High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Detection of adenomas is an important goal of colonoscopy. Narrow band imaging (NBI) might highlight adenomas and lead to higher rates of adenoma detection. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial of colonoscopy withdrawal in white light versus NBI in 434 patients aged 50 years or older with intact colons. All examinations were performed by a single experienced endoscopist with a known high detection rate of adenomas using high-definition, wide-angle (170 degrees field of view) colonoscopes. RESULTS: There was no difference in the percent of patients with >or=1 adenoma for the entire cohort in white light (67%) versus NBI (65%) (P = .61) or in the subset of 257 patients with indication screening (58% vs 57%; P = .91). Both the prevalences of adenomas and the numbers of adenomas per colonoscopy are the highest ever reported in colonoscopy studies. The high prevalence rates of adenomas were accounted for by detection of large numbers of adenomas, including flat adenomas, which were 相似文献   

High-Definition White-Light (HDWL) Colonoscopy and Higher Adenoma Detection Rate and the Potential for Paradoxical Over Surveillance

Background

Patients undergoing high-definition white-light colonoscopy by a high adenoma detector may have a lower risk of interval adenoma detection on follow-up colonoscopy and may require less frequent follow-up but may paradoxically be assigned to more frequent surveillance when more adenomas are detected.

Aims

To evaluate whether high-definition white-light colonoscopy (vs. standard-definition white-light colonoscopy) and endoscopist adenoma detection rate (ADR) at index colonoscopy are associated with increased likelihood of adenomas at follow-up.

Methods

Longitudinal follow-up of prior cross-section cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy at baseline with at least one detected adenoma was included. Associations of type of white-light at index colonoscopy and the ADR of the endoscopist at index colonoscopy (high vs. low adenoma detector) were evaluated with various adenoma and polyp detection endpoints. Eighteen endoscopists were classified as high and low adenoma detectors based on the median ADR of 0.255.

Results

There were no significant differences in subsequent interval adenoma or polyp detection endpoints with regard to whether baseline exam was performed with high-definition white-light or standard-definition white-light colonoscopy nor between high and low ADR after adjusting for multiple testing (P ≤ 0.0029 considered significant). Prior to multiple testing adjustment, there was a significantly lower detection rate of hyperplastic polyps in the left colon (24 vs. 35 %, OR: 0.56, P = 0.033) at follow-up colonoscopy when baseline exam was performed with high-definition white-light index colonoscopy.

Conclusions

The results of this study do not support adjusting colonoscopy surveillance guidelines based on type of colonoscopy performed or the endoscopist’s ADR.     

Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon

AIM: To investigate the relation of patient characteristics and procedural parameters to the endoscopic detection rate of colonic adenomas. Further to study,which factors may be capable to predict the localization of adenomatous lesions.METHODS: We used the data base of a prospective randomized colonoscopy study(The Colo Cap trial) to identify patients being diagnosed with colon adenoma. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to reveal predictors for adenoma detection in the entire colon and also with respect to the proximal and distal part. Covariates including age, gender, duration of colonoscopy and comorbidities were defined to determine association between predictors and adenoma detection.RESULTS: Equal numbers of adenomas were detected in the proximal and distal side of the splenic flexure [126(57%) vs 94(43%), P = 0.104]. Simultaneous occurrence of adenomas in both sides of the colon was rare. The appearance of both proximal and distal adenoma was associated with increasing age(P = 0.008 and P = 0.024) and increasing duration of colonoscopy(P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). Male gender was a predictor for adenoma detection in the proximal colon(P = 0.008) but statistical significance was slightly missed with respect to the distal colon(P = 0.089). Alcohol abuse was found to be a predictor for the detection of distal adenoma(P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Increasing age and longer duration of colonoscopy are factors with a strong impact on adenoma detection both in the proximal and distal colon. Since proximal adenomas occurred in absence of distal adenomas, complete colonoscopy should be performed for screening.     

