The motivation and capacity to go ‘above and beyond’: Qualitative analysis of free-text survey responses in the M@NGO randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery

Objectiveto explore whether women allocated to caseload care characterise their midwife differently to those allocated to standard care.Designmulti-site unblinded, randomised, controlled, parallel-group trial.Settingthe study was conducted in two metropolitan teaching hospitals across two Australian cities.Populationwomen of all obstetric risk were eligible to participate. Inclusion criteria were: 18 years or older, less than 24 week’s gestation with a singleton pregnancy. Women already booked with a care provider or planning to have an elective caesarean section were excluded.Interventionsparticipants were randomised to caseload midwifery or standard care. The caseload model provided antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care from a primary midwife or ‘back-up’ midwife; as well as consultation with obstetric or medical physicians as indicated by national guidelines. The standard model included care from a general practitioner and/or midwives and obstetric doctors.Measurements and findingsparticipants’ responses to open-ended questions were collected through a 6-week postnatal survey and analysed thematically. A total of 1748 women were randomised between December 2008 – May 2011; 871 to caseload midwifery and 877 to standard care. The response rate to the 6-week survey including free text items was 52% (n=901). Respondents from both groups characterised midwives as Informative, Competent and Kind. Participants in the caseload group perceived midwives with additional qualities conceptualised as Empowering and ‘Endorphic’. These concepts highlight some of the active ingredients that moderated or mediated the effects of the midwifery care within the M@NGO trial.Key conclusioncaseload midwifery attracts, motivates and enables midwives to go Above and Beyond such that women feel empowered, nurtured and safe during pregnancy, labour and birth.Implications for practicethe concept of an Endorphic midwife makes a useful contribution to midwifery theory as it enhances our understanding of how the complex intervention of caseload midwifery influences normal birth rates and experiences. Defining personal midwife attributes which are important for caseload models has potential implications for graduate attributes in degree programs leading to registration as a midwife and selection criteria for caseload midwife positions.     

A qualitative study of how caseload midwifery is constituted and experienced by Danish midwives

Objectivethe aim of this study is to advance knowledge about the working and living conditions of midwives in caseload midwifery and how this model of care is embedded in a standard maternity unit. This led to two research questions: 1) What constitutes caseload midwifery from the perspectives of the midwives? 2) How do midwives experience working in caseload midwifery?Design and settingphenomenology of practice was the analytical approach to this qualitative study of caseload midwifery in Northern Denmark. The methodology was inspired by ethnography, and applied methods were field observations followed by interviews.Participantsthirteen midwives working in caseloads were observed during one or two days in the antenatal clinic and were interviewed at a later occasion.Findingsbeing recognised and the feeling of doing high quality care generate high job satisfaction. The obligation and pressure to perform well and the disadvantages to the midwives׳ personal lives are counterbalanced by the feeling of doing a meaningful and important job. Working in caseload midwifery creates a feeling of working in a self-governing model within the public hospital, without losing the technological benefits of a modern birth unit. Midwives in caseload midwifery worked on welcoming and including all pregnant women allocated to their care; even women/families where relationships with the midwives were challenging were recognised and respected.Key conclusionscaseload midwifery is a work-form with an embedded and inevitable commitment and obligation that brings forward the midwife׳s desire to do her utmost and in return receive appreciation, social recognition and a meaningful job with great job satisfaction. There is a balance between the advantages of a meaningful job and the disadvantages for the personal life of the midwife, but benefits were found to outweigh disadvantages.Implications for practiceIn expanding caseload midwifery, it is necessary to understand that the midwives׳ personal lives need to be prepared for this work-form. The number of women per full time midwife has to be surveilled as job-satisfaction is dependent on the midwives׳ ability of fulfilling expectations of being present at women׳s births.     

An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives’ working in midwifery group practice

Objective

to examine changes in midwives’ attitudes to their professional role following the introduction of midwifery group practice (MGP) (a caseload model of midwifery continuity of care provided to women of all risk levels) and to explore aspects of the model that were working well and those that were not working well.

Design

the questionnaire ‘Attitudes to Professional Role’ was used to measure midwives’ satisfaction in terms of professional satisfaction, professional support, client interaction, and professional development. Open-ended questions were also included to offer an opportunity for midwives to expand on their experiences of working in the MGP model. The questionnaire was administered at five time points over the 18-month evaluation period. Round 1 was prior to the implementation of MGP, Rounds 2–4 were at three-month intervals, with Round 5 six months later. Analysis of the structured part of the questionnaire was undertaken by comparing mean scores of satisfaction ranging from −2 (very negative attitudes) to +2 (very positive attitudes), and the open-ended questions were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Setting

the Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.

