Psychosocial correlates of symptoms in functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Psychosocial factors may influence both symptom generation and reporting in functional dyspepsia. We determined the presence and severity of these factors as well as their relationship to dyspeptic symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia and healthy subjects. METHODS: A total of 151 consecutive patients with functional dyspepsia referred chiefly from primary care clinics and 90 healthy subjects rated 15 dyspeptic symptoms. Participants completed the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 and Symptom Checklist-90-revised. RESULTS: Functional dyspepsia patients reported significantly higher symptom scores, poorer quality of life, and greater psychiatric distress than healthy subjects. For both patients and healthy subjects, increasing symptom scores were associated with significant decreases in the Physical but not the Mental Components Summary of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. Although functional dyspepsia patients showed significantly greater psychiatric distress than healthy subjects, symptoms were correlated only modestly with scores on the Symptom Checklist-90-revised. A number of symptoms showed significant but modest correlations ( r s < .30) with the somatization scale with chest burning correlating most strongly ( r s = .48). Chest burning also was correlated significantly with depression, anxiety, and phobic anxiety. Functional dyspepsia patients at a secondary level of care have greater symptom severity, poorer quality of life, and greater psychiatric distress than healthy subjects. Increasing symptom severity is associated with poorer quality of life primarily in the areas of physical and social functioning. With the exception of chest burning, symptoms are not correlated highly with psychiatric distress. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that although functional dyspepsia patients experience increased psychiatric distress, symptom severity and psychiatric distress are not associated strongly.     

Predominant symptom behavior in patients with persistent dyspepsia during treatment

BACKGROUND: Grouping of patients based on a predominant dyspeptic symptom is frequently employed in management strategies for dyspepsia. Such subdivision, however, suggests that dyspeptic symptom patterns are constant over time. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the behavior of symptoms over time and to study the effects of diagnostic procedures and treatment on the pattern and severity of dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: Patients with persistent dyspeptic symptoms completed a validated questionnaire at regular time intervals as part of a clinical trial in primary care. Based on predominant symptoms, patients were classified into ulcer-like dyspepsia, reflux-like dyspepsia, dysmotility-like dyspepsia, and unspecific dyspepsia according to the Rome II criteria. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months by 185, 172, 169, and 170 patients, respectively. At baseline, 35% of patients reported predominantly reflux-like dyspepsia, 34% had ulcer-like dyspepsia, 16% had dysmotility-like dyspepsia, and in 15% symptoms were not specific. During the 6-month follow-up period, only 35% of patients kept the same predominant symptom. Symptom (in)stability was not dependent on diagnostic procedures or on therapy with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists, prokinetics, or antacids. CONCLUSION: In the majority of dyspeptic patients, symptoms change continuously as time goes on. Symptom instability is not influenced by diagnostic procedures or therapy. Thus, there is little sense in symptom-based management of dyspepsia in primary care.     

A community-based, controlled study of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dyspepsia is common in clinical practice and in the community. The relationship of the symptoms to meals and the pathophysiology in community dyspeptic patients is unclear. The purpose of this study was to measure symptoms, demographic features, and gastric motor and sensory functions associated with dyspepsia in the community. METHODS: A Modified Bowel Disease Questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of Olmsted County, MN, residents. Dyspeptic patients and healthy controls identified among community respondents completed further questionnaires, Helicobacter pylori serology, gastric emptying by scintigraphy, gastric accommodation by 99mTc-single-photon emission computed tomography imaging, and postprandial symptoms and satiation by a nutrient drink test. RESULTS: A total of 34.1% of community respondents reported dyspepsia within the past year, frequent (at least 25% of the time in the past year) in 17.5%, and 18.4% reported meal-related dyspepsia. Dyspepsia was frequent and related to meals in 10.8% of respondents. Compared with nondyspeptic controls, community dyspepsia was associated with higher aggregate symptom scores and bloating after a fully satiating meal. Community dyspepsia also was associated with higher somatization scores (P = .001), reporting of other somatic symptoms (P = .07), and general severity score on the symptom checklist 90 (P = .01), but not with disordered motor or sensory function. Gastric volumes, gastric emptying, and maximum tolerated volumes were not significantly different between community controls and dyspeptic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Meal-related dyspepsia is an important component of dyspepsia in the community. Community dyspeptic patients have higher symptom scores after a fully satiating meal, consistent with gastric hypersensitivity. This is associated with higher somatization scores rather than disorders of gastric emptying or volumes.     

