Evaluation of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer using a dual‐color chromogenic in situ hybridization (dual CISH)

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay is considered the ‘gold standard’ for evaluation of HER2/neu (HER2) gene status, however, it is difficult to recognize morphologic features of tumors using fluorescence microscopy. Thus, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) has been proposed as an alternative method to evaluate HER2 gene amplification. Here, we examined the dual color CISH (dual CISH) method which provides information regarding the copy number of the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 centromere from a single slide. We examined 40 cases of invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast that were resected surgically. HER2 gene status was assessed with FISH (Abbott) and dual CISH (Dako). HER2 gene amplification status was classified according to the guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP). Comparison of the cut‐off values for HER2/chromosome 17 centromere copy number ratio obtained by dual CISH and FISH showed that there was almost perfect agreement between two methods (Kappa coefficient 0.96). The results of the two commercial products were almost consistent for evaluation of HER2 gene counts on the sections. The current study proved that dual CISH is comparable with FISH for evaluating HER2 gene status.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridisation testing for HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer produces highly reproducible results concordant with fluorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, ease of use and reproducibility of chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) for HER2 testing by studying its inter-laboratory concordance in five Australian pathology laboratories. METHODS: The HER2 status of 49 breast cancers was determined by CISH twice in two different laboratories. Each sample had previously been tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC; 2+ and 3+ cases selected) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Participating laboratories were blinded to these test results. Oestrogen receptor (ER) status was also evaluated for each cancer. RESULTS: High correlation was observed between FISH and CISH results. No cases showing high gene amplification by FISH were scored as non-amplified by CISH (kappa coefficient = 1). High correlation was observed between IHC and CISH, all IHC 3+ samples showing amplification by CISH. Inter-laboratory CISH concordance was also good (kappa coefficient = 0.67). Fifty-six per cent of HER2-amplified samples tested ER positive, while 42% of ER-positive cases showed HER2 gene amplification, confirming that HER2 testing should not be confined to ER-negative breast cancers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that CISH is a robust test to assess HER2 status in breast cancer and therefore is an important addition to the HER2 testing algorithm.     

Dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization for testing of HER-2 oncogene amplification in archival breast tumours

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), which uses an enzymatic reaction to detect the hybridized DNA probe, is a new alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the assessment of HER-2 oncogene amplification status in breast cancer. The main advantage of CISH over FISH is the use of bright-field microscopy, which is rapid and allows the histopathological evaluation of tumour tissue sections. The main disadvantage of CISH has been the use of a single probe, thereby making it necessary to hybridize the control probe (chromosome 17 centromere) on an adjacent tissue section. The present paper presents an efficient protocol for dual-colour CISH (dc-CISH) based on the co-hybridization of probes to the HER-2 oncogene and chromosome 17 centromere. The probes were detected sequentially with antibodies to digoxigenin and biotin and with secondary antibody polymers labelled with horseradish peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase. The peroxidase reaction was visualized with tetramethyl benzidine (green reaction product) and the alkaline phosphatase reaction with New Fuchsin (red reaction product). The accuracy of the method was verified by comparing the results for four cell lines and 40 tumour samples with those obtained using FISH (Vysis Inc.). The results of FISH and dc-CISH showed high concordance (91%, Kappa coefficient = 0.82). It is concluded that dual-colour CISH, which is a new alternative to FISH enables the assessment of copy number ratio (HER-2/17 centromere) in conjunction with proper histopathological evaluation and the ease of bright-field microscopy.     

Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens

García‐Caballero T, Grabau D, Green A R, Gregory J, Schad A, Kohlwes E, Ellis I O, Watts S & Mollerup J
(2010) Histopathology 56, 472–480
Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens Aims: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to reveal several genomic imbalances relevant to proper cancer diagnosis and to the correct treatment regime. However, FISH requires expensive and advanced fluorescence microscopes in addition to expertise in fluorescence microscopy. To determine whether a newly developed dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) method is a suitable alternative to FISH, we analysed the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) amplification level of 168 breast cancer specimens using dual‐colour CISH and FISH and compared the results. Methods and results: We found 100% agreement between HER2 status determined by FISH and dual‐colour CISH. Furthermore, we observed that the time used to score slides was significantly reduced by 28% in dual‐colour CISH compared with the FISH protocol. Concordance between HER2 protein status and dual‐colour CISH or FISH was equally good with an overall agreement of 96.8%. Correlation between the HER2/centromere 17 gene ratios obtained with dual‐colour CISH and FISH was highly significant with an overall correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.96. Conclusions: We conclude that dual‐colour CISH and bright field microscopy are excellent alternatives to FISH when analysing the HER2 status of primary breast cancer.     

