The clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with laryngeal symptoms who are referred to gastroenterology

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has increased recently in Asia‐Pacific countries. However, little is known about its prevalence and clinical characteristics in GERD patients with atypical symptoms in Asia. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of GERD in patients who had laryngeal symptoms in Korea. Data were gathered retrospectively from patients who presented with atypical symptoms, such as throat discomfort, globus pharyngeus, hoarseness, and chronic cough. They underwent a 24‐hour ambulatory intraesophageal pH monitoring and filled in a validated reflux questionnaire. Overall, 128 patients (36 men and 92 women) with laryngeal symptoms were included. Of these 128, 43 patients (34%) had erosive esophagitis or pathological reflux from 24‐hour ambulatory pH monitoring, and 24 (19%) had a positive Bernstein test or positive symptom index from 24‐hour pH monitoring. Sixty‐one patients (48%) had no evidence of reflux esophagitis on upper endoscopy and pathological acid reflux on 24‐hour pH monitoring. Fifty‐six patients (44%) had weekly heartburn or regurgitation. Typical symptoms and dyspepsia were significantly more common in patients with GERD who had laryngeal symptoms than non‐GERD. Fifty‐two percent of patients had laryngeal symptoms that were associated with GERD. The presence of typical reflux symptoms and dyspepsia are risk factors for GERD in patients who present with laryngeal symptoms.     

Comparison of central and intraesophageal factors between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients and those with GERD‐related noncardiac chest pain

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes a wide range of symptoms. Some patients present with typical symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation and others with atypical symptoms such as chest pain. The mechanism responsible for the varying clinical presentation of GERD is still not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate differences in central and local intraesophageal factors between patients with typical GERD symptoms and those with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Patients presenting with typical and atypical symptoms suspicious of GERD underwent upper endoscopy and 24‐hour pH monitoring with four sensors, each positioned at a different esophageal level. All patients completed GERD symptom, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Symptom Stress Rating questionnaires. From January 2006 to December 2009, 50 patients were recruited, 29 with typical symptoms, and 21 with NCCP. Patients with proven GERD and NCCP had higher proximal extension of acid during reflux episodes than patients with typical symptoms. They were found to be older, had a shorter history of symptom onset, worse anxiety scores, and more endoscopic findings compatible with gastritis. Proximal extension of acid during the reflux episodes in patients with GERD presenting with NCCP may play a role in symptom generation.     

Visceral sensitivity in gastroesophageal reflux

Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by a wide spectrum of symptoms. The variance of GERD symptoms may be due to a decreased threshold for symptom elicitation/perception described as visceral sensitivity. In this study GERD symptoms were scored for presence/frequency. The symptom score was weighted for the presence/frequency of typical reflux symptoms: heartburn, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation. The weighted GERD symptom score was used to assess symptom expansion and the hypothesis of GERD visceral sensitivity. One hundred five subjects with heartburn/retrosternal pain underwent esophageal pH studies. Subjects with abnormal esophageal pH studies reported more GERD-related symptoms, occurring more frequently, compared to subjects with normal esophageal pH studies. Symptom scores correlated with the number of reflux episodes but not with the length of time of mucosal exposure to acid. Therefore, aggregation of symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux is associated with frequent alternation between low and normal pH values in the distal esophagus.     

酸和胆汁反流与胃食管反流症状的关系

目的 分析酸反流及胆汁反流在引起胃食管反流症状中的作用。方法 对56例有典型反流症状的患者进行24小时食管内pH值及BiHtee胆汁同步监测。患者通过症状按键标记典型反流症状，对每一症状事件按症状发生前2分钟内食管最低pH值和最高胆红素光吸收值，分别计算症状与酸反流或胆汁反流事件的相关性，得出每一例患者的酸反流相关症状指数(Sla)及胆汁反流相关症状指数(SIb)。结果 56例患者中共发生典型症状事件357次。其中大部分症状(37．25％)与酸反流有关，仅7．56％的症状与单纯胆汁反流有关。反流性食管炎组(RE)亚组的243次症状事件中，105次(43．21％)事件与酸反流相关，而21次(8．64％)与胆汁反流有关。两种症状相关指数均值比较差异有显著性。结论 胃食管反流症状事件与酸反流的相关性明显高于胆汁反流，胆汁反流在引起典型食管症状方面似乎不起主要作用。     

