Surgical resection of solitary adrenal metastasis from esophageal carcinoma following esophagectomy

The prognosis of esophageal carcinoma following esophagectomy is poor due to a high frequency of metastasis to periesophageal lymph nodes and distant organs. However, we experienced a case with good prognosis following resection of a solitary adrenal metastatic tumor. The patient was a 70-year-old man diagnosed with type 2 esophageal cancer (Lt-Ae, T2N1M0, Stage IIB) who was treated with esophagectomy. Eight months following surgery, solitary adrenal metastasis was detected by CT, and was resected. At 42 months follow-up he has had a good quality of life in the community without evidence of recurrence. To the best of our knowledge, only five cases with resected solitary adrenal metastases including our case, have been reported, and show a greater than 1-year survival. Consequently, we suggest that resection of solitary organ metastases is a good alternative, even following esophagectomy.     

Surgical repair of redundant intra-thoracic stomach after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

We present two patients with low esophagogastric anastomosis, redundant intrathoracic stomach, and markedly symptomatic reflux and regurgitation after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The diagnosis, technique of surgical revision, and outcome is discussed.     

A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy

Background

Only few comparative studies have been reported on the outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis (MIE Ivor-Lewis) and MIE with cervical anastomosis (MIE McKeown) for patients with mid and lower esophageal cancer. The objective of this study is to compare the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes between two groups.

Methods

Clinical and surgical data of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent either MIE Ivor-Lewis or MIE McKeown between January 2013 and October 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, pathological data, operative procedures, and perioperative outcomes and survival in patients were compared between both groups.

Results

Of the 72 patients included in this retrospective analysis, 32 underwent MIE Ivor-Lewis and 40 underwent MIE McKeown. Demographics, pathologic data, inpatient mortality, and surgical morbidity in both cohorts were almost identical. A significant difference was observed in Pulmonary complication (18.8% vs. 42.5%, P=0.032), Anastomotic leakage (9.4% vs. 30%, P=0.032), Anastomotic stenosis (12.5% vs. 35%, P=0.028), recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury (6.3% vs. 22.5%, P=0.034) between MIE Ivor-Lewis and MIE McKeown groups; however, no difference in operative time (312.6±82.0 vs. 339.4±80.0, P=0.249), blood loss (246.3±82.4 vs. 272.9±136.3, P=0.443), lymph nodes harvested (19.3±8.1 vs. 20.2±7.2, P=0.655) and 90-day mortality (3.1% vs. 5%, P=0.692) was observed between two groups.

Conclusions

The procedure of MIE Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer possesses advantages in perioperative outcomes and less complications compared with MIE McKeown.     

High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality?

Aimed at reducing surgical deaths, several initiatives have attempted to establish volume-based referral strategies in high risk surgery. The detailed analysis of the literature of the last 10 years, comprising 13 papers on esophageal cancer, shows a clear reduction in postoperative mortality with increasing case volumes per year. Single papers have analyzed the main reasons for this phenomenon and showed that postoperative complication rates are lower in high-volume hospitals and management of complications is more successful. Further, long-term prognosis is also correlated to case-volume. In conclusion, the analysis shows that only with the experience of more than 20 esophagectomies per year can a significant reduction of the mortality, down to 4.9%, be achieved. Based on this survey, surgery of esophageal cancer is a task for high-volume hospitals because of decreased postoperative mortality and improved long-term prognosis compared with low volume hospitals.     

Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer

Background and objectives

Only few randomized trials or comparative studies with large number of patients have been reported on the outcomes of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) with cervical anastomosis and open 3-field esophagectomy (OE) for patients with esophageal cancer. The objective of this study is to compare the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes between TLE and OE (via right throax, abdomen, and left neck) for esophageal cancer.

Methods

Clinical and surgical data of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent either TLE or OE between February 2011 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, pathological data, operative procedures, and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and survival in patients were compared between both groups.

Results

Of the 183 patients included in this retrospective analysis, 94 underwent TLE and 89 underwent OE. Demographics, pathologic data, inpatient mortality, and overall surgical morbidity in both cohorts were almost identical. A significant difference was observed in blood loss (182.6±78.3 vs. 261.4±87.2 mL, P<0.001), hospital stay (13.9±7.5 vs. 17.1±10.2 days, P=0.017), overall surgical morbidity (25.5% vs. 46.1%, P=0.004), and rate of pulmonary and cardiac complication (9.6% vs. 27.0%, P=0.002; 4.1% vs. 12.4%, P=0.046) between TLE and OE groups; however, no difference in survival period was observed between the groups.

