颗粒打压植骨结合骨水泥型髋臼杯在髋关节发育不良髋臼重建中的应用

目的探讨颗粒打压植骨结合骨水泥型髋臼杯在CroweⅡ、Ⅲ型髋关节发育不良（DDH）中应用的早期疗效。方法2005年3月至2008年3月,采用颗粒打压植骨重建髋臼结合骨水泥型髋臼杯治疗11例DDH继发骨性关节炎的患者。女10例,男1例,年龄43～58岁,平均49．4岁;CroweⅡ型9例,Crowem型2例,疼痛病史5～30年,术前Harris评分28～55分,平均45．3分。术后定期随访进行影像学评价和Harris评分。结果本组患者临床随访4～36个月,平均18个月,全部患者髋关节功能恢复良好,无感染、神经损伤、脱位等并发症。术后Harris评分90～98分,平均94．1分,术后随访影像学上显示植骨均与宿主骨愈合,最后一次随访无植骨吸收髋臼假体松动、移位。结论颗粒打压植骨结合骨水泥型髋臼杯治疗CroweⅡ、Ⅲ型DDH患者早期效果可靠。     

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old

BACKGROUND: Acetabular bone deficiency can present a challenge during total hip arthroplasty, especially in young patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary and revision acetabular reconstruction with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup in young patients who had preexisting acetabular bone deficiency. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive acetabular reconstructions were performed in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years old (average, 37.2 years old). The impaction bone-grafting technique was used for twenty-three primary and nineteen revision acetabular reconstructions. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-one hips) were available for review after a minimum duration of follow-up of fifteen years. Clinical and radiographic results were assessed, and survivorship analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Eight hips were revised at a mean of twelve years (range, three to twenty-one years) after a primary reconstruction (four hips) or revision reconstruction (four hips). The revision was performed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in four hips and because of culture-proven septic loosening in two. Two additional cups (both in hips that had had a revision reconstruction) were revised, during revision of the femoral stem, because of wear (one hip) or because of persistent intraoperative instability (one hip). Twenty-eight hips (in twenty-five patients) had retention of the acetabular component for a minimum of fifteen years. The mean Harris hip score for that group was 89 points. Twenty-six of these twenty-eight hips had no or slight pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a twenty-year survival rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 67% to 94%) with acetabular revision for any reason as the end point and of 91% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 100%) with acetabular revision because of aseptic loosening as the end point. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique that is associated with good long-term results in young patients with acetabular bone-stock defects.     

Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15- to 20-year follow-up

This study presents the clinical and radiological results of 62 consecutive acetabular revisions in 58 patients, at a mean of 16.5 years follow-up (15 to 20). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship for the cup with end-point revisions for any reason, was 79% at 15 years (95% confidence interval (CI); 67 to 91). Excluding two revisions for septic loosening at three and six years, and one revision of a well-fixed cup after 12 years in the course of a femoral revision, the survivorship was 84% at 15 years (95% CI; 73 to 95). At review there were no additional cases of loosening, although seven acetabular reconstructions showed radiolucent lines in one or two zones. Acetabular revision using impacted large morsellised bone chips (0.7 cm to 1.0 cm) and a cemented cup, is a reliable technique of reconstruction, when assessed at more than 15 years.     

Decreased migration with locally administered bisphosphonate in cemented cup revisions using impaction bone grafting technique

Background and purpose — Impaction bone grafting (IBG) in revision hip surgery is an established method in restoring bone stock deficiencies. We hypothesized that local treatment of the morsellized allograft with a bisphosphonate in cemented revision would, in addition to increased bone density, also reduce the early migration of the cup as measured by radiostereometry (RSA).

Patients and methods — 20 patients with aseptic cup loosening underwent revision using the IBG technique. The patients were randomized to either clodronate (10 patients) or saline (10 patients, control group) as local adjunct to the morsellized bone. The outcome was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during the first year regarding periacetabular bone density and with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for the first 2 years regarding cup migration.

