Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women

IntroductionFew data have been reported on robot-assisted surgery in elderly. The objectives were to compare feasibility, complication data, and survival of patients under and upper the age of 70 who are managed for endometrial cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective comparative single-center study including patients treated between January 2007 and December 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: less than 70 years and greater than or equal to 70 years. The primary endpoint was the rate of complications. The secondary endpoints were conversion rate and follow-up.Results148 patients were included: 86 under 70 (group A) and 62 aged 70 and over (group B). More adhesiolysis was performed in group B (p < .01); the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection rates were not different between both groups (p = .2 and p = .9). The operating times were significantly longer in group B (220.1 vs. 234.4 min, p = .02). The conversion rate was similar between the 2 groups (p = .7). The tumors were endometrioid adenocarcinomas for 77.9 and 66.7% respectively (p = .2), with grade 3 tumors more represented in older patients (24.4% vs. 48.4%, p < .01). There were more tumors at high risk of recurrence after 70 years (33.7 vs. 45.2%, p = .04). No significant difference was found for postoperative complications. There was no difference in overall survival (p = .7) or progression-free survival (p = .2). Undertreated women rate was similar in both groups (p = .1).ConclusionRobotic surgery appears feasible and reproducible and could bring a benefit and allow optimal surgery without increasing the morbidity in the management of endometrial cancers whatever the age is.     

Outcomes of older adults aged 90 and over with cutaneous malignancies after electrochemotherapy with bleomycin: A matched cohort analysis from the InspECT registry

BackgroundWith extending life expectancy, more people are diagnosed with cutaneous malignancies at advanced ages and are offered nonsurgical treatment. We assessed outcomes of the oldest-old adults after electrochemotherapy (ECT).MethodsThe International Network for Sharing Practices of ECT (InspECT) registry was queried for adults aged ≥90 years (ys) with skin cancers/cutaneous metastases of any histotype who underwent bleomycin-ECT (2006–2019). These were subanalysed with patients aged <90 ys after matching 1:2 for tumor location, number, size, histotype, and previous treatments. We assessed ECT modalities, toxicity (CTCAE), response (RECIST), and patient perception (EQ-5D).ResultsSixty-one patients represented the study cohort (median 92 ys, range 92–104), 122 the control group (median 77 ys, range 23–89). Among the oldest-old, 44 patients (72%) had primary/recurrent skin cancers, 17 (28%) cutaneous metastases. Median tumour size was 15 mm (range, 5–450). The oldest-old adults underwent ECT mainly under local/regional anaesthesia (59% vs 39% p = .012). We observed no differences regarding dose and route of chemotherapy (intravenous vs intratumoral, p = .308), electrode geometry (linear vs hexagonal, p = .172) and procedural duration (18 vs 21 min, p = .378). Complete response (57.4 [95%-CI 44.1%–70.0%] vs 64.7% [95%-CI 55.6%–73.2%], p = .222) and 1-year local control (76.7% vs 81.7, p = .092) rates were comparable. Pain and skin hyperpigmentation were mild in both groups. Skin ulceration persisted longer in the oldest-old patients (4.4 vs 2.4 months, p = .008).ConclusionsThe oldest-old adults with cutaneous malignancies undergo ECT most commonly under local/regional anaesthesia with safety profiles and clinical effectiveness similar to their younger counterparts, except in case of ulcerated tumors.     

Exercise capacity in the stair-climbing test predicts outcomes of operable esophageal cancer in minimally invasive era

IntroductionThe risk of complications after esophagectomy highlights the need for careful preoperative assessment. Aim was to assess whether stair-climbing test (SCT) could predict outcomes of patients with operable esophageal cancer in minimally invasive era.Materials and methodsPatients with esophageal cancer were evaluated for surgical treatment in Central Finland Central Hospital from 2012 to March 2021. Of evaluated 162 patients, 138 were scheduled to eventually undergo surgery. The exercise capacity was evaluated with symptom limited SCT. Patients were divided into four study groups on intent-to-treat basis: surgery and the SCT >14 m (Group 1), surgery and the SCT <11 m (Group 2), non-surgical therapy and the SCT <11 m (Group 3) and non-surgical therapy and the SCT >14 m (Group 4). Results were adjusted for confounders.ResultsMajor complication rate was 10.1% vs 40.0% between Group 1 and 2 (p = 0.006), and 90-day mortality 0% vs 20.0% (p < 0.001). Overall survival rates in Groups 1–4 at 1-year were 92.3% vs 72.2% vs 46.8% vs 81.8%, at 3-year 68.5% vs 52.7% vs 15.6% vs 27.3% and at 5-year 58.7% vs 39.5% vs 0% vs 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis when compared to Group 1, other groups had increased 5-year mortality hazard (Group 2 HR 2.88 (95% CI 1.25–6.63), Group 3 HR 15.6 (95% CI 5.57–43.5) and Group 4 HR 5.35 (95% CI 2.08–13.7)).ConclusionExercise capacity measured with SCT in esophageal cancer patients is a strong predictor of complications and survival, and is a potential parameter to be included in any risk or prognostic models.     

