Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed (1) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body FDG PET/CT for initial breast cancer staging with the accuracy of a conventional, multimodal imaging algorithm, and (2) to assess potential alteration in patient management based on the FDG PET/CT findings.

Methods

Patients with primary breast cancer (106 women, mean age 57?±?13?years) underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and conventional imaging (X-ray mammography, MR mammography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy and breast, axillary and liver ultrasonography). The diagnostic accuracies of FDG PET/CT and a conventional algorithm were compared. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in terms of primary tumour detection rate, correct assessment of primary lesion focality, T stage and the detection rates for lymph node and distant metastases. Histopathology, imaging or clinical follow-up served as the standards of reference.

Results

FDG PET/CT was significantly more accurate for detecting axillary lymph node and distant metastases (p?=?0.0125 and p?Conclusion Full-dose, intravenous contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT was more accurate than conventional imaging for initial breast cancer staging due to the higher detection rate of metastases and synchronous tumours, although the study had several limitations including a retrospective design, a possible selection bias and a relevant false-positive rate for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases. FDG PET/CT resulted in a change of treatment in a substantial proportion of patients.     

18F-FDG PET/CT with Contrast Enhancement for Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in T1 Breast Cancer

Background

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography ((PET) safely predicts axillary status in patients with breast cancer, but is not sufficiently accurate in early breast cancer patients. This study analyzed the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement in detecting axillary lymph node involvement in T1 breast cancer patients.

Methods

Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was performed within 20 days of surgery in 143 breast cancer patients with tumors ≤2 cm in size. The patients underwent either axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and histopathology reports were used to provide the definitive diagnosis against which the contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT study results were compared.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in detecting axillary involvement were 70.0%, 92.2%, 88.8%, and 77.8%, respectively, in the entire series of 143 patients, with eight false-positive and 12 false negative results. The false-negative results were associated with the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the rate of FDG uptake.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT cannot replace histologic staging using SLNB in patients with breast cancer, but ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT increases the sensitivity for predicting axillary node metastasis, and allows for a selective approach to either ALND or SLNB, even in patients with T1 breast cancer.     

The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan

Objectives

We aimed to compare the role of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT, FDG PET/CT and ^99mTc-MDP bone scans in the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung, breast and prostate carcinoma.

Methods

This was a prospective study including patients for staging (S) and restaging (R). Seventy-two patients (23S, 49R) with infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma, 49 patients (25S, 24R) with prostate adenocarcinoma and 30 patients (17S, 13R) with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), without known bone metastases but with high risk/clinical suspicion for the same, underwent a ^99mTc-MDP bone scan, FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT within 2 weeks. All scans were reviewed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and the findings were correlated with MRI/thin-slice CT/skeletal survey. Histological verification was done wherever feasible.

Results

Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT was 100 % in all three malignancies, while that of FDG PET/CT was 79 % and 73 % in NSCLC, 73 % and 80 % in breast cancer and 72 and 65 % in prostate cancer. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of FDG PET/CT were 100 % in NSCLC and prostate and 97 % and 96 % in breast cancer. As compared to the ^99mTc-MDP bone scan, all parameters were superior for ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT in prostate and breast cancer, but sensitivity and NPV were equal in NSCLC. The MDP bone scan had superior sensitivity and NPV compared to FDG PET/CT but had low specificity and PPV.

Conclusion

To rule out bone metastases in cases where there is a high index of suspicion, ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is the most reliable investigation. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT has the potential to replace the ^99mTc-MDP bone scan for the detection of bone metastases.     

Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer

Objective

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent cancer occurring in the female genital tract in the Western countries. Because surgical staging is currently the standard, noninvasive techniques that accurately identify lymph node (LN) metastases would be beneficial by reducing costs and complications. The purpose of our study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting LN metastases in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.

Methods

Two hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients with endometrial cancer underwent preoperative PET/CT and MRI for staging. The malignancy criteria for LNs were a short diameter of 1 cm or more by MRI and focally increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by PET/CT. After evaluating PET/CT and MRI separately, morphologic and functional image findings were compared with the histological findings regarding LN metastasis for all patients. PET/CT and MRI images were classified on the basis of histological findings as true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, or false-negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated.

