Drug Insight: oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men. At present, first-line oral pharmacotherapy for most patients with ED is a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor, of which three are currently available worldwide. Sildenafil (Viagra, Pfizer) has a very satisfactory efficacy-safety profile in all patient categories. The first PDE-5 inhibitor to reach the market, it is now the most widely prescribed oral agent for ED. Tadalafil (Cialis, Lilly ICOS) and vardenafil (Levitra, Bayer/GlaxoSmithKline) were introduced to the European Union and the US in 2003 and 2004, respectively. These three PDE-5 inhibitors share many characteristics, but each has unique features. This review describes the chemical, pharmacologic and clinical features of sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil as oral first-line treatments for ED. First, we describe the physiology of penile erection and PDE-5 inhibitor pharmacology, including chemistry, PDE selectivity, pharmacokinetics, and possible drug interactions. We then summarize data on the efficacy and safety profiles of the three PDE-5 inhibitors for the treatment of ED in the general population, in patients with diabetes mellitus and in men that have undergone bilateral nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy.     

同期内使用3种PDE5抑制剂治疗ED的经验

目的:观察与比较同期内使用3种PDE5抑制剂治疗ED患者的疗效,满意情况和不良反应。分析影响患者疗效、接受度、倾向性的因素。方法:11个月在门诊应用3种PDE5抑制剂治疗ED患者331例。使用西地那非134例,他达拉非88例,及伐地那非109例。医师详细指导药物的应用,注意事项,观察的内容等,并互留电话,列表登记、随访。结果:复诊或电话随访时间,结果为:①获得良好的疗效及满意率为西地那非72例(79.12%),他达拉非52例(78.78%),伐地那非63例(81.81%)。②PDE5抑制剂单纯或交叉应用的资料分析显示:青年患者或新婚者,偏好伐地那非;③中青年患者倾向于他达拉非;中老年及较长期应用PDE5抑制剂的患者多选用西地那非。3种PDE5抑制剂用于早泄均有一定疗效。④对不能继续用此类药治疗ED的原因进行了分析,分别为:价高,不治本,效果差,耽心不良反应。结论:①同期3种PDE5抑制剂治疗ED的疗效基本相近。亦各有一些优势和特点。②3种PDE5抑制剂的安全性均好,一般、轻度不良反应相近,中度、特殊的不良反应少,严重不良反应均无发生。③PDE5抑制剂的疗效观察,目前众多的问卷、量表实际均仍以主观的感受为主。对同一个人以相同形式、相同问题、繁简一致阐述,获得的有关疗效满意情况、感受等简易回答是有可比性、可信度和实用性的。     

磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂治疗勃起功能障碍的疗效和安全性比较

磷酸二酯酶 5 (PDE 5 )抑制剂西地那非的问世使男性勃起功能障碍 (ED)的治疗手段发生了根本性的改变。1998年以来有 10 0多个国家的 2 0 0 0多万患者使用了西地那非 ,患者的死亡率与总体人群的死亡率差异无显著性。西地那非治疗ED平均有效率达 80 %以上 ,成为治疗ED的首选手段。随着新的PDE 5抑制剂伐地那非和泰地那非在国外先后进入临床使用 ,药物治疗ED有了更多的选择。本文通过比较 3种PDE 5抑制剂的药效学、药动学及不良反应以评价其疗效和安全性。     

Prevalence and medical management of erectile dysfunction in Asia

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is an important worldwide health issue that has a significant negative impact on the quality of life and life satisfaction of both the affected individual and his partner. Here we review the prevalence of ED in Asia, associated factors that may influence sexual attitudes and sexual behaviours, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PDE-5 inhibitors in Asian men. We searched for English-language articles in MEDLINE and PubMed from January 2000 to September 2010. Our results showed that the overall reported prevalence rate of ED in Asia ranged widely, from 2% to 88%. This finding indicates that ED is a common and major health problem in this region. However, sociocultural and economic factors in Asia prevent people from seeking and obtaining appropriate medical care. We found reports on five kinds of PDE-5 inhibitors for the management of ED: sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil, udenafil and mirodenafil. The results of RCTs showed that these five PDE-5 inhibitors are more effective than placebo in improving erectile function in Asian men with ED and that these drugs have similar efficacy and safety profiles.     