Perceptions of medical status and treatment goal among older adults with advanced cancer

BackgroundPatient-reported medical status and treatment goal are measures of prognostic understanding with demonstrated relationships to important clinical and patient-reported outcomes in the general cancer population. Among older adults, relationships between these measures and other patient-reported (quality of life [QOL], symptoms, functional impairment) and clinical (hospitalization risk, survival) outcomes remains unclear.MethodsWe enrolled patients ≥70 with advanced gastrointestinal cancers, collecting patient-reported medical status (terminally ill vs not), treatment goal (curative vs non-curative), QOL (EORTC-Elderly Cancer Patients), symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]), and functional impairment (activities of daily living [ADLs]). We also obtained information about hospitalizations and survival. To explore relationships between patient-reported medical status, treatment goal, QOL, symptoms, functional impairment, hospitalizations, and survival, we used regression models adjusted for age, sex, and education.ResultsOf 103 patients, 49.5% reported terminally ill status and 64.0% a non-curative treatment goal. Terminally ill status was associated with worse QOL (EORTC illness burden: 53.59 vs 35.26, p = 0.001), higher symptom burden (ESAS: 28.15 vs 16.79, p = 0.002), more functional impairment (ADLs: 3.63 vs 5.24, p = 0.006), greater hospitalization risk (HR = 2.41, p = 0.020), and worse survival (HR = 1.93, p = 0.010). We did not find associations between patient-reported treatment goal and these outcomes.ConclusionsIn older adults with advanced cancer, report of terminally ill status was associated with other important patient-reported and clinical outcomes, suggesting disease severity may inform illness perceptions. We did not find similar associations for patient-reported treatment goal, indicating that questions related to medical status and treatment goal measure different constructs and more nuanced measures are needed.     

The association of age with acute toxicities in NRG oncology combined modality lower GI cancer trials

PurposeExpected toxicity from chemoradiation (CRT) is an important factor in treatment decisions but is poorly understood in older adults with lower gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Our objective was to compare acute adverse events (AAEs) of older and younger adults with lower GI malignancies treated on NRG studies.MethodsData from 6 NRG trials, testing combined modality therapy in patients with anal or rectal cancer, were used to test the hypothesis that older age was associated with increased AAEs. AAEs and compliance with protocol-directed therapy were compared between patients aged ≥70 and < 70. Categorical variables were compared across age groups using the chi-square test. The association of age on AAEs was evaluated using a covariate-adjusted logistic regression model, with odds ratio (OR) reported. To adjust for multiple comparisons, a p-value <0.01 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThere were 2525 patients, including 380 patients ≥70 years old (15%) evaluable. Older patients were more likely to have worse baseline performance status (PS 1 or 2) (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.001), but otherwise baseline characteristics were similar. Older patients were less likely to complete their chemotherapy (78% vs. 87%, p < 0.001), but had similar RT duration. On univariate analysis, older patients were more likely to experience grade ≥ 3 GI AAEs (36% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and less likely to experience grade ≥ 3 skin AAEs (8% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, older age was associated with grade ≥ 3 GI AAE (OR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.52, 2.47, p < 0.001) after adjusting for sex, race, PS, and disease site.ConclusionsOlder patients with lower GI cancers who underwent CRT were less likely to complete chemotherapy and had higher rates of grade 3+ GI AAEs. These results can be used to counsel older adults prior to treatment and manage expected toxicities throughout pelvic CRT.     

Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA)

BackgroundAdvanced age is associated with worse outcomes after open rectal cancer surgery. However, not much is known about outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of MIS in elderly rectal cancer patients using the Bi-national Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) data from Australia and New Zealand (ANZ).Methods3451 patients were included, divided into three groups: <50 years (n = 364), 50–74 years (n = 2157) and ≥75 years (n = 930). Propensity-score matching was performed for the elderly group analysis to correct for differences in baseline characteristics.ResultsMIS was performed in 52.9% of elderly patients, slightly lower than rates in <50 year and 50–74 year old groups (61% and 55.5%, respectively, p = 0.022). Elderly patients had more postoperative complications (p < 0.0001) and had a longer length of hospital stay (LOS; median 11 vs. 8 days for both other groups; p < 0.0001). Elderly patients had higher (y)pT-stages compared to both other groups (p < 0.0001) and were less likely to receive adjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). Propensity-score matched analysis of the elderly group showed a higher rate of superficial wound dehiscence and a longer LOS after open surgery compared to MIS (10.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.030; 12 days vs. 9.5 days, p = 0.001, respectively), with comparable short-term oncological outcomes.ConclusionsMIS is performed in just over half of elderly rectal cancer patients who are selected for elective rectal resection surgery in ANZ. When performed in the elderly, MIS appears safe and is associated with fewer wound complications and a shorter LOS.     

Predicting the rate of adjuvant postoperative chemo/radiation in cervical cancer with tumor size ≥2 cm and <4 cm: An Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group study

ObjectiveWomen with cervical cancer who undergo radical hysterectomy are often treated postoperatively with chemoradiation. Patient selection that minimizes adjuvant treatment is valuable. We compared two methods for predicting postoperative adjuvant treatment of women with tumor size ≥2 cm and <4 cm.Study designThis multicenter retrospective study included 272 women with tumor size ≥2 cm and <4 cm. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal tumor cutoff size to predict adjuvant treatment. A second analysis compared the rate of adjuvant treatment between women with and without lymph vascular space involvement (LVSI).ResultsAccording to the ROC, the optimal cutoff value of tumor size for predicting adjuvant treatment was 2.95 cm (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.67). Tumors were ≥3.0 cm in 166 (61.0%) women. The rate of adjuvant treatment was higher in women with larger tumor diameter (73.8% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.0001). Of the 241 women with a LVSI record, LVSI was present in 81 (34%) women. Among women with LVSI, rates were higher of positive lymph nodes (41.0% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001) and postoperative adjuvant treatment (83.3% vs. 53.7%, p < 0.001). Among women with tumor size ≥3.0 cm and LVSI, the rate of adjuvant treatment was 90.0%. In the multivariate analysis, both tumor size ≥3.0 cm and the presence of LVSI were independently associated with adjuvant treatment (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.1–7.1; p < 0.0001 and OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.4–10.0; p < 0.0001, respectively).ConclusionIn women with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy, tumors ≥3 cm were associated with a >70% rate of adjuvant treatment, and LVSI was associated with a >80% rate. These data should be weighed in multidisciplinary consultation with radiation oncologists when deciding treatment strategy.     

The impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis on postoperative outcomes and 5-year survival in curatively operated colorectal cancer patients – A retrospective register study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether sarcopenia or myosteatosis have an impact on short- and long-term results in patients who were surgically treated for colorectal cancer.MethodsDuring 2007–2011 curatively treated colorectal cancer patients (n = 348) were included in the study. Clinical data was collected retrospectively from patient registers. Skeletal muscle mass was measured at the L3 level via venous-phase computed tomography and patients were divided into sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic and into myosteatotic and non-myosteatotic. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were analysed in these groups.ResultsSarcopenia was found in 208 patients (59.8%) and myosteatosis was found in 108 patients (31.2%). Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of postoperative pneumonia (6.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.021). Sarcopenic colon cancer patients had higher rate of cardiorespiratory complications than non-sarcopenic (6.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.023) and sarcopenic rectum cancer patients had more often pneumonia than non-sarcopenic (8.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.041). Discharge to home was less common in myosteatotic patients than in non-myosteatotic patients (47.7% vs. 76.9%, p < 0.001) and also in sarcopenic patients than in non-sarcopenic patients (62.7% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.013). Myosteatotic patients had decreased overall survival according to a Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.002) and in the multivariable-adjusted Cox model (HR = 1.6, p = 0.034).ConclusionsSarcopenia increases the pneumonia and cardiorespiratory complication rates. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis predicts the need for institutional care after colorectal cancer surgery. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis seem to be negative factors for colorectal cancer patients’ survival. Myosteatosis is an independent risk factor for poor overall 5-year survival.     