Symptoms with acid and nonacid reflux may be produced by different mechanisms

Twenty‐four‐hour multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII‐pH) esophageal monitoring detects both acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux episodes. The MII‐pH catheter contains six impedance segments placed 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, and 17 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A pH electrode at 5 cm above the LES identifies the type of reflux, i.e. acid or nonacid. Patients with acid and nonacid reflux exhibit typical and atypical symptoms often within 5 min following a reflux episode. The aim of this study is to compare the timing of symptoms after reflux episodes in patients with acid and nonacid reflux. Methods include a review of 70 MII‐pH tracings (42 females, mean age 40, range 18–85 years) either on (50 points) or off (20 points) acid suppression therapy. Typical (heartburn, regurgitation) and atypical (cough) symptoms with acid or nonacid reflux episodes detected by impedance were analyzed. Symptoms were considered positive with acid reflux if there was a pH drop to <4, plus an MII detected a reflux episode and with nonacid reflux if pH remained >4 and MII detected a reflux episode. The timing of the symptom after each reflux episode was recorded. Symptom perception occurred significantly sooner after acid versus nonacid reflux (P < 0.05). Acid reflux episodes are more likely to be perceived in the first 2 min following the reflux episode. Patients with acid reflux are likely to perceive symptoms earlier, and symptoms with acid and nonacid reflux may be produced by different mechanisms.     

Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and diseases associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM: Investigation of the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and diseases associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 299 subjects with GERD were submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and a symptom analysis. RESULTS: Chronic respiratory symptoms or diseases were present in 18% (56/299). Chronic cough was observed in 42/56 patients, while typical reflux symptoms such as heartburn and acid regurgitation were observed in 30/56 and 24/56 cases, respectively. The prevalence of airway diseases was chronic bronchitis 12/56, asthma 10/56, recurrent pneumonia 10/56, chronic sinusitis 7/56 and chronic laryngitis 1/56. In patients with respiratory complications pathologic acid reflux was established in 29/51 cases on the basis of the DeMeester score, while 17/51 had pathologic postprandial, nocturnal or diurnal reflux events. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a normal esophageal mucosa in 6/56, Savary-Miller stage I esophagitis in 23/56, stage II in 15/56, stage III in 5/56 and stage IV in 6/56 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These investigations have demonstrated an abnormal 24-hour pH score in about half of the patients with GERD-associated respiratory complications, and indicated that short reflux events are characteristic of the reflux activity in one third of this population.     

Females without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease have less distal esophageal acid exposure than males without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease

Ambulatory 24‐hour esophageal pH monitoring is the gold standard examination to assess esophageal acid exposure. Gender‐related variation is a well‐recognized physiologic phenomenon in health and disease. To date, limited gender‐specific 24‐hour esophageal pH monitoring data are available. The aim of this study was to obtain values of esophageal pH monitoring in males and females without reflux symptoms or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) to determine if gender variation exists in esophageal acid exposure among individuals without these factors. Twenty‐four‐hour dual esophageal pH monitoring was performed in male and female volunteers without reflux symptoms or GERD. Values for total number of reflux episodes, episodes longer than 5 minutes, total reflux time in minutes, % time with pH below 4, and longest reflux episode in the proximal/distal esophagus were obtained and recorded for both groups. The distal channel was placed 5 cm and proximal channel 15 cm above the manometrically determined lower esophageal sphincter. Means were compared using an independent sample t‐test. Sixty‐seven males and 69 females were enrolled. All subjects completed esophageal 24‐hour pH monitoring without difficulty. There was no age or body mass difference between groups. Females had significantly fewer reflux episodes at both esophageal measuring sites and, significantly less total reflux time and % time with pH below 4 in the distal esophagus than males. All other parameters were similar. Significant gender‐related differences exist in esophageal acid exposure, especially in the distal esophagus in individuals without reflux symptoms or GERD. These differences underscore the need for gender‐specific reference values for 24‐hour pH monitoring, allowing for an accurate evaluation of esophageal acid exposure in symptomatic patients.     

