A randomized trial of prolonged high dose of interferon plus ribavirin for hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon alone

Retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon (IFN) alone with the standard dose of IFN [3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW)] plus ribavirin for 24 weeks has yielded low sustained virological response (SVR), averaging 8%. The aim of the present, open-labelled, randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy of IFN induction therapy followed by prolonged high dose of IFN plus ribavirin in nonresponders. One hundred and fifty-one patients were randomized to receive 5 MU daily of IFN alfa-2b (group 1, n = 73) or 5 MU TIW of IFN alfa 2b (group 2, n = 78) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU TIW) plus ribavirin (1000/1200 mg/daily) for 48 weeks in both groups. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the sustained virological response (SVR) at 24-week follow-up was 33 and 23% for group 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.17). The overall SVR was 52 and 18% in patients with genotype 2/3 and 1/4, respectively. Among genotype 1/4 patients the SVR was 29 and 11% for age younger or older than 40 years. Compared with genotype 2/3 patients, the risk (95% confidence interval) of nonresponse to retreatment was 3.0-fold (1.17-8.0) in younger genotype 1/4 patients and 8.4-fold (3.0-23.29) in older genotype 1/4 patients. In conclusion these results suggest that retreatment with a reinforced regimen should be focused in nonresponder genotype 2/3 patients and younger genotype 1/4 patients, who are most likely to benefit. Induction therapy does not improve SVR.     

Daily dose of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: a randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection remains disappointing. METHODS: In 1999, we started a multicentre study comparing two regimens of recombinant interferon (IFN) alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Group A (90 patients) received ribavirin plus IFN alpha-2b 5 MU/day for 1 month (induction therapy) followed by IFN alpha-2b 5 MU thrice weekly for 5 months. Group B (85 patients) received ribavirin plus IFN alpha-2b 5 MU thrice weekly for 6 months. Responders in both arms received IFN alpha-2b 3 MU thrice weekly for a further 6 months. A follow-up evaluation was performed at 18 months. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five consecutive treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 infection were enrolled in the study. A sustained virological response (SVR) was obtained in 51 (29%) patients: 28 in group A (31%) and 23 in group B (27%). HCV-RNA clearance was greater at 3 months among patients who received induction therapy (57 vs 39%; p < 0.02). Age, sex, and initial viral load did not influence the achievement of a SVR. HCV clearance at the end of the study was lower in cirrhotic patients (3/26 vs 48/149; p < 0.05). The only SVR in patients with cirrhosis occurred in those from group A (p < 0.05). Both regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the low rate of SVR in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 infection treated with IFN alpha-2b plus ribavirin. A 4-week induction regimen was slightly superior to standard IFN alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Although the number of patients with cirrhosis was low, induction therapy seemed to be more effective in cirrhotics. Given its safety and tolerability, the induction regimen evaluated here may be a therapeutic option in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 infection.     

Efficacy of interferon alpha-2b induction therapy before retreatment for chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) patients who have failed previous treatment have low sustained viral response (SVR) rates with repeat treatment. We evaluated whether interferon (IFN) induction during retreatment improves response rates. METHODS: Two randomized, controlled trials were conducted in chronic HCV patients who failed IFN. In Study 1, patients received IFN 3 MU daily plus ribavirin (RBV) 1000 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 44 weeks (induction; n=232), or IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=237). In Study 2, patients received IFN 5 MU B.I.D. plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN) 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 46 weeks (induction; n=201), or PEG-IFN 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=206). The primary end point for both trials was SVR. RESULTS: Induction did not increase SVR compared with non-induction, but did increase the on-treatment response among genotype non-1 patients in Study 2. By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, SVR in Study 1 was 13% for induction vs. 9% for non-induction (P=NS). In Study 2 (ITT), SVR was 20% for induction vs. 24% for non-induction (P=NS). However, by non-ITT analysis of Study 2, genotype non-1-previous non-responders showed significantly higher response rates with induction than non-induction. CONCLUSION: For chronic HCV patients who have failed IFN, induction with retreatment does not improve SVR, but may be beneficial for patients with genotype non-1 HCV.     