Simultaneous approach for patients with synchronous colon and rectal liver metastases: Impact of site of primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes

Background and aimsWe aimed to investigate the impact of the site of the primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes in patients undergone simultaneous approach for colon (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) with synchronous liver metastases (SCRLM).Patients and methodsOf the 220 patients with SCRLM operated on between Mar 2006 and Dec 2017, 169 patients (76.8%) were treated by a simultaneous approach and were included in the study. Two groups were considered according to the location of primary tumor RC-Group (n = 47) and CC-group (n = 122).ResultsMultiple liver metastases were observed in 70.2% in RC-Group and 77.0% in CC-Group (p = 0.233), whilst median Tumor Burden Score (TBS) was 4.7 in RC-Group and 5.4 CC-Group (p = 0.276). Severe morbidity (p = 0.315) and mortality at 90 days (p = 0.520) were comparable between RC-Group and CC-Group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was similar comparing RC-Group and CC-Group (48.2% vs. 45.3%; p = 0.709), but it was significantly different when considering left-CC, right-CC and RC separately (54.5% vs. 35.2% vs. 48.2%; p = 0.041). Primary tumor location (right-CC, p = 0.001; RC, p = 0.002), microscopic residual (R1) disease at the primary (p < 0.001), TBS ≥6 (p = 0.012), bilobar metastases (p = 0.004), and chemotherapy strategy (preoperative ChT, p = 0.253; postoperative ChT, p = 0.012; and perioperative ChT, p < 0.001) resulted to be independent prognostic factors at multivariable analysis.ConclusionIn patients with SCRLM, simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases seems feasible and safe and allows satisfactory oncological outcomes both in CC and RC. Right-CC shows a worse prognosis when compared to left-CC and RC.     

Real-world implementation of a geriatric-specific ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colonic cancer surgery

BackgroundThe aim of this single-center observational study was to evaluate the impact of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, combined with systematic geriatric assessment and support, on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients aged 70 or older undergoing colonic cancer surgery.MethodsTwo groups were formed from an actively maintained database from all patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic surgery for neoplasms during a defined period before (standard group) or after (ERAS group) the introduction of an ERAS program associated with systematic geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was postoperative 90-day morbidity. Secondary outcomes were total length of hospital stay, initiated and completed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) rate, and 1-year mortality rate.ResultsA total of 266 patients (135 standard and 131 ERAS) were included in the study. Overall 90-day morbidity and mean hospital stay were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group (22.1% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.02; and 6.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.01, respectively). There were no differences in readmission rates and anastomotic complications. AC was recommended in 114 patients. The rate of initiated treatment was comparable between the groups (66.6% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.69). The rate of completed AC was significantly higher in the ERAS group (50% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) with a lower toxicity rate (57.1% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.002). The 1-year mortality rate was higher in the standard group (7.4% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe combination of ERAS protocols and geriatric assessment and support reduces the overall morbidity rate and improves 12-month oncologic outcomes.     

R1 pancreatic cancer patients benefit from chemoradiation when initiation of adjuvant therapy is delayed

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreas cancer (PDAC) has been demonstrated to improve survival. However, the optimal adjuvant treatment (AT) regimen for R1-margin patients remains unclear. This retrospective study investigates the impact of AC vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) on survival (OS).Material and methodsThe NCDB was queried for patients with PDAC who underwent PD between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into, (A) AC<60 days, (B) ACRT<60 days, (C) AC≥60 days, and (D) ACRT≥60 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed.ResultsAmong 13 740 patients, median OS was 23.7 months. For R1 patients, median OS for timely AC and ACRT, and delayed AC and ACRT was 19.91, 19.19, 15.24, 18.96 months, respectively. While time of AC initiation was an insignificant factor for R0 patients (p = 0.263, CI 0.957–1.173), a survival benefit was found for R1 patients who received AC<60 vs. ≥60 days (p = 0.041, CI 1.002–1.42). Among R1 patients, administration of delayed ACRT achieves the same survival benefit of timely AC initiation (p = 0.074, CI 0.703–1.077).ConclusionThe study suggests value in ACRT for patients with R1 margins when delay of AT≥60 days cannot be avoided. Hence, ACRT may mitigate the negative impact of delayed AT initiation for R1-patients.     

