Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible

Background: It has been shown that peri‐implant crestal bone reactions are influenced by both a rough–smooth implant border in one‐piece, non‐submerged, as well as an interface (microgap [MG] between implant/abutment) in two‐piece butt‐joint, submerged and non‐submerged implants being placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone. According to standard surgical procedures, the rough–smooth implant border for implants with a smooth collar should be aligned with the crest of the bone exhibiting a smooth collar adjacent to peri‐implant soft tissues. No data, however, are available for implants exhibiting a sandblasted, large‐grit and acid‐etched (SLA) surface all the way to the top of a non‐submerged implant. Thus, the purpose of this study is to histometrically examine crestal bone changes around machined versus SLA‐surfaced implant collars in a side‐by‐side comparison. Methods: A total of 60 titanium implants (30 machined collars and 30 SLA collars) were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of five foxhounds forming six different subgroups (implant subgroups A to F). The implants in subgroups A to C had a machined collar (control), whereas the implants in subgroups D to F were SLA‐treated all the way to the top (MG level; test). Furthermore, the MGs of the implants were placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone: the implants in subgroups A and E were 2 mm above the crest, in subgroups C and D 1 mm above, in subgroup B 3 mm above, and in subgroup F at the bone crest level. For all implants, abutment healing screws were connected the day of surgery. These caps were loosened and immediately retightened monthly. At 6 months, animals were sacrificed and non‐decalcified histology was analyzed by evaluating peri‐implant crestal bone levels. Results: For implants in subgroup A, the estimated mean crestal bone loss (± SD) was ?0.52 ± 0.40 mm; in subgroup B, +0.16 ± 0.40 mm (bone gain); in subgroup C, ?1.28 ± 0.21 mm; in subgroup D, ?0.43 ± 0.43 mm; in subgroup E, ?0.03 ± 0.48 mm; and in subgroup F, ?1.11 ± 0.27 mm. Mean bone loss for subgroup A was significantly greater than for subgroup E (P = 0.034) and bone loss for subgroup C was significantly greater than for subgroup D (P <0.001). Conclusions: Choosing a completely SLA‐surfaced non‐submerged implant can reduce the amount of peri‐implant crestal bone loss and reduce the distance from the MG to the first bone–implant contact around unloaded implants compared to implants with a machined collar. Furthermore, a slightly exposed SLA surface during implant placement does not seem to compromise the overall hard and soft tissue integration and, in some cases, results in coronal bone formation in this canine model.     

Tissue integration of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine

Background: This study evaluates a newly developed titanium–zirconium implant (TiZr), comparing it to a commercially available pure titanium (Ti) implant subjected to the same surface treatment. Methods: In nine dogs, 12 implants (six TiZr and six Ti) were randomly placed in the mandible with the implant shoulder at the bone crest and subjected to submerged healing. Standardized radiographs were taken after implantation, and at the sacrifice of 2 weeks (three dogs), 4 weeks (three dogs), and 8 weeks (three dogs). Histologic and histomorphometric measurements were performed on non‐decalcified histologic sections. The main outcome measures included the first bone–implant contact (fBIC) and BIC over time. For statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and mixed model regressions were applied. Results: From baseline to 8 weeks, a mean bone loss of 0.09 ± 0.33 mm for TiZr and a gain of 0.02 ± 0.33 mm for Ti were calculated radiographically. The number of implants with the fBIC coronal to the reference point (implant shoulder) gradually increased over time, reaching 39% of all TiZr implants and 50% of all Ti implants at 8 weeks. The mean fBIC values for Ti and TiZr were 0.29 ± 0.42 mm and 0.26 ± 0.32 mm (2 weeks), ?0.01 ± 0.20 mm and 0.10 ± 0.28 mm (4 weeks), and ?0.06 ± 0.22 mm and 0.08 ± 0.30 mm (8 weeks), respectively. The mean BIC values peaked at 86.9% ± 6.8% (8 weeks) for TiZr and at 83.4% ± 5.9% (4 weeks) for Ti. No statistically significant differences were observed at any time point. Conclusion: TiZr and Ti bone level implants with chemically‐modified, sandblasted, and acid‐etched surfaces performed similarly in regards to osseointegration in this unloaded canine study.     

Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible

BACKGROUND: Today, implants are placed using both non-submerged and submerged approaches, and in 1- and 2-piece configurations. Previous work has demonstrated that peri-implant crestal bone reactions differ radiographically under such conditions and are dependent on a rough/smooth implant border in 1-piece implants and on the location of the interface (microgap) between the implant and abutment/restoration in 2-piece configurations. The purpose of this investigation was to examine histometrically crestal bone changes around unloaded non-submerged and submerged 1- and 2-piece titanium implants in a side-by-side comparison. METHODS: A total of 59 titanium implants were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 foxhounds, forming 6 different implant subgroups (types A-F). In general, all implants had a relatively smooth, machined coronal portion as well as a rough, sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) apical portion. Implant types A-C were placed in a non-submerged approach, while types D-F were inserted in a submerged fashion. Type A and B implants were 1-piece implants with the rough/smooth border (r/s) at the alveolar crest (type A) or 1.0 mm below (type B). Type C implants had an abutment placed at the time of surgery with the interface located at the bone crest level. In the submerged group, types D-F, the interface was located either at the bone crest level (type D), 1 mm above (type E), or 1 mm below (type F). Three months after implant placement, abutment connection was performed in the submerged implant groups. At 6 months, all animals were sacrificed. Non-decalcified histology was analyzed by evaluating peri-implant crestal bone levels. RESULTS: For types A and B, mean crestal bone levels were located adjacent (within 0.20 mm) to the rough/smooth border (r/s). For type C implants, the mean distance (+/- standard deviation) between the interface and the crestal bone level was 1.68 mm (+/- 0.19 mm) with an r/s border to first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC) of 0.39 mm (+/- 0.23 mm); for type D, 1.57 mm (+/- 0.22 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.28 mm (+/- 0.21 mm); for type E, 2.64 mm (+/- 0.24 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.06 mm (+/- 0.27 mm); and for type F, 1.25 mm (+/- 0.40 mm) with an r/s border to fBIC of 0.89 mm (+/- 0.41 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The location of a rough/smooth border on the surface of non-submerged 1-piece implants placed at the bone crest level or 1 mm below, respectively, determines the level of the fBIC. In all 2-piece implants, however, the location of the interface (microgap), when located at or below the alveolar crest, determines the amount of crestal bone resorption. If the same interface is located 1 mm coronal to the alveolar crest, the fBIC is located at the r/s border. These findings, as evaluated by non-decalcified histology under unloaded conditions, demonstrate that crestal bone changes occur during the early phase of healing after implant placement. Furthermore, these changes are dependent on the surface characteristics of the implant and the presence/absence as well as the location of an interface (microgap). Crestal bone changes were not dependent on the surgical technique (submerged or non-submerged).     

Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate crestal bone resorption and bone apposition resulting from immediate post‐extraction implants in the canine mandible, comparing a conditioned sandblasted acid‐etched implant surface with a non‐conditioned standard sandblasted implant surface. Material and methods: In this experimental study, third and fourth premolars and distal roots of first molars were extracted bilaterally from six Beagle dog mandibles. Each side of the mandible received three assigned dental implants, with the conditioned surface (CS) on the right side and the non‐conditioned surface (NCS) on the left. The dogs were sacrificed at 2 (n=2), 4 (n=2) and 12 weeks (n=2) after implant placement. Results: The microscopic healing patterns at 2, 4 and 12 weeks for both implant types (CS and NCS) yielded similar qualitative bone findings. The mean crestal bone resorption was found to be greater for all implants with NCS (2.28±1.9 mm) than CS (1.21±1.05 mm) at 12 weeks. The mean percentage of newly formed bone in contact with implants was greater in implants CS (44.67±0.19%) than with the NCS (36,6±0.11%). There was less bone resorption with the CS than the NCS. Conclusion: The data show significantly more bone apposition (8% more) and less crestal bone resorption (1.07 mm) with the CS than with the NCS after 12 weeks of healing. This CS can reduce the healing period and increase bone apposition in immediate implant placements. To cite this article:
Calvo‐Guirado JL, Ortiz‐Ruiz AJ, Negri B, López‐Marí L, Rodriguez‐Barba C, Schlottig F. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 308–315.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01841.x     

Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes that occur around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone under different restoration protocols. METHODS: Thirty-six implants were inserted in the edentulous mandible of six mongrel dogs. Each implant was assigned to an experimental group according to the distance from the top of the implant to the crestal bone: Bone Level (at crestal bone level), Minus 1 (1 mm below crestal bone), or Minus 2 (2 mm below crestal bone). Each hemimandible was submitted to a restoration protocol: conventional (prosthesis was installed 120 days after implant placement, including 30 days with healing cap) or immediate (prosthesis was installed 24 hours after implant placement). Fixed partial prostheses were installed bilaterally in the same day. After 90 days, clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: As long as the implants were inserted in more apical positions, the first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC) was positioned more apically (P <0.05). However, the apical positioning of the implants did not influence the ridge loss or the position of the soft tissue margin (PSTM) (P >0.05). In addition, in immediately restored sites, the PSTM was located significantly more coronally than that in conventionally restored sites (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the more apical positioning of the fBIC, the height of the peri-implant soft tissues and ridge was not jeopardized. Moreover, the immediate restoration protocol was beneficial to the maintenance of the PSTM. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the significance of these results in longer healing periods.     

Influence of Implant Neck Surface and Placement Depth on Crestal Bone Changes Around Platform‐Switched Implants: A Clinical and Radiographic Study in Dogs

Background: The aim of this animal study is to analyze bone remodeling around platform‐switching (PS) implants with and without a machined (MACH) collar placed at different levels in relation to the crestal bone in a canine model. Methods: All mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted in five dogs. After 6 months, grit‐blasted acid‐etched (GBAE) PS implants with and without a MACH neck were randomly inserted in each hemimandible, positioning the implant‐abutment interface in either a supracrestal (+1.5 mm), equicrestal, or subcrestal (?1.5 mm) position, and healing abutments were connected. Implant abutments were dis/reconnected at 12, 14, 16, and 18 weeks after implant placement. After 6 months of healing, animals were sacrificed. Clinical parameters and periapical radiographs were registered on the day of implant placement, at 2 months, at every abutment dis/reconnection, and at sacrifice. Crestal bone changes were calculated and defined as the primary outcome variable. Results: When crestal bone changes from implant placement to 6 months were compared between MACH and GBAE groups, no significant differences were encountered except for implants placed in an equicrestal position (P = 0.04). However, multivariable regression analysis revealed no significant differences between MACH and GBAE implants placed in a supracrestal (β = ?0.08; P = 0.45), equicrestal (β = ?0.05; P = 0.50), or subcrestal (β = ?0.13; P = 0.19) position. Conclusion: Surface treatment of the implant neck had no significant influence on crestal bone changes around PS implants with and without a MACH collar.     

Immediate loading of implants placed with the osteotome technique: one-year prospective case series

Background: There is limited information regarding marginal bone‐level changes around immediately loaded implants placed with the osteotome technique. The aim of this case series is to prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of immediately loaded implants placed with the osteotome technique over a 12‐month period. Methods: Eighteen patients in need of oral prosthetic rehabilitation that included single implant placement in positions #4 to #13 and/or #20 to #29 participated in this prospective trial. A modified implant installation procedure with an under preparation of the implant bed using the osteotome technique and immediate loading of the implant was performed. Clinical examinations were performed at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months of follow‐up. Radiographic examinations were performed at implant installation and at the 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up visits. Results: One implant failed to integrate and was removed at 3 months after implant installation. Four of 20 implants had insertion torque value >35 Ncm. The mean marginal bone loss was ‐0.09 mm at the 6‐month and ‐0.19 mm at the 12‐month follow‐up visits. Conclusion: The present case series indicates that implants placed with the osteotome technique and immediately loaded did not demonstrate a high insertion torque and exhibited minimal marginal bone loss.     