Prognostic value of HER2 gene amplification detected by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in metastatic breast cancer

After so many years of research, clinical value of HER2 (Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is unclear. Perhaps the main reason is variability of testing methods that produce controversial results. There is a lack of studies regarding prognostic value of CISH especially in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) when risk evaluation is based on different parameters than for primary breast cancer. Aim of this study was to compare prognostic relevance of HER2 status in MBC tested by two different methods i.e. immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH).HER2 status of the same group of 107 MBC patients was determined by IHC (protein overexpression) and by CISH (gene amplification). HER2 results obtained by IHC and CISH showed significant correlation, beside the existence of discrepancies. Beside the significant correlation in two methods, there was a difference in prognostic values of compared methods during the course of metastatic disease. There was a significant difference in progression-free interval (PFI) between HER2 non-amplified and HER2 amplified cases determined by CISH, in postmenopausal subgroup and node-positive subgroup, but no significant difference for IHC stratified MBC patients. CISH seems to be accurate and more informative method than IHC regarding prognostic value of HER2 in metastatic breast cancer.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of HER-2/neu status in breast carcinoma: application in screening of patients for trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy

Evaluation of HER-2/neu status is important in the management of patients with breast carcinoma, especially in determining the possible application of trastuzumab, a humanized anti-HER-2/neu monoclonal antibody. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) detection of the HER-2/neu oncogene is a newly developed in situ hybridization method that utilizes a robust and unique-sequence DNA probe labeled with digoxygenin, and sequential incubations with antidigoxygenin fluorescein, antifluorescein peroxidase, and diaminobenzidine. In this study, we examined 20 archival specimens of human breast carcinoma using CISH, and we correlated findings with immunohistochemical findings for HER-2/neu. HER-2/neu immunohistochemistry was carried out with HercepTest, a standardized immunohistochemical examination system for HER-2/neu overexpression in surgical pathology specimens. CISH analysis could be done in 18 out of 20 cases examined. Gene copy signals for HER-2/neu were recognized as intranuclear brown dots in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells. Seven carcinomas showed an increased number or size of signals and were interpreted as being positive for HER-2/neu amplification. Eight cases were positive with the HercepTest. Seven out of eight carcinoma cases found to overexpress immunoreactive HER-2/neu also demonstrated HER-2/neu gene amplification following CISH analysis. There was a significant correlation between immunohistochemical and CISH analyses (P < 0.001). We found that CISH was a specific, sensitive and easily applicable method for the detection of HER-2/neu gene amplification, which may be used together with immunohistochemical examination for the evaluation of patients with breast carcinoma.     

乳腺癌组织HER2基因扩增的检测方法

目的:评价高分辨率熔体聚合酶链反应(high-resolution melt polymerase chain reaction,HRM-PCR)检测HER2基因扩增的有效性及其与荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)和免疫组织化学(immunohistochemistry,IHC)检测法的一致性.方法:采用HRM-PCR法检测HER2阴性及阳性细胞株,评估检测方法的有效性;检测98例已行FISH和/或IHC的临床样本,并与FISH和IHC结果进行比较.结果:HRM-PCR检测可以有效区分HER2阴性及阳性细胞株(P<0.05),具有较好的可重复性;检测98例临床样本显示,阴性和阳性样本检测结果差异有统计学意义(0.18±0.14 vs 1.42±0.88,P<0.01),与IHC的一致性为80.33%(kappa=0.6,P<0.01),与FISH的一致性为87.88%(kappa=0.7,P<0.01),结论:HRM-PCR是一种可靠有效的检测HER2基因扩增的方法,与FISH和IHC均有较好的一致性.     

Comparison of Dako fluorescence in situ hybridization assays (FISH and IQFISH) in the assessment of HER2 amplification in breast cancer

Abstract

Determining human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer patients can be attained by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis, which prompts targeted treatment options. This study was performed to compare the staining results of Dako’s manual overnight HER2 FISH pharmDx^? assay with the manual (4 hours) HER2 IQFISH pharmDx^? assay and the Dako Omnis automated (4 hours) HER2 IQFISH assay, for assessment of HER2 amplification.

