Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy

The goal of surveillance examinations after polypectomy is to detect new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas, as well as preventing adenomas from becoming invasive or cancerous. The first colonoscopy surveillance program reported was the National Polyp Study from the United States in 1997, with an update in 2003. First screening colonoscopy and polypectomy have been shown to produce the greatest effects in reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomatous polyps. However, a large number of adenomas are being discovered as a result of the increased use of colorectal cancer screening, particularly with the dramatic increase in screening colonoscopy and surveillance. Increased efficiency of surveillance colonoscopy practices is therefore needed to decrease the cost, risk, and overuse of medical resources. In developing surveillance programs, studying miss rates and incidences and performing separate evaluations are important, along with accurately assessing incidence. This is because the recurrence rate or apparent incidence after colonoscopic polypectomy includes the true incidence of new polyp formation plus the incidence of missed polyps from the initial colonoscopy. Many studies have indicated the number of adenomas on initial examination as the most significant predictor for missed adenoma and incidence of adenoma on surveillance colonoscopy. In Japan, many facets of colonoscopic examination differ from those in Western countries. Further studies are recommended to establish an appropriate and original Japanese colonoscopy surveillance program for use after polypectomy, based on guidelines from the United States.     

Relationship of human rectal aberrant crypt foci and formation of colorectal polyp:One-year following up after polypectomy

AIM:To clarify the relationship of human rectal aberrant crypt foci and formation of colorectal polyp.METHODS:Eighty-nine subjects were recruited from the population of Japanese individuals who underwent polypectomy at Yokohama City University Hospital.All patients had baseline adenomas removed at year 0 colonoscopy.Aberrant crypt foci(ACF) were defined as lesions in which the crypts were more darkly stained with methylene blue than normal crypts and had larger diameters,often with oval or slit-like lumens and a thicker epithelial lining.RESULTS:A total of 366 ACFs were identified in 89 patients;all had baseline adenomas removed at the first examination(year 0) colonoscopy and returned for the second(year 1).ACF in the lower rectum were assessed at year 0 and study group were divided into two groups depend on ACF numbers,0-3 or over 3.All participants were examined in the number and maximum size of adenoma.There was no statistical difference in number and maximum size of ACF at year 0,however,maximum size of adenoma was larger in over 3 group than 0-3 group at year 1.CONCLUSION:The number of ACF may be a predictive factor of relatively large adenoma incidence in the pilot phase study.     

Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population

Background and aim  

Repeat colonoscopy is often performed within a short time after polypectomy due to the fear that colorectal adenomas were missed during the initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed. The aim of this study was to estimate the actual recurrence rate of adenoma and its association with the length of the surveillance interval after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.     

Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy

BACKGROUND: Residual adenoma is frequently found at the site of endoscopically resected large sessile adenomas on follow-up examination. We evaluated the efficacy of a thermal energy source, the argon plasma coagulator, to destroy visible residual adenoma after piecemeal resection of sessile polyps. METHODS: Seventy-seven piecemeal polypectomies with or without the use of argon plasma coagulator were analyzed retrospectively. All polyps were sessile, 20 mm or greater in size. The results from three groups of patients were compared. The study group was composed of patients who had visible residual adenoma after piecemeal polypectomy and had the base of the polypectomy site treated with the argon plasma coagulator. The first comparison group consisted of patients who underwent standard piecemeal polypectomy in whom the colonoscopist thought that all adenomatous tissue was removed and no further treatment was necessary. The second comparison group included patients in whom visible residual adenoma was left at the base after piecemeal resection of large adenomas. Follow-up colonoscopy was performed approximately 6 months after the initial procedure to check for recurrent/residual adenomatous tissue. RESULTS: The argon plasma coagulator was used after 30 piecemeal polypectomies in an attempt to eradicate visible residual adenomatous tissue; at follow-up, 50% of these cases had complete eradication of adenoma. The group in whom all visible tumor was removed by piecemeal polypectomy alone had an adenoma eradication rate of 54% on follow-up colonoscopy. In the patients in whom visible residual adenoma was left at the site the recurrence rate was 100% on the follow-up examination. Bleeding necessitating endoscopic therapy occurred once (3.3%) in the argon plasma coagulator group; there were four (12.5%) bleeding episodes and one (3.1%) confined retroperitoneal perforation in the complete piecemeal polypectomy group and no complications in the group in which polypectomy was incomplete. CONCLUSIONS: Argon plasma coagulator ablation of residual adenomatous tissue at the polypectomy base is safe and useful. It helps to complete the eradication of large sessile polyps when there is visible evidence of residual polyp.     