Conclusions

The procedure of TLE for esophageal cancer possesses advantages in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared with OE. The TLE procedure results in similar or potentially better outcomes.     

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Salvage esophagectomy is performed for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. The clinical significance and safety of salvage surgery has not been well established. We reviewed 14 cases of salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy from 1994 through 2005 and investigated complication rates and outcomes. Seven of 14 cases were completely resected with salvage surgery. Operation time and bleeding were greater in patients who experienced incomplete resection (R1/R2). Anastomosis leakage, pulmonary dysfunction and heart failure were recognized in four, two and one patients, respectively. The postoperative complications were more frequent (71.4%) in patients with incomplete resection (R1/R2) than in patients with complete resection (R0) (28.4%). Two patients with complete resection (R0) showed long-term survival. Salvage esophagectomy may be indicated when the tumor can be resected completely after definitive chemotherapy. However, all cases of T4 cancer cannot be resected completely, resulting in a high risk for complications and poor survival.     

Exposure to an atomic bomb explosion is a risk factor for in‐hospital death after esophagectomy to treat esophageal cancer

Esophagectomy, one of the most invasive of all gastrointestinal operations, is associated with a high frequency of postoperative complications and in‐hospital mortality. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether exposure to the atomic bomb explosion at Hiroshima in 1945 might be a preoperative risk factor for in‐hospital mortality after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. We thus reviewed the outcomes of esophagectomy in 31 atomic bomb survivors with esophageal cancer and 96 controls (also with cancer but without atomic bomb exposure). We compared the incidences of postoperative complications and in‐hospital mortality. Of the clinicopathological features studied, mean patient age was significantly higher in atomic bomb survivors than in controls. Of the postoperative complications noted, atomic bomb survivors experienced a longer mean period of endotracheal intubation and higher incidences of severe pulmonary complications, severe anastomotic leakage, and surgical site infection. The factors associated with in‐hospital mortality were exposure to the atomic bomb explosion, pulmonary comorbidities, and electrocardiographic abnormalities. Multivariate analysis revealed that exposure to the atomic bomb explosion was an independent significant preoperative risk factor for in‐hospital mortality. Exposure to the atomic bomb explosion is thus a preoperative risk factor for in‐hospital death after esophagectomy to treat esophageal cancer.     

Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: systematic review and pooled analysis

The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis is to determine the effect of enhanced recovery programs (ERP) on clinical outcome measures following esophagectomy. Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings, and reference lists were searched for trials comparing clinical outcome from esophagectomy followed by a conventional pathway with esophagectomy followed by an ERP. Primary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative mortality, anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications, and secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and the incidence of 30‐day readmission. Nine studies were included comprising 1240 patients, 661 patients underwent esophagectomy followed conventional pathway, and 579 patients underwent ERP. Utilization of ERP was associated with a reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leak (12.2–8.3%; pooled odds ratios = 0.61; 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96; P = 0.03) and pulmonary complications (29.1–19.6%; pooled odds ratios = 0.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.36 to 0.77; P = 0.001) and length of hospital stay, and no significant change in postoperative mortality or readmission rate. There was significant variation in the design of enhanced recovery protocols, surgical approach, and utilization of neoadjuvant therapies between the studies that are important confounding variables to be considered. This study suggests a benefit to the utilization of ERP following esophagectomy. The pathways provide a template for all medical personnel interacting with these patients in order to provide incremental changes in all aspects of clinical care that translates into global improvements seen in postoperative outcomes.     

Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with esophageal cancer

We compared the surgical outcomes between 114 patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy (group 1) and 92 others who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (group 2), and assessed the preoperative and surgical factors that influence postoperative morbidity to determine the impact of nCRT on morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy via cervical, right transthoracic, and abdominal approaches. The overall postoperative morbidity rates were 44.7% and 55.4% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.13). Rates of anastomotic leak (8.8% vs. 16.3%; P = 0.10), pneumonia (9.6% vs. 13.0%; P = 0.44), recurrent nerve palsy (15.8% vs. 10.9%; P = 0.31), and all other complications did not significantly differ between the groups. Multivariable analysis revealed cervical lymph node dissection (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–3.84; P = 0.047) as the sole independent covariate for overall morbidity. Furthermore, a history of cardiovascular disease (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.03–8.24; P = 0.045), the retrosternal reconstruction route (OR, 15.15; 95% CI, 3.56–62.50; P = 0.0002), and a longer surgical duration (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.002–1.02; P = 0.01) were independent covariates for anastomotic leakage, and advanced age (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01–1.15; P = 0.02) and lower body mass index (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01–1.33; P = 0.04) were independent covariates for pneumonia. However, whether or not patients received nCRT was irrelevant. We found that nCRT is safe for three‐incision esophagectomy and it does not increase the incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality relative to esophagectomy alone.     

Clinical analysis of reflux esophagitis following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Recently, the rate of postoperative long-term survival has increased in cases of esophageal cancer. We report on our analysis of postoperative reflux esophagitis (RE) at Tokai University. METHODS: We enrolled 48 patients who underwent gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy. The diagnosis of RE was confirmed by endoscopy. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients, 28 (58.3%) were found to have RE. Among the 28 patients with RE, only four (14.3%) reported symptoms. The distribution of the severity of RE according to the Los Angeles classification in the patients was as follows: grade M, 1 (3.6%); grade A, 2 (7.1%); grade B, 6 (21.4%); grade C, 17 (60.7%); and grade D, 2 cases (7.1%). Barrett's epithelium was detected in 9 of the 28 patients (31%) with RE and in 3 of the 20 (15%) patients with no evidence of RE. CONCLUSIONS: To detect the presence of RE as well as monitor for recurrence and development of metachronous cancer, we consider it important to perform endoscopy regularly over the long term. As Barrett's epithelium is frequently encountered, care should be exercised to detect the specialized columnar epithelium showing dysplastic changes.     

Pleural drainage after transthoracic esophagectomy: experience with a vacuum system

Conventional pleural cavity drainage after esophagectomy involves one to two large-bore drainage tubes connected to underwater bottles. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a small mobile vacuum drainage system. Out of 173 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, 167 (97%) had the vacuum drain successfully placed at the end of the operation. Of those, use of the vacuum drain was uneventful for 131 until its removal (78%). Air leaks necessitating connection to underwater drainage occurred in 34 patients (20%), but in 26 of them this was only temporary. Overall success was therefore achieved in 157 patients (94%). Median in-situ placement of the vacuum drain was 4 days, and 85% of patients had their drains removed by the seventh postoperative day. The presence of lung adhesions significantly increased the need for underwater drainage. Postoperative outcomes were no different from a historical cohort with conventional underwater drainage. No drain-related complications were reported. The vacuum drain is an alternative to the conventional, large-bore, chest tube system after transthoracic esophagectomy.     

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and head-and-neck

Head-and-neck cancer is frequently associated with esophageal cancer. Because the operative procedures for these synchronous double cancers are too invasive, definitive chemoradiotherapy tends to be applied as an initial treatment. A salvage esophagectomy for either recurrent or residual disease after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with such double cancer has never been reported. We reviewed 21 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Among them, the treatment course of five patients who underwent a salvage esophagectomy for patients with synchronous double cancers of the esophagus and head-and-neck region was analyzed. Because head-and-neck cancer was well controlled after chemoradiotherapy in all five patients, a salvage esophagectomy was indicated for either recurrent or residual esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Anastomotic leakage developed in four patients; however, no other complications including pulmonary complications were recognized. All of them were discharged to home and three of them are still alive without any recurrence for 20–43 months. A salvage esophagectomy should be considered as a treatment option for either recurrent or residual esophageal cancer with well-controlled head-and-neck cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy when complete resection of the esophagus is expected.     

