Splinted and Unsplinted Short Implants in Mandibles: A Retrospective Evaluation With 5 to 16 Years of Follow‐Up

Background: The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the medium‐ to long‐term prognosis of short implants in partially and totally edentulous patients with mandibular bone atrophy. Methods: The study involved 109 patients with 280 implants placed in the mandible. The implants were 7 or 8.5 mm long and 3.75 or 4 mm in diameter. The implant surfaces were machined (M; n = 176) or rough (R; n = 104). Patients were asked to attend a radiographic and clinical follow‐up, and their previous clinical records and radiographs were assessed. Implant‐related and prosthetic failures and complications were recorded. Results: The mean follow‐up was 9 years (range of 5 to 16 years). The survival rate (SSR) and success rate (SR) were calculated using life‐table analysis for both M and R short implants. The M implants had a 16‐year SSR of 95.7% and a corresponding SR of 93.9%, whereas the 16‐year SSR and SR for the R implants were 97.2% and 95.2%, respectively. The mean ± SD bone resorption for all implants was 1.37 ± 0.5 mm. For marginal bone loss, there was no statistically significant difference between the two implant lengths (P = 0.38) or diameters (P = 0.34) or between the M and R implant surfaces (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Different implant lengths, diameters, and surface treatments do not appear to influence the prognosis of the implant. Within the limitation that most of the short implants were splinted to longer implants, the reduced length of the fixtures did not worsen the long‐term survival of the implant‐supported fixed prostheses.     

Immediate Placement of Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Background: Research interest on immediate placement of dental implants has shifted from implant survival toward optimal preservation of soft and hard tissues. The aim of this study is to systematically assess the condition of implant survival, peri‐implant hard and soft tissue changes, esthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction of immediately placed single‐tooth implants in the esthetic zone. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched for publications up to June 2013. Studies reporting on implant survival, changes in hard and soft peri‐implant tissues, esthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction were considered. A pooled analysis was performed to identify factors associated with survival and peri‐implant tissue changes after immediate implant placement. Results: Thirty‐four studies were considered eligible. Immediate placement of single‐tooth implants in the esthetic zone was accompanied by excellent 1‐year implant survival (97.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.958 to 0.980). Mean marginal peri‐implant bone loss was 0.81 ± 0.48 mm, mean loss of interproximal peri‐implant mucosa level was 0.38 ± 0.23 mm, and mean loss of peri‐implant midfacial mucosa level was 0.54 ± 0.39 mm. Regression analysis revealed that delayed provisionalization (odds ratio [OR] 58.03, 95% CI: 8.05 to 418.41, P <0.000), use of a flap (OR 19.87, 95% CI: 10.21 to 38.66, P <0.000), and use of a connective tissue graft (OR 4.56, 95% CI: 1.72 to 12.08, P <0.002) were associated with marginal peri‐implant bone‐level change >0.50 mm. Because of underreporting, esthetic results and patient outcome did not allow for reliable analysis. Conclusion: Immediate placement with immediate provisionalization of dental implants in the esthetic zone results in excellent short‐term treatment outcome in terms of implant survival and minimal change of peri‐implant soft and hard tissue dimensions.     

The effect of smoking on survival and bone loss of implants with a fluoride-modified surface: a 2-year retrospective analysis of 1106 implants placed in daily practice