Multidisciplinary management of anal intraepithelial neoplasia and rate of progression to cancer: A retrospective cohort study

PurposeTo describe the regional burden of AIN and rate of progression to cancer in patients managed in specialist and non-specialist clinic settings.MethodsPatients with a histopathological diagnosis of AIN between 1994 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathological characteristics including high-risk status (chronic immunosuppressant use or HIV positive), number and type of biopsy (punch/excision) and histopathological findings were recorded. The relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and progression to cancer was assessed using logistic regression.ResultsOf 250 patients identified, 207 were eligible for inclusion: 144 from the specialist and 63 from the non-specialist clinic. Patients in the specialist clinic were younger (<40 years 31% vs 19%, p = 0.007), more likely to be male (34% vs 16%, p = 0.008) and HIV positive (15% vs 2%, p = 0.012). Patients in the non-specialist clinic were less likely to have AIN3 on initial pathology (68% vs 79%, p = 0.074) and were more often followed up for less than 36 months (46% vs 28%, p = 0.134). The rate of progression to cancer was 17% in the whole cohort (20% vs 10%, p = 0.061). On multivariate analysis, increasing age (OR 3.02, 95%CI 1.58–5.78, p < 0.001), high risk status (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.43–8.74, p = 0.006) and increasing number of excisions (OR 4.88, 95%CI 2.15–11.07, p < 0.001) were related to progression to cancer.ConclusionThe specialist clinic provides a structured approach to the follow up of high-risk status patients with AIN. Frequent monitoring with specialist assessments including high resolution anoscopy in a higher volume clinic are required due to the increased risk of progression to anal cancer.     

Benchmarking Outcomes for Definitive Treatment of Young-Onset,Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

PurposeThere has been an increase in the incidence of rectal cancer diagnosed in young adults (age < 50 years). We evaluated outcomes among young adults treated with pre-operative long course chemoradiation (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME).MethodsThe medical records of 219 patients, age 18-49, with non-metastatic, cT3-4, or cN1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma treated from 2000 to 2017 were reviewed for demographic and treatment characteristics, as well as pathologic and oncologic outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier test, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate survival outcomes.ResultsThe median age at diagnosis was 44 years. CRT followed by TME and post-operative chemotherapy was the most frequent treatment sequence (n = 196), with FOLFOX (n = 115) as the predominant adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no difference in sex, stage, MSS/pMMR, or pCR by age (< 45 years [n = 111] vs. ≥ 45 years [n = 108]). The 5-year rates of DFS were 77.2% for all patients, 69.8% for age < 45 years and 84.7% for age ≥ 45 years (P = .01). The 5-year rates of OS were 89.6% for all patients, 85.1% for patients with age < 45 years and 94.3% for patients with age ≥ 45 years (P = .03). Age ≥ 45 years was associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence or death on multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97, P = .04).ConclusionAmong young adults, patients with age < 45 years had lower rates of DFS and OS, compared to those with age ≥ 45 years. These outcomes could serve as a benchmark by which to evaluate newer treatment approaches.     

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after previous trans-urethral resection of the prostate: Assessment of functional and oncological outcomes

Backgroundno data exist concerning functional and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP), in patients previously treated with trans-urethral resection of the prostate (p-TURP), for benign prostate obstruction. Our study addressed the impact of p-TURP on immediate and 12-months urinary continence recovery (UCR), as well as peri-operative outcomes and surgical margins, after RS-RARP.Methodsall patients treated with RS-RARP for prostate cancer at a single high-volume European institution, between 2010 and 2021, were identified and stratified according to p-TURP status. Logistic, Poisson and Cox regression models were performed.ResultsOf 1386 RS-RARP patients, 99 (7%) had history of p-TURP. Between p-TURP and no-TURP patients no differences were detected regarding both intra- and post-operative complications (p values = 0.9). The rates of immediate UCR were 40 vs 67% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At 12 months from RS-RARP, the rates of UCR were 68 vs 94% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p < 0.001). At multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, p-TURP was independently associated, respectively, with lower immediate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, p < 0.001) and 12-months UCR (hazard ratio: 0.54, p < 0.001). At multivariable Poisson analyses, p-TURP predicted longer operative time (rate ratio: 1.08, p < 0.001) but not longer length of stay or time to catheter removal (p values > 0.05). Positive surgical margins rates were 23 vs 17% in p-TURP vs no-TURP patients (p = 0.1), which translated in a non-statistically significant multivariable OR of 1.14 (p = 0.6).Conclusionsp-TURP does not increase surgical morbidity but portends longer operative time and worse urinary continence after RS-RARP.     

