Mortality,complications and failure to rescue after surgery for esophageal,gastric, pancreatic and liver cancer patients based on minimum caseloads set by the German Cancer Society

BackgroundThe German Cancer Society (DKG) board certifies hospitals in treating esophageal, gastric, liver and pancreatic cancer among others. There has been no systematic verification of the number of major surgical resections set by DKG certification with regards to in-house mortality and failure to rescue (FtR).MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of anonymized nationwide hospital billing data (DRG data, 2009–2017). Inclusion criteria were based on the annual surgical minimum caseload (SMC) in accordance with DKG certification.Results171,429 datasets were identified, including 31,140 esophageal, 54,155 gastric, 57,343 pancreatic and 28,791 liver resections. In-house mortality ranged from 6.2% for gastric resections to 8.1% for pancreatic resections. Differences in in-house mortality between hospitals which fulfilled SMC on average and those which did not fulfill SMC on average were 40.8% (5.3% vs 8.2%) for esophageal, 32.3% (4.8% vs 6.8%) for gastric and 45.7% (6.1% vs 9.8%) for pancreatic resections, while it was 8.2% higher in SMC-hospitals (7.6% vs 7.0%) for liver resections. Complication occurrence rates for esophageal, gastric and pancreatic resections were similar in SMC- and non-SMC-hospitals while FtR in hospitals fulfilling SMC was significantly lower. Data for liver resections demonstrated the same trends only in a sub-analysis of complex procedures.ConclusionThis study demonstrates an association between caseload threshold defined by DKG and lower mortality in esophageal, gastric, pancreatic and complex liver surgery. In these resections, FtR was reduced if SMC was fulfilled.     

Hospital volume following major surgery for gastric cancer determines in-hospital mortality rate and failure to rescue: a nation-wide study based on German billing data (2009–2017)

Background

For many cancer resections, a hospital volume-outcome relationship exists. The data regarding gastric cancer resection—especially in the western hemisphere—are ambiguous. This study analyzes the impact of gastric cancer surgery caseload per hospital on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue in Germany.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from 2009 to 2017 who underwent gastric resection were identified from nation-wide administrative data. Hospitals were grouped into five equal caseload quintiles (I–V in ascending caseload order). Postoperative deaths and failure to rescue were determined.

Results

Forty-six thousand one hundred eighty-seven patients were identified. There was a significant shift from partial resections in low-volume hospitals to more extended resections in high-volume centers. The overall in-house mortality rate was 6.2%. The crude in-hospital mortality rate ranged from 7.9% in quintile I to 4.4% in quintile V, with a significant trend between volume categories (p?<?0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, quintile V hospitals (average of 29 interventions/year) had a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0.50 (95% CI 0.39–0.65), compared to the baseline in-house mortality rate in quintile I (on average 1.5 interventions/year) (p?<?0.001). In an analysis only evaluating hospitals with more than 30 resections per year mortality dropped below 4%. The overall postoperative complication rate was comparable between different volume quintiles, but failure to rescue (FtR) decreased significantly with increasing caseload.

Conclusion

Patients who had gastric cancer surgery in hospitals with higher volume had better outcomes and a reduced failure to rescue rates for severe complications.

     

Comparison of three-year oncological results after restorative low anterior resection,non-restorative low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

IntroductionOncological outcome might be influenced by the type of resection in total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. The aim was to see if non-restorative LAR would have worse oncological outcome. A comparison was made between non-restorative low anterior resection (NRLAR), restorative low anterior resection (RLAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR).Materials and methodsThis retrospective cohort included data from patients undergoing TME for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2017 in eleven Dutch hospitals. A comparison was made for each different type of procedure (APR, NRLAR or RLAR). Primary outcome was 3-year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year local recurrence (LR) rate.ResultsOf 998 patients 363 underwent APR, 132 NRLAR and 503 RLAR. Three-year OS was worse after NRLAR (78.2%) compared to APR (86.3%) and RLAR (92.2%, p < 0.001). This was confirmed in a multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR 1.85 (1.07, 3.19), p = 0.03). The 3-year DFS was also worse after NRLAR (60.3%), compared to APR (70.5%) and RLAR (80.1%, p < 0.001), HR 2.05 (1.42, 2.97), p < 0.001. The LR rate was 14.6% after NRLAR, 5.2% after APR and 4.8% after RLAR (p = 0.005), HR 3.22 (1.61, 6.47), p < 0.001.ConclusionNRLAR might be associated with worse 3-year OS, DFS and LR rate compared to RLAR and APR.     

