The effect of premature atrial depolarization on sinus node automaticity in man.

Sino-atrial conduction time (SACT) may be calculated from the difference between the length of the return cycle and the spontaneous cycle, using programmed premature atrial stimulation during spontaneous sinus rhythm. This approach to sinoatrial conduction assumes that sinus node automaticity is not changed by premature depolarization. In order to validate this assumption, we compared the length of the post-return cycles to the spontaneous cycle length in 71 patients. Patients were grouped according to clinical diagnosis and the value of calculated SACT. At long coupling intervals at which no reset of the sinus node occurred there was only a small prolongation of the post-return cycles (less than 8.4 msec, on an average) compared to the spontaneous cycle length. This suggests no or only an insignificant effect of premature depolarization on the sinus node. However, during test stimuli leading to reset of the sinus node, the post-return cycles were significantly prolonged between 20 to 30 msec, on an average. The response of the individual cases sometimes varied to a great extent. In patients who demonstrated a progressive linear prolongation of the return cycles at decremental shortening of the test interval, there was no significant prolongation of the post-return cycles versus the spontaneous cycle length. We conclude that 1) premature depolarization of the sinus node may have a depressant effect on sinus node automaticity, which, if present, is usually small; 2) calculation of SACT using the extrastimulus technique may overestimate true SACT.     

Effect of nifedipine on the sick sinus syndrome

The effect of nifedipine (N) on sinus node (SN) function was studied in 15 patients (9 males, 6 females) sixty-two to seventy-six (mean 68.1 +/- 11) years old, with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). SSS was characterized electrophysiologically by a prolonged corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT greater than 535 msec) and/or prolonged sinoatrial conduction time (SACT greater than 125 msec), assessed by applying premature atrial stimulation. Ten mg N was given sublingually, and CSNRT and SACT were again evaluated sixty minutes after N administration, and again ten minutes after 1.5 mg atropine (A) was given IV. Heart rate increased significantly after N (p less than 0.005), systolic blood pressure (SBP) diminished significantly (p less than 0.005), and CSNRT and SACT shortened significantly (p less than 0.005, p less than 0.005) and became normal in 7 and 5 patients respectively. After A administration, a further significant increase of heart rate (p less than 0.005) and decrease of CSNRT (p less than 0.005) and SACT (p less than 0.005) were observed. CSNRT and SACT became normal in 8 and 7 patients respectively. SBP remained stable.     

New application of direct sinus node recordings in man: assessment of sinus node recovery time

Sinus node recovery time (SNRT) is frequently used to assess sinus node function in patients with suspected sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Although SNRT is assumed to reflect sinus node automaticity, this assumption remains unproven. The purpose of this study was (1) to test the hypothesis that SNRT in patients with and without SSS reflects sinus node automaticity, and (2) to assess the role of sinoatrial conduction time in the measurement of SNRT. A total of 16 patients (mean +/- SD age 63 +/- 9 years), seven of which had SSS, form the basis of this report. An electrogram of the sinus node was obtained for each of the 16 patients, and overdrive pacing was performed in each at cycle lengths of 1000 to 300 msec. SNRT was measured (1) on the sinus node electrogram (direct method, measuring SNRTd) as the interval from the last pacing stimulus artifact to the onset of the upstroke slope of first postpacing sinus beat and (2) on the high right atrial electrogram (indirect method, measuring SNRTi). Results were as follows: (1) The longest SNRTd was significantly shorter than the longest SNRTi (989 +/- 304 vs 1309 +/- 356 msec, p less than .001). (2) For the first postpacing sinus beat there was a significant prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time as compared with that for sinus beats before pacing (319 +/- 152 vs 99 +/- 35 msec, p less than .001). Sinoatrial conduction time normalized within 3.6 +/- 0.96 postpacing sinus beats. (3) At the pacing cycle length that resulted in the longest recovery time, sinus node depression was seen in 56% of patients, sinus node acceleration was noted in 26%, and no appreciable change in sinus node automaticity was observed in 19%. (4) Sinoatrial conduction time for the sinus beat before pacing and that for the first postpacing beat was longer in patients with SSS when compared with in patients without SSS. (5) In patients with SSS the abnormal SNRTi, when corrected for the degree of prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, became normal in five of six patients. We conclude that (1) SNRTi reflects both sinus node automaticity and sinoatrial conduction time, whereas SNRTd reflects sinus node automaticity, (2) overdrive atrial pacing results in marked prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, which is longer in patients with SSS when compared with in those without SSS, and (3) in patients with SSS the inference of abnormal sinus node automaticity on the basis of a prolonged corrected SNRTi is usually incorrect.     

