Role of receipt of antenatal care in subsequent contraceptive use at primary health care centres serving slum areas of Cairo,Egypt

Abstract

Objectives: Information on family planning and use of antenatal care services is vital for understanding the main influences on fertility and evaluating the success of national family planning programmes. This study aimed to explore contraceptive use and its relation to use of antenatal care services in Egypt.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among women attending three primary health care centres serving different slum areas of Cairo.

Results: Most of women who used antenatal care services obtained contraception from the state sector. Although the number of antenatal care visits was not significantly associated with contraceptive use, it was a significant determining factor for the type of method used. Reasons given for non-use of contraception were related to reproductive health concerns or disapproval of contraceptive use.

Conclusion: Contraceptive use is widespread in Egypt, regardless of age and level of education. Antenatal care is no longer viewed with suspicion. Antenatal care visits are an opportunity for health care providers (HCPs) to encourage the use of contraception. Repeated antenatal care visits help to engender a relationship of trust between women and HCPs. Incorporation of family planning programmes into antenatal care programmes would be an opportunity to promote modern contraceptive use.     

Changing models of public antenatal care in Australia: Is current practice meeting the needs of vulnerable populations?

Objectiveto investigate women's views and experiences of public antenatal care.Designpopulation-based survey in two states.SettingSouth Australia and Victoria, Australia.Participants4366 women surveyed at 5–6 months post partum.Findingsof 8468 eligible women mailed the survey, 52% returned completed questionnaires. Fifty-seven per cent of women (2496/4339) received public antenatal care. Of these, half attended a GP for some/all antenatal visits, 38% attended a public hospital clinic or midwives clinic, and 12% had primary midwife care, mostly in a midwifery group practice. Women with complex needs – young women, those experiencing multiple social health problems, women of non-English speaking background, and women at higher risk of complications in pregnancy – were the least likely to say that care met their needs. Women attending a GP or midwife as a primary caregiver were the most positive about their antenatal care: 69% and 74% respectively describing their antenatal care as ‘very good’. Women attending a standard public hospital clinic were the least positive about their antenatal care with only 48% rating their care as ‘very good’. Women enroling in GP shared care or attending a midwives clinic at a public hospital gave intermediate ratings.Conclusion and implications for practiceModels of public antenatal care involving a designated lead primary caregiver (GP or midwife) came closest to meeting women's need for information, individualised care and support.     

How am I,really? Perceptions of health and distress by women and their midwives

Objective: This study examined agreement between ratings of health and emotional distress by women and their midwives.

Background: Physical complaints and medical complications during pregnancy can significantly impact a woman’s experience of pregnancy. Previous studies have found that women and their healthcare providers may have differing perceptions of their condition and how they are coping with the challenges of pregnancy.

Methods: This study used questionnaires completed by women and their midwives to assess perceptions of health and emotional distress in two contexts. Sixty-eight of the women were on an antenatal unit, hospitalised for complications of their pregnancy; 33 women were a comparison group in community maternity care.

Findings: Many women in the hospital experienced high levels of emotional distress and worry about their pregnancy; 45% scored in the clinical range on state anxiety, and 28% screened positive for depression. However, midwives rating emotional distress did not pick up on this consistently, and women and hospital midwives often viewed their health status differently. In the community, women’s ratings of their health were more consistent with the ratings of their midwives, and midwives were attuned to acute anxiety, but had more difficulty picking up on cues to depression.

Conclusion: It is challenging, particularly in the unfamiliar and stressful environment of the antenatal unit, for midwives to assess emotional distress and needs for health information. Deliberate screening for antenatal distress might provide the opening for midwives to empower women to identify their options, strengths, and strategies for self-care and emotional resilience.     

Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women's views on alternative packages of care

Objective

To investigate the views of women in relation to the provision of antenatal care.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment using a sample of 100 women who were nulliparous (pregnant for the first time) and attending for routine ultrasound scan in the 20th week of their pregnancy.

Results

Women preferred antenatal care visits to be provided by a community midwife at a local clinic and to have 10 visits rather than 7. In addition they favoured the provision of education/preparation for birth, the use of uterine artery Doppler screening, and the provision of a telephone advice line. The results show that women were prepared to trade-off fewer antenatal care visits to ensure access to their packages of antenatal care that reflected their preferences.

Conclusions

Whilst the number of antenatal care visits is important to women they may accept fewer visits if antenatal care is provided by midwives and they receive enhanced service provision such as a telephone advice line and uterine artery Doppler screening.     

