Beating‐Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Miniaturized Cardiopulmonary Bypass Results in a More Complete Revascularization When Compared to Off‐Pump Grafting

The technique of miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (M‐CPB) for beating‐heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is relatively new and has potential advantages when compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). M‐CPB consists of less tubing length and requires less priming volume. The system is phosphorylcholine coated and results in minimal pump‐related inflammatory response and organ injury. Finally, this technique combines the advantages of the off‐pump CABG (OPCAB) with the better exposure provided by CPB to facilitate complete revascularization. The hypothesis is that CABG with M‐CPB has a better outcome in terms of complete coronary revascularization and perioperative results as that compared to off‐pump CABG (OPCAB). In a retrospective study, 302 patients underwent beating‐heart CABG, 117 (39%) of them with the use of M‐CPB and 185 (61%) with OPCAB. After propensity score matching 62 patients in both groups were demographically similar. The most important intra‐ and early‐postoperative parameters were analyzed. Endpoints were hospital mortality and complete revascularization. Hospital mortality was comparable between the groups. The revascularization was significantly more complete in M‐CPB patients than in patients in the OPCAB group. Beating‐heart CABG with M‐CPB is a safe procedure and it provides an optimal operative exposure with significantly more complete coronary revascularization when compared to OPCAB. Beating‐heart CABG with the support of a M‐CPB is the operation of choice when total coronary revascularization is needed.     

Early results of complete off-pump coronary revascularization using left internal thoracic artery with composite radial artery

Objective: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) using the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) with a composite radial artery (RA) was employed for arterial revascularization in order to minimize neurological complication. Methods: Sixty-one patients underwent OPCAB using the LITA with a composite RA. Angiography was performed in all patients at two weeks postoperatively. Results: The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.2±0.4 A Y-composite graft was used in 55 patients, and K-composite graft was used in the other 6 patients. There was no hospital death, no neurological complication nor deep sternal infection Furthermore, there was no episode of perioperative myocardial infarction nor hypoperfusion syndrome. Patients have been angina-free during a mean follow-up period of 1 year. The graft patency of the LITA to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was 100% (61/61 anastomoses). The RA became occluded in 4 patients, and the patency rate was 95.6% (130/136 anastomoses). String or coronary-coronary bypass resulting from flow competition was observed in the LITA of 6 patients and in the RA of 13 patients. The string of the LITA occurred in the segment distal from the anastomosis with the composite RA. The string or coronary-coronary bypass was observed more often in cases in which the recipient coronary artery had less than 75% stenosis. Conclusion: OPCAB using only the LITA with a composite RA can be successfully and safely performed in patients with multivessel disease. Late postoperative follow-up of the flow competition is necessary to delineate the significance of flow competion.     

Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques -- minithoracotomy or sternotomy?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the best surgical approach in off-pump single vessel revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). METHODS: In 256 patients a single left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to LAD bypass was performed with beating heart techniques through a left anterior minithoracotomy (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB), n=129) or a full sternotomy (off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB), n=127). RESULTS: In the OPCAB group, significantly more severe comorbidities (P=0.001) and redo-operations were noted (P<0.001). Conversion to sternotomy or CPB was necessary in five MIDCAB patients and one OPCAB patient. No cerebrovascular accident was seen in both groups. There was no hospital death in MIDCAB- and two deaths in OPCAB procedures (P=ns). There was a significant reduction in time of surgery (P=0.028) and coronary occlusion (P=0.009) in the OPCAB group. No differences in postoperative ventilation time, ICU stay and length of hospital stay were recorded between groups. Wound infections occurred in six MIDCAB patients (4.7%) and one OPCAB patient (0.8%). Early postoperative reoperation due to graft failure was necessary in three patients after MIDCAB and two patients after OPCAB (P=ns). Confirmed by angiography, the early graft patency rate was 96 and 98%, respectively (P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Both beating heart techniques showed good results with low hospital mortality, low early complications and comparable angiographic results. Nevertheless, MIDCAB is a challenging technique as demonstrated by the longer times of surgery and coronary occlusion with a tendency towards a higher risk of conversion and wound infection. Thus, this technique should only be performed in selected patients with favourable coronary anatomy. Through a sternotomy approach, single vessel revascularization can be performed safely off-pump even in high-risk patients.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass

OBJECTIVES: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart has become popular procedure in cardiac surgery and its initial results appeared favorable. We report our early and mid-term results of off-pump CABG performed at Shin-Tokyo Hospital. METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing off-pump or conventional on-pump CABG from September 1, 1996, to August 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent off-pump CABG were further classified into 2 groups; MIDCAB (Off-pump CABG for single vessel revascularization via a small skin incision) and OPCAB (off-pump CABG mainly approached via midline sternotomy) group. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among a total of 995 cases of CABG, 194 cases were off-pump CABG (male/female 142/52, mean age 66.9). The mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump CABG was 1.9 +/- 0.9 (1.0 +/- 0.0 in MIDCAB and 2.3 +/- 0.7 in OPCAB), which was significantly fewer than in on-pump CABG (3.6 +/- 1.1), with p < 0.0001. Intubation time (5.3 +/- 5.7 hours in off-pump CABG vs 13.1 +/- 24.2 hours in on-pump CABG), ICU stay (1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 3.0 days), and postoperative hospital stay (14.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.1 +/- 12.1 days) in off-pump CABG were significantly shorter than in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001). In the off-pump CABG group, there were no in-hospital deaths and 14 major complications, fewer than in on-pump CABG (8 hospital deaths and 114 major complications). Postoperative angiography before hospital discharge was conducted in 80 patients (41.2%) and showed 2 occlusions, giving a graft patency rate of 98.6% in the off-pump group. During follow-up (0.9 +/- 0.6 year) period, there were 5 non-cardiac deaths and 20 cardiac events in the off-pump group. The actuarial survival rate at 36 months was 94.6% for off-pump CABG, showing no significant difference from the rate for conventional CABG patients (95.2% at 36 month, p = NS) The event-free rate was 84.0% at 36 months in off-pump CABG patients; however, which was less favorable than on-pump CABG patients (88.0% at 36 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both in-hospital and mid-term results for off-pump CABG patients were acceptable. Isolated CABG can thus be safely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Advances in coronary stabilization have contributed to these improved results. The observed long-term cardiac events may be related to incomplete revascularization.     

Initial experience with beating heart surgery: comparison with fast-track methods.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may increase postoperative complications in high-risk patients. The goal of this study is to retrospectively review a series of consecutive patients undergoing conventional CABG using a fast-track recovery method and to compare this series with the initial series of patients undergoing beating heart surgery using either the single-vessel minimally invasive approach or the off-pump multivessel bypass technique with a median sternotomy. One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent CABG. One hundred four patients underwent conventional CABG using CPB with a short-pump fast-track recovery method (Group A). Twenty-nine patients underwent a single-vessel bypass via a left anterior thoracotomy off pump [Group B, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)]. Twenty-five patients underwent multivessel CABG with a median sternotomy off pump (Group C). Short-pump fast-track (Group A) patients exhibited minimal complications and expedient recovery and received extensive revascularization. Off-pump multivessel patients (Group C) received fewer bypass grafts, had more preoperative comorbidity, and recovered as quickly as lower-risk fast-track short-pump patients (Group A). Single-vessel off-pump patients (Group B, MIDCAB) were younger elective patients and demonstrated no recovery advantage. The overall mortality was 1.8 per cent. The conversion rates from beating heart surgery to CPB for groups B and C were 10.3 and 16 per cent, respectively. The postoperative hospital length of stay for groups A, B, and C were 4.8+/-2.4, 3.9+/-1.8, and 5.2+/-2.3 days, respectively. Eliminating CPB is not as important as reducing exposure for minimizing operative risk. Beating heart surgery is an adjunct to conventional CABG with CPB. The off-pump multivessel bypass technique is best suited for high-risk patients requiring three grafts or fewer, whereas MIDCAB is best suited for single-vessel bypass that cannot be managed using interventional percutaneous techniques; however, the recovery advantage with MIDCAB is not apparent. Patients requiring more than three bypass grafts should undergo conventional CABG with CPB.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results.