Oncological outcomes after major vascular resections for primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma

BackgroundThe surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcomas frequently involves complex multivisceral resections, however retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS) rarely invade major abdominal vessels. The aim of the study was to assess association of major vascular resections with outcome of primary LPS.MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent resection at our institutions for primary LPS between 2002 and 2019 were included. A propensity matched analysis was performed, adjusting the groups for the variables of Sarculator, to assess the effect of vascular resection on oncological outcomes.ResultsOverall 425 patients were identified. Twenty-four (5%) patients had vascular resection. At final pathology 18 patients had vascular infiltration, 2 vascular encasement and 4 involvement without infiltration. Vascular resection was associated with longer operative time (480′ vs. 330’; p < 0.001) and greater need for transfusions (4 vs. 0 units; p < 0.001), and was burdened by a higher rate of major complications (54% vs. 25%; p = 0.002). After propensity matched analysis, patients undergoing vascular resection had a lower 5-year OS (60% vs. 81%; p = 0.05), and a higher incidence of local and distant recurrence at 5 years (local: 45% vs. 24%, p = 0.05; distant: 20% vs. 0%, p = 0.04).ConclusionsVascular resection is feasible and safe even in the context of multivisceral resection for primary retroperitoneal liposarcomas, although associated to a higher complication rate. However, the independent association between vascular involvement and a higher risk of local recurrence, distant metastases and death may imply a more aggressive biology, which should be factored in the initial management of this complex disease.     

Defining Textbook Outcome in liver surgery and assessment of hospital variation: A nationwide population-based study

IntroductionTextbook outcome (TO) is a composite outcome measure covering the surgical care process in a single outcome measure. TO has an advantage over single outcome parameters with low event rates, which have less discriminating impact to detect differences between hospitals. This study aimed to assess factors associated with TO, and evaluate hospital and network variation after case-mix correction in TO rates for liver surgery.MethodsThis was a population-based retrospective study of all patients who underwent liver resection for malignancy in the Netherlands in 2019 and 2020. TO was defined as absence of severe postoperative complications, mortality, prolonged length of hospital stay, and readmission, and obtaining adequate resection margins. Multivariable logistic regression was used for case-mix adjustment.Results2376 patients were included. TO was accomplished in 1380 (80%) patients with colorectal liver metastases, in 192 (76%) patients with other liver metastases, in 183 (74%) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 86 (51%) patients with biliary cancers. Factors associated with lower TO rates for CRLM included ASA score ≥3 (aOR 0.70, CI 0.51–0.95 p = 0.02), extrahepatic disease (aOR 0.64, CI 0.44–0.95, p = 0.02), tumour size >55 mm on preoperative imaging (aOR 0.56, CI 0.34–0.94, p = 0.02), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (aOR 0.73, CI 0.54–0.98, p = 0.04), and major liver resection (aOR 0.50, CI 0.36–0.69, p < 0.001). After case-mix correction, no significant hospital or oncological network variation was observed.ConclusionTO differs between indications for liver resection and can be used to assess between hospital and network differences.     

The clinical impact of malnutrition on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal resection surgery for colon or rectal cancer: Propensity score matched analysis of 2011–2017 US hospitals