Results

Histologic examination revealed LN metastases in 51 patients (17.8 %). The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the primary lesions by PET/CT ranged from 1.4 to 37.7, with a mean value of 9.3, whereas those of the metastatic LNs ranged from 2.0 to 22.5 with a mean of 7.3. On a per-patient basis, node staging resulted in sensitivities of 70.0 % with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and 34.0 % with MRI, and specificities of 95.4 % with PET/CT and 95.0 % with MRI. The NPV of PET/CT was 94.3 %, and that of MRI was 87.2 %. On a lesion base analysis, sensitivity of PET/CT was 79.4 % while that of MRI was 51.6 %. In detecting distant metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of PET/CT were 92.9, 98.9, 98.6, 81.3, and 99.6 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT was better than MRI for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer both by patient basis and lesion basis analyses. Due to high NPV, FDG PET-CT could aid in selecting candidates for lymphadenectomy.

     

Diagnostic performance of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with background body suppression (DWIBS) in detection of lymph node and bone metastases from pediatric neuroblastoma

Objective

Recent many studies have shown that whole body “diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression” (DWIBS) seems a beneficial tool having higher tumor detection sensitivity without ionizing radiation exposure for pediatric tumors. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of whole body DWIBS and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for detecting lymph node and bone metastases in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma.

Methods

Subjects in this retrospective study comprised 13 consecutive pediatric patients with neuroblastoma (7 males, 6 females; mean age, 2.9?±?2.0 years old) who underwent both ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body DWIBS. All patients were diagnosed as neuroblastoma on the basis of pathological findings. Eight regions of lymph nodes and 17 segments of skeletons in all patients were evaluated. The images of ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy/SPECT-CT, bone scintigraphy/SPECT, and CT were used to confirm the presence of lymph node and bone metastases. Two radiologists trained in nuclear medicine evaluated independently the uptake of lesions in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and the signal-intensity of lesions in whole-body DWIBS visually. Interobserver difference was overcome through discussion to reach a consensus. The sensitivities, specificities, and overall accuracies of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body DWIBS were compared using McNemer’s test. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) of both modalities were compared using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

The total numbers of lymph node regions and bone segments which were confirmed to have metastasis in the total 13 patients were 19 and 75, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, PPV, and NPV of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for detecting lymph node metastasis from pediatric neuroblastoma were 100, 98.7, 98.9, 95.0, and 100%, respectively, and those for detecting bone metastasis were 90.7, 73.1, 80.3, 70.1, and 91.9%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, PPV, and NPV of whole-body DWIBS for detecting bone metastasis from pediatric neuroblastoma were 94.7, 24.0, 53.0, 46.4 and 86.7%, respectively, whereas those for detecting lymph node metastasis were 94.7, 85.3, 87.2, 62.1, and 98.5%, respectively. The low specificity, overall accuracy, and PPV of whole-body DWIBS for detecting bone metastasis were due to a high incidence of false-positive findings (82/108, 75.9%). The specificity, overall accuracy, and PPV of whole-body DWIBS for detecting lymph node metastasis were also significantly lower than those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for detecting lymph node metastasis, although the difference between these 2 modalities was less than that for detecting bone metastasis.

Conclusion

The specificity, overall accuracy, and PPV of whole-body DWIBS are significantly lower than those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT because of a high incidence of false-positive findings particularly for detecting bone metastasis, whereas whole-body DWIBS shows a similar level of sensitivities for detecting lymph node and bone metastases to those of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. DWIBS should be carefully used for cancer staging in children because of its high incidence of false-positive findings in skeletons.

     

FDG PET/CT for assessing the resectability of NSCLC patients with N2 disease after neoadjuvant therapy

Objective

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CMRT) is the most effective treatment of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study aimed at assessing FDG PET/CT for defining the response of N2 disease to neoadjuvant CMRT, as surgical resection after such therapy significantly improves 5-year survival in responding N2 disease.