The effects of chronic phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use on different organ systems

Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors selectively inhibit PDE-5 enzymes that are present in various tissues like penile tissue, platelets, vascular, and smooth muscle tissue. The drug's actions on these tissues have lead to the successful therapeutic use in patients suffering from conditions such as erectile dysfunction (ED) and pulmonary hypertension. PDE-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) act on the erectile tissue causing penile smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilatation leading to penile erection. In addition, in particular when used in conjunction with prostaglandin inhibitors, PDE-5i cause vasodilatation in pulmonary vasculature hence decreasing both the pulmonary arterial pressure and resistance. PDE-5i have also shown to mildly decrease blood pressure, increase cardiac index, and increase coronary blood flow in experimental animals as well as in human studies. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved three PDE-5i for the treatment of ED: sildenafil (Viagra), vardenafil (Levitra), and tadalafil (Cialis) and one for pulmonary hypertension: sildenafil (Revatio). These agents are highly selective for PDE-5 enzymes as compared to other subclasses of PDE enzymes and have the almost identical pharmacological action but slightly different pharmacokinetics. Only little data exist about long-term use of PDE-5i and their effects on different organ system. This paper reviews the current information available on chronic PDE-5 inhibitor use.     

Vardenafil: A new approach to the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Vardenafil is a phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor developed as an oral therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). Multiple phase 3 clinical trials have been completed and vardenafil is expected to launch worldwide in 2003. Two pivotal, randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies have evaluated the use of vardenafil in men with ED. Vardenafil improved the rate of achieving and maintaining an erection during sexual intercourse. Improvement also was noted in other aspects of sexual function, including confidence, orgasmic function, and overall satisfaction. Vardenafil produces clinically and statistically significant improvements in erectile function regardless of age, baseline severity, and etiology and is efficacious for the treatment of ED in diabetic and postprostatectomy patients. Vardenafil has a rapid onset of action and completion of successful sexual intercourse is possible for some patients 16 minutes after its administration. Twenty milligrams of vardenafil has sustained long-term efficacy by providing up to 92% of patients with improved erections during more than 2 years of treatment. Vardenafil is well tolerated, with an adverse event profile typical of the class of PDE-5 inhibitors. The most common adverse events were headache, flushing, rhinitis, and dyspepsia, which were mild or moderate and generally decreased with continued treatment. Vardenafil may be associated with transient reductions in blood pressure and commensurate increases in heart rate, with the overall incidence of cardiovascular-related adverse events similar to that of placebo.     

Effects of sildenafil and vardenafil treatments on sleep quality and depression in hemodialysis patients with erectile dysfunction

ED is prevalent in hemodialysis (HD) patients, and closely related to poor sleep and depression. Efficacy of treating ED either with sildenafil or vardenafil has been shown to be beneficial in ameliorating concomitant depression in non-HD patients. It is yet to be shown whether treatment of ED with a PDE-5 inhibitor would improve poor sleep in HD patients. We aimed to compare the effects of sildenafil and vardenafil on sleep quality and depression in HD patients with ED. A total of 32 maintenance HD patients with ED randomized into two groups to receive either sildenafil or vardenafil for 4 weeks. After a 2-week washout and a crossover, each group received the other drug for another 4-week period. Sleep quality and depression were evaluated via post-sleep inventory (PSI) and Beck's depression inventory (BDI), respectively, at baseline and at the end of the treatment. Sildenafil and vardenafil both improved PSI and BDI scores significantly compared with pretreatment values. However, there was no difference between sildenafil and vardenafil with respect to these parameters. PDE-5 inhibitors, sildenafil and vardenafil, caused a significant improvement in sleep quality and depression in this cohort of HD patients with ED.     

PDE-5 inhibitors: current status and future trends

Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors are a well-established, first-line therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). Extensive clinical trials and clinical experience established the highly significant efficacy and the safety of this class of drugs in the treatment of ED.Furthermore, the efficacy of PDE-5 inhibitors has been established in men with ED with a broad range of etiologies and comorbidities. The future of PDE-5 inhibitors includes the expansion of indications such as the treatment of pulmonary hypertension and the potential of treatment of symptomatic BPH.     