Complete elimination of reflux symptoms does not guarantee normalization of intraesophageal and intragastric pH in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

BACKGROUND: Acid plays a significant role in the development of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, such as heartburn and regurgitation. It is generally assumed that acid suppressive therapy improves or eliminates symptoms by normalizing intraesophageal pH. AIMS: The aim of this article was to assess the efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in normalizing intraesophageal and intragastric pH in patients with GERD without Barrett's esophagus (BE) rendered symptom free by therapy. METHODS: Patients were evaluated by dual-sensor 24-h pH monitoring while receiving PPI therapy for complete control of GERD symptoms. Analyses of intraesophageal and intragastric pH profiles were then made. RESULTS: Fifty patients, 39 men and 11 women, with GERD, without BE, were studied. All tolerated PPIs well and were asymptomatic at the time of the study. Fifty percent of patients had abnormal intraesophageal pH profiles despite adequate symptom control on PPIs, which was associated with significant breakthrough of intraesophageal acid control in both the upright and supine positions. Low intragastric pH correlated highly with intraesophageal acid reflux only in patients with persistent abnormal esophageal acid exposure (p= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of patients with GERD without BE continue to exhibit pathologic GERD and low intragastric pH despite PPI therapy that achieves complete reflux symptom control.     

以慢性咳嗽为主要表现的胃食管反流病患者的食管功能及反流特点

目的 通过对以慢性咳嗽为主要表现的胃食管反流病(GERD)患者行高分辨食管内压力-阻抗联合测定(MII-HRM)及24h联合多通道腔内阻抗-pH( MII-pH)监测的结果分析,探讨此类患者食管运动功能及胃食管反流的特点.方法 选取2010年3-11月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院就诊的19例GERD伴慢性咳嗽患者为研究对象.应用MII-HRM及24 h MII-pH监测系统测定上食管括约肌(UES)和下食管括约肌压力、食管体部蠕动功能、对液体和黏液性物质的传输功能、立位及卧位酸及非酸反流的次数、近端反流的次数、酸暴露时间、酸清除时间以及食团清除时间.以同期仅表现为典型胃食管反流症状的17例GERD患者作为对照,比较两组间食管运动功能以及胃食管反流参数的差异.结果 与仅表现为典型胃食管反流症状的GERD患者相比,以慢性咳嗽为主要表现的GERD患者的UES静息压力明显更低[(122.55 ±60.48)mm Hg比(86.37±41.35) mm Hg(1 mm Hg =0.133 kPa),P＜0.05],食管体部异常蠕动的比例更高[(9.47±15.63)％比(22.16±17.45)％,P＜0.05],食管体部对液体物质传输能力减低[(88.82±12.23)％比(71.68±23.06)％,P＜0.05],卧位时酸及非酸反流次数及卧位近端非酸反流次数明显增多(P＜0.05),卧位食团清除时间延长(P＜0.05).结论 以慢性咳嗽为主要表现的GERD发病机制可能与单纯典型GERD不同,其与UES静息压力减低、卧位酸及非酸反流、近端反流的增多以及食管清除功能障碍密切相关.     

