Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?

Many studies have highlighted differences in foot strike pattern comparing habitually shod runners who ran barefoot and with running shoes. Barefoot running results in a flatter foot landing and in a decreased vertical ground reaction force compared to shod running. The aim of this study was to investigate one possible parameter influencing running pattern: the midsole thickness. Fifteen participants ran overground at 3.3 m s⁻¹ barefoot and with five shoes of different midsole thickness (0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 8 mm, 16 mm) with no difference of height between rearfoot and forefoot. Impact magnitude was evaluated using transient peak of vertical ground reaction force, loading rate, tibial acceleration peak and rate. Hip, knee and ankle flexion angles were computed at touch-down and during stance phase (range of motion and maximum values). External net joint moments and stiffness for hip, knee and ankle joints were also observed as well as global leg stiffness. No significant effect of midsole thickness was observed on ground reaction force and tibial acceleration. However, the contact time increased with midsole thickness. Barefoot running compared to shod running induced ankle in plantar flexion at touch-down, higher ankle dorsiflexion and lower knee flexion during stance phase. These adjustments are suspected to explain the absence of difference on ground reaction force and tibial acceleration. This study showed that the presence of very thin footwear upper and sole was sufficient to significantly influence the running pattern.     

Tibial rotation in running: Does rearfoot adduction matter?

ObjectiveTo quantify the magnitude of global rearfoot motion, in particular, rearfoot adduction and to investigate its relationship to tibial rotation.DesignOne hundred and four participants ran barefoot on an Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) foam. Global range of motion values for the shank, rearfoot and medial metatarsal segment as well as foot motion within the transverse plane were determined using an optoelectric motion capture system. Relationships between parameters were assessed using partial correlation analysis.ResultsGlobal rearfoot adduction amounts to 6.1° (±2.7). Furthermore global rearfoot adduction and rearfoot eversion were significantly related to internal tibial rotation (partial correlation: r = 0.37, p < 0.001 and r = −0.24, p = 0.015, respectively). Furthermore, a strong relationship between rearfoot adduction and transverse within foot motion (r = −0.65, p < 0.001) was found.ConclusionNext to rearfoot eversion, rearfoot adduction may be also important to the understanding of ankle joint coupling. Controlling rearfoot adduction and transverse within foot motion may be a mechanism to control excessive tibial rotation.     

Knee adduction moment and medial knee contact force during gait in older people

External knee adduction moment has been studied as a surrogate for medial knee contact force. However, it is not known whether adduction moment is a rational measure for predicting medial knee contact force. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between knee adduction moment and medial knee contact force in older people, using musculo-skeletal simulation analysis. One hundred and twenty-two healthy older subjects participated in this study. Knee moment and medial knee contact force were calculated based on inverse dynamics analysis of normal walking. Muscle force and joint reaction force were used to determine the medial knee contact force during stance phase. The results showed that the maximum medial knee contact force was moderately correlated to the maximum knee adduction (r = 0.59) as well as the maximum extension moment (r = 0.60). The first peak of medial knee contact force had a significant strong correlation with the first peak of adduction moment and a moderate correlation with the maximum flexion moment. The second peak of medial knee contact force had a significant moderate correlation with both the second peak of adduction and the maximum extension moment. These results implied that the maximum adduction moment value could be used, to some extent, as a measure of the maximum medial knee contact force.     

Can orthoses and navicular drop affect foot motion patterns during running?

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine the influence of semi-rigid foot orthoses on forefoot–rearfoot joint coupling patterns in individuals with different navicular drop measures during heel–toe running.DesignTen trials were collected from twenty-three male subjects who ran slowly shod at 170 steps per minute (2.23 m/s) with a semi-rigid orthoses and without.MethodsForefoot–rearfoot coupling motions were assessed using a vector coding technique during four intervals across the first 50% of stance. Subjects were divided into two groups based on navicular drop measures. A three way ANOVA was performed to examine the interaction and main effects of stance interval, orthoses condition and navicular drop (p < 0.05).ResultsThere were no interaction effects among stance interval, orthoses condition, or navicular drop (p = 0.14) whereas an interaction effect of orthoses condition and stance interval was observed (p = 0.01; effect size = 0.74). Forefoot–rearfoot coupling motion in the no-orthoses condition increased from heel-strike to foot-flat phase at a rate faster than the orthoses condition (p = 0.02).ConclusionsFoot orthoses significantly decrease the forefoot–rearfoot joint coupling angle by reducing forefoot frontal plane motion relative to the rearfoot. Navicular drop measures did not influence joint coupling relationships between the forefoot and rearfoot during the first 50% of stance regardless of orthotic condition.     