Crestal Bone Changes at Teeth and Implants in Periodontally Healthy and Periodontally Compromised Patients. A 10‐Year Comparative Case‐Series Study

Background: Limited data exist on the longitudinal crestal bone changes around teeth compared with implants in partially edentulous patients. This study sought to compare the 10‐year radiographic crestal bone changes (bone level [BL]) around teeth and implants in periodontally compromised (PCPs) and periodontally healthy (PHPs) patients. Methods: A total of 120 patients were evaluated for the radiographic crestal BL around dental implants and adjacent teeth at time of implant crown insertion and at the 10‐year follow‐up. Sixty patients had a previous history of periodontitis (PCPs), and the remaining 60 were PHPs. In each category (PCP and PHP), two different implant systems were used. The mean BL change at the implant and at the adjacent tooth at the interproximal area was calculated by subtracting the radiographic crestal BL at the time of crown cementation from the radiographic crestal BL at the 10‐year follow‐up. Results: At 10 years after therapy, the survival rate ranged from 80% to 95% for subgroups for implants, whereas it was 100% for the adjacent teeth. In all eight different patient categories evaluated, teeth demonstrated a significantly more stable radiographic BL compared with adjacent dental implants (teeth BL, 0.44 ± 0.23 mm; implant BL, 2.28 ± 0.72 mm; P <0.05). Radiographic BL changes around teeth seemed not to be influenced by the presence or absence of advanced bone loss (≥3 mm) at the adjacent implants. Conclusions: Natural teeth yielded better long‐term results with respect to survival rate and marginal BL changes compared with dental implants. Moreover, these findings also extend to teeth with an initial reduced periodontal attachment level, provided adequate periodontal treatment and maintenance are performed. As a consequence, the decision of tooth extraction attributable to periodontal reasons in favor of a dental implant should be carefully considered in partially edentulous patients.     

Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results

Previous studies have demonstrated in short‐term experiments that a sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) titanium implant had a greater bone‐to‐implant contact than a titanium plasma‐sprayed (TPS) implant in non‐oral bone. In the present study, an SLA implant was compared radiographically to a TPS implant under unloaded and loaded conditions in the canine mandible for up to 15 months. 69 implants were placed in 6 foxhounds. Standardized radiographs were taken at baseline, preload, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of loading. Loaded implants were restored with gold crowns similar to the natural dentition. Radiographic assessment of the bone response to the implants was carried out by measuring the distance between the implant shoulder and the most coronal bone‐to‐implant contact (DIB) and by evaluation of bone density changes using computer‐assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). 5 different areas‐of‐interest (AOI) were defined coronally and apically along the implant. DIB measurements revealed that SLA implants had significantly less bone height loss (0.52mm) than TPS implants (0.69mm) at the preload evaluation ( p =0.0142) as well as at 3 months of loading (0.73mm/1.06mm: p =0.0337). This difference was maintained between the implant types during the 1‐year follow‐up period. The same trend was also evident for CADIA measurements with SLA implants showing higher crestal bone density values when comparing preload to baseline data ( p =0.0890) and 3 months to baseline data ( p =0.0912). No measurable bone density changes were apparent in the apical areas of either implant. These results suggest that SLA implants are superior to TPS implants as measured radiographically in oral bone under unloaded and loaded conditions.     

In-patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months

Objectives: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in the mandibular molar sites and immediately functionally restored compared with conventionally loaded controls in an in‐patient study. Material and methods: Twenty‐four dental implants were placed in 12 patients who had first molar loss bilaterally in the mandibular area. One site of the patient was determined as immediately loaded (IL) and the other side was conventionally loaded (CL). Resonance frequency analyses for implant stability measurements, radiographic examinations for marginal bone levels and peri‐implant evaluations were performed during the clinical follow‐up appointments within 12 months. Results: During the 12‐month follow‐up period, only one implant was lost in the IL group. The mean implant stability quotient values were 74.18±5.72 and 75.18±3.51 for Groups IL and CL at surgery, respectively, and the corresponding values were 75.36±5.88 and 75.64±4.84 at 1‐year recall, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant between the two groups during the 12‐month study period (P>0.05). When peri‐implant parameters were evaluated, excellent peri‐implant health was demonstrated during the 1‐year observation period and all implants showed less than 1 mm of marginal bone resorption during the first year. Conclusions: In the present study, immediate functionally loading did not negatively affect implant stability, marginal bone levels and peri‐implant health when compared with conventional loading of single‐tooth implants.     

