Oncological outcome of carcinomas in the rectosigmoid junction compared to the upper rectum or sigmoid colon – A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionAlthough carcinomas of the rectosigmoid junction are frequent, specific data on these tumors are sparse because assignment either to the colon or rectum is common. The objective of this study is to determine whether carcinomas of the rectosigmoid junction can be assigned to the sigmoid colon or to the upper rectum in terms of tumor characteristics and oncological outcome.Materials and methods337 consecutive patients undergoing resection of carcinomas in the sigmoid colon, the rectosigmoid junction and the upper third of the rectum were analyzed retrospectively and additionally followed-up for oncological outcome.Results185 patients (54.9%) showed carcinoma in the sigmoid colon, 41 (12.2%) in the rectosigmoid junction and 111 (32.9%) in the upper rectum. Synchronous liver metastases (rectosigmoid junction 31.7%, sigmoid colon 16.2%, upper rectum 11.7%; P = 0.01), lymphovascular invasion (rectosigmoid junction 46.3%, sigmoid colon 25.4%, upper rectum 32.4%; P = 0.03) and pN2 (rectosigmoid junction 31.7%, sigmoid colon 10.3%, upper rectum 13.5%; P = 0.002) were more common in carcinomas of the rectosigmoid junction. The median follow-up period was 44 (22–75.5) months. Five-year overall survival was 44.6% in patients with carcinomas in the rectosigmoid junction, 70.9% in the sigmoid colon, and 70.2% in the upper rectum.ConclusionCarcinomas of the rectosigmoid junction reveal a deviant behavioral pattern compared to its adjacent bowel segments.     

Indications for neoadjuvant treatment based on risk factors for poor prognosis before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

IntroductionThe oncological benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC for decision making regarding additional treatment in patients with LARC.Materials and methodsWe examined a total of 96 patients with MRI-defined poor-risk locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer treated by NAC alone between 2006 and 2018. Survival outcomes and clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC were analyzed.ResultsIn the median follow-up duration after surgery of 60 months (3–120), the rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and local recurrence (LR) were 83.6%, 78.4%, and 8.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, patients with cT4 disease had a significantly higher risk of poor OS (HR; 6.10, 95% CI; 1.32–28.15, P = 0.021) than those with cT3 disease. After NAC, ycN+ was significantly associated with a higher risk of poor OS (HR; 5.92, 95% CI; 1.27–27.62, P = 0.024) and RFS (HR; 2.55, 95% CI; 1.01–6.48, P = 0.048) than ycN-. In addition, patients with CEA after NAC (post-CEA) ≥ 5 ng/ml had a significantly higher risk LR (HR; 5.63, 95% CI; 1.06–29.93, P = 0.043).ConclusionNAC alone had an insufficient survival effect on patients with cT4 disease, ycN+, or an elevated post-CEA level. In contrast, NAC alone is a potential treatment for other patients with LARC.     

Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies

AimsTo evaluate comparative outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) versus conventional breast conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer treatment.MethodsA systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted, and all eligible studies comparing OBCS and BCS were included. Characteristics of the tumour includes preoperative size of tumour on imaging and the weight of the specimen after resection. While positive margins rate, re-excision rate, completion mastectomy rate and loco-regional recurrence were considered as oncological outcome parameters. Post-operative complications include surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, haematoma and skin/nipple necrosis.ResultsThirty-one studies reporting a total number of 115011 patients who underwent OBCS (n = 11978) or BCS (n = 103033) were included. OBCS group showed lower risk of positive margins rate [OR 0.76, P = 0.05], re-excision rate [OR 0.72, P = 0.02], and loco-regional recurrence [OR 0.62, P = 0.03] compared to BCS group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding post-operative complications.ConclusionAlthough there is a lack of level 1 evidence, the available studies clearly demonstrate superior or at least equivalent outcomes when comparing OBCS with conventional BCS. The benefits of OBCS include dealing with larger tumours, wider surgical margins and better aesthetic results for patients.     

Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm

ObjectiveTo compare the oncological outcomes and major complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) with a tumour size less than 2 cm.MethodsWe retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes and major complications of 1207 stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with a tumour size less than 2 cm who received LRH (n = 546) or ARH (n = 661) in 37 hospitals.Results(1) There was no significant difference in 3-year overall survival (OS; 97.3% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.288) or 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; 95.1% vs. 95.4%, P = 0.792) between LRH (n = 546) and ARH (n = 661).(2) The rate of any 1 complication refers to the incidence of one or more complications in a patient, which was higher with LRH than ARH (OR = 4.047, 95% CI = 2.035–8.048, P < 0.001). Additionally, intraoperative complications occurred with LRH (OR = 12.313, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.571–96.493, P = 0.017), and postoperative complications (OR = 3.652, 95% CI = 1.763–7.562, P < 0.001) were higher with LRH than ARH. The ureteral injury rate was higher with LRH than with ARH (1.50% vs. 0.20%, OR = 9.814, 95% CI = 1.224–78.712, P = 0.032). The ureterovaginal fistula rate was higher with LRH than ARH. The rates of obturator nerve injury, bladder injury, vesicovaginal fistula, rectovaginal fistula, venous thromboembolism, bowel obstruction, chylous leakage, pelvic haematoma, and haemorrhage were similar between the groups.ConclusionsThe oncological outcomes of LRH and ARH for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with a tumour size less than 2 cm do not differ significantly. However, incidences of any 1 complication, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications were higher with LRH than ARH, with complications manifesting mainly as ureteral injury and uterovaginal fistula.     

Optimal timing of surgery following breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAdministration of chemotherapy before breast surgery has the potential to reduce the risk of distant recurrence by targeting micrometastasis as well as allowing a more minimalistic approach to surgical intervention. We performed a systematic review to determine the optimum timing of surgery post breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).MethodsThe primary outcome was to determine whether the timing of surgery post NACT impacted overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We compared patient outcomes between those who had surgery within 8 weeks of completion of NACT to those that had surgery after 8 weeks. An outcome comparison between <4 weeks and 4–8 weeks was also performed. Secondary outcome included complete pathological response (pCR) post NACT. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.ResultsFive studies, including 8794 patients were eligible for inclusion. Patients that had surgery within 8 weeks of completion of NACT had a statistically significant improved OS(OR 0.47, 95% c. i 0.34–0.65) and DFS(OR 0.71 (95% c. i 0.52–0.98, P = 0.04). There were no survival advantages associated with having surgery less than 4 weeks post completion of NACT (OR 0.78, 95% c. i 0.46–1.33, P = 0.37). There was no difference in pCR rate between those that had surgery <4 weeks and 4–8 weeks (OR 1.01, 95% c. i 0.80–1.28, P = 0.93).ConclusionThis meta-analysis shows that the optimum timing of surgery post completion of NACT is 4–8 weeks as it is associated with increased OS and DFS.     

Surgically treated oesophageal cancer developed in a radiated field: Impact on peri-operative and long-term outcomes

BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to compare peri-operative and long-term outcomes from oesophageal cancer (EC) (i) that arose in a previously radiated field (ECRF) versus primary (PEC) and among ECRF patients and (ii) radiotherapy-induced (RIEC) versus non-radiotherapy–induced EC (NRIEC).MethodsData were collected from 30 European centres from 2000 to 2010. Two thousand four hundred eighty nine EC patients surgically treated were included in the PEC group and 136 in the ECRF group, NRIEC group (n = 61) and RIEC group (n = 75). Propensity score matching analyses were used to compensate for differences in baseline characteristics.ResultsCompared to the PEC group, the ECRF group was characterised by less use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (0% versus 29.5%; P < 0.001), less pathological stage III/IV (31.6% versus 39.2%, P = 0.036), greater incidence of R1/2 margins (21.3% versus 10.9%; P < 0.001), increased in-hospital mortality (14.0% versus 7.1%; P = 0.003) and overall morbidity (68.4% versus 56.4%, P = 0.006). After matching, 5-year overall (28.8% versus 50.5%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–2.04; P = 0.003) and event-free (32.2% versus 42.5%; HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.18–2.05; P = 0.002) survivals were significantly reduced in the ECRF group. There were no significant differences in incidence or pattern of tumour recurrence. Comparing RIEC and NRIEC groups, there were no significant differences in short- or long-term outcomes before and after matching.ConclusionsECRF is associated with poorer long-term survival related to a reduced utilisation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and an increased incidence of tumour margin involvement at surgery. Outcomes appear to be dictated by the limitations related to previous radiotherapy administration more than the radiotherapy-induced carcinogenesis.     

