Response of subtype-specific human breast cancer-derived cells to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition

When DNA damage is detected, checkpoint signal networks are activated to stop the cell cycle, and DNA repair processes begin. Inhibitory compounds targeting components of DNA damage response pathways have been identified and are being used in clinical trials, in combination with chemotherapeutic agents, to enhance cancer therapy. Inhibitors of checkpoint kinases, Chk1 and Chk2, have been shown to sensitize tumor cells to DNA damaging agents, and treatment of BRCA1/2-deficient tumor cells, as well as triple negative breast cancers, with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has shown promise. But systematic studies to determine which tumor subtypes are likely to respond to these specific inhibitors have not been reported. The current study was designed to test sensitivity of specific breast cancer subtype-derived cells to two classes of these new inhibitory drugs, PARP and Chk1 inhibitors. Luminal, HER2 overexpressing, and triple negative breast cancer-derived cells were tested for sensitivity to killing by PARP inhibitors, ABT-888 and BSI-201, and Chk1 inhibitor, PF-00477736, alone or in combination with gemcitabine or carboplatin. Each of the triple negative breast cancer cell lines showed strong sensitivity to the Chk1 inhibitor, but only the BRCA1-deficient breast cancer cell lines showed sensitivity to the PARP inhibitors, suggesting that in vitro testing of cancer cell lines of specific subtypes, with panels of the different PARP and Chk1 inhibitors, will contribute to stratification of patients for clinical trials using these classes of inhibitors.     

Deubiquitination of FBP1 by USP7 blocks FBP1–DNMT1 interaction and decreases the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to PARP inhibitors

Poly[ADP‐ribose] polymerase (PARP) inhibitors can block DNA single‐strand damage repair and subsequently increase double‐stranded breaks (DSBs) by reducing the activity of the PARP1 protease and by preventing the PARP1 protein from dissociating from chromatin. Tumors with the BRCA mutation are particularly sensitive to PARP inhibitors. So far, PARP inhibitors (Olaparib) have been used to treat pancreatic cancer patients with BRCA mutation. However, these patients are prone to PARP inhibitor resistance. Our previous studies suggest that fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) is responsible for the sensitivity to various anticancer agents, such as gemcitabine or mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. In this study, we demonstrate that FBP1 regulates the sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Then, we showed that nuclear FBP1 is responsible for this process by interacting with DNA (cytosine‐5)‐methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and trapping PARP1 in chromatin. Moreover, we revealed that ubiquitin carboxyl‐terminal hydrolase 7 (USP7) binds to and induces the deubiquitination of FBP1, which prevented FBP1 from translocating to the nucleus. Finally, we demonstrated that USP7 inhibitors enhanced the antitumor effect of PARP inhibitors in an FBP1‐dependent manner. Collectively, our results identify a novel USP7–FBP1–DNMT1 signaling axis in pancreatic cancer, which might indicate that USP7 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors might have more powerful antitumor effects than PARP inhibitors alone in pancreatic cancer patients.     

Rapid Progression of Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma During Platinum-Based Therapy in a Patient Harboring a Pathogenic BRCA2 Germline Variant