Methods

Forty-five patients with locally advanced NSCLC underwent both pre-neoadjuvant therapy FDG PET/CT and post-neoadjuvant therapy FDG PET/CT followed by anatomical resection of lung and ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes (LN). Seventeen of these patients who had PET/CT studies in our institution and were operated after CMRT were retrospectively included in the study group (12 males, ages 43–78 years; stage IIIA: 14 patients, stage IIIB: 3 patients). PET/CT response in N2 was visually scored per-lymph node station and per patient. Quantitative N2 response was evaluated by SUV_max and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measurements after therapy alone and in comparison with pre-therapy values. PET/CT N2 response was confirmed at surgery.

Results

Seventeen NSCLC patients with 29 metastatic N2 lymph nodes (LN) were assessed. Histopathology confirmed 14 responders and 3 non-responders, and was available in 20/29 metastatic LN, showing complete response in 17 and residual disease in 3 LN. LN-based visual analysis of N2 response on PET/CT defined 3 TP, 16 TN and 1 FP, for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of 100, 94, 95, 100 and 75 %, respectively. Patient-based visual analysis defined 3 TP, 13 TN and 1 FP study, for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, NPV and PPV of 100, 93, 94, 100 and 75 %, respectively. Nodal-based quantitative analysis of FDG uptake in N2 nodes revealed a significant difference between responding and non-responding LN only of SUV_max post-therapy (2.5 ± 1.21 vs. 3.5 ± 2.36, P = 0.04).

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT after neoadjuvant therapy accurately defined response in metastatic N2 nodes of NSCLC patients, presenting very high sensitivity and NPV for detecting responding nodes. PET/CT may enable selection of candidates for curative resection of stage III NSCLC. Mediastinoscopy may not be mandatory in patients with a negative PET/CT after neoadjuvant therapy.

     

Pathology-based validation of FDG PET segmentation tools for volume assessment of lymph node metastases from head and neck cancer

Purpose

FDG PET is increasingly incorporated into radiation treatment planning of head and neck cancer. However, there are only limited data on the accuracy of radiotherapy target volume delineation by FDG PET. The purpose of this study was to validate FDG PET segmentation tools for volume assessment of lymph node metastases from head and neck cancer against the pathological method as the standard.

Methods

Twelve patients with head and neck cancer and 28 metastatic lymph nodes eligible for therapeutic neck dissection underwent preoperative FDG PET/CT. The metastatic lymph nodes were delineated on CT (Node_CT) and ten PET segmentation tools were used to assess FDG PET-based nodal volumes: interpreting FDG PET visually (PET_VIS), applying an isocontour at a standardized uptake value (SUV) of 2.5 (PET_SUV), two segmentation tools with a fixed threshold of 40 % and 50 %, and two adaptive threshold based methods. The latter four tools were applied with the primary tumour as reference and also with the lymph node itself as reference. Nodal volumes were compared with the true volume as determined by pathological examination.

Results

Both Node_CT and PET_VIS showed good correlations with the pathological volume. PET segmentation tools using the metastatic node as reference all performed well but not better than PET_VIS. The tools using the primary tumour as reference correlated poorly with pathology. PET_SUV was unsatisfactory in 35 % of the patients due to merging of the contours of adjacent nodes.

Conclusion

FDG PET accurately estimates metastatic lymph node volume, but beyond the detection of lymph node metastases (staging), it has no added value over CT alone for the delineation of routine radiotherapy target volumes. If FDG PET is used in radiotherapy planning, treatment adaptation or response assessment, we recommend an automated segmentation method for purposes of reproducibility and interinstitutional comparison.     

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging

Purpose

The aim of the study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and FDG PET/CT for breast cancer (BC) staging.

Methods

Twenty BC patients underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and 1.5-T DWI. Lesions with qualitatively elevated signal intensity on DW images (b?=?800 s/mm²) were rated as suspicious for tumour and mapped to individual lesions and different compartments (overall 552 lesions). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was determined for quantitative evaluation. Histopathology, MRI findings, bone scan findings, concordant findings between FDG PET/CT and DWI, CT follow-up scans and plausibility served as the standards of reference defining malignancy.

