A phase I trial of docetaxel and 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the recommended doses for further trials of docetaxel in combination with a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients who had been treated previously with at least one chemotherapeutic regimen, patients were treated with docetaxel as a 1-h infusion on day 1 followed by 5-FU as a continuous infusion on days 1 through 5 every 3-4 weeks. Three or six patients were assessed at the following escalating dose levels of docetaxel/5-FU per day: 40/150, 40/300, 50/300, 50/500 and 60/500 mg m(-2). Nineteen patients entered this trial, of whom 18 could be assessed for adverse event and therapeutic efficacy. The DLTs were neutropenia and diarrhoea. The MTDs were 60 mg m(-2) of docetaxel on day 1 and 500 mg m(-2) per day of 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU. One of 18 patients achieved a complete response and eight achieved partial response (over all response rate: 50%). The recommended doses of docetaxel and 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU for a phase II trial are 50 mg m(-2) and 500 mg m(-2) per day every 3 or 4 weeks.     

Dermatological Toxicity from Chemotherapy Containing 5-Fluorouracil

Summary

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an antimetabolite frequently used in the treatment of cancer. The most common adverse reactions are acute gastrointestinal effects and bone marrow suppression while neurological, ocular and dermatological toxicities are unusual. Several cutaneous manifestations can be found. They are hyperpigmentation, maculo-papuhtr eruption and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPES) promptly reversed with discontinuation of 5-FU. The etiopathogenesis of such manifestations is still unknown particularly as regards PPES, but it has been postulated that the local drug accumulation secondary to different scheduling (continuous infusion instead of bolus infusion), the total amount of drug, alcoholism, local trauma, increased blood flow could be responsible for them. In this study we have reported 10 cases of dermatological toxicity (1 of these had PPES) observed from January ’91 to December ’93 in 81 patients treated with bolus injection of 5-FU containing combination chemotherapy.     

A case report--a patient with gingiva carcinoma showing complete remission after combination chemotherapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil

We report a patient showing a complete remission after combination chemotherapy with nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). A 63-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for advanced carcinoma of gingiva. 5-FU was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/body (700 mg/m2) by continuous infusion for 120 hours on days 1 to 5. Nedaplatin was administered at a dose of 140 mg/body (90 mg/m2) by drip infusion for 120 minutes on day 5. This combination chemotherapy resulted in a complete remission of the tumor after 2 weeks. There has been no sign of recurrence for 6 months after the chemotherapy.     

Evaluation of high-dose cisplatin and 5-FU infusion as initial therapy in advanced head and neck cancer

The combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in head and neck cancer patients produces an overall response rate of 90% for advanced disease and 70% for recurrent disease. Whether or not escalating the platinum dose in combination with other agents, as has been done with refractory ovarian and testicular patients, would improve the response rates in patients with advanced head and neck cancer has not been evaluated. We undertook a study to determine the most efficacious dose of cisplatin that could be administered with 5-FU infusion in head and neck cancer patients. Eleven patients entered the study. Initial dose of cisplatin was 40 mg/m2 (in hypertonic saline) on days 1-5 plus 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1-5 as a continuous infusion. Subsequent cisplatin doses were adjusted for the main toxicity, which was myelosuppression. The safest tolerable dose was 30 mg/m2 for 5 days. Overall response was 90% [45% complete response (CR) (5/11) plus 45% (5/11) partial response (PR)] which is comparable to that seen with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and 5-FU in a 120-h infusion. Although patient numbers are small, there was no appreciable difference in response rate with higher dose cisplatin and there was a significant increase in serious toxicity.     