Thirty-four formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks from patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer were used to compare three FISH assays in three experiments. All assays included Texas Red-labeled HER2 and fluorescein-labeled centromere 17 (CEN-17) probes. First, 20 blocks with known HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH results from a reference laboratory were used in the validation of HER2 FISH pharmDx^? assay. Secondly, 19 of the same blocks were used in a comparison of HER2 FISH pharmDx^? assay and HER2 Instant Quality FISH pharmDx (IQFISH pharmDx^?) assays. The third experiment, which included 23 blocks, compared the HER2 FISH pharmDx^? assay with the Dako Omnis IQFISH assay (stained on a Beta version of Dako’s new Omnis platform). Stained slides were counted following American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines (2007 version), with three categories of labeling: <1·8 (negative), 1·8–2·2 (equivocal), and >2·2 (positive) calculated HER2/CEN-17 ratio. The results showed high agreement between all assays employed. Initial validation of HER2 FISH pharmDx^? assay to the results provided by a reference laboratory had a concordance of 95%. The concordance between HER2 FISH pharmDx^? assay and HER2 IQFISH pharmDx^? assay was 100%. There was also 100% concordance between manual and Omnis IQFISH staining. A high level of concordance was obtained in all three experiments, indicating that manual and automated IQFISH are comparable to HER2 FISH pharmDx^?. IQFISH has a faster turn-around-time (TAT) and showed comparable results in quality and quantitation.     

Dual-colour chromogenic in-situ hybridization is a potential alternative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in HER2 testing

Hwang C‐C, Pintye M, Chang L‐C, Chen H‐Y, Yeh K‐Y, Chein H‐P, Lee N & Chen J‐R
(2011) Histopathology 59 , 984–992 Dual‐colour chromogenic in‐situ hybridization is a potential alternative to fluorescence in‐situ hybridization in HER2 testing Aim: Dual‐colour chromogenic in‐situ hybridization (dc‐CISH) is an emerging methodology for characterizing genomic alterations. This study was aimed at evaluating the performance of a dc‐CISH kit (ZytoVision) in determining human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer. Methods and results: Two hundred and twenty‐eight invasive breast carcinomas arranged in tissue microarrays were analysed in parallel with dc‐CISH, fluorescence in‐situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry. Of 227 tumours with available FISH and dc‐CISH results, HER2 amplification and non‐amplification were detected in 49 (21.6%) and 178 (78.4%) tumours, respectively, by both assays. The concordance between dc‐CISH and FISH results showed 100% agreement (κ‐coefficient = 1.00). Immunohistochemically, 162 (71%), 25 (11.0%) and 41 (18%) tumours were scored 0/1+, 2+, and 3+, respectively. The corresponding results with both FISH and dc‐CISH demonstrated HER2 amplification in two (3.2%), nine (36%) and 38 (93%) tumours, respectively. Complete consensus among these three methods was observed in 197 cases, representing 98% of all 3+ and 0/1+ tumours (κ‐coefficient = 0.92). Confirmatory testing of 25 2+ tumours showed complete consensus between FISH and dc‐CISH. Conclusions: dc‐CISH is a promising alternative to FISH in HER2 testing, and the single‐institute incidence of HER2 amplification in breast cancer in Taiwan is 21.2%.     

Simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in paraffin-embedded breast cancer

The determination of HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas has become essential for the selection of breast cancer patients for Herceptin therapy. Herceptin treatment is used in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma with HER2/neu protein overexpression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A multiparametric fluorescent approach based on the simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein expression was established to increase the accuracy, and to improve the reproducibility, of HER2/neu diagnostics. Based on four paraffin-embedded breast cancer cell lines, a combined fluorescent immunostaining (FIHC) and FISH method was developed by using the PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe Kit (VYSIS) and the polyclonal antibody from the HercepTest (DAKO). Diagnostic applicability was documented on 215 formalin-fixed primary breast carcinomas. Criteria for immunofluorescence quantification were chosen by analogy with the FDA-approved HercepTest scoring, ranging from 0 to 3+. There was 97.7% concordance between conventional IHC and fluorescence IHC. The FISH data resulting from the multiparametric approach did not differ from conventional FISH. Breast carcinomas with HER2/neu protein overexpression and simultaneous gene amplification were detected with 100% sensitivity. In addition, five of the 215 cases (2.3%) had HER2/neu gene amplification without protein overexpression. The main advantage of this novel approach is that polysomy, aneuploidy, gene amplification, and protein content can be analysed simultaneously in the same cell.     

