Hepatitis virus infection among hemodialysis patients

AIM, PATIENTS AND METHODS: The high prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies (anti-HCV) in hemodialyzed (HD) patients has been recognized since the early 1990s. Over the last decade, a significant decrease of anti-HCV prevalence among HD patients has been observed in many west European countries. In order to evaluate whether this trend is also present in Dialysis Center of Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, we tested HD patients for anti-HCV and HCV RNA in serum. ELISA 3 (Sorin) was used as a screening anti-HCV test, and confirmatory testing relied on western blotting (BioRad). HCV RNA was tested by HCV RNA PCR (Roche) and AMPLICOR, HCV test, version 2.0 (Roche). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The low prevalence of HCV infection is a consequence of the screening of blood donors with increasingly sensitive anti-HCV tests, followed by the progressive reduction of blood transfusion due to the availability of erythropoietin and the reinforcement of universral hygienic precautions and strict infection control in our HD unit. A contributing factor was the prevention of nosocomial transmission by the separation of anti-HCV positive from anti-HCV negative patients. Thus, the low prevalence of HCV infection in our HD center contributes-to an improved prognosis in end stage renal disease patients by additionally reducing the risk of nosocomial HCV infection.     

Low prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies in female hemodialysis patients without blood transfusion: A multicenter analysis

To investigate whether nosocomial infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in chronic hemodialysis patients is related primarily to hemodialysis procedures, a multicenter analysis was carried out on 2,132 chronic hemodialysis patients (male: 1,274, female: 858) from 23 dialysis units using a second-generation anti-HCV antibody assay. The prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in patients with blood transfusion (29.9%) was significantly higher (P < .0001) than in those without blood transfusion (7.6%). Although the prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies increased with the length of hemodialysis in males without blood transfusion, it did not increase even after long-term hemodialysis (more than 5 years) in females without blood transfusion, who exhibited a rate (1.9%) similar to that of healthy blood donors in Japan. There was a significant correlation between the presence of anti-HCV antibodies and anti-HBs antibody in males without blood transfusion. In anti-HBs antibody-negative male patients without blood transfusion, the prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies was significantly lower compared with anti-HBs antibody-positive male patients without blood transfusion. There was marked difference in the prevalence rate in patients without blood transfusion among dialysis units, and there was no correlation between the prevalence and the mean period of dialysis of each dialysis unit. Although nosocomial infection with HCV appears to be related to the hemodialysis environment, the low prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in females suggests that dialysis procedures per se may not present the risk of hepatitis C virus infection. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies improves the early detection of HCV infection

To evaluate whether a new enzyme immunoassay developed for the simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) and anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV Ab) (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad) could improve the early detection of HCV infection, we compared its sensitivity to that of anti-HCV, HCV core Ag, and HCV RNA assays. The populations studied included 12 blood donor samples positive for HCV RNA and HCV core Ag but negative for anti-HCV antibodies and 23 hemodialysis patients who developed anti-HCV Ab (seroconversion) during the follow-up. From these 23 individuals, 83 samples sequentially collected prior to seroconversion and 108 samples collected after seroconversion were tested. Six of 12 blood donations were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab assay. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 24 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative by the HCV Ag/Ab assay and 23 of the 59 HCV RNA-positive samples (39%) were positive. The HCV Ag/Ab assay detected HCV infection on average 21.6 days before the most sensitive antibody assay. The HCV Ag/Ab assay did not detect HCV infection as early as the HCV RNA assay (mean delay, 30.3 days) or HCV Ag assay (mean delays, 27.9, and 16.3 days by the HCV core Ag quantification assay and the HCV Ag blood screening assay, respectively). This new assay provides a notable improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the so-called window period compared with anti-HCV Ab assays and could be a useful alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV core Ag assays for diagnosis or blood screening when nucleic acid technologies or HCV core Ag detection are not implemented.     