Sequence-dependence of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and effectiveness of different sequences of treatment with cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with unresectable advanced and post-operative recurrent gastric cancer. Patients with unresectable advanced or post-operative recurrent gastric cancer were randomly assigned by a registration center to group A or B. Group A received CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1 and 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 2-5. Group B was given 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4, followed by CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 5. Each course of chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days. A total of 74 patients were enrolled. One patient died accidentally, and 5 could not be evaluated. Response was assessable in 68 patients. The response rate was 31.3% (10/32) in group A as compared with 13.9% (5/36) in group B. Although the response rate was higher in Group A, the difference was not significant (p=0.085). The response rate in patients with diffuse type tumors was significantly lower in group B. There was no difference between the groups in response among patients with intestinal type tumors. The median overall survival was 239 and 174 days and time to progression was 175 and 140 days in group A and group B, respectively. Although there were trends toward longer survival and time to progression in group A, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. There was also no difference in the type or incidence of adverse reactions. The results of this controlled study indicate that the overall response rate was slightly but not significantly higher in patients who received CDDP before 5-FU. Among patients with diffuse type tumors, the response rate was significantly lower when 5-FU was administered before CDDP. Our results suggest that CDDP should be given before 5-FU in patients with gastric cancer when treated with a combination of CDDP and 5-FU.     

Hemodynamics at hepatoarterial infusion of 5-FU in a chronic renal failure patient maintained by hemodialysis

The authors studied the hemodynamics of 5-FU hepatoarterial infusion in a colorectal cancer patient with multiple liver metastases, who had chronic renal failure maintained by hemodialysis. Under weekly high dose 5-FU hepatoarterial infusion (1,000 mg/m2, 5 hours), on a non-dialysis day, serum 5-FU concentration was 1,090 ng/ml just after the 5 h infusion, 391 ng/ml at 15 min, 217 ng/ml at 30 min, 47 ng/ml at 60 min, and < 4 ng/ml at 120 min after infusion. On a dialysis day it was 1,500 ng/ml just after infusion, 41 ng/ml at 15 min, 5 ng/ml at 30 min, and < 4 ng/ml at 60 and 120 min after infusion. A control group (n = 4), who had liver metastases from colorectal cancers and normal renal functions, showed 5-FU serum concentration of 987 +/- 384 ng/ml just after infusion, 226 +/- 117 ng/ml at 15 min, 18.5 +/- 5.8 ng/ml at 30 min, < 4 ng/ml at 60 and 120 min after infusion. The serum 5-FU concentration of the patient was maintained higher on non-dialysis days, while it decreased more rapidly on dialysis days than that of the control group. There were no clinical complications due to the weekly high dose 5-FU hepatoarterial infusion. Under the treatment of continuous 5-FU hepatoarterial infusion (500 mg/day), the serum 5-FU concentration of this patient was kept under 115 ng/ml. After hemodialysis, the concentration decreased. The serum 5-FU concentration of the control group (n = 4) was under 66 ng/ml. There were no side effects under the protocol of continuous 5-FU hepatoarterial infusion. 5-FU hepatoarterial infusion for liver metastasis was a safe treatment for a renal failure patient with hemodialysis.     

A phase-I clinical-trial of a protracted continuous-infusion of 5-Fluorouracil with oral folinic Acid in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum

Studies of the mechanism of action of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) suggest that maximal inhibition of the target enzyme thymidylate synthase can be achieved with a protracted infusion of 5-FU and oral leucovorin. We report the results of a phase I study in which seven patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with a 30-day continuous infusion of 5-FU and a fixed 50 mg dose of oral folinic acid every 6 hours. The 5-FU dose started at 100 mg/m(2)/day with planned escalations of 50 mg/m(2)/day. The qualitative toxic effects observed included diarrhea, mucositis, and hand/foot syndrome. These toxic effects were manageable at 100 mg/m(2)/day, but became dose-limiting at 150 mg/m(2)/day with two of four patients unable to complete the planned 30-day infusion. No objective responses were observed, but minor activity was documented in two patients. We recommend a starting dose of 125 mg/m(2)/day for subsequent phase II trials of this regimen in patients with colorectal cancer.     