Aim: To compare the survival and peri‐implant bone loss of implants with a fluoride‐modified surface in smokers and nonsmokers. Materials and methods: Patient files of all patients referred for implant treatment from November 2004 to 2007 were scrutinized. All implants were placed by the same experienced surgeon (B. C.). The only inclusion criterion was a follow‐up time of at least 2 years. Implant survival and bone loss were assessed by an external calibrated examiner (S. V.) comparing digital peri‐apical radiographs taken during recall visits with the post‐operative ones. Implant success was determined according to the international success criteria ( Albrektsson et al. 1986 ). Survival of implants installed in smokers and nonsmokers was compared using the log‐rank test. Both nonparametric tests and fixed model analysis were adopted to evaluate bone loss in smokers and nonsmokers. Results: One‐thousand one‐hundred and six implants in 300 patients (186 females; 114 males) with a mean follow‐up of 31 months (SD 7.15; range 24–58) were included. Nineteen implants in 17 patients failed, resulting in an overall survival rate of 98.3% at the implant level and 94.6% at the patient level. After a follow‐up period of 2 years, the cumulative survival rates was 96.7% and 99.1% with the patient and implant as the statistical unit, respectively. Implant survival was significantly higher for nonsmokers compared with smokers (implant level P=0.025; patient level P=0.017). The overall mean bone loss was 0.34 mm (n=1076; SD 0.65; range 0–7.1). Smokers lost significantly more bone compared with nonsmokers in the maxilla (0.74 mm; SD 1.07 vs. 0.33 mm; SD 0.65; P<0.001), but not in the mandible (0.25 mm; SD 0.65 vs. 0.22 mm; SD 0.5; P=0.298). Conclusion: The present study is the first to compare peri‐implant bone loss in smokers and nonsmokers from the time of implant insertion (baseline) to at least 2 years of follow‐up. Implants with a fluoride‐modified surface demonstrated a high survival rate and limited bone loss. However, smokers are at a higher risk of experiencing implant failure and more prone to show peri‐implant bone loss in the maxilla. Whether this bone loss is predicting future biological complications remains to be evaluated.     

A randomized clinical 1‐year trial comparing two types of non‐submerged dental implants

Objectives: This study compared the implant stability and clinical outcomes obtained with two types of non‐submerged dental implants that have different thread designs and surface treatments. Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year of follow‐up was performed on 56 participants with 75 implants (control group, 36 implants in 28 subjects; experimental group, 39 implants in 28 subjects). The experimental group received the Osstem SSII Implant system; the control group received the Standard Straumann^® Dental Implant System. The diameter and length of the fixture were uniform at 4.1 mm and 10 mm and all the implants restored the unilateral loss of one or two molars from the mandible. To compare implant stability, the peak insertion torque, implant stability quotient (ISQ), and periotest value (PTV) were evaluated during surgery, and at 4 and 10 weeks after surgery. To compare marginal bone loss, standard periapical radiographs were obtained during surgery, and at 10 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Results: This study showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in peak insertion torque (P=0.009) and ISQ (P=0.003) but not in PTV (P=0.097) at surgery. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in the pattern of change of ISQ during the 10 weeks after surgery (P=0.339). For marginal bone loss, no significant difference was observed between the control and the experimental groups before functional loading (P=0.624), but after 1 year of follow‐up, a borderline difference was observed (P=0.048). Conclusion: The success rate after 1 year of follow‐up was 100% for both implant system despite the presence of a significant difference in implant stability during surgery. There was a borderline difference in marginal bone loss after 1 year of follow‐up. To cite this article:
Park J‐C, Ha S‐R, Kim S‐M, Kim M‐J, Lee J‐B, Lee J‐H. A randomized clinical 1‐year trial comparing two types of non‐submerged dental implant.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 228–236.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01828.x     

Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs

Background: Chemical modification of implant surface is typically associated with surface topographic alterations that may affect early osseointegration. This study investigates the effects of controlled surface alterations in early osseointegration in an animal model. Methods: Five implant surfaces were evaluated: 1) alumina‐blasting, 2) biologic blasting, 3) plasma, 4) microblasted resorbable blasting media (microblasted RBM), and 5) alumina‐blasting/acid‐etched (AB/AE). Surface topography was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and optical interferometry, and chemical assessment by x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The implants were placed in the radius of six dogs, remaining 2 and 4 weeks in vivo. After euthanization, specimens were torqued‐to‐interface failure and non‐decalcified‐processed for histomorphologic bone–implant contact, and bone area fraction–occupied evaluation. Statistical evaluation was performed by one‐way analysis of variance (P <0.05) and post hoc testing by the Tukey test. Results: The alumina‐blasting surface presented the highest average surface roughness and mean root square of the surface values, the biologic blasting the lowest, and AB/AE an intermediate value. The remaining surfaces presented intermediate values between the biologic blasting and AB/AE. The x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra revealed calcium and phosphorus for the biologic blasting and microblasted RBM surfaces, and the highest oxygen levels for the plasma, microblasted RBM, and AB/AE surfaces. Significantly higher torque was observed at 2 weeks for the microblasted RBM surface (P <0.04), but no differences existed between surfaces at 4 weeks (P >0.74). No significant differences in bone–implant contact and bone area fraction–occupied values were observed at 2 and 4 weeks. Conclusion: The five surfaces were osteoconductive and resulted in high degrees of osseointegration and biomechanical fixation.     

A Retrospective Evaluation of the Survival Rates of Splinted and Non‐Splinted Short Dental Implants in Posterior Partially Edentulous Jaws

Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the survival rate and bone loss around short implants (≤10 mm) supporting splinted or non‐splinted posterior prostheses during a follow‐up period of 3 to 16 years. Methods: A total of 453 implants from 198 patients was divided into splinted or non‐splinted groups. Implant survival rate was calculated for each group, and potential risk was represented as odds ratio (OR). The final linear distance from implant platform level to the first bone‐to‐implant contact was compared to this same reference just after loading by digital periapical radiographs to determine the marginal bone loss (BL). Results: The splinted group comprised 219 implants in 86 patients, whereas the non‐splinted group included 234 implants from 112 patients. The mean follow‐up period was 9.7 ± 3.7 years. Although different success rates were found for splinted (97.7%) and non‐splinted (93.2%) groups, they exhibited similar BL (1.22 ± 0.95 mm and 1.27 ± 1.15 mm, respectively). The success of splinted implants was associated with no other variable, whereas non‐splinted implants exhibited higher risk of failure when placed in men (OR = 3.2) and when implants shorter than 10 mm were used (OR = 3.6 and 4.1 for 8.5 mm and 7 mm, respectively). Regardless of group, 71.4% of the unsuccessful implants failed before the end of the first year after loading. Conclusion: Non‐splinted posterior short implants had a somewhat lower success rate than splinted short implants, and the failure rate in non‐splinted short implants appeared to be greater in males as well as in implants ≤10 mm.     

Factors Associated with Failure of Surface‐Modified Implants up to Four Years of Function

Objectives: The relative impact of innovative treatment concepts on the failure of surface‐modified implants is not well understood. This retrospective study aimed to explore this using data obtained in a university postgraduate training center. Material and Methods: Patients treated with implants for a variety of indications over a 3‐year period were included. All implants had been at least 1 year in function. Clinical records were evaluated for implant failure and in reference to implant length/diameter/location, time from tooth loss to implant placement, bone condition (native/grafted), surgical protocol (two‐/one‐stage), loading protocol (delayed/early/immediate), type of prosthesis (removable/fixed), surgeon's experience level (resident/trainee) and specialty (periodontist/oral surgeon). The impact of each covariate on failure was tested using the Fisher's exact test. Kaplan‐Meier survival functions were constructed and Mantel‐Cox log–rank tests were used to compare survival functions. To correct for possible interaction, Cox proportional Hazards regression was adopted. Results: Forty‐one of 1,180 (3.5%) implants were lost in 34/461 (7.4%) patients (245 ♀, 216 ♂; mean age 51, range 18–90). Factors showing significant impact on failure on the basis of univariate analyses were implant location (p = .015), surgical protocol (p = .002), loading protocol (p = .002), surgeon's experience level (p = .035) and specialty (p = .001). When controlling for other covariates, only the loading protocol had a significant influence (p = .049) with early loading more prone to failure (p = .014) when compared with delayed loading. Immediate loading and delayed loading showed comparable implant survival (p = .311). Conclusions: Implant therapy may be highly successful in a training center where inexperienced clinicians are strictly monitored and personally guided. Implant specific variables do not affect implant survival but early loading is a risk indicator for implant failure, whereas immediate loading is not.     