Results — 2 patients were lost to follow-up: 9 patients remained in the clodronate and 9 in the control group. Less proximal migration was found in the clodronate group compared with the controls, measured both over time (mixed-models analysis, p = 0.02) as well as at the specified time points up to 2 years (0.22?mm and 0.59?mm respectively, p = 0.02). Both groups seemed to have stabilized at 1 year. We found similar bone mineral density measured by DXA, and similar RSA migration in the other directions. No cups were re-revised.

Interpretation — Local treatment of the allograft bone with clodronate reduced early proximal migration of the revised cup but without any measurable difference in periacetabular bone density.     

Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem

Objective

Biological repair of femoral bone loss using bone impaction grafting. Reconstruction of the centre of rotation of the hip using a cemented stem, the size and offset of which are at the discretion of the surgeon.

Indications

Femoral implant loosening with bone loss.

Contraindications

Infection, neurological disorders, noncompliant patient.

Surgical technique

Extraction of the loose femoral implant, cortical reconstruction using meshes if required, impaction bone grafting with special instruments, cement fixation of a polished tapered stem.

Postoperative management

Individualized period of bed rest and limited weight bearing.

Results

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished stem were used to perform 33 femoral reconstructions. After a mean follow-up of 15 years, no femoral reconstruction had to be revised. One unrecognized intraoperative fracture healed after nonsurgical treatment, three postoperative femoral fractures healed after plate fixation with the stem left in situ. The average Harris Hip Score improved from 49 prior to surgery to 85 points thereafter. Kaplan–Meier analysis with femoral revision for any reason as the end point showed a survival rate of 100?%.     

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture

Purpose

Patients suffering from post traumatic osteoarthritis of the acetabulum often require a total hip arthroplasty at a relatively young age. Long-term data outcome studies for this population are lacking. We report on the long-term outcome of 20 acetabular fractures in 20 patients treated with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after a mean follow-up of 18 years (range, 12–26 years).

Methods

The group consisted of 14 males (70 %) and six females (30 %) with an average age of 53.3 years (range, 35–75 years) at time of surgery. No patients were lost to follow-up. Four patients died and three patients underwent a revision; at review 13 patients were still living with their implant in situ. Survivorship analysis was performed at 20 years follow-up for three endpoints.

Results

Survival rate with endpoint revision for any reason at 20 years postoperative was 74.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 40–91 %), 80.0 % (95 % CI, 41–95 %) for endpoint aseptic loosening, and 63.9 % (95 % CI 32–84 %) for endpoint radiographic failure. Three acetabular components were revised at 14.5, 15.3, and 16.7 years postoperative. Two cups failed for aseptic loosening and one cup failed due to septic loosening. The average postoperative Harris hip score was 82 (range, 56–100).

Conclusion

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and the use of a cemented cup after acetabular fracture is an attractive technique with acceptable long-term results and a low complication and re-operation rate.     

Acetabular revision with impacted freeze-dried cancellous bone chips and a cemented cup: a report of 7 cases at 5 to 9 years' follow-up

The long-term results of bone impaction grafting with fresh-frozen femoral head allografts and a cemented cup are favorable. Because of intermittent shortage of fresh-frozen femoral heads at our local bone bank, we used processed freeze-dried bone in 7 acetabular revisions operated between 1989 and 1994. All 7 consecutive patients were followed annually. At final review (March 2000), 1 patient had died after 8.5 years of follow-up of a cause not related to the surgery. In 1 hip, a rerevision was performed for septic loosening 5 years after the previous septic loosening. Radiographically the freeze-dried allografts seemed to incorporate in all cases but the reinfected one; progressive radiolucent lines were not seen, although 1 case had a stable line in 1 zone. The overall survival rate for the 7 acetabular reconstructions at an average follow-up of 7 years (range, 5-9 years) was 86%. At midterm follow-up, there was no aseptic loosening. In this limited case report, the results at midterm for freeze-dried allograft bone chips in acetabular reconstructions are acceptable.     