To see or not to see? Midwives'' perceptions of reduced antenatal attendances for ‘low-risk’ women

Objective: to explore the views of midwives towards traditional and flexible schedules of antenatal attendance for women at low risk.Design: a qualitative approach using focus groups.Setting: three NHS Trusts providing maternity care in and around Bristol.Sample: 14 midwives who had provided antenatal care to women participating in the Bristol Antenatal Care Study.Findings: midwives generally expressed support for a move away from the traditional schedule of antenatal attendances, suggesting that this represented a move towards the acceptance of pregnancy as a normal life event. They recognised that some women would prefer flexible care and the possibility of a reduction in the number of antenatal attendances. However, they suggested that some women would require additional information in order to feel confident in these circumstances. The midwives also recognised that both they and pregnant women have reservations about reducing contact during the antenatal period. Central to these reservations is a concern that women's psychosocial as well as physical needs may go unmet if antenatal contact is reduced.Implications for practice: although in principle supporting a move away from the traditional schedule of antenatal attendances, the reservations felt by midwives towards a reduction in antenatal attendances are reflected in their practice. These concerns currently impede any radical move away from the traditional schedule of antenatal check-ups and will need to be addressed by midwifery managers prior to the implementation of a more flexible schedule of antenatal attendances, if any such change is to be sustainable.     

The use of midwife-led primary antenatal care by obese women in The Netherlands: An explorative cohort study

Objectiveto study the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the use of antenatal care by women in midwife-led care.Designan explorative cohort study.Setting11 Dutch midwife-led practices.Participantsa cohort of 4421 women, registered in the Midwifery Case Registration System (VeCaS), who received antenatal care in midwife-led practices in the Netherlands and gave birth between October 2012 and October 2014.Findingsthe mean start of initiation of care was at 9.3 (SD 4.6) weeks of pregnancy. Multiple linear regression showed that with an increasing BMI initiation of care was significantly earlier but BMI only predicted 0.2% (R²) of the variance in initiation of care. The mean number of face-to- face antenatal visits in midwife-led care was 11.8 (SD 3.8) and linear regression showed that with increasing BMI the number of antenatal visits increased. BMI predicted 0.1% of the variance in number of antenatal visits. The mean number of antenatal contacts by phone was 2.2 (SD 2.6). Multiple linear regression showed an increased number of contacts by phone for BMI categories 'underweight' and 'obese class I'. BMI categories predicted 1% of the variance in number of contacts by phone.Key conclusionsBMI was not a relevant predictor of variance in initiation of care and number of antenatal visits. Obese pregnant women in midwife-led practices do not delay or avoid antenatal care.Implications for practiceTaking care of pregnant women with a high BMI does not significantly add to the workload of primary care midwives. Further research is needed to more fully understand the primary maternal health services given to obese women.     

The expectations of antenatal screening and experiences of the first-trimester screening scan

Aimto describe the expectations to and knowledge of antenatal screening of expecting parents, and their experiences concerning the first-trimester screening scan.Designsurvey study with a consecutive sampling method.Settingtwo hospital districts in Finland, namely the capital area and Eastern Finland. Together these two districts include the six different municipal units in which the first-trimester screening scans discussed in the study were done during spring 2015.Participants1037 participants: 654 pregnant women and 346 partners.Measurements and findingsthe survey was based on an electronic questionnaire containing 29 questions. Almost all the pregnant women involved had received information on screenings during antenatal care, but only 20% reported a good level of familiarity with the various screening methods. Of the respondents, around 30% of the partners and 26% of all participants with lower education considered their knowledge to be poor. Around 30% of nulliparous respondents reported a need for further information. The experiences of the first-trimester screening scans were generally positive, though some of the partners felt they were treated too impersonally. Parents were well informed during the scan.Key conclusionsthe expectations of the antenatal screening of the parents-to-be were realistic, even for those whose knowledge of antenatal screening by their own estimation inadequate. Nulliparous and highly-educated respondents would have needed more counselling. For all respondents the first trimester screening scan generally reinforced the sense of becoming a parent.Implications for practicenew ways to provide information on antenatal screening are needed. In particular, there should be a focus on making the information more understandable and accessible both to pregnant women and to partners. The results of this study could be used in developing such means of providing such information during antenatal care and services in ultrasound units. The results would also be helpful for improving professional skills of the medical personnel performing the scans, and for providing information on them.     