Reinforced interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin is more effective than standard combination therapy in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C previously nonresponsive to interferon: a randomized trial

Interferon-alpha (IFN) monotherapy results in sustained virological clearance in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a reinforced regimen combining ribavirin and high-dose IFN for 48 weeks compared with a nonreinforced regimen combining a standard IFN regimen and ribavirin for 24 weeks in nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 231 patients with chronic hepatitis C and previous nonresponse to IFN monotherapy were randomized. The reinforced group (n = 114) received IFN-2b 6 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW) and ribavirin for 48 weeks, and the nonreinforced group (n = 117) received IFN-2b 3 MU TIW and ribavirin for 24 weeks. The main outcome measure was a sustained virological response, defined as negative serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA 24 weeks following the end of treatment. This endpoint was determined in 98 patients of the reinforced group and 105 patients of the nonreinforced group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained virological response was observed in 29 of the 98 patients (29.6%) in the reinforced group vs 16 of the 105 patients (15.2%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with a sustained virological response were treated with a reinforced regimen [odds ratio (OR) 2.9; P = 0.06] and genotype 2 or 3 (OR 8.8; P < 0.0002). A total of 160 patients had paired biopsies before and after treatment. Histological activity improvement was observed in 32 of 80 patients (40%) and fibrosis worsening in 26 of 80 patients (33%) in the reinforced group vs 13 of 80 (16%) and 19 of 80 (24%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.30 and 0.20, respectively). Hence in nonresponders, a high-dose 48-week regimen of IFN and ribavirin combination was more effective than a regimen with interferon at lower dose and ribavirin for 24 weeks only.     

Comparison of a 6-month course peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in treating Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan

Previous studies in Caucasian patients showed treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon/ribavirin was well tolerated, and produced a higher response rate especially in genotype 1 infections. However, it is unknown whether this conclusion can be extrapolated to patients with Chinese ethnic origin. A total of 153 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive either weekly injection of peginterferon alpha-2b 1.5 mcg/kg plus oral ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day, depending on body weight) (PEG group, n = 76) or 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b t.i.w. plus ribavirin (IFN group, n = 77) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as the sustained disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment by polymerase chain reaction assay. Baseline demographic, viral and histological characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, HCV genotype 1 patients showed a significantly higher SVR in patients receiving PEG-IFN rather than IFN (65.8%vs 41.0%, P = 0.019), but no difference was found in genotype non-1 patients (PEG vs IFN: 68.4%vs 86.8%, P = 0.060). Genotype 1 patients (28.6%) in the PEG-IFN group relapsed, as compared with 52.9% in the IFN group (P = 0.040). Multivariate analyses showed early virological response at week 12 of therapy and genotype non-1 were significant predictors to SVR. As compared with the IFN group, patients receiving PEG-IFN had a significantly higher rate of discontinuation, dose reduction, fever, headache, insomnia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. In genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patient, PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin had significantly better SVR and lower relapse rate when compared to IFN/ribavirin. Both regimens can be recommended for genotype non-1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patients. However, a higher rate of adverse events and discontinuance of therapy were noted in patients treated with PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin.     

Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial of combination of ribavirin and high dose interferon-α in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C

This trial investigated the efficacy of a combination of high-dose interferon-α (IFN-α) with ribavirin in IFN nonresponders. Study protocol: 304 patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with 5 MU IFN-α2b (IntronA^®, Schering-Plough) per TIW for 3 months. Nonresponders (defined by HCV-RNA positivity in serum after the 3 months of therapy) were randomized either to continue with IFN (5 MU IFN per TIW followed by 10 MU per TIW for each 3 months) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin (1–1.2 g per day) (group B). ALT was measured in monthly intervals, HCV-RNA in 3 monthly intervals. Pretreatment characteristics of the randomized patients were as follows: group A, n = 76; m/f, 54/22; 16% cirrhosis, age, 45.7 ± 12 years; ALT (U per litre), 66 ± 35; group B, n = 81; m/f, 57/24; 17% cirrhosis, age, 48.2 ± 12; ALT, 71 ± 40. After 9 months of treatment, nine (11.6%) and 27 (32.5%, P = 0.0066) patients were HCV-RNA negative and 51 and 39 were HCV-RNA positive, in groups A and B, respectively. There were 17 drop-outs in group A and 15 in group B. Six months after treatment only two patients in group A (2.5%) and five (6%, P = 0.06) in group B had normal ALT and no detectable HCV-RNA in serum. In addition to the well-known side-effects of IFN the mean haemoglobin concentration dropped by 2 g per litre in group B. These data indicate that a combination of high-dose IFN with ribavirin is effective in inducing a short-lasting complete response in one-third of IFN nonresponders. Prolonged treatment with IFN/ribavirin may be necessary to obtain a sustained response.     

