Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30° and 60° of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60° of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Fixed‐bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores neither the medial pivoting behavior nor the ligament forces of the intact knee in passive flexion

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an accepted treatment for isolated medial osteoarthritis. However, using an improper thickness for the tibial component may contribute to early failure of the prosthesis or disease progression in the unreplaced lateral compartment. Little is known of the effect of insert thickness on both knee kinematics and ligament forces. Therefore, a computational model of the tibiofemoral joint was used to determine how non‐conforming, fixed bearing medial UKA affects tibiofemoral kinematics, and tension in the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during passive knee flexion. Fixed bearing medial UKA could not maintain the medial pivoting that occurred in the intact knee from 0° to 30° of passive flexion. Abnormal anterior–posterior (AP) translations of the femoral condyles relative to the tibia delayed coupled internal tibial rotation, which occurred in the intact knee from 0° to 30° of flexion, but occurred from 30° to 90° of flexion following UKA. Increasing or decreasing tibial insert thickness following medial UKA also failed to restore the medial pivoting behavior of the intact knee despite modulating MCL and ACL forces. Reduced AP constraint in non‐conforming medial UKA relative to the intact knee leads to abnormal condylar translations regardless of insert thickness even with intact cruciate and collateral ligaments. This finding suggests that the conformity of the medial compartment as driven by the medial meniscus and articular morphology plays an important role in controlling AP condylar translations in the intact tibiofemoral joint during passive flexion. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1868–1875, 2018.

     

Medial collateral ligament insertion site and contact forces in the ACL-deficient knee.

The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency on medial collateral ligament (MCL) insertion site and contact forces during anterior tibial loading and valgus loading using a combined experimental-finite element (FE) approach. Our hypothesis was that ACL deficiency would increase MCL insertion site forces at the attachments to the tibia and femur and increase contact forces between the MCL and these bones. Six male knees were subjected to varus-valgus and anterior-posterior loading at flexion angles of 0 degrees and 30 degrees. Three-dimensional joint kinematics and MCL strains were recorded during kinematic testing. Following testing, the MCL of each knee was removed to establish a stress-free reference configuration. An FE model of the femur-MCL-tibia complex was constructed for each knee to simulate valgus rotation and anterior translation at 0 degrees and 30 degrees, using subject-specific bone and ligament geometry and joint kinematics. A transversely isotropic hyperelastic material model with average material coefficients taken from a previous study was used to represent the MCL. Subject-specific MCL in situ strain distributions were used in each model. Insertion site and contact forces were determined from the FE analyses. FE predictions were validated by comparing MCL fiber strains to experimental measurements. The subject-specific FE predictions of MCL fiber stretch correlated well with the experimentally measured values (R2 = 0.95). ACL deficiency caused a significant increase in MCL insertion site and contact forces in response to anterior tibial loading. In contrast, ACL deficiency did not significantly increase MCL insertion site and contact forces in response to valgus loading, demonstrating that the ACL is not a restraint to valgus rotation in knees that have an intact MCL. When evaluating valgus laxity in the ACL-deficient knee, increased valgus laxity indicates a compromised MCL.     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/ MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30 degrees and 60 degrees of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60 degrees of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30° and 60° of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60° of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: A human cadaveric study using robotic technology