Familial pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is most commonly related to inheritance of a pathogenic BRCA variant (J Med Genet 2005;42:711–719). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends germline testing for patients diagnosed with PDAC and recommends platinum-based chemotherapy as the preferred initial systemic therapy for patients harboring a pathogenic BRCA germline variant with PDAC ( https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1455 ). PDACs related to pathogenic BRCA germline variants typically demonstrate BRCA loss of heterozygosity (LOH), which results in ineffective DNA damage repair due to a lack of normal BRCA gene product activity. By causing DNA damage, platinum-based therapies have been shown to be highly effective therapies (Cancer Cell 2010;18:499–509, Gen Med 2015;17:569). In contrast, platinum-based therapies would be predicted to be significantly less effective for PDACs in patients with pathogenic BRCA germline variants who have cancers that lack BRCA LOH. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP) is also key to effective DNA repair. The Food and Drug Administration has approved PARP inhibitors for patients carrying germline pathogenic BRCA variants and metastatic breast cancer or ovarian cancer (Ann Oncol 2019;30:558–566, J Clin Oncol 2015;33:244–250). PARP inhibitors would again be expected to be far less effective in patients who carry pathogenic BRCA germline variants with breast and ovarian cancers (those that lack BRCA LOH) than in those with BRCA-related breast and ovarian cancers (which typically demonstrate BRCA LOH), because PARP is involved in DNA repair. Here, we present a patient harboring a pathogenic BRCA germline variant whose PDAC grew rapidly during platinum-based therapy and lacked BRCA LOH and therefore was not likely BRCA related. Given the molecular fingerprint of BRCA-related PDAC in patients with pathogenic BRCA germline variants and the mechanism of action of platinum-based therapies and PARP inhibitors, this case underscores the importance of future studies aimed at determining whether the lack of BRCA LOH in PDACs in pathogenic BRCA germline variant carriers is a biomarker of less responsiveness to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors.

Key Points

• Platinum-based therapy or Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP) inhibitor therapies are highly effective systemic therapy options for most patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who carry a germline pathogenic BRCA variant.
• In the case presented here, a patient carrying a germline pathogenic BRCA variant saw rapid progression of his pancreatic adenocarcinoma while on platinum-based therapy. Next-generation sequencing confirmed that his pancreatic cancer was likely not related to BRCA loss of heterozygosity (LOH).
• Studies are needed to determine, in patients who harbor germline pathogenic BRCA variants, whether similar cancers (i.e., those that lack BRCA LOH) are less responsive to platinum-based or PARP inhibitor therapies than are those more common BRCA-related cancers (i.e., those that demonstrate LOH).

     

PARP抑制剂治疗晚期乳腺癌的作用机制及相关研究进展

多聚二磷酸腺苷核糖聚合酶（poly ADP-ribose polymerase，PARP）抑制剂可使乳腺癌细胞的单链DNA损伤修复受阻，而BRCA突变可造成乳腺癌细胞的双链DNA损伤修复功能缺失，因此PARP抑制剂治疗乳腺癌易感基因（breast cancer susceptibility gene，BRCA）突变乳腺癌是通过同时阻断单链DNA和双链DNA损伤修复，导致细胞的DNA损伤修复失败，使癌细胞死亡。目前已研发出多种敏感性和特异性较高的PARP抑制剂，该类药物主要抑制PARP1和PARP2两种亚型。本文总结PARP抑制剂用于治疗BRCA突变乳腺癌的作用机制，并对多种PARP抑制剂单用或联合化疗药物治疗晚期乳腺癌的研究进展进行综述。      

KRas induces a Src/PEAK1/ErbB2 kinase amplification loop that drives metastatic growth and therapy resistance in pancreatic cancer

Early biomarkers and effective therapeutic strategies are desperately needed to treat pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which has a dismal 5-year patient survival rate. Here, we report that the novel tyrosine kinase PEAK1 is upregulated in human malignancies, including human PDACs and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). Oncogenic KRas induced a PEAK1-dependent kinase amplification loop between Src, PEAK1, and ErbB2 to drive PDAC tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Surprisingly, blockade of ErbB2 expression increased Src-dependent PEAK1 expression, PEAK1-dependent Src activation, and tumor growth in vivo, suggesting a mechanism for the observed resistance of patients with PDACs to therapeutic intervention. Importantly, PEAK1 inactivation sensitized PDAC cells to trastuzumab and gemcitabine therapy. Our findings, therefore, suggest that PEAK1 is a novel biomarker, critical signaling hub, and new therapeutic target in PDACs.     