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. METHODS: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p = 0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p = 0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p = 0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p = 0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Rationale of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for left main trunk disease

Objective: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) remains controversial in patients with left main trunk (LMT) disease because of a concern about the ability to tolerate hemodynamic instability. This study examined the safety of OPCAB for LMT disease compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Between April 1997 and December 2002, 257 consecutive patients with LMT stenosis who underwent CABG were enrolled. There were 98 patients who received CABG with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (CCAB group), and 159 patients who received OPCAB (OPCAB group). Results: There was no patient who converted to on-pump intraoperatively due to hemodynamic instability. Both intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion incidence were lower in the OPCAB group. Postoperative course was similar, however, pulmonary complications were less observed postoperatively in the OPCAB group. No hypoperfusion syndrome was seen postoperatively in both groups. The average number of anastomosis was 3.2±1.1 in the CCAB group and 3.2±1.0 in the OPCAB group (p=0.645). Total arterial OPCAB with an aorta no-touch technique was achieved in 142 patients (89.3%) in OPCAB group. Postoperative angiography was performed in 95 patients in CCAB (96.9%), and in 141 patients in OPCAB (89.8%). Although graft patency of arterial grafts was good in both groups (100% in CCAB and 98.3% in OPCAB), saphenous vein graft patency was slightly lower in both groups (93.4% in CCAB and 76.5% in OPCAB) compared with arterial grafts. Conclusion: OPCAB allows a safe and effective treatment of LMT disease.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results

Objective: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. Methods: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p=0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p=0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p=0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p=0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p=0.026). Conclusions: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting/beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient with low left ventricular ejection fraction

Beating coronary artery bypass grafting could be performed for a 47-year-old man with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 9.3%. Post-operative LVEF was improved to 51.6%. Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) used to be contraindicative for patients with LVEF below 20%. Recently, such patients are involved to indication of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) or beating CABG, because we consider OPCAB are lower complications than conventional CABG. We were able to bypass the circumflex for the patient while we had been used percutaneous cardio-pulmonary support (PCPS). We could perform beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient of the low LVEF.     

Minimally Invasive Multiple Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Composite Graft Using in situ Right Gastroepiploic and Radial Arteries

Minimally invasive surgery/coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) via left thoracotomy and multiple CABG is a reported alternative to the standard sternotomy approach. However, harvesting the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) under direct vision requires high surgical skill. We describe MICS CABG with the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and a composite graft using the in situ right gastroepiploic artery (GEA) and radial artery (RA) to achieve complete coronary revascularization. No complications occurred, and postoperative computed tomography showed patency of all grafts. Our experience suggests that this composite graft can be used safely and effectively in MICS CABG for complete arterial revascularization without difficulty.     

Rationale for off-pump coronary revascularization to small branches--angiographic study of 1,283 anastomoses in 408 patients

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has gained wide acceptance in tandem with the development of the stabilizer and associated operative techniques. However bypass grafting to the small branches of a beating heart is technically demanding and remains controversial. In the present study we evaluated the graft patency and quality of anastomoses to small coronary arteries by early postoperative angiography. METHODS: Between March 2000 and December 2002 a total of 1,328 anastomosed sites to coronary branches were studied angiographically in 404 patients representing 88.6% of all cases who underwent OPCAB in this period. The coronary artery branches were categorized as large (>1.5 mm, group L: 1,028 anastomoses sites) or small (< 1.5 mm, group S: 300 sites) by intraoperative measurement. As in situ grafts the internal thoracic artery (ITA) and the gastroepiploic artery (GEA) were used at 504 and 28 distal anastomosis sites respectively. The radial artery (RA) was used as a composite graft for 739 distal anastomosis sites. Sequential bypass grafting was performed at 388 anastomosis sites in side-to-side fashion. Arterial grafts were used in 96.1% of total bypass grafting. RESULTS: The percentage of male gender was 78.3% in group S and 87.2% in group L (p = 0.025). The ITA was used in 43.7% of group L and 18.3% of group S (p < 0.0001). The RA was used in 49.4% of group L and 77% of group S (p < 0.0001). The overall patency and stenosis free rates (FitzGibbon Type A) were 97.2% and 96.2%. Graft patency and stenosis free rates in group S (96.7% and 93.3%) were as good as those in group L (97.5% and 97.1%). In group S, the patency and stenosis free rates of SV grafts were 71.4% and 57.1%. On the other hand, those of ITA grafts were 100% and 98.3% (p = 0.53 vs. saphenous vein graft [SVG]) and RA grafts were 95.8% and 92.1% (p = 0.61 vs. SVG) respectively. In group S, the graft patency and stenosis free rates of bypass to the obtuse marginal (OM) (93.7% and 87.5%) were slightly lower than those to other implantation sites left anterior descending (LAD: 100% and 97.3%; PL: 96.5% and 92.3%; DI: 98.0% and 96%; PDA: 97.0% and 97.0%; right coronary artery [RCA]: 100% and 100%) although there was no statistical significance. The graft patency and stenosis free rates were slightly better with side-to-side anastomosis than with end-to-side anastomosis (side-to-side: 98.1% and 95.8% vs. end-to-side 96.3% and 86.3%) in group S. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB to small coronary artery branches with arterial grafts provided satisfactory graft patency and stenosis free rates.     

Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: Coronary bypass surgery that provides good long-term graft patency can be performed on the beating heart as a viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: From September 1993 to December 1996, 696 patients underwent CABG on the beating heart at the Ko?uyolu Heart and Research Hospital in Istanbul. Among them, 70 patients were chosen randomly for angiographic assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: The interval from operation to angiography varied from 24 to 61 months (mean, 36.1+/-10.9 months). The patency rate of left internal mammary-left anterior descending artery anastomoses was 95.59% (patency achieved in 65 of 68 patients) and of vein grafts was 47.06% (patency achieved in 16 of 34 patients) (p < 0.0001). The patency rates of grafts anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery were significantly higher than the rates of the grafts anastomosed to the other coronary arteries (95.71% versus 45.45%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that graft type (p < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (p = 0.023) were significant predictors for graft occlusion. Left ventricular function improved significantly after CABG (p = 0.04). Reintervention (using percutaneous transluminal cardiac angioplasty) and reoperation rates were 0.97% and 1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting appears to produce midterm and long-term patency rates that are comparable to those of conventional techniques; that is especially true in cases of arterial conduits and of conduits anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass may decrease the patency of saphenous vein grafts

BACKGROUND: There is concern that a hypercoagulable status is caused after coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, or OPCAB) and may potentially endanger the patency of the anastomosis. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare 1-year graft patency after OPCAB with that of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and that of on-pump beating CABG; and (2) to demonstrate any differences in patency of various conduits among the three groups. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 122 consecutive OPCAB cases (group 1) compared with those of 65 consecutive conventional CABG cases (group II) and those of 19 consecutive on-pump beating CABG cases (group III). In group I, coronary angiography (CAG) was performed immediately postoperatively and 1 year after surgery. In groups II and III, CAG was performed 1 year after surgery. Graft patency was graded as grade A (excellent), grade B (fair), or grade O (occluded). RESULTS: The average number of distal anastomoses in groups I, II, and III were 3.1 +/- 1.1, 3.7 +/- 0.9, and 3.6 +/- 0.9, respectively. In group I, postoperative CAG was performed in 92% of patients (112/122) before discharge. The patency rate (grade A + B) was 96.4% (162/168) for arterial grafts, and 85.6% (160/187) for saphenous vein grafts (SVG). One-year follow-up CAG was performed in 74% of patients (90/122). The patency rate was 97.8% (132/135) for arterial grafts and 67.9% (106/156) for SVG. In group II, 1-year follow-up CAG was performed in 65% of patients (42/65). The patency rate (grade A + B) was 93.5% (43/46) for arterial grafts and 88.3% (98/111) for SVG. In group III, 1-year follow-up CAG was performed in 89% of patients (17/19). The patency rate (grade A + B) was 100% (19/19) for arterial grafts and 86.8% (33/38) for SVG. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the patency rate ot SVG after OPCAB was significantly lower than that of arterial grafts in the early postoperative CAG (p < 0.001), and was also significantly lower than those of SVG of group II (p < 0.001) and group III (p < 0.01) in the postoperative 1-year CAG, although there was no significant difference in 1-year patency of arterial grafts among the three groups. Our data suggest that a specific perioperative anticoagulant therapy may be advisable in patients undergoing OPCAB with SVG.     