Background & aimsMalnutrition can be prevalently found in patients with significant-to-advanced colorectal cancer, who potential require colorectal resection procedures; to accurately describe the postoperative risks, we used a propensity-score matched comparison of national database to analyze the effects of malnutrition on post-colectomy outcomes.Methods2011–2017 National inpatient Sample was used to isolate inpatient ceases of colorectal resection procedures, which were stratified using malnutrition into malnutrition-present cohort and malnutrition-absent controls; the controls were propensity-score matched with the study cohort using 1:1 ratio and compared to the following endpoints: mortality, length of stay, costs, postoperative complications.ResultsAfter matching, there were 11357 with and without malnutrition who underwent colorectal resection surgery; in comparison, malnourished patients had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (6.14 vs 3.22% p < 0.001, OR 1.96 95%CI 1.73–2.23), length of stay (15.4 vs 9.61d p < 0.001), costs ($163, 962 vs $102,709 p < 0.001), and were more likely to be discharged to non-routine discharges, including short term hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home healthcare. In terms of complications, malnourished patients had higher bleeding (2.87 vs 1.68% p < 0.001, OR 1.73 95%CI 1.44–2.07), wound complications (4.31 vs 1.34% p < 0.001, OR 3.32 95%CI 2.76–3.99), infection (6 vs 2.62% p < 0.001, OR 2.38 95%CI 2.07–2.73), and postoperative respiratory failure (7.27 vs 3.37% p < 0.001, OR 2.25 95%CI 1.99–2.54).ConclusionThis study demonstrates the presence of malnutrition to be associated with adverse postoperative outcomes including mortality and complications in patients undergoing colorectal resection surgery for colon cancer.     

Real-world implementation of a geriatric-specific ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colonic cancer surgery

BackgroundThe aim of this single-center observational study was to evaluate the impact of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, combined with systematic geriatric assessment and support, on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients aged 70 or older undergoing colonic cancer surgery.MethodsTwo groups were formed from an actively maintained database from all patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic surgery for neoplasms during a defined period before (standard group) or after (ERAS group) the introduction of an ERAS program associated with systematic geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was postoperative 90-day morbidity. Secondary outcomes were total length of hospital stay, initiated and completed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) rate, and 1-year mortality rate.ResultsA total of 266 patients (135 standard and 131 ERAS) were included in the study. Overall 90-day morbidity and mean hospital stay were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group (22.1% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.02; and 6.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.01, respectively). There were no differences in readmission rates and anastomotic complications. AC was recommended in 114 patients. The rate of initiated treatment was comparable between the groups (66.6% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.69). The rate of completed AC was significantly higher in the ERAS group (50% vs. 20%, p < 0.01) with a lower toxicity rate (57.1% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.002). The 1-year mortality rate was higher in the standard group (7.4% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe combination of ERAS protocols and geriatric assessment and support reduces the overall morbidity rate and improves 12-month oncologic outcomes.     

Non-curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer does not result in additional risk of postoperative morbidity compared to curative gastrectomy

BackgroundNon-curative gastrectomy (nCG) for gastric cancer can be considered in selected cases to relieve symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent nCG and compare these results with an intended curative gastrectomy (CG).Materials and methodsAll patients who underwent both nCG and CG in the Netherlands were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2011–2016). In this population-based cohort study postoperative morbidity, mortality, readmissions and short-term oncological outcomes were appraised. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable groups of patients who underwent nCG versus CG, using patient and tumor characteristics.ResultsOf the 2202 eligible patients, 115 patients underwent nCG and 2087 underwent CG. After PSM, 115 nCG-patients were matched to 227 CG-patients. More conversions from laparoscopic to open surgery occurred during nCG (10·4 versus 2·6%, p = 0·007). Although postoperative mortality was higher after nCG in the original cohort (9·6 versus 4·8%, p = 0·026), after PSM there was no difference between groups (9·6 versus 7·0%, p = 0·415). Postoperative morbidity, re-interventions and readmission rates did not differ significantly between groups. Resection of additional organs (30·4 versus 11·5%, p < 0·001) and R+ resections (65·2 versus 12·3%, p < 0·001) occurred more frequently during nCG.ConclusionsnCG does not lead to additional postoperative risks compared to CG in patients with similar characteristics, and may be considered in fit patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, randomized trials evaluating potential (survival) benefits of nCG should be awaited.     