New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE: The fear that colorectal adenomas were missed on initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed is often a rationale for repeating a colonoscopic examination. The aim of this study was to delineate risk factors associated with recurrence of colorectal adenomas after an initial baseline screening colonoscopy. METHODS: The study population comprised 875 subjects who underwent a baseline screening colonoscopy followed by a second examination 1-5 yr later. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the influence of potential risk factors on the occurrence or recurrence of colorectal adenomas, the strength of the influence being expressed as an OR with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Colorectal adenomas were detected in 484 of all patients (55%) at baseline colonoscopy. Within a 1- to 5-yr time interval, 181 patients (37%) had recurrent adenomas (adenomas were removed during the first colonoscopy) and 73 patients (19%) had newly developed adenomas (adenomas were absent on the first colonoscopy). The occurrence of adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy was the only factor associated with an increased risk for the recurrence of adenomas at follow-up (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.77-3.55). Recurrence was associated with multiple baseline adenomas (4.45, 2.98-6.64) and baseline adenomas larger than 1 cm (2.62, 1.99-3.11). Recurrence was not associated with histology type or family history of colorectal cancer. There was a significant trend for adenomas to recur in the same proximal or distal segment as the baseline adenomas (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Colon adenomas tend to recur with greater frequency if the adenomas removed at baseline were either large or multiple. Although patients with large adenomas or multiple adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy are at a 2.6- to 4.5-fold risk for recurrence of adenomas, the rate of de novo adenoma formation in patients without baseline adenomas may be large enough to warrant repeat colonoscopy at some time in the future. The exact timing of the follow-up colonoscopy needs to be determined.     

Risk and cause of interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polypectomy

Background: To investigate the cause and risk of interval colorectal cancer (ICC) in patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years after colonoscopic polypectomy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data (endoscopy, pathology, demography) of patients who received surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years after colonoscopic polypectomy. Results: Among 1,794 patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years after colonoscopic polypectomy, 14 suffered from ICC. The mean follow-up time was 2.67 years and the incidence density of ICC was 2.9 cases per 1,000 person-years. 50% of ICCs were found in patients in whom adenomas had been incompletely removed by endoscopic therapy, 36% were missed cancers, and 14% were new cancers. Age >60 years (OR 2.97, 95% CI 2.31-3.82) was significantly associated with interval cancer on the surveillance colonoscopy as were advanced adenoma (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01-1.62), the presence of villous (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03-1.85) and high-grade dysplasia (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07-2.42). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy within 5 years after polypectomy, the incidence density of ICC was 2.9 cases per 1,000 person-years. The majority of interval cancers originated from incomplete resection of advanced adenomas and missed cancers, which can be prevented by improving endoscopic techniques and selecting an appropriate follow-up time interval.     

Endoscopic Removal of Large Colorectal Polyps

PURPOSE: Because of the potential risk of malignancy and technical difficulties in achieving complete removal, large colorectal polyps represent a special problem for the endoscopist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capabilities and risks of endoscopy in complete removal of large colorectal polyps. METHODS: Endoscopic polypectomy of 186 colorectal polyps larger than 3 cm in diameter (range, 3-13 cm) was performed; 141 were sessile and 45 pedunculated. Most of the polyps were located in the rectum (n = 88), sigmoid (n = 63), and cecum (n = 9). The remaining adenomas were situated in other parts of the colon. Sessile polyps were removed using the piecemeal technique. RESULTS: Histology results showed an adenoma in 167 cases, and invasive carcinoma was present in the adenoma in 19 patients. Of the adenomas, 29 were tubulous, 118 tubulovillous, and 20 villous; adenoma with severe dysplasia was found in 49 cases. Complete endoscopic removal was achieved in all sessile and pedunculated polyps. None of the patients with invasive carcinoma who underwent surgical resection (n = 10) had any evidence of tumor in the resected specimen. Bleeding occurred in 4 patients after polypectomy (2 percent). Perforation occurred in 1 patient (0.5 percent), who had an invasive carcinoma of the cecum. There was no procedure-related mortality. During a mean follow-up period of 40 (range, 3-87) months, 6 patients presented with recurrence of a benign adenoma (3 percent), which was treated endoscopically, and 1 patient presented with a recurrent invasive carcinoma, which was treated surgically. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic polypectomy is a safe and effective method of treating large colorectal polyps.     

Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese

BACKGROUND: Whereas high recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas after polypectomy are widely recognised, little is known of the natural incidence in those with no neoplastic lesions initially. It is also known that single colonoscopy has a significant miss rate. AIMS: To elucidate the incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal neoplasms from a large cohort of asymptomatic Japanese patients on the basis of annually repeated colonoscopies. METHODS: A total of 6225 subjects (4659 men and 1566 women) participating in an annual colonoscopic screening programme and completing three or more colonoscopies were analysed during the 14 year period between 1988 and 2002. Patients were divided into three groups according to the findings of the initial two colonoscopies: 4084 subjects with no neoplasm, 1818 with small adenomas <10 mm, and 323 with advanced lesions, including carcinoma in situ, severe dysplasia, or large adenomas > or =10 mm. Mean age at the second colonoscopy was 48.8 years. RESULTS: For all types of colorectal neoplasms, the incidence rate in those with no initial neoplasm was 7.2%/year whereas recurrence rates in those with small adenomas and advanced lesions were 19.3% and 22.9%/year, respectively. For advanced colorectal lesions, the incidence rate was 0.21%/year whereas recurrence rates in those with small adenomas and advanced lesions were 0.64% and 1.88%/year, respectively. Colorectal neoplasms were in general more likely to develop in males and older subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Although recurrence rates after polypectomy were elevated, the incidence rates in subjects with no neoplastic lesions initially were quite high.     

Proliferative Activity in Colonic Adenomas as a Predictor of Metachronous Adenomas as Assessed by Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Immunohistochemistry

Objectives : The aim of this study was to determine whether cell proliferation in colonic adenomas, as estimated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), predicts the development of metachronous colonic adenomas. Methods : Forty patients who underwent prior endoscopic polypectomy for colonic adenomas were reevaluated by colonoscopy 2 yr later. The expression of PCNA was studied in all adenomas that were removed. A five-point semiquantitative scale of 1–5 was used to estimate the PCNA score by the percentage of positively stained cells. Results : Among the 40 patients studied, 16 developed recurrent adenomas (group A) and 24 were free of adenomas (group B). At initial colonoscopy, a total number of 51 adenomas (25 in group A and 26 in group B), were found. The median PCNA score in group A and group B index adenomas was 4 (interquartile range, 3–5) and 2 (interquartile range, 1–3), respectively ( p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test). A stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that PCNA score is a significant risk factor ( p = 0.007, odds ratio 15.8, 95% confidence interval 2.2–112.4) in predicting adenoma recurrence. The median PCNA score in metachronous adenomas was 2 (interquartile range, 1–3). The difference in the PCNA score between group A index and metachronous adenomas was again statistically significant ( p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test). Conclusions : We conclude that the increased expression of PCNA in colonic adenomas may be a predictor for metachronous adenomas.     

Adenoma incidence decreases under the effect of polypectomy

AIM:To investigate whether,under the influence of pol-ypectomy,the incidence of adenoma decreases with age.METHODS:Consecutive patients with colonic adenomas identified at index colonoscopy were retrospectively selected if they had undergone three or more complete colonoscopies,at least 24 mo apart.Patients who had any first-degree relative with colorectal cancer were excluded.Data regarding number of adenomas at each colonoscopy,their location,size and histological classification were recorded.The monthly incidence density of adenomas after the index examination was estimated for the study population,by using the person-years method.Baseline adenomas were excluded from incidence calculations but their characteristics were correlated with recurrence at follow-up,using the χ 2 test.RESULTS:One hundred and fifty-six patients were included(109 male,mean age at index colonoscopy 56.8 ± 10.3 years),with follow-up that ranged from 48 to 232 mo.No significant correlations were observed between the number,the presence of villous component,or the size of adenomas at index colonoscopy and the presence of adenomas at subsequent colonoscopies(P = 0.49,0.12 and 0.78,respectively).The incidence of colonic adenomas was observed to decay from 1.4% person-months at the beginning of the study to values close to 0%,at 12 years after index colonoscopy.CONCLUSION:Our results suggest the sporadic formation of adenomas occurs within a discrete period and that,when these adenomas are removed,all neoplasia-prone clones may be extinguished.     