Purpose: Although it is well known that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a primary restraint of the knee under anterior tibial load, the role of the ACL in resisting internal tibial torque and the pivot shift test is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of these 2 external loading conditions on the kinematics of the intact and ACL-deficient knee and the in situ force in the ACL. Type of Study: This study was a biomechanical study that used cadaveric knees with the intact knee of the specimen serving as a control. Materials and Methods: Twelve human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. This system applied (1) a 10–Newton meter (Nm) internal tibial torque and (2) a combined 10-Nm valgus and 10-Nm internal tibial torque (simulated pivot shift test) to the intact and the ACL-deficient knee. Results: In the ACL-deficient knee, the isolated internal tibial torque significantly increased coupled anterior tibial translation over that of the intact knee by 94%, 48%, and 19% at full extension, 15°, and 30° of flexion, respectively (P <.05). In the case of the simulated pivot shift test, there were similar increases in anterior tibial translation, i.e., 103%, 61%, and 32%, respectively (P <.05). Furthermore, the anterior tibial translation under the simulated pivot shift test was significantly greater than under an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05). Under the simulated pivot shift test, the in situ forces in the ACL were 83 ± 16 N at full extension and 93 ± 23 N at 15° of knee flexion. These forces were also significantly higher when compared with those for an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05). Conclusion: Our data indicate that the ACL plays an important role in restraining coupled anterior tibial translation in response to the simulated pivot shift test as well as under an isolated internal tibial torque, especially when the knee is near extension. These findings are also consistent with the clinical observation of anterior tibial subluxation during the pivot shift test with the knee near extension.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related surgery, Vol 16, No 6 (September), 2000: pp 633–639     

Characteristics of anterior tibial translation with active and isokinetic knee extension exercise before and after ACL reconstruction

 The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of anterior tibial translation (ATT) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient or -reconstructed knees with active and isokinetic knee extension exercise. Forty-nine patients with unilateral isolated ACL-deficient knees were enrolled. Follow-up examinations were carried out at a mean of 24 months postoperatively. An electrogoniometer system was applied to compare the amount of ATT in ACL-deficient and -reconstructed knees. For both active and isokinetic knee extension, the mean ATT of ACL-deficient knees was considerably greater than that for the normal side, within a range of flexion 0°–70° and 0°–60°, respectively. In contrast, no mean ATT differences were seen during both active and isokinetic exercise from 90° to 0° at follow-up. Within a range of flexion between 50° and 70°, the side-to-side difference in ATT with active knee extension was significantly greater than that with isokinetic extension in ACL-reconstructed knees. These results suggest that the amount of ATT is significantly improved with both active and isokinetic exercise, postoperatively. However, postoperative ATT with isokinetic extension is smaller than that with active knee extension from 50° to 70°. Received: October 17, 2001 / Accepted: December 26, 2001     

ACL transection influences mRNA levels for collagen type I and TNF-alpha in MCL scar.

To assess the mRNA expression of extracellular matrix genes which might correlate with or contribute to mechanically weaker medial collateral ligament (MCL) scars in the ACL-deficient rabbit knee joint compared to those in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) intact knee joints, a bilateral MCL injury was induced in 10 skeletally mature female NZW rabbits. As part of the same surgical procedure, the ACL was transected in one of the knees while the contralateral knee had a sham procedure. The side having the combined MCL and ACL injury was randomly assigned. After six weeks, the rabbits were euthanized. Histological assessments were performed on samples of the MCL scars from each operated knee (n = 3 animals) and mRNA levels for collagen type I, III, V, decorin, biglycan, lumican, fibromodulin, TGF-beta, IL-1, TNF-alpha, MMP-1, MMP-13, and a housekeeping gene (GAPDH) were assessed using semiquantitative RT-PCR on RNA isolated from the MCL scar tissue of the remaining animals (n = 7 animals). Levels of mRNA for each gene were normalized using the corresponding GAPDH value. Results showed that the total RNA yield (per mg wet weight) in the MCL scar of the ACL-deficient knee was significantly greater than that in the MCL scar from the ACL-intact knee. Collagen type I mRNA levels were significantly lower and mRNA levels for TNF-alpha were significantly greater in the scars of ACL-deficient knees compared to scars from ACL-intact joints. There were no significant differences between ACL-deficient and ACL-intact knees with respect to MCL scar mRNA levels for the remaining genes assessed. Histologically, the "flaw" area, which has been shown to correlate with mechanical properties in previous studies, was significantly greater in MCL scars from ACL-deficient knees than in the ACL-intact MCL scars. The mean number of cells/mm2 in MCL scars from ACL-deficient knees was significantly greater than in MCL scars from ACL-intact knees. The present study suggests that MCL scar cell metabolism is differentially influenced by the combined injury environment.     