Prevalence of adenomas among young individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of adenomas in a young population not genetically predisposed for the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: The databases of the Dutch Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry were used. The study population included patients (n = 444) who had regular endoscopy until mutation analysis revealed they did not carry the (Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC)/Mismatch Repair) gene defect identified in their family. RESULTS: At first colonoscopy (n = 342; 50% males, mean age 37 yr) a total of 19 adenomas (10 males, mean age 50 yr, range 24-91 yr) and two CRCs (2 males, age 49 and 72 yr) were identified, and at first sigmoidoscopy (n = 102; 53% males, mean age 29 yr) three adenomas (2 males, age 8, 40, and 41 yr) were found. A second colonoscopy was performed in 14 patients with, and in 162 patients without an adenoma. Three of 14 patients (21%) developed a new adenoma (all >50 yr) and 8 of 162 (5%) patients developed their first adenoma during follow-up. In the colonoscopy group, the cumulative proportion of patients free of adenomas at age 50 yr was 86%. Of all adenomas diagnosed during colonoscopy (n = 49), 65% were located distal from the flexura lienalis. Of the adenomas detected during all endoscopies (n = 53), 9.8% were > or =7 mm, 7.5% showed high-grade dysplasia, and 7.5% showed tubulovillous features. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our findings during colonoscopy we conclude that the risk of developing adenomas/CRC in young individuals without genetic risk factors is low. Adenoma surveillance programs should focus on young individuals with a positive family (or personal) history for adenomas/CRC, or on individuals >50 yr.     

Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy

Background & AimsThe adenoma detection rate (ADR) and characteristics of previously resected adenomas are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. However, the combined effect of both factors on CRC mortality is unknown.Patients and methodsUsing data of the Austrian quality assurance program for screening colonoscopy, we evaluated the combined effect of ADR and lesion characteristics on subsequent risk for CRC mortality. We analyzed mortality rates for individuals with low-risk adenomas (1–2 adenomas <10 mm), individuals with high-risk adenomas (advanced adenomas or ≥3 adenomas), and after negative colonoscopy (negative colonoscopy or small hyperplastic polyps) performed by endoscopists with an ADR <25% compared with ≥25%. Cox regression was used to determine the association of combined risk groups with CRC mortality, adjusted for age and sex.ResultsWe evaluated 259,885 colonoscopies performed by 361 endoscopists. A total of 165 CRC-related deaths occurred during the follow-up period, up to 12.2 years. In all risk groups, CRC mortality was higher when colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist with an ADR <25%. Compared with negative colonoscopy with an ADR ≥25%, CRC mortality was similar for individuals with low-risk adenomas irrespective of ADR (for ADR ≥25%: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–2.49; for ADR <25%: adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.64–2.43) and after negative colonoscopy with ADR <25% (adjusted HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.81–2.00). Individuals with high-risk adenomas were at significantly higher risk for CRC death if colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist with an ADR <25% (adjusted HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.18–4.31) but not if performed by an endoscopist with an ADR ≥25% (adjusted HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.61–3.02).ConclusionsOur study adds important evidence for mandatory assessment and monitoring of performance quality in screening colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy was associated with a lower risk for CRC death, and the impact of ADR was strongest for individuals with high-risk adenomas.     

Risk factors for colorectal adenomas among immediate family members of patients with colorectal cancer in Taiwan: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of colorectal cancer or adenoma among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is significantly high. However, a well defined screening and surveillance consensus has not been developed for these families in Taiwan. We conducted this study to evaluate the colorectal adenoma prevalence pattern in screened immediate family members in Taiwan, and to derive implications for future screening programs. METHODS: A total of 234 immediate family members (aged 51.6 +/- 21.5 yr) of 186 patients with colorectal cancer were offered a colonoscopy. Each relative examined was then paired with two control subjects for age, sex, and symptoms. The prevalence of colorectal adenomas was then compared using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The estimated risk of developing adenomas among immediate family members of patients with colorectal cancer was significantly increased (OR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.43-3.78; p < 0.001). This trend was more striking for men (OR = 2.46; 95% CI, 1.40-4.31; p = 0.001). Immediate family members were at an increased risk for high-risk adenomas (> or = 1.0 cm, with a villous component, and/or with severe dysplasia) (OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 1.91-10.60; p = 0.002), and developed adenomas at an earlier age than did controls. Individuals with index cancer relatives diagnosed at < 50 yr of age or male relatives posed a higher risk of developing colorectal adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of colorectal adenoma in persons with a colorectal cancer family history in Taiwan is similar to that reported in Western countries. This high-risk population should be offered a screening colonoscopy beginning at 40 yr of age.     