Inhibition of oncogenic Pim-3 kinase modulates transformed growth and chemosensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal cancer with a 5-year survival rate of only 6%. Although the cytosine analog gemcitabine is the drug commonly used to treat PDAC, chemoresistance unfortunately renders the drug ineffective. Thus, strategies that can decrease this resistance will be essential for improving the dismal outcome of patients suffering from this disease. We previously observed that oncogenic Pim-1 kinase was aberrantly expressed in PDAC tissues and cell lines and was responsible for radioresistance. Furthermore, members of the Pim family have been shown to reduce the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs in cancer. Therefore, we attempted to evaluate the role of Pim-3 in chemoresistance of PDAC cells. We were able to confirm upregulation of the Pim-3 oncogene in PDAC tissues and cell lines vs. normal samples. Biological consequences of inhibiting Pim-3 expression with shRNA-mediated suppression included decreases in anchorage-dependent growth, invasion through Matrigel and chemoresistance to gemcitabine as measured by caspase-3 activity. Additionally, we were able to demonstrate that Pim-1 and Pim-3 play overlapping but non-identical roles as it relates to gemcitabine sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells. To further support the role of Pim-3 suppression in sensitizing PDAC cells to gemcitabine, we used the pharmacological Pim kinase inhibitor SGI-1776. Treatment of PDAC cells with SGI-1776 resulted in decreased phosphorylation of the proapoptotic protein Bad and cell cycle changes. When SGI-1776 was combined with gemcitabine, there was a greater decrease in cell viability in the PDAC cells vs. cells treated with either of the drugs separately. These results suggest combining drug therapies that inhibit Pim kinases, such as Pim-3, with chemotherapeutic agents, to aid in decreasing chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer.     

A decade of clinical development of PARP inhibitors in perspective

Genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer, and often is the result of altered DNA repair capacities in tumour cells. DNA damage repair defects are common in different cancer types; these alterations can also induce tumour-specific vulnerabilities that can be exploited therapeutically. In 2009, a first-in-man clinical trial of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib clinically validated the synthetic lethal interaction between inhibition of PARP1, a key sensor of DNA damage, and BRCA1/BRCA2 deficiency. In this review, we summarize a decade of PARP inhibitor clinical development, a work that has resulted in the registration of several PARP inhibitors in breast (olaparib and talazoparib) and ovarian cancer (olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib, either alone or following platinum chemotherapy as maintenance therapy). Over the past 10 years, our knowledge on the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitor as well as how tumours become resistant has been extended, and we summarise this work here. We also discuss opportunities for expanding the precision medicine approach with PARP inhibitors, identifying a wider population who could benefit from this drug class. This includes developing and validating better predictive biomarkers for patient stratification, mainly based on homologous recombination defects beyond BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, identifying DNA repair deficient tumours in other cancer types such as prostate or pancreatic cancer, or by designing combination therapies with PARP inhibitors.     

Crosstalk of DNA double‐strand break repair pathways in poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor treatment of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2‐mutated cancer

Germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1 or BRCA2) significantly increase cancer risk in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Both genes function in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway of the DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair process. Therefore, the DNA‐repair defect characteristic of cancer cells brings about a therapeutic advantage for poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor‐induced synthetic lethality. PARP inhibitor‐based therapeutics initially cause cancer lethality but acquired resistance mechanisms have been found and need to be elucidated. In particular, it is essential to understand in detail the mechanism of DNA damage and repair to PARP inhibitor treatment. Further investigations have shown the roles of BRCA1/2 and its associations to other molecules in the DSB repair system. Notably, the repair pathway chosen in BRCA1‐deficient cells could be entirely different from that in BRCA2‐deficient cells after PARP inhibitor treatment. The present review describes synthetic lethality and acquired resistance mechanisms to PARP inhibitor through the DSB repair pathway and subsequent repair process. In addition, recent knowledge of resistance mechanisms is discussed. Our model should contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.     