Effects of the tibial tunnel position on knee joint stability and meniscal contact pressure after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundTo investigate the effect of the tibial tunnel position on knee stability and the maximum contact area and peak contact pressure on the menisci after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.MethodsTen human knee specimens (mean age: 74.1 ± 15.8 years) were used in this study. The anterior tibial loading test was conducted using a material testing machine at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion, with the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the maximum contact area and peak contact pressure on the menisci measured. Outcome measures were compared between the following groups: 1) intact ACL (intact group); 2) anatomical tibial tunnel position (anatomical group) and 3) posterior tibial tunnel position (posterior group) with double-bundle reconstruction, and 4) ACL-deficient (deficient group).ResultsIn response to a 100 N anterior tibial load, the ATT was greater for the posterior and ACL-deficient groups compared to that in the intact group. The normalized maximum contact area of the medial meniscus significantly decreased for the posterior group compared to that in the intact group. The normalized peak contact pressure on the medial meniscus increased in all groups compared to that in the intact group, but with no between-group differences in pressure applied to the lateral meniscus.ConclusionsATT and contact pressure on the medial meniscus increased, concomitant with a decrease in contact area of the medial meniscus, as the position of the tibial tunnel position moved towards a posterior position.     

Influence of patellar ligament insertion angle on quadriceps usage during walking in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed subjects

Reduced quadriceps contraction has been suggested as an adaptation to prevent anterior tibial translation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. This theory has been supported by a recent study that peak knee flexion moment (thought to be created by a decrease of quadriceps contraction) during walking was negatively correlated with patellar ligament insertion angle (PLIA) in ACL-deficient knees, but not in contralateral, uninjured knees. In addition, the PLIA was significantly smaller in ACL-deficient knees than in contralateral, uninjured knees. However, it is unknown whether ACL reconstruction restores the PLIA or whether the relationship between the PLIA and knee flexion moments previously observed in ACL-deficient knees disappears. This study tested the following hypotheses: (1) The PLIA of ACL-reconstructed knees is significantly smaller than the PLIA of uninjured contralateral knees; (2) Peak knee flexion moment (balanced by net quadriceps moment) during walking is negatively correlated with the PLIA in ACL-reconstructed knees. The PLIA of 24 ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knees were measured using MRI, and peak knee flexion moments during walking were measured. Results showed that the PLIA of ACL-reconstructed (22.9 ± 4.4°) knees was not significantly smaller (p = 0.09, power = 0.99) than the PLIA of contralateral (24.1 ± 4.8°) knees. Peak knee flexion moment was not correlated with the PLIA following ACL reconstruction (R² = 0.016, power = 0.99). However, the magnitude of the knee flexion moment remained significantly lower in ACL-reconstructed knees. In summary, this study has shown that the PLIA of ACL-reconstructed knees returned to normal and that patients no longer adapt their gait in response to the PLIA, though quadriceps function did not return to normal levels. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27: 730–735, 2009     

ACL forces and knee kinematics produced by axial tibial compression during a passive flexion–extension cycle

Application of axial tibial force to the knee at a fixed flexion angle has been shown to generate ACL force. However, direct measurements of ACL force under an applied axial tibial force have not been reported during a passive flexion–extension cycle. We hypothesized that ACL forces and knee kinematics during knee extension would be significantly different than those during knee flexion, and that ACL removal would significantly increase all kinematic measurements. A 500 N axial tibial force was applied to intact knees during knee flexion–extension between 0° and 50°. Contact force on the sloping lateral tibial plateau produced a coupled internal + valgus rotation of the tibia, anterior tibial displacement, and elevated ACL forces. ACL forces during knee extension were significantly greater than those during knee flexion between 5° and 50°. During knee extension, ACL removal significantly increased anterior tibial displacement between 0° and 50°, valgus rotation between 5° and 50°, and internal tibial rotation between 5° and 15°. With the ACL removed, kinematic measurements during knee extension were significantly greater than those during knee flexion between 5° and 45°. The direction of knee flexion–extension movement is an important variable in determining ACL forces and knee kinematics produced by axial tibial force. © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 32:89–95, 2014.     