Foot strike pattern in children during shod-unshod running

The purpose of this study was to determine the foot strike patterns (FSPs) and neutral support (no INV/EVE and no foot rotation) in children, as well as to determine the influence of shod/unshod conditions and sex. A total of 713 children, aged 6 to 16 years, participated in this study (Age = 10.28 ± 2.71 years, body mass index [BMI] = 19.70 ± 3.91 kg/m², 302 girls and 411 boys). A sagittal and frontal-plane video (240 Hz) was recorded using a high-speed camcorder, to record the following variables: rearfoot strike (RFS), midfoot strike (MFS), forefoot strike (FFS), inversion/eversion (INV/EVE) and foot rotation on initial contact. RFS prevalence was similar between boys and girls in both shod and unshod conditions. In the unshod condition there was a significant reduction (p < 0.001) of RFS prevalence both in boys (shod condition = 83.95% vs. 62.65% unshod condition) and in girls (shod condition = 87.85% vs. 62.70% unshod condition). No significant differences were found in INV/EVE and foot rotation between sex groups. In the unshod condition there was a significant increase (p < 0.001) of neutral support (no INV/EVE) both in boys (shod condition = 12.55% vs. 22.22% unshod condition) and in girls (shod condition = 17.9% vs. 28.15% unshod condition). In addition, in the unshod condition there is a significant reduction (p < 0.001) of neutral support (no foot rotation) both in boys (shod condition = 21.55% vs. 11.10% unshod condition) and in girls (shod condition = 21.05% vs. 11.95% unshod condition). In children, RFS prevalence is lower than adult’s population. Additionally, barefoot running reduced the prevalence of RFS and INV/EVE, however increased foot rotation.     

Biomechanical analysis of gait waveform data: exploring differences between shod and barefoot running in habitually shod runners

The aim of this study was to utilise one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping to compare differences between biomechanical and electromyographical waveforms in runners when running in barefoot or shod conditions.Fifty habitually shod runners were assessed during overground running at their current 10-km race running speed. Electromyography, kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected during these running trials. Joint kinetics were calculated using inverse dynamics. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping one sample t-test was conducted to assess differences over an entire gait cycle on the variables of interest when barefoot or shod (p < 0.05).Only sagittal plane differences were found between barefoot and shod conditions at the knee during late stance (18–23% of the gait cycle) and swing phase (74–90%); at the ankle early stance (0–6%), mid-stance (28–38%) and swing phase (81–100%). Differences in sagittal plane moments were also found at the ankle during early stance (2, 4–5%) and knee during early stance (5–11%). Condition differences were also found in vertical ground reaction force during early stance between (3–10%).An acute bout of barefoot running in habitual shod runners invokes temporal differences throughout the gait cycle. Specifically, a co-ordinative responses between the knee and ankle joint in the sagittal plane with a delay in the impact transient peak; onset of the knee extension and ankle plantarflexion moment in the shod compared to barefoot condition was found. This appears to affect the delay in knee extension and ankle plantarflexion during late stance. This study provides a glimpse into the co-ordination of the lower limb when running in differing footwear.     

Superficial plantar cutaneous sensation does not trigger barefoot running adaptations

