Evaluation of postoperative pain relief after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for spontaneous pneumothorax

BACKGROUND: We have investigated correlation between postoperative pain and chest tube insertion after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, and have evaluated preemptive analgesia by intercostal nerve block (ICB) using bupivacaine. METHODS: Thirty patients received VATS for spontaneous hemi-pneumothorax. There were two groups of the patients; Group CT received chest tube before the operation, and the Group NCT received no chest tube. Both groups received general anesthesia combined with ICB by 0.25% bupivacaine at the surgical region before operation. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS scale: 0-10) and the need for additional supplemental analgesics before the operation, and at 6 and 24 hours after the operation, and at 3, 7, 14, and 30 days after the operation. RESULTS: Visual analogue scale in Group NCT before the operation, and at 24 hours, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days after the operation was significantly lower than that of Group CT. Analgesic requirements were significantly lower in the Group NCT than in the Group CT. CONCLUSIONS: We should avoid the insertion of a chest tube before the operation as much as possible. Furthermore early operation and intercostal nerve blockade before the operation were useful to prevent postoperative pain and its shift to chronic post thoracostomy pain.     

Epidural anesthesia during upper abdominal surgery provides better postoperative analgesia

Since repeated noxious stimuli may sensitize neuropathic pain receptors of the spinal cord, we tested the hypothesis that the appropriate blockade of surgical stimuli with epidural anesthesia during upper abdominal surgery would be beneficial for postoperative analgesia. Thirty-six adult patients undergoing either elective gastrectomy or open cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either inhalational general anesthesia alone (group G) or epidural anesthesia along with light general anesthesia (group E) throughout the surgery. Postoperative pain management consisted of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with bupivacaine accompanied by the continuous infusion of buprenorphine. To assess postoperative pain, a visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed at 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. While there was no significant difference in the bupivacaine dose, more patients undergoing gastrectomy in group G required supplemental analgesics than those in group E, and the VAS scores in group E demonstrated significantly better postoperative analgesia compared to group G after both types of surgery. Thus, an appropriate epidural blockade during upper abdominal surgery likely provides better postoperative pain relief.     

Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the effect and timing of incisional and intraperitoneal bupivacaine

PURPOSE: To examine the combined preemptive effects of somatovisceral blockade during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven patients under general anesthesia receiving local infiltration and/or topical peritoneal local anesthesia were studied. Patients were randomized to receive a total of 150 mg (0.25% 60 mL) bupivacaine via periportal (20 mL) and intraperitoneal (40 mL with 1:200,000 epinephrine) administration of each. Group A received preoperative periportal bupivacaine before incision and intraperitoneal bupivacaine immediately after the pneumoperitoneum. Group B received periportal and intraperitoneal bupivacaine at the end of the operation. Group C (preoperative) and Group D (postoperative) received only periportal bupivacaine and Group E (preoperative) and Group F (post-operative) received only intraperitoneal bupivacaine. The control group received no treatment. Pain and nausea were recorded at one, two, three, six, nine, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: Throughout the postoperative 48 hr, incisional somatic pain dominated over other pain localizations in the control group (P <0.05). The incisional pain of groups A, B, C and D was significantly lower than that of the control group in the first and second hours. The incisional pain of groups A and C was significantly lower than that of the control group in the first three hours. CONCLUSION: Incisional pain dominated during the first two post-operative days after LC. Preoperative somato-visceral or somatic local anesthesia reduced incisional pain during the first three post-operative hours. A combination of somato-visceral local anesthetic treatment did not reduce intraabdominal pain, shoulder pain or nausea more than somatic treatment alone. Preoperative incisional infiltration of local anesthetics is recommended.     