Influence of Implant Neck Surface and Placement Depth on Crestal Bone Changes Around Platform‐Switched Implants: A Clinical and Radiographic Study in Dogs

Background: The aim of this animal study is to analyze bone remodeling around platform‐switching (PS) implants with and without a machined (MACH) collar placed at different levels in relation to the crestal bone in a canine model. Methods: All mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted in five dogs. After 6 months, grit‐blasted acid‐etched (GBAE) PS implants with and without a MACH neck were randomly inserted in each hemimandible, positioning the implant‐abutment interface in either a supracrestal (+1.5 mm), equicrestal, or subcrestal (?1.5 mm) position, and healing abutments were connected. Implant abutments were dis/reconnected at 12, 14, 16, and 18 weeks after implant placement. After 6 months of healing, animals were sacrificed. Clinical parameters and periapical radiographs were registered on the day of implant placement, at 2 months, at every abutment dis/reconnection, and at sacrifice. Crestal bone changes were calculated and defined as the primary outcome variable. Results: When crestal bone changes from implant placement to 6 months were compared between MACH and GBAE groups, no significant differences were encountered except for implants placed in an equicrestal position (P = 0.04). However, multivariable regression analysis revealed no significant differences between MACH and GBAE implants placed in a supracrestal (β = ?0.08; P = 0.45), equicrestal (β = ?0.05; P = 0.50), or subcrestal (β = ?0.13; P = 0.19) position. Conclusion: Surface treatment of the implant neck had no significant influence on crestal bone changes around PS implants with and without a MACH collar.     

Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial: Early Loading of Implants in Maxillary Bone

Purpose: The aim of this study was to show prognostic equivalence between implant loading in the maxilla after 12 weeks versus 4 weeks. Materials and Methods: One hundred four patients, from four centers in this open‐labeled randomized multicenter prospective controlled clinical trial, were assigned to either 12 weeks or 4 weeks of unloaded healing. Two hundred sixty‐nine implants (sand blasted large‐grid, acid etched [SLA] surface, ≥4.1 mm diameter; ≥10 mm length) were inserted and evaluated during an individual 5‐year follow‐up. Primary outcome was implant success after 12 months; prognostic equivalence was characterized by a maximum difference of ±5% in implant failure rates. Results: Implant‐wise 1‐year failure rates were estimated 3.1% (5/163 implants) in the 4 weeks group versus 3.6% (4/112 implants) in the 12 weeks group (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference ?3.2 –+4.2%); implant‐wise evaluation demonstrated statistically significant prognostic equivalence of 4 and 12 weeks loading. Patient‐wise 1‐year failure rates were estimated 6.7% (n = 4 patients) in the 4 weeks group versus 5.1% (n = 2 patients) in the 12 weeks group (95% CI for the difference ?9.6 –+6.5%). All implant failures occurred within the first 3 months of the individual observation period. Prior bone augmentation, underdimensioned drilling, bone quality, implant type, implant length, implant diameter, residual teeth, and fixing of the restoration did not reveal associations with the implant outcome: trial site, posterior jaw region, and splinting were associated with a higher failure rate. Resonance frequency analysis did not serve as a predictor of implant failures at the time of implant insertion. Conclusion: Loading of standard SLA implants in the maxilla 4 weeks versus 12 weeks after insertion resulted in statistically equivalent failure patterns within a 1‐year follow‐up period; nevertheless, the observed patient‐wise failure patterns of the interim analysis requires further understanding of patient‐individual aspects of the early loading concept.     