Participants

questionnaires were distributed to all midwives (n=15) working in MGP in Rounds 1, 2 and 3, and to the 12 midwives remaining from the original sample in Rounds 4 and 5. Fourteen questionnaires were returned in Round 1, 12 in Round 2, 10 in Round 3, nine in Round 4, and 10 in Round 5.

Findings

overall, a positive change in attitudes to professional role was reflected in all sub-scales in the period between start-up and 18 months later; a reduction in scores occurred in Round 3. The mean increases were significant for all sub-scales apart from professional development. Five main themes were identified across the rounds in the content analysis: ‘continuity of care’, ‘working pattern’, ‘working environment’, ‘collegiality’ and ‘issues relating to midwifery practice’. Midwives gained particular satisfaction from providing continuity of care and building relationships with women and their families, and through practising autonomously as a midwife. While there was a struggle to manage the hours worked and being on call, high levels of professional satisfaction were maintained.

Key conclusions

while there were aspects of MGP that midwives were not satisfied with and wanted to change, overall they were satisfied with the model.

Implications

there is a need for ongoing evaluation in order to monitor the short- and long-term impact on midwives of working in a caseload model of continuity of midwifery care.     

Midwifery continuity: The use of social media

BackgroundContinuity models of midwifery care improve women’s experiences of care and clinical outcomes, but organisationally driven working practices do not facilitate a continuity model and the midwifery care received by most women is fragmented (Sandall et al., 2016, NHS England, 2016). Little is known about the potential for continuity of midwifery care to be achieved using an electronic platform. This paper examines the experiences of women accessing known midwives through a social media platform and their experiences and perception of continuity of care.MethodsThe study forms part of a larger research project aiming to increase understanding about online social learning within professionally moderated social media based communities. This paper reports specifically the concept of midwifery continuity within the online communities. Two secret Facebook groups consisting of 31 mothers and 4 midwife moderators were created (17 mothers & 2 midwives / 14 mothers & 2 midwives). Primary data included 8 online and face to face focus groups, conducted at approximately 10 week intervals, and 28 individual one to one interviews with members of the online community within six weeks of giving birth.Data analysisA thematic analysis using a priori themes was undertaken. This involved coding data which evidenced relational, informational and management continuity across the entire dataset (28 interviews and 8 focus groups). The analysis was undertaken broadly following the six stages described by Braun and Clarke (2006).FindingsRelational and informational continuity were identified across the data. Relational continuity was evident for both the participants and the midwife moderators; informational continuity was described by the participants. Management continuity was not identified. Continuity through social media use was valued by both the mothers and the midwives.ConclusionInformation and relational continuity needs of women can be met using professionally moderated, social media based groups. They may provide an alternative means of facilitating the continuity that is so often lacking in traditional models of care.     

Midwives' perceptions of organisational structures and processes influencing their ability to provide caseload care to socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women

Objective

this study examined midwives' perceptions of organisational structures and processes of care when working in a caseload model (Midwifery Group Practice MGP) for socially disadvantaged and vulnerable childbearing women.

Design

this study used Donabedian's theoretical framework for evaluating the quality of health care provision. Of the 17 eligible midwives, 15 participated in focus group discussions and two others provided written comments. Thematic analysis was guided by three headings; clinical outcomes, processes of care and organisational structure.

Findings

midwives believed they provided an excellent service to socially disadvantaged and vulnerable childbearing women. Midwives gained satisfaction from working in partnership with women, working across their full scope of practice, and making a difference to the women. However the midwives perceived the MGP was situated within an organisation that was hostile to the caseload model of care. Midwives felt frustrated and distressed by a lack of organisational support for the model and a culture of blame dominated by medicine. A lack of material resources and no identified office space created feelings akin to ‘homelessness’. Together these challenges threatened the cohesiveness of the MGP and undermined midwives' ability to advocate for women and keep birth normal.

Key conclusions

if access to caseload midwifery care for women with diverse backgrounds and circumstances is to be enhanced, then mechanisms need to be implemented to ensure organisational structures and processes are developed to sustain midwives in the provision of ‘best practice’ maternity care.