Evidence for the efficacy of Iniparib, a PARP-1 inhibitor, in BRCA2-associated pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive, frequently fatal malignancy that strikes 37,000 patients annually in the U.S.A. It is poorly responsive to standard chemotherapies such as gemcitabine. Approximately 5-10% of pancreatic cancer occurs in the setting of a BRCA2 mutation. Breast and ovarian carcinomas that harbor BRCA2 mutations are susceptible to the effects of an emerging class of targeted agents, namely, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This report describes the case of a patient with a germline BRCA2 mutation and an associated pancreatic cancer treated with iniparib (BSI-201), a PARP inhibitor, who demonstrated a complete pathologic response to this agent. This case highlights the potential benefit for PARP inhibition in BRCA2-related pancreatic cancer.     

PARP inhibitors synergize with gemcitabine by potentiating DNA damage in non-small-cell lung cancer

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have demonstrated great promise in the treatment of patients with deficiencies in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, such as those with loss of BRCA1 or BRCA2 function. However, emerging studies suggest that PARP inhibition can also target HR-competent cancers, such as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and that the therapeutic effect of PARP inhibition may be improved by combination with chemotherapy agents. In our study, it was found that PARP inhibitors talazoparib (BMN-673) and olaparib (AZD-2281) both had synergistic activity with the common first-line chemotherapeutic gemcitabine in a panel of lung cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the combination demonstrated significant in vivo antitumor activity in an H23 xenograft model of NSCLC compared to either agent as monotherapy. This synergism occurred without loss of HR repair efficiency. Instead, the combination induced synergistic single-strand DNA breaks, leading to accumulation of toxic double-strand DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Our study elucidates the underlying mechanisms of synergistic activity of PARP inhibitors and gemcitabine, providing a strong motivation to pursue this combination as an improved therapeutic regimen.     

Novel splice‐switching oligonucleotide promotes BRCA1 aberrant splicing and susceptibility to PARP inhibitor action

Tumors carrying hereditary mutations in BRCA1, which attenuate the BRCA1 DNA damage repair pathway, are more susceptible to dual treatment with PARP inhibitors and DNA damaging therapeutics. Conversely, breast cancer tumors with nonmutated functional BRCA1 are less sensitive to PARP inhibition. We describe a method that triggers susceptibility to PARP inhibition in BRCA1‐functional tumor cells. BRCA1 exon 11 is a key for the function of BRCA1 in DNA damage repair. Analysis of the BRCA1 exon 11 splicing mechanism identified a key region within this exon which, when deleted, induced exon 11 skipping. An RNA splice‐switching oligonucleotide (SSO) developed to target this region was shown to artificially stimulate skipping of exon 11 in endogenous BRCA1 pre‐mRNA. SSO transfection rendered wild‐type BRCA1 expressing cell lines more susceptible to PARP inhibitor treatment, as demonstrated by a reduction in cell survival at all SSO concentrations tested. Combined SSO and PARP inhibitor treatment increased γH2AX expression indicating that SSO‐dependent skipping of BRCA1 exon 11 was able to promote DSBs and therefore synthetic lethality. In conclusion, this SSO provides a new potential therapeutic strategy for targeting BRCA1‐functional breast cancer by enhancing the effect of PARP inhibitors.     

Homologous recombination deficiency and ovarian cancer

The discovery that PARP inhibitors block an essential pathway of DNA repair in cells harbouring a BRCA mutation has opened up a new therapeutic avenue for high-grade ovarian cancers. BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are essential for high-fidelity repair of double-strand breaks of DNA through the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Deficiency in HRR (HRD) is a target for PARP inhibitors. The first PARP inhibitor, olaparib, has now been licensed for BRCA-mutated ovarian cancers. While mutated BRCA genes are individually most commonly associated with HRD other essential HRR proteins may be mutated or functionally deficient potentially widening the therapeutic opportunities for PARP inhibitors. HRD is the first phenotypically defined predictive marker for therapy with PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer. Several different PARP inhibitors are being trialled in ovarian cancer and this class of drugs has been shown to be a new selective therapy for high-grade ovarian cancer. Around 20% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers harbour germline or somatic BRCA mutations and testing for BRCA mutations should be incorporated into routine clinical practice. The expanded use of PARP inhibitors in HRD deficient (non-BRCA mutant) tumours using a signature of HRD in clinical practice requires validation.     