Immediate Occlusal Loading of NanoTite™ Tapered Implants: A Prospective 1‐Year Clinical and Radiographic Study

Background: During the last decade, high success rates have been reported for implants placed with immediate loading procedures, especially when bone quality and quantity provide good implant stability. In many of these studies, straight‐walled implants with moderately rough surfaces were employed. Tapered implants are becoming increasingly more popular due to standardized drilling protocols and reports of high initial primary stability. Purpose: The aim of the present prospective, single center clinical study was to evaluate surface topographical analysis and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the NanoTite? (BIOMET 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) Tapered Implant when used for immediate loading of fixed prostheses and single‐tooth restorations. Materials and Methods: Forty‐two patients who needed implant treatment and met admission criteria agreed to participate in the study and were consecutively enrolled. Surgical implant placement requirements consisted of a final torque of a least 30 Ncm prior to final seating and an implant stability quotient above 55. A total of 139 NanoTite Tapered implants (112 maxillary and 27 mandibular) were placed by one investigator, and the majority of these implants (n = 77/55%) were placed in posterior regions, and in soft bone (n = 90/65%). A total of 57 prosthetic constructions were evaluated consisting of 20 single‐tooth restorations, 30 fixed partial dentures, and 7 complete, fixed maxillary restorations. Radiographs were taken at baseline and at 12 months of follow‐up. Results: Of the 139 study implants, one implant failure was declared. The overall cumulative survival rate at 1 year is 99.4%. Mean marginal bone resorption is 1.01 mm (SD 0.85) during the first year of function. Conclusion: Although limited to the short follow‐up, immediate loading of NanoTite Tapered implants seems to be a viable option in implant rehabilitation, when insertion torque of at least 30 Ncm is achieved. Further studies are needed to authenticate the finding of this study.     

10‐Year Follow‐Up of Immediately Loaded Implants with TiUnite Porous Anodized Surface

Background: The immediate loading of implants with a porous anodized surface is a well‐described technique. Few data are however available on the long‐term outcomes. Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the 10‐year performance of TiUnite implants supporting fixed prostheses placed with an immediate loading approach in both postextractive and healed sites. Materials and Methods: All patients received a fixed provisional restoration supported by immediately loaded parallel design, self‐tapping implants with a porous anodized TiUnite surface, and an external‐hexagonal connection. Both healed and postextractive cases were included. Success and survival rate for restorations and implants, changes in marginal peri‐implant bone level, probing depth measurements, biological or technical complications, and any other adverse event were recorded at yearly follow‐up up to 10 years after surgery. Results: A total of 210 implants fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were consecutively placed in 59 patients. Forty‐seven (22.38%) implants were lost because of the recalled patient refused to attend the planned 10‐year follow‐up. Five over 210 (2.38%) implants were lost. At the final follow‐up, the accumulated mean marginal bone loss and probing depth were, respectively, 1.93 mm (SD 0.40) and 2.54 mm (SD 0.44) for the implants placed in healed sites (n = 84); 1.98 mm (SD 0.37) and 2.63 mm (SD 0.39) for the implants placed in postextractive sites (n = 74). The restorations examined achieved a cumulative 65.26% success rate and 97.96% survival rate. The implants placed in healed and postextractive sites, respectively, achieved a 98.05% and a 96.52% cumulative survival rate. Conclusions: Positive results in terms of bone maintenance in the long‐term perspective are to be expected using immediately loaded implants with a TiUnite porous anodized surface in both postextractive and healed sites when adequate levels of oral hygiene are kept.     

