four were due to overestimation of stenosis on MR angiography and seven were due to the detection of patent infrageniculate arteries on hybrid MR angiography that were not detected on DSA. CONCLUSION: Hybrid MR angiography depicts runoff arteries not seen on DSA. Hybrid MR angiography may be useful for treatment planning in selected diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.     

Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to use contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess the patency of peripheral arterial bypass grafts of the lower extremity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The study included 39 patients with 45 lower limb grafts. Twenty-eight were saphenous vein grafts, 13 were expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, and two were Dacron grafts. Digital subtraction angiography correlation was available for 30 patients (31 grafts). MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T system with a multichannel quadrature phased array peripheral vascular coil. The scanning delay was determined with a test bolus technique, using half-time to maximum signal intensity in the graft. Arterial imaging was accomplished with two three-dimensional MR angiography acquisitions with gadopentetate dimeglumine administered using an automated injector. The pelvic and femoral arteries were imaged, the MR table was repositioned, and the lower limb arteries were imaged. The three-dimensional MR angiography sequence used the following parameters: TR/TE, 5.2/1.5 msec; inversion time, 28 msec; flip angle, 30 degrees. The proximal anastomosis, graft, and distal anastomosis were characterized as normal, stenosed, occluded, or ectatic or aneurysmatic. RESULTS. Sensitivity and specificity values for MR angiography regarding the assessment of grafts were 100% for 87 evaluable segments for which digital subtraction angiography correlation was available: stenosis (n = 10), occlusions (n = 9), ectasia or aneurysms (n = 8). Six segments could not be assessed because of the presence of intravascular stents or metallic clips. CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography is well suited for the characterization of arterial grafts, for planning subsequent vascular interventions, and for excluding further lesions.     

Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA

PURPOSE: To compare a hybrid magnetic resonance (MR) angiography protocol with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with critical limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and written consent was obtained from all patients. Pretreatment DSA and hybrid MR angiography were performed in 19 consecutive patients (15 men, four women; mean age, 69.8 years; range, 44-86 years). Hybrid MR angiography included submillimeter dual-phase three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in lower calf and foot, and four-station bolus-chase MR angiography in pelvis, thigh, and upper calf. Three readers identified the target lesion and inflow and outflow segments and determined treatment (bypass graft placement, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, conservative management, amputation). Results of interobserver and intermethod comparisons were expressed as percentage of agreement and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: On hybrid MR angiograms, no substantial venous overlay was present and image quality was excellent or adequate in 18 (95%) of 19 limbs. Readers 1, 2, and 3 selected the identical target lesion on the DSA image and the MR angiogram in 18, 17, and 18 of 18 comparable limbs, respectively. Mean percentage of agreement for readers 1 and 3 was 100% (95% CI: 81%, 100%) and for reader 2 was 94% (95% CI: 73%, 100%). Agreement of all three readers was superior with use of MR angiography for determination of inflow segments (13 [72%] of 18 limbs) and outflow segments (17 [94%] of 18 limbs), compared with agreement with use of DSA (13 [68%] of 19 inflow segments, 10 [53%] of 19 outflow segments). Agreement in therapy decisions was higher with DSA (15 [79%] of 19) than with MR angiography (11 [61%] of 18). CONCLUSION: Preliminary data strongly support the combination of submillimeter dual-phase MR angiography in lower calf and foot with four-station bolus-chase MR angiography to extend the utility of MR angiography to patients with critical limb ischemia.     

Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography

OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic performance of a three-dimensional MR angiography-based strategy was assessed with regard to its ability to characterize the arterial vasculature from the aortic bifurcation to the lower extremity runoff vessels. A single-injection, two-station protocol in combination with a lower-extremity vascular coil was used. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Both conventional digital subtraction angiography and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with a dedicated peripheral vascular coil were performed in 61 patients with suspected peripheral vascular disease. In a prospective analysis, one reviewer evaluated the digital subtraction angiographic images and a second reviewer evaluated the MR angiographic images; both were unaware of the results of the other imaging technique. Each vascular segment (29 segments per patient) was evaluated for the presence of occlusive vessel disease. The following grading system was applied: 0, normal; 1, vessel irregularity with a luminal reduction of less than 10%; 2, mild stenosis (lumen reduction, 10-49%); 3, severe stenosis (lumen reduction, 50-99%); and 4, occlusion (lumen reduction, 100%). In 11 patients surgical graft patency was assessed. RESULTS: MR angiography provided an image quality comparable with that of digital subtraction angiography. Overall sensitivity and specificity for MR angiography were 92% and 96.6%, respectively, for the detection of hemodynamically significant disease and 92.3% and 99.4%, respectively, for the detection of occlusions. CONCLUSION: Two-station contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with a dedicated lower-extremity vascular coil proved effective enough to consider it as a noninvasive alternative to digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of the pelvic and lower extremity arterial vasculature.     

Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for stenosis depiction in malfunctioning hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs), as compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts in 48 consecutive patients. Vascular tree of accesses was divided into between three and eight segments depending on access type (AVF or AVG) and length of venous outflow. Images obtained with MR and DSA were interpreted by two MR radiologists and two interventional radiologists, respectively, who were blinded to information from each other and other studies. DSA was reference standard for stenosis detection. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of contrast-enhanced MR in detection of vascular segments containing hemodynamically significant (> or =50%) stenosis were calculated. Linear-weighted kappa statistic was calculated for contrast-enhanced MR and DSA to determine interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection. RESULTS: A total of 282 vascular segments were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced MR depicted three false-positive stenoses and all but two of 70 significant stenoses depicted with DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MR in detection of vessel segments with significant stenoses were 97% (95% CI: 90%, 99%), 99% (95% CI: 96%, 100%), 96% (95% CI: 88%, 99%), and 99% (95% CI: 97%, 100%), respectively. MR demonstrated significant stenosis in four of five nondiagnostic DSA segments, whereas DSA showed no significant stenosis in four nondiagnostic MR segments. Linear-weighted kappa statistic for interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95) for MR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.97) for DSA. CONCLUSION: MR angiography depicts stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis accesses but has limited clinical value as result of current inability to perform MR-guided access interventions after stenosis detection. MR of dysfunctional access should be considered only if nondiagnostic vascular segment is present at DSA.     

Moyamoya disease: diagnosis with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.

Twelve patients with moyamoya disease were studied with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and the findings were compared with results obtained with conventional arteriography. Of a total of 24 supraclinoid internal carotid arteries studied, 21 arteries (88%) were accurately evaluated with MR angiography and in three arteries the extent of occlusive disease was overestimated. Of a total of 72 large branch basal cerebral vessels, including the bilateral anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries, 61 arteries (85%) were accurately evaluated with MR angiography and in 11 arteries the extent of occlusive disease was overestimated. While conventional arteriography showed basal cerebral moyamoya vessels in all 24 hemispheres, MR angiography showed moyamoya vessels in 20 of these. Of a total of 28 large leptomeningeal and transdural collateral vessels, 18 were identified with MR angiography. In the one surgical collateral vessel evaluated, MR angiography successfully showed its patency. MR angiography may have value in following disease progression and, perhaps, in evaluation of surgical bypass patency.     

Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography

PURPOSE: To determine whether contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography (CE MRA) could replace digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease of the lower leg and foot. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with symptoms of atherosclerotic disease of the leg were examined prospectively with CE MRA of the foot and the lower legs as well as with DSA from the aorta to the pedal arches. The MRA technique was focused on optimal imaging of the arteries of the foot. RESULTS: The agreement between CE MRA and DSA for grading of stenosis was moderate to good (weighted kappa-values 0.48-0.80). The sensitivity of CE MRA for detection of significant stenosis (> or = 50%) was 92% and the specificity was 64% with DSA as gold standard. CONCLUSION: CE MRA is a fairly accurate method for the demonstration of atherosclerotic disease below the knee including the pedal arches. It can replace DSA for the assessment of distal arteries in patients with impaired renal function. However, image quality and resolution still needs to be improved before CE MRA can become the method of choice in all patients.     

Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease

PURPOSE: Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance (MR) angiography to catheter arteriography in endovascular and surgical treatment planning in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients scheduled for catheter arteriography for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease underwent contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography immediately prior to arteriography. A treatment plan was determined by the vascular surgeon, based on MR angiography, who was blinded to the catheter arteriogram. The treatment plan determined by the MR angiogram was compared to the final treatment plan, which was based on the catheter arteriogram and intraluminal pressure measurements. RESULTS: Treatment plans based on MR angiography and catheter arteriography were identical in 10 of 13 patients (71%). For identifying lesions resulting in intervention, MR angiography had sensitivity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 92%. MR angiography had a treatment specific predictive value of 88% for each lesion identified, and 95% for lesions identified in patients evaluated for claudication. If treatment plans were based on MR angiography only, 46% of patients would have avoided catheter arteriography. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography may be an effective alternative to catheter arteriography in endovascular and surgical treatment planning in selected patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, but larger studies are necessary to confirm this.     

Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical use of MR angiography (MRA) for examining the pelvic and lower limb arteries in patients with arterial occlusive disease. METHOD: Seventy-six patients with clinical signs of peripheral arterial occlusive disease were included in the study. MRA was performed using a fast contrast-enhanced high-resolution 3D technique that covered the area from the distal abdominal aorta to the distal lower limbs in two examination steps. RESULTS: In all patients, diagnostic images comparable with those of conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) could be obtained. No false-negative findings were seen in the iliac, femoral, or popliteal arteries. Ten to 16% of the mild stenoses and 6-14% of the severe stenoses, mainly in the crural vessels, were overgraded compared with intraarterial DSA. Particularly in patients with proximal severe obstructions or occlusions, the crural segments could be depicted more clearly due to decreased arterial runoff in conventional angiography. CONCLUSION: The consistency of the excellent depiction of the vascular territories of the distal aorta and the pelvic and lower limb arteries in a standardized setting suggests great potential for the use of MRA in the primary diagnosis of peripheral arterial occlusive disease.     

Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: Diagnostic accuracy

In this study, our purpose was to compare the high-resolution contrast-material-enhanced three-dimensional subtraction MR angiography with conventional angiography for occlusive disease in the pelvic and lower extremity arteries. A three-dimensional fast-imaging with steady precession (FISP) sequence with a 256 × 512 matrix was obtained on 1.5T MR unit using a phased array coil. Twenty patients with arteriosclerotic obstructive disease underwent subtraction dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography. In 15 patients, three regions (pelvis, upper knee, and lower knee) were sequentially obtained after repeated injection of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA). In the other five patients, one region was imaged (total of 50 examinations); a maximum-intensity projection (MIP) algorithm was used for subtracted images. All patients also underwent conventional angiography. Angiographic images were divided into several anatomical segments. Three blinded radiologists independently graded a total of 50 anatomic segments with stenotic or obstructive diseases and 90 segments without disease. Subtracted images allowed resolution of small branch vessels in all examinations, although misregistration was seen in eight examinations of five patients. All arteries larger than 1 mm in diameter were visualized on subtracted images. For detection of significant stenosis (>50%), MR angiography had 96% sensitivity and 83% specificity. The correlation coefficient of degree of agreement between MR angiography and conventional angiography was .92. Stenotic vessels tended to be overestimated. We conclude that high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography is capable of depicting small vessel anatomy of the pelvis and lower extremities. Sequential MR angiography of different regions was feasible by repeated injection of Gd-DTPA and subtraction. This technique is highly sensitive in detecting lesions, but stenosis tended to be overestimated.     

Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: The danger of limb loss as a consequence of acute occlusion of infrapopliteal bypasses underscores the requirement for careful patient follow-up. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement and accuracy of contrast material-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and duplex ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of failing bypass grafts. In cases of discrepancy, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR angiography was performed in 24 consecutive patients with 26 femorotibial or femoropedal bypass grafts. Each revascularized limb was divided into five segments--(i) native arteries proximal to the graft; (ii) proximal anastomosis; (iii) graft course; (iv) distal anastomosis; and (v) native arteries distal to the graft-resulting in 130 vascular segments. Three readers evaluated all MR angiograms for image quality and the presence of failing grafts. The degree of stenosis was compared to the findings of duplex US, and in case of discrepancy, to DSA findings. Two separate analyses were performed with use of DSA only and a combined diagnostic endpoint as the reference standard. RESULTS: Image quality was rated excellent or intermediate in 119 of 130 vascular segments (92%). Venous overlay was encountered in 26 of 130 segments (20%). In only two segments was evaluation of the outflow region not feasible. One hundred seventeen of 130 vascular segments were available for quantitative analysis. In 109 of 117 segments (93%), MR angiography and duplex US showed concordant findings. In the eight discordant segments in seven patients, duplex US overlooked four high-grade stenoses that were correctly identified by MR angiography and confirmed by DSA. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in these cases. In no case did MR angiography miss an area of stenosis of sufficient severity to require treatment. Total accuracy for duplex US ranged from 0.90 to 0.97 depending on the reference standard used, whereas MR angiography was completely accurate (1.00) regardless of the standard definition. CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggest that the accuracy of MR angiography for identifying failing grafts in the infrapopliteal circulation is equal to that of duplex US and superior to that of duplex US in cases of complex revascularization. MR angiography should be included in routine follow-up of patients undergoing infrapopliteal bypass surgery.     

Diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography for symptomatic infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography in detecting calf and pedal artery occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Time-resolved MR angiography of calf and pedal arteries was performed on 59 symptomatic legs of 52 patients using the head coil and bolus injections of 6 mL of gadolinium contrast medium. Selective X-ray digital subtraction angiography was performed within 30 days after MR angiography. Calf and pedal arteries were divided into 10 segments. X-ray digital subtraction angiography and MR angiography images were retrospectively interpreted by three expert observers, who graded segments as having no significant stenosis, significant stenosis (> 50%), or occlusion. The accuracy of MR angiography interpretations was compared with the accuracy of consensus X-ray digital subtraction angiography interpretations as the standard of reference. Arterial segments with discrepant grading on X-ray digital subtraction angiography and MR angiography were reviewed again to determine the reasons for disagreement. RESULTS: Arterial phase MR angiography images free of venous contamination were obtained in every case. The agreement between MR angiography and X-ray digital subtraction angiography in depicting infrapopliteal arterial disease was fair to good (kappa = 0.44-0.92). Overall sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 87%, respectively, for detecting significant stenosis of calf and pedal arteries and 86% and 93%, respectively, for detecting occlusions. Accuracy was higher in the larger vessels-for example, calf (84%) compared with foot (71%). In 21% (22/105) of the segments graded differently on MR angiography than on X-ray digital subtraction angiography, it was believed that MR angiography was more likely to be correct than X-ray digital subtraction angiography because of visualization of late-filling arteries on MR angiography that did not opacify on X-ray digital subtraction angiography. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography accurately evaluates calf and pedal arteries without degradation from venous contamination.     

Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with that of conventional angiography for imaging the lower extremity vasculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients who were evaluated for possible surgical intervention underwent conventional angiography (ie, digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ie, time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics [TRICKS]). Two independent, blinded readers evaluated vessel stenosis and occlusion at DSA and MR angiographic image readings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. The Cohen kappa test was performed to examine interreader variability. RESULTS: At pooled readings, contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 98% for detection of occlusion. For detection of significant stenosis (at least one > or = 50% stenosis), sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 91%, respectively. Interreader agreement was high for detection of both occlusion (kappa = 0.76) and significant stenosis (kappa = 0.68). Sensitivity increased as MR angiographic technical parameters were optimized. When improvements resulting from coil type and injection protocol were considered, the sensitivity and specificity of TRICKS MR angiography were 89% and 97%, respectively, for occlusion detection and 87% and 90%, respectively, for significant stenosis detection. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced TRICKS MR angiography is a feasible and minimally invasive means of acquiring angiograms of the peripheral vasculature with high sensitivity and specificity.     

Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases

Although spatial resolution of current MR angiography is excellent, temporal resolution has remained unsatisfactory. We evaluated clinical applicability of 2D thick-slice, contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography (2D-MR digital subtraction angiography) with sub-second temporal resolution in cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Twenty-five patients with cerebrovascular occlusive diseases (8 moyamoya diseases, 10 proximal internal carotid occlusions, and 2 sinus thromboses ) were studied with a 1.5-T MR unit. The MR digital subtraction angiography (MRDSA) was performed per 0.97 s continuously just after a bolus injection of 15 ml of gadolinium chelates up to 40 s in sagittal (covering hemisphere) or coronal planes. Subtraction images were generated at a workstation. We evaluated imaging quality and hemodynamic information of MRDSA in comparison with those of routine MR imaging, non-contrast MR angiography, and X-ray intra-arterial DSA. Major cerebral arteries, all of the venous sinuses, and most tributaries were clearly visualized with 2D MRDSA. Also, pure arterial phases were obtained in all cases. The MRDSA technique demonstrated prolonged circulation in sinus thromboses, distal patent lumen of proximal occlusion, and some collateral circulation. Such hemodynamic information was comparable to that of intra-arterial DSA. Two-dimensional thick-slice MRDSA with high temporal resolution has a unique ability to demonstrate cerebral hemodynamics equivalent to that of intra-arterial DSA and may play an important role for evaluation of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Received: 16 November 1999; Revised: 27 June 2000; Accepted: 29 June 2000