布比卡因阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后超前镇痛的比较研究

目的探讨躯体-内脏神经阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后超前镇痛效果. 方法病人随机分为4组,每组25例,A组(躯体阻滞组)在切皮前以0.25%布比卡因25 ml(含1∶200 000肾上腺素)进行切口周围浸润;B组(内脏阻滞组)在气腹后立即以0.25%布比卡因35 ml腹腔内喷洒;C组(躯体-内脏联合阻滞组)进行A组和B组综合处理;D组(对照组)不予处理.在术后1、2、3、6、12、24、48 h分别评估疼痛强度、部位和恶心情况. 结果术后12 h内,D组切口痛明显强于其它部位疼痛(P<0.05).A、C组在术后6 h内疼痛强度和镇痛药物需求量比B、D组明显减少(P<0.05). 结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛以切口痛为主,术前躯体-内脏神经阻滞处理能明显减轻术后早期切口痛,但对腹内痛、肩部痛的镇痛效果并不比单用躯体阻滞更好.术前布比卡因切口躯体神经阻滞值得推荐.     

Postoperative analgesia following spondylodesis using a peridural catheter placed during surgery. Results of a pilot study

For the treatment of postoperative (p.o.) pain following vertebral surgery, systemic analgesics are frequently used in high doses with a variety of side effects. It was the aim of this study to investigate p.o. epidural catheter analgesia in 20 patients following surgical correction of scoliosis using the Cotrel and Dubousset technique. METHODS. The patients received balanced general anesthesia with fentanyl and isoflurane. At the end of the operation, before closing the fascia, an epidural catheter was placed by the orthopedic surgeon. After extubation and following evaluation of the motor function of all extremities. 6-10 ml bupivacaine 0.25% was injected into the epidural catheter followed by continuous administration of 0.25% bupivacaine 4-8 ml/h. Analgesic level and hemodynamic parameters were monitored. Pain was measured by the visual analogue scale. If analgesia was not sufficient, the patients received tramadol or piritramide intravenously. RESULTS. In 11 of 20 patients epidural analgesia was rated adequate; 5 needed additional systemic analgesics, and in 4 effective analgesia was not achieved with either epidural analgesia or systemic opioids. No complications were observed. DISCUSSION. The pilot study documented that epidural analgesia using an intraoperatively placed epidural catheter can be used for p.o. pain relief after vertebral surgery using the Cotrel and Dubousset technique. Additional studies will compare the method described to other pain-relieving procedures.     

Pre-incisional administration of ketamine reduced the postoperative pain

This study was designed to examine the postoperative analgesic effect of pre-/post-incisional administration of ketamine. Thirty-nine female patients scheduled for transabdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Patients in group-K1 (n = 13) received intravenous ketamine 100 mg before surgical incision and patients in group-K2 (n = 13) received the same after laparotomy. Group-C (n = 13) did not receive any ketamine. All patients were anesthetized with combined spinal/epidural anesthesia supplemented with sevoflurane 0.5% and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Postoperative pain was controlled by epidural infusion of the mixture of fentanyl (25 mcg.ml-1) and bupivacaine (3.8 mg.ml-1) at 2.1 ml.hr-1. Analgesic effect was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). VAS and VRS in group-K1 were significantly lower compared with those in group-C, while there was no difference between group-K2 and C. The incidence of side effects and additional use of analgesics were similar among the three groups. In conclusion, pre-incisional administration of ketamine reduced the postoperative pain, but post-incisional ketamine was not effective.     

Effect of lumbar epidural anaesthesia on plasma Cortisol levels in children

The cortisol response to surgery was studied in two groups of children one to eight years old during the first 24 hours after lower abdominal or peripheral surgery. The children were randomly allocated to a control (C) group (n = 6) or an epidural (E) group (n = 7). In Group C, surgery was performed under general anaesthesia and postoperative pain relief was achieved by using non-narcotic analgesics only. In Group E, lumbar epidural anaesthesia was combined with light general anaesthesia and postoperative pain relief was achieved by intermittent doses of bupivacaine administered through an epidural catheter. Cortisol levels were assessed before surgery (C), at the end of surgery (H0), at the 3rd, 6th, 12th and 24th postoperative hours (H3, H6, H12, H24). In Group C, cortisol levels increased significantly at H0, H3 and H6, whereas in Group E, a significant decrease was observed at H0 and a significant increase at H12. Mean cortisol values at H0 and H24 were significantly lower in Group E, when compared with those measured in Group C. In Group E, all postoperative cortisol values remained within the normal range, despite the low level of sensory blockade achieved. This suggests that minimal doses of epidural bupivacaine are effective in decreasing the endocrine stress response to surgery in children. This could be of clinical relevance in high-risk children with poor nutritional status. In Group C, the cortisol response remained altered for a longer period of time.     