MRI analysis of in vivo meniscal and tibiofemoral kinematics in ACL-deficient and normal knees.

The objectives of this study were to analyze simultaneously meniscal and tibiofemoral kinematics in healthy volunteers and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient patients under axial load-bearing conditions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ten healthy volunteers and eight ACL-deficient patients were examined with a high-field, closed MRI system. For each group, both knees were imaged at full extension and partial flexion ( approximately 45 degrees ) with a 125N compressive load applied to the foot. Anteroposterior and medial/lateral femoral and meniscal translations were analyzed following three-dimensional, landmark-matching registration. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibilities were less than 0.8 mm for femoral translation for image processing and data analysis. The position of the femur relative to the tibia in the ACL-deficient knee was 2.6 mm posterior to that of the contralateral, normal knee at extension. During flexion from 0 degrees to 45 degrees , the femur in ACL-deficient knees translated 4.3 mm anteriorly, whereas no significant translation occurred in uninjured knees. The contact area centroid on the tibia in ACL-deficient knees at extension was posterior to that of uninjured knees. Consequently, significantly less posterior translation of the contact centroid occurred in the medial tibial condyle in ACL-deficient knees during flexion. Meniscal translation, however, was nearly the same in both groups. Axial load-bearing MRI is a noninvasive and reproducible method for evaluating tibiofemoral and meniscal kinematics. The results demonstrated that ACL deficiency led to significant changes in bone kinematics, but negligible changes in the movement of the menisci. These results help explain the increased risk of meniscal tears and osteoarthritis in chronic ACL deficient knees.     

In situ force in the anterior cruciate ligament,the lateral collateral ligament,and the anterolateral capsule complex during a simulated pivot shift test

The role of the anterolateral capsule complex in knee rotatory stability remains controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the anterolateral capsule, the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), and the forces transmitted between each region of the anterolateral capsule in response to a simulated pivot shift test. A robotic testing system applied a simulated pivot shift test continuously from full extension to 90° of flexion to intact cadaveric knees (n = 7). To determine the magnitude of the in situ forces, kinematics of the intact knee were replayed in position control mode after the following procedures were performed: (i) ACL transection; (ii) capsule separation; (iii) anterolateral capsule transection; and (iii) LCL transection. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed to compare in situ forces between each knee state (*p < 0.05). The in situ force in the ACL was significantly greater than the forces transmitted between each region of the anterolateral capsule at 5° and 15° of flexion but significantly lower at 60°, 75°, and 90° of flexion. This study demonstrated that the ACL is the primary rotatory stabilizer at low flexion angles during a simulated pivot shift test in the intact knee, but the anterolateral capsule plays an important secondary role at flexion angles greater than 60°. Furthermore, the contribution of the “anterolateral ligament” to rotatory knee stability in this study was negligible during a simulated pivot shift test. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:847–853, 2018.

     

Anterolateral rotational knee instability: role of posterolateral structures

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the anterolateral rotational instability (ALRI) of the human knee after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and after additional injury of the different components of the posterolateral structures (PLS). It was hypothesized that a transsection of the ACL will significantly increase the ALRI of the knee and furthermore that sectioning the PLS [lateral collateral ligament (LCL), popliteus complex (PC)] will additionally significantly increase the ALRI. Materials and methods Five human cadaveric knees were used for dissection to study the appearance and behaviour of the structures of the posterolateral corner under anterior tibial load. Ten fresh-frozen human cadaver knees were subjected to anterior tibial load of 134 N and combined rotatory load of 10 Nm valgus and 4 Nm internal tibial torque using a robotic/universal force moment sensor (UFS) testing system and the resulting knee kinematics were determined for intact, ACL-, LCL- and PC-deficient (popliteus tendon and popliteofibular ligament) knee. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way ANOVA test with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. Results Sectioning the ACL significantly increased the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation under a combined rotatory load at 0 and 30° flexion (P < 0.05). Sectioning the LCL further increased the ALRI significantly at 0°, 30° and 60° of flexion (P < 0.05). Subsequent cutting of the PC increased the ATT under anterior tibial load (P < 0.05), but did not increase the ALRI (P > 0.05). Conclusion The results of the current study confirm the concept that the rupture of the ACL is associated with ALRI. Current reconstruction techniques should focus on restoring the anterolateral rotational knee instability to the intact knee. Additional injury to the LCL further increases the anterior rotational instability significantly, while the PC is less important. Cautions should be taken when examining a patient with ACL rupture to diagnose injuries to the primary restraints of tibial rotation such as the LCL. If an additional extraarticular stabilisation technique is needed for severe ALRI, the technique should be able to restore the function of the LCL and not the PC. This study is a winner of the AGA DonJoy Award 2006.     