Tumour grade and stage are associated with specific body composition phenotypes with visceral obesity predisposing the host to a less aggressive tumour in colorectal cancer

BackgroundSarcopenia, myosteatosis and visceral obesity (VO) are known to negatively impact on outcomes from colorectal cancer (CRC). Little is known about tumour factors associated with these body composition (BC) phenotypes. We aimed to identify whether histopathological tumour characteristics were associated with various BC phenotypes.MethodsA prospectively collected database of patients undergoing surgery for primary CRC at a tertiary referral unit in the United Kingdom was analysed. Sarcopenia, myosteatosis and VO were identified on preoperative CT. Binary logistic regression modelling was performed to determine significant associations between tumour stage, grade and BC phenotype.ResultsFinal analysis included 795 patients; median age 69, 56% male, 65% were sarcopenic, 72% myosteatotic, 52% VO and 20% had sarcopenic obesity (SO). VO patients were significantly less likely to have advanced T Stage (T3-4) OR0.62(95%CI 0.44–0.86, p = 0.005); nodal metastases OR0.60(95%CI 0.44–0.82, p = 0.001); vascular invasion OR0.63(95%CI 0.46–0.88, p = 0.006) and poor tumour differentiation OR0.49(95%CI 0.28–0.86, p = 0.012). Myosteatotic patients were more likely to have metastatic disease OR2.31(95%CI 1.15–4.63, p = 0.018) but less likely to have poorly differentiated tumours OR0.48(95%CI 0.27–0.86, p = 0.013). SO patients were significantly more likely to have poorly differentiated tumours OR2.01(95%CI 1.04–3.87, p = 0.037).ConclusionVO predisposes to earlier stage tumours with a less aggressive tumour phenotype. The SO group have adverse tumour characteristics which may be explained by differences in fat distribution. Myosteatosis relates to increased likelihood of distant metastasis that may be related to a systemic inflammatory response, despite the association with better differentiated tumours.     

Long-term outcome and axillary recurrence in elderly women (≥70 years) with breast cancer: 10-years follow-up from a matched cohort study

Background and objectivesThe oncological benefit of axillary surgery (AS), with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary dissection (ALND), in elderly women affected by breast cancer (BC) is controversial. We evaluated AS trends over a 10-year follow-up period as well as locoregional and survival outcomes in this subset of patients.MethodsPatients aged 70 years or older, treated between 1994 and 2008, were selected and divided in two groups, depending on whether or not AS was performed. A (1:1) matched analysis for all relevant clinicopathological features was performed. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and univariate Cox-proportional hazard ratio analysis.ResultsA total of 1.748 patients were identified and stratified by age (70–74, 75–79, 80–84). A matched analysis was performed for 252 patients: 122 who underwent AS and 122 who did not. At 10-year follow-up, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, distant metastasis and contralateral BC were similar, p = 0.83, p = 0.42 and p = 0.28, respectively. In the no-AS group, a significant increased risk of axillary lymph-node recurrence was identified at 5- and confirmed at 10-years (p = 0.038), without impact on overall survival at 5- and 10-years (p = 0.52). In the non-AS group, higher rate of axillary recurrence at 10-years was observed in patients with poorly differentiated (24.1%, 95% CI 7.2–46.2), highly proliferative (Ki67 ≥ 20%: 17.1%, 95% CI 0.6–33.3) and luminal B tumors (16.8%, 95% CI 5.9–35.5).ConclusionsAxillary staging in elderly women does not impact long-term survival. Tailoring surgery according to tumor biology and age may improve locoregional outcome.     

Prognostic impact of infectious complications after curative gastric cancer surgery

IntroductionThere have been few studies about the effect of infectious complications on recurrence or long-term survival outcome after curative gastric cancer surgery in large populations. This study was conducted to investigate the impact of infectious complications on long-term survival after curative gastrectomy in high volume center.MethodFrom January 2002 to December 2012, patients who underwent curative gastrectomy were enrolled. Infectious complications were defined as wound infection, intra-abdominal infection or postoperative pneumonia. Five-year overall survival was compared between two groups and followed by multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model.ResultOf 6585 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy, 413 (6.2%) had infectious complications after curative gastrectomy. The five-year overall survival rate was 86.0% in non-complication patients and 74.1% in infectious complications patients (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, Age over 70 years, male sex, higher ASA score, total or proximal gastrectomy, advanced stage and infectious complication had statistically worse survival. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that the infectious complication was independent prognostic factor (HR = 1.478, CI 95% 1.242–1.757 p < 0.001) as well as age over 70 years (HR = 2.434, CI 95% 2.168–2.734 p < 0.001), male sex (HR = 1.153, CI 95% 1.022–1.302 p = 0.014), higher ASA score (p < 0.001) and advanced Stage (p < 0.001). Local recurrence (P = 0.044), LN recurrence (P = 0.038) and hematologic recurrence (P = 0.033) were significantly associated with infectious complications.ConclusionPostoperative infectious complication was an independent prognostic factor for five-year overall survival after curative gastrectomy as well as known factors. A significant association between infectious complications and recurrence were also noted. The surgeon should try to prevent the infectious complications in gastric cancer surgery to improve the long term survival.     

