Losartan versus atenolol on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. A LIFE substudy

Objective. The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study showed that losartan-based treatment reduced risk of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, stroke and myocardial infarction compared with atenolol-based treatment in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy with similar office blood pressure (BP) reduction. Our aim was to investigate the effect of losartan- and atenolol-based treatment on 24-h ambulatory BP and heart rate (HR) in LIFE. Methods: In 110 patients, 24-h ambulatory BP and heart rate were recorded at baseline and 1 year after randomization. Results: Ambulatory BP was comparably reduced throughout the 24-h period after 1 year of losartan- vs atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment. Office and ambulatory BP were comparably reduced in the follow-up period. Early morning surge in BP was similar between groups. Non-dipping status was more frequent in the losartan group (p = 0.01). From baseline to Year 1 the 24-h HR profile for the losartan group was unchanged, but, as expected, there was a significant decrease in daytime HR in the atenolol group, which was not as large during early night-time. Conclusion: There were no differences in 24-h BP burden and HR that could explain the difference in outcome in favor of losartan vs atenolol in the LIFE study.     

Comparison of randomization techniques for clinical trials with data from the HOMERUS-trial

Background. Several methods of randomization are available to create comparable intervention groups in a study. In the HOMERUS-trial, we compared the minimization procedure with a stratified and a non-stratified method of randomization in order to test which one is most appropriate for use in clinical hypertension trials. A second objective of this article was to describe the baseline characteristics of the HOMERUS-trial. Methods. The HOMERUS population consisted of 459 mild-to-moderate hypertensive subjects (54% males) with a mean age of 55 years. These patients were prospectively randomized with the minimization method to either the office pressure (OP) group, where antihypertensive treatment was based on office blood pressure (BP) values, or to the self-pressure (SP) group, where treatment was based on self-measured BP values. Minimization was compared with two other randomization methods, which were performed post-hoc: (i) non-stratified randomization with four permuted blocks, and (ii) stratified randomization with four permuted blocks and 16 strata. In addition, several factors that could influence outcome were investigated for their effect on BP by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Results. Minimization and stratified randomization did not lead to significant differences in 24-h ABPM values between the two treatment groups. Non-stratified randomization resulted in a significant difference in 24-h diastolic ABPM between the groups. Factors that caused significant differences in 24-h ABPM values were: region, centre of patient recruitment, age, gender, microalbuminuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and obesity. Conclusion. Minimization and stratified randomization are appropriate methods for use in clinical trials. Many outcome factors should be taken into account for their potential influence on BP levels. Recommendation. Due to the large number of potential outcome factors that can influence BP levels, minimization should be the preferred method for use in clinical hypertension trials, as it has the potential to randomize more outcome factors than stratified randomization.     

Isolated nocturnal hypertension and arterial stiffness in a Chinese population

OBJECTIVE: We reported previously that normotensive Chinese had higher nighttime diastolic blood pressure (BP) compared with non-Chinese. We, therefore, studied the prevalence and characteristics of isolated nocturnal hypertension and its association with arterial stiffness, an intermediate sign of target organ damage. METHODS: We recorded ambulatory BP, the central and peripheral systolic augmentation indexes, the ambulatory arterial stiffness index, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in 677 Chinese enrolled in the JingNing population study (53.6% women; mean age: 47.6 years). RESULTS: The prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension (> or = 120/70 mmHg from 22 : 00 to 4 : 00 h) was 10.9%. Patients with isolated nocturnal hypertension, compared with participants with ambulatory normotension (45.8%), were older (53.7 vs. 40.7 years), more often reported alcohol intake (68.9 vs. 51.0%), and had faster nighttime pulse rate (62.8 vs. 60.7 bpm), higher serum cholesterol (5.12 vs. 4.77 mmol/l), and higher blood glucose (4.84 vs. 4.38 mmol/l). They also had higher indexes of arterial stiffness (P<0.05) than participants with ambulatory normotension. Of 74 patients with isolated nocturnal hypertension, only four (5.4%) had hypertension on conventional office BP measurement (> or = 140/90 mmHg). CONCLUSION: Isolated nocturnal hypertension can only be diagnosed by ambulatory BP monitoring, is prevalent among Chinese, and is associated with increased arterial stiffness.     

