3D-SPACE序列在肩关节MR造影中评估上盂唇前后撕裂

目的：评价肩关节 MR造影三维各向同性脂肪抑制快速自旋回波（SPACE）序列对上盂唇前后撕裂（SLAP损伤）的诊断价值。方法：影像诊断医师回顾性分析经关节镜证实的肩关节 MR 造影图像,判定有无SLAP 损伤及分型,对比常规二维序列和SPACE序列对SLAP损伤的敏感度、特异度及准确率,比较常规二维序列与SPACE 序列的诊断价值。结果：肩关节镜证实SLAP损伤12例,肩关节 MR造影SPACE序列与常规二维序列对SLAP 损伤的敏感度分别为83．33％（10/12）及91．67％（11/12）,特异度分别为81．25％（13/16）及87．50％（14/16）,准确度分别为82．14％（23/28）及89．29％（25/28）。SPACE序列与常规二维序列对 SLAP 损伤的诊断效能无明显统计学差异（P＞0．05）。结论：肩关节MR造影中SPACE序列是评价SLAP损伤准确、可靠的影像学方法。     

Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder

Objective  To compare the diagnostic value of indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (I-MRA) with that of direct MR arthrography (D-MRA) for labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tears using a 3-T MR unit. Materials and methods  Institutional review board approval was given; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2005 to June 2006, 19 patients (eight men and 11 women; mean age, 51 years) who had undergone both I-MRA and D-MRA underwent arthroscopic surgery. Both methods were performed in fat-saturated axial, coronal oblique, and sagittal oblique T1-weighted sequences, as well as axial and coronal oblique T2-weighted sequences. Two radiologists independently and retrospectively evaluated two sets of MRA for the diagnosis of superior and anterior labral tears, subscapularis tendon (SSC), and supraspinatus–infraspinatus tendon (SSP–ISP) tears, and LHBT tears. With the arthroscopic finding as a gold standard, we analyzed statistical differences of sensitivities and specificities between two sets of MRA and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the kappa value. Results  The sensitivity and specificity of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 1 were 79/80% and 71/80%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/100% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/75% and 64/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 100/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP–ISP tears; and 67/100% and 78/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. Those of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 2 were 86/80% and 71/100%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/83% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/88% and 82/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 92/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP–ISP tears; and 78/90% and 89/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. No significant differences were found between the methods. Inter-observer agreements were higher than moderate (κ > 0.41) with both methods. Conclusions  Based on a relatively small number of patients, no significant difference was detected between I-MRI and D-MRI with regard rotator cuff, labral, and LHBT tears.     

肩袖撕裂的肩关节MR造影评价

目的 评价肩关节MR造影对肩袖撕裂的诊断价值。方法 分析32例病人的肩关节MR造影图像,评价内容包括肩袖肌腱、盂唇、肱二头肌长头腱,结果与肩关节镜及肩部开放手术比较。结果 以肩关节镜和手术结果为标准,32例病人包括14例全层撕裂,6例下表面部分撕裂,12例无撕裂。肩关节MR造影判定有无肩袖撕裂的敏感性、特异性和准确性都为100％;诊断全层撕裂的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100％、94％和97％。同时,肩关节MR造影还正确诊断了所有的多肌腱撕裂、合并的盂唇异常及肱二头肌长头腱异常。结论 肩关节MR造影可以准确、全面地评价肩袖撕裂。     

肩关节MR造影对肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断价值

目的明确肩关节造影MR对肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断价值，并比较中立位肩关节造影MR和外展外旋（abduction and external rotation, ABER）造影MR的价值。方法回顾性分析经证实的44例肩关节造影MR资料，以肩关节镜检查结果为金标准，对比中立位肩关节造影MR和ABER造影MR对肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断价值。结果中立位肩关节造影MR对前方盂唇的诊断敏感度为79．3％（23／29），特异度为100％（15／15），准确度为86．4％（38／44）；ABER造影MR的敏感度为93．1％（27／29），特异度为100％（15／15），准确度为95．5％（42／44）。ABER造影MR显著提高了前方盂唇病变的诊断敏感度（P=0．037）。结论ABER造影MR可以提高肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断敏感度。     