The sigmoid take-off as a landmark to distinguish rectal from sigmoid tumours on MRI: Reproducibility,pitfalls and potential impact on treatment stratification

PurposeThe sigmoid take-off (STO) was recently introduced as a preferred landmark, agreed upon by expert consensus recommendation, to discern rectal from sigmoid cancer on imaging. Aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the STO, explore its potential treatment impact and identify its main interpretation pitfalls.MethodsEleven international radiologists (with varying expertise) retrospectively assessed n = 155 patients with previously clinically staged upper rectal/rectosigmoid tumours and re-classified them using the STO as completely below (rectum), straddling the STO (rectosigmoid) or completely above (sigmoid), after which scores were dichotomized as rectum (below/straddling STO) and sigmoid (above STO), being the clinically most relevant distinction. A random subset of n = 48 was assessed likewise by 6 colorectal surgeons. .ResultsInterobserver agreement (IOA) for the 3-category score ranged from κ0.19–0.82 (radiologists) and κ0.32–0.72 (surgeons), with highest scores for the most experienced radiologists (κ0.69–0.76). Of the 155 cases, 44 (28%) were re-classified by ≥ 80% of radiologists as sigmoid cancers; 36 of these originally received neoadjuvant treatment which in retrospect might have been omitted if the STO had been applied. Main interpretation pitfalls were related to anatomical variations, borderline cases near the STO and angulation of axial imaging planes.ConclusionsGood agreement was reached for experienced radiologists. Despite considerable variation among less-expert readers, use of the STO could have changed treatment in ±1/4 of patients in our cohort. Identified interpretation pitfalls may serve as a basis for teaching and to further optimize MR protocols.     

DNA methylome analysis identifies accelerated epigenetic ageing associated with postmenopausal breast cancer susceptibility

Aim of the studyA vast majority of human malignancies are associated with ageing, and age is a strong predictor of cancer risk. Recently, DNA methylation-based marker of ageing, known as ‘epigenetic clock’, has been linked with cancer risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the epigenetic clock is associated with breast cancer risk susceptibility and to identify potential epigenetics-based biomarkers for risk stratification.MethodsHere, we profiled DNA methylation changes in a nested case–control study embedded in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort (n = 960) using the Illumina HumanMethylation 450K BeadChip arrays and used the Horvath age estimation method to calculate epigenetic age for these samples. Intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (IEAA) was estimated as the residuals by regressing epigenetic age on chronological age.ResultsWe observed an association between IEAA and breast cancer risk (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.007–1.076, P = 0.016). One unit increase in IEAA was associated with a 4% increased odds of developing breast cancer (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.007–1.076). Stratified analysis based on menopausal status revealed that IEAA was associated with development of postmenopausal breast cancers (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.020–1.11, P = 0.003). In addition, methylome-wide analyses revealed that a higher mean DNA methylation at cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) islands was associated with increased risk of breast cancer development (OR per 1 SD = 1.20; 95 %CI: 1.03–1.40, P = 0.02) whereas mean methylation levels at non-island CpGs were indistinguishable between cancer cases and controls.ConclusionEpigenetic age acceleration and CpG island methylation have a weak, but statistically significant, association with breast cancer susceptibility.     