Results

According to the standards of reference, breasts harboured malignancy in 11, regional lymph nodes in 4, M1 lymph nodes in 3, bone in 7, lung in 2, liver in 3 and other tissues in 3 patients. On a compartment basis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of malignancies were 94, 99, 98, 97 and 98% for FDG PET/CT and 91, 72, 76, 50 and 96% for DWI, respectively. Of the lesions seen on DWI only, 348 (82%) turned out to be false-positive compared to 23 (11%) on FDG PET/CT. The average lesion ADC was 820?±?300 with true-positive lesions having 929?±?252 vs 713?±?305 in false-positive lesions (p?<?0.0001).

Conclusion

Based on these initial data DWI seems to be a sensitive but unspecific modality for the detection of locoregional or metastatic BC disease. There was no possibility to quantitatively distinguish lesions using ADC. DWI alone may not be recommended as a whole-body staging alternative to FDG PET(/CT). Further studies are necessary addressing the question of whether full-body MRI including DWI may become an alternative to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.     

18F-FDG PET/CT imaging versus dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer

Purpose

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer with a poor prognosis. Locoregional staging is based on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT or MRI. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of FDG PET/CT and DCE CT in locoregional staging of IBC and to assess their respective prognostic values.

Methods

The study group comprised 50 women (median age: 51?±?11 years) followed in our institution for IBC who underwent FDG PET/CT and DCE CT scans (median interval 5?±?9 days). CT enhancement parameters were net maximal enhancement, net early enhancement and perfusion.

Results

The PET/CT scans showed intense FDG uptake in all primary tumours. Concordance rate between PET/CT and DCE CT for breast tumour localization was 92 %. No significant correlation was found between SUVmax and CT enhancement parameters in primary tumours (p?>?0.6). PET/CT and DCE CT results were poorly correlated for skin infiltration (kappa?=?0.19). Ipsilateral foci of increased axillary FDG uptake were found in 47 patients (median SUV: 7.9?±?5.4), whereas enlarged axillary lymph nodes were observed on DCE CT in 43 patients. Results for axillary node involvement were fairly well correlated (kappa?=?0.55). Nineteen patients (38 %) were found to be metastatic on PET/CT scan with a significant shorter progression-free survival than patients without distant lesions (p?=?0.01). In the primary tumour, no statistically significant difference was observed between high and moderate tumour FDG uptake on survival, using an SUVmax cut-off of 5 (p?=?0.7 and 0.9), or between high and low tumour enhancement on DCE CT (p?>?0.8).

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT imaging provided additional information concerning locoregional involvement to that provided by DCE CT on and allowed detection of distant metastases in the same whole-body procedure. Tumour FDG uptake or CT enhancement parameters were not correlated and were not found to have any prognostic value.     

Can integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR replace sentinel lymph node resection in malignant melanoma?

Purpose

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT), 18F-FDG PET/magnetic resonance (18F-FDG PET/MR) and 18F-FDG PET/MR including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in the detection of sentinel lymph node metastases in patients suffering from malignant melanoma.

Material & Methods

Fifty-two patients with malignant melanoma (female: n =?30, male: n =?22, mean age 50.5?±?16.0 years, mean tumor thickness 2.28?±?1.97 mm) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent PET/MR & DWI for distant metastasis staging were included in this retrospective study. After hybrid imaging, lymphoscintigraphy including single photon emission computed tomography/CT (SPECT/CT) was performed to identify the sentinel lymph node prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). In a total of 87 sentinel lymph nodes in 64 lymph node basins visible on SPECT/CT, 17 lymph node metastases were detected by histopathology. In separate sessions PET/CT, PET/MR, and PET/MR & DWI were assessed for sentinel lymph node metastases by two independent readers. Discrepant results were resolved in a consensus reading. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values and negative predictive values were calculated with histopathology following SPECT/CT guided SLNB as a reference standard.