内镜下切除结直肠高危腺瘤随访166例

目的:探讨结直肠高危腺瘤内镜下切除后的复发特点.对今后高危腺瘤患者规范筛查和合理随访提出指导.方法:收集2004-01/2009-01发现结直肠高危腺瘤并经内镜下切除的患者详细临床资料.对于腺瘤切除后继续在我院内镜随访的患者进行登记.结果:共收集结直肠高危腺瘤497例患者,其中166例腺瘤切除后继续在我院行内镜随访.随访的166例患者一般资料分布:年龄32-82(平均61.64±11.07)岁,其中年龄≥55岁患者128例(128/166,77.11%),男性94例(94/166,56.63%),高危腺瘤以便血为首发症状的患者较多见(71/166,46.38%),且腺瘤表面易形成分叶(75/166,54.82%).首次复查时间为切除后1-28mo,共102例患者(102/166,61.45%)复发.高危腺瘤切除后的复发部位特点:初发于左半结肠的腺瘤易复发于左半结肠,初发于右半结肠的腺瘤易复发于右半结肠(r=0.440,0.387,均P<0.01),将高危腺瘤切除前后的病理表现进行比较未见明显相关性.Cox模型的风险量曲线图提示随时间的延长,从6mo开始患者息肉复发的风险逐渐增大.结论:结直肠高危腺瘤切除后存在...     

A prospective, partly randomized study of the effectiveness of repeated examination of the colon after polypectomy and radical surgery for cancer

Results of 629 colonoscopies and 130 double-contrast examinations, performed during the first 2 years of a prospective, partly randomized cancer prophylactic programme, are reported. The patients were not more than 75 years old and had no previous diagnosis of adenoma or cancer. Repeated colonoscopy 3 months after polypectomy in 80 patients increased the chance of obtaining a complete colonoscopy from 70% to 86%, and the hepatic flexure was reached in a further 9%. Thirteen had polypectomy during the second colonoscopy. The gain in number of patients with adenomas was highest in those with sessile villous adenomas, carcinoma in situ, and mucosal carcinoma. Repeated colorectal examinations every 6 months in these resulted in recurrence rates of 13 of 33, 3 of 23, and 2 of 15 (18 months), respectively. The same figures for patients with stalked polyps, allocated to examination every 6 months, were 3 of 34, 1 of 21, and 2 of 14. Colonoscopy was also performed within 3 months of radical surgery for colorectal cancer, and 35 of 142 patients had polypectomy. Repeated examinations every 6 months resulted in recurrence rates for adenomas of 11 of 85, 3 of 46, and 1 of 34. One new cancer after 12 months could be treated radically. Five uncomplicated laparotomies were performed after the 629 colonoscopies because of perforation or bleeding.     

结直肠腺瘤切除术后息肉复发及内镜监测的临床分析

目的研究结直肠腺瘤(colorectal adenoma,CRA)切除术后息肉复发的情况,以确定合理的内镜监测间隔时间。方法收录2005年5月-2012年5月于北京朝阳医院消化内科完成结肠镜下息肉切除术、病理组织学确诊为CRA、术后再次入院行肠镜复查的患者共143例,男89例,女54例。统计分析复发息肉的累计复发率,确定影响复发息肉的重要危险因素和中位复发时间。结果息肉总体复发率为72%,患者性别、年龄、息肉大小、息肉数目、息肉发生部位、病理类型等因素中,仅CRA的大小和病理类型对复发有重要影响。初检CRA直径1 cm的患者较CRA直径≤1 cm的患者复发风险高(P=0.02)。CRA病理中含有绒毛成分的患者较仅为管状腺瘤的患者复发风险高(P=0.08)。结论建议含绒毛成分或直径1 cm的CRA患者术后6~12个月复查肠镜,而直径≤1 cm的管状腺瘤患者可在术后2年左右复查肠镜。     

The effect of metformin on the recurrence of colorectal adenoma in diabetic patients with previous colorectal adenoma

Purpose

Existing studies suggest that metformin lowers the risk and mortality of colorectal cancer. However, the effect of metformin on the suppression and prevention of colorectal adenomas is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of metformin on the recurrence of colorectal adenoma in diabetic patients with previous colorectal adenoma.

Methods

Among 423 diabetic patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy after resection of colorectal adenoma between 2005 and 2011, 257 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: one group comprising 106 patients who took metformin and another group comprising 151 patients who did not take metformin. The clinical characteristics, colorectal adenoma recurrence, and valuable factors for adenoma recurrence were analyzed.