Measuring dyspepsia: a new severity index validated in Bologna

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the severity of dyspepsia symptoms before and after treatment and determining what is a significant change is a major problem in designing dyspepsia treatment studies. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reproducibility, validity and responsiveness to treatment of a dyspepsia questionnaire to be used in clinical and population-based studies. METHODS: Seventy-three dyspeptic patients (35 male, 38 female; mean age 52 years) and 75 healthy volunteers (32 male, 43 female; mean age 52 years) were included. Subjects were interviewed for the presence/absence and severity/frequency of 19 gastrointestinal symptoms. Severity was measured on a 5-point scale. Frequency was also recorded on a 5-point scale. A global symptom index (severity x frequency) was calculated for the eight most severe symptoms; a mean global symptom index (8-MGSI) was considered for the evaluation of the instrument. To evaluate intra-observer variation, one author interviewed subjects (T0) and then repeated the interview 1 week later (T1). For inter-observer variation, two authors interviewed patients. Validity was measured by comparing 8-MGSI of the dyspepsia patients to those of healthy volunteers. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing mean global symptom index before and 1 month after appropriate therapy. RESULTS: Reproducibility: The mean 8-MGSI was 4.5 at T0 and 3.7 at T1 with a correlation coefficient of 0.62. As for inter-observer variation, the average 8-MGSI was 4.8 by the first author and 3.9 by the second with a correlation coefficient of 0.60. Validity: The mean 8-MGSI was, respectively, 1.4 in healthy volunteers and 4.8 in dyspeptic patients (p = 0.001). Responsiveness: After treatment, a significant improvement in 8-MGSI was detected (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire is a reliable, valid and responsive instrument for measuring the presence, severity and frequency of dyspepsia.     

Patients with dyspepsia benefit from eradication of Helicobacter pylori if other organic causes for dyspepsia were carefully ruled out

AIM: In order to investigate the potential of Helicobacter pylori (HP) to induce dyspepsia, we performed a randomized prospective study on the long-term effect of HP-eradication on symptoms of HP-positive dyspeptic patients in whom other organic causes for dyspepsia were carefully ruled out. PATIENTS: 201 patients referred to our endoscopy unit with dyspeptic symptoms for at least six months entered the study. Patients with previous peptic ulcer were excluded. METHODS: After endoscopy of the upper alimentary tract and 13C-urea breath test, patients with active peptic ulcer, hiatal hernia, macroscopic evidence for esophagitis and negative HP-status were excluded. The remaining patients underwent abdominal sonography, H2-exhalation test with lactose, and 24-h pH monitoring in order to exclude other organic causes for dyspepsia. In 20 patients, dyspepsia was assumed to be due to HP-gastritis. Patients received eradication therapy and were controlled as assessed by the 13C-urea breath test six weeks and six months after completion of the therapy. Dyspeptic symptoms were monitored by means of a validated symptom score. RESULTS: Out of 20 patients with HP-gastritis the first eradication treatment was successful in 13, while seven patients remained HP-positive after antibiotic treatment. Six months after completion of therapy the symptoms of HP-eradicated patients improved considerably (score values 17.4 +/- 1.5 and 10.2 +/- 0.8, respectively, p < 0.01) whereas symptoms of patients with persistent infection remained unchanged (21.1 +/- 1.7 and 20.4 +/- 1.5, n.s.) and only improved after successful retherapy (20.4 +/- 1.5 and 11.7 +/- 2.1, p < 0.05). In total, 17 of 20 patients (85%) improved after successful eradication. Also, neutrophil infiltration in the gastric mucosa correlated to both dyspeptic symptoms before therapy (r = 0.85) and the decrease in symptom score after HP-eradication (r = 0.61). In contrast, the symptoms of eight patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were not improved after eradication (20.0 +/- 1.1 and 18.2 +/- 1.0, n.s.) CONCLUSIONS: HP-infection per se contributes to dyspepsia. 17 of 20 (85%) HP-positive dyspeptic patients improved after HP-eradication, when other potential organic causes for dyspepsia had been ruled out. However, many patients did not completely recover but the symptoms only partly decreased which parallels the persistence of part of the inflammatory infiltration in the gastric mucosa. This emphasizes the importance of HP-gastritis as an organic disease causing dyspeptic symptoms.     