Results

Compared with histopathology, lymph nodes were true positive in three cases, true negative in 65 cases, false positive in three cases and false negative in 14 cases in PET/CT. PET/MR was true positive in four cases, true negative in 63 cases, false positive in two cases and false negative in 13 cases. Hence, we observed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 17.7, 95.6, 50.0 and 82.3% for PET/CT and 23.5, 96.9, 66.7 and 82.3% for PET/MR. In DWI, 56 sentinel lymph node basins could be analyzed. Here, the additional analysis of DWI led to two additional false positive findings, while the number of true positive findings could not be increased.

Conclusion

In conclusion, integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR does not reliably differentiate N-positive from N-negative melanoma patients. Additional DWI does not increase the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/MR. Hence, sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot be replaced by 18F-FDG-PE/MR or 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

     

Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) with or without computed tomography (CT) in post-treatment response assessment and/or surveillance imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

A systematic search of the indexed medical literature was done using appropriate keywords to identify relevant studies. Metrics of diagnostic test accuracy, viz. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were extracted from individual studies and combined using a random effects model to yield weighted mean pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The impact of timing of post-treatment scan, study quality and advancements in PET technology was explored through meta-regression.

Results

A total of 51 studies involving 2,335 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted mean (95% CI) pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of post-treatment FDG PET(CT) for the primary site was 79.9% (73.7?C85.2%), 87.5% (85.2?C89.5%), 58.6% (52.6?C64.5%) and 95.1% (93.5?C96.5%), respectively. Similar estimates for the neck were 72.7% (66.6?C78.2%), 87.6% (85.7?C89.3%), 52.1% (46.6?C57.6%) and 94.5% (93.1?C95.7%), respectively. Scans done ??12?weeks after completion of definitive therapy had moderately higher diagnostic accuracy on meta-regression analysis using time as a covariate.

Conclusion

The overall diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET(CT) for response assessment and surveillance imaging of HNSCC is good, but its PPV is somewhat suboptimal. Its NPV remains exceptionally high and a negative post-treatment scan is highly suggestive of absence of viable disease that can guide therapeutic decision-making. Timing of post-treatment imaging has a significant, though moderate impact on diagnostic accuracy.     

18F-FDG PET as a single imaging modality in pediatric neuroblastoma: comparison with abdomen CT and bone scintigraphy

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a single imaging agent in neuroblastoma in comparison with other imaging modalities.

Methods

A total of 30 patients with pathologically proven neuroblastoma who underwent FDG PET for staging were enrolled. Diagnostic performance of FDG PET and abdomen CT was compared in detecting soft tissue lesions. FDG PET and bone scintigraphy (BS) were compared in bone metastases. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary or recurrent lesions was calculated for quantitative analysis.

Results

Tumor FDG uptake was detected in 29 of 30 patients with primary neuroblastoma. On initial FDG PET, SUVmax of primary lesions were lower in early stage (I–II) than in late stage (III–IV) (3.03 vs. 5.45, respectively, p = 0.019). FDG PET was superior to CT scan in detecting distant lymph nodes (23 vs. 18 from 23 lymph nodes). FDG PET showed higher accuracy to identify bone metastases than BS both on patient-based analyses (100 vs. 94.4 % in sensitivity, 100 vs. 77.8 % in specificity), and on lesion-based analyses (FDG PET: 203 lesions, BS: 86 lesions). Sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET to detect recurrence were 87.5 % and 93.8, respectively.

Conclusion

FDG PET was superior to CT in detecting distant LN metastasis and to BS in detecting skeletal metastasis in neuroblastoma. BS might be eliminated in the evaluation of neuroblastoma when FDG PET is performed.     

Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of simultaneous ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT as well as their single components in head and neck cancer patients.