An evaluation of community antenatal care

A study to ascertain how the community based antenatal services in the East End of Glasgow related to the guidelines set by a Working Party on Ante-Natal and Intrapartum Care (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1982) is reported. All community based clinics were visited and described. The socio-economic status of the sample population was defined and users' views and preferences sought. The women sampled were often socially and economically disadvantaged. Unemployment was high. They received their community antenatal care from midwives, general practitioners and consultants in both health centres and general practitioner surgeries. Women were generally satisfied with the care they received. Answers to more specific questions indicated, however, that more information and individualised care would be appreciated.     

Barriers and facilitators in antenatal settings to screening and referral of pregnant women who use alcohol or other drugs: A qualitative study of midwives’ experience

BackgroundScreening pregnant women for substance use is highly recommended in antenatal care settings. Although midwives provide routine screening for substance use and referral for treatment in pregnancy, little is known about the barriers and facilitators they experience.AimThe study explored barriers and facilitators experienced by midwives in antenatal settings to screening and referral of pregnant women who use alcohol or other drugs.Design/settingA semi-structured interview was adopted to explore barriers and facilitators experienced by midwives in screening and referring pregnant women for alcohol or other drugs specialised services. Eighteen midwives were recruited from urban, regional and rural antenatal settings in Victoria. Interviews were tape recorded and transcribed verbatim. Themes were generated by thematic analysis, the process of identifying patterns within the data.FindingsOf the seven themes identified under barriers, five could be categorised as “institution and provider-related”, namely: (i) lack of validated screening tool, (ii) inadequate support and training, (iii) discomfort in screening, (iv) lack of multidisciplinary team and specialised treatment in regional and rural areas, and (v) workload and limited consultation time. Conversely, two themes could be classified as ‘client-related’, namely (i) non- or partial-disclosure of substance use, and (ii) reluctance and non-adherence to referrals. All five themes under facilitators were “institution and provider-related.” They are (i) a woman-centred philosophy of care, (ii) evidence of harms from substance use on neonates, (iii) experience and training, (iv) continuity of care, and (v) availability of multidisciplinary team and funding.Key conclusions and implications for practiceTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind conducted in Victoria. This study not only adds to the limited body of knowledge on barriers experienced by midwives but also identifies facilitators in antenatal settings that promote screening and referral of pregnant women who use substance. Most of the barriers and facilitators are interrelated. Despite midwives’ willingness to screen all pregnant women for substance use and provision of referral, they often felt limited in their capacity. Availability and accessibility to validated screening tool(s), in addition to regular, ongoing training for all midwives to maintain clinical competence and provide effective communication are imperative. Availability of a multidisciplinary team, funds and specialised care facilities such as detoxification and mental health services, especially in regional and rural areas, are necessary to effectively support at-risk pregnant women.     

What helps or hinders midwives to implement physical activity guidelines for obese pregnant women? A questionnaire survey using the Theoretical Domains Framework

Objectiveto investigate barriers and facilitators to physical activity (PA) guideline implementation for midwives when advising obese pregnant women.Designa cross-sectional, self-completion, anonymous questionnaire was designed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. this framework was developed to evaluate the implementation of guidelines by health care professionals. A total of 40 questions were included. These were informed by previous research on pregnant women's and midwives views, knowledge and attitudes to PA, and supported by national evidence based guidelines. Demographic information and free text comments were also collected.Settingthree diverse NHS Trusts in the North East of England.Participantsall midwives employed by two hospital Trusts and the community midwives from the third Trust (n=375) were invited to participate.Measurementsmean domain scores were calculated. Factor and regression analysis were performed to describe which theoretical domains may be influencing practice. Free text comments were analysed thematically.Findings192 (53%) questionnaires were returned. Mean domain scores were highest for social professional role and knowledge, and lowest for skills, beliefs about capabilities and behaviour regulation. Regression analysis indicated that skills and memory/attention/decision domains had a statistically significant influence on midwives discussing PA with obese pregnant women and advising them accordingly. Midwives comments indicated that they felt it was part of their role to discuss PA with all pregnant women but felt they lacked the skills and resources to do so effectively.Key conclusionsmidwives seem to have the necessary knowledge about the need/importance of PA advice for obese women and believe it is part of their role, but perceive they lack necessary skills and resources, and do not plan or prioritise the discussion regarding PA with obese pregnant woman.Implications for practicedesigning interventions that improve skills, promote routine enquiry regarding PA and provide resources (eg. information, referral pathways) may help improve midwives’ PA advice.     