Sinus node electric activity in prolonged atrial pauses in subjects with the sick sinus syndrome

Sinus node electrogram (SNE) was recorded in 15 patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in which prolonged atrial pauses were observed. The aim of this study was clarify the physiopathological mechanisms underlying atrial pauses as well as to evaluate the sensitivity of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) directly measured on SNE and of SACT estimated with the indirect Strauss method with respect to the detection of SSS. The following results were obtained: Sinus electrical activity was recorded during atrial pauses (greater than or equal to 2 basic sinus cycle length) in all the 9 patients in which the pauses spontaneously occurred and in the 2 patients in whom the pauses of 2860 and 3190 msec were induced by atrial pacing. In one of these latter two patients, moreover, a complete electrical desynchronization was observed. In the remaining 4 patients in whom, pauses (greater than or equal to 3 sec) were induced by carotid sinus massage of in 3 no sinus electrical activity was detected on SNE while in 1 advanced sinus node desynchronization was observed. Direct sinoatrial conduction time was abnormally prolonged in 6 patients with SSS and indirect sinoatrial conduction time in 9 patients.     

Direct stimulation of the sinus node in man. A possible explanation for an unusual finding during premature atrial stimulation.

An atypical behavior of the postextrasystolic pauses was observed in a 19-yr-old patient studied by His bundle electrography and programmed premature atrial stimulation. In the normal case there is a prolongation of the postextrasystolic pauses compared to the spontaneous cycle length allowing calculation of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT). In this case there were constant postextrasystolic pauses during the whole range of prematurity which were identical to the spontaneous cycle length. It is suggested that the catheter tip was accidentally positioned at the sinus node itself. The lengths of the spontaneous cycles, of the return cycles, and of the postreturn cycles showed no significant differences. Thus, one may assume that sinus node automaticity was not influenced in this case.     

Improved sinus node sensing after atropine.

Although atropine is known to increase sinus rate through its vagolytic effect, the effects of atropine on sinus node sensing are unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate alterations in sinus node sensing produced by atropine. Measurement of the zone of sinus node reset and sinoatrial conduction time was performed in 10 patients by programmed premature atrial stimulation. The zone of sinus node reset was determined as the transition point where premature atrial stimuli were followed by a less than compensatory pause. Sinoatrial conduction time was calculated from sinus node return cycles in the area where sinus node reset occurred. Atropine administration produced a significant increase in the percentage of the sinus cycle length at which premature atrial contractions penetrated and reset the sinus node. Sinus node reset occurred at a mean percentage of the sinus cycle of 71 +/- 8 per cent before atropine and 83 +/- 5 per cent after atropine (P less 0.01). The sinoatrial conduction time was significantly reduced from 109 +/- 29 to 62 +/- 23 msec. (P less than 0.01) from atropine as sinus cycle length was reduced from 909 +/- 118 to 642 +/- 75 msec. after atropine. Sinus node echoes were observed in two patients. In one patient atropine abolished the appearance of sinus node echoes. In the second patient atropine reduced the coupling interval necessary to produce sinus node echoes but appeared to facilitate sinus node re-entry by the appearance of an additional sinus node echo and a reduction in the echo cycle length. This study demonstrates that atropine produces significant improvement of sinus node sensing in man.     