High thoracic epidural anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting using two different surgical approaches in conscious patients

Recent developments in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass made the sole use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) in conscious patients feasible. Previously, TEA has been reported only for single-vessel CABG via lateral thoracotomy. We investigated the feasibility and complications of sole TEA in 20 patients undergoing beating-heart arterial revascularization via partial lower sternotomy for single-vessel disease (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting [MIDCAB] technique; n = 10) or complete median sternotomy for multivessel disease (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting [OPCAB] technique; n = 10). An epidural catheter was inserted at the T1-2 or T2-3 interspace. An epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.5% and sufentanil 1.66 micro g/mL was started to establish anesthetic levels at C5-6 for OPCAB and at T1-2 for MIDCAB. Nine OPCAB and eight MIDCAB procedures were completed while patients were awake and spontaneously breathing during the entire procedure. Because of surgical pneumothorax (OPCAB), insufficient anesthesia, or phrenic nerve palsy (both MIDCAB), three patients required intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia. The heart rate decreased significantly (P < 0.05) by 10%-15% in both groups during the procedure. Compared with baseline (B), mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg) was decreased significantly only during coronary anastomosis (CA) (B(OPCAB), 95 +/- 11; CA(OPCAB), 68 +/- 9; B(MIDCAB), 86 +/- 10; CA(MIDCAB), 73 +/- 10; P not significant between groups). PaCO(2) increased from 42 +/- 2 mm Hg to 46 +/- 7 mm Hg (P < 0.05) throughout the perioperative course during OPCAB, whereas it remained almost unaltered during MIDCAB procedures. All patients rated TEA as "good" or "excellent." In conclusion, we demonstrated that the sole use of TEA for MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures was feasible and provided a high degree of patient satisfaction in our small and highly selected cohorts. IMPLICATIONS. The sole use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia was studied in 20 patients who underwent beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting using either median or partial lower sternotomy while awake.     

Gastroepiploic artery free graft for coronary bypass

The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the graft of choice for CABG but has a limited number and length. For multivessel coronary disease, saphenous vein grafts have to be added but they show poorer long-term patency. Investigation to provide adjunctive reliable grafts has recently focussed on the right gastroepiploic artery (GEA) and encouraging results have been reported employing this vessel as a pedicled graft to bypass distal coronary vessels. From December 1988 to February 1989, to achieve complete myocardial revascularization with only arterial grafts we used a GEA free graft in combination with the two IMAs in 20 consecutive patients under 70 years of age undergoing elective surgery. Before starting, histological studies were carried out and a significant similarity between IMA and GEA was found. In the 20 patients, 76 coronary anastomoses were performed (3.8 bypasses/patient), the GEA graft revascularized the right coronary artery in 9 patients, the circumflex in 8 patients and the anterior descending and/or diagonal in 3 patients; in 7 patients the GEA graft was used for sequential anastomoses. No perioperative deaths, no myocardial infarctions and no gastroenterological complications occurred. Coronary angiographic postoperative control showed 20/20 patent GEA grafts. After follow-up ranging from 7 to 9 months, all patients are free from angina. The GEA free graft is not difficult to harvest, is easier than the pedicled GEA graft to handle in the pericardium and is suitable for sequential anastomoses. The use of GEA graft however increases the complexity of bypass operations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A method for determining an appropriate length of gastroepiploic artery graft in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

The gastroepiploic artery (GEA) is available as a graft to the right coronary artery (RCA). However, it is hard to determine an optimal anastomotic site and GEA graft length after upsetting the heart in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). To solve these problems, we traced a target coronary tree on the diaphragm and marked an optimal anastomotic site by skin markers. A small incision was made on the diaphragm at the proximal site of the optimal anastomotic position. Appropriate length of GEA graft was determined according to the schema on the diaphragm. By postoperative coronary angiogram performed in 22 cases (25 anastomoses), 22 anastomoses proved patent (88.0%). Flow competition of GEA-4 posterior descending artery (PD) was observed in 2 anastomoses (8.0%). Occlusion of 4PD-4 atrioventricular node artery (AV) sequential portion was observed in 1 anastomosis (4.0%). There was no angulated, redundant or tense graft in any of the patent grafts. This method was suggested to be useful in determining an optimal anastomotic site and GEA graft length.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison between standard CABG and off-pump CABG

