An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance

This study, performed using a specially designed apparatus that included 10 aligned brackets, evaluated the frictional resistance generated by conventional stainless steel (SS) brackets (Victory Series), self-ligating Damon SL II brackets, Time Plus brackets, and low-friction ligatures (Slide) coupled with various SS, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and beta-titanium (TMA) archwires. All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot and the orthodontic wire alloys were 0.016, 0.016 x 0.022, and 0.019 x 0.025 inch NiTi, 0.017 x 0.025 inch TMA, and 0.019 x 0.025 inch SS. Each bracket-archwire combination was tested 10 times. Coupled with 0.016 inch NiTi, Victory brackets generated the most friction and Damon SL II the least (P < 0.001); with 0.016 x 0.022 inch NiTi, the self-ligating brackets (Time and Damon SL II) generated significantly lower friction (P < 0.001) than Victory Series and Slide ligatures; with 0.019 x 0.025 inch SS or 0.019 x 0.025 inch NiTi, Slide ligatures generated significantly lower friction than all other groups. No difference was observed among the four groups when used with a 0.017 x 0.025-inch TMA archwire. These findings suggest that the use of an in vitro testing model that includes 10 brackets provides information about the frictional force of the various bracket-archwire combinations.     

国产3B自锁托槽、3B直丝弓托槽和Damon Q自锁托槽椅旁操作时间的对比研究

目的比较国产3B自锁托槽、Damon Q自锁托槽以及国产3B直丝弓托槽的椅旁操作时间,为国产3B自锁托槽的临床应用提供参考依据。方法选择正畸患者80例,其中20人使用国产3B自锁托槽(3B自锁组),20人使用Damon Q自锁托槽(Damon Q自锁组),20人使用国产3B直丝弓托槽+结扎丝结扎(结扎丝组),20人使用国产3B直丝弓托槽+橡皮圈结扎(橡皮圈组)。待患者上下颌牙列基本排齐后,使用0.018*0.025英寸镍钛方丝入槽,记录全口结扎和拆除时间。采用单因素方差分析,比较4组患者的结扎和拆除时间。结果 3B自锁组的结扎、拆除和总时间均明显短于结扎丝组和橡皮圈组(P<0.01)。3B自锁组和Damon Q自锁组在结扎、拆除和总时间方面的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论无论是采用结扎丝结扎还是橡皮圈结扎,国产3B自锁托槽的椅旁操作时间明显短于直丝弓托槽,且与进口的Damon Q自锁托槽相比无明显统计学差异。     

Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appliance

The objective was to compare the frictional forces generated by new nonconventional passive elastomeric ligatures (NCL) and conventional elastomeric ligatures (CL) under dry conditions. An experimental model reproducing the right buccal segment of the upper arch and consisting of five stainless steel 0.022-inch preadjusted brackets (from the second premolar through the central incisor) was used to assess both static and kinetic frictional forces produced by NCL and CL. The frictional forces generated by the 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel wire with the two types of elastomeric ligatures were recorded by sliding the wire into the aligned brackets. The friction produced by the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire was evaluated both in the presence of aligned brackets and of three-mm misaligned canine bracket. The amount of both static and kinetic frictions were minimal (<10 g) in the NCL group in the presence of aligned brackets with both types of wires, whereas it ranged from a minimum of 95.6 g for the 0.014-inch superelastic nickel titanium wire to a maximum of 590.7 g for the 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel wire when using CL. The amount of both static and kinetic frictions in the presence of a misaligned canine bracket in the NCL group were less than half of that shown by the CL group. A recently developed passive ligature system is able to produce significantly lower levels of frictional forces in vitro when compared with conventional elastomeric modules.     

Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance

The aims of this study were to determine the mean tensile force of four different elastomeric modules, the archwire seating force of different ligation methods, and its effect on frictional resistance.To determine the mean tensile force, each elastomeric module (purple, grey, Alastik, and SuperSlick) was extended by 5 mm using two hooks attached to a load cell using a Nene M3000 testing machine. To assess the median archwire seating force, a maxillary premolar bracket (3M Unitek) was welded to a sheet of stainless steel (SS) and glued to a Perspex block. The bracket base was removed and the cut continued into the Perspex below. A length of test wire was taken and bent to form a "U" shape, with the middle portion 20 mm in length. The free ends of the wire were secured to the load cell of the Nene testing machine. Two wire sizes were tested, 0.017 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch SS. The load cell was activated and the force with which the wire was displaced into the slot by the ligation method was measured. Four types of elastomeric module were tested together with a pre-formed 0.09 inch SS ligature. The experimental method used to determine the mean frictional force of each module and wire size was carried out using a method described previously.Statistically significant differences existed in the mean tensile forces and median archwire seating forces between the elastomeric modules. Grey modules with either size wire produced the lowest median archwire seating force, whereas SS ligatures produced the highest forces. SS ligatures with either wire produced the lowest mean frictional forces, whereas grey modules produced significantly higher mean frictional force (P < 0.01). The force with which the wire was seated into the bracket did not seem to be related to the subsequent amount of mean frictional force produced.     

Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys

This investigation was designed to determine the effects of wire size and alloy on frictional force generated between bracket and wire during in vitro translatory displacement of bracket relative to wire. Stainless steel (SS), cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), nickel-titanium (NiTi), and beta-titanium (beta-Ti) wires of several sizes were tested in narrow single (0.050-inch), medium twin (0.130-inch) and wide twin (0.180-inch) stainless steel brackets in both 0.018- and 0.022-inch slots. The wires were ligated into the brackets with elastomeric ligatures. Bracket movement along the wire was implemented by means of a mechanical testing instrument, and frictional forces were measured by a compression cell and recorded on an X-Y recorder. beta-Ti and NiTi wires generated greater amounts of frictional forces than SS or Co-Cr wires did for most wire sizes. Increase in wire size generally resulted in increased bracket-wire friction. The wire size-alloy interaction on the magnitude of bracket-wire friction was statistically significant (p less than 0.005). With most wire sizes and alloys, narrow single brackets were associated with lower amounts of friction than wider brackets were. The levels of frictional forces in 0.018-inch brackets ranged from 49 gm with 0.016-inch SS wires in narrow single brackets to 336 gm with 0.017 x 0.025-inch beta-Ti wires in wide twin brackets. Similarly for 0.022-inch brackets, frictional forces ranged from 40 gm with 0.018-inch SS wires in narrow single brackets to 222 gm with 0.019 x 0.025-inch NiTi wires in wide twin brackets.     

A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.

Abstract

This ex-vivo study compared the static frictional resistance of three self-ligating brackets with a conventional steel-ligated Ultratrimm bracket. The effects of archwire size (0.020, 0.019 x 0.025 and 0.021 x 0.025-inch), bracket/archwire angulation (0, 5 and 10 degrees) and the presence of unstimulated human saliva were investigated. The study demonstrated that both increases in wire size and bracket/archwire angulation resulted in increased static frictional resistance for all bracket types tested, with the presence of saliva having an inconsistent effect. Mobil-Lock Variable-Slot had the least friction for all wires for 0 degree angulation. However, with the introduction of angulation, the values were comparable to those of the other brackets. Activa brackets had the second lowest frictional resistance, although high values were found with 0.019 x 0.025-inch wires. SPEED brackets demonstrated low forces with round wires, although with rectangular wires or in the presence of angulation, friction was greatly increased. Ultratrimm brackets produced large individual variation, confirming the difficulty in standardizing ligation force, although under certain conditions, significantly larger frictional forces were observed. In conclusion, self-ligating brackets showed reduced frictional resistance in comparison to steel ligated brackets only under certain conditions.     

弓丝与结扎方法对摩擦力影响的实验研究

目的:了解4种弓丝和2种结扎方法对托槽与弓丝摩擦力的影响。方法:在干燥条件下,按正交实验设计,使用LJ-500型拉力实验机的微型测力计,测试4种弓丝与6种直丝托槽组合及采用2种结扎法时在后牙段的动、静摩擦力。所得数据进行方差分析和二次响应回归分析。结果:在弓丝与所有托槽组合中,0.018英寸×0.025英寸(1in=2.54cm)的不锈钢方丝动、静摩擦力最小,0.019英寸×0.025英寸的不锈钢方丝动、静摩擦力最大,0.018与0.020英寸不锈钢圆丝介于两者之间,但0.018英寸圆丝的动摩擦力较大,0.020英寸圆丝的静摩擦力较大。动、静摩擦力平均百分比从小到大依次为:0.019英寸×0.025英寸方丝、0.020英寸圆丝、0.018英寸×0.025英寸方丝、0.018英寸的圆丝。弹力橡皮圈结扎的动、静摩擦力及动、静摩擦力平均百分比均大于不锈钢丝结扎。结论:0.018英寸的不锈钢圆丝不适宜滑动机制;在0.022英寸系统的直丝托槽中,用0.019英寸×0.025英寸不锈钢方丝关闭间隙,应尽可能加强支抗控制;干燥条件下弹力橡皮圈结扎不利于托槽、弓丝滑动。     