Addressing transition to motherhood,guideline adherence by midwives in prenatal booking visits: Findings from video recordings

ObjectiveTo assess if and how primary care midwives adhere to the guideline by addressing transition to motherhood at the first prenatal booking visit and to what extent there was a difference in addressing transition to motherhood between nulliparous and multiparous women.DesignCross-sectional observational study of video-recorded prenatal booking visits.Setting and participants126 video recordings of prenatal booking visits with 18 primary care midwives in the Netherlands taking place between August 2010 and April 2011.MeasurementsFive observers assessed dichotomously if midwives addressed seven topics of transition to motherhood according to the Dutch guideline prenatal midwifery care from the Royal Dutch Organization of Midwives and used six communication techniques. Frequencies and percentages of addressing each topic and communication technique were calculated. Differences between nulliparous and multiparous women were examined with Chi-Square tests or Fischer Exact tests, were appropriate. The agreement between the five observers was quantified using Fleiss' Kappa.FindingsDuring all visits at least one of the seven topics of transition to motherhood was addressed. The topics mother-to-infant bonding and support were addressed respectively in 2% and 16% of the visits. In almost all visits the topics desirability of the pregnancy, experience with the ultrasound examination or abdominal palpation or hearing the foetal heartbeat and practical preparation were addressed. Open questions for addressing transition to motherhood were used in 6% of the prenatal booking visits. Dutch midwives addressed transition to motherhood mostly by giving information (100%) and by using closed-ended questions (94%) and following woman's initiative (90%). Nulliparous women brought up transition to motherhood on their own initiative more often than multiparous women (97% versus 84%). For the topics ‘desirability of the pregnancy ‘and’ practical preparations’ and for conversation techniques ‘giving information’ and ‘closed-ended questions’, 100% agreement was achieved. However, the topic ‘Support’ had poor agreement (kappa = 0.19).Key conclusions and implications for practiceAlthough during every visit the transition of motherhood was addressed, the topics mother-to-infant bonding and support should get more attention. Midwives should improve adherence to the guideline by addressing transition to motherhood and by using more open questions. Furthermore, they should focus on taking the initiative to address the transition to motherhood in multiparous women themselves.     

Project 20: Midwives’ insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works,for whom,in what circumstances,and how

IntroductionContinuity of care models are known to improve clinical outcomes for women and their babies, but it is not understood how. A realist synthesis of how women with social risk factors experience UK maternity care reported mechanisms thought to improve clinical outcomes and experiences. As part of a broader programme of work to test those theories and fill gaps in the literature base we conducted focus groups with midwives working within continuity of care models of care for women with social factors that put them at a higher chance of having poor birth outcomes. These risk factors can include poverty and social isolation, asylum or refugee status, domestic abuse, mental illness, learning difficulties, and substance abuse problems.ObjectiveTo explore the insights of midwives working in continuity models of care for women with social risk factors in order to understand the resources they provide, and how the model of care can improve women’s outcomes.DesignRealist methodology was used to gain a deeper understanding of how women react to specific resources that the models of care offer and how these resources are thought to lead to particular outcomes for women. Twelve midwives participated, six from a continuity of care model implemented in a community setting serving an area of deprivation in London, and six from a continuity of care model for women with social risk factors, based within a large teaching hospital in London.FindingsThree main themes were identified: ‘Perceptions of the model of care, ‘Tailoring the service to meet women’s needs’, ‘Going above and beyond’. Each theme is broken down into three subthemes to reveal specific resources or mechanisms which midwives felt might have an impact on women’s outcomes, and how women with different social risk factors respond to these mechanisms.Conclusions/implications for practiceOverall the midwives in both models of care felt the service was beneficial to women and had a positive impact on their outcomes. It was thought the trusting relationships they had built with women enabled midwives to guide women through a fragmented, unfamiliar system and respond to their individual physical, emotional, and social needs, whilst ensuring follow-up of appointments and test results. Midwives felt that for these women the impact of a trusting relationship affected how much information women disclosed, allowing for enhanced, needs led, holistic care. Interesting mechanisms were identified when discussing women who had social care involvement with midwives revealing techniques they used to advocate for women and help them to regain trust in the system and demonstrate their parenting abilities. Differences in how each team provided care and its impact on women’s outcomes were considered with the midwives in the community-based model reporting how their location enabled them to help women integrate into their local community and make use of specialist services. The study demonstrates the complexity of these models of care, with midwives using innovative and compassionate ways of working to meet the multifaceted needs of this population.     

A safe motherhood education and counselling programme in Istanbul

Objective?Evaluation of an education/counselling programme intended for pregnant/puerperal women in a secondary health care facility.