Correlation between immunohistochemistry (HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 in 426 breast carcinomas from 37 centres

Accurate diagnostic assessment of HER-2 is essential for the appropriate application of the humanized anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin) to the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The diagnostic test needs to be applicable to archival, fixed tissue removed at excision, in many cases several years earlier. We compared the assessment of HER-2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC; HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 426 breast carcinomas from patients being considered for trastuzumab therapy. The tumours were tested in three reference centres having been sent in from 37 hospitals. Only 2/270 (0.7%) IHC 0/1+ tumours were FISH positive. Six of 102 (5.9%) IHC 3+ tumours were FISH negative. Five of the six had between 1.75 and 2.0 HER-2 gene copies per chromosome 17 and the sixth had multiple copies of chromosome 17. Thirteen per cent of tumours were IHC 2+ and overall 48% of these were FISH positive but this proportion varied markedly between the centres. Sixty IHC-stained slides selected to be enriched with 2+ cases were circulated between the three laboratories and scored. There were 20 cases in which there was some discordance in scoring. Consideration of the FISH score in these cases led to concordance in the designation of positivity/negativity in 19 of these 20 cases. These data support an algorithm in which FISH testing is restricted to IHC 2+ tumours in reference centres. The results may not extrapolate to laboratories with less experience or using different methodologies.     

Comparison between immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization in assessing HER-2 status in breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) is usually determined as a potential target for breast cancer therapy. The purpose of the present study was to compare chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in determination of HER-2 status, in metastatic breast cancer patients screened for the clinical study of chemotherapy +/- herceptin. It was possible to assess both CISH and IHC in 56 cases, using CISH Detection Kit (Zymed) and HercepTest (DakoCytomation), respectively. HER-2 was amplified by CISH in 32 cases (57%) while 33 (59%) were HER-2-positive by IHC. A concordance between HER-2 status determined by CISH and IHC was noted in 43 of 56 cases (77%; P = 0.00008). Gene amplification was observed in 6/16 cases (37.5%) in IHC-negative subgroup (1+), while no amplification was observed in 5/10 cases (50%) in the IHC-positive subgroup (2+). These results suggest that there was a greater heterogeneity on the genetic level and that simple IHC classification was not sufficient. It is suggested that CISH could be considered as a useful additional method to IHC in determining HER-2 status in breast cancer patients, with a recommendation for testing not only the 2+ but also the 1+ subgroup of patients.     

Impact of polysomy 17 on HER2 testing of invasive breast cancer patients

Background: Current American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines define HER2-positive tumors as those with > 6 HER2 genes per nucleus or those with HER2/CEP17 (chromosome 17) ratio > 2.2. These guidelines are potentially contradictory in tumors with polysomy of chromosome 17. The current study was performed to determine the impact of polysomy 17 on the interpretation of HER2 testing of invasive breast carcinomas. Methods: Chromosome 17 copies and HER2 gene status were identified by fluorescent in situ hybridization in 384 cases with invasive breast cancer, and the corresponding HER2 expression was obtained by immunohistochemistry stain. Results: The average CEP17 copy number for the group was 2.1 (range, 1.0-12.4). Forty-eight cases (13.8%, 48/348) were identified as chromosome 17 polysomy with CEP 17 copy number ≥ 3. Ninety-two (26.4%) cases had > 6 copies of HER2 per nucleus, and 92 cases (26.4%) qualified as HER2 gene amplified using the HER2/CEP17 ratio (> 2.2) guideline. Polysomy 17 showed poorly positive correlations with both HER2 gene copy number and HER2 overexpression (P < 0.01, r = 0.338 and 0.271, respectively). The distribution of clinicopathologic parameters of Polysomy 17 tumors was more similar to HER2 negative than HER2 positive tumors. Conclusions: Polysomy 17 is a crucial cause of equivocal HER2 testing results by FISH, depending on which criterion (ratio vs. absolute number) is used for interpretation. Polysomy 17 cannot be an independent predictive factor for HER2 gene amplification or protein overexpression.     

