Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a risk factor for a first nonfatal myocardial infarction

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is the primary lipid parameter targeted to prevent myocardial infarction. Alternatively, non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol includes LDL cholesterol and other atherogenic particles but does not require a fasting sample. Non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol as predictors of first nonfatal myocardial infarction were compared in 303 patients and 297 controls matched for age, gender, and community within the Boston Area Health Study. Patients were white men or women aged <76 years living in the Boston area, without a history of myocardial infarction or angina pectoris, in whom symptoms of confirmed myocardial infarction began during the 24 hours before admission. After multivariate adjustment for coronary risk factors in unmatched analyses, the corresponding odds ratios (ORs) of a first nonfatal myocardial infarction for non-HDL cholesterol in the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 to 3.14), 2.07 (95% CI 1.23 to 3.49), and 2.33 (95% CI 1.39 to 3.90) (p trend <0.01). For LDL cholesterol, the ORs were 1.10 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.81), 0.87 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.46), and 1.45 (95% CI 0.90 to 2.35) (p trend = 0.16). Including HDL cholesterol in the model increased the ORs and strengthened the test for a trend for LDL cholesterol, whereas the ORs were decreased and the test for a trend was weakened for non-HDL cholesterol. In conclusion, given that non-HDL cholesterol accounts for LDL cholesterol plus other atherogenic particles but does not require a fasting sample, this study suggests that non-HDL cholesterol may be at least as useful as LDL cholesterol to initially screen patients for risk of a first nonfatal myocardial infarction.     

Apolipoprotein B and Non-HDL Cholesterol Better Reflect Residual Risk Than LDL Cholesterol in Statin-Treated Patients

BackgroundIn cholesterol guidelines, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remains the primary target while apolipoprotein B (apoB) and non–high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol are secondary targets.ObjectivesThis study sought to determine if elevated apoB and/or non-HDL cholesterol are superior to elevated LDL cholesterol in identifying statin-treated patients at residual risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction.MethodsIn total, 13,015 statin-treated patients from the Copenhagen General Population Study were included with 8 years median follow-up. Cox regressions among apoB, non-HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, respectively, and all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction were examined on continuous scales by restricted cubic splines and by categories of concordant and discordant values defined by medians.ResultsHigh apoB and non-HDL cholesterol were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction, whereas no such associations were found for high LDL cholesterol. Compared with concordant values below medians, discordant apoB above the median with LDL cholesterol below yielded hazard ratios of 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 1.36) for all-cause mortality and 1.49 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.92) for myocardial infarction. Corresponding values for high non-HDL cholesterol with low LDL cholesterol were 1.18 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.36) and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.35 to 2.34). In contrast, discordant high LDL cholesterol with low apoB or non-HDL cholesterol was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction. Also, discordant high apoB with low non-HDL cholesterol yielded hazard ratios of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.41) for all-cause mortality and of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.40) for myocardial infarction. Furthermore, dual discordant apoB and non-HDL cholesterol above the medians with LDL cholesterol below presented hazard ratios of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.43) for all-cause mortality and 1.82 (95% CI: 1.37 to 2.42) for myocardial infarction.ConclusionsIn statin-treated patients, elevated apoB and non-HDL cholesterol, but not LDL cholesterol, are associated with residual risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. Discordance analysis demonstrates that apoB is a more accurate marker of all-cause mortality risk in statin-treated patients than LDL cholesterol or non-HDL cholesterol, and apoB in addition is a more accurate marker of risk of myocardial infarction than LDL cholesterol.     