Implications for practice

women accessing midwifery caseload care have excellent maternal and newborn outcomes. However there remains limited understanding of the impact of organisational structures and processes of care on clinical outcomes.     

Temporal changes in key maternal and fetal factors affecting birth outcomes: A 32-year population-based study in an industrial city

Background

In Australia and internationally, there is concern about the growing proportion of women giving birth by caesarean section. There is evidence of increased risk of placenta accreta and percreta in subsequent pregnancies as well as decreased fertility; and significant resource implications. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of continuity of midwifery care have reported reduced caesareans and other interventions in labour, as well as increased maternal satisfaction, with no statistically significant differences in perinatal morbidity or mortality. RCTs conducted in the UK and in Australia have largely measured the effect of teams of care providers (commonly 6–12 midwives) with very few testing caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care. This study aims to determine whether caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care for women at low risk of medical complications decreases the proportion of women delivering by caesarean section compared with women receiving 'standard' care. This paper presents the trial protocol in detail.

Methods/design

A two-arm RCT design will be used. Women who are identified at low medical risk will be recruited from the antenatal booking clinics of a tertiary women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Baseline data will be collected, then women randomised to caseload midwifery or standard low risk care. Women allocated to the caseload intervention will receive antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a designated primary midwife with one or two antenatal visits conducted by a 'back-up' midwife. The midwives will collaborate with obstetricians and other health professionals as necessary. If the woman has an extended labour, or if the primary midwife is unavailable, care will be provided by the back-up midwife. For women allocated to standard care, options include midwifery-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care and community based general medical practitioner care. Data will be collected at recruitment (self administered survey) and at 2 and 6 months postpartum by postal survey. Medical/obstetric outcomes will be abstracted from the medical record. The sample size of 2008 was calculated to identify a decrease in caesarean birth from 19 to 14% and detect a range of other significant clinical differences. Comprehensive process and economic evaluations will be conducted.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012607000073404.     

An ethnographic study of women's experience of partnership caseload midwifery practice: the professional as a friend

OBJECTIVES: To explore the experience of a known midwife for labour and birth as provided through the partnership caseload model of care in women who had a previous baby under an alternative system of care. DESIGN: A qualitative study using an ethnographic approach. Data were collected by tape-recorded interviews. SETTING: The maternity unit at Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust, Leicester, UK in 1998. PARTICIPANTS: 10 multiparous women cared for by Birth Under Midwifery Practice Scheme (BUMPS) midwives were interviewed between eight- and 12 weeks' postpartum. KEY FINDINGS: Women's perceptions and experiences were predominantly influenced by the relationships they had with their midwives who they described as 'friends'. All other themes were filtered through these relationships, including previous negative experiences of maternity care, the valuing of a known midwife for labour and birth, their positive birth experiences, expressions of delight at their care, their liking of home antenatal care, and the appreciation of their existing children and partners meeting their midwives. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Partnership caseload midwifery practice has significant positive impact on women's experience of childbirth. The midwife/woman relationship that has evolved in this context is highly valued by women and challenges traditional professional roles. The model should be explored in other settings to see if its benefits to women are transferable.     

The costs of 'being with the woman': secondary traumatic stress in midwifery

Objectiveit is widely acknowledged that caring can cause emotional suffering in health-care professionals. The concepts of compassion fatigue, post-traumatic stress disorder and secondary traumatic stress are used to describe the potential consequences of caring for people who are or have experienced trauma. Empathy between the professional and patient or client is a key feature in the development of secondary traumatic stress. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the conceptual development of theory about dynamics in the midwife–woman relationship in the context of traumatic birth events, and to stimulate debate and research into the potential for traumatic stress in midwives who provide care in and through relationships with women.Methodthe relevant literature addressing secondary traumatic stress in health-care professionals was reviewed.Findingsit is argued that the high degree of empathic identification which characterises the midwife–woman relationship in midwifery practice places midwives at risk of experiencing secondary traumatic stress when caring for women experiencing traumatic birth. It is suggested that this has harmful consequences for midwives’ own mental health and for their capacity to provide care in their relationships with women, threatening the distinct nature of midwifery care.Conclusionsopportunities for research to establish the existence of this phenomenon, and the potential implications for midwifery practice are identified.     