乳腺癌Her2基因荧光原位杂交及其临床病理关系

目的探讨Her2基因过表达的比例及其与临床病理之间的联系。方法收集乳腺浸润型导管癌标本50例,总结其临床及病理资料,应用石蜡包埋组织切片,以EnVision两步法进行免疫组织化学染色标记ER、PR及HER2,以金菩嘉DNA探针试剂盒行荧光原位杂交检测HER2基因。结果患者平均年龄55.5岁,病理组织分级Ⅰ级11例,Ⅱ级30例,Ⅲ级9例。术后分期Ⅰ期13例,ⅡA期15例,ⅡB期13例,ⅢA期6例,ⅢB期2例,ⅢC期1例。淋巴结中位转移率6.91%。ER阳性33例,PR阳性32例,IHC法HER2阳性40例,FISH阳性33例,阴性17例。FISH法检测HER2基因与HER2蛋白过表达之间相关(P0.05),其与病理分级、术后分期、淋巴结转移率及ER、PR的表达无相关(P0.05),3例脉管内瘤栓及3例原发瘤数大于1者,FISH均为阳性。结论FISH检测HER2基因扩增和免疫组化检测HER2蛋白一致性较好,HER2基因与脉管内瘤栓及多个原发瘤有一定关系,但其作为间接预测预后的指标有待于进一步研究。     

Determination of the HER2 amplification status by in situ fluorescent hybridization and concordance with immunohistochemistry for breast cancer samples in Colombia

Objectives:

To determine the status of the HER2 amplification in Breast cancer performed in peripheral laboratories in Colombia by immunohistochemistry and its comparison with central laboratories and the FISH status.

Methods:

Four thousand one hundred and five cases referred for the determination of the HER2 status by FISH and/or IHQ to the Department of Pathology of the Fundacion Santa Fe were studied. The analysis included correlation between the IHQ HER2 score submitted by the peripheral laboratory (PL), the HER2 score emitted in the CL and the FISH studies performed in the central laboratory (CL).

Results:

Two thousand five hundred and eight HER2 IHQ studies were performed in the (CL), using the Dako Herceptest. With the following results: 68.2 % negative (0-1+); 16,4% indeterminate (2+); 15.3% 3+ and 2.3 % not adequate. 1360/ 1719 cases studied by FISH came from the (PL), and 329 (19.1%) from the (CL). Comparing the IHQ score emitted by the PL and the positive FISH status showed: 6/28 0+ were positive (21. 4%); 7/31 1+ (22. 5%); 397/1240 2+ (32.8%) and 74/91 3+ (81. 3%). In the CL the results were 1/9 0+ (11.1%); 3/18 1+ (16.7%); 154/292 2+ (53%); and 9/9 3+ (100%). Only 1/4 negative cases (0/1+) was in house.

Conclusion:

The false negative rate (22%), and false positive results (18.7%), of the HER2 status performed by IHQ in peripheral laboratories in Colombia is unacceptable high as well as the inadequacy of tissue indicating that pre-analytical factors have to be improved in Colombia in order to get optimal results.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her‐2/neu‐oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Aims: Her‐2/neu testing is used as a marker for Herceptin^® therapy. The aim was to investigate new dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in a large number of breast carcinomas (n = 205) with DNA‐specific dual‐colour probes (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany) and to compare the results with immunohistochemistry (n = 205) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 129). Methods and results: Paraffin‐embedded tissue of 205 patients was used. After immunohistochemistry with a focus on immunohistochemically uncertain cases, Her‐2/neu amplification using dual‐colour CISH (ZytoVision^®) was analysed. Validation by FISH was performed. The results were: immunohistochemistry, 27.8% with strong expression, 53.7% with uncertain overexpression and 18.5% with no expression; FISH, 25.6% amplified and 74.4% negative; CISH, 35.6% amplified, 62.9% negative and 1.5% not evaluable. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with CISH: CISH negative in 100% with immunohistochemistry 0/1+, amplified in 82.5% with immunohistochemistry 3+; 5.9% contradictory results: 4.4% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by CISH, 1.5% negative in immunohistochemistry but amplified by CISH; FISH (129 cases), 8.5% contradictory results to immunohistochemistry, 6.2% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by FISH, 2.3% negative by immunohistochemistry and amplified by FISH; comparison of CISH and FISH, 94.6% same results, 3.9% different ones, 1.6% CISH not analysable. Conclusions: CISH, using dual‐colour probes (ZytoVision^®) is as good as FISH for Her‐2/neu analysis. The few discrepant results are likely to be caused by polysomy or tumour heterogeneity.     