High plasma lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity does not predict low incidence of cardiovascular events: Possible attenuation of cardioprotection associated with high HDL cholesterol

The cholesterol esterifying enzyme, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), is crucial in high density lipoprotein (HDL) metabolism. The role of LCAT activity on incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) is unknown. We determined the association of incident CVD with plasma LCAT activity, and evaluated whether LCAT may modify the cardioprotective effect of higher HDL cholesterol. In a community-based prospective nested case-control study (PREVEND cohort), an exogenous substrate assay was used to measure plasma LCAT activity in 116 men who developed CVD (cases) and in 111 male controls. Plasma LCAT activity was 5% higher in cases (P = 0.027) in association with higher total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol and triglycerides. Age-adjusted incident CVD was increased with higher LCAT activity (continuous variable: hazard ratio (HR) 1.23; 95% CI 1.01–1.49, P = 0.037; upper quartile vs. lowest 3 quartiles: HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.07–2.39, P = 0.021). This relationship was not significant after adjustment for lipids. Compared to subjects with HDL cholesterol above the median and lower LCAT activity (lowest 3 quartiles) the age-adjusted cardiovascular risk was elevated in subjects with similarly higher HDL cholesterol and higher LCAT activity (HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.27–4.49, P = 0.007), lower HDL cholesterol and lower LCAT activity (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.64–4.49, P < 0.001) and lower HDL cholesterol and higher LCAT activity (HR 2.76; 95% CI 1.58–4.83, P < 0.001). These HRs were unchanged after non-HDL cholesterol and triglyceride adjustment. In conclusion, high plasma LCAT activity does not predict reduced CVD risk, and may attenuate cardioprotection associated with higher HDL cholesterol.     

Utility of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol versus other lipoprotein measures in detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in young adults (The Bogalusa Heart Study)

Direct comparative data on the utility of non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein (apo) B, apo A-I, ratio to total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, and ratio of apo B to apo A-I in detecting increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a validated measurement of subclinical atherosclerosis, in asymptomatic younger adults are scant. This aspect was examined in 1,203 black and white subjects (71% white, 43% men) 24 to 43 years of age. In multivariate logistic regression analysis of each lipoprotein measurement (top quartile vs lower 3 quartiles specific for age, race, and gender) for detecting increased carotid IMT (top decile vs lower 9 deciles specific for age, race, and gender), only non-HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol, and apo B emerged as significant correlates with respective odds ratios of 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 2.78), 2.02 (95% CI 1.27 to 3.19), and 2.13 (95% CI 1.38 3.29), after adjusting for body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and other lipoprotein measurements. Regarding discriminating values of different lipoprotein measurements in detecting increased carotid IMT, area (c-value) under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for each lipoprotein measurement adjusted for age, race, gender, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure indicated that the c-value for non-HDL cholesterol (0.73) was similar to those for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.76), total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (0.72), apo B/apo A-I (0.71), and HDL cholesterol (0.70), but significantly (p <0.001) higher than that for apo A-I (0.69), triglycerides (0.64), and apo B (0.64). In conclusion, non-HDL cholesterol is as good as or better than other widely recommended lipoprotein measurements in the identification of subclinical atherosclerosis in young adults.     

Low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ischemic cerebrovascular disease: the bezafibrate infarction prevention registry

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing evidence that beta-hydroxy-beta-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), the associations between blood lipid levels and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) are not clear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether blood cholesterol level and its fractions are risk factors for stroke in a large group of patients with CHD. METHODS: We followed up 11 177 patients with documented CHD who were screened for but not included in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study, a secondary prevention randomized clinical trial of lipid modification, and had no history of stroke for subsequent CVD. During a 6- to 8-year follow-up period, 941 patients were identified as having nonhemorrhagic CVD, of whom 487 had verified ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS: Increases in age-adjusted rates of both nonhemorrhagic CVD and verified ischemic stroke or TIA were identified with increasing cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, decreasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and decreasing percentage of total serum cholesterol contained in the HDL moiety. In logistic regression models, adjusting for clinical covariates, the following odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were identified for lipid values in the upper vs lower tertile for the end point of nonhemorrhagic CVD: total cholesterol, 1.43 (1.20-1.70); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 1.52 (1.27-1.81), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 0.84 (0.70-1.00); and percentage of serum cholesterol contained in HDL, 0.69 (0.58-0.83). Similar trends appeared for the end point of verified ischemic stroke or TIA. CONCLUSION: These findings clearly support the role of total cholesterol and its fractions in prediction of ischemic CVD among patients with established CHD.     

