Inappropriate prescribing for the elderly: beers criteria-based review

OBJECTIVE: To review currently available literature applying the Beers criteria for inappropriate medication use in the elderly to prescribing practices in various settings. DATA SOURCE: Key words including inappropriate, Beers, medication, prescribing, elderly, geriatric, and criteria were used to search MEDLINE records from January 1992 to June 1999. DATA EXTRACTION: Eight relevant studies were found that applied the Beers criteria in various healthcare settings. DATA SYNTHESIS: Each study was examined for methodologic issues, criteria used, prevalence, nature and extent of inappropriate medication use, and factors associated with their use. Despite the methodologic differences, the review revealed some consistent patterns across healthcare settings. This review has shown that: (1) most of the researchers modified the Beers criteria to examine inappropriate medication use in the elderly; (2) studies using patient-based prevalence showed that between nearly one in four (23.5%) and one in seven (14.0%) elderly patients received an inappropriate medication as defined by either the Beers list of 20 inappropriate medications or the Modified Beers list; (3) the majority of these patients received one inappropriate agent; and (4) long-acting benzodiazepines, dipyridamole, propoxyphene, and amitriptyline were among the most frequently prescribed inappropriate medications. Univariate analyses indicated that women, patients >80 years old, and Medicaid patients appeared to receive more inappropriate medications than others; however, multivariate analyses found that only a higher number of medications was consistently associated with inappropriate medication use. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate prescribing or use trends are noteworthy because they were observed despite methodologic differences. The findings can be instrumental in developing targeted interventions to influence future prescribing practices. More research is needed to address the national trends and healthcare impact of inappropriate drug use in the elderly.     

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in elderly: assessing doctor knowledge,confidence and barriers

Introduction Inappropriate medication prescribing by doctors is an important preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. This study investigates doctor knowledge about potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in elderly, their confidence in prescribing for the elderly and explores perceived barriers. Methods Family and Internal Medicine resident and attending doctors at three teaching hospitals were asked to complete a survey. Six clinical vignettes based on the 2003 Beers criteria were used to evaluate doctor knowledge about medications to avoid in the elderly. Confidence in prescribing for the elderly and perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing in elderly was assessed using a 5‐point Likert scale. Results Eighty‐nine doctors completed the survey, for a response rate of 45%. Forty‐four per cent of surveyed doctors estimated that over 25% of their practice consisted of patients 65 years or older. When knowledge of PIP was assessed via vignettes, the mean correct response was 3.9 (SD: 1.1, min = 1, max = 6). Only 14% of those doctors scoring ≤4 vignettes correctly had used the Beers criteria for prescribing; 31% of the doctors answering ≥5 vignettes correctly had used the Beers criteria (P = 0.08). Overall, 75% of doctors felt confident about their prescribing irrespective of their knowledge scores. Seventy per cent of surveyed doctors cited at least seven different barriers to appropriate prescribing in elderly. Conclusions Many primary care doctors possess a poor knowledge of PIP and are unaware of prescribing guidelines such as the Beers criteria. Our survey indicates that doctor usage of the Beers criteria might correlate with improved judgement in prescribing for the elderly. Most doctors report multiple barriers to appropriate prescribing in the elderly. Lack of formal education about prescribing guidelines was the only barrier that correlated with the doctors' level of training.     

Adverse outcomes associated with inappropriate drug use in nursing homes

BACKGROUND: Little empirical evidence exists regarding the influence and outcomes of inappropriate medication use among elderly nursing home residents. OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of inappropriate medication use among elderly patients in Georgia nursing homes using the Beers criteria and identify the relationship between inappropriate drug use and the likelihood of an adverse health outcome. METHODS: A cohort design was used to review 1117 patient medical records in 15 Georgia nursing homes with a high risk of polypharmacy. Prevalence of inappropriate medication use among elderly patients, as defined by the Beers criteria, was estimated. The adverse health outcomes of hospitalizations, emergency department visits, or deaths were identified from Medicaid claims data. RESULTS: A total of 519 (46.5%) patients received at least one inappropriate medication and 143 (12.8%) patients experienced at least one adverse health outcome. Logistic regression revealed that the total number of medications taken (OR 1.139, 95% CI 1.105 to 1.173) significantly increased the likelihood of receiving an inappropriate drug, while having a diagnosis of "dementia" (OR 0.748, 95% CI 0.565 to 0.991) decreased the likelihood. Inappropriate medication use increased the likelihood of experiencing at least one adverse health outcome more than twofold (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.40). Propoxyphene use alone was significantly associated with the occurrence of an adverse health outcome (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.71). CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate drug use was common in our study cohort. Inappropriate use of medication in the elderly, particularly propoxyphene, is associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes.     