Project 20: Midwives’ insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works,for whom,in what circumstances,and how

IntroductionContinuity of care models are known to improve clinical outcomes for women and their babies, but it is not understood how. A realist synthesis of how women with social risk factors experience UK maternity care reported mechanisms thought to improve clinical outcomes and experiences. As part of a broader programme of work to test those theories and fill gaps in the literature base we conducted focus groups with midwives working within continuity of care models of care for women with social factors that put them at a higher chance of having poor birth outcomes. These risk factors can include poverty and social isolation, asylum or refugee status, domestic abuse, mental illness, learning difficulties, and substance abuse problems.ObjectiveTo explore the insights of midwives working in continuity models of care for women with social risk factors in order to understand the resources they provide, and how the model of care can improve women’s outcomes.DesignRealist methodology was used to gain a deeper understanding of how women react to specific resources that the models of care offer and how these resources are thought to lead to particular outcomes for women. Twelve midwives participated, six from a continuity of care model implemented in a community setting serving an area of deprivation in London, and six from a continuity of care model for women with social risk factors, based within a large teaching hospital in London.FindingsThree main themes were identified: ‘Perceptions of the model of care, ‘Tailoring the service to meet women’s needs’, ‘Going above and beyond’. Each theme is broken down into three subthemes to reveal specific resources or mechanisms which midwives felt might have an impact on women’s outcomes, and how women with different social risk factors respond to these mechanisms.Conclusions/implications for practiceOverall the midwives in both models of care felt the service was beneficial to women and had a positive impact on their outcomes. It was thought the trusting relationships they had built with women enabled midwives to guide women through a fragmented, unfamiliar system and respond to their individual physical, emotional, and social needs, whilst ensuring follow-up of appointments and test results. Midwives felt that for these women the impact of a trusting relationship affected how much information women disclosed, allowing for enhanced, needs led, holistic care. Interesting mechanisms were identified when discussing women who had social care involvement with midwives revealing techniques they used to advocate for women and help them to regain trust in the system and demonstrate their parenting abilities. Differences in how each team provided care and its impact on women’s outcomes were considered with the midwives in the community-based model reporting how their location enabled them to help women integrate into their local community and make use of specialist services. The study demonstrates the complexity of these models of care, with midwives using innovative and compassionate ways of working to meet the multifaceted needs of this population.     

Becoming an ‘Amai’: Meanings and experiences of motherhood amongst Zimbabwean women living in Melbourne,Australia

Backgroundlittle is known about the meanings and experiences of motherhood among Zimbabwean migrant women. This paper discusses the meanings and experiences of motherhood from the perspectives of Zimbabwean migrant women living in Melbourne, Australia.Methodsqualitative methods (in-depth interviewing, photo elicitation and drawing) were conducted with 15 Zimbabwean women who had children in Zimbabwe and in Australia. Data were analysed using thematic analysis method.FindingsZimbabwean women defined motherhood in varied ways. Common to all women was that becoming a mother had a significant meaning. Motherhood came with a sense of responsibility for children which resulted from their compromise and sacrifice. The dedication was exhibited by participants who demonstrated commitment to motherhood when striving to be a good mother. While motherhood provided pleasure and joy, some women found the role of motherhood burdensome in their new homeland. Due to cultural expectations of motherhood, women kept their difficulties silent for fear of being judged a ‘bad mother’. The unfamiliarity with the health and social care systems in Australia presented challenges to these women. Often, they were treated without respect and felt discriminated against.Conclusionsour findings reveal the paradox of motherhood. Although motherhood can be burdensome, there are positive changes brought about by the process of motherhood. Due to a lack of knowledge about the health and social care system and the negative experiences with health care in Australia, the women felt overwhelmed about becoming a mother in Australia.Implicationshealthcare providers, including midwives, need to understand how migrant women perceive and experience motherhood and their mothering role as this will help to improve the health and social care for these women and their children. Findings from this study provide a basis for further investigation into the formation and strengthening of support networks for Zimbabwean mothers in particular, and to other migrant women in general.     