Revision arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting and Charnley-Kerboull cemented stem. Surgical technique and results

We report here the study of a personal series of 129 consecutive femoral impaction grafting during hip revision replacement performed between January 1991 and December 2005. The indication for the revision of the femoral component was aseptic loosening in 127 hips and septic loosening in two. The precise locations of the segmental defects and osteolytic areas were determined and classified, with use of the Endo-Klinik System, as follows: grade 2 in 75 hips, grade 3 in 43, and grade 4 in 11. Removal of the components, debris and cement was done with special care to achieve a complete resection of fibrous tissue in the medullary canal to ensure a direct contact between the graft and the host bone. Before impaction grafting, femoral segmental bone defects or windows were reconstructed and reinforced with strut allograft and cerclage wires. We used in all hips a special revision set of instruments specially designed for impaction grafting. All the acetabular cups were also revised. Clinical and radiologic evaluation was performed at six weeks, three months, six months and one year. Then, patients were reviewed every year for the first five postoperative years and every two years thereafter. A survivorship analysis was performed to determine the overall success of the procedure. Failure was defined as an implant that had been revised or that was radiologically loosened at the time of follow-up. The survival curve was derived from the cumulative survival rate over time, as calculated from the actuarial life table. At the last follow-up evaluation, seven patients (seven hips) had died and two (two hips) were lost to follow-up. The follow-up of these nine patients ranged from two to ten years. One hundred and twenty patients (120 hips) were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (range, two to 16 years). The average follow-up of the whole series was 8.4 years (range, two to 16 years). At the time of the final review 1 of the 129 hips had migration of the stem’s cement mantle relative to the bone (5 mm) with lucent lines at the graft-host interface in three Gruen zones. Another one had migration within the cement (8 mm) with lucent line at the distal graft-host interface and a distal fracture of the cement mantle. These two stems were considered as definitely loosed according to the criteria of Johnston et al. but none of them was revised. The remaining 127 hips showed no radiological changes at the latest examination concerning stem migration and radiolucent lines. One acetabular definite loosening occurred at ten years and was revised at 11 years postoperatively. In this respect, of the 129 hips, only one hip was revised at 11 years’ follow-up (0.7%). The survivorship analysis, with radiologic loosening as the endpoint, yielded a 98% cumulative survival rate for the femoral component and for the acetabular component, 99% at eleven years follow-up. The survival rate with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 99.4% at eleven years follow-up. The results observed in this series, regarding the need for a repeat revision for any reason, are in agreement with the excellent outcome reported by other authors using similar technique. Nevertheless two main differences must be emphasized when comparing the results of this study with the others. The first one is the low rate of subsidence and the second is the absence of postoperative femoral fracture. The quality of bone grafting and the use of a Kerboull stem, double tapered and polish, were associated with the very low rate of distal migration. The unconditional reconstruction of distal bone deficiency or weakness with bone graft strut appeared efficient to prevent the occurrence of femoral fracture, despite the unique use or standard stems.     

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: a concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report

In a previous report, we presented our results of forty-two acetabular reconstructions, performed with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup, in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years and had a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up. The present update study shows the results after twenty to twenty-eight years. Eight additional cups had to be revised--four because of aseptic loosening, three because of wear, and one during a revision of the stem. Three additional cups were considered loose on radiographs. Survivorship of the acetabular reconstructions, with an end point of revision for any reason, was 73% after twenty years and 52% after twenty-five years. With revision for aseptic loosening as the end point, survival was 85% after twenty years and 77% after twenty-five years; for signs of loosening on radiographs, survival was 71% at twenty years and 62% at twenty-five years. In conclusion, our previous results have declined but the technique of using impacted morselized bone graft and a cemented cup is useful for the purpose of restoring bone stock in young patients whose acetabular defects require primary or revision total hip arthroplasty.     