Use of combined intracorporal injection and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy for men with a suboptimal response to sildenafil and/or vardenafil monotherapy after radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To report experience with combined therapy using intracorporal injection (ICI) of alprostadil and oral phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for the minimally invasive treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) after radical prostatectomy (RP), as PDE-5 inhibitors are effective but a few patients may have a suboptimal response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 34 men (aged 46-66 years) had a nerve-sparing retropubic RP and subsequent ED. Patients were titrated on sildenafil citrate or vardenafil to maximum doses. All had a suboptimal response after a maximum of eight doses of oral therapy and were then treated with ICI therapy using 15 or 20 microg alprostadil. Erectile function was assessed with the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM). RESULTS: Of the 32 patients who continued combined therapy, 22 (68%) had an improvement in erectile function after ICI therapy, as assessed by the SHIM score. On follow-up, 36% of these patients used ICI therapy only intermittently, instead of regularly, as they felt that this was adequate enough for good results. CONCLUSIONS: PDE-5 oral pharmacotherapy is the most commonly used effective therapy for ED but may not be as effective in patients who have radical surgery; the addition of testosterone patches may have side-effects or be considered a risk in patients with a history of prostate cancer. The use of ICI therapy as an adjunct or maintenance therapy to their oral medication may be another alternative in these patients.     

Does the clinical efficacy of vardenafil correlate with its effect on the endothelial function of cavernosal arteries? A pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the results of the ultrasonographic (US) measurement of post-occlusive changes in the diameters of cavernosal arteries after administering phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor vardenafil could be associated with the response to vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED), as currently there are no reliable methods for predicting the success rate of oral PDE-5 inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 122 men with ED; after a complex evaluation, the endothelial function of the cavernosal arteries was assessed in all patients before and 1 h after oral ingestion of vardenafil (20 mg), using our modification of the US assessment of post-occlusive changes in the diameter of cavernosal arteries. After the evaluation, all patients received vardenafil 20 mg on demand for 4 weeks. A successful response was defined using two endpoints, i.e. the normalization of the International Index of Erectile Function Erectile Function domain score (> or = 26) and positive answers to both Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 on > or = 75% of occasions, based on the diary data collected. RESULTS: In all patients the mean (sd) initial percentage increase in the cavernosal artery diameter (PICAD) in responders and nonresponders was not statistically different, at 49 (24) and 43 (26), respectively (P = 0.168), but PICAD values after vardenafil were significantly greater in responders, at 73 (16) vs 55 (23) (P < 0.001). Analysis of data from patients with different causes of ED showed statistically significant differences in PICAD between responders and nonresponders only in those with arteriogenic ED. The sensitivity and specificity of a PICAD of > or = 50% after taking vardenafil 20 mg for predicting a positive response to the same dose of the drug in patients with arteriogenic ED were 94.9% and 91.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the US assessment of post-occlusive changes in the diameter of cavernosal arteries after vardenafil administration are significantly associated with the clinical efficacy of the drug in patients with arteriogenic ED.     

Molecular mechanisms and pharmacokinetics of phosphodiesterase-5 antagonists

The prominence of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction and other diseases related to vascular dysfunction mandates a comprehensive understanding of the properties and effects of these compounds. Three potent and selective PDE-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) have been approved for clinical use. The clinical efficacy and safety profiles of these medications are related to their molecular mode of action, the selectivity for PDE-5, and the pharmacokinetic properties (absorption, bioavailability, time to onset of action, distribution, metabolism, and elimination). These PDE-5 inhibitors share some common properties with regard to mechanisms of action and selectivities for PDE-5. They also have distinctive characteristics that may impact their clinical use. This article focuses on the basic biochemistry of cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling and the pharmacokinetic parameters that describe characteristics of drug action of these PDE-5 inhibitors in facilitating smooth muscle relaxation, leading to improved penile erectile response or causing side effects.     

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus

Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, has become a first-line therapy for diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). The efficacy in this subgroup, based on the Global Efficacy Question, is 56% vs 84% in a selected group of non-diabetic men with ED. Two novel PDE5 inhibitors, tadalafil (Lilly ICOS) and vardenafil (Bayer), have recently completed efficacy and safety clinical trials in 'general' and diabetic study populations and are now candidates for US FDA approval. A summary analysis of the phase three clinical trials of sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil in both study populations is presented to provide a foundation on which the evaluation of the role of the individual PDE5 inhibitors for the treatment of patients with ED and DM can be built.     