Results

At surveillance colonoscopy after colonoscopic polypectomy for adenoma, 38 patients (35.8%) exhibited colorectal adenoma among 106 patients who took metformin, compared with 85 patients (56.3%) with colorectal adenoma among 151 patients who did not take metformin (odds ratio 0.434, 95% confidence interval 0.260–0.723, P = 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that metformin was associated with decreased recurrence of colorectal adenoma (hazard ratio 0.572, 95% confidence interval 0.385–0.852, P = 0.006) in diabetic patients with previous colorectal adenoma. The cumulative probability of colorectal adenoma recurrence was significantly lower in the metformin group than in the non-metformin group (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Metformin use in diabetic patients with previous colorectal adenoma is associated with a lower risk of colorectal adenoma recurrence.

     

Colonoscopy surveillance for high risk polyps does not always prevent colorectal cancer

AIM To determine the frequency and risk factors for colorectal cancer(CRC) development among individuals with resected advanced adenoma(AA)/traditional serrated adenoma(TSA)/advanced sessile serrated adenoma(ASSA). METHODS Data was collected from medical records of 14663 subjects found to have AA, TSA, or ASSA at screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or known genetic predisposition for CRC were excluded from the study. Factors associated with CRC developing after endoscopic management of high risk polyps were calculated in 4610 such patients who had at least one surveillance colonoscopy within 10 years following the original polypectomy of the incident advanced polyp. RESULTS84/4610(1.8%) patients developed CRC at the polypectomy site within a median of 4.2 years(mean 4.89 years), and 1.2%(54/4610) developed CRC in a region distinct from the AA/TSA/ASSA resection site within a median of 5.1 years(mean 6.67 years). Approximately, 30%(25/84) of patients who developed CRC at the AA/TSA/ASSA site and 27.8%(15/54) of patients who developed CRC at another site had colonoscopy at recommended surveillance intervals. Increasing age; polyp size; male sex; right-sided location; high degree of dysplasia; higher number of polyps resected; and piecemeal removal were associated with an increased risk for CRC developmentat the same site as the index polyp. Increasing age; right-sided location; higher number of polyps resected and sessile endoscopic appearance of the index AA/TSA/ASSA were significantly associated with an increased risk for CRC development at a different site. CONCLUSION Recognition that CRC may develop following AA/TSA/ASSA removal is one step toward improving our practice efficiency and preventing a portion of CRC related morbidity and mortality.     

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society

Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which showed clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance take place 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003 these guidelines were updated and colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, stratification at baseline into low risk and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was designed to address all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be stratified more definitely at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower risk or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either 3 or more adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or an adenoma 1 cm or larger in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have 1 or 2 small (<1 cm) tubular adenomas with no high-grade dysplasia can have a follow-up evaluation in 5-10 years, whereas people with hyperplastic polyps only should have a 10-year follow-up evaluation, as for average-risk people. There have been recent studies that have reported a significant number of missed cancers by colonoscopy. However, high-quality baseline colonoscopy with excellent patient preparation and adequate withdrawal time should minimize this and reduce clinicians concerns. These guidelines were developed jointly by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society to provide a broader consensus and thereby increase the use of the recommendations by endoscopists. The adoption of these guidelines nationally can have a dramatic impact on shifting available resources from intensive surveillance to screening. It has been shown that the first screening colonoscopy and polypectomy produces the greatest effects on reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomatous polyps.     

Follow-up of a cohort of 2604 colorectal adenomas treated in 1991 and 1992. Search for parameters related to adenomatous recurrence

AIM: To evaluate the recurrence of colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection of adenomas. METHODS: The establishment of a register of colorectal cancers and pre-cancerous lesions for Loire-Atlantique (a French administrative division) led to the recording of files for all subjects with colorectal adenomas. The files for the cohort followed up for the years 1991 and 1992 were re-examined at the end of 1998 to determine the risk factors for recurrence. Data from control colonoscopies were recorded. RESULTS: The files of 2 208 (84.9%) of the 2 604 subjects included in the study were examined in 1998. One thousand and four hundred fifty- two subjects had at least one control colonoscopy after a mean period of 28 months: 743 (28.5%) had colorectal neoplasia recurrence, including 18 with a cancer and 50 (2%) with high-grade dysplasia adenomas. The parameters related to recurrence risk were: polyp size, number and topographic distribution of adenomas, pedunculated type, histopathological classification, especially the degree of dysplasia. CONCLUSION: Recurrence of neoplasic lesions (cancer, high grade dysplasia adenomas) may be observed after adenoma resection.     