Isolated ambulatory hypertension is common in outpatients referred to a hypertension centre

The present investigation was aimed at determining the prevalence and the blood pressure (BP) profile of isolated ambulatory hypertension, defined as an elevated ambulatory BP with normal office blood pressure, in a series of 1488 consecutive outpatients referred for routine clinical evaluation of suspected or established arterial hypertension. All patients underwent both office BP (OBP) measurement by a physician and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Using OBP values (cutoff for diagnosis of hypertension >/=140/90 mmHg) and daytime ABPM (cutoff for diagnosis of hypertension >/=135/85 mmHg), patients were classified into eight subgroups. In the whole series we found that, independent of treatment status, the prevalence of isolated ambulatory hypertension exceeded 10%. More importantly, 45.3% of individuals who presented with normal OBP values, showed elevated BP at ABPM. Night-time BP, 24-h pulse pressure, and BP variability were significantly higher in isolated ambulatory hypertensives than in normotensive or in white-coat hypertensive individuals. Therefore, isolated ambulatory hypertension is characterized by a blood pressure profile that is similar to that observed in sustained hypertension. These findings suggest that isolated ambulatory hypertension is very common and probably the indications for ABPM should be more extensive in outpatients referred to hypertensive centre.     

Target organ damage in "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension"

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigated (i) the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in patients who had never been treated earlier with antihypertensive medication, and (ii) the association of these conditions with target organ damage. METHODS: A total of 1,535 consecutive patients underwent office blood pressure (BP) measurements, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography, and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries. Subjects who showed normotension or hypertension on the basis of both office and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurement were characterized as having confirmed normotension or confirmed hypertension, respectively. WCH was defined as office hypertension with ambulatory normotension, and MH as office normotension with ambulatory hypertension. RESULTS: WCH was found in 17.9% and MH in 14.5% of the subjects. The prevalence of WCH was significantly higher in subjects with obesity, while the prevalence of MH was significantly higher in normal-weight subjects. The confirmed hypertensive subjects as well as the masked hypertensive subjects had significantly higher left ventricular mass (LVM) (corrected for body surface area) and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) than the confirmed normotensive subjects did (108.9 +/- 30.6, 107.1 +/- 29.1 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2) and 0.68 +/- 0.16, 0.68 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm, respectively, P < 0.005). White coat hypertensive subjects did not have a significantly higher LVM index than confirmed normotensive subjects (101.5 +/- 25.9 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2)); they tended to have higher cIMT than the confirmed normotensive subjects, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.67 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm). CONCLUSIONS: WCH and MH are common conditions in patients who visit hypertension outpatient clinics. Confirmed hypertension and MH are accompanied by increased LVM index and cIMT, even after adjusting for other risk factors.     

Clinical Implications of White Coat Hypertension

Objective: To determine the clinical implications of mild white coat hypertension (WCH).

Subjects and methods: We studied 102 subjects (54 men, 48 women). 51 of whom were normotensive and 51 slightly hypertensive. None had ever received antihypertensive therapy. An ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) record (Accutracker II), a 24-h electrocardiogram and an echocardiogram were obtained from each, and each was examined by funduscopy. WCH subjects were compared with sustained hypertension (SH) subjects and with normotensives.

Results: Fifty-three percent of the hypertensives qualified as WCH. The ultrasonographic characteristics and the ABP variables of the WCH group differed significantly from those of normotensives, but not from those of the SH group. The prevalence of left ventricilar hypertrophy (LVH) in the SH group (62.5%) did not differ significantly from its prevalence in the WCH group (40.7%). but the prevalence among normotensives (17.6%) was significantly lower than in either of the other two groups. The WCH and SH groups did not differ significantly as regards the prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy (33.3%) in the former, 58.3% in the latter). For no non-LVH, nonretinopathic subject, whether norniotensive or hypertensive, were more than 18% of daytime diastolic ABP measurements ≥90mmHg. Ultrasonographic findings were no better correlated with ABP than with in-clinic BP measurements. Fundus findings correlated well with in-clinic BP and with numerous ABP parameters. Retinopathy, with or without LVH, was efficiently predictable among hypertensives on the basis of body mass index and the 24-h maximum of systolic BP.