High doses of interferon in combination with ribavirin are more effective than the standard regimen in patients with HCV genotype 1 chronic hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the present, open-labelled, controlled study was to determine whether 5 MU of interferon (IFN) alpha 2b combined with a standard dose of ribavirin might increase the rate of viral clearance in all patients with chronic HCV hepatitis or at least in those with an unfavourable genotype. METHODS: A total of 298 previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized to 5 or 3 MU of interferon alpha 2b 3 times per week with 1000-1200 mg of ribavirin daily (148 and 150 patients, respectively). Patients were treated for 12 months and observed for 6 months posttreatment. RESULTS: In patients infected with HCV genotype 1, the sustained virologic response was 37.8% (95% CI 27.3-48.1) with IFN 5 MU and 19.2% (95% CI 10.1-28.2) with IFN 3 MU (P=0.008). Out of 45 sustained responders with genotype 1, 31 (69%) had received 5 MU and 14 (31.1%) the standard 3 MU dose of IFN in combination with ribavirin (P=0.01). Of the 86 responders infected with genotype non-1, 39 (45.3%) were from the 5 MU IFN group and 47 (54.6%) were from the 3 MU IFN group; these figures were not significant. At the multivariate analysis of baseline features for all patients, the variables with an independent effect for a sustained response were genotype non-1 (odds ratio (OR) 3.98, 95% CI 2.36-6.40), and the histological grading (score 0-2) (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.12-5.51) and staging (score 0-1) (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.95). For patients with genotype 1 only the high regimen of IFN entered the model (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.13-5.05), whereas for patients with genotype non-1 an age of <40 years (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.23-5.70) and staging (score 0-1) (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.07-5.28) were independent predictors of a sustained response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that when treating naive patients with genotype 1, there is a significant increase in the rate of sustained virologic clearance by increasing the dose of IFN given in combination with ribavirin.     

Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial of combination of ribavirin and high dose interferon-alpha in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C

This trial investigated the efficacy of a combination of high-dose interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) with ribavirin in IFN nonresponders. Study protocol: 304 patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with 5 MU IFN-alpha2b (IntronA(R), Schering-Plough) per TIW for 3 months. Nonresponders (defined by HCV-RNA positivity in serum after the 3 months of therapy) were randomized either to continue with IFN (5 MU IFN per TIW followed by 10 MU per TIW for each 3 months) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin (1-1.2 g per day) (group B). ALT was measured in monthly intervals, HCV-RNA in 3 monthly intervals. Pretreatment characteristics of the randomized patients were as follows: group A, n = 76; m/f, 54/22; 16% cirrhosis, age, 45. 7 +/- 12 years; ALT (U per litre), 66 +/- 35; group B, n = 81; m/f, 57/24; 17% cirrhosis, age, 48.2 +/- 12; ALT, 71 +/- 40. After 9 months of treatment, nine (11.6%) and 27 (32.5%, P = 0.0066) patients were HCV-RNA negative and 51 and 39 were HCV-RNA positive, in groups A and B, respectively. There were 17 drop-outs in group A and 15 in group B. Six months after treatment only two patients in group A (2.5%) and five (6%, P = 0.06) in group B had normal ALT and no detectable HCV-RNA in serum. In addition to the well-known side-effects of IFN the mean haemoglobin concentration dropped by 2 g per litre in group B. These data indicate that a combination of high-dose IFN with ribavirin is effective in inducing a short-lasting complete response in one-third of IFN nonresponders. Prolonged treatment with IFN/ribavirin may be necessary to obtain a sustained response.     