Evaluation of analytical accuracy of HER2 status in patients with breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene status and overexpression, occurring in ~ 13.6% of primary breast cancers, is essential for identifying patients likely to benefit from biological treatment. In this method of evaluation study, we tested and compared the HER2 gene–protein assay (GPA) with routine HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The GPA was evaluated using 67 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) HER2 equivoval IHC (2+) breast cancer tissue samples. Overall, agreement between GPA silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and FISH was 91.9% (57/62). Regression analysis revealed slightly higher, but non-significant difference in HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio for GPA as compared to FISH (p = 0.074). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.94 and Spearman´s rank correlation coefficients of 0.93 (p < 0.0001) for FISH and GPA SISH suggested strong inter-observer association for methods with one observer counting on average 0.23 significant higher for GPA SISH (p = 0.014). Intra-observer IHC method reproducibility was 52.6% (κ = 0.3122, p = 0.004) and 79.7% (κ = 0.6428, p = 0.9197), suggesting fair significant and substantial non-significant difference between tests for reviewers. Inter-observer reproducibility for IHC methods was 53%. While inter-observer reproducibility for experienced IHC interpretation suggested significant differences (κ = 0.3636, p = 0.0332), unexperienced interpretation of IHC GPA suggested fair non-significant difference between reviewers (κ = 0.3101, p = 0.0747). Using FISH as reference, the diagnostic indices for GPA SISH were as follows: sensitivity 100%, specificity 95% and accuracy 92%. Inaccuracy between tests was in 80% of cases due to ISH categorization as equivocal by one of the methods. IHC results highlight that it may be beneficial with a method for simultaneously visualization of HER2 gene and protein status.     

Detection of c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) amplification in breast carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue sections and imprinted cells

Abnormalities in c-erbB-2 have attracted a great deal of attention. Treatment using an antibody against the c-erbB-2 gene product is effective against breast cancers with amplification and/or overexpression of c-erbB-2. There is an urgent need to establish methodology for selecting patients who would benefit from this therapy. A total of 235 breast carcinomas were examined for c-erbB-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections with discernible immunostaining from 52 tumors, 70 negative tumors and smear imprints from 35 patients were examined by dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for c-erbB-2 and the centromeric region of chromosome 17. The concordance between gene amplification and protein overexpression was 95.7%. When the findings of the two FISH preparation techniques were compared, no discrepancies were found in 24 of the tumors. However, differences were seen in eight cases. In six of these cases the differences did not affect the presence or absence of amplification, but in the other two cases, considered to show low-level amplification on paraffin sections, polysomy 17 was detected instead. It was concluded that FISH is an excellent tool to detect gene amplification in particular, and FISH on touch imprints is a useful adjunct to differentiate between low-level amplification and polysomy 17.     

Comparison of dual-color dual-hapten brightfield in situ hybridization (DDISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer HER2 assessment

The most optimal method for assessing HER2 status is still subject to controversy as far as the type of assay used, the optimal method to perform, and the costs of each assay are concerned. The current study was done as a validation study prior to setting up a clinical HER2 testing service using the new commercial dual-color dual-hapten brightfield in situ hybridization (DDISH), but it was felt that our experience may be of interest to other laboratories considering setting up HER2 diagnostic facilities.     

Expression and amplification of Her2, EGFR and cyclin D1 in breast cancer: immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization

Determination of Her2, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cyclin D1 status is now of major clinical importance due to the development of molecule-targeting drugs in anticancer therapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) are the most simple and convenient methods for evaluating gene alterations and their protein consequences. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the status of Her2, EGFR and cyclin D1 on both IHC and CISH in 95 primary breast carcinomas. There was substantial consistency between the IHC and CISH results of Her2 and EGFR, showing fair agreement between protein overexpression and gene amplification. However, cyclin D amplification was not related to protein overexpression. Moreover, there was no correlation between Her2, EGFR and cyclin D1. Her2 protein overexpression and amplification were positively associated with histological grade, nuclear grade and inversely correlated with the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). In ER-negative and postmenopausal patients, EGFR gene amplification was strongly associated with worse recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0087, P = 0.0149, respectively). Overall, the present findings suggest that EGFR gene amplification is important in predicting prognosis and this should be evaluated in breast carcinoma in addition to Her2 status in routine pathological practice.