Risk factors for local recurrence and long term survival after minimally invasive intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: Multivariate analysis in 161 patients

IntroductionIntersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anal-sparing technique as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection in selected patients. Oncological safety is still debated. This study analyses long-term oncological results and evaluates risk factors for local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) after minimally-invasive ISR.Materials and methodsRetrospective single-center data were collected from a prospectively maintained colorectal database. A total of 161 patients underwent ISR between 2008 and 2018. OS and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test). Risk factors for OS and LRFS were assessed with Cox-regression analysis.ResultsMedian follow-up was 55 months. LR occurred in 18 patients. OS and LRFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 91%, and 80% and 96%, 89%, and 87%, respectively. Tumor size (p = 0.035) and clinical T-stage (p = 0.029) were risk factors for LRFS on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, tumor size (HR 2.546 (95% CI: 0.976–6.637); p = 0.056) and clinical T-stage (HR 3.296 (95% CI: 0.941–11.549); p = 0.062) were not significant. Preoperative CEA (p < 0.001), pathological T-stage (p = 0.033), pathological N-stage (p = 0.016) and adjuvant treatment (p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for OS on univariate analysis. Preoperative CEA (HR 4.453 (95% CI: 2.015–9.838); p < 0.001) was a prognostic factor on multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThis study confirms the oncological safety of minimally-invasive ISR for locally advanced low-lying rectal tumors when performed in experienced centers. Despite not a risk factor for LR, tumor size and, locally advanced T-stage with anterior involvement should be carefully evaluated for optimal surgical strategy. Preoperative CEA is a prognostic factor for OS.     

Perioperative treatment and radical cystectomy for bladder cancer – a population based trend analysis of 10,338 patients in the Netherlands

BackgroundIn Europe, population-based data concerning perioperative treatment (PT) and radical cystectomy (RC) are lacking. We assessed temporal trends in PT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NAC], neoadjuvant radiotherapy [NAR], adjuvant chemotherapy [AC], adjuvant radiotherapy [AR]) and RC in the Netherlands and identified patients' and hospital characteristics associated with PT.MethodsThis nationwide, retrospective, population-based study included cTa/is, T1-4, N0-3, M0-1 bladder cancer patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry who underwent RC with curative intent between 1995 and 2013. PT-administration over time was compared with chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify characteristics associated with PT usage. The sub-groups cT2-4N0M0 and cT2-4, N0 or NX, M0 or MX were separately analysed.ResultsIn total, 10,338 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-six percent did not receive PT, 7.0% received NAC (or induction chemotherapy [IC]), 3.2% NAR, 1.8% AC, and 2.1% AR. NAC usage increased from 0.6% in 1995 to 21% in 2013 (p < 0.001), application of NAR decreased from 15% to 0.4% (p < 0.001). Usage of AC and AR in 2013 was <1.5%. Comparable temporal trends were found in 6032 patients staged cT2-4N0M0. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that younger age, ≥cT3, ≥cN1 and treatment in academic/teaching hospitals were associated with NAC or IC (all p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe increase in NAC administration in the Netherlands reflects a slow but steady adoption of evidence-based guidelines over the last two decades. Considerable variability in patients' and hospital characteristics in the likelihood of receiving NAC exists. Conversely, NAR, AR and AC are hardly administered anymore.     

Variations in treatment policies and outcome for bladder cancer in the Netherlands

AimTo describe the population-based variation in treatment policies and outcome for bladder cancer in the Netherlands.MethodsAll newly diagnosed patients with primary bladder cancers during 2001–2006 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 29,206). Type of primary treatment was analysed according to Comprehensive Cancer Centre region, hospital type (academic, non-academic teaching or other hospitals) and volume (≤5, 6–10 or >10 cystectomies yearly). For stage II–III patients undergoing cystectomy we analyzed the proportion of lymph node dissections and 30-days mortality.Results44% of patients with stage II–III bladder cancer underwent cystectomy, while 26% were not treated with curative intent. Cystectomy was the preferred option in three of nine regions, radiotherapy in two, and two regions waived curative treatment more often. Between 2001 and 2006 the number of cystectomies increased with 20% (n = 108). Twenty-one percent (n = 663) of these procedures were performed in 44 low-volume hospitals. In 79% of the cystectomies lymph node dissections were performed, more often in high and medium-volume centers (82% and 81% respectively) than in low-volume hospitals (71%, the odds ratio being 1.5). The overall 30-days post-operative mortality rate was 3.4% and increased with older age. It was significantly lower in high-volume centers (1.2%).ConclusionTreatment policies for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the Netherlands showed regional preferences and a gradual increase of cystectomy. Cystectomy albeit considered as golden standard, was performed in a minority of the muscle-invasive cases. In high-volume institutions, lymph node dissection rates were higher and post-operative mortality rates were lower.     