常规MRI与MR关节造影诊断肩袖撕裂的初步对比研究

目的 比较3.0T常规MRI和MR关节造影检查对肩袖撕裂的诊断价值.方法 分析48例肩关节病变患者的常规MRI和MR关节造影检查资料,确定肩袖有无撕裂并进行分型.其中4例行肩关节镜检查.采用配对x2检验比较两种检查方法诊断肩袖撕裂的差异性.结果 常规MRI显示冈上肌腱全层撕裂6例,冈上肌腱部分撕裂9例;MR关节造影显示冈上肌腱全层撕裂7例,冈上肌腱部分撕裂8例.常规MRI和MR关节造影检查方法对肩袖全层撕裂诊断有6例相同,1例常规MRI诊断无撕裂MR关节造影诊断为撕裂;对肩袖部分撕裂的诊断有7例相同,3例不同,其中2例常规MRI诊断为撕裂而MR关节造影诊断为无撕裂,1例常规MRI诊断为无撕裂而MR关节造影诊断为撕裂;两种检查方法对肩袖全层撕裂(x2=0.000,P＞0.05)及部分撕裂(x2=o.000,P＞0.05)的诊断差异无统计学意义.结论 初步显示3.0T常规MRI对肩袖全层撕裂和肩袖部分撕裂的诊断能达到MR关节造影的诊断效果,同时可以显示肩袖撕裂伴发的各种异常.     

上方盂唇前后向撕裂的肩关节MR造影评价

目的 评价肩关节MR造影对上方盂唇前后向撕裂(SLAP损伤)的诊断价值.方法 由2名影像诊断医师独立回顾分析137例经肩关节镜证实的肩关节造影MR图像,判定有无SLAP损伤,并进行分型.SLAP损伤分4型:Ⅰ型为上盂唇毛糙,Ⅱ型为肱二头肌腱盂唇复合体从关节孟撕裂,Ⅲ型为上盂唇桶柄状撕裂,Ⅳ型为上盂唇桶柄状撕裂并同时累及肱二头肌长头腱.计算肩关节MR造影对SLAP损伤的敏感度、特异度和准确度,以及与肩关节镜分型的符合率.采用Kappa统计计算2名影像诊断医师评价的一致性.结果 137例患者中,肩关节镜证实SLAP损伤59例,包括SLAP损伤Ⅰ型6例(10.2%)、Ⅱ型50例(84.7%)、Ⅲ型3例(5.1%).肩关节MR造影的敏感度、特异度和准确度医师甲分别为86.4%(51/59)、78.2%(61/78)和81.8%(112/137),医师乙分别为88.1%(52/59)、84.6%(66/78)和86.1%(118/137).2名影像诊断医师的评价一致性极好(K=0.796).肩关节MR造影与肩关节镜的分型符合率医师甲为83.1%(49/59),医师乙为79.7%(47/59).结论 肩关节MR造影是评价SLAP损伤比较可靠的影像方法.     

肩袖损伤的MRI诊断比较研究

目的:比较常规MRI和MRI间接关节造影检查对肩袖撕裂伤的诊断价值.方法:搜集2002年11月～2006年8月共40例肩袖损伤病例,20例行常规MRI检查,20例行MRI间接关节造影检查.以肩关节镜作为诊断标准,比较两种影像学方法诊断肩袖损伤的敏感性和特异性.结果:肩袖完全撕裂中,常规MRI检查的敏感度为45.5%,特异度为66.7%,准确度为55%;MRI间接关节造影的敏感度为92.3%,特异度为85.7%,准确度为90%.肩袖不全撕裂中,常规MRI检查敏感度为57.1%,特异度为53.8%,准确度为55%;而间接关节造影敏感度为83.3%,特异度为92.8%,准确度则为90%.经Fisher确切概率统计法统计,MRI间接关节造影诊断肩袖全层撕裂敏感性及准确性明显高于常规MRI(P＜0.05),在诊断肩袖部分撕裂时,MRI间接关节造影的特异性及准确性明显高于MRI(P＜0.05).结论:MRI间接关节造影较常规MRI诊断肩袖撕裂准确性较高.同时对盂唇等其它病变诊断有帮助.     