Lower pH values of weakly acidic refluxes as determinants of heartburn perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with normal esophageal acid exposure

Multichannel impedance pH monitoring has shown that weakly acidic refluxes are able to generate heartburn. However, data on the role of different pH values, ranging between 4 and 7, in the generation of them are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether different pH values of weakly acidic refluxes play a differential role in provoking reflux symptoms in endoscopy‐negative patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure time and positive symptom index and symptom association probability for weakly acidic refluxes. One hundred and forty‐three consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonresponders to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), were allowed a washout from PPIs before undergoing: upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and multichannel impedance pH monitoring. In patients with both symptom index and symptom association probability positive for weakly acidic reflux, each weakly acidic reflux was evaluated considering exact pH value, extension, physical characteristics, and correlation with heartburn. Forty‐five patients with normal acid exposure time and positive symptom association probability for weakly acidic reflux were identified. The number of refluxes not heartburn related was higher than those heartburn related. In all distal and proximal liquid refluxes, as well as in distal mixed refluxes, the mean pH value of reflux events associated with heartburn was significantly lower than that not associated. This condition was not confirmed for proximal mixed refluxes. Overall, a low pH of weakly acidic reflux represents a determinant factor in provoking heartburn. This observation contributes to better understand the pathophysiology of symptoms generated by weakly acidic refluxes, paving the way toward the search for different therapeutic approaches to this peculiar condition of esophageal hypersensitivity.     

Stratification and symptom characteristics of non-erosive reflux disease based on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux

Background and Aim: The subgroups and symptom characteristics of non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) based on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux may be different in Chinese patients to Western patients. This study aimed to explore the stratification and symptom characteristics of patients with NERD. Methods: Patients with typical heartburn and/or acid regurgitation symptoms were enrolled. Each patient filled out a questionnaire. An upper gastrointestingal endoscopy was performed for each patient followed by simultaneous ambulatory 24‐h esophageal pH and Bilitec (bilirubin) monitoring. A symptom index (SI) of ≥50% was considered to be positive. Results: Eighty‐two consecutive NERD patients were evaluated. Abnormal (NERD pH+) and normal (NERD pH–) 24‐h pH tests were found in 24 (29.3%) and 58 (70.7%) patients, respectively. Among 42 NERD pH– patients who reported heartburn symptoms during monitoring, SI was positive in 19 (45.2%) patients (NE‐SI+) and negative in 23 (54.8%) patients (NE‐SI–). Pathological duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) was found in 43 (52.4%) patients. No significant differences were noted regarding the prevalence of other upper gastrointestinal symptoms, except for acid regurgitation in NERD pH+ and NERD pH– groups. Additionally, no significant differences were seen in the prevalence of other symptoms, except for chest pain, in groups with pathological and normal DGER. Conclusion: The proportion of NERD patients with pathological acid reflux was somewhat lower than that reported in Western countries. The role of DGER in NERD may be important. It is difficult to differentiate whether NERD patients have pathological acid or bile reflux according to symptoms.     

Laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been extensively studied in patients with laryngeal signs and symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux being identified in approximately 50%. Few studies have investigated the incidence and significance of LPR in GERD patients. Two-hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients referred with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux had dual probe 24 h pH, esophageal manometry, GERD and ENT questionnaires. LPR was defined as at least three pharyngeal reflux events less than pH 5.0 with corresponding esophageal reflux, but excluding meal periods. Fourty-two percent of patients were positive for LPR on 24 h pH monitoring and 91.3% corresponded with an abnormal esophageal acid score. Distal esophageal acid exposure was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in patients with LPR but symptoms of GERD and regurgitation scores showed no significant differences between patients with positive and negative LPR on 24 h pH. There was no significant difference between the incidence of LPR in patients with or without laryngeal symptoms. There is a high incidence of LPR in patients with GERD but its significance for laryngeal symptoms is tenuous. Fixed distance dual probe pH monitoring allows documentation of conventional esophageal reflux and LPR.     