Indirectly estimated sinoatrial conduction time by the atrial premature stimulus technique: Patterns of error and the degree of associated inaccuracy as assessed by direct sinus node electrography

The atrial premature stimulus method for estimating sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) is commonly used. When the stimulated atrial premature depolarization (APD) does not appear to affect sinus node automaticity or conduction, the indirectly estimated SACT (SACT_I) is quite accurate. That is, SACT_I correlates quite highly with SACT measured directly (SACT_D) on sinus node electrograms (SNE). In this study we used direct SNE recordings in 17 patients to assess SACT_I when factors thought to produce inaccuracy in SACT_I were present. Three patients had sinoatrial entrance block, which might make some expect sinoatrial exit delay to be present. However, SACT_D was normal in two (60 and 70 msec) and prolonged (130 msec) only in the one who had other evidence of sinus node dysfunction. Therefore, sinoatrial entrance block does not necessarily indicate sinoatrial exit delay. Thirteen patients had apparent depression of sinus node automaticity by the induced APD (A₃A₄ > A₁A₁). In all 13, SACT, overestimated SACT_D. One patient had apparent sinoatrial conduction delay induced by the APD and/or vagal transmitter release induced by the APD. In this patient, too, SACT_I exceeded SACT_D. Thus when sinoatrial automaticity or conduction are depressed by the stimulated APD, SACT_I will overestimate SACT_D. if SACT_I is normal, SACT_D will be normal; however, if SACT_I is prolonged, SACT_D may or may not be prolonged.     

Electrophysiologic effects of propranolol on sinus node function in children

Little is known regarding the effects of propranolol (P) on sinus node function in children. In this study, corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) and estimated sinoartial conduction time (SACT) were measured in 10 children (ages 3 to 16 years; mean 8.3 years) without clinical evidence of sinus node dysfunction before and after intravenous P. The spontaneous sinus cycle length (SCL) increased after P(0.1 mg/kg) in all patients. Mean SCL increased 13.4% from 635 ± 200 msec (± SD) to 720 ± 202 msec (p < 0.01). Maximum CSNRT increased in nine patients after P and mean CSNRT increased 63% from 203 ± 61 msec to 330 ± 190 msec (p < 0.05). SACT changed in a random fashion after P. Mean SACT did not change significantly. We conclude that P significantly suppresses sinus node automaticity in children with normal sinus node function but has little or no effect on sinoatrial conduction.     

Assessment of sinus node function in patients with congenital long QT syndrome

Sinus node function was evaluated in 4 patients with congenital long QT syndrome suffering from recurrent episodes of syncope and ventricular arrhythymias. Three of the 4 patients had bradycardia at rest on a 24-hour ECG. Sinus node function was examined by the atrial overdrive suppression test and the atrial premature stimulation test. Corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) was prolonged in all patients. Total sinoatrial conduction time was also prolonged in 2 of the 4 patients. In all patients with abnormally high values, these values returned to normal after atropine administration, except in one patient. His prolonged CSNRT remained high after atropine administration, indicating abnormal automaticity such as that seen in sick sinus syndrome. These results show that sinus node function in congenital long QT syndrome is often associated with autonomic dysfunction, and sometimes with intrinsic disturbances of sinoatrial conduction.     

First-degree sinoatrial heart block: sinoatrial block in the sick-sinus syndrome.

Sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) was estimated from the delay in the atrial recovery period after premature depolarization applied in that portion of atrial diastole when increasing prematurity resulted in a constant recovery interval. In 20 normal patients SACT was 169 msec. +/- 91 (2 S.D.). At least nine of 19 patients with "sick-sinus syndrome" (SSS) demonstrated SACT that were longer than seen in these normal subjects. SACT was prolonged in seven of nine SSS patients with abnormal A-V nodal conduction. Among 10 SSS patients with normal A-V conduction, only two had prolonged SACT. This study identifies first-degree sinoatrial block as a frequent manifestation of SSS associated with the presence of A-V node conduction abnormalities.     

The estimation of sinoatrial conduction time in rabbit heart by the constant atrial pacing technique.

This study compared estimates of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) obtained by constant atrial pacing (CAP) and premature atrial stimulation (PAS) with measured SACT in isolated rabbit right atrial preparations. Transmembrane potentials and surface electrograms were recorded from the sinus node and crista terminalis, respectively. The crista terminalis was paced 5, 10 and 15 beats/min faster than the spontaneous sinus rate with a train of eight pulses. Estimate of SACT by CAP was taken as the difference between the first atrial return cycle and the mean spontaneous cycle length. SACTs at 5, 10 and 15 beats/min faster were 76 +/- 10, 86 +/- 10 and 96 +/- 10 msec (mean +/- SEM; n = 12), respectively; correlation coefficients with the true SACT were 0.7, 0.54 and 0.4. Consecutive determinations of SACT by PAS and CAP in the same preparation (n = 6) at 10 beats/min faster gave SACTs of 86 +/- 13 and 79 +/- 14 msec, respectively, compared with true SACTs of 79 +/- 10 msec. Shortening of sinus node action potential, depression of automaticity and shifts in the site of the primary pacemaker contributed to the errors in both techniques. Estimation of SACT by CAP may be further complicated by failure of sinus node capture. Principles to minimize some of these errors are also presented.     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Comparative study of two methods of estimating sinoatrial conduction time in man