It has long been proposed that the gait alterations associated with barefoot running are mediated by alterations in sensory feedback, yet there has been no data to support this claim. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the role of superficial plantar cutaneous feedback in barefoot and shod running.Methods10 healthy active subjects (6 male, 4 female); mass: 65.2 + 9.7 kg; age: 27 + 7.1 years participated in this study. 10 over-ground running trials were completed in each of the following conditions: barefoot (BF), shod (SHOD), anesthetized barefoot (ANEST BF) and anesthetized shod (ANEST SHOD). For the anesthetized conditions 0.1–0.3 mL of 1% lidocaine was injected into the dermal layer of the plantar foot below the metatarsal heads, lateral column and heel. 3-dimensional motion analysis and ground reaction force (GRF) data were captured as subjects ran over a 20 m runway with a force plate at 12 m. Kinematic and kinetic differences were analyzed via two-way repeated measure ANOVAs.ResultsThe differences in gait between the BF and SHOD conditions were consistent with previous research, with subjects exhibiting a significant decrease in stride length and changing from rearfoot strike when SHOD to fore/midfoot strike when BF. Additionally, BF running was associated with decreased impact peak magnitudes and peak vertical GRFs. Despite anesthetizing the plantar surface, there was no difference between the BF and ANEST BF conditions in terms of stride length, foot strike or GRFs.ConclusionSuperficial cutaneous sensory receptors are not primarily responsible for the gait changes associated with barefoot running.     

Dose–response effects of customised foot orthoses on lower limb muscle activity and plantar pressures in pronated foot type

Customised foot orthoses (FOs) featuring extrinsic rearfoot posting are commonly prescribed for individuals with a symptomatic pronated foot type. By altering the angle of the posting it is purported that a controlled dose–response effect during the stance phase of gait can be achieved, however these biomechanical changes have yet to be characterised. Customised FOs were administered to participant groups with symptomatic pronated foot types and asymptomatic normal foot types. The electromyographic (EMG) and plantar pressure effects of varying the dose were measured. Dose was varied by changing the angle of posting from 6° lateral to 10° medial in 2° steps on customised devices produced using computer aided orthoses design software. No effects due to posting level were found for EMG variables. Significant group effects were seen with customised FOs reducing above knee muscle activity in pronated foot types compared to normal foot types (biceps femoris p = 0.022; vastus lateralis p < 0.001; vastus medialis p = 0.001). Interaction effects were seen for gastrocnemius medialis and soleus. Significant linear effects of posting level were seen for plantar pressure at the lateral rearfoot (p = 0.001), midfoot (p < 0.001) and lateral forefoot (p = 0.002). A group effect was also seen for plantar pressure at the medial heel (p = 0.009). This study provides evidence that a customised FOs can provide a dose response effect for selected plantar pressure variables, but no such effect could be identified for muscle activity. Foot type may play an important role in the effect of customised orthoses on activity of muscles above the knee.     

Combined versus individual effects of a valgus knee brace and lateral wedge foot orthotic during stair use in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The aim of this study was to investigate the combined and individual biomechanical effects of a valgus knee brace and a lateral wedge foot orthotic during stair ascent and descent in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Thirty-five patients with varus alignment and medial knee OA were prescribed a custom valgus knee brace and lateral wedge foot orthotic. Knee angles and moments in the frontal and sagittal planes were determined from 3D gait analysis completed under four randomized conditions: (1) control (no knee brace or foot orthotic), (2) knee brace, (3) foot orthotic, and (4) combined knee brace and foot orthotic. Additional measures included the vertical ground reaction force, trunk lean, toe out and gait speed. During the combined use of a knee brace and foot orthotic, significant decreases in the knee adduction angle (2.17, 95%CI: 0.50-3.84, p = 0.013) and 2nd peak EKAM (0.35, 95%CI: 0.17–0.52, p < 0.001) were observed during stair descent; and significant increases in the EKFM were observed during stair ascent (0.54, 95%CI: 0.30–0.78, p < 0.001) and descent (1stpk: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.15-0.80, p = 0.005; 2ndpk: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.34–0.76, p < 0.001). Fewer gait compensations were observed between conditions during stair descent compared to ascent, except for toe out. Findings suggest greater effects on gait when both knee brace and foot orthotic are used together, resulting in a more normal gait pattern. However, whether or not a true change in knee joint load can be inferred when using these orthoses remains unclear. Further research is required to determine the clinical importance of the observed changes.     