Acetabular revision with bone graft and cementless cup

Cementless acetabular components are routinely used in revision hip surgery. Nevertheless, few investigators have assessed their retention and efficacy over the long term. This occurs mainly in cases which originate from moderate to severe bone losses (cavitary and or segmental) requiring the use of morselized and or bulk bone graft. Our objective in the present study is to report the outcome of 42 patients with 43 cementless acetabular revisions with bone graft who were operated by the same surgeon. The report is based on the clinical and radiographic evaluation of the patients alive at 167 months of follow-up.     

Revision total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting with cemented nonpolished stems and Charnley cups

This article reports the results of 181 cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in which impacted morcellized allograft and cement was used for reconstitution of acetabular and femoral bone deficiencies. There were 173 acetabular and 79 femoral reconstructions. The mean follow-up was 4.0 years. The overall survival rate was 97.2%. Evidence of revascularization of the impacted allograft was shown in 29 of 30 (97%) randomly selected bone scintigraphies. Radiographic evidence of allograft incorporation was observed in 128 of 173 (74%) acetabula and 48 of 73 (61%) femora. Stem subsidence occurred in all types of femoral bone deficiencies and was not time dependent (P = .17). The acetabular components showed significant migration with increased bone deficiency (P = .0003). Impaction bone grafting has shown promising results in revision total hip arthroplasty but is not recommended in type 3 acetabular defects.     

Acetabular revision surgery with the LOR cup: three to 8 years' follow-up

A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the mid-term results of the Längsovalen Revisionspfanne oblong revision cup. From July 1995 to March 2000, 41 acetabular revision surgeries were performed for aseptic loosening of the acetabular cup. The acetabular defects were classified as type 2A to 3B, according to Paprosky's criteria. Morselized bone grafts were used in 19 cases (45.2%) to fill cavitary defects. The mean postoperative follow-up was 63.5 months (range, 40-99 months). Clinical assessment at follow-up showed a significantly improved mean Harris Hip Score from 46 points preoperatively to 82.2 points postoperatively, whereas the x-ray examination did not show any sign of loosening of the cups. Data analysis showed that significantly better results were correlated with restoring the hip rotation center and reducing leg length discrepancy.     

Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: Acetabular revision in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is often difficult because of the poor quality and quantity of the acetabular bone stock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive acetabular revisions were performed with impaction bone-grafting and use of a cemented cup in twenty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The average age at the revision was fifty-seven years. The minimum duration of follow-up of all reconstructions that were still functioning or that were followed until the time of death was three years (mean, 7.5 years; range, three to fourteen years). No patient was lost to follow-up, but five patients (six hips) died before the time of the review. The acetabular bone defects were classified as cavitary in twelve hips and as combined segmental-cavitary in twenty-three. RESULTS: The five patients (six hips) who died had been doing well at the time of their latest follow-up. Of the remaining patients, six (six hips) had a repeat revision. The average Harris hip score of the living patients with a surviving implant at the time of follow-up was 82 points, and there was no or only mild pain in twenty-one of the twenty-three hips. Radiographic analysis of all twenty-nine hips that had not been revised showed loosening in one hip and a nonprogressive radiolucent line in one zone in two others. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a prosthetic survival rate, with aseptic loosening as the end point, of 90% at eight years. CONCLUSION: Acetabular revision with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis had acceptable results at an average of 7.5 years postoperatively.     