Programmed premature atrial stimulation has been widely used to estimate sinoatrial conduction time in man. A proposed new approach uses continuous atrial pacing just above the spontaneous cycle length. Sinoatrial conduction time is represented by the difference between the first cycle after pacing and the spontaneous cycle length, assuming that sinus nodal automaticity is undisturbed by continuous atrial pacing.

Both techniques were compared in 23 consecutive patients. Mean (± standard deviation) sinoatrial conduction time was 113 ± 27 msec estimated with the premature stimulus technique and 96 ± 48 msec when estimated with the continuous pacing technique. In about 30 percent of cases the two values corresponded well with each other. In the remaining patients sinoatrial conduction time estimated with the premature stimulus technique was longer than the time estimated with continuous atrial pacing. Additionally, the latter was estimated at two different rates of pacing in which the cycle length was 30 and 60 msec, respectively, shorter than the previous cycle length. The estimate then increased to 119 ± 39 and 136 ± 40 msec, respectively. Sinoatrial conduction time estimated with continuous atrial pacing did not depend on spontaneous cycle length and did not correlate with sinus nodal recovery time. The cycles after the first pause were slightly longer than the spontaneous cycle length.

The results suggest that data from the two techniques cannot be easily compared and that premature atrial stimulation may exert a more depressive effect on sinus nodal automaticity than continuous atrial pacing. The observed differences in results may also be due to a more pronounced delay of retrograde conduction during premature atrial stimulation than during continuous atrial pacing. It is also possible that continuous atrial pacing leads to some overdrive exciting effect on the sinus node, although the opposite effect is suggested by the response of the cycles after the first postpacing cycle. A final conclusion regarding the validity of each technique cannot be reached on the basis of these clinical data.     

窦房传导检测方法对比及其临床应用

为选择最佳经食管心房调搏检测窦房传导时间(SACT)方法,本文对42例正常者、窦性心动过缓和病态窦房结综合征者采用早搏刺激法(PAS)和连续起搏法(CAP)自身对照分析,认为PAS法对窦房结干扰小,结果可靠。采用Breithardt公式计算SACT可减小窦房结节律重整误差。常规剂量阿托品、普萘洛尔静注阻滞植物神经对提高SACT正确性的临床意义尚有待探讨。     

Sinus node sequences after atrial stimulation: similarities of effects of different methods

Sinoatrial conduction is commonly assessed from features of the initial cycle after a single atrial extrastimulus or eight beats atrial pacing. In contrast, sinus node automaticity is assessed by the duration of the first interval after prolonged atrial pacing. The return cycle and initial sequences after these different methods were compared in 10 subjects with normal sinus node function and 30 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Typically, sequences after all three methods showed a maximally prolonged first interval with a progressive decrease over five or more cycles. A model of recovery from overdrive suppression was used to compute the elements of conduction time and automaticity in the first interval. The sequences which followed a single extrastimulus and pacing were similar, the only index which increased significantly with prolonged pacing was associated with the degree of suppression of automaticity. The computed component of sinoatrial conduction in the return cycle was similar for all three methods. Thus all three conventional methods which consider only the initial post-stimulation interval measure both sinoatrial conduction and sinus node automaticity. The separate components of automaticity and conduction may be assessed by analysis of the total sequence.     

Sinus node sequences after atrial stimulation: similarities of effects of different methods.