Positive predictors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and the therapeutic response to proton-pump inhibitors

AIM:To identify objective and subjective predictors for the reliable diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)and the response to proton pump inhibitor(PPI)therapy.METHODS:Retrospectively,683 consecutive patients suspected for GERD who underwent pH-metry/impedance measurement(pH/MII)were analyzed.All patients had previously undergone standard PPI treatment(e.g.,pantoprazole 40 mg/d or comparable).Four hundred sixty patients were at least 10 d off PPIs(group A),whereas 223 patients were analyzed during their ongoing PPI therapy(group B).In addition,all patients completed a standardized symptom-and lifestyle-based questionnaire,including the therapeutic response to previous PPI trials on a 10-point scale.Uniand multivariance analyses were performed to identify criteria associated with positive therapeutic response to PPIs.RESULTS:In group A,positive predictors(PPs)for response in empirical PPI trials were typical GERD symptoms(heartburn and regurgitation),a positive symptom index(SI)and pathological results in pH/MII,along with atypical symptoms,including hoarseness and fullness.In group B,regular alcohol consumption was associated with the therapeutic response.The PPs for pathological results in pH/MII in group A included positive SI,male gender,obesity,heartburn and regurgitation.In group B,the PPs were positive SI and vomiting.Analyzing for positive SI,the PPs were pathological pH and/or MII,heartburn regurgitation,fullness,nausea and vomiting in group A and pathological pH and/or MII in group B.CONCLUSION:Anamnestic parameters(gender,obesity,alcohol)can predict PPI responses.In non-obese,female patients with non-typical reflux symptoms,pH/MII should be considered instead of empirical PPIs.     

When are reflux episodes symptomatic?

Careful scrutiny of pH recordings and symptom diaries in patients having 24-hour pH-metry reveals that most reflux episodes are asymptomatic. Although this observation is well known and long recognized, the explanation for why one reflux episode leads to symptoms and others do not is incompletely understood. Forty-four patients with chronic typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms referred for ambulatory pH testing were studied. Antisecretory medication was stopped 2 weeks prior to the study. Two meals were taken during the study; one standardized (hamburger, fries, milk-shake) and one at the patient's discretion. A system onset marker noted the type, beginning and end of symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain). Age, sex, upright/supine position, nadir pH, time pH < 4, and relationship to meals were compared for symptomatic/asymptomatic reflux episodes. An acid reflux event was defined as a drop in pH < 4 lasting > 5 seconds. The pH catheter detected 1464 reflux episodes. Only 93 (6.3%) were symptomatic. Forty-six of the 93 (49.4%) were associated with heartburn, 38 (40.9%) with regurgitation, and nine (9.7%) with chest pain. Nadir pH was significantly lower in symptomatic episodes. Nearly 50% of symptomatic reflux episodes occurred after meals, especially after non-standardized compared to standardized meal. Symptomatic episodes tended to be longer in duration and to occur in the supine position, while age/sex made no difference. Six percent of the reflux episodes were temporally associated with typical GERD symptoms. This association seems to be influenced by the acidity of the refluxate. Nearly half of the symptomatic reflux episodes occurred after eating.     

Symptom priority ranking in the care of gastroesophageal reflux: a review of 1,850 cases

BACKGROUND: Clinical history remains an important part of the medical evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia are considered typical symptoms of GERD. Priority rankings of these symptoms can be determined with a standardized questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether symptom priority ranking and symptom severity grading can provide useful information in the evaluation of patients with GERD. METHODS: From 1,850 patients that were analyzed retrospectively, patients with dysphagia unrelated to GERD were excluded. A standardized questionnaire was applied before each patient underwent any esophageal diagnostic study. Priority of symptoms was determined to be primary, secondary, tertiary, or none based on the patient response to the questionnaire. Presence of a stricture was determined either by endoscopy, esophagraphy, or both studies. Stationary esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring were performed on all patients. Through bivariate and multivariate analysis, the relationships among typical GERD symptoms, esophageal reflux-related stenosis, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and composite score were established. RESULTS: High priority ranking of the symptom dysphagia is predictive of the presence of an esophageal stricture, but has a negative association with abnormal manometric and pH studies. In contrast, high priority ranking of the symptom heartburn and regurgitation are positively associated with abnormal manometric and pH results. CONCLUSIONS: Priority ranking can be a valuable adjunct to objective testing in the evaluation of GERD. In certain clinical situations it can obviate the need for 24-hour pH monitoring.     