Hepatitis C virus infection among dialysis patients in Tunisia: incidence and molecular evidence for nosocomial transmission

In order to study the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Tunisian haemodialysis patients and detect its nosocomial transmission, 395 patients were enrolled in a prospective study (November 2001-2003). HCV serological and virological status was determined initially using, respectively a third generation ELISA and an RT-PCR qualitative assay. The genotype of the HCV isolates was determined by sequencing NS5B region. The issue of nosocomial transmission was addressed by sequencing the HVR-1 region of the E2 gene. About 20% of the patients had anti-HCV antibodies and HCV-RNA was detected in 73% of the anti-HCV positive patients. Two cases of de novo HCV infection were identified in two dialysis centers, during virological follow-up of patients susceptible to HCV infection. The incidence of de novo HCV infection was 0.5%. Determining the genotypes in the first center disclosed that all HCV-positive patients were infected with genotype 1b; sequencing of the HVR-1 region of the E2 gene provided strong evidence that the isolate from the newly infected patient and another infected dialysis patient were closely related, confirming nosocomial contamination. The investigation of the second center is pending. Besides, one patient with negative HCV serology had detectable HCV-RNA at the beginning of the study. This case had HCV genotype 1b, two other infected dialysis patients in the same unit had HCV genotypes 4k and 3a; thus precluding nosocomial transmission. Thanks to molecular and phylogenetic methods, one case of nosocomial HCV transmission in haemodialysis was confirmed. Epidemiological investigation suggested nosocomial transmission via the medical and/or nursing staff.     

Prevalence of anti-HCV and HCV viremia in hemodialysis patients in Taiwan.

Hepatitis C viral infection in 125 hemodialysis patients from Taiwan was studied using a second-generation anti-HCV immunoassay (EIA II) (Abbott HCV 2.0 EIA) and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the HCV RNA in the serum. A total of 59 patients (47.2%) were positive by EIA II. In comparison, the conventional C100-3 anti-HCV assay was positive in 40 (32.0%). HCV RNA was found in 47 patients (37.6%). Patients with elevated serum transaminase level had a higher positive rate of anti-HCV and HCV RNA. The dialysis time was longer for those patients positive for anti-HCV than for those who were negative. A total of 57 of the 59 EIA II-positive cases had a history of blood transfusion. The HBsAg status did not influence the anti-HCV positivity. Among the 59 EIA II-positive patients, 66.1% were also positive for HCV RNA, and of the 47 HCV RNA-positive cases 83.0% were positive for EIA II. It is concluded that the high prevalence of specific HCV infection and HCV viremia was present in these patients. Prevention of cross-contamination during dialysis and blood screening before transfusion are important for the control of HCV infection in these patients.     

Incidence of HCV infection in French hemodialysis units: a prospective study

A large prospective study was carried out from 1997 to 2000 in 25 French hemodialysis units including 1,323 patients to determine the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Monthly testing of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, and assessment of HCV RNA and anti-HCV antibodies if the ALT activity was elevated, identified 14 new infections in 7 different units, giving an incidence of 0.4% new HCV infections per year. Molecular analyses and epidemiological data indicated that five patients became infected with HCV outside the unit where they were dialyzed, while the nine remaining patients acquired HCV from infected patients on dialysis during the same shift at the same unit. HCV was cleared in six of the seven (85.7%) patients with acute hepatitis C who were given standard doses of alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN). The persistence of nosocomial transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units emphasizes the need to implement infection control practices. Identifying new infections is crucial because alpha-IFN treatment results in long term clearance of HCV RNA in a large proportion of patients.     

Molecular and epidemiological study on nosocomial transmission of HCV in hemodialysis patients in Brazil