Mandibular single‐implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised‐control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems

Objectives: To determine surgical and prosthodontic outcomes of mandibular single‐implant overdentures, opposing complete maxillary dentures, using a wide diameter implant and large ball attachment system compared with different regular diameter implants with standard attachment systems. Materials and methods: Thirty‐six edentulous participants (mean age 68 years, SD 9.2) were randomly assigned into three treatment groups (n=12). A single implant was placed in the mandibular midline of participants to support an overdenture using a 6‐week loading protocol. The control group received Southern regular implants and standard ball attachments. One group received Southern 8‐mm‐wide implants and large ball attachments. Another group received Neoss regular implants and Locator attachments. Parametric and non‐parametric tests of a statistical software package (SPSS) were used to determine between groups differences in marginal bone loss, implant stability, implant, and prosthodontic success (P<0.05). Results: Implant success after 1 year was 75% for Southern regular implant (control) group; and 100% for the Southern wide and Neoss regular implant groups (P=0.038). Mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 0.19 mm (SD 0.39) without significant differences observed. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) at baseline was significantly lower for the Southern regular (control) group than the other two groups (P=0.001; P=0.009). At 1 year, no significant difference in implant stability was observed (mean ISQ 74.6, SD 6.1). The change in implant stability from baseline to 1 year was significant for the control group (P=0.025). Prosthodontic success was comparable between the groups but the maintenance (41 events overall, mean 1.2) was greater for the Locator and the standard ball attachments. Conclusions: Mandibular single‐implant overdentures are a successful treatment option for older edentulous adults with early loading protocol using implants of different diameters and with different attachment systems. To cite this article:
Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single‐implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised‐control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 330–337.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02004.x     

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Bone Loss around Titanium Implants with Oxidized Surface: Six‐Year Follow‐Up Results from a Prospective Case Series Study

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess long‐term clinical outcomes and peri‐implant bone level changes around oxidized implants supporting partial fixed rehabilitations. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐two partially edentulous patients were included in the study. A total of 33 fixed rehabilitations were placed, supported by 54 titanium implants with oxidized microtextured surface. Prostheses were delivered after 3 and 6 months of implant placement in the mandible and maxilla, respectively. Patients were scheduled for follow‐up at 6 and 12 months and then yearly. At each follow‐up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and periapical radiographs were taken. The main outcomes were prosthesis success, implant survival, implant success, and marginal bone level change. Results: Three patients were excluded from the study because they did not attend the 1‐year follow‐up. Nineteen patients, accounting for 49 implants, were followed for at least 6 years after prosthesis delivery. The mean follow‐up duration was 81.8 months (range 75–96 months). One mandibular single‐tooth implant failed after 1 year in a smoker woman. Cumulative implant survival and success at 6 years were 98.0% and 95.9%, respectively. Prosthesis success was 96.7%. The mean peri‐implant bone loss at 6 years was 0.76 ± 0.47 mm. Not significantly (p = .75) greater bone loss was found in the maxilla (0.78 ± 0.14 mm, n = 19) as compared with the mandible (0.74 ± 0.59 mm, n = 30). In the maxilla, bone loss was significantly greater around implants supporting partial prostheses as compared with single‐tooth implants (p = .03). Full patient satisfaction was reported. Conclusion: Implants with oxidized microtextured surface may achieve excellent long‐term clinical outcomes in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.     

Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone

Aim: To compare the immediate restoration of single implants in the esthetic zones performed on implants placed immediately after tooth extraction or 8 weeks later (immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration). Methods: Sixteen patients (10 women and 6 men) with a mean age of 35 years (ranging from 21 to 49 years old) were treated from 2004 to 2005 for single‐tooth replacement in the upper arch. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: in the test group patients received implants placed and restored (non‐occlusal loading) at the time of tooth extraction; in the control group implants were placed 8 weeks after tooth extraction and immediately restored. All the patients received tapered effect (TE) implants from the Straumann Dental Implant System. The following parameters were evaluated at the moment of provisional restoration (within 48 h after implant placement) and at the 2 years follow‐up visit: marginal bone resorption, papilla index, position of the mucosal margin. The implant stability quotient was measured at the moment of implant placement and at the moment of the delivery of the definitive restoration. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in any of the studied parameters between the test and the control groups (P>0.05). The implant stability quotient values between the test and control groups were significant (P<0.05) at the moment of implant placement but were no more significant at the loading of the definitive restoration (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that immediate replacement without functional loading may be considered a valuable therapeutic option for selected cases of single‐tooth replacement in the esthetic area when TE implants are used. Implant stability at the moment of implant placement is slightly inferior in the immediate replacement group, but it does not affect the treatment result.     