Can suture repair of ACL transection restore normal anteroposterior laxity of the knee? An ex vivo study

Recent work has suggested the transected anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can heal and support reasonable loads if repaired with sutures and a bioactive scaffold; however, use of a traditional suture configuration results in knees with increased anterior–posterior (AP) laxity. The objective was to determine whether one of five different suture repair constructs when performed at two different joint positions would restore normal AP knee laxity. AP laxity of the porcine knee at 60° of flexion was evaluated for five suture repair techniques. Femoral fixation for all repair techniques utilized a suture anchor. Primary repair was to either the tibial stump, one of three bony locations in the ACL footprint, or a hybrid bony fixation. All five repairs were tied with the knee in first 30° and then 60° of flexion for a total of 10 repair constructs. Suture repair to bony fixation points within the anterior half of the normal ACL footprint resulted in knee laxity values within 0.5 mm of the ACL‐intact joint when the sutures were tied with the knee at 60° flexion. Suture repair to the tibial stump, or with the knee at 30° of flexion, did not restore normal AP laxity of the knee. Three specific suture repair techniques for the transected porcine ACL restored the normal AP laxity of the knee at the time of surgery. Additional studies defining the changes in laxity with cyclic loading and in vivo healing are indicated. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:1500–1505, 2008     

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopy Is the Gold Standard for Diagnosis of Meniscal Ramp Lesions: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Also May Be Helpful

Identifying and treating medial meniscal ramp lesions in conjunction with ligament reconstruction restores critical stability in knees with ligament injuries. This must begin with obtaining high-quality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and critical evaluation of the MRI and include a subsequent thorough arthroscopic examination of these knees. As evident in previous studies, most surgeons associate medial meniscal ramp lesions with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Biomechanical studies have reported that a ramp lesion produces significant anterior tibial translation and external rotational instability in ACL-deficient knees that is not reestablished with an isolated ACL reconstruction. In addition, recent research identified ramp lesions in one-third of multiligament knee injuries with an intact ACL and two-thirds of patients with posteromedial tibial plateau bone bruises on MRI. Restoring knee stability and biomechanics is necessary in treating all knee ligament injuries. Don’t miss the meniscal ramp lesion. Have a high index of suspicion, obtain a high-quality MRI,and arthroscopically evaluate the meniscocapsular junction of the medial meniscus, especially if there is a bone bruise seen on MRI.     

Dynamic elongation behavior in the medical collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments during lateral impact loading

The objectives of this experimental study were to determine (a) how quickly the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) elongate when a lateral impact force is imparted to the knee and if a person can react rapidly enough to provide protective muscle forces in the case of such an impact. (b) if the MCL and the ACL elongate simultaneously during a lateral impact, and (c) if resection of the ACL affects elongation of the MCL during a lateral impact. Eight whole-leg cadaver specimens were used. Each leg was mounted vertically in a testing-frame with the knee in 0 and 30° of flexion. A submaximal impact was delivered from the lateral side by a pendulum instrumented with a force transducer. Elongation of the midsubstance of the MCL and the ACL was measured with Hall-effect displacement transducers. The ACL was resected and the entire test sequence was repeated. Following a lateral impact, elongation of the MCL and ACL reached peak values by 70 ms. This study indicated that contraction of the leg musculature would not protect the MCL and ACL from injury when a lateral impact load is applied to the knee. The MCL and the ACL never elongated simultaneously during a lateral impact. After lateral impact loading, the time required to reach maximum elongation (peak delay) averaged 52 ms in the anterior MCL fibers and 61 ms in the ACL when the knee was in 0° of flexion. At 30° of flexion, the peak delay averaged 38 ms in the anterior MCL fibers and 22 ms in the ACL. The peak delay of the ACL was significantly greater than that of the MCL at 0° of the flexion (p < 0.05). The opposite was true at 30° of flexion. Resection of the ACL had only minimal effect on the elongation behavior of the MCL.     