Perioperative fluid management and major respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy

Esophageal surgery is often related to a high morbidity and mortality rate despite an improvement in postoperative care. Fluid administration has been described to be a factor that contributes to the development of postoperative respiratory complications after esophageal surgery. The aim was to study the relation between intraoperative and postoperative fluid administration and the development of respiratory complications after esophageal surgery. Patients undergoing esophageal surgery for cancer were selected from a prospective nonrandomized computer database. All of the patients underwent esophagectomy according to the Lewis–Tanner approach. Single‐lung ventilation was used in all of the patients during the thoracic approach. The patients were divided in two groups with respect to the development of respiratory complications. Variables studied were American Society of Anesthesiologist Score, sex, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, albumin, smoking history, time until extubation, epidural analgesia, and fluid administration intraoperatively and 5 days postoperatively. Forty‐five patients were included in the study. Respiratory complications were observed in nine patients (20%). None of the variables studied except fluid administration (P= 0.005 – odds ratio = 1.001 –95% confidence interval) were shown as a risk factor for the development of respiratory complications on the multivariate analysis. Fluid administration intraoperatively and postoperatively has shown to be a contributing factor for the development of respiratory complications after esophageal surgery.     

Effect of a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor on early recovery from body water imbalance after transthoracic esophagectomy

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of sivelestat, a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor, on body fluid balance after transthoracic esophagectomy. Esophagectomy with elective lymphadenectomy may induce excessive release of neutrophil elastase, which then promotes vascular permeability and an excessive water shift from the intravascular space to the peripheral compartment. Body fluid imbalance after esophagectomy often leads to circular instability, a decrease of urine output, and a delay in the shift to a diuretic state. The study was designed as a case‐control study with a historical control group. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine our hypothesis that sivelestat improves abnormal body fluid retention and prevents subsequent pulmonary complications. To reveal the direct influence of sivelestat on the postoperative course, we avoided using steroids or other diuretic agents. Eighty‐eight patients who underwent thoracic esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy from 2000 to 2008 were divided into two groups: those treated from 2003 to 2008, who all received postoperative administration of sivelestat (n = 60); and those treated from 2000 to 2002, who did not receive sivelestat and were used as the control group (n = 28). Both groups received fluid management using the same protocol. The time to reach a diuretic state, time until extubation of the tracheal tube, and development of delayed respiratory dysfunction were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate analysis. The time until a shift to a diuretic state was significantly shorter after treatment with sivelestat (p < 0.0001) and with a shorter operation time (p < 0.0001). The tracheal tube was extubated significantly earlier in the sivelestat group (p < 0.0001) and the incidence of delayed respiratory dysfunction was also significantly lower (p = 0.0028) in this group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a delay in a shift to a diuretic state was a strong independent risk factor for the time to tracheal extubation (odds ratio 2.539, p = 0.0056) and occurrence of delayed respiratory dysfunction (odds ratio 1.989, p = 0.0104). Sivelestat treatment was not independently associated with reduced pulmonary complications, but the diuretic state was strongly regulated by sivelestat treatment (odds ratio 0.044, p = 0.0003). Thus, administration of sivelestat has a beneficial influence on recovery from body water imbalance through a more rapid return to a diuretic state after esophagectomy, which contributes to prevention of subsequent pulmonary complications.     

Surgical repair of refractory strictures of esophagogastric anastomoses caused by leakage following esophagectomy

Refractory strictures of esophagogastric anastomosis caused by leakage following an esophagectomy are a severe complication, for which either repeated balloon dilations or bougies are not necessarily effective. In such a case, surgical repair is quite difficult because the esophageal substitute such as the stomach or colon is usually located in the mediastinum and severely adhesive to the neighboring organs. Furthermore, in case the resected stricture is too long for direct re‐anastomosis to be performed, a free jejunal graft or a new esophageal substitute should be prepared. This paper proposes a procedure for the re‐reconstruction of refractory stricture in the case of a retrosternal reconstruction with a gastric conduit, which frequently employs pull‐up route. The anterior plate of the manubrium was divided medially from the notch to the symphysis with the sternal saw. The manubrium is then removed, bite by bite, like breaking up rocks, with a bone rongeur forceps, starting with the anterior plate, then the posterior plate, from upper median part to the lower and lateral part of the sternum until it reaches the symphysis and the sternoclavicular and the sternocostal joints. It is safer to destroy the manubrium little by little from the anterior side so that the posterior periosteum, which is likely to adhere tightly to the gastric conduit, can be preserved. After the manubrium is almost completely resected and the posterior periosteum of the manubrium is preserved, a median longitudinal incision is carefully made on the periosteum so as not to damage the gastric conduit that may be adhesive to the periosteum. The periosteum was gradually opened bilaterally separating the periostium and the gastric conduit. Although gastroenterological surgeons may hesitate to remove the manubrium, removing the manubrium and preserving the posterior periosteum make it possible to avoid injuring the gastric conduit and to provide a wide view around the stenosis for safely resecting the anastomotic stricture. Furthermore, this procedure allows direct re‐anastomosis between the cervical esophagus and the gastric conduit without a complicated reconstruction such as a free jejunal graft. This procedure is strongly recommended as an alternative option so that a second reconstruction can be performed both safely and steadily.     