Methods

In a prospective study 17 patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for staging or follow-up and an additional ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI scan with whole-body imaging and dedicated examination of the neck. MRI, CT and PET images as well as PET/MRI and PET/CT examinations were evaluated independently and in a blinded fashion by two reader groups. Results were compared with the reference standard (final diagnosis determined in consensus using all available data including histology and follow-up). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

Results

A total of 23 malignant tumours were found with the reference standard. PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 82.7 %, a specificity of 87.3 %, a PPV of 73.2 % and a NPV of 92.4 %. Corresponding values for PET/MRI were 80.5, 88.2, 75.6 and 92.5 %. No statistically significant difference in diagnostic capability could be found between PET/CT and PET/MRI. Evaluation of the PET part from PET/CT revealed highest sensitivity of 95.7 %, and MRI showed best specificity of 96.4 %. There was a high inter-rater agreement in all modalities (Cohen’s kappa 0.61–0.82).

Conclusion

PET/MRI of patients with head and neck cancer yielded good diagnostic capability, similar to PET/CT. Further studies on larger cohorts to prove these first results seem justified.     

Prognostic value of interim FDG PET/CT in Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with interim response-adapted strategy: comparison of International Harmonization Project (IHP), Gallamini and London criteria

Purpose

Interim 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) has shown to be an accurate predictor of prognosis in Hodgkin??s lymphoma (HL). However, FDG PET response criteria are a matter of ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to confirm the prognostic value of interim PET/CT in HL patients treated with an interim response-adapted strategy and to compare the respective performances of different published criteria.

Methods

Newly diagnosed patients with HL underwent interim PET/CT after four courses of Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD). The treatment strategy was adapted according to prognostic factors at diagnosis and interim PET/CT and CT results. PET images were prospectively interpreted visually: a negative result was defined as no residual uptake above local background. All other findings were considered as positive. Retrospectively, interim PET/CT was analysed according to International Harmonization Project (IHP), Gallamini and London criteria

Results

The analysis included 90 patients; 6 of 31 patients with positive interim PET/CT and 7 of 59 patients with negative interim result presented treatment failure. The negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) for predicting 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 95 and 16%, respectively. With the other criteria, NPV remained very high (from 95 to 96%). The PPV increased from 19 to 45% according to the threshold used. Interim PET/CT was significantly correlated with PFS with Gallamini (p?=?0.01) and London criteria (p?<?0.0001).

Conclusion

Our study confirms the high NPV of interim PET/CT for predicting treatment outcome in HL and a probably better prognostic value using a higher threshold for positivity even after four cycles of chemotherapy as used in Gallamini and London criteria.     

Hypodense regions in unenhanced CT identify nonviable myocardium: validation versus 18F-FDG PET

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of hypodense regions in non-contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (unenhanced CT) to identify nonviable myocardial scar tissue.

Methods

Hypodense areas were visually identified in unenhanced CT of 80 patients in the left ventricular anterior, apical, septal, lateral and inferior myocardium and CT density was measured in Hounsfield units (HU). Findings were compared to ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography (FDG PET), which served as the standard of reference to distinguish scar (<50?% FDG uptake) from viable tissue (≥50?% uptake).

Results

Visually detected hypodense regions demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 74, 97, 84 and 94?%, respectively. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of mean HU at <28.8 for predicting scar tissue with an area under the curve of 0.93 yielding a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 94, 90, 67 and 99?%, respectively.

Conclusion

Hypodense regions in unenhanced cardiac CT scans allow accurate identification of nonviable myocardial scar tissue.     

The diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the initial assessment of high-grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma. A retrospective study of 89 patients

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for initial assessment in high-grade bone sarcomas (BS) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Methods

During the years 2001–2010, 89 patients (30 BS, 59 STS) referred for further evaluation and surgical treatment of a high-grade BS or STS also had a PET/CT scan performed for staging preoperatively (n?=?68) or within 1?month of surgery (n?=?21). Metastatic lesions suggested on the PET/CT scan were confirmed or rejected by histological evaluation, by additional imaging or by follow-up. In 68 patients (28 BS, 40 STS) the relationship between the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumour and survival was examined.