Sinoatrial conduction is commonly assessed from features of the initial cycle after a single atrial extrastimulus or eight beats atrial pacing. In contrast, sinus node automaticity is assessed by the duration of the first interval after prolonged atrial pacing. The return cycle and initial sequences after these different methods were compared in 10 subjects with normal sinus node function and 30 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Typically, sequences after all three methods showed a maximally prolonged first interval with a progressive decrease over five or more cycles. A model of recovery from overdrive suppression was used to compute the elements of conduction time and automaticity in the first interval. The sequences which followed a single extrastimulus and pacing were similar, the only index which increased significantly with prolonged pacing was associated with the degree of suppression of automaticity. The computed component of sinoatrial conduction in the return cycle was similar for all three methods. Thus all three conventional methods which consider only the initial post-stimulation interval measure both sinoatrial conduction and sinus node automaticity. The separate components of automaticity and conduction may be assessed by analysis of the total sequence.     

Electrophysiologic effects of atropine on sinus node and atrium in patients with sinus nodal dysfunction

Electrophysiologic studies were conducted in 21 patients with sinus nodal dysfunction before and after intravenous administration of 1 to 2 mg of atropine. The mean sinus cycle length (± standard error of the mean) was 1,171 ± 35 msec before and 806 ± 29 msec after administration of atropine (P < 0.001). Mean sinus nodal recovery time determined at a paced rate of 130/min and maximal recovery time were, respectively, 1,426 ± 75 and 1,690 ± 100 msec before and 1,169 ± 90 and 1,311 ± 111 msec after atropine (P < 0.001 and < 0.001). Mean calculated sinoatrial conduction time, measured in 16 patients, was 113 ± 8 msec before and 105 ± 9.7 msec after atropine (difference not significant). Mean atrial effective refractory period, measured at an equivalent driven cycle length, was 262 ± 11.1 msec before and 256 ± 10.3 msec after atropine (not significant). Mean atrial functional refractory period was 302 ± 12.5 msec before and 295 ± 11.3 msec after atropine (not significant).

The shortening of sinus cycle length and sinus recovery time with atropine was similar to that noted in patients without sinus nodal dysfunction. In contrast, atropine had insignificant effects on sinoatrial conduction and atrial refractoriness in this group whereas it shortens both in normal subjects. This finding may reflect altered perinodal and atrial electrophysiologic properties in patients with sinus node disease.     

Sinus node automaticity and sinoatrial conduction]

In 64 patients so-called sino-atrial conduction time (SACT) was calculated by means of the extrastimulus technique. The normal value of this parameter was 82 plus or minus 18.7 ms (20 patients). Plotting SACT versus heart rate in all patients no correlation could be found. However, in 4 patients with spontaneous variations of the sinus cycle length a short SACT was calculated after long spontaneous intervals and vice verse. These results may indicate that SACT ist frequency-dependent. However, it is not clear whether the behaviour of the postextra-systolic pauses in these patients is due to changes of SACT or due to spontaneous variations of sinus node automaticity. The measurement of the first spontaneous interval (A3-A4) after the postextrasystolic pause revealed a prolongation of 30 ms (mean value) in comparison to the basic cycle length (A1-A1) after resetting the sinus node. If the stimulus was elicited late in diastole without premature depolarisation of the pacemaker cells, no significant difference between A3-A4 and A1-A1 intervals could be found. These results indicate that sinus node automaticity may be influenced by the premature stimulus. Therefore, the calculation of SACT is burdened by unresolved methodological problems.     

The measurement of sinus node refractoriness in man

We recently described a method for measuring sinus node refractoriness in the rabbit heart. Atrial premature beats either may result in reset return responses or may become interpolated because of encroachment on sinus node refractoriness. In previous studies with rabbits we defined the effective refractory period of the sinus node (SNERP) as the longest premature interval that is interpolated. This study presents results on the extension of this technique to the measurement of sinus node refractoriness in man. Out of 30 patients (12 with and 18 without sinus node dysfunction), SNERP could be measured in 26 at one or more basic cycle lengths. At a basic pacing cycle length of 600 msec, SNERP ranged from 250 to 380 msec (mean 325 +/- 39) in patients without sinus node dysfunction and from 500 to 550 msec (mean 522 +/- 20) in patients with sinus node dysfunction. This clear differentiation of patients with and without sinus node dysfunction by SNERP is in contrast to various results obtained by assessing sinus node function from sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time. Thus this study suggests the possible use of the measurement of SNERP in the assessment of sinus node function in man and its possible value in identifying patients with sinus node dysfunction.