Microbial Colonization of the Peri‐Implant Sulcus and Implant Connection of Implants Restored With Cemented Versus Screw‐Retained Superstructures: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate peri‐implant and intraconnection microflora of healthy implants restored with cemented and screwed superstructures. Methods: Patients with two to three implants restored with cemented or screwed restorations and 5 years of follow‐up were recruited. Samples were taken from peri‐implant sulci, adjacent teeth, and the inner portion of connections. Prevalence of positive sites and bacterial loads for 10 microorganisms were obtained with quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Implant connection permeability to the studied microorganisms was estimated using a standardized bacterial contamination index. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized estimating equations model, Wald χ² test, and the least significant difference test. Results: The final sample consisted of 18 patients (55 implants) in the cemented group and 22 patients (46 implants) in the screw‐retained group. Regarding prevalence of positive sites, significant differences between groups were only found for Tannerella forsythia, which was 8.7 times more frequent at peri‐implant sulci of cemented than screw‐retained prostheses. Bacterial loads of Porphyromonas gingivalis, T. forsythia, Parvimonas micra, and total bacterial load were significantly higher at peri‐implant sulci for the cemented group; at the inner portion of connections, values were significantly higher for P. micra and Fusobacterium nucleatum for the screw‐retained group. Contamination index values demonstrated higher permeability to most microbes in the cemented group. Conclusions: Internal implant surfaces were microbiologically contaminated for both cemented and screw‐retained superstructures. Differences were found between the two methods of prosthetic retention: the cemented group presented significantly higher bacterial loads in the peri‐implant sulcus but significantly lower bacterial loads at the inner portion of the implant connection.     

Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone

Purpose: The influence of the osteotome technique on the interface reaction of cylinder implants (SLA, ITI^®) was compared with the interface reaction of conventional implant insertion in an animal model. Material and methods: A total of 64 implants were placed in the cranial and caudal tibia of 8 Göttinger minipigs. The implant site was prepared either by a conventional technique with drills (control group A) or by the osteotome technique (experimental group B). Bone tissue responses were evaluated by histomorphometry, fluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy after 7 and 28 days of osseointegration. Results: The average initial (7 days) bone‐to‐implant contact ratio was not statistically significantly different for the osteotome technique (35.88±2.94%) than for the control group (43.78±3.39%, P<0.095). After 28 days, the bone‐to‐implant contact ratio became statistically significantly higher when implants were inserted by conventional preparation (44.81±3.07% (group B), 63.47±4.87% (group A), P=0.003). Whereas fluorescence and immunhistologic examination revealed new bone formation with osteocalcin deposition directly at the implant surface in both groups, the extent of direct bone/implant contact was enhanced in conventionally prepared implant sites. SEM analysis confirmed an intimate bone to implant bond without fibrous tissue formation in places of direct contact at an ultrastructured level. Conclusion: Implant placement in conventionally prepared implantation sites is accompanied by an improved interface formation at an early stage of implantation.     

One‐Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical,Radiographic, and RFA Study