术前使用罗哌卡因对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛效应的临床研究

目的:观察腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)术前应用罗哌卡因切口浸润结合术中腹腔喷洒对术后疼痛的缓解效应。方法:随机将择期行LC的90例患者分为3组(n=30),A组术前用0.75%罗哌卡因13.3 ml(100 mg)逐层浸润切口并喷洒腹腔;B组术后使用静脉镇痛泵;C组为对照组,使用生理盐水,方法同A组。分别于麻醉苏醒后2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h记录镇痛模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),并记录3组患者使用镇痛药情况。结果:3组患者术后均无并发症发生及相应毒副反应。术后2 h、6 h、12 h,A、B两组患者VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),均明显低于C组(P<0.05)。A、B两组各有2例(6.7%)患者应用非甾体类抗炎药,C组11例(36.7%)应用非甾体类抗炎药,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:术前罗哌卡因切口浸润结合腹腔内喷洒可明显降低LC术后早期VAS评分,具有良好的镇痛效果,可减少其他镇痛药物的使用量。     

Chemonucleolysis. Peridural anesthesia versus general anesthesia

A prospective comparative study was carried out between two anesthetic techniques for chemonucleolysis. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 50 patients each. Group A were submitted to general anesthesia and group B to epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine, 2% mepivacaine and buprenorphine. Group B was divided into 2 subgroups: in B1, buprenorphine was administered with the local anesthetics, while in B2 buprenorphine was administered postoperatively when pain appeared. Postoperative pain and side effects like anaphylaxis were evaluated. No anaphylactic reactions occurred. Severe lumbar pain appeared in 22% of patients in group A in spite of systematic analgesics, while group B lumbalgia was not severe in any case. Patients in subgroup B1 did not have pain during the 24 first hours and 47.8% of patients in subgroup B2 needed in most of the cases only a dose of buprenorphine. We conclude that epidural anesthesia is a good technique in chemonucleolysis and that the association bupivacaine, mepivacaine and buprenorphine provides a good postoperative pain relief.     

Wound infiltration with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for pain after inguinal herniotomy

In a double-blind, randomized study, 32 patients scheduled for elective inguinal herniotomy under general anaesthesia received subcutaneous infiltration with 40 ml ropivacaine 2.5 mg/ml or bupivacaine. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed repeatedly for 24 hours at rest, during cough and movement on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and by means of pressure algometry. No differences between pain intensities or wound tenderness were found between the groups. The demand for analgesics was similar in the two groups. We conclude that incisional ropivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine in the management of post-herniotomy pain.     

Preoperative infiltration of the surgical area enhances postoperative analgesia of a combined low–dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine regimen after upper abdominal surgery

In a randomized, blinded trial we assessed the value of adding preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with bupivacaine to a low dose epidural regimen for postoperative pain treatment. Forty–nine patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery during combined thoracic epidural (bupivacaine + morphine) and general anaesthesia were studied. Postoperative analgesia was epidural bupivacaine 10 mg hr^-1 + morphine 0.2 mg hr^-1 for 72 h. The patients randomly received preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with bupivacaine 0.25%, 40 ml (group I); or no infiltration (group II). Pain was evaluated at rest, during cough and during mobilization six and eight h after start of surgery, and at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. on the following days until 72 h after start of surgery. The sensory level of analgesia was evaluated by pin prick. We found no difference between the two groups during rest and cough. However, during mobilization group I had lower pain scores compared to group II ( P < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the need for supplemental intramuscular morphine in the treatment group compared to the control group ( P <0.05). Thus an enhanced analgesic effect was demonstrated by adding preoperative infiltration of the surgical area with local anaesthetic to a low dose epidural bupivacaine/morphine regimen after upper abdominal surgery.     