Extent to which accepted serum lipid goals are achieved in a contemporary general medical population with coronary heart disease risk equivalents

This study examined lipid levels and the use of lipid-altering drugs in a contemporary general medical population without documented coronary heart disease (CHD) but with CHD risk equivalents. On the basis of present national guidelines, the following lipid values (in milligrams per deciliter) were considered optimal for this population: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol >or=40 in men and >or=50 in women, and non-HDL cholesterol <130 if triglycerides are >or=200. Of 44,052 active patients screened, 877 with CHD risk equivalents as defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines were identified. Most patients did not meet optimal lipid targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (59%), HDL cholesterol (66%), and non-HDL cholesterol (72%). Indeed, 88% of patients did not meet >or=1 lipid goal. Statins were used in 57% of patients. In patients with low HDL cholesterol, only 4.7% were taking niacin and 4.9% fibrates. In the subgroup of patients with triglycerides >or=200 mg/dl, only 9.5% were taking fibrates and 8.2% niacin. In conclusion, the present analysis highlights the dramatic need to further improve preventive measures in a substantial proportion of high-risk patients with CHD risk equivalents.     

HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 subfractions, and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. A prospective population study in eastern Finnish men

BACKGROUND. We investigated the association of cholesterol concentrations in serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) and its subfractions HDL2 and HDL3 with the risk of acute myocardial infarction in 1,799 randomly selected men 42, 48, 54, or 60 years old. METHODS AND RESULTS. Baseline examinations in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study were done during 1984-1987. In Cox multivariate survival models adjusted for age and examination year, serum HDL cholesterol of less than 1.09 mmol/l (42 mg/dl) was associated with a 3.3-fold risk of acute myocardial infarction (95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.7-6.4), serum HDL2, cholesterol of less than 0.65 mmol/l (25 mg/dl) was associated with a 4.0-fold risk of acute myocardial infarction (95% CI, 1.9-8.3), and serum HDL3 cholesterol of less than 0.40 mmol/l (15 mg/dl) was associated with a 2.0-fold (95% CI, 1.1-4.0) risk of acute myocardial infarction. Adjustments for obesity, ischemic heart disease, other cardiovascular disease, maximal oxygen uptake, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations reduced the excess risks associated with serum HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 cholesterol in the lowest quartiles by 52%, 48%, and 41%, respectively. Additional adjustments for alcohol consumption, cigarettes smoked daily, smoking years, and leisure time energy expenditure reduced these excess risks associated with low HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 cholesterol levels by another 26%, 24% and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Our data confirm that both total HDL and HDL2 levels have inverse associations with the risk of acute myocardial infarction and may thus be protective factors in ischemic heart disease, whereas the role of HDL3 remains equivocal.     

Improved identification of patients with coronary artery disease by the use of new lipid and lipoprotein biomarkers

Increasing attention is being directed toward new lipid and lipoprotein biomarkers as risk factors for coronary artery disease, although limited information is available on the diagnostic accuracy of these new biomarkers for the identification of patients with coronary artery disease. In the present study, levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), and oxidized LDL/HDL cholesterol were determined in 431 apparently healthy men and women without clinical evidence of coronary artery disease who were matched for age and gender with 490 men and women with coronary artery disease who participated in the Second Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC-II) trial. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis by measuring the area under the curve. The diagnostic accuracies of each lipid or lipoprotein biomarker (in descending order of area under the curve) were 0.867 for oxidized LDL/HDL cholesterol (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.844 to 0.890), 0.826 for oxidized LDL (95% CI 0.800 to 0.852), 0.775 for 1/HDL cholesterol (95% CI 0.745 to 0.805), 0.764 for total/HDL cholesterol (95% CI 0.733 to 0.795), 0.631 for triglycerides (95% CI 0.594 to 0.667), 0.597 for Lp-PLA2 (95% CI 0.558 to 0.615), 0.577 for LDL cholesterol (95% CI 0.539 to 0.615), and 0.520 for total cholesterol (95% CI 0.482 to 0.537). In conclusion, these findings indicate that the ratio of oxidized LDL to HDL cholesterol was a more potent biomarker for discriminating between subjects with and without coronary artery disease than traditionally measured lipids and lipoproteins and Lp-PLA2.     