Results

The PET/CT scan suggested the presence of 13 metastatic lesions in BS patients (5 lymph node, 8 distant) and 21 metastatic lesions (6 lymph node, 15 distant) in STS patients. The calculated sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) were 95?% and 96?% for detection of distant metastases, and the predictive value (PV) of a positive or a negative test was 87?% and 98?%, respectively. SE and SP were 100?% and 90?% for detection of lymph node metastases, and the PV of a positive or a negative test was 27?% and 100?%, respectively. The 5-year survival was 81?% among patients with SUVmax below the median value (≤10), but was 33?% among those with SUVmax >10.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT for the initial assessment of patients with high-grade BS or STS was feasible with high SE and SP, but in those with lymph node metastases the PV of a positive test was low. The SUVmax of the primary tumour was a strong prognostic factor for survival.     

Additional value of integrated PET/CT over PET alone in the initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy

Objective

Clinical application of FDG-PET in head and neck cancer includes identification of metastases, unknown primary head and neck malignancy, or second primary carcinoma, and also recurrent tumor after treatment. In this study, the additional value of PET/CT fusion images over PET images alone was evaluated in patients with initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy.

Methods

Forty patients with suspected primary head and neck malignancy and 129 patients with suspected relapse after treatment of head and neck malignancy were included. FDG-PET/CT study was performed after the intravenous administration of FDG (5 MBq/kg). Target of evaluation was set at primary tumor, cervical lymph node, and whole body. PET images and PET with CT fusion images were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results of PET and PET/CT were compared with postoperative histopathological examination, and case by case comparison of PET and PET/CT results for each region was performed. The additional value of CT images over PET only images was assessed. Statistical differences in sensitivity and specificity were evaluated.

Results

In the comparative evaluation of 507 targets by PET alone and PET/CT, 401 targets showed agreement of the results. Of the 106 discordant targets, 103 showed a positive result on PET alone and negative result on PET/CT. These results showed a significant difference (p < 0.01). Sensitivity of PET/CT was slightly higher than that of PET without statistical significance, while specificity of PET/CT was significantly higher than that of PET alone (Initial staging: 90.5% vs. 62.2%, p < 0.01; Follow up: 97.2% vs. 74.4%, p < 0.01). In Fisher’s direct probability test, a significant difference was noted in the sensitivity (Initial staging: 91.3% vs. 87.0%, p < 0.01; Follow up: 93.9% vs. 91.4%, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Combined PET/CT showed improved diagnostic performance than PET alone by decreasing the number of false positive findings in patients with initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy.     

Impact of a second FDG PET scan before adjuvant therapy for the early detection of residual/relapsing tumours in high-risk patients with oral cavity cancer and pathological extracapsular spread

Purpose

Extracapsular spread (ECS) to the cervical lymph nodes is a major adverse prognostic factor in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We prospectively examined the value of FDG PET immediately before postoperative radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy (pre-RT/CCRT PET) to detect residual/relapsing disease in the early postsurgical follow-up period in high-risk OSCC patients with ECS.

Methods

We examined 183 high-risk OSCC patients with ECS who underwent preoperative FDG PET/CT for staging purposes. Of these patients, 29 underwent a second pre-RT/CCRT FDG PET/CT scan. The clinical utility of the second FDG PET/CT was examined using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis.

Results

Patients who underwent the second FDG PET/CT scan had baseline clinicopathological characteristics similar to those who did not undergo a second scan. Of the patients who underwent the second scan, seven (24?%) had unexpected, newly discovered lesions. Five eventually died of the disease, and two had no evidence of recurrence after a change in RT field and dose. In an event-based analysis at 2?months, rates of neck control (6/29 vs. 6/154, p?=?0.001), distant metastases (3/29 vs. 4/154, p?=?0.046), and disease-free survival (7/29 vs. 10/154, p?=?0.003) were significantly higher in patients who received a second PET scan than in those who did not. The second pre-RT/CCRT PET scan was of particular benefit for detecting new lesions in OSCC patients with both ECS and lymph node standardized uptake value (SUV) of ≥5.2 in the first PET scan.

Conclusion

The present findings support the clinical value of pre-RT/CCRT FDG PET for defining treatment strategy in OSCC patients with both ECS and high nodal SUV, even when FDG PET had already been performed during the initial staging work-up.     

FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancer

AIM: To determine whether or not fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) imaging when positive could obviate the necessity for sentinel lymph node biopsy and for complete axillary node dissection in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 80 female patients with a histological diagnosis of breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes underwent an FDG PET and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or total axillary dissection for staging of axilla. Both SLNB and axillary dissection were performed in 72 patients, while eight patients had total axillary dissection without SLN biopsy. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 36 had lymph node metastasis on histopathology. SLNB was positive for metastasis in 35 (97%) of 36 patients (29 macrometastasis and seven micrometastasis). In the patient with false negative SLNB, the lymph node was completely replaced by the tumour. The FDG PET was true positive in 16 of 36 patients (sensitivity, 44%). There were two false positive studies with FDG PET, resulting in a specificity of 95%. The positive predictive value and accuracy of FDG PET for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis were 89% and 72%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that higher grade of tumour, increased size and number of axillary lymph nodes were significantly associated with positive FDG PET results for axillary staging. CONCLUSION: FDG PET cannot replace histological staging using SLNB in patients with breast cancer. However, FDG PET has a high specificity and positive predictive value for staging of the axilla in these patients. The patients with higher grade of tumour, larger size and higher number of axillary lymph nodes may be considered for FDG PET scan for axillary staging.     

Hounsfield units upon PET/CT are useful in evaluating metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objectives

This study evaluated the usefulness of measurements of X-ray attenuation (in Hounsfield units) obtained from unenhanced CT images for attenuation correction of the positron emission tomography (PET) data from PET/CT in the assessment of regional lymph node metastasis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

17 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent surgery after evaluation with PET/CT. After the excised lymph nodes were reviewed, we compared the histopathology and PET/CT findings, and analysed the lymph node metastasis. When 18-F fludeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the lymph nodes was focally prominent in comparison with background mediastinal activity (regardless of lymph node size), the lymph nodes were considered to be positive for malignancy by PET/CT. The mean Hounsfield units of mediastinal lymph nodes showing abnormally increased FDG uptake in PET/CT was retrospectively evaluated using images from the unenhanced CT component of PET/CT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to determine the optimal cut-off value of mean Hounsfield units for detecting individual lymph node metastases.

Results

For depiction of malignant nodal groups in each lymph node group, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET/CT based on increased FDG uptake were 58.8%, 74.5% and 70.8%, respectively. For patients with nodal groups that were positive for uptake by PET/CT, the mean attenuation in lymph nodes as measured by CT was 48±13 HU for malignant nodes and 75±18 HU for benign nodes. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Using ROC curve analysis, we determined the cut-off as 71 HU. When we excluded lymph nodes with attenuation higher than 71 HU from the nodes determined as malignant by PET/CT, the specificity and accuracy for detecting metastatic lymph nodes improved to 90.9% and 83.3%, respectively.

Conclusions

When interpreting lymph node metastasis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma using PET/CT, the assumption that any lymph node with mean HU>71 is benign can improve diagnostic accuracy.Oesophageal cancer is an uncommon neoplasm, but it is often highly aggressive and associated with a poor prognosis. Accurate staging is essential to the management of patients with oesophageal cancer. In particular, the staging of regional lymph nodes is an important independent prognostic factor [1]. CT is the most widely used imaging technique for staging oesophageal cancer, but the detection of metastatic disease within normally sized lymph nodes by CT remains a challenge. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-F fludeoxyglucose (FDG) has been reported to be useful for the initial staging of patients with oesophageal cancer [2,3]. However, the poor spatial resolution of PET limits the localisation of small metastatic lymph nodes. Integrated PET and CT (PET/CT) is currently being used widely in patients with various cancers [4,5]. PET/CT combines anatomical and functional imaging and is superior to PET alone, especially in the assessment of locoregional lymph nodes in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma [6].However, we have experienced oesophageal cancer cases in which lymph nodes that were identified as having high FDG uptake upon PET/CT before surgery were proven benign upon pathological examination of the surgically excised tissue. In this study, we examined the usefulness of both measurements of X-ray attenuation in Hounsfield units taken from the unenhanced CT image component and FDG uptake in the PET/CT evaluation of lymph node metastasis in oesophageal cancer patients.