Biperiden and mepazine effectively inhibit MALT1 activity and tumor growth in pancreatic cancer

MALT1 is a key mediator of NF-κB signaling and a main driver of B-cell lymphomas. Remarkably, MALT1 is expressed in the majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) as well, but absent from normal exocrine pancreatic tissue. Following, MALT1 shows off to be a specific target in cancer cells of PDAC without affecting regular pancreatic cells. Therefore, we studied the impact of pharmacological MALT1 inhibition in pancreatic cancer and showed promising effects on tumor progression. Mepazine (Mep), a phenothiazine derivative, is a known potent MALT1 inhibitor. Newly, we described that biperiden (Bip) is a potent MALT1 inhibitor with even less pharmacological side effects. Thus, Bip is a promising drug leading to reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis in PDAC cells in vitro and in vivo. By compromising MALT1 activity, nuclear translocation of c-Rel is prevented. c-Rel is critical for NF-κB-dependent inhibition of apoptosis. Hence, off-label use of Bip or Mep represents a promising new therapeutic approach to PDAC treatment. Regularly, the Anticholinergicum Bip is used to treat neurological side effects of Phenothiazines, like extrapyramidal symptoms.     

Synthetic lethality strategies: Beyond BRCA1/2 mutations in pancreatic cancer

Cancer cells are often characterized by abnormalities in DNA damage response including defects in cell cycle checkpoints and/or DNA repair. Synthetic lethality between DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways has provided a paradigm for cancer therapy by targeting DDR. The successful example is that cancer cells with BRCA1/2 mutations are sensitized to poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]‐ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Beyond the narrow scope of defects in the BRCA pathway, “BRCAness” provides more opportunities for synthetic lethality strategy. In human pancreatic cancer, frequent mutations were found in cell cycle and DDR genes, including P16, P73, APC, MLH1, ATM, PALB2, and MGMT. Combined DDR inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents are under preclinical or clinical trials. Promoter region methylation was found frequently in cell cycle and DDR genes. Epigenetics joins the Knudson's “hit” theory and “BRCAness.” Aberrant epigenetic changes in cell cycle or DDR regulators may serve as a new avenue for synthetic lethality strategy in pancreatic cancer.     

Phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 confers PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1-deficient cancers

Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a promising therapeutic strategy for BRCA1 deficient cancers, however, the development of drug resistance limits clinical efficacy. Previously we found that the BRCA1-AKT1 pathway contributes to tumorigenesis and that the AKT1/mTOR is a novel therapeutic target for BRCA1-deficient cancers. Here, we report that phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6, a mTOR downstream effector, is greatly increased in BRCA1 deficient cells resistant to PARP inhibition. Phosphorylation of S6 is associated with DNA damage and repair signaling during PARP inhibitor treatment. In BRCA1 deficient cells, expression of S6 lacking all five phosphorylatable sites renders the cells sensitive to PARP inhibitor and increases DNA damage signals. In addition, the S6 mutations reduce tumor formation induced by Brca1-deficiency in mice. Inhibition of S6 phosphorylation by rapamycin restores PARP sensitivity to resistant cells. Combined treatment with rapamycin and PARP inhibitor effectively suppresses BRCA1-deficient tumor growth in mice. These results provide evidence for a novel mechanism by which BRCA1 deficient cancers acquire drug resistance and suggest a new therapeutic strategy to circumvent resistance.     