Measurements of the torque moment in various archwire-bracket-ligation combinations

The torque moment generated by third-order bends is important for tooth movement. The purpose of this study was to measure the torque moment that can be delivered by various archwire and bracket combinations at the targeted tooth. Stainless steel (SS) upper brackets with 0.018 and 0.022 inch slots, two sizes of nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) alloy wires, and three sizes of SS wires for each bracket were used. The wire was ligated with elastics or wire. The torque moment delivered by the various archwire-bracket-ligation combinations was measured using a torque gauge. Statistical analysis was undertaken using analysis of variance (multiple comparison tests and post hoc using Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The torque moment increased as the degree of torque and wire size increased. There was no significant difference in torque moment between the SS and Ni-Ti wires at lower or higher than 40 degrees torque. The torque moment with wire ligation was significantly larger than that with elastic ligation with 0.016 × 0.022 and 0.017 × 0.025 inch Ni-Ti wires in the 0.018 inch slot brackets and the 0.017 × 0.025 and 0.019 × 0.025 inch SS and Ni-Ti wires in the 0.022 inch slot brackets. However, there was no significant difference in torque moment between either ligation method when using the full slot size wires.     

Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.

Frictional forces during simulated sliding tooth movement were measured with a model that was representative of the clinical condition. The model allowed tipping of the tooth until contact was established between the arch wire and diagonally opposite corners of the bracket wings; it also allowed rotation until the wire contacted opposite corners of the ligature tie, or the buccal shield with self-ligating brackets, and the base of the slot. Conventional and self-ligating stainless steel brackets as well as conventional ceramic brackets, and ceramic brackets with a stainless steel slot, all with 0.022 inch bracket slot, were tested with 0.019 x 0.025 inch arch wires of stainless steel, nickel titanium, and beta titanium. Each of the 12 bracket-arch wire combinations was tested 10 times. No significant interaction was detected between brackets and arch wires (P = .89), but the bracket and arch wire effects were significant (P < .001). The pairwise differences between conventional and self-ligating stainless steel brackets and ceramic brackets with stainless steel slot were not significant. However, the conventional ceramic brackets generated significantly higher friction than the other brackets tested. Beta titanium arch wires produced higher frictional forces than nickel titanium arch wires, but no significant differences were found between each of the two and stainless steel arch wires. Attempts to identify differences in surface scratches of the arch wires produced by the different brackets were unsuccessful.     

In vitro frictional forces generated by three different ligation methods

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference between the frictional forces produced by a passive self-ligating bracket (SLB) in vitro and a conventional bracket (CB) used with two types of elastomeric ligatures. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The brackets, wires and ligation methods used in vitro were a passive SLB and a CB used with two types of elastomeric ligatures (conventional elastomeric ligature [CEL] and unconventional elastomeric ligatures [UEL]). The bracket ligation systems were tested with two types of wires (0.014' super elastic nickel titanium wire and 0.019' x 0.025' stainless steel wire). Resistance to sliding of the bracket/wire/ligature systems was measured with an experimental model mounted on the crosshead of an Instron testing machine with a 10 N load cell. Each sample was tested 10 consecutive times under a dry state. RESULTS: Frictional forces close to 0 g were recorded in all tests with SLB and in all tests with UEL on CB with both wire types. Resistance to sliding increased significantly (87-177 g) (P < .05) when CEL on CB was used with both wires. CONCLUSION: UELs may represent a valid alternative to passive SLBs for low-friction biomechanics.     

�����в��봫ͳ�вۻ��������ĶԱ�ʵ���о�

目的对自锁托槽与传统托槽滑动阻力的大小及变化规律进行对比研究。方法本研究于2011年9—12月在山西医科大学口腔医院和太原理工大学应用力学与生物医学研究所共同完成。根据人体实际弹性模量比例制作含牙周膜的上颌仿真模型,测试自锁托槽和传统托槽分别与0．016英寸、0．018英寸的镍钛丝和0．017英寸×0．022英寸、0．018英寸×0．025英寸、0．019英寸x0．025英寸的不锈钢方丝匹配时的滑动阻力大小。结果使用同种弓丝时,滑动阻力由小到大排列：DamonQ被动自锁托槽〈Tomy主动自锁托槽〈传统金属托槽,两两比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。同一种托槽情况下,除0．019英寸×0．025英寸不锈钢方丝外,其余滑动阻力都随弓丝直径的增大而增大,且两两比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论临床实践中托槽类型与弓丝的匹配对滑动阻力的影响十分重要,从而实现牙齿的快速有效移动。     

Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules

INTRODUCTION: Super Slick (TP Orthodontics, LaPorte, Ind), a polymeric-coated ligature, has recently been introduced to the orthodontic market. The manufacturer claims it will significantly reduce friction. The purposes of this study were to determine whether Super Slick modules show lower friction than round and rectangular modules and to put the frictional forces into perspective with a self-ligating bracket. METHODS: Maxillary premolar, stainless steel, self-ligating, and monocrystalline brackets with .022-in slots were used with straight lengths of .018-in and .019 x .025-in stainless steel wires. Buccal segment models were set up with 1 molar band and 2 premolar brackets for each test group: self-ligating brackets with the slide closed, self-ligating brackets with the slide open, and monocrystalline brackets. The latter 2 groups were tested with all 3 types of elastomeric module. Each setup was tested both under dry conditions and after soaking in a water bath for 1 hour. RESULTS: The self-ligating brackets demonstrated virtually zero friction with each combination of wire and environmental condition. When the different bracket and elastomeric module combinations were compared, significant differences were observed. In all but 2 combinations, round modules provided the least resistance to sliding and rectangular modules the greatest, with Super Slick modules in between the 2. The self-ligating bracket provided the least resistance to sliding of all the bracket/ligation combinations and almost entirely eliminated friction under the conditions of this experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Super Slick modules demonstrated greater resistance to sliding than conventional round modules, but not rectangular. Self-ligating brackets provided the least resistance to sliding of all bracket/ligation combinations and were the only method that almost entirely eliminated friction. The .018-in and .019 x .025-in wires exhibited similar friction in the dry state, but, when wet, the .018-in wire produced less friction. Ceramic brackets demonstrated greater resistance to sliding than stainless steel brackets. Lubrication reduced the friction with .018-in wires and increased it for .019 x .025-in wires.     

Self-Ligation Esthetic Brackets with Low Frictional Resistance

Objective:To test the frictional resistance forces (FRS) generated between several archwires and (1) interactive self-ligating (ISL) brackets and (2) conventionally ligated (CL) brackets.Materials and Methods:Frictional forces produced between three different archwire combinations and self-ligating (SL) brackets (ceramic and metal-slot or all-metal) and CL brackets (metal or ceramic) were evaluated in a dry environment. The three ISL brackets tested were In-Ovation-C, In-Ovation-R, and Damon 3. The three CL brackets were Mystique with Neo Clip, Clarity, and Ovation. Each bracket was tested with 0.020″ SS, 0.019″ × 0.025″ SS and 0.018″ × 0.018″ coated SS.Results:The ISL brackets generally exhibited the lowest frictional forces irrespective of the bracket material and the wire size, and CL brackets exhibited consistently higher frictional forces. Mystique with Neo Clip produced the lowest frictional resistance of all brackets. The In-Ovation-C brackets demonstrated significantly lower frictional resistance than the SL brackets In-Ovation-R and Damon 3 as well as the CL brackets Clarity and Ovation.Conclusions:The ISL ceramic brackets produced the lowest frictional resistance of all the self-ligating brackets. The CL ceramic brackets produced the greatest friction.     

A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires

An in vitro study of simulated canine retraction was undertaken to evaluate the difference in frictional resistance between stainless steel arch wires and steel and ceramic brackets with elastomeric, steel, and self-ligation. Each bracket slot was 0.018 x 0.025 inch. The arch wires used were 0.014-inch, 0.016-inch, 0.018-inch, 0.016 x 0.016-inch, and 0.016 x 0.22-inch stainless steel. A testing apparatus was designed to attempt to simulate the clinical situation in which teeth tip slightly while they slide along the arch wire. Under these testing conditions, the self-ligating steel bracket did not demonstrate less friction than the elastic or steel-ligated stainless steel brackets. For most wire sizes, elastomer-ligated ceramic brackets demonstrated the greatest friction when compared with other bracket/ligation technique combinations. The clinical significance of this study becomes apparent when stainless steel brackets are used on the posterior teeth and ceramic brackets are used on the anterior teeth. If sliding mechanics are used, the anterior teeth may be more resistant to movement than the posterior teeth because of the greater friction of the ceramic brackets. This could result in more posterior anchorage loss than would be expected if only one type of bracket were used.     

Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets

The purpose of this research was to investigate the torque capacity of active and passive self-ligating brackets compared with metallic, ceramic, and polycarbonate edgewise brackets. Six types of orthodontic brackets were included in the study: the self-ligating Speed and Damon2, the stainless steel (SS), Ultratrimm and Discovery, the ceramic bracket, Fascination 2, and the polycarbonate bracket, Brillant. All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot size and were torqued with 0.019 x 0.025-inch SS archwires. For this purpose, the labial crown torque of an upper central incisor was measured in a simulated intraoral clinical situation using the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS). A torque of 20 degrees was applied and the correction of the misalignement was simulated experimentally with the OMSS. Each bracket/wire combination was measured five times. Maximum torquing moments and torque loss were determined. The results were analysed with one-way analysis of variance, with the bracket serving as the sole discriminating variable, and the Tukey test at the 0.05 level of significance. The ceramic bracket (Fascination 2) presented the highest torquing moment (35 Nmm) and, together with a SS bracket, the lowest torque loss (4.6 degrees). Self-ligating, polycarbonate, and selective metallic brackets demonstrated almost a 7-fold decreased moment developed during insertion of a 0.019 x 0.022-inch SS wire into a 0.022-inch slot and a 100 per cent increase in loss.     

The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics.

During orthodontic tooth movement with the preadjusted edgewise system, friction generated at the bracket/archwire interface tends to impede the desired movement. The method of ligation is an important contributor to this frictional force. This in vitro study investigated the effect of ligation method on friction and evaluated the efficacy of the new slick elastomeric modules from TP Orthodontics (La Porte, Ind), which are claimed to reduce friction at the module/wire interface. Slick modules were compared with regular nonslick modules, stainless steel ligatures, and the SPEED self-ligating bracket system (Strite Industries, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada). The effect of using slick modules with metal-reinforced ceramic (Clarity, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and miniature brackets (Minitwin, 3M Unitek) was also examined. Results showed that, when considering tooth movement along a 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel archwire, saliva-lubricated slick modules can reduce static friction at the module/archwire interface by up to 60%, regardless of the bracket system. The SPEED brackets produced the lowest friction compared with the 3 other tested bracket systems when regular modules were used. The use of slick modules, however, with all of the ligated bracket types tested significantly reduced friction to below the values recorded in the SPEED groups. Loosely tied stainless steel ligatures were found to generate the least friction.     

Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.

This study measured and compared the level of frictional resistance generated between stainless steel self-ligating brackets (Damon SL II, SDS Ormco, Glendora, Calif), polycarbonate self-ligating brackets (Oyster, Gestenco International, G?thenburg, Sweden), and conventional stainless steel brackets (Victory Series, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif), and 3 different orthodontic wire alloys: stainless steel (Stainless Steel, SDS Ormco), nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti, SDS Ormco), and beta-titanium (TMA, SDS Ormco). All brackets had a.022-in slot, whereas the orthodontic wire alloys were tested in 3 different sections:.016,.017 x.025, and.019 x 0.025 in. Each of the 27 bracket and archwire combinations was tested 10 times, and each test was performed with a new bracket-wire sample. Both static and kinetic friction were measured on a custom-designed apparatus. All data were statistically analyzed (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests). Stainless steel self-ligating brackets generated significantly lower static and kinetic frictional forces than both conventional stainless steel and polycarbonate self-ligating brackets, which showed no significant differences between them. Beta-titanium archwires had higher frictional resistances than stainless steel and nickel-titanium archwires. No significant differences were found between stainless steel and nickel-titanium archwires. All brackets showed higher static and kinetic frictional forces as the wire size increased.     

Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance

A jig was constructed to measure the frictional forces created by various tip and torque values in association with two types of straightwire bracket moving along tainless steel (SS) archwires. Forces were measured during translation of the bracket using an Instron machine. Steel and cobalt chromium brackets were tested in association with 0.019 x 0.025 and 0.021 x 0.025 inch steel archwires at tips from 0 to 3 degrees and torque values in 2 degree increments from 0 to 6 degrees.The mean values for static (2.2 N) and kinetic (2.1 N) friction were very similar (P = 0.71), as were the overall friction values for stainless steel (2.1 N) and chromium cobalt (2.2 N) brackets of similar dimensions (P = 0.44). Use of 0.021 x 0.025 inch wire produced three times as much friction as 0.019 x 0.025 inch wire, 3.0 N against 1.2 N (P < 0.01). Increased tip and torque were associated with highly significant increases in friction (P < 0.01). Every degree of tip produced approximately twice as much friction as comparable torque. The main conclusion of the study was that space closure should be completed on a 0.019 x 0.025 inch archwire before a 0.021 x 0.025 inch wire is used to complete tooth alignment.