Risk factors associated with the detection and missed diagnosis of colorectal flat adenoma: a Chinese multicenter observational study

Abstract

Objectives: Flat colorectal adenomas have a high risk of malignancy; however, their detection is often difficult due to their flat morphology. In this retrospective, large-scale study, we investigated the prevalence and characteristics of flat adenomas in a population in China.

Methods: We analyzed the data collected for 16951 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy at four participating hospitals between September 2013 and September 2015. All colonoscopies were performed without magnification.

Results: Among the 1,6951 patients, 2938 (17.3%) had adenoma and 796 (4.7%) had flat adenomas. The detection of flat adenoma showed a weak correlation with the detection of adenoma (r?=?0.666). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed the following independent factors influencing the detection of flat adenomas: patient-related factors of age, presence of warning symptoms, history of adenomas and bowel preparation as well as endoscopist-related factors of endoscopist’s level of proficiency, number of colonoscopy operators and withdrawal time.

Conclusions: The prevalence of flat adenomas in our study on Chinese patients was consistent with that reported from other countries. Factors conducive to the detection of flat adenomas were patient age of >?60 years, warning symptoms, history of adenoma, good bowel preparation, experienced endoscopist, single-operator colonoscopy and colonoscopy withdrawal time of >6?min.     

Colonic Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Persons with Negative Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Influence of Age, Gender, and Family History

Six hundred twenty-one asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests (ages 50–75 yr), including 496 with no known risk factors for colorectal cancer and 125 with a single first-degree relative with a history of colonic neoplasia developed after age 40, underwent screening colonoscopy. Three Dukes A cancers were detected in average-risk persons. The overall prevalence of adenomatous polyps was 27%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that increasing age and male gender were both strong predictors of colonic neoplasia ( p < 0.001). A positive family history of a single first-degree relative with colorectal cancer was not associated with an increased prevalence of colonic neoplasia ( p = 0.29), although an effect may be present if the relative was <60 yr at diagnosis. Overall 16% of males and 7% of women > 60 yr had at least one adenoma that was large (>1 cm in size), villous or tubulovillous, or had grade 3 dysplasia. We conclude that the prevalence of colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests is substantial, particularly in elderly males. A family history of a single first-degree relative diagnosed at age >60 yr with colorectal cancer is not associated with an increased prevalence of colonic adenomas.     

Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the time of day in computer-aided detection colonoscopy

Because of endoscopist fatigue, the time of colonoscopy have been shown to influence adenoma detection rate (ADR). Computer-aided detection (CADe) provides simultaneous visual alerts on polyps during colonoscopy and thus to increase adenoma detection rate. This is attributable to the strengthening of endoscopists diagnostic level and alleviation of fatigue. The aim of the study was to investigate whether CADe colonoscopy could eliminate the influence of the afternoon fatigue on ADR.We retrospectively analyzed the recorded data of patients who were performed CADe colonoscopy from September 2017 to February 2019 in Endoscopy Center of Sichuan Provincial People''s Hospital. Patients demographic as well as baseline data recorded during colonoscopy were used for the analysis. Morning colonoscopy was defined as colonoscopic procedures starting between 8:00 am and 12:00 noon. Afternoon colonoscopy was defined as procedures starting at 2:00 pm and thereafter. The primary outcome was ADR. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis were also performed.A total of 484 CADe colonoscopies were performed by 4 endoscopists in the study. The overall polyp detection rate was 52% and overall ADR was 35.5%. The mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy (0.62 vs 0.61, P > .05) and ADR (0.36 vs 0.35, P > .05) were similar in the am and pm group. Multivariable analysis shows that the ADR of CADe colonoscopy was influenced by the age (P < .001), gender (P = .004) and withdrawal time (P < .001), no correlation was found regarding bowel preparation (P = .993) and endoscopist experience (P = .804).CADe colonoscopy could eliminate the influence of the afternoon fatigue on ADR. The ADR during CADe colonoscopy is significantly affected by age, gender and withdrawal time.     