Background: The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available. Purpose: To study the stability and clinical/radiographic outcomes of Neoss implants 1 year of loading when using a two‐stage protocol. Materials and Methods: Ninety (90) consecutive patients scheduled for implant treatment using a two‐stage procedure were enrolled in a prospective follow‐up study. A total of 218 implants (Neoss System, Bimodal surface, Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) in diameters of 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 mm and in lengths from 7 to 15 mm were placed to support 29 single tooth replacements, 53 partial bridges, 5 full bridges, and 10 overdentures in both jaws. Abutment connection was made after a healing period of 3–4 months. The patients were followed during 1 year of loading with clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis (Osstell Mentor?, Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) examinations. Prostheses were removed at the annual check‐up for individual testing of implant stability. Results: Three implant failures were experienced, giving a survival rate of 98.6% after 1 year. A mean bone loss of 0.6 mm (SD 0.8) was observed after 1 year. There was a significant inverse correlation between implant diameter and marginal bone loss (p < .003). The mean implant stability quotient levels were 73.7 (SD 7.6), 74.4 (SD 6.4), and 76.7 (SD 5.2) at placement, abutment connection, and first annual check‐up, respectively. The stability had increased significantly from placement to 1 year (p < .001) and from abutment to 1 year (p < .0001). Implant stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla at all time points. There was a significant correlation between bone quality and stability at placement (p < .0001) and abutment connection (p < .001) but not after 1 year. Conclusions: The use of Neoss implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of consecutive edentate patients with different needs resulted in predictable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year of loading. Implant stability measurements revealed a favorable bone tissue reaction to the implants.     

Histologic evaluation of a human immediately loaded titanium implant with a porous anodized surface

Background: Several researchers have demonstrated, in the past decade, in clinical and histologic studies, that immediate loading can be successfully used in implant dentistry. Many factors are thought to be of importance in obtaining mineralized tissues at the interface. One of these factors is the implant surface characteristics. Recently, an implant with a new porous anodized surface has been introduced in the market. Purpose: The goal of this study was to histologically evaluate a clinically retrieved immediately loaded implant with a porous anodized surface. Materials and Methods: After a 6‐month loading period, an immediately loaded implant with a porous anodized surface that had been inserted in the posterior maxilla was retrieved. Results: Histology showed that mineralized tissue was present at the interface and the bone‐implant contact percentage was about 60%. No gaps or fibrous tissue or inflammatory infiltrate were present at the interface. Conclusions: Results show that immediate loading of dental implants has no untoward effects on the formation of mineralized tissues at the interface. Immediate loading is a possible alternative in implant dentistry.     

Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone

Objective: Recent studies have suggested that magnesium (Mg) ions exert a beneficial effect on implant osseointegration. This study assessed the osseointegration of nanoporous titanium (Ti) surface incorporating the Mg produced by hydrothermal treatment in rabbit cancellous bone to determine whether this surface would further enhance bone healing of moderately rough‐surfaced implants in cancellous bone, and compared the result with commercially available micro‐arc oxidized Mg‐incorporated implants. Material and methods: The Mg‐incorporated Ti surfaces (RBM/Mg) were obtained by hydrothermal treatment using an alkaline Mg‐containing solution on grit‐blasted moderately rough (RBM) implants. Untreated RBM and recently introduced Mg‐incorporated microporous Ti implants produced by micro‐arc oxidation (M) were used controls in this study. The surface characteristics were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and optical profilometry. Twenty‐four threaded implants with a length of 10 mm (eight RBM implants, eight RBM/Mg implants and eight M implants) were placed in the femoral condyles of 12 New Zealand White rabbits. Histomorphometric analysis was performed 4 weeks after implantation. Results: Hydrothermally treated and untreated grit‐blasted implants displayed almost identical surface morphologies and R_a values at the micron‐scale. The RBM/Mg implants exhibited morphological differences compared with the RBM implants at the nano‐scale, which displayed nanoporous surface structures. The Mg‐incorporated implants (RBM/Mg and M) exhibited more continuous bone apposition and a higher degree of bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) than the untreated RBM implants in rabbit cancellous bone. The RBM/Mg implants displayed significantly greater BIC% than untreated RBM implants, both in terms of the all threads region and the total lateral length of implants (P<0.05), but no statistical differences were found between the RBM/Mg and M implants except BIC% values in total lateral length. Conclusion: These results indicate that a nanoporous Mg‐incorporated surface may be effective in enhancing the osseointegration of moderately rough grit‐blasted implants by increasing the degree of bone?implant contact in areas of cancellous bone. To cite this article :
Park J‐W, An C‐H, Jeong S‐H, Suh J‐Y. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 294–300.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02144.x