Transmucosal healing around peri‐implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogs

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the transmucosal healing response of implants placed with the junction of the smooth surfaces, either crestal or subcrestal, into simulated extraction defects after healing periods of 1 and 3 months. Materials and methods: A total of 23 Straumann SP ?3.3 mm NN, SLA^® 10 mm implants were placed in the mandibular premolar regions of three greyhound dogs 3 months after the teeth were removed. Five control implants were placed at the crestal bone level, and test implants with surgically created peri‐implant defects of 1.25 mm wide × 5 mm depth were placed either at the crestal (nine implants) or at the 2 mm subcrestal (nine implants) bone level. Implants on the right side were placed 1 month before the dogs were sacrificed, and implants on the left side were placed 3 months before sacrifice. All dogs had daily plaque control following surgery and were sacrificed 3 months after implant placement for histological and histometric analyses. Results: Mesial–distal ground sections of the control and test implant specimens showed a greater %BIC in the coronal defect region after 3 months of healing. This healing response was incomplete for the test implants compared with the control implants after a 1‐month healing period. The histometric measurements for test implants placed at the crestal bone level or 2 mm subcrestal with surgically created peri‐implant defects were more coronal or closer to the implant margin compared with the control implants. Additionally, the degree of osseointegration between the newly formed bone and the implant surface was similar between the test implants. Conclusion: Peri‐implant defects of 1.25 mm width healed with spontaneous bone regeneration around implants placed transmucosally at crestal or 2 mm subcrestal with a high degree of osseointegration after a 3‐month healing period. To cite this article:
Tran BLT, Chen ST, Caiafa A, Davies HMS, Darby IB. Transmucosal healing around peri‐implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 794–803.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01911.x     

Clinical and histologic findings for microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for three months: a case report

Background: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading. Purpose: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth‐surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing. Materials and Methods: Five one‐piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc. Results: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone‐to‐implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone‐to‐implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone‐to‐implant contact. Conclusions: Within the limits of this case report, smooth‐surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone‐to‐implant contact. The amount of bone‐to‐implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.     

Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.

BACKGROUND: Endosseous implants can be placed according to a non-submerged or submerged approach and in 1- or 2-piece configurations. Recently, it was shown that peri-implant crestal bone changes differ significantly under such conditions and are dependent on a rough/smooth implant border in 1-piece implants and on the location of an interface (microgap) between the implant and abutment/restoration in 2-piece configurations. Several factors may influence the resultant level of the crestal bone under these conditions, including movements between implant components and the size of the microgap (interface) between the implant and abutment. However, no data are available on the impact of possible movements between these components or the impact of the size of the microgap (interface). The purpose of this study was to histometrically evaluate crestal bone changes around unloaded, 2-piece non-submerged titanium implants with 3 different microgap (interface) dimensions and between implants with components welded together or held together by a transocclusal screw. METHODS: A total of 60 titanium implants were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 hounds forming 6 different implant subgroups (A through F). In general, all implants had a relatively smooth, machined suprabony portion 1 mm long, as well as a rough, sandblasted, and acid-etched (SLA) endosseous portion, all placed with their interface (microgap) 1 mm above the bone crest level and having abutments connected at the time of first-stage surgery. Implant types A, B, and C had a microgap of < 10 microns, approximately 50 microns, or approximately 100 microns between implant components as did types D, E, and F, respectively. As a major difference, however, abutments and implants of types A, B, and C were laser-welded together, not allowing for any movements between components, as opposed to types D, E, and F, where abutments and implants were held together by abutment screws. Three months after implant placement, all animals were sacrificed. Non-decalcified histology was analyzed histometrically by evaluating peri-implant crestal bone changes. RESULTS: For implants in the laser-welded group (A, B, and C), mean crestal bone levels were located at a distance from the interface (IF; microgap) to the first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC) of 1.06 +/- 0.46 mm (standard deviation) for type A, 1.28 +/- 0.47 mm for type B, and 1.17 +/- 0.51 mm for type C. All implants of the non-welded group (D, E, and F) had significantly increased amounts of crestal bone loss, with 1.72 +/- 0.49 mm for type D (P < 0.01 compared to type A), 1.71 +/- 0.43 mm for type E (P < 0.02 compared to type B), and 1.65 +/- 0.37 mm for type F (P < 0.01 compared to type C). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate, as evaluated by non-decalcified histology under unloaded conditions in the canine mandible, that crestal bone changes around 2-piece, non-submerged titanium implants are significantly influenced by possible movements between implants and abutments, but not by the size of the microgap (interface). Thus, significant crestal bone loss occurs in 2-piece implant configurations even with the smallest-sized microgaps (< 10 microns) in combination with possible movements between implant components.     