Conclusions: Myocardiac remodelling and vascular retinopathy develop early and in parallel in hypertensives, and both developments appear to involve determinants including body mass index and 24-h maximum systolic BP. WCH subjects, as defined by current ABP-based criteria, have cardiac and retinovascular Characteristics different to normotensive subjects. Stricter criteria are needed to discriminate between hypertensives with and without the systemic developments that constitute the immediate source of risk to the hypertensive individual.     

Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure in a population of elderly men

OBJECTIVES: The principal aim was to study ambulatory and office blood pressure in a population of elderly men. We also wanted to describe the prevalence of hypertension and investigate the blood pressure control in treated elderly hypertensives. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of a population of elderly men, conducted between 1991 and 1995. SUBJECTS: Seventy-year-old men (n = 1060), participants of a cohort study that began in 1970. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Office and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure. RESULTS: Average 24 h blood pressure in the population was 133 +/- 16/75 +/- 8 mmHg, and daytime blood pressure 140 +/- 16/80 +/- 9 mmHg. Corresponding values in untreated subjects (n = 685) were 131 +/- 16/74 +/- 7 and 139 +/- 16/79 +/- 8, respectively. An office recording of 140/90 mmHg corresponded to an ambulatory pressure of 130/78 (24 h) and 137/83 mmHg (daytime) in untreated subjects. In subjects identified as normotensives according to office blood pressure (n = 270), the 95th percentiles of average 24 h and daytime blood pressures were 142/80 and 153/85 mmHg, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension, defined as office blood pressure greater than or = 140/90 mmHg, was 66%. Despite treatment, treated hypertensives (n = 285) showed higher office (157/89 vs. 127/76 mmHg) and 24 h ambulatory (138/78 vs. 122/71 mmHg) pressures than normotensives (P < 0.05). Fourteen per cent of the treated hypertensives had an office blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a basis for 24 h ambulatory blood pressure reference values in elderly men. The study confirms previous findings of a high prevalence of hypertension at older age. It also indicates that blood pressure is inadequately controlled in elderly treated hypertensives.     

动态血压监测二级筛选诊断高血压的价值

选择上海人民出版社医务室管辖的７７０名职工中的１０８例高血压（确诊１０２例，临界６例）为对象，观察停服降压药２周以上后的２４ｈ动态血压（ＡＢＰ）参数。在１０１例（检测率９３．５％）受检患者中，ＡＢＰ各项参数均正常者占１９．８％，随年龄增大而减少，男性１５．２％，女性３６．４％（Ｐ＜０．０５）；各项参数均升高者占２５．７％，随年龄增大而增加，男性３０．４％，女性９．１％（Ｐ＜０．１）。高血压患病率根据随测血压的ＷＨＯ标准为１４．０％，按照ＡＢＰ参数则为１１．２％。结果提示动态血压监测可以作为高血压诊断的二级筛选手段，有助于识别＂诊所高血压＂和高危患者。     