Whole-body hyperthermia (41.8 degrees C) combined with bimonthly oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Second- and third-line treatments remain a challenge in advanced colorectal cancer. Studies of bimonthly regimens of high-dose leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous infusion combined with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) have shown encouraging response rates in patients not responding to a bimonthly LV/5-FU regimen. Hyperthermic enhancement of L-OHP efficiency by increased DNA adduct formation has been demonstrated in vitro. This study was designed to address feasibility, toxicity and efficacy issues of whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) as an adjunct to L-OHP/LV/5-FU in pretreated patients after progression to first- and second-line treatments with LV/5-FU by continuous infusion and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with advanced colorectal cancer, who had progressed during or within 3 months after completion of chemotherapy with LV/5-FU 24-h infusion (LV/5-FU(24h)) (eight patients) or irinotecan combined with or after LV/5-FU(24h )(36 patients), were treated with L-OHP 85 mg/m(2), 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed by LV 200 mg/m(2), 1-h i.v. infusion, and 5-FU 3 g/m(2), 48-h continuous infusion. Every second cycle of the biweekly regimen was combined with WBH, thus allowing a comparison of toxicity with and without WBH in the same patient. Whole-body hyperthermia was administered by a humidified radiant heat device. The target temperature of 41.8 degrees C was maintained for 60 min. L-OHP (2-h infusion) was started at a core body temperature of 39 degrees C. RESULTS: All patients could be evaluated for toxicity, and 41 patients were evaluable for response. A total of 273 L-OHP-containing regimens were administered, 130 with and 143 without WBH. Hyperthermic treatment combined with L-OHP/LV/5-FU showed no unexpected toxicities. WHO grade 3 toxicities were rare and evenly balanced between cycles given with or without WBH. One early death occurred due to sepsis and tumor lysis. The overall response rate was 20%, with two complete and six partial responses. Twenty-three patients (56%) had stable disease and nine patients (22%) progressive disease. With a median observation time of 70 weeks, the median time to progression was 21 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-25 weeks] and the median survival was 50 weeks (95% CI 39-61 weeks) from the start of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests some advantage of combining L-OHP/LV/5-FU with WBH. Results compare favorably with the activity of similar regimens without WBH in less extensively pretreated patients. These data support further evaluation and warrant phase III studies.     

Combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil bolus and infusion, and cisplatin (LV5FU2-P regimen) in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy with continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in a monthly regimen is one of the standard treatments for advanced gastric carcinoma. This study evaluated the new LV5FU2-P regimen, designed to improve efficacy and tolerance of the 5-FU plus cisplatin combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinoma were prospectively included in the study. They were treated every 14 days with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2 plus folinic acid 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 2, plus bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 and 2, plus continuous 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day as a 22-h i.v. infusion on days 1 and 2. Ten patients received a simplified regimen (folinic acid 40 mg/m(2) day 1 + bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) day 1 + continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2). RESULTS: All the patients were assessable for response and 42 for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and 15 a partial response, for an overall response rate of 37.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1% to 52.3%]. The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.4-10.9) and the overall survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 10.1-16.4). There were no treatment-related deaths. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common severe toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: LV5FU2-P is an active and well tolerated regimen in the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinomas. It warrants evaluation comparatively with other active regimens.     

A weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+leucovorin and bi-weekly cisplatin (CDDP) was active and well tolerated in patients with non-colon digestive carcinomas

In patients with non-colon digestive carcinomas, various schedules and doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combined with cisplatin (CDDP) have been used extensively. The present study explored the toxicity and activity of a weekly 24-h infusion of high dose 5-FU modulated by high dose leucovorin with bi-weekly CDDP. 59 patients with measurable disease were treated with a weekly infusion of high dose 5-FU (2 or 2.6 g/m2)+leucovorin 500 mg/m2 for 6 weeks and a bi-weekly dose of CDDP (50 mg/m2). All patients had metastatic or locoregionally advanced disease and had a performance status < or =3. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 58 for response. Toxicity was different according to the schedule of 5-FU. Serious adverse events occurred most frequently when 5-FU was given at a dose of 2.6 g/m2 with a high incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (16%) and febrile neutropenia (13%), and led to dose reductions in both CDDP and 5-FU in 13 patients (34%). For patients who started 5-FU at a dose of 2 g/m2, no reduction in 5-FU was required, and only 4 patients required a dose reduction of CDDP (19%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 10% of patients of this group and only 1 patient required hospitalisation for febrile neutropenia. Other grade 3/4 toxicities were rare in both groups. Renal toxicity was infrequent and mild and did not require dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 33%; 19 patients achieved a partial responses (PR). No patient had a complete response (CR). The median duration of response was 5.7 months (range 2-24 months) and the median survival was 7.9 months ( range: 1-30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7-9). The combination of weekly 24-h infusion of high dose 5-FU with leucovorin and bi-weekly cisplatin seems a well-tolerated and active treatment in non-colon digestive carcinomas. A dose of 2 g/m2 of 5-FU seems to be recommended.     