Biologic width changes around loaded implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone: histometric evaluation in canine mandible

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate histometric changes around dental implants inserted at different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different loading conditions. Material and methods: Thirty‐six implants were inserted in the edentulous mandible of six mongrel dogs. Each implant was assigned to an experimental group according to the distance from the top of the implant to the crestal bone: Bone Level (at the crestal bone level), Minus 1 (1 mm below the crestal bone) or Minus 2 group (2 mm below the crestal bone). Each hemimandible was submitted to a loading protocol: conventional or immediate restoration. After 90 days, the animals were killed. Specimens were processed, and measurements were performed concerning the length of soft and hard peri‐implant tissues. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Student's t test (α=5%). Results: Among conventionally restored sites, the distance from the most coronal position of soft tissue margin (PSTM) and first bone–implant contact (fBIC) was greater for Minus 2 than for Bone Level and Minus 1 sites (P=0.03), but significant differences were not observed among immediately restored sites. Differences among groups were not observed concerning the PSTM, and the distance from the implant–abutment junction to fBIC. Greater amounts of lateral bone loss were observed for conventionally than for immediately restored sites (P=0.006). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the apical positioning of the top of the implant may not jeopardize the position of soft peri‐implant tissues, and that immediate restoration can be beneficial to minimize lateral bone loss. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the clinical significance of these results in longer healing periods.     

Effect of interimplant distance (2 and 3 mm) on the height of interimplant bone crest: a histomorphometric evaluation

Background: Implants restored according to a platform‐switching concept (implant abutment interface with a reduced diameter relative to the implant platform diameter) present less crestal bone loss than implants restored with a standard protocol. When implants are placed adjacent to one another, this bone loss may combine through overlapping, thereby causing loss of the interproximal height of bone and papilla. The present study compares the effects of two interimplant distances (2 and 3 mm) on bone maintenance when bone‐level implants with platform‐switching are used. Methods: This study evaluates marginal bone level preservation and soft tissue quality around a bone‐level implant after 2 months of healing in minipig mandibles. The primary objective is to evaluate histologically and histomorphometrically the affect that an implant design with a horizontally displaced implant–abutment junction has on the height of the crest of bone, between adjacent implants separated by two different distances. Results: Results show that the interproximal bone loss measured from the edge of the implant platform to the bone crest was not different for interimplant distances of 2 or 3 mm. The horizontal position of the bone relative to the microgap on platform level (horizontal component of crestal bone loss) was 0.31 ± 0.3 mm for the 2‐mm interimplant distance and 0.57 ± 0.51 mm above the platform 8 weeks after implantation for the 3‐mm interimplant distance. Conclusions: This study shows that interimplant bone levels can be maintained at similar levels for 2‐ and 3‐mm distances. The horizontally displaced implant–abutment junction provided for a more coronal position of the first point of bone–implant contact. The study reveals a smaller horizontal component at the crest of bone than has been reported for non‐horizontally displaced implant–abutment junctions.     

Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implant: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around implants with two different types of tapered internal implant–abutment interface (IAI): tapped‐in (TI) tapered internal IAI and screwed‐in (SI) tapered internal IAI in dogs. Methods: The second, third, and fourth premolars and the first molar in mandibles of six beagle dogs were extracted. After 8 weeks, two SI implants and two TI implants were placed in one side of the mandible. There were four experimental groups: 1) SI placed crestally (SIC); 2) TI placed crestally (TIC); 3) SI placed 1.5 mm subcrestally (SIS); and 4) TI placed 1.5 mm subcrestally (TIS). Healing abutments were connected 12 weeks after implant surgery. Implants and teeth were brushed every second day during the healing period. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at 4, 10, and 16 weeks after second‐stage surgery. Results: Differences between SI and TI implants inserted in the same vertical position were not significant for peri‐implant probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), or bone resorption (P >0.05). Subcrestal placement of both implants had greater PD and CAL compared to crestal groups. However, distance from IAI to the first bone–implant contact was lower in subcrestal groups compared to crestal groups (1.27 ± 0.42 mm for SIC versus 0.46 ± 0.26 mm for SIS, P <0.05; 1.36 ± 0.31 mm for TIC versus 0.78 ± 0.42 mm for TIS, P <0.05). Conclusions: Tapered internal IAI configuration had no significant effect on crestal bone resorption. Moreover, subcrestal placement of tapered internal IAI had a positive impact on crestal bone preservation around the cervix of the implant.     

A radiographic assessment of progressive loading on bone around single osseointegrated implants in the posterior maxilla

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this clinical study was to determine the effectiveness of progressive loading procedures on preserving crestal bone height and improving peri-implant bone density around maxillary implants restored with single premolar crowns by an accurate longitudinal radiographic assessment technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three HA-coated, endosseous dental implants were placed in 20 subjects and permitted to heal for 5 months before surgical uncovering. The implants were randomly assigned to either an experimental or control group. Following a conventional healing period, the control group implants were restored with a metal ceramic crown and the experimental group implants underwent a progressive loading protocol. The experimental group was progressively loaded by increasing the height of the occlusal table in increments from a state of infraocclusion to full occlusion by adding acrylic resin to a heat-processed acrylic crown. The progressively loaded crowns were placed in infraocclusion for the first 2 months, light occlusion for the second 2 months, and full occlusion for the third 2 months. At this point, a metal ceramic crown replaced the acrylic crown. Standardized radiographs of each implant were made at the time of restoration, then after 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months of function. Digital image analysis and digital subtraction radiography were used to measure changes in crestal bone height and peri-implant bone density. RESULTS: The mean values of crestal bone height loss at 12 months were 0.2+/-0.27 mm for the progressively loaded implants and 0.59+/-0.27 for the conventionally loaded implants, and when tested with repeated-measure ANOVA across the time periods, the differences were statistically significant (P< or =0.05). The progressively loaded group showed a trend for higher bone density gain in the crestal area than the conventionally loaded group, but the conventionally loaded group showed a trend for higher bone density gain at the apex of the implants. CONCLUSION: The peri-implant bone around progressively loaded implants demonstrates less crestal bone loss than the bone around implants placed conventionally into full function. The peri-implant density measurements of the progressively loaded implants show continuous increase in peri-implant bone density by time.     

Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone maintenance around tissue level implant and bone level implant: a randomised controlled trial. A 1‐year follow‐up

The etiologic factors associated with crestal bone loss have not been comprehensively clarified. Several theories exist as to the reason for the observed changes in crestal bone height following implant restoration. In the 1990s, the wide‐diameter implants were commercially introduced. Initially, the implants were restored with standard‐diameter abutments because of lack of matching prosthetic components. Long‐term radiographic follow‐up of these ‘platform‐switched’ restored wide‐diameter dental implants has demonstrated a smaller‐than‐expected vertical change in the crestal bone height around these implants that is typically observed around implants restored conventionally with prosthetic components of matching diameters. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to assess radiographically marginal bone level alterations in implants restored according to the platform‐switching concept compared with traditionally restored implants. Fifty‐four subjects to participate in this randomised controlled study were selected. Two groups were assigned at random: control group (56 implants were restored with standard matching‐diameter abutments) and test group (58 implants were restored with medialised abutments). X‐ray explorations were taken for peri‐implant bone level at the minute the last cementing of the prosthesis and at 1‐year follow‐up. NHI Image was used to digitally process and manipulate the radiographic images and perform the measurements. Mean of bone loss with platform‐switching implants was ?0·01 mm, and the mean of bone loss with standard platform implant was 0·42 mm. Outcomes of this study indicated that the platform‐switching design could preserve the crestal bone levels to 1‐year follow‐up. There was a statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss.     