We have performed 321 cases of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), between October 15 1995 and November 20 2000. We have evaluated the operative results of 142 cases (44.2%) of conventional CABG and 179 cases (55.8%) of off-pump CABG performed during this period. The average numbers of bypassed grafts was 3.53 for conventional CABG, and 1.62 for off-pump CABG. The total number of 369 grafts were anastomosed to 501 coronary arteries for conventional CABG, and 283 grafts were anastomosed to 290 coronary arteries for off-pump CABG. RESULTS: Although two saphenous veins were occluded, the early postoperative patency rate was 100% for conventional CABG using RITA, LITA, GEA and RA. Three site of stenosis in 18 LITAs and 2 in 16 RITAs were recognized in off-pump CABG without the use of stabilizers. One site of stenosis in 130 LITAs and 3 string signs in 44 GEA were recognized in off-pump CABG with the use of stabilizers. Postoperative angiography in 52 off-pump CABG cases at one year later showed no new lesion. CONCLUSION: The use of stabilizers and LIMA suture enables adaptation of the MIDCAB procedure to a wider range of coronary artery bypass procedures, and a higher graft patency can be expected.     

Comparison of standard coronary artery bypass grafting and minimary invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Early and mid-term result.

OBJECTIVES: We studied indications and problems involved in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB). METHODS: We compared patients profiles, graft patency, stenosis severity, morbidity, mortality, long-term survival and freedom from cardiac accidents in 174 patients undergoing elective standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 128 undergoing between January 1996 and March 1999. RESULTS: No statistically difference was seen in gender, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, multi-vessel disease ratios, or left main trunk stenosis between 2 groups. Internal thoracic artery graft patency was 97% (114/118) and the rate of anastomotic stenosis (> 50%) was 9% (10/118) compared to 96% (213/221) in the MIDCAB group. The 3-year survival rate was 91% in the MIDCAB group and 92% in the CABG group and freedom from cardiac accidents, most involving pericutaneus transluminal coronary angioplasty retreatment, was 66% in the MIDCAB group and 88% in the CABG group. CONCLUSION: Although patency and stenosis incidence did not differ between 2 groups, freedom from cardiac accidents was lower in the MIDCAB group.     

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study

Objective: The minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) operation performed via a small thoracotomy has not previously been examined in a direct comparison to sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods: We matched, according to age, gender, left ventricular function, and median number of distal anastomoses, 150 patients who underwent MICS CABG via small left thoracotomy, and 150 patients who received sternotomy OPCAB. All operations were performed by the same surgeon. Results: There was no perioperative mortality (0/300). In the MICS CABG group, pump assistance was used in 28/150 (19%) patients, and conversion to sternotomy occurred in 10/150 (6.7%) patients. In the OPCAB group, conversion to on-pump occurred in 3/150 (2.0%) patients. There were four (2.7%) reoperations for bleeding and one (0.7%) for anastomotic revision in each group. The median hospital length of stay was 5 days for MICS CABG (average 5.4), and 6 days for OPCAB (average 7.2) (P = 0.02). New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 35 (23%) MICS CABG patients and in 42 (28%) OPCAB patients (P = 0.3). No wound infection occurred with MICS CABG versus six (4.0%) with OPCAB (P = 0.03). A self-limiting left pleural effusion developed in 22 (15%) MICS CABG patients and in six (4.0%) OPCAB patients (P = 0.002). The median time to return to full physical activity was 12 days in MICS CABG patients versus >5 weeks in OPCAB patients (P < 0.001). Conclusions: MICS CABG is a valuable alternative for patients in need of multivessel CABG. The operation appears at least as safe as OPCAB, and associated with shorter hospital length of stay, less wound infections, and faster postoperative recovery than OPCAB.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with gastroepiploic artery composite graft

BACKGROUND: To achieve better results after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), arterial conduits are the first choice in multiple CABG for younger patients. We present here the early results of CABG with gastroepiploic artery (GEA) composite graft with free radial artery (RA) to revascularize right coronary artery or left circumflex artery in addition to internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery. METHODS: Between July 1997 and June 1998, 13 patients received CABG with GEA (larger caliber than 2.0 mm) composite graft. We have assessed the early results. RESULTS: There was no postoperative death or major morbidity. Postoperative angiogram was performed in 11 patients and all conduits were patent. Postoperative exercise stress test was done in 13 cases and showed no ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple CABG with arterial conduit can be performed by this procedure. The free RA functioned from secondary branches derived from proximal GEA. In conclusion, this procedure seems to be safe and effective, and both long-term patency and better quality of life may be expected.