An epidemiological and molecular study of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was carried out in Brazilian hemodialysis centers. A total of 1,095 patients in all 15 hemodialysis centers in the State of Goiás, Brazil, were studied. All patients were interviewed for possible risk factors to HCV infection and serum samples tested for anti-HCV by ELISA and for HCV RNA by nested RT-PCR of the 5' NC region. For sequence analysis, HCV RNA amplification for the NS5B region (nt 8,279-8,619) was performed. The phylogenetic tree was generated with MrBayes, and clusters with support values above 0.85 were considered epidemiologically related. Of the 1,095 patients, 180 were anti-HCV and/or HCV RNA positive, resulting in an overall prevalence of 16.4% (95% CI: 14.3-18.7). The prevalence of HCV infection in the dialysis centers ranged from 0% to 47.7%. Multivariate analysis of risk factors revealed that history of blood transfusion not screened for anti-HCV and length of time on hemodialysis were independently associated with HCV infection in this population. One hundred six samples could be amplified and sequenced in the NS5B region. Among them, plylogenetic tree analysis revealed that 69 sequences form 13 separated clusters, which were supported by credibility intervals ranging from 85% to 100%, indicating a very close relationship among the HCV isolates and therefore a likely transmission of the virus between patients. By combining phylogenetic analysis with epidemiological data, routes of transmission between the clustered-related-patients could be suggested. These findings provide evidence for nosocomial transmission of HCV in Brazilian hemodialysis centers.     

1年以上血透患者HCV感染状况的调查

目的 研究1年以上的长期血液透析患者丙型肝炎（HCV）感染状况。方法 用ELISA法和RT－PCR法检测137例长期血透患者血清中的抗－HCV和HCVRNA,并且同时检测谷丙转氨酶（ALT）和谷草转氨酶（AST）,计算其变动率。结果 透析时间超过1年以上的137例患者中仅抗－HCV阳性8例,仅HCV－RNA阳性13例,抗－HCV与HCVRNA同时阳性者24例,感染率34．3％。且透析时间小于2年的,HCV感染率为15％,透析时间大于2年以上的其感染率增至37．6％。结论 血透患者中HCV的感染应引起重视,透析的年限越长,被HCV感染的机率就越大。酶学指证的变动率不能作为长期透析患者HCV感染的敏感指标。     

Hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients in southern Sweden: Epidemiological,clinical, and diagnostic aspects

A prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies of 12% was found in 276 patients from 11 dialysis units. Between zero and 22% of the patients in the different units were anti-HCV positive. The epidemiology of HCV was studied in two units during a 2 year period by antibody assays and the polymerase chain reaction and correlated with clinical manifestations. Two types of epidemiologic patterns were found that may explain the wide difference of HCV prevalence described in different dialysis units. In one unit there was no evidence of spread within the unit, and the prevalence of HCV was dependent on the status of the patients entering for treatment. In the other unit, a clustering of infected patients could be seen in which 13 of 36 were infected during a 3 year period. Some patients who had not received blood transfusions were among the infected. Hepatitis C infection was the most common explanation for repeated abnormal transferase levels. Most of the HCV-infected patients reacted both for anti-HCV and HCV RNA. HCV RNA was in general detected earlier than anti-HCV seroconversion. Among 20 HCV RNApositive serum samples that were anti-HCV ELISA-positive 18 had indeterminate and two negative reactions by immunoblot (RIBA 2). Thus the RIBA 2 test should be used with caution as a confirmatory antibody test in this group of patients. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Viral hepatitis in hemodialysis patients

Hemodialysis patients are one of the high-risk groups for viral hepatitis, especially hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection. Although using recombinant human erythropoietin to treat anemia and introducing HCV testing of donated blood have been expected to reduce the incidence of HCV infection, occasional transmission of HCV to hemodialysis patients still occurs. The epidemiological and phylogenetic analysis provides the evidence for nosocomial infection of HCV in hemodialysis units. On the other hand, the discrepancy between results of anti-HCV antibody and HCV RNA is observed in some hemodialysis patients, indicating that the isolation of patients positive for anti-HCV antibody is not effective for the prevention of transmission of HCV. The strict enforcement of universal precaution such as carefully changing gloves should be more important for the prevention of nosocomial infection.     