Depiction of the triangular fibro-cartilage in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain: comparison of direct multi-slice CT arthrography and direct MR arthrography

To compare direct multi-slice CT arthrography (MSCT-AG) and direct MR arthrography (MR-AG) of the wrist with regard to the depiction of the triangular fibro-cartilage (TFC). Fifteen consecutive patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain suspicious for TFC tear underwent both MSCT-AG and MR-AG of the wrist. Images obtained were evaluated by two radiologists in a blinded fashion for the depiction of six anatomical areas (radial, central and ulnar portion on the proximal and distal side) of the TFC by means of a five-point scoring system (1 = excellent visibility to 5 = not visible). Scores for MSCT-AG and MR-AG were compared using the Student's t-test. Mean scores for MSCT-AG and MR-AG, respectively, were 2.5/2.0, 3.2/2.5 and 2.8/2.4 for the radial, central and ulnar portion of the TFC on its proximal side, and 2.7/2.0, 3.1/2.3 and 2.9/2.4 for the radial, central and ulnar portion on its distal side (n = 15). Paired Student's t-test showed no significant difference between MSCT-AG and MR-AG (P > 0.05). In a first, small series, depiction of the TFC with MSCT-AG is comparable to that of MR-AG. Further evaluation of direct multi-slice CT arthrography of the wrist in a larger patient population would be promising.     

3.0T常规MRI与MR髋关节造影诊断髋臼唇撕裂的对比研究

目的 在3.0 T场强中,比较常规髋关节MRI及MR髋关节造影对髋臼唇撕裂的诊断价值.方法 回顾分析44例髋关节病变患者的患侧髋关节常规MRI及MR髋关节造影资料,将每例患者的臼唇划分为前、上、后3处区域(共计132处),确定有无撕裂,并进行分型.其中5例患者经髋关节镜检查.对于常规MRI及MR髋关节造影获得的臼唇撕裂及分型数据差异比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,一致性比较采用Kappa检验.结果 常规MRI与MR髋关节造影诊断完全相同者计116处臼唇,只有16处存在诊断差异.其中,前者诊断无撕裂而后者诊断撕裂者9处,前者诊断撕裂但后者诊断无撕裂者6处,其余1处两者均诊断为撕裂但分型不同.常规MRI与MR髋关节造影的评价差异没有统计学意义(Z=0.347,P＞0.05),且具有极好的一致性(K=0.781,P＜0.01).在接受关节镜的5例患者中,常规MRI、MR髋关节造影及关节镜结果均完全吻合.结论 对髋臼唇撕裂,3.0 T常规髋关节MRI可获得与MR髋关节造影基本相同的诊断效果.     

间接法MR膝关节造影在膝关节损伤诊断中的价值

目的:评价SE序列T1WI、SE序列T1WI并加FS和MTC技术以及GRE序列T2*WI三种MR扫描序列在间接法关节造影中诊断膝关节半月板及韧带损伤的价值。方法:分别应用间接法MR膝关节造影三种序列对51例膝关节损伤患者进行检查,并与关节镜手术临床诊断结果比较。结果:①在诊断前交叉韧带损伤上,T2WI序列的敏感度为60%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.605;加FS和MTC技术T1WI序列的敏感度为81.82%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.825;GRE序列的敏感度为36%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.313;②在诊断后交叉韧带损伤上,T2WI序列的敏感度为100%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.827;加FS和MTC技术T1WI序列的敏感度为100%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.827;GRE序列的敏感度为75%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.759;③在诊断半月板损伤上,T1WI序列的敏感度为95.56%、特异度为98.85%、Kappa值为0.926;加FS和MTC技术T2WI序列的敏感度为95.65%、特异度为99.23%、Kappa值为0.951;GRE序列的敏感度为93.75%、特异度为99.61%、Kappa值为0.928;④在诊断侧副韧带损伤上,T1WI序列的敏感度为77.27%、特异度为98.75%、Kappa值为0.823;加FS和MTC技术T1WI序列的敏感度为90%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.938;GRE序列的敏感度为73.91%、特异度为98.73%、Kappa值为0.712。结论:T1WI加FS及MTC技术序列是诊断膝关节损伤病变,尤其是前交叉韧带损伤的最佳序列。     

3.0 T conventional hip MR and hip MR arthrography for the acetabular labral tears confirmed by arthroscopy

Objective

To evaluate the value of hip MR for diagnosing acetabular labrum tears, and to further compare the diagnostic performances of conventional MR with MR arthrography in acetabular labrum tears.