‘Moving on’ Violence,wellbeing and questions about violence in antenatal care encounters. A qualitative study with Somali-born refugees in Sweden

BackgroundSomali-born women constitute one of the largest groups of childbearing refugee women in Sweden after more than two decades of political violence in Somalia. In Sweden, these women encounter antenatal care that includes routine questions about violence being asked. The aim of the study was to explore how Somali-born women understand and relate to violence and wellbeing during their migration transition and their views on being approached with questions about violence in Swedish antenatal care.MethodQualitative interviews (22) with Somali-born women (17) living in Sweden were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis.FindingsA balancing act between keeping private life private and the new welfare system was identified, where the midwife’s questions about violence were met with hesitance. The midwife was, however, considered a resource for access to support services in the new society. A focus on pragmatic strategies to move on in life, rather than dwelling on potential experiences of violence and related traumas, was prominent. Social networks, spiritual faith and motherhood were crucial for regaining coherence in the aftermath of war. Dialogue and mutual adjustments were identified as strategies used to overcome power tensions in intimate relationships undergoing transition.ConclusionsIf confidentiality and links between violence and health are explained and clarified during the care encounter, screening for violence can be more beneficial in relation to Somali-born women. The focus on “moving on” and rationality indicates strength and access to alternative resources, but needs to be balanced against risks for hidden needs in care encounters. A care environment with continuity of care and trustful relationships enhances possibilities for the midwife to balance these dual perspectives and identify potential needs. Collaborations between Somali communities, maternity care and social service providers can contribute with support to families in transition and bridge gaps to formal social and care services.     

Care providers’ views and experiences of postnatal care in private hospitals in Victoria,Australia

Objectivein Australia, as in other developed countries, women have consistently reported lower levels of satisfaction with postnatal care compared with antenatal and intrapartum care. However, in Victoria Australia, women who receive private hospital postnatal care have rated their care more favourably than women who received public hospital care. This study aimed to gain a further understanding of this by exploring care providers’ views and experiences of postnatal care in private hospitals.Designqualitative design using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.Settingprivate maternity hospitals in Victoria, Australia.Participantseleven health-care providers from three metropolitan and one regional private hospital including eight midwives (two maternity unit managers and six clinical midwives) and three obstetricians.Findingstwo global themes were identified: ‘Constrained Care’ and ‘Consumer Care’. ‘Constrained care’ demonstrates the complexity of the provision of postnatal care and encompasses midwives’ feelings of frustration with the provision of postnatal care in a busy environment complicated by staffing difficulties, a lack of continuity and the impact of key players in postnatal care (including visitors, management and obstetricians). ‘Consumer care’ describes care providers’ views that women often approach private postnatal care as a consumer, which can impact on their expectations and satisfaction with postnatal care. Despite these challenges, care providers, particularly midwives, highly valued (and generally enjoyed working in) postnatal care.Key conclusionsthis study, along with other Australian and international studies, has identified that hospital postnatal care is complex and characterised by multiple barriers which impact on the provision of quality postnatal care. Further research is needed to evaluate routine postnatal practices and continuity of care within the postnatal period. In-depth qualitative studies investigating women's expectations and experiences of postnatal care in both the public and private sector are also needed.     

The Effect of Language on Lesbian Nonbirth Mothers

ObjectiveTo explore how language affects the transition of social (nonbirth) mothers into motherhood.DesignNonexperimental, qualitative design.SettingThis study took place in large, urban city located on the East Coast. Interviews were conducted in a private location within the social mother's home or in a private room at a coffee shop.ParticipantsTwenty women who became social mothers through donor insemination with their female partners within the previous 24 months.MethodsIn depth, semistructured interviews lasting from 45 minutes to 90 minutes.ResultsThe transition to motherhood for social mothers is influenced by the use of language at the individual (social mother), family (mommy, mama, or something else), community (heterosexism of health care providers), and societal (education equals validation) levels. At present, a common language for or understanding of nonbirth mothers and their motherhood roles does not exist. Health care providers, including doctors, nurses, and office personnel working in maternal and child health settings, can help social mothers transition into motherhood by validating and recognizing their maternal roles through the use of written and spoken language.ConclusionBy understanding how language affects the transition of social mothers to motherhood and by addressing their needs, health care providers can deliver better support to social mothers and their families.     

Being safe practitioners and safe mothers: A critical ethnography of continuity of care midwifery in Australia

Objective

to examine how midwives and women within a continuity of care midwifery programme in Australia conceptualised childbirth risk and the influences of these conceptualisations on women's choices and midwives' practice.

Design and setting

a critical ethnography within a community-based continuity of midwifery care programme, including semi-structured interviews and the observation of sequential antenatal appointments.

Participants

eight midwives, an obstetrician and 17 women.