Alpha-adrenoceptors are a common denominator in the pathophysiology of erectile function and BPH/LUTS--implications for clinical practice

A literature search of PubMed documented publications and abstracts from proceedings of scientific meetings was made to review the available data on benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) with a special focus on the role of alpha-adrenoceptors as critical mediators of pathophysiology. The reader is introduced to clinical results on the therapeutic potential of alpha-blockers alone and in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors in the treatment of ED associated with LUTS/BPH. Epidemiological studies clearly show that an association exists between ED and LUTS/BPH. The severity of LUTS is correlated with the risk for ED. A significant number of LUTS/BPH patients are nonresponsive to the common ED treatment with PDE-5 inhibitors. As smooth muscle contractility is regulated by adrenoceptors in the corpus cavernosum, prostate and detrusor, the alpha-adrenoceptor system may be considered a common pathophysiological mediator in the development of ED and LUTS/BPH. Blockade of alpha-adrenoceptors for the treatment of BPH/LUTS may have the potential of improving sexual function. Conversely, PDE-5 inhibitors may exhibit positive effects in LUTS patients. Pilot studies on combination regimens of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists and PDE-5 inhibitors have yielded encouraging results in LUTS patients with persistent ED. On the basis of pharmacological and clinical evidence, it is established that the alpha-adrenoceptor system plays an important role in the pathophysiology of ED and LUTS secondary to BPH. Larger trials on the combination of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists with PDE-5 inhibitors are necessary to develop an integrated treatment approach for BPH/LUTS patients with comorbid ED.     

Testosterone and erectile dysfunction

Aging is associated with a decline in several important health factors in men, including libido. Serum testosterone concentrations also decrease with age, and many age-related clinical features are closely associated with androgen deficiency, including erectile function (ED). Approximately 70% of ED is of organic origin, with the major risk factors being diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking and chronic medical illnesses. These are also established risk factors for atherosclerosis, which is the predominant predisposing factor of vasculogenic ED. The introduction of phosphodiasterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for the treatment of ED made a significant impact both in terms of clinical efficacy, and increasing the awareness of the condition. In spite of this, some patients fail to respond to PDE-5 inhibitors alone. Both animal and clinical studies indicate that testosterone therapy improves both erectile function and the response to PDE-5 inhibitors in patients with ED and hypogonadism. Indeed, interventional studies demonstrate that testosterone replacement therapy improves erectile function in hypogonadal men who have previously failed to respond to PDE-5 inhibitors alone. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the full therapeutic potential of PDE5 inhibitors will only become manifest in a eugonadal state. Recent studies have demonstrated a close relationship between testosterone and ED and suggest that testosterone therapy may be a valuable option for an increasing number of affected men. European guidelines recommend that all men presenting with ED should have their testosterone concentrations measured.     

Sexual functions of men with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and hypogonadism may improve upon testosterone administration: a pilot study

This study examined 72 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), confirmed by polysomnography. Thirty-two patients were suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) assessed by IIEF-5 questionnaires and confirmed by nocturnal penile tumescence examination. Their testosterone levels were measured. Eight patients had normal testosterone levels and were treated with a PDE-5 inhibitor (vardenafil) only; after 6 months of treatment, 6 of these patients (75%) showed significant improvement in erectile function. The remaining 24 patients with OSAS, ED and hypogonadism (total testosterone <12 nmol l⁻¹), were divided into two groups based on the indication for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy: five patients received CPAP therapy (group 1) and 19 patients did not (group 2). The patients of group 2 received only a PDE-5 inhibitor (vardenafil 20 mg) for ED; and eight patients (42%) showed an improvement after 3 months of treatment. The five patients receiving CPAP therapy were treated with a combination of parenteral testosterone undecanoate and a PDE-5 inhibitor (vardenafil) and all had normal erectile function after 3 months of therapy. The results suggest positive effects of addition of testosterone to treatment with PDE-5 inhibitors in hypogonadal men with OSAS, which should be confirmed in larger controlled studies.     