A dose-intensive regimen of 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) was delivered in a dose-intensive schedule to 23 patients with metastatic or unresectable colorectal carcinoma. The schedule consisted of bolus single-dose 5-FU therapy 400 to 500 mg followed by 4-day infusion of 5-FU, 600 to 800 mg/m2/day, followed by a 17-day to 24-day infusion of 200 to 250 mg/m2/day. Partial remissions were seen in 22% of all eligible patients. Significant toxicity, including mucositis, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome, necessitated dose reductions in most patients. The authors conclude that 5-FU given in this moderately intensive schedule is associated with a moderate level of response, as easily achieved with more conventional schedules or with 5-FU-leucovorin combinations. Tumor responsiveness to dose intensive 5-FU regimens may be limited.     

Phase I study of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin by a 14-day circadian infusion in metastatic adenocarcinoma patients

Initial experimental and clinical studies have indicated that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity can be reduced by delivering 5-FU at around 4 a.m. More recent data have suggested that the toxicity might be reduced even more with delivery at around 9–10 p.m. The current study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) delivered as a continuous circadian infusion over 14 days every 28 days, with the peak of the infusion occurring at around 3–4 a.m. The peak drug delivery was shifted to 9–10 p.m. in all patients developing toxicity of grade II (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) to determine if this timing further reduced toxicity and enabled increased dose intensity. A total of 14 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma received an admixture of 5-FU and LV via a programmable portable infusion pump, with 62.5% of the 24-h dose being given over 7 h around the infusion peak. The starting dose level of 5-FU (200 mg/m² daily) and LV (5 mg/m² daily) was that established as the highest tolerable dose rate in a previously reported phase I study using a 14-day flat infusion of 5-FU and LV. The LV dose was first escalated to 20 mg/m² daily, followed by escalations of the 5-FU dose. A total of 51 courses were evaluable for toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicity was oral mucositis and hand-foot syndrome. More dose intensity could be delivered using a circadian infusion peaking at around 3–4 a.m. than was possible with a flat infusion of these drugs. Toxicity was redouced even further with peak drug delivery at around 9–10 p. m. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this schedule is 250 mg/m² 5-FU daily and 20 mg/m² LV daily with the peak of the infusion occurring at 9–10 p.m. This is a 300% and 25% higher dose for LV and 5-FU, respectively, than was found to be safe for a flat infusion.This work was supported in part by a grant from Lederle Laboratories Division, Cyanamid Canada Inc. This paper was presented in part in abstract form (abstract 528) at the 6th European Conference on Clinical Oncology and Cancer Nursing, October 27–31, 1991, Florence, Italy     

Continuous cisplatin (24-hour) and 5-fluorouracil (120-hour) infusion in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been reported to be one of the most active chemotherapeutic regimens in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, 21 patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma received a combination of cisplatin given as a 100 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 hours and 5-FU given as a 1000 mg/m2 24-hour continuous infusion for 120 hours. Toxicity was evaluated in all patients, and response and survival were evaluated 20 patients. There were two complete remissions (10%) and three partial remissions (15%) for a major response of 25%. Overall survival for the complete responders was 79+ and 61+ weeks, respectively. Median survival for all patients was 36 weeks. Toxicity consisted of moderate to severe nausea and vomiting in 14 patients (66%), mucositis in 14 patients (66%), granulocytopenia of less than 1000/microliter in 11 patients (52%), objective peripheral neuropathy in one patient (4.7%), and nephrotoxocity in one patient (4.7%). We conclude that the efficacy of 24-hour cisplatin infusion and 120-hour 5-FU infusion in the treatment of recurrent head and neck squamous carcinoma is not superior to the efficacy of single agent trials reported in the literature.     

Bioavailability and feasibility of subcutaneous 5-fluorouracil.

Continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to be superior to bolus regimens in terms of response rates and toxicity. However, a continuous infusion is more expensive and prone to complications such as thromboembolism and infections. A way to circumvent these problems would be to administer 5-FU subcutaneously (s.c.). To assess feasibility and bioavailability of s.c. 5-FU, eight patients with advanced cancer received 250 mg 5-FU as an infusion over 90 min either intravenously (i.v.) or s.c. into the abdominal wall. The mean +/- s.d. bioavailability of s.c. 5-FU was 0.89 +/- 0.23. The interpatient variability for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 48% for the s.c. and 36% for the i.v. infusion. No local side effects were observed. To test the local tolerance of a more prolonged administration three patients received 930-1,000 mg m-2 5-FU by 24-h continuous s.c. infusion. The steady-state plasma levels were comparable to i.v. infusion. One patient developed a painless skin pigmentation at the s.c. infusion site. However, the same reaction was observed at the forearm after i.v. infusion. We conclude that at the dose studied s.c. 5-FU has an almost complete bioavailability and is well tolerated. Further work will show, whether prolonged s.c. infusion can be used as a safe and economical alternative to i.v. infusion.     

CPT-11 (irinotecan) addition to bimonthly, high-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. GERCOR

CPT-11 (irinotecan) has shown activity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer resistant to leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, the simplified bimonthly LV-5-FU regimen was combined with CPT-11 (FOLFIRI) as third-line therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Continuous infusion of 5-FU was administered with disposable pumps as outpatient therapy. FOLFIRI consisted of CPT-11 180 mg/m2 as a 90-min infusion day 1; LV 400 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion during CPT-11, immediately followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 and 46-h continuous infusion of 2.4-3 g/m2 every 2 weeks. Among the 33 patients treated, 2 had partial responses for an overall response rate of 6%; 20 patients were stabilised (61%) and 11 had disease progression (33%). From the start of FOLFIRI, median progression-free survival was 18 weeks and median survival was 43 weeks. For the 242 cycles analysed, NCI-CTC toxicities grade 3-4 per patient were nausea 15%, diarrhoea 12% and neutropenia 15%. Overall, 10 patients (30%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. 7 patients (21%) had grade 2 alopecia. FOLFIRI generated activity and acceptable toxicity, in heavily pretreated patients, with limited diarrhoea, mostly asymptomatic neutropenia and manageable nausea and relatively uncommon alopecia. This regimen is suitable for studies in chemotherapy-na?ve patients.     

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in previously platinum-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin shows preclinical activity in many cancer cell lines that are resistant to cisplatin, and also has synergism with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of a combined oxaliplatin, 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) continuous infusion regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer who progressed during or after treatment with 5-FU and platinum compounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with advanced gastric cancer, whose disease progressed while receiving, or after discontinuing, chemotherapy with a 5-FU and platinum regimen, were enrolled in this study. Treatment comprised oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 1) as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2 on day 1), and 48-h infusion of 5-FU 2.4-3.0 g/m2 concurrently with LV 150 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated at 2-week intervals. RESULTS: Of the 23 evaluable patients, there were six partial responses (response rate 26%). All responding patients were among those who entered into this trial immediately after failure of previous chemotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin. The median time to progression was 4.3 months and the median overall survival was 7.3 months. The most common hematologic toxicity was grade 1-2 anemia in 39 cycles (39%). No grade 4 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia were observed. The most common non-hematologic toxicity was nausea/vomiting (33%). Peripheral neuropathy of grade 1 or 2 was noted (27%), but there was no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study of oxaliplatin, 5-FU and LV continuous infusion showed activity in previously platinum-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with acceptable toxicities.     

Docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy: a phase I, dose-finding study

This phase I study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 32 patients received docetaxel at 60, 75, 85 or 100 mg/m(2) by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed, after a 1-h interval, by 5-FU at 250, 350, 500 or 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion over 5 days every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting stomatitis defined the maximum tolerated dose at a docetaxel dose of 100 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day. None of 5 patients treated at the previous dose level (docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day) had a dose-limiting toxicity in the first cycle, and this was, therefore, considered the recommended dose. The combination was generally well tolerated. Grade 4 neutropenia was common (29 patients; 91%), but no patient experienced febrile neutropenia of duration >3 days requiring i.v. antibiotics. An objective response was achieved by 18 patients overall (56%), and in 4 out of 5 patients treated with the determined recommended dose. No pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil was apparent. The activity of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day will be explored more extensively in phase II studies of patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.     