Findings

the midwives assumed a risk-negotiator role in order to mediate relationships between women and hospital-based maternity staff. The role of risk-negotiator relied profoundly on the trust engendered in their relationships with women. Trust within the mother–midwife relationship furthermore acted as a catalyst for complex processes of identity work which, in turn, allowed midwives to manipulate existing obstetric risk hierarchies and effectively re-order risk conceptualisations. In establishing and maintaining identities of ‘safe practitioner’ and ‘safe mother’, greater scope for the negotiation of normal within a context of obstetric risk was achieved.

Key conclusions and implications for practice

the effects of obstetric risk practices can be mitigated when trust within the mother–midwife relationship acts as a catalyst for identity work and supports the midwife's role as a risk-negotiator. The achievement of mutual identity-work through the midwives' role as risk-negotiator can contribute to improved outcomes for women receiving continuity of care. However, midwives needed to perform the role of risk-negotiator while simultaneously negotiating their professional credibility in a setting that construed their practice as risky.     

Developing and introducing a post birth care plan (PBCP): An action research project

ObjectiveThere is ongoing poor evaluation of post-birth care and an urgent need to improve women's satisfaction. To develop and evaluate an acceptable and useable post-birth care plan template through collaboration with women and community midwives.DesignQualitative methodology using an action research design. Setting and participants: North East Scotland. 10 pregnant women and 6 community midwives.FindingsSeven themes emerged from thematic analysis that informed the format of the PBCP template: being prepared for transitions, physical needs, psychosocial needs, cultural, religious and spiritual needs, organisation of care information, knowledge transfer, financial information and guidance.Key conclusionsWomen and midwives recognised the benefit of using a PBCP to ensure all information is covered and that care is individualised and organised according to cultural, social and physical needs, especially when there is fragmentation of services. The open conversational style of the PBCP provides opportunity to explore post-birth needs and how they develop over time.Implications for practicePBCPs provide an opportunity for women to explore their post-birth needs with their midwife, enabling them to have meaningful, respectful conversations with their midwives during the antenatal and post-birth period. This has the potential to increase women's satisfaction with their care and is particularly pertinent in regions where fragmentary systems of care are prevalent.     

Changing models of public antenatal care in Australia: Is current practice meeting the needs of vulnerable populations?

Objectiveto investigate women's views and experiences of public antenatal care.Designpopulation-based survey in two states.SettingSouth Australia and Victoria, Australia.Participants4366 women surveyed at 5–6 months post partum.Findingsof 8468 eligible women mailed the survey, 52% returned completed questionnaires. Fifty-seven per cent of women (2496/4339) received public antenatal care. Of these, half attended a GP for some/all antenatal visits, 38% attended a public hospital clinic or midwives clinic, and 12% had primary midwife care, mostly in a midwifery group practice. Women with complex needs – young women, those experiencing multiple social health problems, women of non-English speaking background, and women at higher risk of complications in pregnancy – were the least likely to say that care met their needs. Women attending a GP or midwife as a primary caregiver were the most positive about their antenatal care: 69% and 74% respectively describing their antenatal care as ‘very good’. Women attending a standard public hospital clinic were the least positive about their antenatal care with only 48% rating their care as ‘very good’. Women enroling in GP shared care or attending a midwives clinic at a public hospital gave intermediate ratings.Conclusion and implications for practiceModels of public antenatal care involving a designated lead primary caregiver (GP or midwife) came closest to meeting women's need for information, individualised care and support.     

Assessing mental health during pregnancy: An exploratory qualitative study of midwives’ perceptions

BackgroundMental health disorders are estimated to affect between 10% and 20% of women who access maternity services and can be defined as a public health issue due to the potential consequences for women, children and families. Detecting problems early in pregnancy can significantly improve outcomes for women and their families. However, mental health problems are not being consistently identified in routine midwifery practice and little is known from current literature about midwives’ practice in relation to current national guidelines or the impact models of care have on assessing maternal mental health.ObjectiveTo identify midwives’ views about barriers and facilitators to screening for mental health in pregnancy using current UK guidelines.DesignNine community midwives from a single district general hospital in the south of England were recruited to take part in focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to extract key themes from the data.FindingsThree key themes were identified from the focus groups and included system factors, social factors and trust. Barriers and facilitators to screening maternal mental health were associated with the initial ‘booking’ appointment’ and differences in models of care. Barriers to screening were defined as high workload, poor continuity, and a lack of trust between women and midwives.ConclusionsThis study highlights key barriers and facilitators associated with mental health screening during pregnancy, including issues of trust and uncertainty about women's willingness to disclose mental health conditions. Further research is required to evaluate the relationship between women and midwives in contemporary practice and the influence this may have on maternal mental health.     