Clinical outcome of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone,or gemcitabine alone: Subgroup analysis of a randomised phase III trial,GEST study.

BackgroundIn the GEST study of unresectable pancreatic cancer, S-1 demonstrated non-inferiority compared to gemcitabine, but gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) did not show superiority over gemcitabine for overall survival (OS). We performed subgroup analysis of these data focused on the efficacy and safety of these regimens as a first-line treatment for elderly patients.MethodsElderly patients (≥70 years, n = 261) treated for unresectable pancreatic cancer (GS: n = 90, S-1: n = 85 and gemcitabine: n = 86) were analysed.ResultsNo significant differences between the GS, S-1, or gemcitabine groups in OS (median: 10.2, 8.0 and 8.5 months, respectively) or objective response rates (27.6%, 25.3% and 14.3%, respectively) were noted. Grade ≥III adverse haematological events were observed more frequently in GS-treated than in S-1- or gemcitabine-treated elderly patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). Four of 8 patients aged ≥80 years experienced serious adverse events.ConclusionsS-1 and gemcitabine are both efficacious options for treatment of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Conversely, first-line treatment of elderly patients with GS should only be used after careful consideration.     

Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopic-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer – A propensity score-matching analysis

BackgroundTo investigate the incidence and prognosis of intra-abdominal infectious complications (IaICs) after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and open radical gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer.MethodsThe data of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy (LAG and OG) for gastric cancer at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2000 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. The incidence and prognosis of postoperative IaICs in the two groups were analyzed.ResultsAfter PSM, no significant difference was found in the baseline data between OG (n = 913) and LAG (n = 913). The incidence of IaICs after OG and LAG was 4.1% and 5.1%, respectively (p = 0.264). The Cox multivariate analysis showed that IaICs were an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing gastrectomy (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.65, p < 0.001). Further, LAG was an independent protective factor for OS among the patients with IaICs (HR: 0.54, p = 0.036), while tumor diameter of ≥50 mm (p = 0.01) and pathological TNM stage III (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors. The 5-year OS rate was higher in the patients with IaICs who underwent LAG than in those who underwent OG (51.1% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.042). The prognostic nutritional index was similar in both groups before surgery (p = 0.220) but lower on the first, third, and fifth days after OG than after LAG (p < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared to OG, LAG can improve the prognosis of patients with postoperative IaICs and is therefore recommended for patients at a high risk for IaICs.     

Synovial sarcoma: Do children do better?

ObjectivesSynovial sarcoma, a distinct subtype of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), is typically found in young patients. Long history of symptoms and heterogeneous clinical presentation sometimes delays diagnosis. Children have been reported to have a better prognosis than adults in some series.The main emphasis of this study was to determine differences between children and adults and to investigate prognostic factors regarding cancer specific survival (CSS).Methods248 patients treated between 1982 and 2014 at one department were included. Mean age was 37.0 years, including 43 patients <16 years. Demographic, pathology- and treatment-related information was ascertained. Median follow-up was 5.2 years.ResultsMedian duration of symptoms was 11.5 months in children and 12 months in adults (p = 0.238). Patients with a prior unplanned excision had a significantly longer duration of symptoms (p = 0.001). No difference was present between children and adults regarding tumour size, site, grade and superficial/deep location. Treatment was with surgical excision and (usually) adjuvant radiotherapy but five patients received preoperative radiotherapy and 43 patients chemotherapy. In patients treated with curative intent, five-year CSS rates were 75.5% for adults and 89.0% for children, with 10-year CSS rates of 56.1% and 82.2% (p = 0.026).In multivariate analysis, large tumour size (p < 0.005) and patient age (p = 0.024) were associated with worse CSS, irrespective of tumour location and site.ConclusionClinical presentation of synovial sarcoma is similar in children and adults, with no significant difference in tumour size, site, grade or location. Small tumour size and young patient age are independent positive prognostic factors influencing CSS.     