Sarcopenia and obesity among patients with soft tissue sarcoma – Association with clinicopathologic characteristics,complications and oncologic outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsSarcopenia and obesity may be associated with negative outcomes in many cancers, but their prevalence and impact in modern regimens for soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) have not been systematically studied. This study summarises and critically evaluates the current evidence-based literature on body mass index (BMI) and body composition among patients with STS, with respect to clinical and pathologic characteristics, treatment-associated morbidity and oncologic outcome.MethodsA systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed. Meta-analysis of the relationship between BMI, body composition and pathologic characteristics, operative morbidity and oncologic outcome was undertaken using RevMan v.5.4 using fixed or random effects methods as appropriate.Results14 studies including 3598 patients met inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported on BMI, two on CT and two on PET-CT assessment of body composition. BMI ranged from 14.6 to 63.7 kg/m², with obesity in 18%–39% of patients. Although some studies demonstrated larger tumours among patients with obesity, this was not significant on meta-analysis (P = 0.31, I² = 99%). There was no significant difference in tumour grade or histologic type according to BMI. Postoperatively, obesity was associated with increased risk of overall morbidity (odds ratio (OR) 2.03 [95% CI 1.41–2.92], P = 0.0001, I² = 22%), and wound morbidity (OR 1.32 [95% CI 1.02–1.71], P = 0.03, I² = 0%). Similar effects were observed in studies of visceral adiposity. No differences in functional outcomes were observed. There was a trend towards reduced local recurrence among patients with obesity (HR 0.64 [95% CI 0.38–1.08], P = 0.10, I² = 0%), but no difference in distant metastasis (HR 1.00 [95% CI 0.76–1.30], P = 0.98, I² = 0%) or overall survival (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.43–2.22], P = 0.95, I² = 64%). Various measures of sarcopenia were associated with poorer survival outcomes.ConclusionWhile obesity is associated with increased postoperative morbidity, it had no significant association with long-term oncologic outcomes. Sarcopenia may be associated with a poorer long-term prognosis. A greater understanding of the impact of nutritional status on disease characteristics and treatment outcomes is essential to facilitate improvements in clinical care for patients with STS.     

Prognostic features of upstaged pT3a renal tumors with fat invasion after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it time for a new subclassification?

IntroductionThe clinical management of pT3a pathologic-upstaged renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients is actually controversial. Aim of this study was i) to assess the impact of pT3a upstaging on oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cT1-T2 RCC; ii) to explore clinical and surgical predictors of pT3a upstaging; iii) to evaluate the differential impact of perinephric fat invasion (PFI) or sinus fat invasion (SFI) on survival outcomes after RAPN in case of upstaged pT3a RCC.Materials and methodsClinical and surgical data from consecutive RCCs treated with RAPN in a single referral centre between January 2017 and June 2021 were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Pathological upstaging to pT3a tumors with fat invasion was further stratified in SFI or PFI. Uni- and multivariable analysis were fitted to explore clinical and surgical predictors of disease recurrence.ResultsOverall, 1852 patients were enrolled and 179 (9.7%) with pT3a upstaging were found. Median age was 65 (IQR 56–73) years with a median BMI of 25.6 (23.6–29.0). At a median follow up of 26 (9–38) months, 76 (4.1%) patients showed disease recurrence. Multivariable analysis confirmed PADUA score ≥10 (OR 1.76, CI 95% 1.18–1.91, p = 0.001), age at surgery (OR 1.04, CI 95% 1.01–1.06, p = 0.01), clinical tumor diameter (OR 1.31, CI 95% 1.17–1.47, p = 0.001), tumor necrosis (OR 1.54, CI 95% 1.08–1.88, p = 0.001) and nucleolar grading ≥3 (OR 1.27, CI 95% 1.01–1.44, p = 0.001) as independent predictors of pT3a upstaging. Multivariate Cox regression model showed pathological sinus fat invasion as an independent predictor of disease recurrence (HR 3.43, CI 95% 1.51–7.77, p = 0.003) in pT3a upstaged group.ConclusionIn pathologically upstaged pT3a RCCs, sinus fat invasion was confirmed as independent predictor of disease relapse. In this light, the definition of novel risk categories in the pT3a patients setting should be encouraged.     