Molecular epidemiology of a hepatitis C virus outbreak in a hemodialysis unit in Italy

Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study was to investigate a HCV outbreak in a hemodialysis unit using epidemiological and molecular methods. Between April 2003 and October 2003, anti-HCV seronconversion was detected in four patients attending the unit. These cases were added to 10 patients already anti-HCV positive upon admission in the unit. All 14 anti-HCV patients were tested for HCV RNA and HCV genotype. NS5B and HVR1/ E2 genomic regions were amplified and sequenced in all HCV RNA positive patients and phylogenetic analysis was performed. Furthermore, clinical-epidemiological records obtained from all patients were examined. All four patients newly infected harbored genotype 2c. Genotype 2c was also detected in 2 of 10 patients already anti-HCV positive upon admission. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all newly HCV infected patients harbored very closely related viral isolates that clustered together with the 2c isolate found in one of the two 2c chronic infected patients. All HCV-2c infected patients had no other risk factors except hemodialysis. Three of four newly HCV-2c infected patients and the one HCV-2c chronically infected involved in the outbreak received dialysis on the same day and same shift but used different machines. The remaining HCV-2c newly infected patient and one of the above cited three received dialysis on the same day during different shifts but used the same machine. The outbreak was probably due to breaks of infection control procedures although a related-machine transmission cannot be excluded in one of the cases.     

Antibodies to hepatitis C virus in uremic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) among 101 uremic patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was evaluated using a synthetic peptide-based HCV antibodies enzyme immunoassay. Thirty (29.7%) were found anti-HCV positive. This is significantly higher than 500 unselected paid blood donors (4.2%, P less than 0.0001). Among CAPD patients, anti-HCV positivity was found more frequently in patients who had received frequent and longer duration of hemodialysis previously (40.4% vs. 20.4%, P less than 0.05). These findings suggest that hemodialysis patients have a higher risk of HCV infection. At present, CAPD may be a suitable way to reduce the incidence of HCV infection in uremic patients.     

Non-A, non-B hepatitis and anti-HCV antibodies in dialysis patients

To define the prevalence of non-A, non-B hepatitis, antibodies to HCV were detected in 193 patients on renal replacement therapy (52 transplant and 141 hemodialysis patients) and in 50 staff members of a Nephrology Department. Unequivocal seroconversion was documented in 5 transplant (9.6%) and in 26 dialysis patients (18.4%). In the dialysis population, the prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies was evaluated in patients grouped according to the number of blood transfusions and to the different sections of dialytic treatment. The most striking findings were the marked differences in the prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies among patients treated in different sections (from 0% to 70%), and the presence of a significant increase in alanine-amino-transferase (ALT) concentrations in 14 anti-HCV negative patients. The results suggest that the diffusion of non-A, non-B hepatitis is mainly transfusion-related, with the possibility of significant environmental diffusion related to the violation of infection-control measures. The current immunoassay is probably unable to detect the actual frequency of the infection.     

Measurement of antibody avidity for hepatitis C virus distinguishes primary antibody responses from passively acquired antibody

A new IgG antibody avidity test for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been developed and was validated using sera from 12 renal dialysis patients infected with HCV. In primary HCV infection low avidity antibody (mean avidity index 24%) was detected within 50 days of seroconversion whereas in long-term infection (at least 300 days after seroconversion), the mean avidity index was high (88%); in five patients, the avidity index was shown to increase rapidly as time elapsed after primary infection, whereas immunosuppressive therapy was found to delay maturation of the immune reponse in two further patients. The assay was then employed to confirm that a spurious outbreak of primary HCV infection in eight bone marrow transplant patients was explicable by passive acquisition of high avidity anti-HCV after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. It is concluded that this avidity test will have an important role in the investigation of HCV infection in patients. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原在血液透析患者中的检测和应用

目的 探讨丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原酶联免疫吸附法在血液透析患者HCV感染检测中的应用.方法 对本院250名血液透析患者,用第三代酶联免疫吸附试剂盒检测抗.HCV抗体、酶联免疫吸附法检测HCV核心总抗原,用巢式RT-PCR法对阳性标本进行确认.结果 250例血液透析患者中抗-HCV抗体阳性43例(阳性率17.2%),HCV-cAg阳性45例(阳性率18%),经配对x2检验,P=0.839,差异无统计学意义;43例抗-HCV抗体阳性中RT-PCR检测结果 为36例HCV-RNA阳性,其中32例HCV-cAg也呈阳性,另外4例HCV-cAg阴性;45例HCV-cAg阳性标本中HCV-RNA结果 全阳性;13例核心抗原阳性但抗体阴性的患者样本中也含有HCV-RNA,抗-HCV抗体的漏检率为23.2%(13/56);核心抗原阳性标本测出病毒载量是(49258±28682)拷贝/ml,高于抗-HCV抗体阳性组(23938±10780)拷贝/ml(P<0.05);4例核心抗原阴性但抗-HCV抗体及RT-PCR均阳性标本的病毒载量是(306±161)拷贝/ml,明显低于HCV核心抗原阳性组(P<0.001).结论 HCV核心总抗原酶联免疫吸附试验将有益于由于免疫抑制状态、窗口期更长的血液透析患者,与抗-HCV的检测结果 具有互补性;HCV-cAg能很好反映HCV RNA,相对于PCR来说,HCV-cAg检测既具有成本效益好又可减少人力资源,具有广阔的临床应用前景.     

Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis C and B virus infections in hemodialysis patients and their spouses: A multicenter study in Beijing,China

Hemodialysis patients are at risk for hepatitis C and B virus infections. This study investigated the prevalences and risk factors of HCV and HBV infection and the distribution of HCV genotypes among hemodialysis patients and their spouses. From August to November 2011, a cross‐sectional study was conducted on 20 hemodialysis units in Beijing to investigate prevalences and risk factors for markers of HCV and HBV among 2,120 patients and 409 spouses. In hemodialysis patients, prevalences of anti‐HCV, HCV RNA, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were 6.1%, 4.6%, and 7.0%, respectively. The prevalence of HCV antibodies among spouses was 0.5%, of HCV RNA was 0.2%, and of HBsAg was 4.2%. Risk factors for HCV infection were dialysis duration, blood transfusion, and attending more than one dialysis unit. HBV infection was independently associated with age, family member with hepatitis infection, gender, and surgery. The predominant HCV genotypes were 1b (89.0%) and 2a (7.7%), and genotypes 3a, 3b, and 6a were each 1.1%. A significant decrease in HCV and HBV prevalences in Chinese dialysis units showed that infection control measures were effective. However, because nosocomial transmissions persist, strict adherence to infection control measures should be emphasized to reduce the risk of transmission. J. Med. Virol. 85:425–432, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

An archived serum sample as a clue for identifying the primary source of a nosocomial hepatitis C virus outbreak in a haemodialysis unit

Due to an unexpected technical error, patients at a dialysis unit who were seronegative for hepatitis C virus (HCV) were temporarily transferred to another dialysis unit next to a ward reserved for HCV-seropositive patients. In the following 7 months, 17 patients were diagnosed as anti-HCV positive. The aim of the study was to reveal the cause of this nosocomial infection. Anti-HCV-positive sera were further tested by molecular methods. Data collection and on-site epidemiologic inspections were carried out. The source of the nosocomial infection proved to be a seropositive patient treated at the unit, who died before the outbreak was recognized. The exact date of the infection was determined.     

High prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C virus infections among dialysis patients in the East-Centre of Tunisia

Hemodialysed patients are recognised as a group at increased risk of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and incidence of HCV infection among dialysis patients of the east-centre part of Tunisia. Two hundred and seventy-six patients dialysed until 2001 were recruited within seven hemodialysis units located in the cities of Sousse, Monastir and Mahdia. The serum markers of HCV infection were tested over the period of March 2000-December 2002, by a 3rd generation ELISA test for antibodies and by qualitative RT-PCR technique for viral RNA. The prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies and of HCV RNA was 32.6% (90 patients) and 25.7% (71 patients), respectively. Between 1998 and 2002, 20 new infections were documented in five of the seven dialysis units corresponding to an incidence of 2.34% per year, with an average time of contamination after the beginning of dialysis of 4.6 years. If all the infections are assessed to have occurred during dialysis, the density of incidence of HCV contamination was 4.4% per year of dialysis. A high correlation was noticed between the presence of HCV markers in serum and the duration of dialysis (F = 34.15, P < 0.0001). In the absence of other risk factors (transfusion, drug-addiction), these results plead for the nosocomial transmission of the observed HCV infections. A phylogenetic analysis of the E2 hypervariable region of the viral genome is in progress to confirm this assumption.