The effect of changing mediolateral center of pressure on rearfoot eversion during treadmill running

IntroductionAtypical rearfoot eversion is an important kinematic risk factor in running-related injuries. Prominent interventions for atypical rearfoot eversion include foot orthoses, footwear, and taping, yet a running gait retraining is lacking. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the effects of changing mediolateral center of pressure (COP) on rearfoot eversion, subtalar pronation, medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA), hip kinematics and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF).MethodsFifteen healthy female runners underwent gait retraining under three conditions. Participants were instructed to run normally, on the lateral (COP lateral) and medial (COP medial) side of the foot. Foot progression angle (FPA) was controlled using real-time visual feedback. 3D measurements of rearfoot eversion, subtalar pronation, MLAA, FPA, hip kinematics, vGRF and COP were analyzed. A repeated-measures ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons was used to analyze changes in outcome between three conditions. Data were also analyzed using statistic parameter mapping.ResultsRunning on the lateral side of the foot compared to normal running and running on the medial side of the foot reduced peak rearfoot eversion (mean difference (MD) with normal 3.3°, p < 0.001, MD with COP medial 6°, p < 0.001), peak pronation (MD with normal 5°, p < 0.001, MD with COP medial 9.6°, p=<0.001), peak MLAA (MD with normal 2.3°, p < 0.001, MD with COP medial 4.1°, p < 0.001), peak hip internal rotation (MD with normal 1.8°, p < 0.001), and peak hip adduction (MD with normal running 1°, p = 0.011). Running on the medial side of the foot significantly increased peak rearfoot eversion, pronation and MLAA compared to normal running.SignificanceThis study demonstrated that COP translation along the mediolateral foot axis significantly influences rearfoot eversion, MLAA, and subtalar pronation during running. Running with either more lateral or medial COP reduced or increased peak rearfoot eversion, peak subtalar pronation, and peak MLAA, respectively, compared to normal running. These results might use as a basis to help clinicians and researchers prescribe running gait retraining by changing mediolateral COP for runners with atypical rearfoot eversion or MLAA.     

Effects of footwear on treadmill running biomechanics in preadolescent children

While recent research debates the topic of natural running in adolescents and adults, little is known about the influence of footwear on running patterns in children. The purpose of this study was to compare shod and barefoot running gait biomechanics in preadolescent children. Kinematic and ground reaction force data of 36 normally developed children aged 6–9 years were collected during running on an instrumented treadmill. Running conditions were randomized for each child in order to compare barefoot running with two different shod conditions: a cushioned and a minimalistic running shoe. Primary outcome was the ankle angle at foot strike. Secondary outcomes were knee angle, maximum and impact ground reaction forces, presence of rear-foot strike, step width, step length and cadence. Ankle angle at foot strike differed with statistical significance (p < 0.001) between conditions. Running barefoot reduced the ankle angle at foot strike by 5.97° [95% CI, 4.19; 7.75] for 8 km h⁻¹ and 6.18° [95% CI, 4.38; 7.97] for 10 km h⁻¹ compared to the cushioned shoe condition. Compared to the minimalistic shoe condition, running barefoot reduced the angle by 1.94° [95% CI, 0.19°; 3.69°] for 8 km h⁻¹ and 1.38° [95% CI, −3.14°; 0.39°] for 10 km h⁻¹. Additionally, using footwear significantly increased maximum and impact ground reaction forces, step length, step width and rate of rear-foot strike. In conclusion, preadolescent running biomechanics are influenced by footwear, especially by cushioned running shoes. Health professionals and parents should keep this in mind when considering footwear for children.     

Immediate effect of Masai Barefoot Technology shoes on knee joint moments in women with knee osteoarthritis

Footwear modification can beneficially alter knee loading in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study evaluated the effect of Masai Barefoot Technology shoes on reductions in external knee moments in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Three-dimensional motion analysis was used to examine the effect of Masai Barefoot Technology versus control shoes on the knee adduction and flexion moments in 17 women (mean age, 63.6 years) with radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis. The lateral and anterior trunk lean values, knee flexion and adduction angles, and ground reaction force were also evaluated. The influence of the original walking pattern on the changes in knee moments with Masai Barefoot Technology shoes was evaluated. The knee flexion moment in early stance was significantly reduced while walking with the Masai Barefoot Technology shoes (0.25 ± 0.14 N m/kg m) as compared with walking with control shoes (0.30 ± 0.19 N m/kg m); whereas the knee adduction moment showed no changes. Masai Barefoot Technology shoes did not increase compensatory lateral and anterior trunk lean. The degree of knee flexion moment in the original walking pattern with control shoes was correlated directly with its reduction when wearing Masai Barefoot Technology shoes by multiple linear regression analysis (adjusted R² = 0.44, P < 0.01). Masai Barefoot Technology shoes reduced the knee flexion moment during walking without increasing the compensatory trunk lean and may therefore reduce external knee loading in women with knee osteoarthritis.     