Development and Validation of a Cross-Cultural Questionnaire to Evaluate Nonulcer Dyspepsia: The Porto Alegre Dyspeptic Symptoms Questionnaire (PADYQ)

Despite its high prevalence, nonulcer dyspepsia is still difficult to study, due to the lack of adequate tools to measure significant outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a symptom-focused, disease-specific questionnaire to evaluate patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. For that, the questionnaire was carefully written following widely accepted terminology, so as to facilitate translation and validation in other languages and cultures. The questionnaire was developed using Rome I terminology for symptoms, which were evaluated according to their intensity, duration, and frequency when applicable. Thirty-one patients with nonulcer dyspepsia, as well as 31 sex-and age-matched volunteers without digestive problems were used to assess the internal consistency, reproducibility, responsiveness, content validity, and discriminant validity of the questionnaire. Another 31 functional dyspeptic patients were enrolled for assessment of criterion validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.82. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the scores obtained 7 days apart was 0.86. The mean score obtained after 3 months of treatment was 16.4, vs. 23.03 at baseline (P = 0.001). Two blinded gastroenterologists agreed that the questionnaire adequately evaluated nonulcer dyspepsia. The median symptoms score for controls was 0, vs. 22.5 for dyspeptic patients (P = 0.001). An inverse correlation was observed between quality of life and dyspeptic symptoms (R = -0.28, P = 0.026). The proposed questionnaire has high degrees of both reproducibility and responsiveness. As this questionnaire was based on Rome I International Consensus terminology, it is expected that it will be easy to translate and validate.     

Peptide YY3-36 and glucagon-like peptide-1 in functional dyspepsia. Secretion and role in symptom generation

Objective The role of peptide YY3-36 (PYY3-36), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and glucose homoeostasis in symptom development in functional dyspepsia (FD) is unclear. The aim was to investigate postprandial changes in plasma PYY3-36, GLP-1, glucose and insulin, and the relationship between PYY3-36, GLP-1, dyspeptic symptoms, and satiety measurements. Materials and methods Thirty-six patients with functional dyspepsia and 18 healthy controls consumed a liquid meal at two occasions. Firstly, a fixed amount of 250 mL (300 kcal) was consumed and gastric emptying was assessed using the paracetamol method. Secondly, participants drank 75 mL (90 kcal) per five min until maximal satiety. PYY3-36, GLP-1, glucose, and insulin concentrations were assessed. Satiety measures and dyspeptic symptoms were registered using visual analogue scales. Results Gastric emptying, glucose, PYY3-36, and GLP-1 concentrations were similar in patients and controls. Patients with epigastric pain syndrome had higher postprandial insulin levels. Patients reported more satiety, nausea, and pain. Area under the curve (AUC) for GLP-1 correlated positively to nausea in patients and negatively to nausea in controls during a single meal. AUC for PYY3-36 correlated similarly to sensation of fullness in the two groups; however, the correlation was negative for the single meal and positive for the satiety test. Conclusions In epigastric pain syndrome, postprandial insulin secretion seems to be increased. Neither GLP-1 nor PYY3-36 secretion is altered in functional dyspepsia, but postprandial GLP-1 secretion seems to correlate with nausea and PYY3-36 to the sensation of fullness, and therefore, these hormones might be involved in symptom generation.     