Unmasking hypertension in children and adolescents with sickle/beta‐thalassemia

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, although blood pressure (BP) levels have been reported to be lower in SCD patients compared to general population. Aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence of BP phenotypes and levels of arterial stiffness in pediatric patients with SCD and to assess the differences with children at risk for hypertension. We included in the study 16 pediatric SCD (HbS/β‐thalassemia, S/β‐thal) patients and 16 consecutive children at risk for hypertension referred to our hypertension clinic that served as high‐risk controls. All patients underwent ambulatory BP monitoring and measurement of carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). S/β‐thal patients had lower office systolic BP than the high‐risk control group (115.43 ± 10.03 vs 123.37 ± 11.92, P = .05) but presented similar levels of day and night ambulatory BP. Office hypertension was found in 12.5% of the S/β‐thal patients and in 43.8% of the high‐risk controls (P = .06), while 18.8% of the S/β‐thal patients and 25% of the high‐risk controls presented hypertension by ambulatory BP levels (P = .21). All of the S/β‐thal patients with ambulatory hypertension had night hypertension (one combined night and day hypertension) with office normotension (masked hypertension). S/β‐thal patients and high‐risk controls presented equal prevalence of masked hypertension (18.8%). Children and adolescents with S/β‐thal present similar prevalence of BP phenotypes and levels of PWV with children at risk for hypertension. A significant number of children and adolescents with S/β‐thal may have masked nighttime hypertension despite normal office BP levels.     

Prognostic value of lipoprotein fractions in essential hypertension

Background: To evaluate distribution and prognostic value of total cholesterol and lipoprotein fractions in essential hypertension. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 2649 initially untreated subjects with essential hypertension (aged 51, 46.5% women) were investigated at entry and followed for a mean of 5.6 years (range: 1-16). Results: At entry, subjects with total cholesterol (TC) ≥240 mg/dl (≥6.22 mmol/l) or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HDL-C) 6 were 47.7%. TC, HDL-C, LDL-C and triglycerides (TG) did not show any association with office or 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP). During follow-up there were 167 first cardiac events and 122 first cerebrovascular events. TC, HDL-C, LDL-C and TC/HDL-C ratio showed an association with cardiac events, but not with cerebrovascular events. TG did not show any association with cardiac or cerebrovascular events. After adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, smoking, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and 24-h pulse pressure, the hazard ratio for cardiac events was 1.83 (95% CI 1.23-2.71) in association with a TC ≥6.22 mmol/l, 2.23 with a HDL-C 6.0 (95% CI 2.23-6.81). When forced in the same model, HDL-C and LDL-C showed an independent association with cardiac events. Conclusions: Abnormalities of TC and lipoproteins are common in essential hypertension. HDL-C and LDL-C independently predict the risk of cardiac, but not cerebrovascular, events. Their predictive value is independent of several confounding factors including LV hypertrophy and ambulatory BP.     

Impact of disease duration and cardiovascular dysautonomia on hypertension in Parkinson's disease

The authors evaluated the association of Parkinson’s disease (PD) duration with hypertension, assessed by office measurements and 24‐hour (ambulatory) monitoring, in 167 patients. Hypertension was evaluated through both office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements. Among participants (mean age 73.4±7.6 years; 35% women), the prevalence of hypertension was 60% and 69% according to office and ambulatory BP measurements, respectively (Cohen's k=0.61; P<.001). PD duration was inversely associated with hypertension as diagnosed by office measurements (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–0.98) but not by ambulatory monitoring (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81–1.01). Ambulatory BP patterns showed higher nocturnal BP among patients with long‐lasting disease. In conclusion, ambulatory BP monitoring improves the detection of hypertension by 15% in PD, compared with office evaluation. The likelihood of having hypertension does not decrease during the PD course; rather, BP pattern shifts towards nocturnal hypertension.     

24-h Ambulatory blood pressure in patients with ECG-determined left ventricular hypertrophy: left ventricular geometry and urinary albumin excretion-a LIFE substudy

This study was undertaken to evaluate the relationships among left ventricular (LV) geometric patterns and urinary albumin excretion in patients with hypertension and electrocardiographic (ECG) LV hypertrophy. In 143 patients with stage II-III hypertension, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, single urine albumin determination, and echocardiography were performed after 14 days of placebo treatment. Mean age was 68+/-7 years, 35% were women, body mass index was 28+/-5 kg/m(2), LV mass index (LVMI) was 125+/-26 g/m(2), and 24% had microalbuminuria. The mean office BP was 176+/-15/99+/-8 mmHg and the mean daytime ambulatory BP was 161+/-18/92+/-12 mmHg. Ambulatory BP, but not office BP, was higher among albuminuric compared to normoalbuminuric patients. In patients with established hypertension, daytime pulse pressure and office BP were different in the four patterns of LV geometry, with the highest pressure in those with abnormal geometry. Furthermore, microalbuminuria was more frequent in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy than in those with either normal geometry or concentric remodelling. White coat hypertensives (10%) showed lower LVMI and no microalbuminuria compared to patients with established hypertension. There were no differences in the prevalence of nondippers (26%) among the four LV geometric patterns or in microalbuminuria. In conclusion, increased daytime pulse pressure and office BP were associated with increased prevalence of abnormal LV geometry. Microalbuminuria was more frequent in groups with concentric and eccentric LV hypertrophy. Ambulatory BP, but not office BP, was higher in albuminuric than normoalbuminuric patients. With regard to the relationship among BP, LV geometric patterns, and urine albumin excretion in this population, 24-h ambulatory BP did not provide additional information beyond the office BP.     