Biomechanical strategies implemented to compensate for mild leg length discrepancy during gait

Although mild leg length discrepancy is related to lower limb injuries, there is no consensus regarding its effects on the biomechanics of the lower limbs during gait. Biomechanical data of 19 healthy participants were collected while they walked under different conditions as described: (1) control condition—wearing flat thick sandals; (2) short limb condition—wearing a flat thick sandal on the left and a flat thin sandal on the right foot; (3) long limb condition: wearing flat thin sandal on the left and flat thick sandal on the right foot. The thick and thin sandals had 1.45 cm of mean thickness difference. The right lower limb data were analyzed for all conditions. Ankle, knee, hip and pelvis kinematics and internal moments were measured with a motion capture system and six force platforms. Principal component analysis was used to compare differences between conditions. The scores of the principal components were compared between conditions using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Twelve gait variables were different between conditions: rearfoot dorsiflexion and inversion (p < 0.001); ankle dorsiflexion and inversion moments (p < 0.001); knee flexion angle and moment (p < 0.001); knee adduction moment (p < 0.001); hip flexion angle and moment (p < 0.001); hip adduction angle (p = 0.001) and moment (p = 0.022); and pelvic ipsilateral drop (p < 0.001). Mild leg length discrepancy caused compensatory changes during gait, apparently to equalize the functional length of the lower limbs. However, these strategies did not fully succeed, since both short and long limb conditions affected pelvic motion in the frontal plane. These results suggest that mild leg length discrepancy should not be overlooked in clinical settings.     

Characteristics of clinical measurements between biomechanical responders and non-responders to a shoe designed for knee osteoarthritis

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of biomechanical and clinical measurements in relation to the knee adduction moment when wearing a standard shoe and a shoe design for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (Flex-OA).MethodsKinematic and kinetic data were collected from thirty-two healthy individuals (64 knees) using a ten camera motion analysis system and four force plates. Subjects performed 5 walking trials under the two conditions and the magnitude of individuals’ biomechanical responses where explored in relation to the clinical assessment of the Foot Posture Index, hip rotation range, strength of hip rotators, and active ankle-foot motion, all of which have been described as possible compensation mechanisms in knee osteoarthritis.ResultsSignificant reductions in the first peak of the knee adduction moment (KAM) during stance phase (9.3%) were recorded (p < 0.0001). However, despite this difference, 22 of 64 knees showed either no change or an increased KAM, indicating a non-response or negative-response to the Flex-OA shoe. Significant differences were observed between the responder and non-responder subgroups in the hip rotation range ratio (p = 0.044) and the hip rotators strength ratio (p = 0.028).ConclusionSignificant differences were seen in clinical assessments of hip rotation range and hip rotator strength between responders and non-responders using a cut-off of 0.02 Nm/kg change in the KAM.     

Effect of gait retraining for reducing ambulatory knee load on trunk biomechanics and trunk muscle activity

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that walking with increased medio-lateral trunk sway is associated with lower external knee adduction moment and lower extremity muscle activation, and higher external ipsilateral trunk moment and trunk muscle activity than walking with normal trunk sway in healthy participants. Fifteen participants performed walking trials with normal and increased medio-lateral trunk sway. Maximum trunk sway, first maximum knee adduction moment, lateral trunk bending moment, and bilateral vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, gluteus medius, rectus abdominis, external oblique and erector spinae muscle activity were computed. Walking with increased trunk sway was associated with lower maximum knee adduction moment (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.62 Nm/kg vs. 0.62–0.76 Nm/kg; P < .001) and ipsilateral gluteus medius (−17%; P = .014) and erector spinae muscle activity (−24%; P = .004) and greater maximum lateral trunk bending moment (+34%; P < .001) and contralateral external oblique muscle activity (+60%; P = .009). In all participants, maximum knee adduction moment was negatively correlated and maximum trunk moment was positively correlated with maximum trunk sway. The results of this study suggest that walking with increased trunk sway not only reduces the external knee adduction moment but also alters and possibly increases the load on the trunk. Hence, load-altering biomechanical interventions should always be evaluated not only regarding their effects on the index joint but on other load-bearing joints such as the spine.     