In-patient comparison of immediately loaded and non-loaded implants within 6 months

Abstract: According to the Brånemark protocol, a stress‐free healing period is one of the most emphasised requirements for implant integration. Recent studies have encouraged a progressive shortening of the healing period and immediate loading has been proposed for the edentulous mandible. This prospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of 14 immediately loaded FRIALIT‐2^® implants compared with 28 non‐loaded controls in an in‐patient study. The results were based on clinical stability and on changes of bone level from implant placement to abutment connection 6 months after insertion. In the course of our investigation, seven patients with edentulous mandibles have been treated with 43 implants following an immediate‐loading protocol. Six FRIALIT‐2^® implants were placed in the interforaminal region located at positions 34, 33, 32, 42, 43, 44. Bone level in relation to implant margin was measured and recorded. In order to obtain an in‐patient comparison of immediately loaded and non‐loaded implants, the ones at 33 and 43 were chosen to be immediately loaded by a Dolder‐bar retained overdenture. The implants in position 32, 34, 42 and 44 were covered and left to heal. After a healing period of 6 months, second stage surgery was carried out. The clinical criteria to be checked at this point were survival, Periotest values and marginal bone level at the loaded and non‐loaded implants. The mean Periotest value was ?2.7 for the loaded and ?5.6 for the non‐loaded implants. The Mann–Whitney U‐test showed that the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). The mean bone level changes at prosthetic delivery were 0.9 mm resorption for the loaded implants and 0.33 mm for non‐loaded implants. The difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). No implant failures were observed up to the prosthetic restoration 6 months post insertion. The results of this investigation allowed for direct comparison of implant survival and clinical results between immediately loaded implants and standard implants. Clinical bone changes at the 6‐month evaluation demonstrated significantly higher crestal resorption around loaded implants. This fact was confirmed by higher median Periotest values (?3 vs. ?6) of immediately loaded implants. According to the outcome of this study, immediate loading of two interforaminal implants with a Dolder‐bar resulted in an intimate bone apposition comparable with implants with submerged healing. Nevertheless, the coronal bone level as well as clinical stability (PTV) were significantly lower in the case of the immediately loaded implants. Future studies will be necessary to evaluate marginal bone resorption, Periotest values and clinical success rates of mandibular immediately loaded implants in the long‐term.     

Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies demonstrated that peri-implant crestal hard and soft tissues are significantly influenced in their apico-coronal position by the rough/smooth implant border as well as the microgap/ interface between implant and abutment/restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the crestal bone level changes around two types of implants, one with a 2.8 mm smooth machined coronal length and the other with 1.8 mm collar. METHODS: In 68 patients, a total of 201 non-submerged titanium implants (101 with a 1.8 mm, 100 with a 2.8 mm long smooth coronal collar) were placed with their rough/smooth implant border at the bone crest level. From the day of surgery up until 3 years after implant placement crestal bone levels were analyzed digitally using standardized radiographs. RESULTS: Bone remodeling was most pronounced during the unloaded, initial healing phase and did not significantly differ between the two types of implants over the entire observation period (P >0.20). Crestal bone loss for implants placed in patients with poor oral hygiene was significantly higher than in patients with adequate or good plaque control (P <0.005). Furthermore, a tendency for additional crestal bone loss was detected in the group of patients who had been diagnosed with aggressive periodontitis prior to implant placement (P = 0.058). In both types of implants, sand-blasted, large grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaced implants tended to have slightly less crestal bone loss compared to titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surfaced implants, but the difference was not significant (P >0.30). CONCLUSION: The implant design with the shorter smooth coronal collar had no additional bone loss and may help to reduce the risk of an exposed metal implant margin in areas of esthetic concern.