A dose-finding study of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus a four-day continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion in advanced colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: Irinotecan (CPT-11) has shown considerable activity in colorectal cancer, and its combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) represents an attractive approach. A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of CPT-11 in combination with a continuous infusion of 5-FU for 4 days. METHODS: Forty-two patients with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer who had not received prior treatment for advanced disease were enrolled. The patients' median age was 64 years; 26 (62%) patients were men, and the performance status (WHO) was 0 in 26 (62%) patients, 1 in 15 (36%) and 2 in 1 (2%). Twenty-two (52%) patients had 2 or more metastatic sites. CPT-11 (starting dose 200 mg/m(2)) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion with increments of 50 mg/m(2) on day 4. 5-FU (starting dose 400 mg/m(2)) was administered as a 4-day continuous intravenous infusion with increments of 50 mg/m(2) on days 1-4. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The MTD of the combination was found to be 600 mg/m(2) for 5-FU and 350 mg/m(2) for CPT-11. Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and delayed diarrhea were the DLTs. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 22 (13%) out of 169 administered treatment cycles, febrile neutropenia in 7 (4%) and grade 3/4 diarrhea in 20 (12%). Other toxicities were mild. Among 36 patients evaluable for response, partial response was achieved in 8 (22%), stable disease in 12 (33%) and progressive disease in 16 (44%) patients. Responses were mostly seen at the higher dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a 4-day continuous infusion of 5-FU followed by CPT-11 represents an active and well-tolerated regimen for patients with colorectal cancer. This regimen merits further evaluation in phase II studies.     

A multicenter randomized study comparing 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion (ci) plus 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil and 5-FU ci alone in colorectal cancer

To verify the effectiveness of oral 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) in improving the surgical cure rate in advanced colorectal cancer, a multicenter randomized comparative study was conducted. A total of 429 patients who had had curative resection for stage II and III colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to a study group receiving a 14-day course of 5-FU continuous infusion (320 mg/m2/day) followed by oral HCFU for a year (300 mg/day), or to the control group receiving a 14-day course of 5-FU continuous infusion alone. In terms of background factors, no significant differences were found between the 214 patients in the study group and the 215 in the control group. Adverse reactions during the treatment were more frequently seen in the study group. But with few exceptions, the toxicities were mild and the compliance was acceptable. The 5-year overall survival rate of the study group was similar to that of the control group. The 5-year disease-free survival rate of the study group was better than that of the control group in the patients with colon cancer (hazard ratio=1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.38; p=0.037). However, this benefit was not seen in the patients with rectal cancer. A significant improvement in the disease-free survival rate was demonstrated through the addition of HCFU to 5-FU continuous infusion for the patients with colon cancer. The usefulness of oral fluoropyrimidine as an adjuvant for curative surgery for colon cancer was further warranted.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 24-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with organ dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction are often treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), but there are few data to confirm the safety of this practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors were eligible if they were able to fit into one of three organ dysfunction cohorts: I, creatinine >1.5 but < or =3.0 mg/dl and normal bilirubin; II, bilirubin >1.5 but <5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine; or III, bilirubin > or =5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine. 5-FU doses were escalated separately within each of the three cohorts. Leucovorin (LV) dosage was fixed at 500 mg/m(2). 5-FU was given as a 24-h infusion at 1000, 1800 or 2600 mg/m(2), and plasma concentrations were measured every 3 h during the first two infusions for each patient. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were treated. Toxicities did not appear to be related to organ dysfunction cohort. A weekly dose of of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) produced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in six of 20 evaluable patients.These DLTs included grade 3 fatigue (n = 3), grade 2 neutropenia precluding weekly dosing (n = 1), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and grade 3 mental status changes (n = 1). There was no relationship between serum bilirubin or serum creatinine and 5-FU clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with elevated bilirubin may be safely started on a weekly regimen of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) with leucovorin 500 mg/m(2) as a 24-h continuous infusion.