Preclinical rationale for combination of crizotinib with mitomycin C for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. We analyzed 26 MSI-High and 558 non-MSI-High CRC tumors. BRCA2 mutations were highly enriched (50%) in MSI-High CRC. Immunohistochemistry showed that BRCA2-mutated MSI-High CRC had high c-MET (64%) expression compared with BRCA-WT (17%). We hypothesized a mechanistic link between BRCA2-deficiency and c-MET overexpression and synergistic interaction between drugs that treat BRCA-deficient tumors (mitomycin C (MMC) or PARP inhibitors) and c-MET inhibitors (crizotinib). We tested CRC cell lines for sensitivity to MMC plus crizotinib or other drug combinations including PARP-inhibitors. Combined treatment of tumor cells with crizotinib and MMC led to increased apoptosis as compared with each drug alone. Additionally, combination treatment with increasing concentrations of both drugs demonstrated a synergistic anti-cancer effect (CI = 0.006–0.74). However, we found no evidence for c-MET upregulation upon effective BRCA2 knockdown in tumor cells ?/+DNA damage. Although we found no mechanistic link between BRCA2 deficiency and c-MET overexpression, c-MET is frequently overexpressed in CRC and BRCA2 is mutated especially in MSI-H CRC. The combination of crizotinib with MMC appeared synergistic regardless of MSI or BRCA2 status. Using an in-vivo CRC xenograft model we found reduced tumor growth with combined crizotinib and MMC therapy (p = 0.0088). Our preclinical results support clinical testing of the combination of MMC and crizotinib in advanced CRC. Targeting cell survival mediated by c-MET in combination with targeting DNA repair may be a reasonable strategy for therapy development in CRC or other cancers.     

Rap1GAP1在人胰腺癌组织中的表达及意义

目的通过检测Rap1GAP1在人胰腺癌中的表达情况及rap1GAP1在三种人胰腺癌细胞系中的突变情况,探讨其在人胰腺癌发生发展过程中的作用。方法(1)采用免疫组织化学Envision两步法,检测73例人胰腺癌组织及其癌旁胰腺组织中Rap1GAP1的表达情况,并分析其与胰腺癌临床病理特征之间的关系;(2)采用RT-PCR和测序法检测三种人胰腺癌细胞系中rap1GAP1的突变情况。结果(1)Rap1GAP1在癌旁胰腺组织、胰腺上皮内肿瘤(pancreatic intraepithelialneoplasia,PanIN)1a、1b、2及3级和浸润性胰腺癌中的阳性率分别为100%、93.8%、92.3%、70.0%、57.9%和13.7%。癌旁胰腺组织、各级PanIN与浸润性癌之间的表达差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);Rap1GAP1在高、中和低分化胰腺癌中阳性率分别为26.9%、7.1%和0,显示Rap1GAP1的表达与胰腺癌的分化程度有关(P<0.05)。而Rap1GAP1的表达与患者的年龄、性别、淋巴结转移情况和临床分期无关。(2)Panc-1、MiaPaCa-2细胞系中存在rap1GAP1关键区域(催化结构域)的大片段缺失,而Aspc-1细胞系含有完整的编码rap1GAP催化结构域的外显子。结论相比于癌旁胰腺组织和各级PanIN,浸润性胰腺癌中 Rap1GAP1的表达显著降低。另外,Rap1GAP1在低分化胰腺癌中的表达显著降低。提示Rap1GAP1可能是胰腺癌发生发展过程中的一个晚期事件。三种人胰腺癌细胞系中的突变分析结果提示其表达降低可能与遗传学上的大片段缺失有关。     

Notch signaling activated by replication stress-induced expression of midkine drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) nearly equals its mortality rate, partly because most PDACs are intrinsically chemoresistant and thus largely untreatable. It was found recently that chemoresistant PDAC cells overexpress the Notch-2 receptor and have undergone epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In this study, we show that these two phenotypes are interrelated by expression of Midkine (MK), a heparin-binding growth factor that is widely overexpressed in chemoresistant PDAC. Gemcitabine, the front-line chemotherapy used in PDAC treatment, induced MK expression in a dose-dependent manner, and its RNAi-mediated depletion was associated with sensitization to gemcitabine treatment. We identified an interaction between the Notch-2 receptor and MK in PDAC cells. MK-Notch-2 interaction activated Notch signaling, induced EMT, upregulated NF-κB, and increased chemoresistance. Taken together, our findings define an important pathway of chemoresistance in PDAC and suggest novel strategies for its clinical attack.