Factors influencing knee adduction moment measurement: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

The external knee adduction moment has been identified as a key biomarker in biomechanics research, with associations with this variable and degenerative diseases such as knee osteoarthritis. Heterogeneity in participant characteristics and the protocols used to measure this variable may however complicate its interpretation. Previous reviews have focused on interventions or did not control for potential moderator variables in their analysis. In this meta-regression analysis, we aimed to determine the influence of factors including the cohort type, footwear, and walking speed on the measurement of knee adduction moment. We performed a systematic review of the literature, identifying articles that used the Plug-in-Gait inverse dynamics model to calculate the knee adduction moment during level walking, and used a mixed effect model to determine the effect of the previously described factors on the measurement. Results for 861 individuals were described in 19 articles. Walking speed had the largest influence on knee adduction moment (p < 0.001), and participants with medial knee osteoarthritis had an increased knee adduction moment (p = 0.008) compared to healthy subjects. Footwear was found to have a significant overall effect (p = 0.024). Participants tested barefoot or wearing their own shoes had lower adduction moments than those tested in footwear provided by the researchers. Overall, the moderators accounted for 60% of the heterogeneity in the results. These results support the hypothesis that an increased knee adduction moment is associated with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis, and that footwear choice can influence the results. Gait speed has the largest effect on knee adduction moment measurement and should be carefully controlled for in studies investigating this variable.     

Footwear characteristics are related to running mechanics in runners with patellofemoral pain

Running footwear is known to influence step rate, foot inclination at foot strike, average vertical loading rate (VLR) and peak patellofemoral joint (PFJ) force. However, the association between the level of minimalism of running shoes and running mechanics, especially with regards to these relevant variables for runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), has yet to be investigated. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between the level of minimalism of running shoes and habitual running kinematics and kinetics in runners with PFP. Running shoes of 69 runners with PFP (46 females, 23 males, 30.7 ± 6.4 years) were evaluated using the Minimalist Index (MI). Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during running on an instrumented treadmill. Principal component and correlation analyses were performed between the MI and its subscales and step rate, foot inclination at foot strike, average VLR, peak PFJ force and peak Achilles tendon force. Higher MI scores were moderately correlated with lower foot inclination (r = −0.410, P < 0.001) and lower peak PFJ force (r = −0.412, P < 0.001). Moderate correlations also showed that lower shoe mass is indicative of greater step rate (ρ = 0.531, P < 0.001) and lower peak PFJ force (ρ = −0.481, P < 0.001). Greater shoe flexibility was moderately associated with lower foot inclination (ρ = −0.447, P < 0.001). Results suggest that greater levels of minimalism are associated with lower inclination angle and lower peak PFJ force in runners with PFP. Thus, this population may potentially benefit from changes in running mechanics associated with the use of shoes with a higher level of minimalism.     

The influence of shoe aging on children running biomechanics

Athletic children are prone to overuse injuries, especially at the heel and knee. Since footwear is an extrinsic factor of lower limb injury risk, the aim of this study was to assess the influence of shoe aging on children running biomechanics. Fourteen children active in sports participated in a laboratory biomechanical evaluation. A new pair of shoes was provided to each participant at an inclusion visit. Four months later, the participants performed a running task and their kinematics and kinetics were assessed both with their used shoes and with a new pair of shoes identical to the first. Furthermore, mechanical cushioning properties of shoes were evaluated before and after in-vivo aging. After 4 months of use, the sole stiffness increased by 16% and the energy loss capacity decreased by 18% (p < 0.001). No ankle or knee kinematic adjustment was found at foot strike in used shoes but changes were observed later during stance. Running with used shoes produced a higher loading rate of the vertical ground reaction force (+23%, p = 0.016), suggesting higher compressive forces under the heel and placing children at risk to experience impact-related injuries. Nevertheless, the decreased peak ankle and knee power absorption in used shoes (−11%, p = 0.010 and −12%, p = 0.029, respectively) suggests a lower ankle and knee joints loading during the absorption phase that may be beneficial regarding stretch-related injuries.