结肠镜检查中大肠腺瘤的漏诊率及漏诊相关危险因素

目的 明确结肠镜检查中大肠腺瘤的漏诊率及漏诊腺瘤特征,探讨腺瘤漏诊的相关危险因素.方法 患者在初次结肠镜检查发现并切除腺瘤后120 d内进行结肠镜复查,分析2次结肠镜检查结果.记录2次结肠镜检查所见腺瘤的特征(包括大小、部位、形态、数目及病理)、患者临床特征(包括年龄、性别、结肠镜检查原因、腹部及盆腔手术史、大肠憩室病史及是否行无痛结肠镜检查)及不同的内镜操作医师.分析不同类型腺瘤在结肠镜检查中的漏诊率以及腺瘤特征、患者临床特征和内镜医师的操作水平对腺瘤漏诊的影响.结果 809例患者中271例发生腺瘤漏诊,2次结肠镜检查共检出腺瘤2134颗,漏诊腺瘤425颗,腺瘤总漏诊率为20%(425/2134);平均患者腺瘤漏诊率为33%(271/809).腺瘤体积大者,漏诊率低(P<0.01);乙状结肠、肝曲、盲肠和升结肠部位的腺瘤以及平坦型腺瘤容易漏诊(P<0.05);患者腺瘤数越多在结肠镜检查中腺瘤漏诊率越高(P<0.01);初级内镜医师与有经验内镜医师相比,其漏诊率明显增加(P<0.01).结论 结肠镜检查中存在部分腺瘤漏诊,腺瘤漏诊与腺瘤大小、形态、部位、数目以及结肠镜检查操作医师密切相关.     

结肠镜检查中大肠腺瘤的漏诊率及漏诊相关危险因素

目的 明确结肠镜检查中大肠腺瘤的漏诊率及漏诊腺瘤特征,探讨腺瘤漏诊的相关危险因素.方法 患者在初次结肠镜检查发现并切除腺瘤后120 d内进行结肠镜复查,分析2次结肠镜检查结果.记录2次结肠镜检查所见腺瘤的特征(包括大小、部位、形态、数目及病理)、患者临床特征(包括年龄、性别、结肠镜检查原因、腹部及盆腔手术史、大肠憩室病史及是否行无痛结肠镜检查)及不同的内镜操作医师.分析不同类型腺瘤在结肠镜检查中的漏诊率以及腺瘤特征、患者临床特征和内镜医师的操作水平对腺瘤漏诊的影响.结果 809例患者中271例发生腺瘤漏诊,2次结肠镜检查共检出腺瘤2134颗,漏诊腺瘤425颗,腺瘤总漏诊率为20%(425/2134);平均患者腺瘤漏诊率为33%(271/809).腺瘤体积大者,漏诊率低(P<0.01);乙状结肠、肝曲、盲肠和升结肠部位的腺瘤以及平坦型腺瘤容易漏诊(P<0.05);患者腺瘤数越多在结肠镜检查中腺瘤漏诊率越高(P<0.01);初级内镜医师与有经验内镜医师相比,其漏诊率明显增加(P<0.01).结论 结肠镜检查中存在部分腺瘤漏诊,腺瘤漏诊与腺瘤大小、形态、部位、数目以及结肠镜检查操作医师密切相关.     

¿Influye el posible cansancio del endoscopista en la frecuencia de colonoscopias incompletas y de las lesiones polipoideas diagnosticadas?

Introduction

Nowadays, the possible effect of endoscopist fatigue on the results of colonoscopies is under discussion. We aimed to analyze possible differences in cecal intubation and the polyp and adenoma detection rate, depending on whether colonoscopies were performed at the beginning or at the end of the daily endoscopy session and to analyze the influence of the queue position on the detection rate.

Patients and methods

A retrospective study was performed with 1,000 ambulatory and consecutive colonoscopies, divided into 2 groups: «early» and «late» procedures. A total of 95 colonoscopies were excluded due to poor colon cleansing. After confirming that patient characteristics were homogenous in the two groups, we compared the frequency of complete colonoscopies and the polyp and adenoma detection rate. Possible differences between the 2 groups in the polyp detection rate according to the colonoscopy schedule were analyzed.