Fluctuation in dyspepsia subgroups over time. A three-year follow-up of patients consulting general practice for dyspepsia

BACKGROUND: General practitioners base their treatment and investigation on the symptoms presented by the patients. Subgroups of dyspepsia have been defined in order to guide management. AIM: To study prospectively changes over time in the presentation of dyspepsia according to different subtypes in a general practitioner population. SUBJECTS: Patients consulting the general practitioner because of dyspeptic complaints. METHODS: A random sample of general practitioner patients consulting with different dyspepsia subtypes (ulcer-like, reflux-like, dysmotility-like, uncharacteristic and relapsing dyspepsia) were studied three years after the initial consultation by postal questionnaires to the general practitioners (obtaining information from the patient records) and to the patients (obtaining self-reported symptoms during twelve months). The subtype of dyspepsia at baseline was compared to the subtype in the patient questionnaire. RESULTS: Between 20 and 34% of the patients reported no dyspepsia after three years, with so significant difference between the subtypes. Changes from one subtype to another were common, ulcer-like and reflux-like often changed into dysmotility-like dyspepsia. Dysmotility-like dyspepsia was significantly more stable over time. Patients with more than one episode of dyspepsia changed subtype significantly less. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who presented with dyspepsia to the general practitioner still reported symptoms three years later. Few patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia changed subtype over time, whereas changes from one subtype to another were common in other subtypes. This implies that dyspeptic patients could end up having dysmotility-like complaints possibly due to the lack of effective treatment for this condition, compared to the other dyspepsia subtypes.     

Role of autonomic dysfunction in patients with functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND: The role of autonomic dysfunction in patients with functional dyspepsia is not completely understood. AIMS: 1. to prospectively assess abnormalities of autonomic function in patients with functional dyspepsia, 2. to assess whether autonomic dysfunction in these patients is associated with a. visceral hypersensitivity or b. delayed gastric emptying or c. severity of dyspeptic symptoms. PATIENTS: A series of 28 patients with functional dyspepsia and 14 healthy volunteers without gastrointestinal symptoms were studied. METHODS: All patients and controls were submitted to a battery of five standard cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests, dyspeptic questionnaire, gastric barostat tests and gastric emptying tests. RESULTS: 1. Autonomic function tests showed that both sympathetic and parasympathetic scores of dyspeptic patients were significantly higher than in controls; 2. visceral hypersensitivity was confirmed in dyspeptics in response to proximal gastric distension, demonstrating lower pain threshold; 3. delayed gastric emptying occurred more frequently in patients with functional dyspepsia than in controls; 4. epigastric pain and epigastric burning were significantly more prevalent in patients with definite evidence of autonomic dysfunction; 5. No significant association was found between presence of autonomic dysfunction and presence of visceral hypersensitivity or presence of delayed gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that a possible role of autonomic dysfunction in eliciting dyspeptic symptoms could not be determined from alterations in visceral hypersensitivity or delayed gastric emptying. Autonomic dysfunction might not be the major explanation for symptoms associated with functional dyspepsia.     

Effect of a gastro-protective agent, rebamipide, on symptom improvement in patients with functional dyspepsia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although mucosal protective agents have been used frequently for treatment of symptomatic gastritis, there has been no well-controlled study of functional dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a 4-week treatment with rebamipide for the relief of overall dyspeptic symptoms and the improvement in quality of life from an untreated baseline in Japanese patients with functional dyspepsia. METHODS: In a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study, 81 patients with functional dyspepsia were recruited and treated with rebamipide (100 mg, t.i.d.) or placebo for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study period by a symptom questionnaire. Quality of life was evaluated by the QPD 32. RESULTS: Data was analyzed for symptoms from 38 patients who received rebamipide and 33 patients who received placebo treatment. Overall symptoms were significantly improved in both the rebamipide and placebo treatment groups from the untreated baseline after 4 weeks of treatment, and the mean changes in overall symptoms were not significantly different between the groups. However, the improvement in symptom score was significantly greater in the treatment arm than in the placebo arm for three items, which were bloating, belching, and pain or discomfort that was relieved after a meal. Regarding quality of life, social restriction and pain intensity were significantly improved in the rebamipide treatment group in per-protocol analysis (P = 0.048 and P = 0.031, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although rebamipide was not significantly better than placebo in reducing overall symptoms by 4 weeks' treatment, it may partially improve the symptoms. It may also be beneficial in improvement of quality of life in Japanese patients with functional dyspepsia.     

