心房颤动抗凝治疗进展

心房颤动是临床上最常见的心律失常,增加卒中风险。华法林抗凝效果虽已受到广泛的肯定,但同时存在出血风险、治疗窗狭窄、需要长期监测国际标准化比率以调整药量等缺点。新型口服抗凝药的应用如达比加群、利伐沙班、阿哌沙班可有效预防卒中及血栓栓塞。经皮左心耳封堵术亦可成为预防心房颤动血栓事件的有效替代治疗方式。     

Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on Apixaban

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been challenging over decades, mostly due to a number of difficulties associated with oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which have been the most effective stroke prevention treatment for a long time. The oral direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., dabigatran) and oral direct inhibitors of factor Xa (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban) have emerged recently as an alternative to VKAs for stroke prevention in AF. These drugs act rapidly, and have a predictable and stable dose-related anticoagulant effect with a few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. The novel oral anticoagulants are used in fixed doses with no need for regular laboratory monitoring of anticoagulation intensity. However, each of these drugs has distinct pharmacological properties that could influence optimal use in clinical practice. The following phase 3 randomized trials with novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for stroke prevention in AF have been completed: the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial with dabigatran, the Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct Factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trial with rivaroxaban, and the Apixaban for Reduction of Stroke and Other Thromboembolism Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial with apixaban. Moreover, the Apixaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid to prevent Strokes (AVERROES) trial included patients with AF who have failed or were unsuitable for warfarin, and compared apixaban versus aspirin for stroke prevention in AF. Overall, apixaban has two large trials for stroke prevention in AF showing benefits not only over warfarin, but also over aspirin among those patients who have failed or refused warfarin. In the ARISTOTLE trial, apixaban was superior to warfarin in the reduction of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality, with a similar reduction in the rate of ischemic stroke and better tolerability. When compared with aspirin in the AVERROES trial, apixaban was associated with more effective reduction of stroke, a similar risk of major bleeding, and better tolerability. In this review article, the authors summarize the current knowledge on novel oral anticoagulants and discuss the clinical aspects of their use for stroke prevention in AF, with particular emphasis on apixaban.     

Aspirin in stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stable vascular disease: an era of new anticoagulants

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, especially in the elderly. There are currently enough data to support the notion that anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran is far superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in AF. Aspirin is the preferred modality in patients who are either not candidates for anticoagulation, such as patients with increased risk for bleeding, low-risk patients based on the CHADS2 score or patients who have difficulty in maintaining a therapeutic international normalized ratio. There is no dispute on the recommendations regarding stroke prevention in high-risk patients (CHADS2 risk score of 2 and beyond) with AF. However, there is some controversy regarding the appropriate strategy (anticoagulation vs aspirin) for stroke prevention in low-risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0-1). Novel oral anticoagulant drugs (direct thrombin inhibitors and Factor Xa inhibitors) might further diminish the role of aspirin for stroke prevention in AF due to their superior efficacy, lack of need for monitoring of therapeutic effects and lower bleeding risk when compared with warfarin, especially in patients with stable vascular disease.     

A review of apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: insights from ARISTOTLE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, and stroke represents the most-feared complication. Consequently, AF treatment has focused on thromboprophylaxis, with warfarin as the mainstay of therapy. However, concerns over ease of use and safety have limited its use. Three novel oral anticoagulants have been approved for use in stroke prevention in AF based on randomized data: 1) dabigatran, studied in Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY); 2) rivaroxaban, studied in Rivaroxaban Once-daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF); and 3) apixaban, studied inApixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE). In this review, we focus on apixaban and discuss subgroup analyses that have been performed in the three trials comparing novel oral anticoagulants with warfarin. We conclude with recommendations regarding further investigations.     

Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation in Patients with Permanent Pacemakers: Implications for Stroke Prevention

Several large prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that anticoagulation with warfarin reduces the risk of thromboembolic stroke in high risk patients with chronic AF by approximately 70%. Large numbers of patients with permanent pacemakers have AF, and anticoagulation rates in this population have not been described. In a prospective analysis of 110 consecutive patients attending the pacemaker clinic of a large university hospital, we assessed the number of patients with AF and the proportion of these patients who were receiving anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolic stroke. Where necessary, temporary pacemaker reprogramming to low ventricular rates was utilized to facilitate the diagnosis of AF. Fifty-three of the 110 patients (48%) were diagnosed with AF, all of whom (100%) had accepted high risk factors for thromboembolic stroke. Only eight of the 53 (15%) had been anticoagulated with warfarin. Thirty-six of the 53 patients (68%) diagnosed with AF had no prior documented diagnosis of chronic AF, and the majority had no symptoms suggesting AF. A single lead II ECG was insufficient in 67 of the 110 patients (61%) to diagnose the underlying atrial rhythm; the remainder required 12-lead ECGs or temporary pacemaker reprogramming to low ventricular rates to diagnose the underlying atrial rhythm. AF is common in patients with permanent pacemakers. It is commonly asymptomatic, and anticoagulation is markedly underutilized in reducing stroke risk in these patients. Attention to the possibility of AF in paced patients should allow prompt diagnosis and allow both the initiation of anticoagulation in order to reduce thromboembolic stroke risk and consideration for cardioversion of AF to sinus rhythm.     