Results

The overall polyp and adenoma detection rates were 44.2 and 30.5%, respectively, with no significant differences among 13 different endoscopists; polyps: p = 0.21; adenomas: p = 0.63. No significant differences were found between the «early group» (n= 532) and the «late group» (n = 373) in the rates of complete colonoscopies [97.2 vs 99.4% (p = 0.92)], the polyp detection rate [45.9 vs 41.8% (p = 0.23)], the adenoma detection rate [30.8 vs 30% (p = 0.80)] or the serrated adenoma rate [2.1% vs 1.6% (p = 0.62)]. The lesion detection rate did not vary in relation to the «queue position»: polyps [p = 0.60, and adenomas: p = 0.83.

Conclusions

In our series, endoscopist fatigue at the end of the day had no influence on the complete colonoscopy rate or on the polyp and adenoma detection rate. There were no differences in the number of polypoid lesions detected according to the timing of the colonoscopy schedule.     

结肠镜检查中大肠腺瘤的漏诊率及漏诊相关危险因素

目的 明确结肠镜检查中大肠腺瘤的漏诊率及漏诊腺瘤特征,探讨腺瘤漏诊的相关危险因素.方法 患者在初次结肠镜检查发现并切除腺瘤后120 d内进行结肠镜复查,分析2次结肠镜检查结果.记录2次结肠镜检查所见腺瘤的特征（包括大小、部位、形态、数目及病理）、患者临床特征（包括年龄、性别、结肠镜检查原因、腹部及盆腔手术史、大肠憩室病史及是否行无痛结肠镜检查）及不同的内镜操作医师.分析不同类型腺瘤在结肠镜检查中的漏诊率以及腺瘤特征、患者临床特征和内镜医师的操作水平对腺瘤漏诊的影响.结果 809例患者中271例发生腺瘤漏诊,2次结肠镜检查共检出腺瘤2134颗,漏诊腺瘤425颗,腺瘤总漏诊率为20%（425/2134）;平均患者腺瘤漏诊率为33%（271/809）.腺瘤体积大者,漏诊率低（P〈0.01）;乙状结肠、肝曲、盲肠和升结肠部位的腺瘤以及平坦型腺瘤容易漏诊（P〈0.05）;患者腺瘤数越多在结肠镜检查中腺瘤漏诊率越高（P〈0.01）;初级内镜医师与有经验内镜医师相比,其漏诊率明显增加（P〈0.01）.结论 结肠镜检查中存在部分腺瘤漏诊,腺瘤漏诊与腺瘤大小、形态、部位、数目以及结肠镜检查操作医师密切相关.     

Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy is an excellent but imperfect modality for colorectal cancer screening and prevention. We studied the effects of a retractable transparent extension device on adenoma detection rate as well as on intubation and withdrawal times. METHODS: Colonoscopy with or without the transparent retractable extension (TRE) was performed by one endoscopist. A subset of patients with colonic adenomas were randomized to repeat colonoscopy with or without a TRE device. Adenoma removal was done at the second colonoscopy. The principal outcome parameters were the cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, and the number, size, and location of adenomas detected. RESULTS: The study was done in two parts. First, 835 patients underwent colonoscopy with or without the TRE. The patients' demographic characteristics, the indications for colonoscopy, the cecal intubation time and withdrawal time, and the proportion of patients with adenomas (29.0%vs 24.1%) (P= 0.11) were similar between the two techniques. The number of adenomas detected with the TRE was significantly higher than that without the extension (205 vs 150) (P= 0.04). Second, 60 patients with adenomas found at colonoscopy without the device were randomized to repeat colonoscopy within 3 months. Hood-assisted colonoscopy revealed 20% more adenomas than the initial procedure compared to a 4% increase without the hood (P= 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy with a TRE device improved the adenoma detection rate without affecting intubation and withdrawal times.     

Can the Adenoma Detection Rate Reliably Identify Low-Performing Endoscopists? Results of a Modeling Study

Background

Experts have stated that adenoma detection rates (ADR) of individual endoscopists should be measured to assess colonoscopy quality.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to quantify the reliability of the ADR as a quality marker.