Long-term follow-up of previous hepatitis C virus positive nonresponders to interferon monotherapy successfully retreated with combination therapy: are they really cured?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether in chronic hepatitis C-positive patients who failed to respond to interferon (IFN) monotherapy a sustained response obtained with retreatment using the combination therapy of IFN + ribavirin can be safely considered to reflect eradication of the infection. METHODS: Prospective follow-up of a cohort of 97 patients who responded to retreatment with different regimens of IFN + ribavirin after failing to respond to a first IFN monotherapy course. The patients were followed throughout 7 yr of follow-up with determinations of HCV viremia every 6 months. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, 11 patients (11.3%) showed a viremic reappearance. HCV late relapse rates were 0%, 13%, 20%, and 12% in patients retreated, respectively, with 3 MU IFN + ribavirin for 12 months (Group 1), 5 MU IFN + ribavirin for 12 months (Group 2), 3 MU IFN + ribavirin for 6 months (Group 3), and 5 MU IFN + ribavirin for 6 months (Group 4) (Group 2 vs Group 3, p= 0.005). The virologic relapses occurred within 2 yr from therapy withdrawal. Among patients with genotype 1 and 4, the long-term response was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 3 (15%vs 3%, p= 0.03). In patients with genotype 2 and 3, the long-term virological response was not affected by the different regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Nonresponders to IFN monotherapy who achieve a sustained virologic response after retreatment with IFN + ribavirin stand a discrete risk of HCV reactivation within 2 yr after therapy.     

Treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to interferon with high-dose interferon alpha with or without ribavirin: final results of a prospective randomized trial. Austrian Hepatitis Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of high-dose interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) with or without ribavirin in interferon (IFN) non-responders. STUDY DESIGN: 304 chronic hepatitis C patients received 5 MU IFN-alpha2b (IntronA, Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) three times a week for 3 months. Non-responders were randomized either to continue with IFN (IFN 5 MU/TIW followed by 10 MU/TIW, each for 3 months) alone (group A: n = 76, m: f = 54: 22, age 45.7 +/- 12 years, 16% cirrhosis, alanine aminotransferase [ALT] 66 +/- 35 U/l) or in combination with ribavirin (approximately 14 mg/kg/day) (group B: n = 81, m: f = 57: 24, age 48.2 +/- 12 years, 17% cirrhosis, ALT 71 +/- 40 U/l). At the end of treatment, patients were followed for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Virological response at end of treatment and 6 months thereafter. SETTING: University hospitals and tertiary referral centres. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, eight (10.8%) and 25 (31.3%, P= 0.0066) patients were HCV-RNA negative, and 51 and 39 were HCV-RNA positive, in groups A and B, respectively. There were 17 drop-outs in each group. Six months after treatment, only one patient in group A (1.3%) and seven patients (8.6%, P= 0.06) in group B had normal ALT and undetectable serum HCV-RNA. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of high-dose IFN with ribavirin induces a short-lasting complete response in about one-third of IFN-non-responders.     

A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin vs. interferon alpha-2b and amantadine for treatment of chronic hepatitis C non-responder to interferon monotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interferon-based regimens (alone or with ribavairin) are standard therapies for chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to compare a 24-week regimen of interferon alpha-2b + ribavirin (IFN + RIBA) to interferon alpha-2b + amantadine (IFN + AMANT) in non-responders to previous interferon monotherapy. METHODS: In a multi-center, double-blind clinical trial, 118 patients (non-responders to previous interferon monotherapy) were equally randomized into the two arms: interferon alpha-2b (3 MU thrice weekly) and ribavirin (800 mg daily) vs. interferon alpha-2b (3 MU thrice weekly) and amantadine (200 mg daily). RESULTS: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA became undetectable in 34.8% (95% CI: 23.7-49.2) of IFN + RIBA and 19.6% (95% CI: 10.6-34.7) of IFN + AMANT (P = 0.10). This response was sustained in 3.9% (95% CI: 1.0-14.9) of IFN + RIBA and 0% of IFN + AMANT (P = 0.16). Ten patients from IFN + AMANT (17%) and 12 patients (20%) from IFN + RIBA were discontinued before completion of therapy. Of these, 7% in IFN + AMANT and 12% in IFN + RIBA were discontinued due to adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of interferon non-responders with a 24-week course of IFN + AMANT was not associated with any sustained viral eradication. Although IFN + RIBA in this group was associated with a reasonable end of treatment response, relapses were common and sustained responses were low.     