Comparison of esophageal acid exposure distribution along the esophagus among the different gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) groups

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) have the lowest esophageal acid exposure profile compared with the other gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) groups. AIM: To compare lower esophageal acid exposure recordings 1 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) with those 6 cm above the LES as well as to determine the characteristics of esophageal acid exposure along the esophagus among the different GERD groups. METHODS: Patients with classic heartburn symptoms were enrolled into the study. Patients were evaluated by a demographics questionnaire and the validated GERD Symptom Checklist. Upper endoscopy was performed to evaluate the presence of esophageal erosions and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Ambulatory pH testing was performed using a commercially available 4-sensor pH probe with sensors located 5 cm apart. The distal sensor was placed 1 cm above the LES. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients completed the study. Of those, 21 patients had NERD, 20 had erosive esophagitis (EE), and 23 had BE. All patient groups demonstrated greater esophageal acid exposure 1 cm above the LES than 6 cm above the LES. In NERD and EE, this phenomenon was primarily a result of a higher mean percentage of upright time with pH <4. Unlike patients with EE and BE, those with NERD had very little variation in esophageal acid exposure throughout the esophagus (total and supine). CONCLUSIONS: ALL GERD groups demonstrated significant greater esophageal acid exposure at the very distal portion of the esophagus, primarily as a result of short upright reflux events. Unlike erosive esophagitis and BE, NERD patients demonstrate a more homogenous acid distribution along the esophagus.     

Dual-Channel Ambulatory Esophageal pH Monitoring (A Useful Diagnostic Tool?)

Ambulatory pH monitoring of the distal esophagusis the most accurate diagnostic study for patients withsuspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Themeasurement of proximal esophageal acid exposure time may be useful in patients with atypicalreflux symptoms. The aim of this study is to evaluate ifproximal esophageal pH monitoring provides usefulinformation beyond that learned with distal esophageal pH monitoring. We routinely performeddual-channel pH monitoring with pH electrodes positionedat 20 and 5 cm above the manometric lower esophagealsphincter from January 1992 to August 1995. All patients scored their esophageal symptoms from zero(none) to four (severe). We compared proximal esophagealreflux (PR) in patients with typical symptoms (i.e.,heartburn, regurgitation) and in patients with atypical symptoms (i.e., chest pain, cough, hoarseness,and asthma). We compared symptom profiles betweenpatients with and without PR. We reviewed our experiencein patients with abnormal PR, but with a normal amount of distal esophageal reflux (DR). We studied441 consecutive patients. There were no significantdifferences in PR between patients with typical andatypical symptoms. There were no differences in symptom profiles between patients with normal andabnormal PR. There were no differences of PR between thedifferent atypical symptoms. PR did not correlate withthe severity of the patient's symptoms. PR correlated well only with DR. Twenty-four patients hadisolated abnormal PR, but only six patients improvedwith antireflux therapy. We conclude that routineambulatory esophageal pH monitoring of the proximalesophagus appears to be of little value. The decision tooffer patients an empiric trial of antireflux therapyfor suspected GERD should not be based on the presenceor absence of PR.     

Extra-esophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma: understanding this interplay

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that develops when there is reflux of stomach contents, which typically manifests as heartburn and regurgitation. These esophageal symptoms are well recognized; however, there are extra-esophageal manifestations of GERD, which include asthma, chronic cough, laryngitis and sinusitis. With the rising incidence of asthma, there is increasing interest in identifying how GERD impacts asthma development and therapy. Due to the poor sensitivity of endoscopy and pH monitoring, empiric therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is now considered the initial diagnostic step in patients suspected of having GERD-related symptoms. If unresponsive, diagnostic testing with pH monitoring off therapy and/or impedance/pH monitoring on therapy, may be reasonable in order to assess for baseline presence of reflux with the former and exclude continued acid or weakly acid reflux with the latter tests. PPI-unresponsive asthmatics, without overt regurgitation, usually have either no reflux or causes other than GERD. In this group, PPI therapy should be discontinued. In those with GERD as a contributing factor acid suppressive therapy should be continued as well as optimally treating other etiologies requiring concomitant treatment. Surgical fundoplication is rarely needed but in those with a large hiatal hernia, moderate-to-severe reflux by pH monitoring surgery might be helpful in eliminating the need for high-dose acid suppressive therapy.     