Methods

We simulated a population of endoscopists and patients using published data on adenoma prevalence and adenoma miss rates. For each endoscopist, the ADR was calculated. The proportion of ADR variance attributable to endoscopist and the area under the ROC (AUROC) curve for low-performing endoscopists (lowest quartile or decile) were also calculated.

Results

In the base-case analysis (200 patients per endoscopist, miss rate 22 %, adenoma prevalence 24 %), only 13 % of ADR variance was attributable to endoscopist performance (AUROC up to 0.73). An ADR cutoff of <16.5 % identified approximately half of endoscopists in the lowest performance decile (test sensitivity = 53 %), but most (79 %) of the endoscopists identified by this cutoff were NOT low performers (i.e., false positives). In sensitivity analysis, increasing the number of patients per endoscopist, reducing the variance of adenoma prevalence between endoscopists (i.e., performing case-mix adjustment), and increasing the variance in performance between endoscopists all improved ADR test characteristics (AUROC up to 0.88). However, regardless of assumptions, a substantial proportion of endoscopists would be misclassified if a simple ADR cutoff were utilized.

Conclusions

The ADR has limited reliability as a quality marker under real-world assumptions. Simple cutoffs are likely to either be insufficiently sensitive or have high false positive rates. Future studies should identify alternative means for assessing endoscopist performance.     

Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multiple factors influence the yield of colonoscopy for the detection of neoplasia. Few studies have addressed the impact of colonoscopy duration on procedure yield. The aim of our study was to determine whether endoscopist-specific procedure times correlate with the number and clinical significance of polyps detected at screening or surveillance colonoscopy. METHODS: Procedural data from screening or surveillance colonoscopies performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, between January 1, 1996 and June 30, 2000, were reviewed. Individual endoscopists were characterized by their personal endoscopist procedure mean time (EPMT) to perform a negative colonoscopy. Procedure time included patient's consent and sedation. EPMT was then correlated with individual polyp detection rates. RESULTS: Overall, 10,159 colonoscopies were reviewed of which 4,312 (42.4%) yielded polyps. Polyp detection varied among endoscopists between 19.0% and 62.3%. There was a close correlation between EPMT and polyp yield (all sizes), r = 0.64, although correlation was weaker for polyps >10 mm (r = 0.42) and polyps >20 mm (r = 0.20). On multivariate analysis, longer mean endoscopist time was associated with colonic lesion detection, OR = 1.54 (95% CI 1.37-1.62). Longer mean procedure duration demonstrated a looser association with identification of polyps >10 mm, OR = 1.40 (1.19-1.64) and polyps >20 mm, OR = 1.03 (0.74-1.43). CONCLUSIONS: There is a direct correlation between colonoscopy procedure time and yield, with a three-fold variation of polyp detection rates. These results should prompt future prospective studies assessing the impact of colonoscopic withdrawal time on lesion detection.     

Impacto del proceso de enseñanza endoscópica en la detección de adenomas colónicos

BackgroundThere has been little reported experience in the Latin American hospital setting in relation to the impact of the endoscopic training process on colonoscopy quality.AimsTo determine the effect that training in the technique of colonoscopy has on adenoma detection in an Argentinian teaching hospital.Material and methodWithin the time frame of July 2012 and July 2013, 3 physicians received training in colonoscopy from 4 experienced endoscopists. The colonoscopies performed by the supervised trainees were compared with those carried out by the experienced endoscopists.ResultsA total of 318 colonoscopies performed by any one of the 3 supervised trainees and 367 carried out by any one of the experienced endoscopists were included. The univariate analysis showed a non-significant difference in the detection rate of adenomas (30.4 vs. 24.7%, P = .09). In the multivariate analysis, the detection rate of adenomas was significantly higher in the colonoscopies performed by one of the 3 trainees (odds ratio = 1.72 [1.19-2.48]).ConclusionsThe supervised involvement of endoscopic trainees has a positive effect on adenoma detection.     

Colonoscopy screening in the elderly: when to stop?