The effect of formalizing enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with a protocol

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways aim to accelerate functional return and discharge from hospital. They have proven effective in many forms of surgery, most notably colorectal. However, experience in esophagectomy has been limited. A recent study reported significant reductions in pulmonary complications, mortality, and length of stay following the introduction of an ERAS protocol alone, without the introduction of any clinical changes. We instituted a similar change 16 months ago, introducing a protocol to provide a formal framework, for our existing postoperative care. This retrospective analysis compared outcome following esophagectomy for the 16 months before and 20 months after this change. Data were collected from prospectively maintained secure web‐based multidisciplinary databases. Complication severity was classified using the Clavien‐Dindo scale. Operative mortality was defined as death within 30 days of surgery, or at any point during the same hospital admission. Lower respiratory tract infection was defined as clinical evidence of infection, with or without radiological signs. Respiratory complications included lower respiratory tract infection, pleural effusion (irrespective of drainage), pulmonary collapse, and pneumothorax. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v21. One hundred thirty‐two patients underwent esophagectomy (55 protocol group; 77 before). All were performed open. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, operation, use of neoadjuvant therapy, cell type, stage, tumor site, or American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Median length of stay was 14.0 days (protocol) compared with 12.0 before (interquartile range 9–19 and 9.5–15.5, respectively; P = 0.073, Mann–Whitney U‐test). Readmission within 30 days of discharge occurred in five (9.26%) and six (8.19%; P = 1.000, Fisher's exact test). There were four in‐hospital deaths (3.03%): one (1.82%) and three (3.90%), respectively (P = 0.641). There were no differences in the severity of complications (P = non‐significant; Pearson's chi‐squared). There were no differences in the type of complications occurring in either group. The protocol was completed successfully by 26 (47.3%). No baseline factors were predictive of this. In contrast to previous studies, we did not demonstrate any improvement in outcome by formalizing our existing pathway using a written protocol. Consequently, improvements in short‐term outcome from esophagectomy within ERAS would seem to be primarily due to improvements in components of perioperative care. Consequently, we would recommend that centers introducing new (or reviewing existing) ERAS pathways for esophagectomy focus on optimizing clinical aspects of such standardized pathways.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy does not increase morbidity in patients over 70

Esophagectomy in elderly esophageal carcinoma patients is correlated with a high morbidity and even mortality. Studies on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NT) in elderly patients are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of advanced age in combination with NT in esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent an esophagectomy. Patients who underwent NT prior to esophagectomy between 1993 and 2010 were divided into three groups: <70, 70–74, and ≥75 years. Toxicity of NT and postoperative morbidity were compared between groups. Primary endpoints were toxicity, complication rate, and survival. Two hundred thirteen patients underwent NT during the study period, 26 were aged 70–74 years, and 17 were ≥70 years. Toxicity of NT was comparable for younger and elderly patients (46% vs. 54% vs. 47%, P = 0.263). Overall complications occurred in 62% of younger patients versus 73% and 71% among patients aged 70–74 years and ≥75 years, respectively (P = 0.836). Cardiac complications occurred in 14% of younger patients versus 27% and 41% of elderly patients (P = 0.021). Three‐year survival rates were 59% versus 44% versus 31% among patients aged <70, 70–74, and ≥75 years, respectively (P = 0.237). Higher age (odds ratio 1.750, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for development of cardiac complications. Toxicity of NT and postoperative complications are comparable for patients aged <70, 70–74, and ≥75 years, with the exception of cardiac complications. Therefore, we consider NT followed by esophagectomy in elderly patients a safe treatment modality in our center.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes after conservative and surgical treatment of isolated anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