Introduction of minimally invasive surgery for distal and total gastrectomy: a population-based study

BackgroundMinimally invasive gastrectomy has been introduced in Western populations during the last decade. As minimally invasive distal gastrectomy (MIDG) versus total gastrectomy (MITG) are procedures with a different complexity, outcomes may differ. The aim of this population-based cohort study was to evaluate the safety of MIDG and MITG.Materials and methodsAll patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (2011–2016). Propensity score matching was applied to create comparable groups of patients receiving open distal gastrectomy (ODG) versus MIDG and open total gastrectomy (OTG) versus MITG, using patient and tumor characteristics. Postoperative outcomes and short-term oncological outcomes were appraised.ResultsOf the 1970 eligible patients, 1138 underwent distal gastrectomy and 832 underwent total gastrectomy. For distal gastrectomy, 390 ODG were matched to 288 MIDG patients. Although overall postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar, patients who underwent MIDG encountered less intra-abdominal abscesses (4% vs. 1%, p = 0.039) and wound complications (6% vs. 2%, p = 0.021). The median hospital stay was shorter after MIDGs (9 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). For total gastrectomy, 323 OTG patients were matched to 258 MITG patients. Overall postoperative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay were similar, whereas the anastomotic leakage rate was higher after MITGs (11% vs. 17%, p = 0.030). Short-term oncological outcomes between both groups were equal for distal and total gastrectomy.ConclusionBenefits of MIG during the early introduction were demonstrated for distal gastrectomy but not for total gastrectomy. An increased anastomotic leakage rate was encountered for MITG.     

Contemporary rates and predictors of open conversion during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer

ObjectivesTo test contemporary rates and predictors of open conversion at minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN: laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy).Materials and methodsWithin the National Inpatient Sample database (2008–2015) we identified all MIPN patients and patients that underwent open conversion at MIPN. First, estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) tested temporal trends of open conversion. Second, univariable and multivariable logistic regression models predicted open conversion at MIPN. All models were weighted and adjusted for clustering, as well as all available patient and hospital characteristics.ResultsOf 7649 MIPN patients, 287 (3.8%) underwent open conversion. The rates of open conversion decreased over time (from 12 to 2.4%; EAPC: 24.8%; p = 0.004). In multivariable logistic regression models predicting open conversion, patient obesity achieved independent predictor status (OR:1.80; p < 0.001). Moreover, compared to high volume hospitals, medium volume (OR:1.48; p = 0.02) and low volume hospitals (OR:2.11; p < 0.001) were associated with higher rates of open conversion. Last but not least, when the effect of obesity was tested according to hospital volume, the rates of open conversion ranged from 2.2 (non obese patients treated at high volume hospitals) to 9.8% (obese patients treated at low volume hospitals).ConclusionOverall contemporary (2008–2015) rate of open conversion at MIPN was 3.8% and it was strongly associated with patient obesity and hospital surgical volume. In consequence, these two parameters should be taken into account during preoperative patients counselling, as well as in clinical and administrative decision making.     

Liver resection in elderly patients with extensive CRLM: Are we offering an adequate treatment? A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundData on the management of elderly patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are scarce and conflicting. This study assesses differences in management and long-term oncological outcomes between older and younger patients with CRLM and a high Tumour Burden Score (TBS).MethodsInternational multicentre retrospective study on patients with CRLM and a category 3 TBS, submitted to liver resection. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age (younger and older than 75) and were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and multivariable regression models. Differences in management and oncological outcomes including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.ResultsThe study included 386 patients, median follow-up was 48 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a higher ASA score (p = 0.035), less synchronous CRLM (47% vs 68%, p = 0.003), a lower median number of lesions (1 vs 3, p = 0.004) and less perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) (66% vs 88%, p < 0.001) in the elderly group.Despite the absence of CTx being an independent predictor of decreased RFS and OS (HR 0.760, p = 0.044 and HR 0.719, p = 0.049, respectively), the elderly group still received less CTx (OR 0.317, p = 0.001) than the younger group.After PSM (n = 100 patients), the two groups were comparable, however, CTx administration was still significantly lower in the elderly group.ConclusionLiver resection should be considered in patients aged 75 and older, even if they present with extensive liver disease. Despite CTx being associated with improved oncological outcomes, a large percentage of elderly patients with CRLM are undertreated.     

Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal surgical routes in laparoscopic nodal staging for locally advanced cervical cancers (FIGO IB3-IVA)

BackgroundThis study compares morbidity and mortality associated with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAAL) for pretherapeutic nodal staging of locally advanced cervical cancers (FIGO IB3–IVA).MethodsPre-, per- and postoperative data of patients treated for locally advanced stage cervical cancer between 1999 and 2018 in 12 French referral centers (FRANCOGYN Study Group) were retrospectively collected.ResultsThe study was conducted using a sample of 448 patients, of whom 223 (49,8%) underwent retroperitoneal (group 1) and 225 (50,2%) had transperitoneal PAAL (group 2). No differences were noted concerning clinical and histological characteristics between the two groups. Among these 448 patients, 23 (5,1%) had an intraoperative complication (9 (2,0%) in group 1 and 14 (3,1%) in group 2, p = 0.28) and 47 (10,5%) had a postoperative complication (22 (4,9%) in group 1 and 25 (5,6%) in group 2, p = 0.44), only one of which required revision surgery but the patient died. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (3.97 versus 4.88 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups; 34 of 223 patients in group 1 (15.3%) and 40 of 225 patients in group 2 (15.6%) died (HR = 0.968, 95% CI [0.591–1.585]). There was no significant difference in recurrence-free or overall survival between the two groups.ConclusionRetroperitoneal PAAL appears as a valuable and safety surgical route for nodal staging in locally advanced cervical cancer compared with standard transperitoneal PAAL.     

Survival variability across hospitals after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A multilevel survival analysis on a high-resolution population-based study

IntroductionResection is the cornerstone of curative management for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Hospital surgical volume influence post-operative mortality. Few is known about impact on survival.MethodsPopulation included 763 patients resected for PDAC within the 4 French digestive tumor registries between 2000 and 2014. Spline method was used to determine annual surgical volume thresholds influencing survival. A multilevel survival regression model was used to study center effect.ResultsPopulation was divided into three groups: low-volume (LVC) (<41 hepatobiliary/pancreatic procedures/year), medium-volume (MVC) (41–233) and high-volume centers (HVC) (>233). Patients in LVC were older (p = 0.02), had a lower rate of disease-free margins (76.7% vs. 77.2% and 69.5%, p = 0.028) and a higher post-operative mortality than in MVC and HVC (12.5% and 7.5% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.004). Median survival was higher in HVC than in other centers (25 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.0001). Survival variance attributable to center effect accounted for 3.7% of total variance. In multilevel survival analysis, surgical volume explained the inter-hospital survival heterogeneity (non-significant variance after adding the volume to the model p = 0.3). Patients resected in HVC had a better survival than in LVC (HR 0.64 [0.50–0.82], p < 0.0001). There was no difference between MVC and HVC.ConclusionRegarding center effect, individual characteristics had little impact on survival variability across hospitals. Hospital volume was a major contributor to the center effect. Given the difficulty of centralizing pancreatic surgery, it would be wise to determine which factors would indicate management in a HVC.     

Outcomes following synchronous liver resection,cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases: A bi-institutional study

PurposeSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal liver (CRLM) and peritoneal metastases (CRPM) has traditionally been contraindicated. However, latest practice promotes specialist, multidisciplinary-led consideration for select patients. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of synchronous resection in the management of CRLM and CRPM from two tertiary referral centres.MethodThis bi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study included patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection, CRS and HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020. Patients treated with ablative liver techniques, staged operative approaches and extra abdominal disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with survival and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV).ResultsTwenty-three patients were included. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 9 (range 0–22). There were two major liver resections and 21 minor resections. CC-0 resections were achieved in all patients. Major morbidity occurred in 7 patients. There were no deaths at 90 days. PCI was independently associated with morbidity (p = 0.04). PCI >10 (p = 0.069), major morbidity (p = 0.083) and presence of KRAS mutation (p = 0.052) approached significance for poor OS. Median follow up was 21 months (4–54 months). Median OS was 37 months, 3-year survival 54%, and median DFS 18 months.ConclusionSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with low-volume CRPM and CRLM. Increasing PCI is associated with postoperative major morbidity, and should be considered during operative planning.     