Methods

90 patients undergoing both hip MR examination and subsequent hip arthroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. Of these patients, 34 accepted both conventional MR and MR arthrography; while the other 56 only underwent conventional MR examination. All hip MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists, and further compared with the results of hip arthroscopy.

Results

59 of 90 patients were confirmed with acetabular labral tears by hip arthroscopy and 31 without tears. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of conventional MR for evaluating the acetabular labral tears were 61.0%, 77.4%, 83.7% and 51.1% (radiologist A), and 66.1%, 74.2%, 82.9% and 53.4% (radiologist B), respectively, with good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.645). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MR arthrography for assessing the acetabular labral tears were 90.5%, 84.6%, 90.5% and 84.6% (radiologist A), and 95.2%, 84.6%, 90.9% and 91.7% (radiologist B), respectively, with excellent good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.810). The sensitivity and NPV of MR arthrography for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears were significantly higher than those of conventional MR (both P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Hip MR arthrography is a reliable evaluation modality for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears, and its diagnostic performance is superior to that of conventional MR at 3.0 T.     

Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography

The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis. Shoulder MR images of 28 patients with (n=14) and without (n=14) adhesive capsulitis were retrospectively analyzed. MR images were assessed for capsule and synovium thickness as well as the width of the axillary recess on oblique coronal fat-suppressed T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images, respectively. On oblique sagittal fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, the width of the rotator interval and the presence of abnormal tissue in the interval were evaluated. Significant differences were found between the two groups in capsule and synovium thickness on both sides of the recess on oblique coronal T2-weighted images (P=0.000), whereas thickness on the humeral aspect showed no significant difference on oblique coronal fat-suppressed T1-weighted images (P=0.109). On oblique coronal T2-weighted images, a cut-off value of 3-mm thickness gave the highest diagnostic accuracy for adhesive capsulitis with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 79% (11/14), 100% (14/14), and 89% (25/28) at the humeral side and 93% (13/14), 86% (12/14), and 89% (25/28) at the glenoid side, respectively. There were significant differences in rotator interval width, presence of abnormal tissue in the rotator interval, and axillary recess width between the two groups (P<0.05). Thickness of capsule and synovium of the axillary recess greater than 3 mm is a practical MR criterion for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis when measured on oblique coronal T2-weighted MR arthrography images without fat suppression. The presence of abnormal tissue in the rotator interval showed high sensitivity but rather low specificity.     

髋关节MR造影在髋臼唇撕裂诊断中的应用

目的 探讨髋关节MR造影在髋臼唇撕裂诊断中的应用价值.方法 临床高度怀疑髋臼唇撕裂的15例20个髋关节在透视下行髋关节穿刺造影,采用SE T1WI加脂肪抑制技术,进行髋关节冠状面、矢状面、斜轴面及放射状位扫描.其中12例行关节镜检查.结果 在行髋关节镜检查的12例14个髋关节中,11例13个髋关节MR造影诊断为髋臼唇撕裂,与关节镜诊断相符;1例MR造影示正常,关节镜检查亦未发现髋臼唇撕裂.13个髋臼唇撕裂中位于前上象限12个髋关节,后上象限1个髋关节.在关节镜诊断髋臼唇撕裂的13个髋关节中,MR造影冠状面诊断髋臼唇撕裂3个髋关节,矢状面诊断10个髋关节,斜轴面及放射状位诊断髋臼唇撕裂均为13个髋关节.15例20个髋关节中有5例6个髋关节在后下象限有髋臼唇下沟表现.结论 MR髋关节造影是诊断髋臼唇撕裂的可靠方法,扫描方法应选择T1WI加脂肪抑制的矢状面及斜轴面或矢状面加放射状位.后下象限撕裂的诊断中应注意正常变异的存在.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the application value of MR rthrography (MRA) in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. Methods Fifteen patients with a high degree of suspected acetabular labral tears received fluoroscope-guided injection of the contrast media into the hip joint ( hip arthrography) and fat-saturated spin-echo T1-weighted images were obtained in the coronal, sagittal, oblique-axial and radial planes. Hip arthroscopy was performed on 12 of them. Results Labral tears which were diagnosed in 11 patients by hip MRA were confirmed at hip arthroscopy. One patient showed no MRA indication of labral tear, also showed normal on arthroscopy. Tear in the anterior-superior quadrant 10 cases of 12 joints ( 12/13), posterior-superior quadrant 1 case of a joint (1/13). In 11 patients who underwent arthroscopy, hip MRA diagnosed 3 (3/13) joints labral tears in coronal planes, 10 (10/13) joints in sagittal planes and 13 (13/13) labral tears in axial-oblique and radial planes. In 15 patients with 20 hip joints, 5 cases 6 joints (6/20) with normal acetabular sublabral sulcus were performed. Conclusions MR arthrography of hip is a reliable method in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. Scanning method should be included fat-saturated spin-echo T1-weighted images in sagittal and oblique-axial planes or sagittal plus radial planes. The diagnosis of tor posterior-inferior quadrant should pay attention to the existence of a normal variation.     