Combination of ribavirin and interferon-alfa surpasses high doses of interferon-alfa alone in patients with genotype-1b-related chronic hepatitis C

The purpose of this study was to compare interferon-alfa alone (12-month course with high initial doses) with a combination of interferon-alfa and ribavirin in patients infected with genotype 1b. Three hundred and seven patients were randomized into 3 groups to receive 6 mega units (MU) of interferon-alfa-2b subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 6 months followed by 3 MU for 6 months (n = 95, group A); 10 MU for 3 months followed by 6 MU for 3 months, followed by 3 MU for 6 months (n = 83, group B); or the group-A schedule in combination with ribavirin (n = 129, group C) for 4 (n = 46), 6 (n = 44), or 12 months (n = 39). Negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was more frequent in group C than in groups A or B after 3 months of treatment (P <.006), at the end of treatment (P =.017), and at the end of follow-up (32.8%, 16.9%, and 14.1%, respectively, P <.003). A complete response (negative PCR and normal alanine transaminase) was higher in group C than in the other groups and when comparing 12- to 4- and 6-month combination therapy at the end of treatment (P =.05) and of follow-up (45.2% vs. 25.4%, respectively, P =.05). The greater efficacy of the combination was related to the higher rate of primary virological response and also to a decrease in the percentage of breakthrough and of relapse. In 1b-infected patients, the combination of high doses of interferon-alfa (6 MU) and ribavirin for 12 months appears to be the best therapy, with a high rate of sustained response.     

利巴韦林联合不同剂量普通干扰素α-2b治疗基因2、3型慢性丙型肝炎的疗效观察

目的观察利巴韦林（RBV）联合不同剂量干扰素（IFN）OL-2b治疗基因2、3型慢性丙型肝炎的临床疗效。方法将2009年4月至2012年1月收治的46例基因2、3型慢性丙型肝炎患者分为治疗组24例和对照组22例,两组均在第1个月每日肌肉注射IFNα-2b6MU1次;治疗组在第2个月隔日肌肉注射IFNα-2b6MU1次,在第3个月及以后隔日肌肉注射IFNα-2b3MU1次;对照组在第2个月及以后隔日肌肉注射IFNα-2b6MU1次;两组均每日分3次口服RBV900～1200mg,疗程均为6个月;两组获得治疗结束时病毒学应答（ETVR）的患者在疗程结束后6个月时随访;无应答（NR）的患者延长疗程3个月。比较两组治疗后快速病毒学应答（RVR）、早期病毒学应答（EVR）、治疗结束时病毒学应答（ETVR）、无应答（NR）和持久病毒学应答（SVR）情况;比较两组治疗费用和不良反应。计数资料组间比较采用,检验。结果治疗组24例和对照组22例获得RVR、EVR、EVR均较高,分别为15例（62．50％）和13例（59．09％）（X^2=0．056,P〉0．05）、17例（70．83％）和15例（68．18％）（X^2=0．038,P〉0．05）、20例（83．33％）和19例（86．36％）（X^2=0．082,P〉0．05）;治疗组和对照组NR均较低,分别为4例（16．67％）和3例（13．64％）（X^2=0．082,P〉0．05）;治疗组和对照组获得SVR也较高,分别为18例（75．00％）和17例（77．27％）（X^2=0．033,P〉0．05）,差异均无统计学意义。治疗组使用IFNα-2b的总量及治疗费用比对照组少近30％,药物不良反应也较轻。结论RBV联合IFNα-2b“诱导疗法”治疗基因2、3型慢性丙型肝炎可获得较高的RVR、EVR,减少IFN剂量的维持治疗也能获得较高的ETVR和SVR,能减轻患者经济负担和药物不良反应。     

Retreatment with interferon and ribavirin vs interferon alone according to viraemia in interferon responder-relapser hepatitis C patients: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled study

Low pretreatment viral load has consistently been shown to be an independent predictor of sustained response (SR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin vs IFN alone in low viraemic patients (<2 millions copies/mL) who had relapsed to a previous course of IFN and the efficacy of 24 vs 48 week combination therapy in high viraemic patients. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomly assigned to one of the four regimens after stratification on pretreatment viral load. All patients received IFN-alpha2b (6 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks and 3 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks). Patients with low viraemia received either IFN-alpha2b alone for 48 weeks (R1: 42 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin (600 mg/day) for 24 weeks and IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R2: 48 patients). Patients with high viral load received either IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and then IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R3: 104 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks (R4: 103 patients). In low viraemic patients the rate of SR was 37.7% in group R1 and 59.6% in group R2 (P < 0.05). In high viraemic patients, the rate of SR was 44.7% in group R3 and 51.4% in group R4 (P: NS). Thirty-one patients discontinued treatment (10.4%) without difference regarding treatment regimen. In the regimen using ribavirin we found no difference in terms of SR between patients receiving a dose of ribavirin below 10.6 mg/kg/day (55%) or over 10.6 mg/kg/day (58%). Histological improvement occurred in 70.2% of patients regardless of the regimen. Logistic regression showed that genotype 2 and 3, Knodell score <6 and alanine aminotransferase pretreatment level >3 x upper limit of normal were significantly and independently correlated with SR. In low viraemic patients who relapsed to a previous IFN treatment, combination therapy using high-dose IFN and low-dose ribavirin is better than high-dose IFN alone. In high viraemic patients there was no benefit in increasing the duration of combination therapy from 24 to 48 weeks. In this study, it was found that low dose of ribavirin can be used safely and there is no effect of ribavirin dose on SR.     