Development and evaluation of a modified Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease to distinguish functional dyspepsia from non-erosive reflux disease

Background and Aim: The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) is the standard questionnaire used in Japan for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and assessment of the response to treatment. We modified the FSSG in order to assess dyspepsia symptoms, and evaluated the modified questionnaire. Methods: We modified the FSSG by adding two questions on interdigestive and postprandial epigastric pain. We then assessed the modified FSSG with 100 new untreated symptomatic patients presenting to hospital and in 200 subjects undergoing health checks. Endoscopic assessment of the esophagogastric junction was performed according to the modified Los Angeles classification with addition of Grade N (normal appearance) and Grade M (minimal change). Endoscopic images were assessed by five experienced endoscopists blinded to the questionnaire results. Results: The 100 new patients included 16 with erosive GERD (>Grade A), 12 with peptic ulcer, and two with gastric cancer. Among the 70 patients with no evidence of organic disease, the modified FSSG diagnosed functional dyspepsia (FD) in 41 and non‐erosive gastric disease (NERD) in 29. A significant difference was seen in the dyspepsia score between patients with FD and NERD. Subjects with endoscopic GERD undergoing health checks had significantly higher scores for all symptoms, reflux symptoms, and dyspeptic symptoms on the modified FSSG. Conclusion: The modified FSSG can clearly distinguish FD from NERD, and is useful for the assessment of dyspeptic symptoms.     

Relations between upper abdominal symptoms and gastric distension abnormalities in dysmotility like functional dyspepsia and after vagotomy.

Postprandial bloating and fullness are commonly found both in dysmotility like functional dyspepsia, and after vagotomy but the relation between gastric accommodation and symptom production has not been investigated. Intragastric pressure levels and symptoms developed during controlled distension of the gastric fundus were recorded in nine patients with functional dyspepsia, in seven patients after truncal vagotomy, and in 11 healthy volunteers. The procedure was repeated after ingestion of a liquid nutrient meal (250 ml; 250 kcal). Gastric tone, expressed as the average value of pressure over the distension period was lower in controls (median: 11.3 mm Hg) than in either the dyspeptic patients (median: 16.48 mm Hg) or postvagotomy patients (median: 19.12 mm Hg) (p < 0.05). Meal ingestion reduced gastric tone in controls, but no significant change occurred in either the dyspepsia or the postvagotomy patients. Volumes at which discomfort was elicited by distension during fasting were lower both in dyspeptic patients (median: 210 ml) and in postvagotomy patients (median: 180 ml) than in healthy volunteers (median: 660 ml) (p < 0.05). Discomfort thresholds were unaffected by meal ingestion. These results suggest that a disturbance of gastric relaxation may be related to symptom development in dysmotility like functional dyspepsia, while similarities between dyspeptic patients and postvagotomy patients suggest that the impaired gastric accommodation in functional dyspepsia may be due to an underlying vagal defect.     

Symptoms and pathophysiological correlations in patients with constipation and functional dyspepsia

INTRODUCTION: Patients with constipation often report dyspeptic symptoms, but whether constipation is associated with specific dyspeptic symptoms and altered gastrointestinal (GI) motility, remains to be established. Our aim was to study symptoms association and GI motility parameters in patients with constipation and functional dyspepsia. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 42 patients with different symptoms and severity of constipation and dyspepsia were enrolled. Scintigraphic gastric emptying, colonic transit time and gallbladder contraction were studied in all subjects. RESULTS: No significant association was observed between individual symptoms of constipation and dyspepsia. Patients with more severe constipation did not have higher dyspepsia severity scores. Colonic transit time, gastric half emptying and gallbladder contraction were not significantly correlated. Although patients with severe nausea had faster colonic transit than those with absent/mild symptom (19 +/- 2 vs. 48 +/- 7 h; p < 0.05), the multivariate analysis only revealed a significant association between severe postprandial fullness, delayed t1/2 (OR 1.05, CI 1-1.1) and impaired gallbladder contraction (OR 0.94, CI 0.89-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Constipation was not associated with severity, or any particular dyspeptic symptom. Although motor abnormalities of both colon and proximal GI tract regions existed in the subset of constipated dyspeptic patients, they did not seem associated with the genesis of different dyspeptic symptoms.     