Methods?The education/counselling programme was launched in September 2004, following the preparation of environmental and material components. Evaluation of the two-year project was achieved by means of satisfaction surveys of service receivers and service providers, an information survey of service receivers and focus group discussions (FGDs) for both groups.

Results?Forty percent of the pregnant women who attended antenatal visits and 90% of those who had recently delivered were given education/counselling in accordance with the project. The information survey showed that 92.5% of the pregnant women knew that they should take an iron supplement during pregnancy and the puerperium; 72% of the puerperal women knew of the danger signs postpartum and concerning the newborn, and 70% were aware of the methods of effective breastfeeding. The FGDs showed improved competence of the applicants in pre-delivery, pregnancy and puerperal care as well as in newborn nutrition. Feedback from service providers confirmed the patients' improved active participation in their self-care.

Conclusion?The safe motherhood education/counselling programme was successfully completed. The applicants and health care professionals benefited from the service.     

Australian midwives' knowledge of antenatal and postpartum depression: a national survey

Introduction: Emotional care provided by midwives may improve health and well‐being; reduce stress, trauma, and depressive symptoms; and enhance maternal outcomes in childbearing women. The provision of intrapartum and postpartum emotional care can be challenging and requires a good knowledge base for the provider to screen and assist distressed women. This study assessed Australian midwives’ levels of knowledge and learning needs regarding antenatal depression and postpartum depression. Methods: Eight hundred and fifteen members of the Australian College of Midwives completed a postal survey, which consisted of 20 items drawn from the literature and the National Baseline Survey—Health Professional Knowledge Questionnaire. Results: On average, respondents correctly answered 62.9% of items related to antenatal depression and 70.7% of questions about postpartum depression. Many midwives were unable to identify the risk factors (70.6%) or prevalence of antenatal depression (49.6%). Nearly all (98.3%) respondents underestimated the percentage of antenatally depressed women that attempts suicide. Significant percentages of midwives did not correctly identify the incidence (44.4%), onset period (71%), and treatment options (32%) associated with postpartum depression. About half did not understand the use of antidepressant medications (48.6%) and incorrectly reported that the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was a suitable instrument to assess symptoms of psychotic depression (43.8%). Discussion: There are key knowledge deficits relating to onset of, assessment of, and treatment for depressive symptoms during the antenatal and postpartum periods. There is a need for continuing professional education to improve midwives’ knowledge and competency in the assessment and care of women suffering depression.     

Developing and introducing a post birth care plan (PBCP): An action research project

ObjectiveThere is ongoing poor evaluation of post-birth care and an urgent need to improve women's satisfaction. To develop and evaluate an acceptable and useable post-birth care plan template through collaboration with women and community midwives.DesignQualitative methodology using an action research design. Setting and participants: North East Scotland. 10 pregnant women and 6 community midwives.FindingsSeven themes emerged from thematic analysis that informed the format of the PBCP template: being prepared for transitions, physical needs, psychosocial needs, cultural, religious and spiritual needs, organisation of care information, knowledge transfer, financial information and guidance.Key conclusionsWomen and midwives recognised the benefit of using a PBCP to ensure all information is covered and that care is individualised and organised according to cultural, social and physical needs, especially when there is fragmentation of services. The open conversational style of the PBCP provides opportunity to explore post-birth needs and how they develop over time.Implications for practicePBCPs provide an opportunity for women to explore their post-birth needs with their midwife, enabling them to have meaningful, respectful conversations with their midwives during the antenatal and post-birth period. This has the potential to increase women's satisfaction with their care and is particularly pertinent in regions where fragmentary systems of care are prevalent.     

“Are you doing your pelvic floor?” An ethnographic exploration of the interaction between women and midwives about pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) during pregnancy