The clinical course and outcome of isolated anastomotic leaks (IALs) after esophagectomy are significantly different from those of necrotic leaks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and long‐term outcome in patients with IALs after esophagectomy with reconstruction for esophageal cancer. A total of 663 patients underwent esophagectomy with esophageal reconstruction because of esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2010 at the Seoul Asan Medical Center. IALs occurred in 23 patients (3.5%). All patients with IAL were male, with a median age of 61 years. Patients with IAL were divided into three groups based on their clinical course. group A comprised patients who had definite clinical symptoms and/or signs indicating mediastinal contamination or leak before routine contrast esophagography was performed. Groups B and C comprised patients who had no definite clinical symptoms and/or signs of leaks before the routine contrast examination. Furthermore, group B contained those patients who resumed oral intake because no leak was found in the routine contrast examination and was diagnosed some days after resuming oral intake. Group C contained those patients who kept fasting because the leak was found in the routine contrast examination. The median follow‐up period was 30 months. The mean time to closure of the IAL was 70.1 ± 96.0 days (range 4–364). There was a 72.7% overall closure rate within 60 days. By univariate analysis, the mean time to closure of the IAL was found to be significantly longer for group A patients or in cases where the patients had an uncontained leak, leukocytosis, or empyema. However, there was no statistically significant differences in age, neoadjuvant treatment, site of anastomosis (cervical vs. thoracic), fever, or treatment of the leak. By multivariate analysis, group A was found to be an independent predictive factor for the time to closure of the IAL. Repeat contrast studies revealed no anastomotic leaks in 18 patients and the formation of contained fistula in four cases (excluding one patient who died in hospital). The four patients with a contained fistula showed no clinical symptoms or signs, and tolerated resumed oral intake. IALs were resolved in most cases with low leak‐related mortality, and resolution of the leaks occurred within 2 months in the majority of patients.     

Optimal surgical approach for esophageal cancer in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy and neoadjuvant therapy

The optimal surgical technique for the potentially curative treatment of patients with esophageal cancer is still under debate. The transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) with limited lymphadenectomy mainly focuses on a decrease of postoperative morbidity and mortality by preventing a formal thoracotomy. The transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) with extended two‐field lymphadenectomy attempts to improve the radicality of the resection and thus to increase locoregional tumor control, but is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. The recent introduction of different minimally invasive techniques probably decreases postoperative morbidity following TTE, with reduction of especially pulmonary complications, but high‐quality evidence is still limited. It is widely agreed that extended lymphadenectomy as performed during TTE provides the benefit of more accurate staging, but its effect on improvement of survival is still debated. The literature on this topic is contradictory and the choice of surgical approach is primarily driven by personal opinions and institutional preferences. Moreover, the available evidence is mainly based on patients who underwent surgery alone without neoadjuvant therapy. Results of recent studies suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy abolishes any possibly positive effect of extended lymphadenectomy as performed during TTE on survival, but this effect should be confirmed in future research. This review gives an overview and reflects the authors' personal view on the role of TTE and THE in the treatment of potentially curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy and neoadjuvant treatment and outlines future research perspectives.     

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for a giant upper esophageal leiomyoma

SUMMARY.  This is the first report of a thoracoscopic esophagectomy for a giant leiomyoma of the upper esophagus aided by a robotic system. A 37-year-old man presented with progressive dysphagia and nocturnal aspiration. Endoscopic ultrasound and CT scan of the chest revealed an upper esophageal tumor of 9 × 4 cm arising from the muscularis mucosae. A fine needle aspiration showed clustering of mesenchymal cells, confirming the diagnosis of a stromal cell tumor. A mesenchymal malignancy was suspected because the tumor was located in the upper esophagus and was arising from the muscularis mucosae, both uncommon for a leiomyoma. Moreover, tumor size, an indicator of potential malignancy if >3 cm, was 9 cm. Therefore, an esophagectomy was performed thoracoscopically with the formation of a gastric conduit via laparotomy and a hand-sewn end-to-side cervical anastomosis. The thoracoscopic phase was performed with support of the da Vinci™ robotic system, which allowed for an excellent 3-dimensional view and a precise dissection of the esophagus along the vital mediastinal structures. The duration of the thoracoscopic part was 115 min and that of the total procedure was 270 min. Blood loss during the thoracoscopic phase was 50 mL; total blood loss was 200 mL. The patient was ventilated for 1 day; his total intensive care stay was 2 days. He left the hospital in good condition on the 11th postoperative day. Histopathological examination combined with immunohistochemistry revealed a leiomyoma of 9.0 × 5.0 × 2.5 cm. After 3 years of follow-up, the patient is in good health.