Efficacy of prolonged 5 million units of interferon in combination with ribavirin for relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C

summary.  Retreatment of relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C with the standard dose of interferon (IFN) of 3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (tiw) plus ribavirin for 24 weeks achieves a sustained response in 30 and 73% of patients with genotype 1 and 2 or 3, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IFN α -2b induction therapy, followed by prolonged treatment with a high dose of IFN α -2b plus ribavirin in relapser patients. A total of 119 patients were randomized to receive IFN α -2b 5 MU daily (Group A: 59 patients) or IFN α -2b 5 MU tiw (Group B: 60 patients) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU tiw) and ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks in both groups. The primary end point was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA clearance at week 24 after the end of treatment. A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 68 and 60% of Group A and B patients, respectively ( P  = 0.37). Logistic regression analysis identified genotype 2 or 3 as the only independent factor associated with response, whereas induction regimen and baseline viraemia levels did not affect the response. The overall SVR was 53 and 72% in patients with genotype 1 or 4 and 2 or 3, respectively. In conclusion, induction IFN therapy does not enhance the SVR to a 48-week combination therapy. Our study suggests that relapsed patients with genotype 1 or 4 may achieve significant response rates of approximately 50%, if retreated with 5 MU tiw IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks.     

Sustained suppression of hepatitis C virus by interferon and ribavirin in hemophilic patients not responding to interferon monotherapy.

Thirty-nine hemophiliac patients, negative for human immunodeficiency virus, with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to interferon (IFN) at 3 million units (MU) given subcutaneously thrice weekly for at least 3 months were retreated with 5 MU IFN for 6 months followed by 3 MU IFN in combination with daily oral doses of 1 or 1.2 g ribavirin. Thirty-four patients (87%) completed the study. In 4 patients treatment was discontinued because of treatment-related symptoms; 1 patient dropped out. Dosage reduction was required in 10 patients (26%) because of ribavirin-related anemia or IFN-related side effects. By intention-to-treat analysis, 14 (37%) had a sustained virologic response with preference for those infected by genotypes other than type 1 (43% versus 12%) and with high transaminases levels (168 U/L versus 116 U/L). Thus, IFN and ribavirin combination therapy led to a sustained suppression of hepatitis in one third of hemophiliac patients resistant to conventional monotherapy.     

Viral kinetics and treatment response in patients with hepatitis C during induction and standard interferon therapy in combination with ribavirin

BACKGROUND: The early decline of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels during therapy may predict the outcome and can be utilized to improve treatment regimens. We studied the HCV RNA levels during induction and standard interferon (IFN) and ribavirin treatment. METHODS: Patients received IFN 3 MU daily for 14 days followed by 3 MU three times a week (induction group; n = 10), or IFN 3 MU three times a week from start (standard group; n = 21), in combination with ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day. HCV RNA was quantified day 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 during treatment, and tested qualitatively at the end of treatment and at follow-up. RESULTS: The initial viral load decline was more pronounced in the induction group, and in patients infected with genotype non-1. The sustained response rate was not significantly different between the study groups. At day 1, the mean viral load decline from baseline was significantly greater in patients who became sustained responders than in those who became non-responders; 1.4 log (96%) versus 0.3 log (55%) (P < 0.05). All sustained responders had a viral load decline of at least 0.7 log (79%) after the first IFN dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our short-term induction treatment did not improve the long-term treatment outcome significantly, although a trend was seen. An absent or low initial viral load decline can be used to predict non-response in the individual patient.     