Complication and local recurrence rate after endoscopic resection of large high-risk colorectal adenomas of ≥3 cm in size

Purpose

Endoscopic resection is a widely used technique for treatment of large colorectal adenomas, but few data are available including only lesions larger than ≥2 cm. The aim of this study is to evaluate the complication and recurrence rate after endoscopic resection of high-risk colorectal adenomas ≥3 cm in size.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing polypectomy of large colorectal polyps of ≥3 cm.

Results

In 341 patients, 360 colorectal adenomas with a mean size of 3.9 cm were resected endoscopically. In 25 patients, a complication including 22 delayed bleedings (6.5 %) and three perforations (0.9 %) occurred. Single-variate analysis showed an increasing risk of complications for larger adenomas (3.9 vs. 4.6 cm; p?≤?0.05). Two hundred twelve patients with 224 adenomas had undergone at least one documented follow-up endoscopy with a medium follow-up period of 16 months. In 95 resected lesions (42.4 %), a residual adenoma occurred in the first follow-up colonoscopy (n?=?88, 92.6 %) or a recurrent adenoma occurred after at least one negative follow-up colonoscopy (n?=?7, 7.4 %). In multivariate analysis, risk factors were lesion size, sessile growth pattern, and the performing endoscopist. The complication and recurrence rate correlated inversely between endoscopists.

Conclusions

The present study is the largest study showing complication and recurrence rates after colorectal polypectomy of advanced colorectal adenomas of ≥3 cm in size. Polyp size was identified as the most important risk factor for complications. For the first time, this study shows that the complication rate after colorectal polypectomy of large adenomas is correlated inversely with the residual and/or recurrence rate.

     

The effect of attending a flexible sigmoidoscopic screening program on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas at 13-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES: Understanding the epidemiology of colorectal adenomas is a prerequisite for designing follow-up programs after polypectomy. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of polypectomy on the long-term prevalence of adenomas. METHODS: In 1983, a total of 799 men and women aged 50-59 yr were drawn from the general population register. Of these, 400 comprised a screening group and 399 a matched control group. The screenees were invited to undergo a once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy. Persons with polyps had a baseline colonoscopy with follow-ups in 1985 and 1989. In 1996, both the screenees and the controls were invited to a colonoscopic examination. RESULTS: In 1996, a total of 451 (71%) individuals attended. Adenomas were found in 78 (37%) individuals in the screening group and 103 (43%) in the control group, relative risk (95% confidence interval): 0.9 (0.7-1.1), p = 0.3, and high-risk adenomas (severe dysplasia, adenomas > or = 10 mm, villous components) were found in 16 (8%) and 32 (13%), respectively; relative risk (95% confidence interval): 0.6 (0.3-1.0), p = 0.07. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in adenoma prevalence between the group after the screening program and the controls after the usual care. There was a trend toward more high-risk adenomas in the control group. This suggests a very limited effect of one-time screening sigmoidoscopy with surveillance colonoscopy on the prevalence of adenomas, but a preventive effect on the development of high-risk adenomas consistent with the reported effect on cancer prevention.     

Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations

BACKGROUND: Recurrence is frequent after piecemeal snare resection of large sessile colorectal polyps. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) in preventing recurrence when applied to the edge and base of the polypectomy site after apparently complete piecemeal resection. METHODS: Patients with large (>1.5 cm) sessile polyps removed by piecemeal snare cautery were placed into 2 groups. The first consisted of patients with polyps believed by the endoscopist to be completely excised. These patients were randomized to either no further therapy (control) or to APC of the rim and any residual mucosal or submucosal tissue in the base of the polypectomy site. The second group comprised patients in whom polyps, as judged by the endoscopist, were incompletely excised by snare polypectomy; APC was routinely applied without randomization to all visible remaining adenomatous tissue. Follow-up colonoscopy was performed within 3 months and 1 year; biopsy specimens were taken routinely from the resection site and further polypectomy was performed as indicated. RESULTS: There were fewer recurrences after APC in the randomized group (1/10 APC, 7/11 no APC; p = 0.02). In the group with initial incomplete snare polypectomy, recurrence was detected at 3 months in 6 of 13 despite APC. One patient was hospitalized with abdominal pain and minor rectal bleeding but required no intervention. There were no other episodes of significant late bleeding caused by piecemeal polypectomy. One patient was referred for surgery after unsuccessful endoscopic management. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with apparent complete endoscopic snare resection of large adenomas, postpolypectomy application of APC reduces adenomatous recurrence.