Sildenafil: A 4-year update in the treatment of 20 million erectile dysfunction patients

Sildenafil citrate, the first internationally approved and widely used oral agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), has revolutionized the treatment of ED throughout the past 5 years. This phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor is selective for corpus cavernosum smooth muscle tissue and produces excellent erectile function. Its efficacy and safety over a wide variety of etiologies of ED and severities of ED demonstrates its usefulness in the clinical treatment of these patients. More than 20 million men have been treated worldwide with sildenafil with excellent results. ED caused by difficult-to-treat etiologies such as radical prostatectomy, severe diabetes, and spinal cord injury have demonstrated efficacy. Although sildenafil citrate, like all PDE-5 inhibitors, is contraindicated in patients taking nitrate medications for cardiac disease, it is effective and safe for those cardiovascular patients who are not taking nitrate medications. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in patients taking sildenafil does not differ from those of the general population. Investigations into the pharmacologic effect of sildenafil on coronary myocardial tissue further supports the safety of this medication. Sildenafil has been safe and effective in patients taking various medications including multiple antihypertensive drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cardiac, and diabetic medications.     

Transient global amnesia after intake of tadalafil, a PDE-5 inhibitor: a possible association?

Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) are well established as an oral treatment for the majority of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). PDE-5 is found in high concentration in smooth muscle cells of the corpora cavernosa. However, enzymes of the PDE family are also expressed in various other tissues, including the brain. Little is known about its effects on the central nervous system (CNS), although it has been suggested that PDE-5 inhibitors might cross the blood-brain barrier. Side effects, such as headache, nasal congestion, flushing, nausea, are much more common. We describe a patient who had a transient global amnesia (TGA) after his first-ever use of tadalafil, a potent PDE-5 inhibitor. Despite the fact that the aetiology of TGA has not entirely been clarified at present, we consider the hypothesis of a causal relationship as tempting with respect to the current hypotheses of TGA pathophysiology. This case, together with others, suggests that PDE-5 inhibitors might be capable of exerting adverse effects in the CNS. Physicians should be aware of the possibility of neurological disturbances when prescribing PDE-5 inhibitors for ED.     

Pre-clinical evidence for the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil, all phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors used for treating erectile dysfunction, for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mRNA expression of the PDE-5 was determined in rat LUT tissues. The PDE-5 inhibitors were also tested in organ-bath experiments and in a partial bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) rat model in vivo. RESULTS: The highest PDE-5 mRNA expression was in the bladder, followed by the urethra and prostate. PDE-5 inhibitors dose-dependently reduced the contraction of the isolated bladder, urethral and prostate strips. The rank order of potency was vardenafil > sildenafil > tadalafil. In human prostate stromal cells vardenafil inhibited cell proliferation and was more effective than tadalafil and sildenafil. In the BOO model, there was a reduction in the non-voiding contractions after bolus intravenous administration of 3 mg/kg sildenafil and vardenafil. CONCLUSION: These results show that PDE-5 is expressed in LUT tissues. PDE-5 inhibitors induced significant relaxation of these tissues, inhibited the proliferation of human prostate stromal cells and reduced the irritative symptoms of BPH/LUTS in vivo. Therefore, PDE-5 inhibitors could be used as an effective treatment for BPH/LUTS.     

Efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil in Asian men with erectile dysfunction

Aim： To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil, a phosphodiesterase type-5 （PDE-5） inhibitor, in men of Asian ethnicity with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Methods： In this prospective, double-blind, multinational study, Asian men were randomized to receive vardenafil （10 mg） or placebo （4：1 ratio） for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain （IIEF-EF）, and Sexual Encounter Profile （SEP） questions related to penetration and intercourse completion. Significant mean improvements were required in all three measures to show positive benefits of vardenafil treatment. Secondary efficacy variables included the Global Assessment Question （GAQ） on erection improvement. Results： Least-squares mean baseline IIEF-EF domain scores （vardenafil 14.6, placebo 13.4） were consistent with moderate ED. After 12 weeks, vardenafil treatment was associated with significant increases from the baseline in IIEF-EF domain scores compared with the placebo （22.4 vs. 14.3; P 〈 0.001）. Vardenafil was associated with significant improvements from baseline in least squares （LS） mean success rates for SEP-2 （vardenafil 82.2 vs. placebo 43.6; P 〈 0.001） and SEP-3 （vardenafil 66.1 vs. placebo 24.0; P 〈 0.001）. Positive GAQ responses were reported by 81.8% of vardenafil recipients vs. 24.3% of placebo recipients. Adverse events were reported by 25.4% of the vardenafil group, the majority mild and transient. Conclusion： Vardenafil （10 mg） is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for moderate ED in Asian men. These results add to the increasing amount of data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of vardenafil for the treatment of ED in a range of patient populations.