The contribution of classical risk factors to cardiovascular disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia: data in 2400 patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of classical risk factors to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). DESIGN: A retrospective, multi-centre, cohort study. Extensive data were collected by scrutinizing medical records and the use of questionnaires. Multivariate Cox regression was used to study the relationship between potential risk factors and the occurrence of CVD. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: We included 2400 FH patients from 27 Dutch lipid clinics. The diagnosis of FH was based upon the presence of a low-density lipoprotein receptor mutation or upon strict clinical criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular mortality and CVD. RESULTS: During 112.943 person-years, 782 (32.6%) patients had had at least one cardiovascular event. Male gender (RR 2.82, 95% CI 2.37-3.36), smoking (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-1.99), hypertension (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06-1.75), diabetes mellitus (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.36-3.54), low HDL-C (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.63) and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.20-1.79) proved to be independent CVD risk factors. These six risk factors explained 18.7% of the variation in the occurrence of CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels proved to be important risk factors for CVD in FH patients. In addition to the routine institution of statin therapy, controlling these factors needs special attention in the management of this disorder.     

Non-high-density lipoprotein and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and their risk predictive values in coronary heart disease

To determine if non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a more useful predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk than low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and if very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol is an independent predictor of CHD risk, data from the Framingham Heart Study (2,693 men, 3,101 women) were used for this analysis. All subjects were aged > or =30 years and free of CHD at baseline, and incident CHD was the end point (618 men, 372 women). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the risk for CHD (relative risks and 95% confidence intervals) on the basis of the joint distribution of LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol (in milligrams per deciliter), as well as LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and VLDL cholesterol as continuous variables. After multivariate adjustment, within non-HDL cholesterol level, no association was found between LDL cholesterol and the risk for CHD, whereas within LDL cholesterol levels, a strong positive and graded association between non-HDL cholesterol and risk for CHD was observed. When the analysis was repeated within triglyceride levels (<200 vs > or =200 mg/dl), the risk pattern did not change significantly. Also, VLDL cholesterol was found to be a significant predictor of CHD risk after adjusting for LDL cholesterol at triglyceride levels of > or =200 or <200 mg/dl. In conclusion, these results suggest that non-HDL cholesterol level is a stronger predictor of CHD risk than LDL cholesterol; that is, VLDL cholesterol may play a critical role in the development of CHD.     

Lipid profile and incidence of atrial fibrillation: A prospective cohort study in China

Background

The association between dyslipidemia, a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, and atrial fibrillation (AF) is not clear because of limited evidence.

Hypothesis.

Dyslipidemia may be associated with increased risk of AF in a Chinese population.

Methods

A total of 88 785 participants free from AF at baseline (2006–2007) were identified from the Kailuan Study. Fasting levels of total cholesterol (TC), low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C), and triglycerides (TG) were measured at baseline using standard procedures. The study population was stratified based on quartiles of lipid profile. Incident AF was ascertained from electrocardiograms at biennial follow‐up visits (2008–2015). The associations between incident AF and the different lipid parameters (TC, LDL‐C, HDL‐C, and TG) were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results

Over a mean follow‐up period of 7.12 years, 328 subjects developed AF. Higher TC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43‐0.84) and LDL‐C (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43‐0.83) levels were inversely associated with incident AF after multivariable adjustment. HDL‐C and TG levels showed no association with newly developed AF. The results remained consistent after exclusion of individuals with myocardial infarction or cerebral infarction, or those on lipid‐lowering therapy. Both TC/HDL‐C and LDL‐C/HDL‐C ratios were inversely associated with risk of AF (per unit increment, HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79‐0.98 and HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66‐0.91, respectively).