ObjectiveMany women experience urinary incontinence (UI) during and after pregnancy. Pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) can prevent and reduce the symptoms of UI. The objective of the study was to explore challenges, opportunities and concerns for women and health care professionals (HCPs), related to the implementation of PFME training for women in current antenatal care.DesignAn ethnographic study design was used. Researchers also formed and collaborated with a public advisory group, consisting of seven women with recent experiences of pregnancy, throughout the study.ParticipantsSeventeen midwife-woman interactions were observed in antenatal clinics. In addition, 23 midwives and 15 pregnant women were interviewed. Repeat interviews were carried out with 12 of the women postnatally. Interviews were also carried out with other HCPs; four physiotherapists, a linkworker/translator and two consultant obstetricians. Additional data sources included field notes, photographs, leaflets, policy and other relevant documents.SettingData were collected in three geographical areas of the UK spanning rural, urban and suburban areas. Data collection took place in antenatal clinics, in primary and secondary care settings, and the majority of women were interviewed in their homes.FindingsThree broad and inter-related themes of “ideological commitment”, “confidence” and “assumptions, stigma and normalisation” were identified. The challenges, opportunities and concerns regarding PFME implementation were explored within these themes.Conclusions and implications for practiceAlthough HCPs and some women knew that PFME were important, they were not prioritised and the significant benefits of doing PFME may not have been communicated by midwives or recognised by women. There was a lack of confidence amongst midwives to teach PFME and manage UI within the antenatal care pathway and amongst women to ask about PFME or UI. A perceived lack of consistent guidelines and policy at local and national levels may have impeded clear communication and prioritisation of PFME. Furthermore, assumptions made by both women and midwives, for example, women regarding UI as a normal outcome of pregnancy, or midwives’ perception that certain women were more likely to do PFME, may have exacerbated this situation. Training for midwives to help women in the antenatal period to engage in PFME could address challenges and concerns and to help prevent opportunities for women to learn about PFME from being missed.     

How do women feel about being weighed during pregnancy? A qualitative exploration of the opinions and experiences of postnatal women

Objectiveto explore routine weighing in antenatal care and weight management in pregnancy with women who have been weighed during pregnancy.Designa qualitative study utilising semi-structured telephone interviews, and thematic analysis.Settingparticipants resided in Dublin, Ireland and had been weighed during pregnancy.Participantsindividual telephone interviews conducted with ten postpartum women (nine months postpartum).Findingsexperiences of routine weighing were positive, and participants believed it should be part of standard antenatal care. Several benefits to routine weighing were cited, including providing reassurance and minimising postpartum weight retention. It was felt that there was a lack of information provided on gestational weight gain and healthy lifestyle in pregnancy, and that healthcare professionals are ideally placed to provide this advice. Increased information provision was seen as a method to improve healthy lifestyle behaviours in pregnancy.Key conclusions and implications for practicethese findings contribute to the current debate about the re-introduction of routine weighing throughout pregnancy (Allen-Walker et al., 2016). Women stated that they expected to be weighed during pregnancy and, contrary to previous claims, there was no evidence that routine weighing during antenatal care caused anxiety. From discussions it was clear that women desired more information on gestational weight gain and a healthy lifestyle, and felt that health professionals should provide this.     

Barriers and solutions for timely initiation of antenatal care in Kigali,Rwanda: Health facility professionals' perspective

Objective

timely initiation of antenatal care (i.e. within the first trimester) is associated with attendance of the full recommended regimen of antenatal visits. This study assessed social and behavioural factors that affect timely initiation of antenatal care in Kigali, Rwanda from the perspective of health facility professionals.

Design

health facility professionals involved in antenatal care provision were interviewed on their perceptions about untimely initiation of antenatal care based on open-ended questions. These one-on-one interviews were tape recorded and transcribed for analysis.

Setting

interviews were performed in June and July 2011 at Muhima Health Center in Kigali, Rwanda.

Participants

17 health facility professionals with a wide range of skills and experience levels were selected from the 36 total staff members of Muhima Health Center based on their participation in and knowledge of antenatal care.

Measurements and findings

inductive content analysis was used to group responses from these qualitative interviews with the goal of creating a conceptual map around barriers and solutions for untimely antenatal care. Qualitative responses were coded to identify the most common themes and sub-themes following a consensus methodology. The health-care professional interviews identified five themes as barriers to timely initiation of antenatal care: (1) lack of knowledge; (2) experience with previous births; (3) issues with male partners not willing/able to attend the clinic; (4) poverty or problems with health insurance; and (5) antenatal care culture. As potential solutions to these hurdles, the following themes were identified: (1) maternal/community education and sensitisation; (2) incentives to attend antenatal care visits; and (3) tracking the content and recommended number of antenatal visits.

Key conclusions

qualitative results indicate that behavioural contextual interventions may help overcome antenatal care barriers. The Rwandan Government and health facilities should work together with target communities to improve antenatal care compliance, taking into account the solutions suggested by the health facility professional interviews.

Implications for practice

study findings suggest that there are specific solutions to increase adherence with timely initiation of antenatal care in Rwanda, including education and sensitisation, modifying couples' HIV testing policies, addressing costs of antenatal care, and tracking the number of recommended antenatal visits.