The kaleidoscopic midwife: A conceptual metaphor illustrating first-time mothers' perspectives of a good midwife during childbirth. A grounded theory study

BackgroundThe literature review reveals general information about a good midwife from a range of perspectives and what childbearing women generally value in a midwife, but there is a lack of information around mothers’ perspectives of what makes a good midwife specifically during labour and birth, and even less in the context of different places of birth.AimTo conceptualise first-time mothers’ expectations and experiences of a good midwife during childbirth in the context of different birthplaces.DesignQualitative Straussian grounded theory methodology.SettingThree National Health Service Trusts in England providing maternity care that offered women the possibility of giving birth in different settings (home, freestanding midwifery unit and obstetric unit).ParticipantsFourteen first-time mothers in good general health with a straightforward singleton pregnancy anticipating a normal birth.MethodsEthical approval was gained. Data were collected through two semi-structured interviews for each participant (before and after birth). Data analysis included the processes of coding and conceptualising data, with constant comparison between data, literature and memos.FindingsThe model named ‘The kaleidoscopic midwife: a conceptual metaphor illustrating first-time mothers’ perspectives of a good midwife during childbirth’ was developed. The model is dynamic and woman-centred, and is operationalised as the midwife adapts to each woman's individual needs in the context of each specific labour. Four pillars of intrapartum care were identified for a good midwife in the labour continuum: promoting individuality; supporting embodied limbo; helping to go with the flow; providing information and guidance. The metaphor of a kaleidoscopic figure is used to describe a midwife who is ‘multi-coloured’ and ever changing in the light of the woman's individual needs, expectations and labour journey, in order to create an environment that enables her to move forward despite the uncertainty and the expectations-experiences gap. The following elements are harmonised by the kaleidoscopic midwife: relationship-mediated being; knowledgeable doing; physical presence; immediately available presence.ConclusionThe model presented has relevance to contemporary debates about quality of care and place of birth and can be used by midwives to pursue excellence in caring for labouring mothers. Independently from the place of birth, when the woman is cared for by a midwife demonstrating the above characteristics, she is likely to have an optimum experience of birth. Future research is necessary to tease out individual components of the model in a variety of practice settings.     

Addressing transition to motherhood,guideline adherence by midwives in prenatal booking visits: Findings from video recordings

ObjectiveTo assess if and how primary care midwives adhere to the guideline by addressing transition to motherhood at the first prenatal booking visit and to what extent there was a difference in addressing transition to motherhood between nulliparous and multiparous women.DesignCross-sectional observational study of video-recorded prenatal booking visits.Setting and participants126 video recordings of prenatal booking visits with 18 primary care midwives in the Netherlands taking place between August 2010 and April 2011.MeasurementsFive observers assessed dichotomously if midwives addressed seven topics of transition to motherhood according to the Dutch guideline prenatal midwifery care from the Royal Dutch Organization of Midwives and used six communication techniques. Frequencies and percentages of addressing each topic and communication technique were calculated. Differences between nulliparous and multiparous women were examined with Chi-Square tests or Fischer Exact tests, were appropriate. The agreement between the five observers was quantified using Fleiss' Kappa.FindingsDuring all visits at least one of the seven topics of transition to motherhood was addressed. The topics mother-to-infant bonding and support were addressed respectively in 2% and 16% of the visits. In almost all visits the topics desirability of the pregnancy, experience with the ultrasound examination or abdominal palpation or hearing the foetal heartbeat and practical preparation were addressed. Open questions for addressing transition to motherhood were used in 6% of the prenatal booking visits. Dutch midwives addressed transition to motherhood mostly by giving information (100%) and by using closed-ended questions (94%) and following woman's initiative (90%). Nulliparous women brought up transition to motherhood on their own initiative more often than multiparous women (97% versus 84%). For the topics ‘desirability of the pregnancy ‘and’ practical preparations’ and for conversation techniques ‘giving information’ and ‘closed-ended questions’, 100% agreement was achieved. However, the topic ‘Support’ had poor agreement (kappa = 0.19).Key conclusions and implications for practiceAlthough during every visit the transition of motherhood was addressed, the topics mother-to-infant bonding and support should get more attention. Midwives should improve adherence to the guideline by addressing transition to motherhood and by using more open questions. Furthermore, they should focus on taking the initiative to address the transition to motherhood in multiparous women themselves.