Dabigatran: comparison to warfarin, pathway to approval, and practical guidelines for use

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects more than 3 million Americans and is expected to reach epidemic proportions as the US population ages. The presence of AF increases lifetime stroke risk nearly 5-fold. Conventionally, patients at moderate or high risk of stroke have been prescribed antiplatelet agents or vitamin K antagonists to reduce the risk, but each has significant limitations. Accordingly, the development of new oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors [DTIs] and factor Xa inhibitors) has attracted significant interest. The DTI dabigatran etexilate was recently shown to provide superior risk reduction to warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism for patients with nonvalvular AF and recently gained US Food and Drug Administration approval for this indication. Dabigatran etexilate is the first new agent for this indication in the United States in more than 50 years. Herein, we outline the options for stroke prevention in AF in the new oral anticoagulant era. The efficacy and practical obstacles surrounding the use of warfarin are summarized. We then review the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of dabigatran-including clinically relevant pharmacokinetics. Practical issues of initiation, conversion of anticoagulant therapy, and recommendations for dabigatran use in patients at high risk of bleeding and other special populations are discussed. We conclude by proposing a role for dabigatran in the armamentarium of drugs available for the management of stroke risk in AF.     

Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Thromboembolism is the crucial cause of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, have been proven to be effective for stroke prevention in AF. Nonetheless, the use of warfarin may be limited due to increased risk of bleeding, the potential interaction with multiple foods and drugs, and the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Over the last decade anticoagulants, such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been developed and have shown superiority compared to warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF in large randomized trials. In addition, on account of the risk of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage (LAA), many nonpharmacologic approaches have been developed to reduce stroke risk in patients with AF who are not candidates for anticoagulant therapy. Surgical, epicardial, and endovascular techniques for LAA closure are being investigated currently. Both novel pharmacotherapy and nonpharmacologic approaches for stroke prevention will be detailed in this review.     

Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation(AF) is a common arrhythmia that is an important independent risk factor for stroke. The overall risk of stroke in AF patients averages about 5%/y, but with wide variation depending on the presence of coexistent thromboembolic risk factors, which include increasing age, history of hypertension, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), and diabetes. AF patients with prior stroke or TIA are at highest risk(about 12%/y). Adjusted-dose warfarin(target INR 2.0-3.0) is highly efficacious for preventing stroke in AF patients, and is safe for selected patients. Aspirin has a modest effect on reducing stroke. Warfarin is recommended for high-risk AF patients who can safely receive it. Aspirin may be indicated for those with a low stroke risk and for those who cannot receive warfarin.     

The impact of comorbidities on stroke prophylaxis strategies in atrial fibrillation patients

Arial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly occurring sustained arrhythmia in the United States and is associated with increased mortality. AF is a risk factor for ischemic stroke, and risk factors for AF include comorbid conditions such as congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, older age, hypertension, diabetes, pulmonary disease, and history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or heart failure. Risk stratification for ischemic stroke in AF patients is based on scoring a group of risk factors that allows for the appropriate tailoring of antithrombotic therapy. The vitamin K antagonists are effective at reducing ischemic stroke rates in medium-risk to high-risk patients and are therefore generally recommended for this group. However, a large proportion of these patients are not treated with vitamin K antagonists because of the potential for adverse outcomes, particularly in elderly patients. New direct thrombin inhibitors and direct Factor Xa inhibitors in development offer the possibility of simplifying treatment and management although offering similar or better efficacy and safety profiles to warfarin. In light of these potential new treatments, the importance and improvement of risk stratification methods and the resulting recommendations in thromboprophylaxis become even more paramount as they make it more likely that medium-risk to high-risk patients can be treated safely.     

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION,THROMBOEMBOLISM AND ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY

Atrial fibrillation is the commonest sustained disorder of cardiac rhythm and is associated with increased risk of stroke and thromboembolic events. Warfarin (dose-adjusted to a target INR of 2.0-3.0) has been well established to reduce this risk of stroke by 68% (95% CI 50-79%), while aspirin provides a risk reduction of 21% (95% CI 0-38%). Nevertheless, warfarin confers a risk of bleeding and the inconvenience of regular monitoring checks, while aspirin seems effective only for certain low-risk subgroups. Thus there have been strenuous efforts to improve thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, by using low-intensity anticoagulation regimens, combination antiplatelet therapy and refinement of risk stratification strategies. Attempts at using a low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin regimen have, however, been disappointing. For now, a strategy of risk stratification should be adopted to identify highest risk patients with atrial fibrillation who would benefit from anticoagulation.     