Conclusions

TC and LDL‐C levels were inversely associated with incident AF, whereas no significant association of AF with HDL‐C or TG levels was observed.     

Niacin and statin combination therapy for atherosclerosis regression and prevention of cardiovascular disease events: reconciling the AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial with previous surrogate endpoint trials

Despite substantial risk reductions targeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with statins, there remains significant residual risk as evidenced by incident and recurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among statin-treated patients. Observational studies have shown that low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are associated with increased CVD risk. It remains unclear whether strategies aimed at increasing HDL-C in addition to background statin therapy will further reduce risk. The AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial, which compared combined niacin/simvastatin with simvastatin alone, failed to demonstrate an incremental benefit of niacin among patients with atherosclerotic CVD and on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values <70 mg/dl, but this study had some limitations. Previously, small randomized, clinical trials of niacin plus statins showed that modest regression of carotid atherosclerosis is possible in individuals with CVD, CVD risk equivalents, or atherosclerosis. This viewpoint summarizes these imaging trials studying niacin and places them in the context of the failure of AIM-HIGH to support the HDL-C-increasing hypothesis.     

Elevated Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) Predicts Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events in Hemodialysis Patients

Summary

Background and objectives

Dialysis patients show “reverse causality” between serum cholesterol and mortality. No previous studies clearly separated the risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the risk of death or fatality after such events. We tested a hypothesis that dyslipidemia increases the risk of incident atherosclerotic CVD and that protein energy wasting (PEW) increases the risk of fatality after CVD events in hemodialysis patients.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This was an observational cohort study in 45,390 hemodialysis patients without previous history of myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral infarction (CI), or cerebral bleeding (CB) at the end of 2003, extracted from a nationwide dialysis registry in Japan. Outcome measures were new onsets of MI, CI, CB, and death in 1 year.

Results

The incidence rates of MI, CI, and CB were 1.43, 2.53, and 1.01 per 100 person-years, and death rates after these events were 0.23, 0.21, and 0.29 per 100 person-years, respectively. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, incident MI was positively associated with non-HDL cholesterol (non–HDL-C) and inversely with HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). Incident CI was positively associated with non–HDL-C, whereas CB was not significantly associated with these lipid parameters. Among the patients who had new MI, CI, and/or CB, death risk was not associated with HDL-C or non–HDL-C, but with higher age, lower body mass index, and higher C-reactive protein levels.

Conclusions

In this hemodialysis cohort, dyslipidemia was associated with increased risk of incident atherosclerotic CVD, and protein energy wasting/inflammation with increased risk of death after CVD events.     

Triglyceride as a risk factor for ischaemic heart disease in British men: effect of adjusting for measurement error