Retreatment for 24 vs 48 weeks with interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed or did not respond to interferon alone

We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin over 24 or 48 weeks for the retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed or did not respond to a previous course of IFN. One-hundred and twenty patients (69 non-responders and 51 relapsers) were randomly assigned to receive IFN-alpha2b (3 million units thrice weekly) plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg per day) for 24 weeks (group A: 58 patients) or 48 weeks (group B: 62 patients). Treatment was discontinued at week 12 if the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level remained elevated. The rate of sustained response was 15.5% in group A and 37.1% in group B (P = 0.013). Relapsers treated for 48 weeks had a sustained response rate of 66.6% compared with a sustained response rate of only 25% in those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.004). Moreover, a sustained response was seen in 14.3% of non-responders treated for 48 weeks and in 8.8% of those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.71). Fifty-three per cent of patients with a normal ALT level and undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at week 12 had a sustained response compared with 14% of those who were HCV RNA positive at week 12 (P < 0.001). Independent predictive factors of sustained response were: therapy for 48 weeks (P = 0.0026), relapse after IFN treatment (P = 0.0006), loss of HCV RNA at week 12 (P = 0.0008) and HCV genotype non-1 (P = 0.024). Hence, in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to a previous course of IFN monotherapy, combination therapy with IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks seems to be more effective than IFN plus ribavirin for 24 weeks.     

Peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin vs interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected patients

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is associated with low response rates and high incidence of side effects. One hundred twenty-one hepatitis C virus (HCV)-HIV-coinfected patients were randomized to receive interferon alpha-2b (3 MU thrice weekly; n = 61) or peginterferon alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week; n = 60), plus ribavirin (800 mg daily), for 24 (genotype 2 or 3) or 48 weeks (genotype 1 or 4). We assessed early virological response at 4, 8 and 12 weeks to predict sustained virological response (SVR). Safety assessment included frequent blood lactate measurement and relative quantitation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In intention-to-treat analysis, the SVR rate was higher in the peginterferon group (55%vs 26%; P = 0.002). The difference for HCV genotypes 1 and 4 was 45%vs 14% (P = 0.009) and 50%vs 27% (P = 0.387), respectively, and for genotype 2 or 3, 71%vs 43% (P = 0.12) Viral response at 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment was highly predictive of SVR. Among genotype 3 patients, 17 of 20 (85%) whose HCV RNA was already undetectable at 4 weeks had an SVR after 24 weeks of treatment. Hyperlactataemia occurred in 22 patients and was clinically significant in six, two of whom died. mtDNA decreased significantly 4-12 weeks after the start of treatment in patients developing clinically significant hyperlactataemia. Peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin was more effective than interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in HIV-coinfected patients. Frequent monitoring of virological response may be very helpful to optimize treatment compliance, to tailor treatment duration and to minimize side effects.     

Randomized trial of interferon beta-1a with or without ribavirin in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C

The standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, pegylated interferon (IFN) alpha plus ribavirin, results in a sustained virologic response (SVR) in approximately 50%-60% of patients. IFN beta is a potential alternative to IFN alpha. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency and durability of IFN beta and its combination with ribavirin in the na?ve setting of chronic hepatitis C in Asian patients. In the initial randomized, double-blind phase, patients with chronic hepatitis C (n = 257) received 12 weeks of treatment with IFN beta-1a, 44 mug subcutaneously 3 times weekly, or a placebo. In the subsequent open-label phase, placebo nonresponders received 24 weeks of treatment with IFN beta-1a plus ribavirin, whereas patients receiving IFN beta-1a monotherapy received an additional 12 weeks of therapy. The primary outcome variable was SVR, which was defined as negative HCV RNA after weeks 24 and 48. A total of 34 of 128 patients (26.6%) receiving IFN beta-1a achieved an SVR versus 0 of 129 patients (0%) receiving the placebo (P < 0.001). In the IFN beta-1a/ribavirin group, 73 of 127 patients (57.5%) achieved an SVR [P < 0.001 versus IFN beta-1a; the adjusted odds ratio was 4.54 (95% confidence interval: 2.53, 8.13)]. In HCV genotype 1 patients, 37 of 80 patients (46.3%) treated with IFN beta-1a/ribavirin achieved an SVR versus 19 of 85 patients (22.4%) treated with IFN beta-1a (P = 0.001). Conclusion: IFN beta-1a produced a clear antiviral effect in Asian patients with chronic HCV infection. The addition of ribavirin to IFN beta-1a significantly increased the proportion of patients who achieved an SVR versus IFN beta-1a monotherapy.