Influence of erythromycin on gastric emptying and meal related symptoms in functional dyspepsia with delayed gastric emptying

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although delayed gastric emptying is considered a major pathophysiological mechanism in functional dyspepsia, the efficacy of prokinetic drugs has not been established. Recent studies using macrolide prokinetics were negative but receptor desensitisation may have played a role. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence on meal induced symptoms of acutely administered erythromycin in patients with gastroparesis. METHODS: In 20 patients with functional dyspepsia, gastric emptying was studied twice using the (14)C octanoic acid and (13)C glycin breath test to establish the reproducibility of the test. Breath samples were taken before the meal and at 15 minute intervals for a period of 240 minutes postprandially. At each breath sampling, the patient was asked to grade the intensity (0-3) of six dyspeptic symptoms. Twenty four patients (three men, mean age 43.5 (3) years) with dyspeptic symptoms and delayed gastric emptying were studied twice after pretreatment with saline or erythromycin intravenously. RESULTS: Meal related symptom severity scores were reproducible. Treatment with erythromycin significantly enhanced solid and liquid gastric emptying (t(1/2) 146 (27) v 72 (7) minutes, respectively (p<0.01), and 87 (6) v 63 (5) minutes (p<0.001)). Only the severity of bloating was significantly improved by erythromycin (23 (3.9) v 14.5 (2.7); p<0.01); all other symptoms and the cumulative meal related symptom score were not altered by erythromycin. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting where desensitisation played no role, erythromycin enhanced gastric emptying was not associated with a beneficial effect on meal related symptom severity.     

In-practice predictors of response to proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care patients with dyspepsia in an Asian population

BACKGROUND: Data on Asian patients who present to primary care physicians with dyspepsia are limited. AIM: To determine predictors of response to a trial of proton pump inhibitor therapy. METHOD: One hundred ninety patients presenting to their general practitioners with dyspeptic symptoms but without alarm symptoms, underwent endoscopy and were subsequently treated with 20 mg of esomeprazole twice a day for 2 weeks. Possible predictors of response were assessed before treatment. Dyspeptic symptoms were scored at baseline and at the end of treatment. Excellent response and poor response were defined as end of treatment score of or=50% reduction in symptom scores. RESULTS: On bivariate analysis male sex and having 2 dyspeptic symptoms, anxiety, and irritable bowel syndrome predicted poor response. On multivariate analysis, male sex and 相似文献   

Helicobacter pylori eradication and standardized 3-month omeprazole therapy in functional dyspepsia

OBJECTIVES: The role of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia remains unclear. This study evaluated the long term consequences for symptoms and quality of life in patients with H. pylori-positive functional dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication therapy with a standardized 3-month omeprazole treatment. METHODS: A total of 151 H. pylori-positive patients with functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive either eradication therapy or placebo-antibiotics. The initial medication was administered in a double-blinded fashion. In addition, to standardize acid suppression, every patient received omeprazole therapy for the first 3-month period. Dyspeptic symptoms were evaluated by a questionnaire every 3 months, and quality of life was measured by a validated RAND 36-item health survey 1.0 questionnaire at the beginning of the study and after 12 months of follow-up. As the main outcome measure, the scores of patients who had received H. pylori eradication therapy and omeprazole were compared with those who received placebo and omeprazole during the 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients completed the 1-yr follow-up. In all, 77 patients received eradication therapy and 74 patients remained as controls. After 12 months, the mean reduction in the dyspepsia score was 28.8% in patients with H. pylori eradication therapy and 21.7% in the control group. The reduction of dyspepsia was significant (p < 0.0001) in both groups compared to baseline value, but no statistically significant differences in changes of dyspeptic symptoms or in quality of life were demonstrated between the H. pylori eradication therapy group and controls after 1 yr. In both patient groups, regurgitation (p < 0.001) and heartburn (p < 0.01) revealed relapse after cessation of 3-month omeprazole treatment. CONCLUSIONS: No clear differences in symptoms or in quality of life were found between patients treated with H. pylori eradication therapy and omeprazole compared with patients receiving placebo and omeprazole after 1 yr. Regardless of H. pylori status, omeprazole treatment reduced heartburn and regurgitation. The placebo effect on the symptoms of functional dyspepsia and on quality of life was marked.     