Office blood pressure underestimates ambulatory blood pressure in peripheral arterial disease in comparison to healthy controls

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) constitute a subgroup of high-risk hypertensives, but controlled studies on 24-h blood pressure (BP) and diurnal variation of BP are lacking. This study was performed in order to test the hypothesis that office BP (OBP) may underestimate 24-h BP in PAD patients in comparison to a matched control group. In all, 98 male patients (mean age 68 years) with a history of intermittent claudication and an ankle/brachial index less than 0.9, and 94 controls matched for age but without PAD or ischaemic heart disease performed 24-h recordings of ambulatory BP. A total of 59 patients had a history of hypertension and 69 were on treatment with BP-lowering drugs as compared to 17 and 23 of the control subjects, respectively. Office as well as 24-h systolic BP (SBP) were higher in patients as compared to controls (151 +/- 22 vs 140 +/- 20 mmHg, P < 0.001 and 142 +/- 14 vs 133 +/- 15 mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively), but did not differ with regard to diastolic BP. In an analysis of covariance with the continuous factors age, office SBP and the categorical factor antihypertensive treatment, 24-h SBP was higher in PAD patients compared to controls (P < 0.05). The difference between office and night SBP was lower in PAD patients with antihypertensive treatment compared to controls (P = 0.01). In conclusion, Male patients with PAD had higher systolic but not diastolic BP than age-matched control subjects. In PAD patients, 24-h SBP was higher than expected from OBP compared to controls. Night SBP was higher only in patients with antihypertensive treatment. In PAD patients, especially when on antihypertensive treatment, the severity of hypertension may be underestimated when based on OBP only.     

Birth weight, hypertension and "white coat" hypertension: size at birth in relation to office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure

We investigated the association of size at birth with hypertensive status defined by office blood pressure (BP) and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring in a historical cohort study of 736 men born 1920-1924 and examined at age 70 years. Office BP was measured after 10-min supine rest with a sphygmomanometer, ambulatory BP was recorded with Accutracker 2, and anthropometric and other measurements were taken at a clinic. Birth weight and gestational age were abstracted from the men's birth records. A total of 24% of the men were treated for hypertension at the time of the study. Among not treated subjects, there was a weak positive association of birth weight with daytime and 24-h diastolic ambulatory BP. In subjects treated for hypertension, both office and ambulatory BP were inversely related to birth weight, although these associations were not statistically significant. Birth weight did not show significant association with sustained hypertension (elevated office and daytime ambulatory BPs) but showed a strong and statistically significant inverse association with "white coat" hypertension (elevated office BP and normal daytime ambulatory BP) when adjusted for concurrent body mass index (odds ratios 1.91, 1.59, 1 and 1.21 from lowest to highest quartile of birth weight, P-value for trend 0.035). We conclude that BP measured by 24-h-ambulatory monitoring is not related to birth weight in a pattern previously reported for office BP and that factors related to growth in utero are particularly related to higher risk of "white coat" hypertension.     