Fence grafting for acetabular reconstruction with a cementless cup

Acetabular reconstruction is difficult after loss of bone stock and socket remodeling. Several techniques have been proposed ranging from a metal backing to allografting. We propose fence grafting. After explantation, the acetabulum is carefully cleaned of all interface tissue and precisely measured. If the vertical diameter is clearly greater than the anteroposterior diameter, a tricortical graft is harvested from the iliac crest and modeled to perfectly fit between the anterioinferior iliac spine and the residual posterior wall as well as the fundus medially. One or two oblique screws are inserted for stabilization. Any superior bone loss is filled by bone substitute (without mechanical value). The acetabulum is then reamed from the obturator foramen sparing the anterior and posterior columns. Residual bony defects are filled with cancellous bone. A hemispheric cup is then press fit and maintained with two or three screws. We performed this procedure in eight patients with SO.F.C.O.T. stage III acetabular loosening with segmentary bone loss and an oval acetabular cavity. Clinical follow-up was more than four years. The Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné score improved from 9.8 to 15.7 on average. Radiographically, there were no implant mobilization or migration and no circumferential lucent lines were observed. A nearly anatomic position was achieved in all cases except two (technical imperfection). At more than one-year follow-up, the grafts could not be distinguished from adjacent bone. For us, high-positioned or jumbo cups do not offer a satisfactory reconstruction option. There is a risk of compression with allografts from a head bank. We have not used the cemented metal-backed solution nor impacted grafts. The major drawback with fence grafting is the iliac harvesting (possible residual limping because of the extensive disinsertion of the gluteus medius. The reliable acetabular reconstruction is the major advantage. This technique is not simply an acetabular block widened laterally but it decreases the vertical dimension. This is a reliable but minute technique which allows true long-lasting reconstruction of the acetabulum.     

Acetabular revision with morsellised allogenic bone graft and a cemented metal-backed component

Failure of total hip arthroplasty with acetabular deficiency occurred in 55 patients (60 hips) and was treated with acetabular revision using morsellised allograft and a cemented metal-backed component. A total of 50 patients (55 hips) were available for clinical and radiological evaluation at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (3 to 9.5). No hip required further revision of the acetabular component because of aseptic loosening. All the hips except one had complete incorporation of the allograft demonstrated on the radiographs. A complete radiolucent line of > 1 mm was noted in two hips post-operatively. A good to excellent result occurred in 50 hips (91%). With radiological evidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component as the end-point, the survivorship at a mean of 5.8 years after surgery was 96.4%. The use of impacted allograft chips in combination with a cemented metal-backed acetabular component and screw fixation can achieve good medium-term results in patients with acetabular bone deficiency.     

Acetabular bone stock reconstruction with frozen femoral head allografts and the use of a cementless screw cup in total hip revision surgery. A 5 years' clinical, radiologic and scintigraphic follow-up

This prospective study reviews the behaviour of a cementless conical screw cup in total hip revision surgery with or without the use of bone grafts to reconstruct acetabular bone stock. Clinical and radiologic results are given. For proper radiographic interpretation a new classification system is suggested, based on histologic features, the principles of which are explained. The results of auto- or allografts for the treatment of the same pathological condition are compared. The difference between both grafts successively in bone incorporation, biochemical behaviour, morbidity and mortality rate is discussed. The difference between a cancellous and a cortical bone transplant in the mechanism of repair is discussed. This study also analyzes acetabular bone graft activity using serial technetium-99m bone scans. Some guidelines for rehabilitation programs can be deduced from these observations. Finally, a correlation between graft incorporation and the acetabular deficiency to be reconstructed can be postulated.     

Subtotal colectomy: 20 years' experience

Results of surgical treatment of 338 patients (1984-2002) with complicated cancer of the left half of the colon were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had undergone Hartman's surgery and subtotal colonectomy were comparable by age, time of hospitalization, stage of cancer and concomitant diseases. Immediate results of treatment (postoperative complications, postoperative stay, postoperative lethality) don't differ significantly. Long-term results demonstrate important difference in survival. Mean survival of patients after Hartman's surgery was 3 years 6 months, after subtotal colonectomy - 9 years 6 months. It is concluded that subtotal colonectomy is the surgery of choice in the treatment of patients with complicated cancer of colon's left half.