Appropriate medication prescribing in elderly patients: how knowledgeable are primary care physicians? A survey study in Parma,Italy

What is known and Objective: Increasing attention is being paid to inappropriate medication prescribing for the elderly. A growing body of studies have detected a prevalence of inappropriate prescribing ranging from 12% to 40% worldwide, including Regione Emilia‐Romagna, Italy. To improve quality of prescribing, a multi‐phase pilot project in the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Parma, Regione Emilia‐Romagna, was established. This phase aimed to assess primary care physicians’ knowledge of appropriate prescribing in elderly patients. Methods: In total, 155 primary care physicians (51% of the total), convened by the LHU of Parma for an educational session, were asked to complete anonymously a 19‐item paper survey. Knowledge of inappropriate medication use in the elderly was assessed using seven clinical vignettes based on the 2002 Beers Criteria. Topics tested included hypertension, osteoarthritis, arrhythmias, insomnia and depression. Data regarding physician’s perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing for elderly patients were also collected. To evaluate the relationship between physician knowledge scores and physician characteristics, physicians were classified as having a ‘low score’ (three or below) or a ‘high score’ (six or more) with respect to their knowledge of prescribing for the elderly. Results and Discussion: All physicians completed the survey. Most physicians (88%) felt confident in their ability to prescribe appropriate medications for the elderly. Thirty‐nine physicians (25%) received a ‘high score’ compared to 26 (17%) who received a ‘low score’. ‘Lower score’ respondents had been in practice for a longer time (P < 0·05) than ‘higher score’ respondents. Perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing included potential drug interactions (79% of respondents) and the large number of medications a patient is already taking (75%). What is new and Conclusion: The study results show an unsatisfactory knowledge of appropriate prescribing among primary care physicians in the LHU of Parma, especially among older physicians. Educational strategies tailored to primary care physicians should be establish to enhance knowledge in this area and improve quality of prescribing.     

Appropriate prescribing in the elderly: an investigation of two screening tools, Beers criteria considering diagnosis and independent of diagnosis and improved prescribing in the elderly tool to identify inappropriate use of medicines in the elderly in primary care in Ireland

Background:  Elderly patients are particularly vulnerable to inappropriate prescribing, with increased risk of adverse drug reactions and consequently higher rates of morbidity and mortality. A large proportion of inappropriate prescribing is preventable by adherence to prescribing guidelines, suitable monitoring and regular medication review. As a result, screening tools have been developed to help clinicians improve their prescribing.
Objectives:  To compare identification rates of inappropriate prescribing in elderly patients in primary care using two validated screening tools: Beers' criteria and improved prescribing in the elderly tool (IPET); to calculate the net ingredient cost (NIC) per month (€) of the potentially inappropriate medicines in this population of patients.
Method:  A consecutive cohort of 500 patients 65 years of age and over were recruited prospectively from primary care over a 6 month period in a provincial town in Ireland. Patients' medical records (electronic and paper) were screened and all relevant information concerning current illnesses and medications was recorded on a standardized data collection form to which Beers' criteria [considering diagnosis (CD) and independent of diagnosis (ID)] and IPET tools were applied. The NIC was calculated from an edition of the Irish monthly index of medical specialities published concurrently with the data collection.
Results:  Beers' criteria identified a total of 69 medicines that were prescribed inappropriately (eight CD and 61 ID) in 65 patients (13%), costing €824·88 per month while IPET identified 63 potentially inappropriate medicines in 52 (10·4%) patients costing €381·28 per month.
Conclusions:  Potentially inappropriate medications are prescribed in a significant proportion of elderly people in primary care, with significant economic implications.     

Factors influencing the use of potentially inappropriate medication in older patients in Slovakia

Background: Although increasing attention has been given to the evaluation of use of potentially inappropriate medication in the older European Union (EU) member countries, information on this topic from Central and Eastern Europe is scarce. Objectives: The aims of the present study were: to identify risk factors enhancing the probability of use of potentially inappropriate medication in hospitalized older patients under the conditions of the Slovak healthcare system and to compare our results with previously published European studies. Methods: The evaluation was performed in 600 patients aged ≥65 years, hospitalized in a general hospital between 1 December 2003 and 31 March 2005. To identify the use of potentially inappropriate medication, the Beers 2003 criteria were applied. Particular socio‐demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as comorbid medical conditions were evaluated among possible factors enhancing the probability of use of potentially inappropriate medication. Results: At least one potentially inappropriate medication was prescribed to 126 (21%) of 600 patients. Multivariate analysis identified polypharmacy [odds ratio (OR) 2·38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·50–3·79], depression (OR 2·03; 95% CI: 1·08–3·82), immobilization (OR 1·87; 95% CI: 1·16–3·00) and heart failure (OR 1·73; 95% CI: 1·13–2·64) as factors associated with an increased risk of use of inappropriate medication. In contrast, patients aged ≥75 years had a lower risk of being prescribed potentially inappropriate medication (OR 0·58; 95% CI: 0·39–0·88). Conclusions: Polypharmacy, immobilization, heart failure and depression were documented as predictors of use of potentially inappropriate medication. In depressive patients, drugs other than antidepressants contributed to the extensive use of potentially inappropriate medication. The observed prevalence of use of potentially inappropriate medication in older hospitalized Slovak patients was lower than the prevalence previously documented in Poland and the Czech Republic, but higher than in Croatia and Turkey. The identified risk factors were consistent with previous findings from other parts of Europe.     