Dabigatran: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor for use in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is well known as one of the leading causes of stroke and systemic embolism. Anticoagulation therapy is recommended in all patients at moderate-to-high risk of stroke. The vitamin K antagonist warfarin has traditionally been used in these patients but presents challenges in dosing and monitoring in these patients. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA) was recently approved for use in the US for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. Clinical trials have shown it to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism when compared with warfarin (goal international normalized ratio [INR] 2–3) with a similar risk for severe bleeding. It can be given twice daily, with the dose adjusted for renal function. It does not have any dietary restrictions, has few drug interactions (except involving permeability [P]-glycoprotein [P-gp] agents), and does not require routine laboratory monitoring. Patients may experience significant dyspepsia with its use. Compared with warfarin there is increased risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and perhaps myocardial infarction. Currently, no reversal agent exists for use in situations of overdose or severe bleeding although some strategies have been suggested. Despite its high acquisition cost compared with warfarin, analysis using theoretical models has shown it to be cost-effective. Dabigatran offers a unique alternative to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF and can be beneficial in patients requiring anticoagulation therapy.     

Dabigatran etexilate for thromboembolic prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the RE-LY study and substudies with commentary

In 2010, dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was the first new oral anticoagulant to be approved for thromboembolic prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation in over 50 years. Dabigatran, unlike warfarin, has a short half-life with a rapid onset of anticoagulant effect, does not require dose adjustment or monitoring, and does not interact with food. The RE-LY trial compared two doses of dabigatran (110 and 150 mg twice daily) with adjusted dose warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 stroke risk factor. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was superior in reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism and was associated with a similar rate of major bleeding, while dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was equally effective in reducing stroke or systemic embolism and was associated with less major bleeding. Despite these favorable results, there remains disagreement regarding the optimal dose and overall safety of dabigatran in certain patient populations including the elderly and those with renal dysfunction.     

Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin as the oral anticoagulant of choice? A review of clinical data

For many years, warfarin was the only effective oral anticoagulant to prevent and treat thromboembolism. Nevertheless, its clinical use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window, extensive drug interactions, need of strict dietary control and frequent monitoring. The pharmacological response is also unpredictable and highly variable among patients. Suboptimal anticoagulation can lead to detrimental thromboembolic events or life-threatening bleeding. Direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) activity represents a new class of anticoagulant activity that was intended to replace warfarin. Ximelagatran was the first DTI shown to have similar efficacy to warfarin, but failed to replace it because of a high incidence of liver toxicity. Dabigatran etexilate is another novel DTI with a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile and fewer drug interactions compared with warfarin. Recent large-scaled, randomized studies have shown that it does not share ximelagatran's hepatotoxicity, and is as effective as conventional anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). These findings led to the approval of dabigatran etexilate for thromboprophylaxis following hip or knee replacement surgery in Europe, Canada and the United Kingdom. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning the use of dabigatran etexilate in VTE (BISTRO, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE, RE-MOBILIZE and RECOVER) and AF (PETRO and RELY). Potential problems related to dabigatran use are also discussed to examine whether it can truly replace warfarin as the gold standard.     

Personalizing oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation

For decades, warfarin has remained the standard oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Three novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been recently approved for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF: dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Better pharmacological and clinical profiles make these newcomers a preferable alternative over warfarin. Current AF guidelines do not endorse NOACs over warfarin, or one NOAC over another. Indeed, choice of the anticoagulation regimen should be personalized based on the relative efficacy and safety of different agents across subgroups stratified by thrombotic and bleeding risk, as well as on other clinical factors, including anticoagulation control on warfarin, drug interactions, compliance and need for coagulation monitoring. This review appraises i) the randomized evidence on approved NOACs versus warfarin in AF across subgroups stratified by risk factors of stroke and bleeding and by the anticoagulation level reached on warfarin; and ii) clinical factors impacting on the anticoagulation regimen selection.     

Balancing bleeding and thrombotic risk with new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) markedly increases the risk of stroke. Warfarin is highly effective for the prevention of stroke in such patients, but it is difficult to use and causes bleeding. Three new oral anticoagulants have been approved for stroke prevention in AF patients, and are at least as effective as warfarin with better bleeding profiles. These new agents have changed and simplified our approach to stroke prevention, as the threshold for initiation of oral anticoagulation is lower. All patients with AF should be risk assessed using the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, and all patients with a score of 1 or above (except women with female sex as their only risk factor on the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score) should be considered for oral anticoagulation with one of the new agents. Formal bleeding risk assessment is essential, and can be done by using the well-validated HAS-BLED score.     

Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Treatments for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events, which can be effectively prevented using oral anticoagulation (OAC) with either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. Until recently, VKAs were the only available means for OAC treatment. NOACs had similar efficacy and were safer than or as safe as warfarin with respect to reduced rates of hemorrhagic stroke or other intracranial bleeding in the respective pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of stroke prevention in non-valvular AF patients. Increasing “real-world” evidence on NOACs broadly confirms the results of the RCTs. However, individual patient characteristics including renal function, age, or prior bleeding should be taken into account when choosing the OAC with best risk–benefit profile. In patients ineligible for OACs, surgical or interventional stroke prevention strategies should be considered. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons, the left atrial appendage excision, ligation, or amputation may be the best option. Importantly, residual stumps or insufficient ligation may result in even higher stroke risk than without intervention. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, although requiring minimally invasive access, failed to demonstrate reduced ischemic stroke events compared to warfarin. In this review article, we summarize current treatment options and discuss the strengths and major limitations of the therapies for stroke risk reduction in patients with AF.     

Novel oral anticoagulants

Oral anticoagulants have been used widely for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention. The vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as warfarin, have been around for the last 65 years and its efficacy as thromboprophylaxis remained largely unchallenged, at least until recently. Nonetheless, the VKAs have significant limitations with marked inter‐ and intra‐individual variability, requiring regular monitoring and have important food and drug interactions. Thus, there is an unmet need, with the quest for alternative oral anticoagulants with stable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that do not need monitoring. The novel oral anticoagulants are in 2 broad drug classes – the oral direct thrombin inhibitors and oral factor Xa inihibitors. This review article provides an overview of the pharmacology and describes the most recent published data on clinical trials with the new oral anticoagulants, which are in the more advanced stages of clinical development.     

Stroke in atrial fibrillation: update on pathophysiology, new antithrombotic therapies, and evolution of procedures and devices

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is said to be an epidemic, affecting 1%-1.5% of the population in the developed world. The clinical significance of AF lies predominantly in a 5-fold increased risk of stroke. Strokes associated with AF are usually more severe and confer increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and poor functional outcome. Despite the advent of promising experimental therapies for selected patients with acute stroke, pharmacological primary prevention remains the best approach to reducing the burden of stroke. New antithrombotic drugs include both parenteral agents (e.g. a long-acting factor Xa inhibitor idraparinux) and oral anticoagulants, such as oral factor Xa inhibitors and direct oral thrombin inhibitors (ximelagatran, dabigatran). Ximelagatran had shown significant potential as a possible replacement to warfarin therapy, but has been withdrawn because of potential liver toxicity. Its congener dabigatran appears to have a better safety profile and has recently entered a phase III randomized clinical trial in AF. Oral factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, YM150) inhibit factor Xa directly, without antithrombin III mediation, and may prove to be more potent and safe. Selective inhibitors of specific coagulation factors involved in the initiation and propagation of the coagulation cascade (factor IXa, factor VIIa, circulating tissue factor) are at an early stage of development. Additional new agents with hypothetical, although not yet proven, anticoagulation benefits include nematode anticoagulant peptide (NAPc2), protein C derivatives, and soluble thrombomodulin. A battery of novel mechanical approaches for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke has recently been evaluated, including various models of percutaneous left atrial appendage occluders which block the connection between the left atrium and the left atrial appendage, minimally invasive surgical isolation of the left atrial appendage, and implantation of the carotid filtering devices which divert large emboli from the internal to the external carotid artery, preventing the embolic material from reaching intracranial circulation. Despite recent advances and promising new approaches, prevention of recurrent AF may be one of the best protections against AF-related stroke and may reduce the prevalence of stroke by almost 25%. Improved pharmacological and nonpharmacological rhythm control strategies for AF as well as primary prevention of AF with 'upstream' therapy and risk factor modification are likely to produce a larger effect on the reduction of stroke rates in the general population than will specific interventions.     

Novel anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is about three-times more prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease and the prevalence of AF increases with the degree of renal impairment. Clinical studies have shown increased risk of stroke, bleeding and death in patients with chronic kidney disease and AF. Despite, this increased risk, anticoagulation is underutilized due to increased bleeding risk in this population. Recently direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors have been shown to be more efficacious in stroke prevention with reduced bleeding than warfarin. As the usage of these novel anticoagulants increases it is important to understand the data available in regard to these high risk patients.