Uni-vs. bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction – A multicenter outcome analysis

ObjectiveOver the past decade numbers of bilateral mastectomy have increased steadily. As a result, bilateral breast reconstruction is gaining popularity. The presented study compares complications and outcomes of unilateral and bilateral DIEP free-flap breast reconstructions using the largest database available in Europe.MethodsFemale breast cancer patients (n = 3926) receiving DIEP flap breast reconstructions (n = 4577 free flaps) at 22 different centers were included in this study. Free flaps were stratified into two groups: a unilateral- (UL) and a bilateral- (BL) breast reconstruction group. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free flap outcome.ResultsMean operative time was significantly longer in the BL group (UL: 285.2 ± 107.7 vs. BL: 399.1 ± 136.8 min; p < 0.001). Mean ischemia time was comparable between groups (p = 0.741). There was no significant difference with regard to total (UL 1.8% vs. BL 2.6%, p = 0.081) or partial flap loss (UL 1.2% vs. BL 0.9%, p = 0.45) between both groups. Rates of venous or arterial thrombosis were comparable between both groups (venous: UL 2.9% vs. BL 2.2%, p = 0.189; arterial: UL 1.8% vs. BL 1.2%, p = 0.182). However, significantly higher rates of hematoma at the donor and recipient site were observed in the UL group (donor site: UL 1.1% vs. BL 0.1%, p = 0.001; recipient site UL 3.9% vs. BL 1.7%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe data underline the feasibility of bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction, when performed in a setting of specialized centers.     

Clinical presentation and prognosis of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas – Matched-pair analysis with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

IntroductionAdenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a rare subtype of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of ASCP in comparison to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Materials and methodsAll patients with ASCP treated between December 2001 and December 2017 were identified from a prospective database. Clinicopathological and follow-up data were analyzed. A nested case-control-study with matched-pair analysis was performed to compare overall survival of ASCP and PDAC.ResultsOf 4009 patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma 91 patients had ASCP. Compared to PDAC ASCP were larger (4.0 vs. 3.2 cm; p < 0.0001), more frequently involved lymph nodes (88% vs. 78%; p = 0.0216), more frequently showed poor differentiation (G3: 79% vs. 36%; p < 0.0001) and more frequently were located in the pancreatic tail (19% vs. 10%; p = 0.0179). Overall median post-resection-survival was shorter in ASCP (10.8 vs. 20.5 months in PDAC; p = 0.0085), but 5-year survival rates were comparable (18.2% vs. 17.5%). After matching for the unevenly distributed prognostic factors survival after resection of ASCP and PDAC was comparable (p = 0.8301). Localization in the head or several parts of the pancreas, high CA 19-9 levels, and M1 disease were independent predictors of survival in patients with ASCP.ConclusionASCP is more aggressive with poorer differentiation and higher rates of lymph node metastases compared to PDAC. In spite of a shorter median survival, 5-year survival rates after surgical resection of about 18% can be expected in ASCP and support resection as part of a multimodal therapy as the treatment of choice in this rare cancer.     

A large multicenter propensity match study of sentinel lymph node biopsy feasibility in endometrioid variants of endometrial cancer

IntroductionSentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy algorithm has been routinely applied in all endometrial endometrioid tumors, however, no studies analyzed the feasibility of SLN mapping in endometrioid variants (EV), which included villoglandular, secretory, ciliated cell, mucinous, and squamous differentiation. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of SLN biopsy in EV of EC.Materials and methodsAll patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical treatment for early-stage EC were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 study groups: Group 1 which included patients with EV, and Group 2 which included patients with typical endometrioid histology. A propensity match analysis was performed according to age (≥65 years vs. no), BMI (≥30 kg/m² vs. no), and LVSI (present vs. absent).ResultsAfter a 1:5 propensity-matched analysis, a total of 458 patients were identified (Group 1 n = 77, Group 2 n = 381). Overall detection rate was not statistically significant between the EV and the typical endometrioid group (94.8% vs. 92.4%, p = 0.319). Furthermore, neither bilateral nor unilateral detection rate was different between the two groups (70.1% vs. 74.8%, p = 0.267, and 23.4% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.120). BMI ≥30 kg/m² was the only factor influencing SLN failure (p = 0.013). SLN technique showed excellent sensitivity in both the EV (100% sensitivity, p < 0.001) and the typical endometrioid unit (93.8% sensitivity, p < 0.001).ConclusionSLN research/detection for EV of endometrial cancer is a feasible and highly sensitive technique. Obesity was confirmed to be a risk factor for SLN failure.