Masked Hypertension in Elderly Managerial Employees and Retirees

Masked hypertension is reported to have the same level of hazard risk of cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity as sustained hypertension. The number of managerial employees suffering from cardiovascular disease and stroke is known to be greater than other employee. The aim of this study was to compare the 24-h blood pressure (BP) recordings between elderly male managerial employees and retirees and to propose a strategy for identifying masked hypertension. A total of 38 males (16 managerial employees aged 50–69 years and 22 retirees aged 60–65 years) who were not taking any antihypertensive medications participated in this study. Their 24-h BP was measured by an ambulatory BP monitoring device. Daytime (9:00–17:00 h) BPs of the employees (mean, 139/92 mm Hg) were significantly higher than in the retirees (mean 124/80 mm Hg), while there was no difference in BP before and during sleep. In all, 5 of 16 employees (31%) who were diagnosed as normotensive (<140/90 mm Hg) at a periodic health check had hypertension (>135/85 mm Hg) in the morning measured by ambulatory BP monitoring, while 6 (38%) had a similar level of hypertension during the daytime (9:00–17:00h). These individuals were diagnosed as having masked hypertension. Multiple regression analyses showed that the job was the only factor that contributed to the difference in BP in the subjects during the daytime. This finding suggested that job stress seemed to be one of the main causes of masked hypertension. We argue that more frequent measurements of BP at the work place are necessary to identify subjects with masked hypertension.     

Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure for the management of antihypertensive treatment: a randomized controlled trial

The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of 24-h blood pressure (BP) measurement in the management of antihypertensive therapy improves BP in patients with sustained hypertension. Patients with sustained hypertension (office BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, and 24-h systolic BP > or =130/80 mm Hg) were randomly assigned to a strategy using 24-h BP to manage antihypertensive treatment (target <130/80 mm Hg) or to a standard strategy using office BP (target <140/90 mm Hg). The primary end point was change in 24-h systolic BP at 1 year of follow-up. We included 136 patients in the primary analysis. After 1 year of follow-up, the change in 24-h systolic BP was significantly greater in the ambulatory BP group compared with the office BP group (mean difference (95% confidence interval) -3.6 (-7.0, -0.3), P=0.03). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed essentially unchanged results. The mean number of antihypertensive drugs per participant at 1 year of follow-up was 1.76+/-1.1 and 1.95+/-0.9 in the ambulatory and office BP group, respectively (P=0.049). The benefit of ambulatory BP monitoring was mainly seen in patients with previously known hypertension (mean difference -7.2 (-11.6, -2.8), P=0.002), but not in those with newly detected hypertension (mean difference 0.2 (-4.9, 5.4), P=0.93). In conclusion, using 24-h BP for the management of antihypertensive therapy in patients with sustained hypertension leads to a greater BP reduction compared with a standard treatment strategy using office BP, although fewer antihypertensive drugs were used in the ambulatory BP group.     

White coat hypertension in centenarians

BACKGROUND: To study white coat (WC) hypertension in centenarians, a cross-sectional surveillance was carried out on Uygurs, a long-lived population in China. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) was performed in 33 centenarians (age range, 100 to 113 years) and compared with 100 elderly subjects (age range, 65 to 70 years). All subjects were clinically healthy and capable of self-care. Subjects had no history, signs, or symptoms of cardiovascular disease and were receiving no medical treatments. Office BP, 24-h mean, daytime and night-time BP, pulse pressure, heart rate, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) of the same variables were extracted from ABPM. The WC effect was defined as the difference between mean office and daytime BP. RESULTS: Centenarians demonstrated higher prevalence of WC hypertension, compared to elderly group (15% vs. 5%). The WC effect was also greater in centenarians than in elderly subjects, and was more marked for systolic BP than for diastolic BP and heart rate. The WC effect for systolic BP was positively correlated with both SD (r = 0.45, P < .01) and CV (r = 0.55, P < .01) for 24-h systolic BP in centenarians, but not in elderly subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of WC hypertension was greater in centenarians than in elderly subjects. The WC effect and BP variation may be increased in centenarians. Previously observed higher BPs seen in very elderly individuals might be explained by the greater impact of WC hypertension.     