Post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: effects of intraperitoneal local anesthetics on pain control--a randomized prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled trial

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is generally less than open cholecystectomy; however, the postoperative shoulder and abdominal pain experienced by patients still causes preventable distress. Intraperitoneal irrigation of the diaphragmatic surface and gallbladder fossa using normal saline, bupivacaine, or lignocaine may effectively control visceral abdominal pain after an LC. Two hundred patients with similar demographics undergoing elective LC were randomized to one of four groups of 50 patients each, including Group A placebo control, Group B with isotonic saline irrigation, Group C with bupivacaine irrigation, and Group D with lignocaine irrigation. All patients received preperitoneal abdominal wall infiltration with 0.25 per cent bupivacaine to control parietal (somatic) abdominal pain. The visual analogue and verbal rating pain scores at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours for both shoulder and abdominal pain were recorded in a prospective double-blind fashion at four points during the first 24 postoperative hours. Analgesia requirements, vital signs, blood glucose, and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Patients in each group demonstrated a significant difference in visual analogue and verbal rating pain scores and analgesic consumption when compared with controls. Lignocaine controlled pain significantly better than saline or bupivacaine. Bowel function recovery was similar in all patients, and there were no significant complications. We conclude that intraperitoneal irrigation with either saline, bupivacaine, or lignocaine can significantly reduce visceral abdominal pain after LC. Lignocaine was the most efficacious local anesthetic in this trial and has a high safety profile when used at recommended doses.     

Postoperative analgesia after peripheral nerve block for podiatric surgery: clinical efficacy and chemical stability of lidocaine alone versus lidocaine plus ketorolac

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of ketorolac tromethamine to local anesthesia for ankle block alters the quality or duration of analgesia after podiatric surgery. The second aim was to determine the chemical stability of ketorolac tromethamine when added to local anesthetic solutions. METHODS: The study design was double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and randomized. Seventy-nine American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II patients scheduled for bunionectomy or hammer toe repair, or both were randomized to 1 of 4 groups. Group L received plain 1.73% lidocaine for their ankle block. Group K received 1.73% lidocaine with ketorolac (4 mg/mL) added to the local solution. Group Kiv received 1.73% plain lidocaine for ankle block and 20 mg of ketorolac intravenously. Group E received 1.73% lidocaine with .67% ethanol added. The final concentration of lidocaine for all groups was 1.73%. The block performed in each patient was a 5-point ankle block. Beginning at 1 hour after the completion of the block and every 30 minutes thereafter, visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal pain scores were recorded. The time from performance of the block to the initial pain and time to the first oral pain medication intake were also recorded. The time and amount of postoperative oral analgesics in the first 9 hours after the block were recorded. Adverse events were also recorded for each group. RESULTS: There were significantly lower overall VAS and verbal pain scores for group K compared with groups E and L and group Kiv compared with group E. Group K also had a significantly longer time to the first reported pain and first oral pain medications than groups E and L, but not with Group Kiv. The same group had significantly fewer average doses of pain medications postoperatively than Groups E and L. Group E had significantly shorter times to first report of pain and first pain medications and higher mean dose of postoperative oral analgesics than group K and Group Kiv. There were no untoward side effects reported from any group. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography (GC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) showed no significant change in composition of the solutions when ketorolac was mixed with lidocaine and/or bupivacaine and stored at 37 degrees C for 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ketorolac to lidocaine for ankle block contributed to longer duration and better quality analgesia after foot surgery compared with plain 1.73% lidocaine or 1.73% lidocaine plus intravenous ketorolac. The ethanol vehicle is unlikely responsible for the analgesic effects of ketorolac. Ketorolac retains its chemical stability when placed in local solutions of lidocaine or bupivacaine.     