Gallbladder contractility and volume characteristics in gallstone dyspepsia

AIM:It is difficult to differentiate gallstone dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia by clinical symptoms and signs. We hypothesized that gallstone dyspepsia was related to abnormal gallbladder motility. We aimed to differentiate gallstone dyspepsia from functional dyspepsia by measuring gallbladder motility.METHODS: We measured gallbladder volume changes in response to gastric distension (saline 500mL) and fatty meal in 10normal volunteers (controls) and 62 patients with gallstones and dyspepsia before cholecystectomy. Forty cholecystectomized patients were symptom free or had improvement (group I), while the remaining 22 patients had persistent dyspepsia (group Ⅱ). Gallbladder volume change and ejection fraction were analyzed and compared among the three groups.RESULTS:In group I, there were significant decreases in gallbladder volumes 5-25 rain after gastric distension,compared to fasting volumes. Compared to normal volunteers and group Ⅱ, group I had significantly decreased gallbladder volumes 10-20min after drinking 500mL of normal saline and 10 to 50min after eating fatty meal.CONCLUSION:Our results support the hypothesis that increased gallbladder contraction after gastric distension or fatty meal may be related to dyspeptic symptoms in uncomplicated gallstone disease. These findings may be useful in differentiating functional dyspepsia from gallstone dyspepsia, patients with the latter disease may benefit from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Psychologic aspects of flatulent dyspepsia

Psychologic and social factors have been implicated in the aetiology of dyspepsia. In this study these factors were investigated in relation to flatulent dyspepsia, a symptom complex that has traditionally been associated with gallbladder disease. Subjects completed the Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire and the Life Events Inventory and were interviewed in detail, using a semi-structured format. Three groups of patients with flatulent dyspepsia--those with and without gallbladder disease and post-cholecystectomy--all had significantly more associated somatic symptoms than non-dyspeptic subjects with gallbladder disease or normal controls, thus indicating greater emotional upset amongst dyspeptic patients. There was little evidence that symptoms were related to stressful life events.     

Clinical presentation of Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND: A questionnaire was used to record the clinical presentation of functional dyspepsia in relation to Helicobacter pylori infection in a consecutive series of patients sent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Only patients without macroscopic abnormalities in their oesophagus, stomach and duodenum were included. METHODS: The study questionnaire included two questions related to daily life, and the calculation of a symptom score. Biopsy specimens were taken from all patients for histological and microbiological examination, and immunoglobulin G antibodies were also determined. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were H. pylori positive and 182 patients were H. pylori negative. Loss of weight was significantly more common in the H. pylori positive group (P<0.001). Patients with H. pylori infection had a significantly higher overall symptom score compared with H. pylori-negative subjects (P<0.05). In addition, the severity of epigastric and nocturnal pain, heartburn, retrosternal heartburn, and vomiting was significantly higher in H. pylori-positive functional dyspeptic patients, and the influence on daily life and activities was significantly worse. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of retrosternal pain, weight loss, food intolerance and the absence of halitosis signified a 64% accuracy in predicting H. pylori infection. It is not possible to differentiate between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative functional dyspeptics on the basis of clinical presentation and the number of complaints. However, overall symptom score and severity of several symptoms was significantly higher in the H. pylori-positive group.