Soleus and gastrocnemius muscle loading decreases anterior tibial translation in anterior cruciate ligament intact and deficient knees

This study evaluated the effect of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles on dynamic knee stability by studying the effect of passive calf muscle loading on anterior tibial translation in normal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knees. Anterior tibial translation was measured bilaterally in 12 anesthetized patients with unilateral ACL-deficient knees using a KT-1000 arthrometer. An ankle-foot orthosis was used to passively dorsiflex the ankle and generate tension in the calf muscles. As the ankle flexion angle was progressively changed from 30 degrees plantar flexion to 10 degrees dorsiflexion, anterior tibial translation decreased 43% and 37% with manual maximum force in normal and ACL-deficient knees, respectively (P < .0001). These findings suggest that the calf muscles may function as dynamic knee stabilizers. Anterior tibial translation also was measured in four cadaver knees. Significant decreases were seen in anterior tibial translation with progressive ankle dorsiflexion in ACL-intact specimens and after the ACL had been cut (P < .05). This effect persisted when the gastrocnemius muscle was cut, but was lost when the soleus muscle was released. The data suggest that the soleus muscle may play a role in dynamically stabilizing the knee.     

Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement

Purpose: To study how well an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixed at the 10 and 11 o'clock positions can restore knee function in response to both externally applied anterior tibial and combined rotatory loads by comparing the biomechanical results with each other and with the intact knee. Type of Study: Biomechanical experiment using human cadaveric specimens. Methods: Ten human cadaveric knees (age, 41±13 years) were reconstructed by placing a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft at the 10 and 11 o'clock positions, in a randomized order, and then tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Two external loading conditions were applied: (1) 134 N anterior tibial load with the knee at full extension, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and (2) a combined rotatory load of 10 N-m valgus and 5 N-m internal tibial torque with the knee at 15° and 30° of flexion. The resulting kinematics of the reconstructed knee and in situ forces in the ACL graft were determined for each femoral tunnel position. Results: In response to a 134-N anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation (ATT) for both femoral tunnel positions was not significantly different from the intact knee except at 90° of knee flexion as well as at 60° of knee flexion for the 10 o'clock position. There was no significant difference in the ATT between the 10 and 11 o'clock positions, except at 90° of knee flexion. Under a combined rotatory load, however, the coupled ATT for the 11 o'clock position was approximately 130% of that for the intact knee at 15° and 30° of flexion. For the 10 o'clock position, the coupled ATT was not significantly different from the intact knee at 15° of flexion and approximately 120% of that for the intact knee at 30° of flexion. Coupled ATT for the 10 o'clock position was significantly smaller than for the 11 o'clock position at 15° and 30° of flexion. The in situ force in the ACL graft was also significantly higher for the 10 o'clock position than the 11 o'clock position at 30° of flexion in response to the same loading condition (70 ± 18 N v 60 ± 15 N, respectively). Conclusions: The 10 o'clock position more effectively resists rotatory loads when compared with the 11 o'clock position as evidenced by smaller ATT and higher in situ force in the graft. Despite the fact that ACL grafts placed at the 10 or 11 o'clock positions are equally effective under an anterior tibial load, neither femoral tunnel position was able to fully restore knee stability to the level of the intact knee.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 19, No 3 (March), 2003: pp 297–304