上方盂唇前后向撕裂的肩关节MR造影评价

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of shoulder MR arthrography for superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions.Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 137 cases of shoulder MR arthrography confirmed by subsequent shoulder arthroscopy.Two radiologists analyzed all MR examinations independently and the results were compared with those of arthrescopy.The superior labrum was described as normal or torn.In addition, each iabral tear was classified as type Ⅰ-Ⅳ.Type Ⅰ lesions were defined as marked fraying of the articulating surface of the superior labrum; type Ⅱ, avulsion of the labral-bicipital complex from the ghnoid; type Ⅲ, displaced bucket handle tear of the superior labrum; and type Ⅳ, bucket handle tear of the superior labrum with extension into the fibers of the biceps tendon.Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated.Kappa values were calculated to quantify the level, of inter-observer agreement.Results SLAP lesions were arthroscopically diagnosed in 59 of the 137 patients.Six of the 59 lesions ( 10.2% ) were classified as type Ⅰ , 50 (84.7% ) as type Ⅱ, and 3 (5.1% ) as type Ⅲ.The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR arthrographic detection of SLAP lesions were 86.4% (51/59), 78.2% (61/78), and 81.8% ( 112/137), respectively, for observer A, and 88.1% (52/59), 84.6% (66/78), and 86.1% (118/137), respectively, for observer B.At inter-observer comparison, agreement was very good (Kappa values = 0.796 ).The MR arthrographic classification showed correlation with the arthroscopic classification of SLAP lesions were 83.1% (49/59)and 79.7% (47/59) for two observers, respectively.Conclusion Shoulder MR arthrography is a reliable method for evaluating SLAP lesions.     

Technical errors in MR arthrography

This article discusses potential technical problems of MR arthrography. It starts with contraindications, followed by problems relating to injection technique, contrast material and MR imaging technique. For some of the aspects discussed, there is only little published evidence. Therefore, the article is based on the personal experience of the author and on local standards of procedures. Such standards, as well as medico-legal considerations, may vary from country to country. Contraindications for MR arthrography include pre-existing infection, reflex sympathetic dystrophy and possibly bleeding disorders, avascular necrosis and known allergy to contrast media. Errors in injection technique may lead to extra-articular collection of contrast agent or to contrast agent leaking from the joint space, which may cause diagnostic difficulties. Incorrect concentrations of contrast material influence image quality and may also lead to non-diagnostic examinations. Errors relating to MR imaging include delays between injection and imaging and inadequate choice of sequences. Potential solutions to the various possible errors are presented.     

3.0TMR肩关节造影在前下盂唇变异型损伤诊断中的应用

目的:探讨3.0TMR关节造影在肩关节前下盂唇变异型损伤诊断及分型价值.方法:搜集2016年1月-2019年12月疑似肩关节前下盂唇损伤患者79例,以关节镜或开放术后诊断为标准,回顾性对比分析其术前常规MR检查及MR关节造影检查资料,利用统计学计算两种检查术前诊断及分型的灵敏度、特异度、准确性.使用McNemar检验分...     