Conflicts and concordance between measures of medication prescribing quality

BACKGROUND: Several instruments commonly are used to assess the quality of medication prescribing. However, little is known about the relationship between these instruments or the concordance of their quality assessments when applied to the same group of patients. METHODS: We assessed 3 indicators of prescribing quality in a cohort of 196 veterans age 65 and older who were taking 5 or more medications. These 3 indicators assessed whether each patient was (1) taking any medication from the drugs-to-avoid criteria of Beers et al, (2) taking any medication with a score of 3 or more on the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), and/or (3) taking 9 or more medications (polypharmacy). Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement between measures. RESULTS: Mean age was 74.6 years, and patients used a mean of 8.1 medications. Six percent of drugs were rated inappropriate by the Beers drugs-to-avoid criteria, whereas 23% of drugs received an MAI score of 3 or more. Overall agreement between these metrics was 78%, little more than expected by chance (kappa statistic 0.14, P<0.01). At the level of the patient, the proportion of subjects taking one or more inappropriate drugs was 37% by drugs-to-avoid criteria and 82% by MAI, whereas 37% had polypharmacy of >or=9 drugs. Prescribing was classified as inappropriate by all 3 metrics in 18% of patients and as appropriate by all 3 metrics in 13%. Together, this level of agreement was slightly better than chance (3-way kappa statistic 0.08, P=0.03). Agreement remained low in sensitivity analyses using different cutoffs for the Beers criteria, a range of thresholds for MAI scores, and different definitions of polypharmacy, with kappa statistics相似文献   

Impact of a self-administration of medications programme on elderly inpatients' competence to manage medications: a pilot study

What is known and objectives: Changes to medication regimens and failure to involve patients in management of their medications whilst in hospital may result in medication errors or non‐adherence at home after discharge. Self‐administration of medications programmes (SAMP) have been used to address this issue. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a SAMP on elderly hospital inpatients’ competence to manage medications and their medication adherence behaviours. Methods: The SAMP comprised three stages: education, progressing to supervised self‐administration and finally to independent self‐administration. Decisions to progress patients to the next level, and whether they passed or failed the SAMP, were made by the ward pharmacist and nursing staff. The Drug Regimen Unassisted Grading Scale (DRUGS) was used to assess patients’ competence to manage medications at various time points. Tablet count and the Tool for Adherence Behaviour Screening (TABS) were used as adherence measures. Results and discussion: Participants (n = 24) with a mean age of 77·4 years, were mainly female and generally had a high level of functioning. They were prescribed a mean of 9·0 medications at the time of commencing the SAMP. Twenty‐two of the 24 participants successfully completed the SAMP. DRUGS scores at discharge improved significantly (P < 0·001) compared with that before commencement of medication self‐administration. Participants reported a significant decrease (P = 0·02) in non‐adherent behaviour and a trend towards improved adherent behaviour (P = 0·08) after participation in the SAMP. What is new and conclusion: An inpatient SAMP improved elderly patients’ ability to competently manage and adhere to their prescribed medications regimen. This finding needs to be confirmed in a larger controlled trial.     

Potential adverse drug events in an indigent and homeless geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential adverse drug events (ADEs) in a geriatric ambulatory population using the modified Beers criteria. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of an indigent and homeless geriatric population served by a network of six primary healthcare clinics with clinical pharmacy services. Medical records of patients > or = 65 years old visiting the clinics between December 1999 and April 2000 were retrospectively reviewed by a clinical pharmacist. Medications meeting the modfied Beers criteria were evaluated for the most common drug classes involved, severity potential, and dose or disease state restrictions. Following the identification of medications meeting Beers criteria, the pharmacist left a written recommendation regarding use of alternative drugs or doses in the medical record. Physician acceptance of pharmacy recommendations was also evaluated. RESULTS: Medical records of 146 patients (71.9% women, average age 72.6 +/- 6.7 y) were reviewed. Overall, 52 patients (35.6%) had 70 medications with the potential for causing an ADE based on the modified Beers criteria The most commonly identified medication classes were narcotic analgesics (20.0%), antihypertensives (20.0%), and antihistamines (14.3%). Fifteen of these medications (21.4%) had a high severity potential. Identified medications met the following modified Beers criteria: 41.4% were inappropriate in a specific disease state, 38.6% were inappropriate for the elderly, 10.0% exceeded maximum dosage guidelines, and 10.0% were inappropriate for both the elerly and the patients disease state. Approximately 60% of pharmacy recommendations were accepted by physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Beers criteria are a useful tool for reviewing medical records to identify potential ADEs in an ambulatory geriatric population.