Continuous epidural administration of midazolam and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: Midazolam has been reported to have a spinally mediated analgesic effect. Clinically, single-shot epidural or spinal administration of midazolam has been shown to have an analgesic effect on perioperative pain. In this study, we investigated the analgesic effect of continuous epidural administration of midazolam with bupivacaine on postoperative pain. METHODS: Four groups of 20 patients who underwent gastrectomy or cholecystectomy were studied. Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine 100 mg (Group C), bupivacaine 100 mg + midazolam 10 mg (Group M10), or bupivacaine 100 mg + midazolam 20 mg (Group M20) in 40 ml per 12 h was started after surgery using the balloon infuser. Group I received intermittent epidural bupivacaine (2.5 mg.ml-1) 6 ml every 2 h. When necessary, an indomethacin suppository and then a single epidural shot of bupivacaine (2.5 mg.ml-1) 6 ml was administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, analgesic area, analgesia score, and sedation score were monitored for 12 h postoperatively. Memory and frequencies of supplemental analgesia (indomethacin suppositories and epidural bupivacaine) were also checked. RESULTS: Group M20 showed a significantly wider area of pinprick analgesia and better analgesia scores than other groups. The need for rescue analgesics were significantly less in Group M20. Sedation and amnesia were more pronounced in Group M20 than the other groups. CONCLUSION: Adding midazolam (10 to 20 mg per 12 h) to continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative pain can provide a better analgesia, amnesia and sedation than bupivacaine alone.     

Epidural administration of low-dose morphine combined with clonidine for postoperative analgesia after lumbar disc surgery.

This study evaluates the efficacy and side effects of a low dose of epidural morphine combined with clonidine for postoperative pain relief after lumbar disc surgery. In 36 of 51 patients who accepted the procedure, an epidural catheter was inserted (L1-L2 level). General anesthesia was induced with propofol and sufentanil, and maintained with sevoflurane in O2/N2O. After emergence from anesthesia, epidural analgesia was initiated according to two randomly assigned protocols: 1 mg of morphine with 75 microg of clonidine (Group M) or 12.5 mg of bupivacaine with 75 microg of clonidine (Group B), in 10 mL saline. Piritramide was administered during the first postoperative 24 hours using a patient-controlled analgesia device (PCA). The following parameters were recorded: piritramide consumption during the first 24 hours; pain at rest during the first postoperative hours (D0), during the first night (D1), and during the first mobilization; [visual analogue scale (VAS)]; and the occurrence of drowsiness, motor blockade, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, itching, micturition problems, and bladder catheterization during D0 and D1. Epidural administration of morphine-clonidine significantly improved postoperative pain relief and reduced piritramide consumption as compared to epidural bupivacaine-clonidine. Side effects did not differ between groups except for a higher incidence of micturition problems in Group M during D1. The occurrence of bladder catheterization was not significantly higher in that group. We conclude that a low dose of epidural morphine combined with clonidine offers a better postoperative analgesia than does bupivacaine-clonidine. The excellent analgesic conditions were obtained at the expense of a higher incidence of difficulties in initiating micturition.     

Comparison of bupivacaine and fentanyl as an adjuvant of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia

We conducted a retrospective study to determine whether bupivacaine or fentanyl is a better adjuvant to epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia using 108 patients. Following epidural lidocaine anesthesia with or without light general anesthesia for major gynecological surgeries, 59 patients received epidural morphine (EPM) 2 mg (group M), 21 patients received morphine 2 mg plus 0.25% plain bupivacaine 6–10 ml epidurally (group B), and 28 patients received morphine 2 mg plus fentanyl 100 μg epidurally (group F). The analgesic interval, defined as the duration from EPM injection to the first request of analgesics for incisional pain, was significantly longer in group F than in group M (29±11vs 19±17 h,P<0.05), but similar to group B (22±14 h). Group F patients required the least amount of analgesics for incisional pain of the three groups during the first 24 h postoperatively (P<0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was similar among all three groups. In conclusion, fentanyl appears to be a better adjuvant to epidural morphine than bupivacaine.     

Femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty patients: a method to control postoperative pain

This study was designed to determine the effects of a single-injection femoral nerve block (FNB) using 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000, on pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty patients were randomly distributed into 2 groups: Group A received general anesthesia plus a FNB (n = 19), whereas Group B received general anesthesia plus a FNB with 30 mL of preservative-free saline (n = 21). The amount of morphine used, sedation, and average pain perception were measured for the first 24 hours and daily postoperatively. Group A used significantly less morphine (48.1 mg) compared with Group B, which used 76.2 mg during the first 24 hours after surgery (P = 0.003). Group A's sedation scale was significantly less than group B's (2.26 vs 2.67) (P = 0.045). The average pain perception was significantly different (P =.002). Postoperative management of pain following TKA can be improved through a preoperative single-injection FNB with 0.5% bupivacaine plus epinephrine 1:200,000. The cost is minimal, risks appear acceptable, and the procedure is efficacious.     

The effects of postoperative continuous epidural analgesia after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of continuous epidural analgesia on the postoperative pain and the early recovery after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG). METHODS: A total of 66 patients undergoing elective LAG were investigated for postoperative pain score and other variables retrospectively. RESULTS: Forty-four patients who had received epidural analgesia (E group) showed significantly lower pain scores for 2, 12 and 48 hours after surgery, compared with 22 patients who had received analgesics intramuscularly or transrectally (C group). The patients in the E group needed significantly less supplemental analgesics than those in C group for 2 and 12 hours after the operation. The early recovery and the incidence of postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that postoperative continuous epidural analgesia is effective for postoperative pain relief in patients after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy.     

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective and randomized study comparing regional epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of regional epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients who underwent PCNL. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients submitted to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were randomized into two groups: Group I (N = 26) received general anesthesia and Group II (N = 24) received regional epidural anesthesia. Demographic and operative data including age, BMI, stone position, stone size, postoperative pain, amount of postoperative analgesic usage, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit, adverse effects and surgical complications were compared between both groups. Results: Average pain score at 1 hour. was 6.88 in group I and 3.12 in group II (p < 0.001), at 4 hours. 5.07 in group I and 3.42 in group II (p = 0.025). Less morphine was required in the regional epidural anesthesia group compared to the general anesthesia group. Higher satisfaction was found in the regional epidural group. 6 (23.07 %) patients in Group I and 1 patient (4.19 %) in Group II had postoperative nausea and vomiting, respectively (p = 0.05). Pain score at 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit, length of hospital stay, and adverse effects were no different between the two groups. Conclusion: Regional epidural anesthesia is an alternative technique for PCNL which achieves more patient satisfaction, less early postoperative pain and less adverse effects from medication with the same efficacy and safety compared to general anesthesia.     

The effect of spinal bupivacaine in combination with either epidural clonidine and/or 0.5% bupivacaine administered at the incision site on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy

Spinal anesthesia has numerous advantages over general anesthesia for patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy and microdisk surgery. In this study, we evaluated the addition of epidural clonidine and/or bupivacaine, injected at the incision site, on postoperative outcome variables in patients undergoing lower spine procedures using spinal anesthesia. One hundred twenty patients having lumbar spine surgery received bupivacaine spinal anesthesia supplemented by 150 microg of epidural clonidine with or without incisional bupivacaine, epidural placebo plus incisional bupivacaine, or placebo with incisional saline. Demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamics, blood loss, pain, nausea, urinary retention, hospital discharge, and other variables were compared by using either analysis of variance or chi(2) analysis. Demographics were similar. IV fluids, blood loss, incidence of intraoperative bradycardia, and hypotension were not different among groups. Postanesthesia care unit pain scores were lower and demand for analgesics was less in patients who received both the clonidine and subcutaneous bupivacaine. Patients who received epidural clonidine also had improved postoperative hemodynamics. Hospital discharge, urinary retention, and other variables were not different. We conclude that epidural clonidine as a supplement to spinal anesthesia produced no perioperative complications and improved postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing lower spine procedures. IMPLICATIONS: Spinal anesthesia with supplemental epidural clonidine in combination with incision site subcutaneous bupivacaine was evaluated both intra- and postoperatively and compared with spinal anesthesia alone for lower lumbar spine procedures. Both epidural clonidine and subcutaneous incisional bupivacaine, added to spinal anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery, improves pain relief and reduces the need for postoperative opioids with their associated side effects.