间接磁共振膝关节腔内造影诊断膝关节半月板撕裂的价值

目的:通过比较临床检查、常规磁共振检查(MRI)、间接磁共振膝关节腔内造影检查(间接MRA)和膝关节镜术中所见,探讨间接MRA用于膝关节半月板撕裂诊断中的价值.材料和方法:本次研究中我们共收集125例曾行膝关节镜手术患者,全部患者都经过详细的病史采集和体格检查,其中57例患者术前行MRI检查,其中21例患者做MRI检查后立即做间接MRA,以膝关节镜为金标准,对各种检查发现进行互相比较.结果:①临床检查:敏感性75.47%、特异性69.44%、准确性72.00%.②MRI检查:敏感性82.86%、特异性54.55%、准确性71.93%.③间接MRA检查:敏感性100%、特异性90.00%、准确性95.23%.结论:间接MRA在诊断膝关节半月板撕裂方面具有很高的敏感性、特异性和准确性.     

磁共振肩关节造影在肩袖完全撕裂诊断的临床应用

目的:探讨磁共振肩关节造影检查对肩袖完全撕裂的诊断价值.方法:回顾性分析54例肩袖完全撕裂MR关节造影及MRI表现,与肩关节镜手术结果对照.结果:54例肩袖完全撕裂病例,MRI诊断的敏感度、特异度及准确度分别是87.03％、50.00％和79.41％;MR关节造影诊断Ⅰ型9例、Ⅱ型21例,其敏感度分别为88.89％、95.24％;特异度分别为97.87％、97.14％;准确度分别为96.43％、96.43％;明显高于常规MRI诊断,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);与关节镜结果对比,其一致性极佳(Kappa=0.841);而对于Ⅲ型肩袖完全撕裂,MR关节造影均不能显示.结论:MR关节造影能较准确判断Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型肩袖完全撕裂范围及程度,是MRI诊断肩袖损伤的有效补充,为临床诊断和治疗能提供更准确的依据,而对于Ⅲ型肩袖完全撕裂,MR关节造影不能显示其损伤部位及程度,无法对其进行诊断.     

Diagnostic value of MR arthrography in detection of intrinsic carpal ligament lesions: use of cine-MR arthrography as a new approach

Twenty-five patients with chronic wrist pain and a preliminary diagnosis of carpal instability were examined with conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography with single compartment intra-articular injection. A new cine-MR arthrography technique, with image acquisition at every 5 s during intra-articular injection, was performed in 17 subjects. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of MR arthrography in ligamentous lesions of the wrist and to assess the value of cine-MR arthrography in comparison with arthroscopy and/or surgery. Magnetic resonance arthrography, a semi-invasive technique, increased the diagnostic accuracy of intrinsic carpal ligament injuries. Cine-MR arthrography can be considered as a promising technique especially for the evaluation of lunatotriquetral and scapholunate ligament injuries of the wrist. Received 6 December 1995; Revision received 29 November 1996; Accepted 24 February 1997     

X线、CT和MR关节造影在外伤性肩袖撕裂中的诊断价值

目的　分析X线、CT和MR单对比关节造影在外伤性肩袖撕裂中的诊断价值。方法经关节镜证实的外伤性肩袖撕裂 2 0例。在透视下穿刺肩关节腔 ,注入 15～ 2 0ml的混合性对比剂 (由10ml欧乃派克和 2 0ml3mmol/L的马根维显稀释液组成 ) ,在 45min内完成X线摄片、CT和MR扫描。结果　关节镜证实肩袖的完全撕裂、部分撕裂分别为 9例和 11例。完全撕裂的X线、CT和MR关节造影均正确诊断 9例 (9/ 9)。肩袖部分撕裂的X线关节造影正确诊断 3例 (3/ 11) ;CT关节造影正确诊断 2例 (2 / 11) ;MR关节造影正确诊断 7例 (7/ 11)。结论　单对比的MR关节造影在外伤性肩袖撕裂中的诊断价值高于X线及CT造影