OBJECTIVES: The age to begin colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is based on the risk of neoplasia and is published in screening guidelines. The age to stop screening is unknown but should be based, in part, on the same principle. The purpose of this study was to establish whether the prevalence of neoplasia detected by colonoscopy diminished with advancing age, to warrant ceasing colonoscopic screening. METHODS: The endoscopic and pathology reports of all asymptomatic subjects undergoing colonoscopy for the purpose of CRC screening or an evaluation of abdominal pain or change in bowel habits between 1997 and 2000 were reviewed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of age, gender, and indication for examination on the prevalence of neoplasia, as well as on having more than two adenomas, advanced adenomas (tubulovillous, villous, severe dysplasia, or size > or = 1 cm), and invasive cancers. RESULTS: A total of 915 patients were included. Of these, 50% were male, with a mean age of 65 yr (range 50-100). Neoplasia peaked in the seventh decade, with a fall thereafter (p = 0.009). Numerous adenomas, advanced adenomas, and invasive cancers increased with age. The yield for overall neoplasia, advanced adenomas, and more than two adenomas was higher in the screening group than in the symptomatic group. More invasive cancers were found in the symptomatic group compared with the asymptomatic group, but this did not achieve statistical significance (4 vs 1, p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of advanced neoplasia continues to increase with age. Subjects undergoing colonoscopy for screening had a greater risk for neoplasia than did subjects with symptoms. There is no decline in yield of advanced neoplasia to justify stopping screening colonoscopy in the elderly.     

Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study is an ongoing flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening trial for colorectal cancer. Twenty-one thousand average-risk individuals, aged 50-64 years, living in two separate areas in Norway were randomly drawn from the Population Registry and invited to once-only screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Examinations were performed over 3 years, at 2 centres, by 8 different endoscopists, using the same type of equipment. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible differences between endoscopists in detecting individuals with polyps, adenomas and advanced lesions (adenomas with severe dysplasia and/or villous components and/or size larger than 9 mm and carcinoma) in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. METHODS: The present trial comprises data from 8822 individuals, aged 55-64 years, who have undergone a flexible sigmoidoscopy. In the study period, all lesions detected by the different endoscopists were registered. Tissue samples were taken from all lesions detected. RESULTS: Detection rates varied significantly between endoscopists, ranging from 36.4% to 65.5% for individuals with any polyp, from 12.7% to 21.2% for any adenoma and from 2.9% to 5.0% for advanced lesions. In a multiple logistic regression model, the performing endoscopist was a strong independent predictor for detection of individuals with polyps (P < 0.001 ), adenomas (P < 0.001) and advanced lesions (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Detection rates for colorectal lesions vary significantly between endoscopists in colorectal cancer screening. Establishing systems for monitoring performance in screening programmes is important. Supervised training and re-certification for endoscopists with poor performance should be considered.     

Yield of advanced adenoma and cancer based on polyp size detected at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Observational screening of the colon with subsequent referral for colonoscopy raises questions about the threshold of polyp size that necessitates referral. To examine the yield at colonoscopy when a given size lesion is observed, we assessed the yield of advanced adenoma and cancer at colonoscopy based on the size of the abnormality detected at flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSG). METHODS: We used data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, a randomized, controlled, community-based study of FSG. RESULTS: Subsequent colonoscopy was performed on 10,850 subjects (60.4% male; mean age, 62.9 years) with a polyp visualized on screening FSG. For women with a polyp 0.5-0.9 cm on FSG (n = 1426), the yield in the distal colon on colonoscopy was 0.6% for cancer (number needed to screen [NNS] = 166) and 14.5% for advanced adenoma (NNS = 7). In men (n = 2183), the yield was 0.7% (NNS = 142) for cancer and 15.9% (NNS = 6) for advanced adenoma. Among persons with polyps 0.5-0.9 cm identified on FSG, 5.5% (198/3609) had distal advanced adenomas that measured <1.0 cm but had villous histology or high-grade dysplasia, and 9.9% (357/3609) had adenomas > or =1 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The yield for a distal advanced adenomatous lesion when a polyp 0.5-0.9 cm is observed at FSG is substantial and is due to the presence of advanced histology in polyps <1 cm and to detection of polyps that measure > or =1.0 cm on colonoscopy. Establishing thresholds for observation versus evaluation will require careful assessment of the overall yield.