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of differential precision in the measurement of the correlated variables total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol on the estimates of the risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) associated with plasma triglyceride levels. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Caerphilly Heart Disease Study (CHDS), a prospective cohort study of 2512 middle-aged men living in the town of Caerphilly, south Wales, UK. The results from two sub-studies were used to estimate the degree of measurement imprecision (laboratory error and within-person variation) in triglycerides, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariable risk estimates for major IHD calculated from logistic regression analysis, adjusted and not adjusted for measurement imprecision. Major IHD events were defined as death from IHD, clinical non-fatal myocardial infarction or electrocardiographic myocardial infarction. RESULTS: There were 261 men with major IHD events during follow-up. In age-adjusted analyses, taking measurement imprecision into account strengthened associations with IHD for all lipid factors. The odds ratio (OR) for one S.D. increase in triglycerides, ignoring measurement imprecision, was 1.36 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.20-1.55) but 1.57 (95% CI 1.30-1.89) when taking imprecision into account. The standardised odds ratio for triglycerides adjusted for measurement imprecision and the two other lipid factors was 1.35 (95% CI 1.09-1.69). In this model, the triglyceride level showed a stronger association than total cholesterol (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.05-1.56) and HDL cholesterol (OR for one S.D. decrease 1.20; 95% CI 0.97-1.49). When adding fasting blood glucose and diastolic blood pressure, however, the effect of triglycerides was reduced and ceased to be statistically significant (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.95-1.49). This was further attenuated upon inclusion of body mass index, smoking status and history of pre-existing IHD. Total cholesterol remained a statistically significant (P < 0.05) risk factor in all models. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other cohort studies, triglyceride concentration in the CHDS shows an association with the risk of IHD which is independent of total and HDL cholesterol. This effect was pronounced after adjustment for measurement imprecision. It was reduced, however, when adjusted for other factors. While hypertriglyceridaemia may exert an influence independent of other lipid factors, insulin resistance is probably the underlying metabolic disturbance.     

Impact of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on cardiovascular outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Aims

To estimate the prospective association of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We used extensive literature searching strategies to locate prospective cohort studies that reported LDL cholesterol levels as a risk factor for cardiovascular events. We conducted meta-analytic procedures for two outcomes: incident CVD and CVD mortality.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included in this analysis with a mean follow-up range of 4.8–11 years. The pooled relative risk associated with a 1 mmol/L increase in LDL cholesterol in people with type 2 diabetes was 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.43) for incident CVD, and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.25–1.80) for CVD mortality, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that for incident CVD, the pooled relative risk was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17–1.41) for 7 studies adjusted for blood pressure and/or glucose concentration (or insulin concentration, glycated hemoglobin) and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.05–1.86) for 3 studies that did not adjust for these variables.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that LDL cholesterol was associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes, independent of other conventional risk factor.     

Achieving optimum lipid-lowering goals in patients with vascular disease

Individuals with established cardiovascular disease are at high risk for serious adverse ischemic events. Fortunately, effective control of serum cholesterol levels, especially low-density lipoprotein (LDL), can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. To achieve these benefits, the evidence-based National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines recommend an LDL goal of less than 100 mg/dL with a secondary non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) goal of less than 130 mg/dL. The more aggressive optional goals are an LDL less than 70 mg/dL and a non-HDL of less than 100 mg/dL. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) exert potent LDL-lowering as well as pleiotropic effects, and these agents have consistently reduced cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction in trials of secondary prevention. Should a statin drug alone fail to achieve the goal due to resistance or patient intolerance, combination drug therapy can be used. Combination therapy may also help achieve secondary goals for the reduction of non-HDL cholesterol levels.     

Effective use of combination lipid therapy

Despite the benefits of statin therapy, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol management remains suboptimal and many patients do not achieve their recommended target goals. The aim of combination lipid drug therapy in high-risk patients is to achieve LDL cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol goals with a minimum of serious adverse effects. Although statins are the drug of first choice, statin monotherapy may be limited by intolerance of dose escalation or failure to attain non-HDL cholesterol goals in those with mixed hyperlipidemia. Statins plus bile acid resins or ezetimibe can achieve greater than 50% reduction in LDL cholesterol, with little or no increase in adverse effects. Fibrates, niacin, and omega-3 fatty acids, when added to statins, can reduce triglycerides, increase HDL cholesterol, and reduce non-HDL cholesterol to a greater extent than statin monotherapy. The safety profile of combination lipid therapy is acceptable if the global coronary heart disease risk of the patient is high, thus producing a favorable risk to benefit ratio. Careful surveillance of hepatic transaminases, avoidance of gemfibrozil in statin-fibrate combinations, and awareness of statin-concomitant drug interactions is key to safe and efficacious use of combination lipid drug therapy.     

Association analysis of the polymorphism T1128C in the signal peptide of neuropeptide Y in a Swedish hypertensive population

OBJECTIVE: The neuropeptide Y (NPY) signal peptide polymorphism T1128C has been linked to several risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the significance of this polymorphism for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease outcome. DESIGN: In a prospective study cohort, 1032 hypertensive patients (174 myocardial infarction and 170 stroke patients and 688 matched controls) were analysed for the T1128C polymorphism in the NPY gene. METHODS: The dynamic allele specific hybridization (DASH) method was used for genotyping. Serum from the same participants was analysed for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglycerides. RESULTS: The frequency of the NPY T1128C polymorphism was 8.4% among patients with a myocardial infarction or stroke, as compared to 5.1% in the control group (P = 0.040). The difference remained significant after adjustment for the cardiovascular risk factors age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, presence of diabetes, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that the NPY T1128C polymorphism is an independent predictor for myocardial infarction and stroke in a Swedish hypertensive population.     

HDL – „Game over“?

The failure of recent clinical trials to improve cardiovascular outcome via pharmacological high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol manipulation and findings that genetically increased concentrations of HDL cholesterol in plasma do not lower the risk of myocardial infarction may question the usefulness of HDL cholesterol as a measure in clinical practice. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition was shown to raise HDL cholesterol levels but the CETP inhibitors torcetrapib and dalcetrapib have shown no clinical benefit. The broad spectrum of lipid-modifying activity of niacin, including HDL cholesterol (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides and lipoprotein (a) did not translate into improved clinical outcome in the AIM-HIGH trial and the HPS2-THRIVE trial. New pharmacological data contribute to explanations why evaluating the effects of the combination of extended release (EC) niacin with the prostaglandin D(2) receptor antagonist laropiprant in the HPS2-THRIVE trial showed no improvement in cardiovascular outcome. That HDL cholesterol is a poor metric for targeted intervention and methodological issues of the trials are parts of the current controversy. It has been established that HDL is heterogeneous and contains particles with different lipid compositions and separate anti-atherosclerotic functions. Low HDL due to genetic mutations in apoA-I, the structural protein of HDL, can be causative in syndromes with premature atherosclerosis. It is known that HDL cholesterol has a role as a marker of a high risk for dyslipoproteinemia; however, HDL function may be a preferable measure in the future. Data from ongoing outcome studies with the newer CETP inhibitors anacetrapib and evacetrapib will be crucial for the future of HDL as an important approach to decreasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.     

A population-based, cross-sectional comparison of lipid-related indexes for symptoms of atherosclerotic disease

Current lipid guidelines recommend that therapy be targeted primarily at low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and that other lipid indexes may be used as secondary or supplementary targets. Emerging data have suggested that measures such as non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein-B, or the total/HDL cholesterol ratio may be more predictive of cardiovascular risk than LDL cholesterol. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to directly compare the strengths of the associations among various lipid-related indexes and clinical features consistent with atherosclerotic disease. From approximately 9,500 data sets in the overall analysis, the apolipoprotein-B/HDL cholesterol ratio emerged as the strongest correlate (odds ratio 1.177 per 1 mg/dl increment, 95% confidence interval 1.063 to 1.302, p <0.01), followed by the total or non-HDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio (odds ratio for each 1.070 per 1 mg/dl increment, 95% confidence interval 1.024 to 1.118, p <0.01), followed by the triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio (odds ratio 1.033 per 1 mg/dl increment, 95% confidence interval 1.011 to 1.056, p <0.01). Neither LDL cholesterol nor the LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio correlated significantly. Parallel analyses comparing tertile extremes and analyses in subgroups determined by gender, age, and body mass index revealed similar findings. The LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio was only significant for lean patients. In conclusion, these observations add to the published data suggesting that LDL cholesterol may not be the best target of lipid-lowering treatment strategies.