Annual hospital volume and colorectal cancer survival in a population-based nationwide cohort study in Finland

PurposeTo examine the annual hospital volume of surgery in relation to survival in colorectal cancer. Previous studies on hospital volume and survival following colorectal cancer surgery are conflicting.MethodsAll 49 032 patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer in 1987–2016 in Finland were included, with complete follow-up until December 31, 2019. Primary outcome was 5-year mortality. Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for quartiles of annual hospital volume for colorectal surgery, adjusted for calendar period, age, sex, comorbidity, stage, tumor location and oncological therapy. Additionally, colon and rectal cancer surgery were assessed separately. Sensitivity analysis of patients with confirmed curative intent was conducted.ResultsCompared to highest quartile (≥108 resections annually), lowest hospital volume (≤37 resections annually) was associated with slightly increased 5-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.12). A pre-planned subgroup-analysis suggested a slightly improved 5-year survival in high-volume institutions for rectal cancer, but not colon cancer surgery. Sensitivity analysis including only those operated with confirmed curative intent suggested no differences between hospital volume groups in colorectal, colon or rectal cancer for 5-year all-cause mortality.ConclusionHigher hospital volume is associated with slightly improved all-cause 5-year mortality in colorectal cancer surgery, but this effect may be limited to rectal cancer surgery only. Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery should be investigated further using large datasets. These results do not support centralization of colon cancer surgery based on hospital volume only.     

Long-term nationwide trends in the treatment of and outcomes among pancreatic cancer patients

Whilst treatment modalities for pancreatic cancer patients have evolved in recent years, their impact on outcomes remains relatively unexamined on a national scale. We aimed to analyse changes in overall survival and trends in surgical and oncological treatments in pancreatic cancer patients diagnosed in the periods 2000 through 2008 and 2009 through 2016 in Finland. We collected data for pancreatic cancer patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2016, gathering data from the Finnish national registries on surgeries, oncological treatments and time of death. Follow-up continued through the end of 2018. We compared patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 to those diagnosed between 2009 through 2016. Our study comprised 14 712 pancreatic cancer patients. There was no significant change in the national resection rate (8.1% vs 8.0%, p = 0.690). In radical surgery patients, median survival improved from 20 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 18–22) to 28 months (CI 25–31) (p < 0.001), with 1-year survival ranging from 70% to 81%. In the no-surgery group, median survival slightly improved from 3.1 months (CI 3.0–3.3) to 3.3 months (CI 3.1–3.4) (p < 0.001). The proportion of radical surgery patients receiving preoperative oncological treatment increased from 4% to 13% (p < 0.001) and only postoperative treatment from 25% to 47% (p < 0.001). Whilst the resection rate did not increase, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients improved, particularly amongst radical surgery patients resulting most likely from the fact that a larger proportion of patients receive more effective oncological treatments.     

Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis

IntroductionMulticenter retrospective analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors (i.e. 3 points for the ‘E’ domain of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score) was performed.Materials and methodsPatients’ demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, functional, pathological and oncological data were analyzed and compared with those of patients with exophytic and mesophytic masses (i.e. 1 and 2 points for the ‘E’ domain, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables for trifecta achievement (negative margin, no postoperative complications, and 90% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] recovery).ResultsOverall, 147 patients were included in the study group. Patients with a completely endophytic mass had bigger tumors (mean 4.2 vs. 4.1 vs. 3.2 cm; p < 0.001) on preoperative imaging and higher overall R.E.N.A.L. score. There was no difference in mean operative time. Estimated blood loss was higher in the endophytic group (mean 177.75 vs. 185.5 vs. 130 ml; p = 0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter for the exophytic group (median 16 vs. 21 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in patients with endophytic tumor (24.8% vs. 19.5% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001). Six (4.5%) patients had positive surgical margins, there was no difference between groups. Trifecta was achieved in 44 patients in endophytic group (45.4 vs. 68.8 and 50.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for trifecta revealed that clinical tumor size (odds ratio: 0.667, 95% confidence interval: 0.56–0.79, p < 0.001) was only significant predictor for trifecta achievement.ConclusionsOur findings confirm that RAPN in case of completely endophytic renal masses can be performed with acceptable outcomes in centers with significant robotic expertise.