反流性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病患者酸暴露与食管压力监测结果分析

目的通过对胃食管反流病（GERD）患者的酸暴露情况、食管下括约肌（LES）压力、食管体部压力、幽门螺杆菌（Hp）感染结果的比较，探讨反流性食管炎（RE）、非糜烂性反流病（NERD）的不同状况，为临床治疗提供科学依据。方法2001年10月至2005年7月，具有反流症状（烧心、反酸）的患者80例，胃镜检出RE31例，NERD45例，Barrett食管（BE）4例。行食管24hpH动态监测，并以De—Meester积分均值将GERD分为轻、中、重度，检测LES、食管体部即LES上方5cm、7cm、13cm（简记为L5、L7、L12）和食管上括约肌（UES）下方1cm、6cm、8cm（简记为U1、U6、U8）压力指标，并进行Hp感染的检查。结果RE、NERD两组患者食管24hpH酸暴露各指标的差异，无统计学意义（P〉0．05），De-Meester积分均值亦无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；轻、中、重度GERD患者食管24hpH监测指标具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。RE、NERD两组患者LES压力、食管体部的L5、L7、L12、U6和u8压力监测指标无统计学意义（P〉0．05），只有RE组U1压力低于NERD组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）；轻、中、重度GERD患者LES压力和食管体部的压力监测指标差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。RE和NERD组患者Hp感染率分别为16．1％和22．2％，其差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05），OR为1．309，95％C10．364～4．705。结论RE和NERD患者酸暴露、LES压力和食管体部压力等相应指标无明显差异；NERD在发病机制中，酸反流的强弱没有起到决定性作用。     

Is impedance pH monitoring superior to the conventional 24‐h pH meter in the evaluation of patients with laryngorespiratory symptoms suspected to be due to gastroesophageal reflux disease?

OBJECTIVE: Cough and laryngo‐pharyngeal symptoms (LPS) are associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The role of acid reflux (AR) and non‐acid reflux (NAR) in atypical GERD pathogenesis is controversial. The aims of the study were to determine the prevalence of high esophageal acid exposure time (AET) in patients presenting with cough or LPS and determine the incremental yield of multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII‐pH) monitoring. METHODS: We undertook a prospective study of patients with cough or LPS referred for GERD evaluation between January 2009 and May 2011. All patients underwent esophageal manometry, gastroscopy and MII‐pH. Patients' characteristics, gastroscopy findings, distal esophageal AET, bolus exposure (BE) time and numbers of AR and NAR episodes in the proximal and distal esophagus were studied. RESULTS: Overall 50 patients (22 male, mean age 47.5 ± 14.2 years) were evaluated for unexplained chronic cough (n = 23, 46.0%), and LPS symptoms including globus (n = 10, 20.0%), sore throat (n = 12, 24.0%) and hoarse voice (n = 5, 10.0%). A normal gastroscopy, Los Angeles grade A and B esophagitis occurred in 44 (88.0%), 5 (10.0%) and 1 (2.0%) patient, respectively. Seven (14.0%) recorded elevated AET (chronic cough, 4; sore throat, 2; and hoarse voice, 1). Nine patients recorded abnormal impedance characteristics (raised BE time and/or increased reflux numbers) despite a normal AET leading to an incremental diagnostic yield of 18%. CONCLUSION: An isolated high AET is uncommon in patients with cough or LPS. Combined MII‐pH improves the diagnostic yield in patients with atypical GERD manifestations.