Retrospective Study to Examine Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Surgically Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThis study evaluated the association between elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical outcomes among adults treated with surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the US.Materials and MethodsAdults with NSCLC who underwent lung cancer surgery and had ≥1 CRP measurement prior to, or >1 month following, index surgery were identified in the Optum Clinformatics claims database. The association between elevated CRP (>10 mg/L) and risk of NSCLC recurrence/death was assessed separately during the 6 months before surgery (pre surgery cohort) and 2 years following surgery (post-surgery cohort) using multivariate regressions and Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsAfter adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics among patients in the pre surgery cohort with index surgery between 2016 to 2020 (n = 104), the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for NSCLC recurrence between elevated vs. non-elevated CRP was 2.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-4.60; P = .04). In the post surgery cohort (n = 264), the adjusted IRR for disease recurrence (elevated vs. non-elevated CRP) was 2.22 (95% CI=1.05-4.70; P = .04). In the pre surgery cohort, the odds of death were nearly two-fold (odds ratio [OR]=1.91; 95% CI=1.06-3.42; P = .03) among patients with elevated CRP. In the post surgery cohort, the OR was 1.62 (95% CI=0.88-2.97; P = .12). Among those with persistently elevated CRP prior to surgery, there was a significant overall trend of increased CRP over the 5-year period.ConclusionThese results support the association between elevated CRP and a higher risk of NSCLC recurrence/death in pre- and postsurgery cohorts. This study may shed lights on inflammation-suppressing treatments in patients with NSCLC.     

Association of Surgical Approach With Treatment Burden,Oncological Effectiveness,and Perioperative Morbidity in Adrenocortical Carcinoma

MicroabstractIn the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients treated with minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) had similar oncological outcomes and cumulative treatment burden with less morbidity compared with open adrenalectomy (OA). Although OA remains the standard of care for adrenal lesions concerninge for malignancy, MIA in appropriately selected patients may offer equivalent oncological outcomes.Introduction/BackgroundWe investigated the cumulative treatment burden, oncological effectiveness, and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing MIA compared with (OA) for patients with ACC.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed the NCDB for patients undergoing surgical resection (MIA vs. OA) for ACC from 2010 to 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess for an association of surgical approach with cumulative treatment burden (any adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy [RT], and systemic therapy), oncological effectiveness (positive surgical margins [PSM], lymph node yield [LNY], and overall survival [OS]), and perioperative morbidity (length of stay [LOS] and readmission) as appropriate.ResultsWe identified 776 patients that underwent adrenalectomy for ACC, of which 307 underwent MIA. We noted patients with larger tumors (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86, P < .001) were less likely to have MIA prior to IPTW. We did not appreciate a significant association of MIA with cumulative treatment burden or the use of any adjuvant therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60-1.21, P = .375), adjuvant RT (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59-1.50, P = .801), or adjuvant systemic therapy (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.21, P = .352). Patients undergoing MIA had similar oncological effectiveness of surgery and OS when compared with patients which underwent OA. Patients that underwent MIA had a significantly shorter LOS (IRR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = .001) and lower odds of readmission (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.91, P = .026).ConclusionsAlthough the standard of care for adrenal lesions suspicious for ACC remains OA, in appropriately selected patients, MIA may offer similar oncological effectiveness and cumulative treatment burden, with less morbidity, than OA.     

Impact of multicentre diagnostic workup in patients with pancreatic cancer on repeated diagnostic investigations,time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment: A nationwide analysis

BackgroundDue to the centralization of pancreatic surgery, patients with suspected pancreatic cancer may undergo diagnostic workup in both a non-pancreatic centre and a pancreatic centre, i.e. multicentre workup. This retrospective study assessed whether multicentre diagnostic workup is associated with repeated diagnostics, delayed time-to-diagnosis, delayed time-to-treatment, survival and whether variation existed among pancreatic cancer networks.MethodsThis nationwide study included all patients diagnosed with non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in 2015, registered by the Netherlands Cancer Registry. A delayed time-to-diagnosis was defined as ≥3 weeks from initial hospital visit to final diagnosis. A delayed time-to-treatment was defined as ≥6 weeks from the first hospital visit to start of first tumour treatment. Multilevel logistic regression analyses and survival analyses were performed.ResultsIn total, 931 patients with non-metastatic PDAC were included. Overall, 175 patients (19%) underwent a multicentre diagnostic workup, which was significantly associated with repeated diagnostic investigations (OR = 6.31, 95% CI 4.13–9.64, P < 0.0001), a delayed time-to-diagnosis (OR = 2.66 95% CI 1.74–4.06, P < 0.001), and a delayed time-to-treatment (OR = 1.93 95% CI 1.12–3.31, P = 0.02), but not with decreased survival (HR = 1.09 95% CI 0.83–1.44; P = 0.532). Variation in outcomes per network was observed, especially for time-to-treatment, though the ICC was not statistically significant (P = 0.065).ConclusionMulticentre diagnostic workup for patients with PDAC is associated with repeated diagnostic investigations, a delayed time-to-diagnosis and delayed time-to-treatment compared to patients with monocentre workup. To reduce costs and improve treatment times, efforts should be made to improve network coordination, for example via network care pathways.     

Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) versus open hepatectomy (OH) on the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) through a meta-analysis of studies using propensity score-matched cohorts.MethodsThe literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until August 31, 2022. Meta-analysis of surgical (major morbidity, the length of hospital stay, 90-day postoperative mortality), oncological (R0 resection rate, lymph node dissection rate) and survival outcomes (1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival) was performed using a random effects model. Data were summarized as relative risks (RR), mean difference (MD) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).ResultsSix case-matched studies with 1054 patients were included (LH 518; OH 536). Major morbidity was significantly lower (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37–0.88, P = 0.01) and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (MD = −2.44, 95% CI = −4.19 to −0.69, P = 0.006) in the LH group than in the OH group, but there was no significant difference in 90-day postoperative mortality between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in R0 resection rate, lymph node dissection rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival or disease-free survival between the LH and OH groups.ConclusionsLH has better surgical outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes and survival outcomes than does OH on ICC. Therefore, laparoscopy is at least not inferior to open surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.     

Meta-analysis of oncological outcomes of sigmoid cancers: A hidden epidemic of R1 “palliative” resections

BackgroundColon cancer outcomes are now inferior to rectal cancer outcomes. The sigmoid colon is the most common site of colonic cancer. The aim of this review was to investigate the oncological outcomes for sigmoid cancer.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. We included any study of the oncological outcomes for sigmoid cancer such as local recurrence, distant recurrence and disease free survival. A systematic search was conducted in Medline from inception to November 2016. Study quality was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017069326).ResultsThe search terms returned 1323 results. We identified a total of 17 eligible studies including 5953 patients. The pooled local recurrence rate was 10.5% in 15 studies with 5148 patients (95% CI 0.07–0.14) and heterogeneity measured by I² was 94%. The pooled distant recurrence rate was 19.5% (7 studies, 2040 patients, 95% CI (0.14–0.25), I² 90%). The pooled disease free survival at 5 years was 80.4% (5 studies, 2336 patients, 95% CI 78.6%–82.1%, I² 11.5%.). The median Newcastle-Ottawa score was 4 out of 9. R1 and R2 resections were excluded or not described in 16/17 studies. Two studies described R1 and R2 rates of 15–20%.ConclusionThe pooled local recurrence rate of sigmoid cancer of 10.5% is higher than contemporary rates of local recurrence of rectal cancer. A large number of papers fail to describe or include R1 resections of sigmoid cancer, which are frequently described as palliative.     

Surgical efficacy and quality of wide resection of the pelvic peritoneum in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

PurposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of adding an extensive pelvic peritoneal stripping procedure, termed “wide resection of the pelvic peritoneum,” (WRPP) to standard surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer on survival effectiveness and to investigate the role of ovarian cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the pelvic peritoneum.MethodsA total of 166 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing surgical treatment at Kumamoto University Hospital between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were divided into three groups based on the surgical approach: standard surgery (SS) group (n = 36), WRPP group (standard surgery plus WRPP, n = 100), and rectosigmoidectomy (RS) group (standard surgery plus RS, n = 30). Survival outcomes were compared between the three groups. CD44 variant 6 (CD44v6) and EpCAM expression, as markers of ovarian CSCs, in peritoneal disseminated tumors were evaluated using immunofluorescence staining.ResultsWith respect to patients with stage IIIA–IVB ovarian cancer, there were significant differences in overall and progression-free survival between the WRPP and SS groups, as revealed by univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–0.69; P = 0.003 and HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.95; P = 0.032, respectively) and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17–0.70; P = 0.003 and HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.95; P = 0.032, respectively). Further, no significant differences were observed in survival outcomes between the RS group and the SS or WRPP group. Regarding the safety of WRPP, no significant differences in major intraoperative and postoperative complications were found between the three groups. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed a high percentage of CD44v6/EpCAM double-positive ovarian cancer cells in peritoneal disseminated tumors.ConclusionThe present study demonstrates that WRPP significantly contributes to improved survival in patients with stage IIIA–IVB ovarian cancer. WRPP could result in eradicating ovarian CSCs and disrupting the CSC niche microenvironment in the pelvic peritoneum.