Gender difference in the relation blood pressure-left ventricular mass and geometry in newly diagnosed arterial hypertension

Much evidence suggests sexual dimorphism in the relationship linking blood pressure (BP) to both left ventricular mass (LVM) and geometry in hypertension. To better evaluate gender-associated characteristics in the relation BP-LVM among newly diagnosed hypertension (24-h average ambulatory BP monitoring, ABPM, >?125/80 mmHg), we measured indexed LVM and relative wall thickness (RWT) by standardized echographic methods in 209 Caucasian drug-na?ve subjects, of whom 162 (100M/62F) were recognized to be hypertensive. Mean office systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP), 24-h average and night-time BP values were similar between sexes and significantly related to indexed LVM in both genders. Daytime SBP was significantly related to indexed LVM only in females (r =0.41; p =0.0008 in women; r =0.11; p = NS in males), while LVM was more sensitive to day-to-night SBP change in females. RWT was, on the contrary, significantly related to ABPM values only in males. All these findings were confirmed after adjusting for possible confounders. Percentage of LVM variance explained by 24-h average, daytime or night-time SBP values were higher in females than in males (17% vs 3%; 11% vs 1%; and 17% vs 8%). In conclusion, in early hypertension, LVM was significantly associated with daytime BP and more sensitive to reduced percentage of night BP fall in females. LVM variance explained by ABPM SBP was much higher in females than in males. RWT, expressing concentric LVM remodelling was, conversely, more related to BP increase in males.     

Prevalence and clinical significance of a greater ambulatory versus office blood pressure ('reversed white coat' condition) in a general population

BACKGROUND: Attention has recently been directed to a condition termed 'reversed white coat' because of an average 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) uncharacteristically greater than office BP. No data are available, however, on the prevalence of this condition in the general population, as well as on its relationship to BP, age, gender, antihypertensive treatment and cardiac organ damage. METHODS: In 3200 individuals (participation rate 64%), randomly selected to be representative of the residents of Monza (Milan, Italy) for sex and decades of age (25 to 74 years), we measured office BP (average of three measurements, sphygmomanometry), ambulatory BP (automatic readings every 20 min, Spacelabs 90207) and left ventricular mass (echocardiography). RESULTS: A 'reversed white coat' condition (identified when 24-h average ambulatory systolic, diastolic or mean were higher than the corresponding office values) was seen in 15% (diastolic) to 26% (systolic) of the population as a whole. Prevalence was greater (34-40%) when the difference between office and daytime BP was considered but in both instances it remained less than the prevalence of the white-coat phenomenon. A reversed white-coat condition was similarly frequent in males and females and showed a steep reduction with age and increasing office BP values. Prevalence was greater in hypertensive subjects in whom treatment achieved BP control than in untreated or unsatisfactorily treated individuals. Within each quartile of 24-h or office BP, left ventricular mass index adjusted for demographic and biochemical values was similar in reversed white coat versus the remaining subjects. The absence of any association with left ventricular hypertrophy scores against the clinical significance of this phenomenon.     

The relationship between casual and ambulatory blood pressure in essential hypertension: the influence of work, duration of hypertension and antihypertensive treatment

Casual blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP (mean 24-h BP) were determined in 23 untreated patients with essential hypertension and in 11 normotensive healthy control subjects. Mean 24-h BP was significantly lower than casual BP in patients with essential hypertension, but not in control subjects. This was demonstrated in the patients who did not work during the ambulatory BP monitoring and in the patients with newly recognized hypertension, whereas no differences were revealed either in the patients who went to work or had a known duration of hypertension longer than 6 months. The size of the difference between casual BP and mean 24-h BP was unaffected by antihypertensive therapy with metoprolol and also individually reproducible. An accordance between casual and ambulatory BP measurements in evaluation of the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment was found in 75% of the patients. Casual BP and mean 24-h BP were weakly correlated both before and during antihypertensive treatment. It is concluded that the higher casual BP than ambulatory BP in essential hypertension may be a specific characteristic of the disease. Both work and known duration of hypertension longer than 6 months eliminate the difference between casual ambulatory BP in essential hypertension. Ambulatory BP monitoring seems to be superior to casual BP measurements in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment.