Transmembrane signaling by GPCRs: Insight from rhodopsin and opsin structures

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as seven-transmembrane (7TM) receptors, are the largest family of membrane proteins in the human genome. As versatile signaling molecules, they mediate cellular responses to extracellular signals. Diffusible ligands like hormones and neurotransmitters bind to GPCRs to modulate GPCR activity. An extraordinary and highly specialized GPCR is the photoreceptor rhodopsin which contains the chromophore retinal as its covalently bound ligand. For receptor activation the configuration of retinal is altered by photon absorption. To date, rhodopsin is the only GPCR for which crystal structures of inactive, active and ligand-free conformations are known. Although the photochemical activation is unique to rhodopsin, many mechanistic insights from this receptor can be generalized for GPCRs.     

Domain coupling in GPCRs: the engine for induced conformational changes

Recent solved structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) provide insights into variation of the structure and molecular mechanisms of GPCR activation. In this review, we provide evidence for the emerging paradigm of domain coupling facilitated by intrinsic disorder of the ligand-free state in GPCRs. The structure-function and dynamic studies suggest that ligand-bound GPCRs exhibit multiple active conformations in initiating cellular signals. Long-range intramolecular and intermolecular interactions at distant sites on the same receptor are crucial factors that modulate signaling function of GPCRs. Positive or negative coupling between the extracellular, the transmembrane and the intracellular domains facilitates cooperativity of activating 'switches' as requirements for the functional plasticity of GPCRs. Awareness that allosteric ligands robustly affect domain coupling provides a novel mechanistic basis for rational drug development, small molecule antagonism and GPCR regulation by classical as well as nonclassical modes.     

GPCR agonist binding revealed by modeling and crystallography

Despite recent progress in structural coverage of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, high plasticity of these membrane proteins poses additional challenges for crystallographic studies of their complexes with different classes of ligands, especially agonists. The ability to predict computationally the binding of natural and clinically relevant agonists and corresponding changes in the receptor pocket, starting from inactive GPCR structures, is therefore of great interest for understanding GPCR biology and drug action. Comparison of computational models published in 2009 and 2010 with recently determined agonist-bound structures of β-adrenergic and adenosine A(2A) receptors reveals high accuracy of the predicted agonist binding poses (0.8 ? and 1.7 ? respectively) and receptor interactions. In the case of the β(2)AR, energy-based models with limited backbone flexibility have also allowed characterization of side-chain rotations and a finite backbone shift in the pocket region as determinants of full, partial or inverse agonism. Development of accurate models of agonist binding for other GPCRs will be instrumental for functional and pharmacological studies, complementing biochemical and crystallographic techniques.     

G protein-coupled receptor allosterism and complexing

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of cell-surface receptors. These receptors are natural allosteric proteins because agonist-mediated signaling by GPCRs requires a conformational change in the receptor protein transmitted between two topographically distinct binding sites, one for the agonist and another for the G protein. It is now becoming increasingly recognized, however, that the agonist-bound GPCR can also form ternary complexes with other ligands or "accessory" proteins and display altered binding and/or signaling properties in relation to the binary agonist-receptor complex. Allosteric sites on GPCRs represent novel drug targets because allosteric modulators possess a number of theoretical advantages over classic orthosteric ligands, such as a ceiling level to the allosteric effect and a potential for greater GPCR subtype-selectivity. Because of the noncompetitive nature of allosteric phenomena, the detection and quantification of such effects often relies on a combination of equilibrium binding, nonequilibrium kinetic, and functional signaling assays. This review discusses the development and properties of allosteric receptor models for GPCRs and the detection and quantification of allosteric effects. Moreover, we provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the location of possible allosteric sites on GPCRs and candidate endogenous allosteric modulators. Finally, we discuss the potential for allosteric effects arising from the formation of GPCR oligomers or GPCRs complexed with accessory cellular proteins. It is proposed that the study of allosteric phenomena will become of progressively greater import to the drug discovery process due to the advent of newer and more sensitive GPCR screening technologies.     

Ligand-directed trafficking of receptor stimulus

GPCRs are seven transmembrane-spanning receptors that convey specific extracellular stimuli to intracellular signalling. They represent the largest family of cell surface proteins that are therapeutically targeted. According to the traditional two-state model of receptor theory, GPCRs were considered as operating in equilibrium between two functional conformations, an active (R*) and inactive (R) state. Thus, it was assumed that a GPCR can exist either in an “off” or “on” conformation causing either no activation or equal activation of all its signalling pathways. Over the past several years it has become evident that this model is too simple and that GPCR signalling is far more complex. Different studies have presented a multistate model of receptor activation in which ligand-specific receptor conformations are able to differentiate between distinct signalling partners. Recent data show that beside G proteins numerous other proteins, such as β-arrestins and kinases, may interact with GPCRs and activate intracellular signalling pathways. GPCR activation may therefore involve receptor desensitization, coupling to multiple G proteins, Gα or Gβγ signalling, and pathway activation that is independent of G proteins. This latter effect leads to agonist “functional selectivity” (also called ligand-directed receptor trafficking, stimulus trafficking, biased agonism, biased signalling), and agonist intervention with functional selectivity may improve the therapy. Many commercially available drugs with beneficial efficacy also show various undesirable side effects. Further studies of biased signalling might facilitate our understanding of the side effects of current drugs and take us to new avenues to efficiently design pathway-specific medications.     

Fragment-based lead discovery on G-protein-coupled receptors

Introduction: G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form one of the largest groups of potential targets for novel medications. Low druggability of many GPCR targets and inefficient sampling of chemical space in high-throughput screening expertise however often hinder discovery of drug discovery leads for GPCRs. Fragment-based drug discovery is an alternative approach to the conventional strategy and has proven its efficiency on several enzyme targets. Based on developments in biophysical screening techniques, receptor stabilization and in vitro assays, virtual and experimental fragment screening and fragment-based lead discovery recently became applicable for GPCR targets.

Areas covered: This article provides a review of the biophysical as well as biological detection techniques suitable to study GPCRs together with their applications to screen fragment libraries and identify fragment-size ligands of cell surface receptors. The article presents several recent examples including both virtual and experimental protocols for fragment hit discovery and early hit to lead progress.

Expert opinion: With the recent progress in biophysical detection techniques, the advantages of fragment-based drug discovery could be exploited for GPCR targets. Structural information on GPCRs will be more abundantly available for early stages of drug discovery projects, providing information on the binding process and efficiently supporting the progression of fragment hit to lead. In silico approaches in combination with biological assays can be used to address structurally challenging GPCRs and confirm biological relevance of interaction early in the drug discovery project.     

Diversity and modularity of G protein-coupled receptor structures

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the most 'prolific' family of cell membrane proteins, which share a general mechanism of signal transduction, but greatly vary in ligand recognition and function. Crystal structures are now available for rhodopsin, adrenergic, and adenosine receptors in both inactive and activated forms, as well as for chemokine, dopamine, and histamine receptors in inactive conformations. Here we review common structural features, outline the scope of structural diversity of GPCRs at different levels of homology, and briefly discuss the impact of the structures on drug discovery. Given the current set of GPCR crystal structures, a distinct modularity is now being observed between the extracellular (ligand-binding) and intracellular (signaling) regions. The rapidly expanding repertoire of GPCR structures provides a solid framework for experimental and molecular modeling studies, and helps to chart a roadmap for comprehensive structural coverage of the whole superfamily and an understanding of GPCR biological and therapeutic mechanisms.     

Conformational changes in G-protein-coupled receptors-the quest for functionally selective conformations is open

The G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one the largest families of drug targets. Upon agonist binding a receptor undergoes conformational rearrangements that lead to a novel protein conformation which in turn can interact with effector proteins. During the last decade significant progress has been made to prove that different conformational changes occur. Today it is mostly accepted that individual ligands can induce different receptor conformations. However, the nature or molecular identity of the different conformations is still ill-known. Knowledge of the potential functionally selective conformations will help to develop drugs that select specific conformations of a given GPCR which couple to specific signalling pathways and may, ultimately, lead to reduced side effects. In this review we will summarize recent progress in biophysical approaches that have led to the current understanding of conformational changes that occur during GPCR activation.     

Structural insights into RAMP modification of secretin family G protein-coupled receptors: implications for drug development

Secretin family G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important therapeutic targets for migraine, diabetes, bone disorders, inflammatory disorders and cardiovascular disease. They possess a large N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) known to be the primary ligand-binding determinant. Structural determination of several secretin family GPCR ECDs in complex with peptide ligands has been achieved recently, providing insight into the molecular determinants of hormone binding. Some secretin family GPCRs associate with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs), resulting in changes to receptor pharmacology. Recently, the first crystal structure of a RAMP ECD in complex with a secretin family GPCR was solved, revealing the elegant mechanism governing receptor selectivity of small molecule antagonists of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. Here we review the structural basis of ligand binding to secretin family GPCRs, concentrating on recent progress made on the structural basis of RAMP-modified GPCR pharmacology and its implications for rational drug design.     

Constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors: cause of disease and common property of wild-type receptors

The aim of this review is to provide a systematic overview on constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a rapidly evolving area in signal transduction research. We will discuss mechanisms, pharmacological tools and methodological approaches to analyze constitutive activity. The two-state model defines constitutive activity as the ability of a GPCR to undergo agonist-independent isomerization from an inactive (R) state to an active (R*) state. While the two-state model explains basic concepts of constitutive GPCR activity and inverse agonism, there is increasing evidence for multiple active GPCR conformations with distinct biological activities. As a result of constitutive GPCR activity, basal G-protein activity increases. Until now, constitutive activity has been observed for more than 60 wild-type GPCRs from the families 1-3 and from different species including humans and commonly used laboratory animal species. Additionally, several naturally occurring and disease-causing GPCR mutants with increased constitutive activity relative to wild-type GPCRs have been identified. Alternative splicing, RNA editing, polymorphisms within a given species, species variants and coupling to specific G-proteins all modulate the constitutive activity of GPCRs, providing multiple regulatory switches to fine-tune basal cellular activities. The most important pharmacological tools to analyze constitutive activity are inverse agonists and Na(+) that stabilize the R state, and pertussis toxin that uncouples GPCRs from G(i)/G(o)-proteins. Constitutive activity is observed at low and high GPCR expression levels, in native systems and in recombinant systems, and has been reported for GPCRs coupled to G(s)-, G(i)- and G(q)-proteins. Constitutive activity of neurotransmitter GPCRs may provide a tonic support for basal neuronal activity. For the majority of GPCRs known to be constitutively active, inverse agonists have already been identified. Inverse agonists may be useful in the treatment of neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular diseases and of diseases caused by constitutively active GPCR mutants.     

Structural insights into adrenergic receptor function and pharmacology

It has been over 50years since Sir James Black developed the first beta adrenergic receptor (βAR) blocker to treat heart disease. At that time, the concept of cell surface receptors was relatively new and not widely accepted, and most of the tools currently used to characterize plasma membrane receptors had not been developed. There has been remarkable progress in receptor biology since then, including the development of radioligand binding assays, the biochemical characterization of receptors as discrete membrane proteins, and the cloning of the first G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which led to the identification of other members of the large family of GPCRs. More recently, progress in GPCR structural biology has led to insights into the three-dimensional structures of βARs in both active and inactive states. Despite all of this progress, the process of developing a drug for a particular GPCR target has become more complex, time-consuming and expensive.     

Spinal or systemic TY005, a peptidic opioid agonist/neurokinin 1 antagonist, attenuates pain with reduced tolerance

After many years of effort, recent technical breakthroughs have enabled the X-ray crystal structures of three G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (β1 and β2 adrenergic and adenosine A_2a) to be solved in addition to rhodopsin. GPCRs, like other membrane proteins, have lagged behind soluble drug targets such as kinases and proteases in the number of structures available and the level of understanding of these targets and their interaction with drugs. The availability of increasing numbers of structures of GPCRs is set to greatly increase our understanding of some of the key issues in GPCR biology. In particular, what constitutes the different receptor conformations that are involved in signalling and the molecular changes which occur upon receptor activation. How future GPCR structures might alter our views on areas such as agonist-directed signalling and allosteric regulation as well as dimerization is discussed. Knowledge of crystal structures in complex with small molecules will enable techniques in drug discovery and design, which have previously only been applied to soluble targets, to now be used for GPCR targets. These methods include structure-based drug design, virtual screening and fragment screening. This review considers how these methods have been used to address problems in drug discovery for kinase and protease targets and therefore how such methods are likely to impact GPCR drug discovery in the future.This article is part of a themed section on Molecular Pharmacology of GPCR. To view the editorial for this themed section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00695.x     

G-protein-coupled receptor oligomerization and its potential for drug discovery

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent by far the largest class of targets for modern drugs. Virtually all therapeutics that are directed towards GPCRs have been designed using assays that presume that these receptors are monomeric. The recent realization that these receptors form homo-oligomeric and hetero-oligomeric complexes has added a new dimension to rational drug design. However, this important aspect of GPCR biology remains largely unincorporated into schemes to search for new therapeutics. This review provides a synopsis of the current thinking surrounding GPCR homo-oligomerization and hetero-oligomerization and shows how new models point towards unexplored avenues in the development of new therapies.     

Agonist induction and conformational selection during activation of a G-protein-coupled receptor

Substitutions of Asn111 of the AT(1) angiotensin receptor and mutations of the corresponding amino acids in other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) cause constitutive receptor activation. Ligand binding and signalling of constitutively active mutant GPCRs are discussed and similarities and differences during the activation of amine and peptide GPCRs are identified. Studies using the AT(1) receptor suggest that conformational selection is not sufficient to explain the mechanism of receptor activation, and that agonist binding to the receptor provides energy to induce activation of the receptor. Because agonist binding also actively facilitates the conformational rearrangements leading to activation of other GPCRs we propose that agonist induction should be considered as a general mechanism of GPCR activation.     

The significance of G protein-coupled receptor crystallography for drug discovery

Crucial as molecular sensors for many vital physiological processes, seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of proteins targeted by drug discovery. Together with structures of the prototypical GPCR rhodopsin, solved structures of other liganded GPCRs promise to provide insights into the structural basis of the superfamily's biochemical functions and assist in the development of new therapeutic modalities and drugs. One of the greatest technical and theoretical challenges to elucidating and exploiting structure-function relationships in these systems is the emerging concept of GPCR conformational flexibility and its cause-effect relationship for receptor-receptor and receptor-effector interactions. Such conformational changes can be subtle and triggered by relatively small binding energy effects, leading to full or partial efficacy in the activation or inactivation of the receptor system at large. Pharmacological dogma generally dictates that these changes manifest themselves through kinetic modulation of the receptor's G protein partners. Atomic resolution information derived from increasingly available receptor structures provides an entrée to the understanding of these events and practically applying it to drug design. Supported by structure-activity relationship information arising from empirical screening, a unified structural model of GPCR activation/inactivation promises to both accelerate drug discovery in this field and improve our fundamental understanding of structure-based drug design in general. This review discusses fundamental problems that persist in drug design and GPCR structural determination.     

Optimization of adenosine 5'-carboxamide derivatives as adenosine receptor agonists using structure-based ligand design and fragment screening

Structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have a proven utility in the discovery of new antagonists and inverse agonists modulating signaling of this important family of clinical targets. Applicability of active-state GPCR structures to virtual screening and rational optimization of agonists, however, remains to be assessed. In this study of adenosine 5' derivatives, we evaluated the performance of an agonist-bound A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) structure in retrieval of known agonists and then employed the structure to screen for new fragments optimally fitting the corresponding subpocket. Biochemical and functional assays demonstrate high affinity of new derivatives that include polar heterocycles. The binding models also explain modest selectivity gain for some substituents toward the closely related A(1)AR subtype and the modified agonist efficacy of some of these ligands. The study suggests further applicability of in silico fragment screening to rational lead optimization in GPCRs.     

X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region

G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) proteins [Lundstrom KH, Chiu ML, editors. G protein-coupled receptors in drug discovery. CRC Press; 2006] are the single largest drug target, representing 25-50% of marketed drugs [Overington JP, Al-Lazikani B, Hopkins AL. How many drug targets are there? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006;5(12):993-6; Parrill AL. Crystal structures of a second G protein-coupled receptor: triumphs and implications. ChemMedChem 2008;3:1021-3]. While there are six subclasses of GPCR proteins, the hallmark of all GPCR proteins is the transmembrane-spanning region. The general architecture of this transmembrane (TM) region has been known for some time to contain seven α-helices. From a drug discovery and design perspective, structural information of the GPCRs has been sought as a tool for structure-based drug design. The advances in the past decade of technologies for structure-based design have proven to be useful in a number of areas. Invoking these approaches for GPCR targets has remained challenging. Until recently, the most closely related structures available for GPCR modeling have been those of bovine rhodopsin. While a representative of class A GPCRs, bovine rhodopsin is not a ligand-activated GPCR and is fairly distant in sequence homology to other class A GPCRs. Thus, there is a variable degree of uncertainty in the use of the rhodopsin X-ray structure as a template for homology modeling of other GPCR targets. Recent publications of X-ray structures of class A GPCRs now offer the opportunity to better understand the molecular mechanism of action at the atomic level, to deploy X-ray structures directly for their use in structure-based design, and to provide more promising templates for many other ligand-mediated GPCRs. We summarize herein some of the recent findings in this area and provide an initial perspective of the emerging opportunities, possible limitations, and remaining questions. Other aspects of the recent X-ray structures are described by Weis and Kobilka [Weis WI, Kobilka BK. Structural insights into G-protein-coupled receptor activation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008;18:734-40] and Mustafi and Palczewski [Mustafi D, Palczewski K. Topology of class A G protein-coupled receptors: insights gained from crystal structures of rhodopsins, adrenergic and adenosine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 2009;75:1-12].     

Spatiotemporal GPCR signaling illuminated by genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ligand-activated cell membrane proteins and represent the most important class of drug targets. GPCRs adopt several active conformations that stimulate different intracellular G proteins (and other transducers) and thereby modulate second messenger levels, eventually resulting in receptor-specific cell responses. It is increasingly accepted that not only the type of active signaling protein but also the duration of its stimulation and the subcellular location from where receptors signal distinctly contribute to the overall cell response. However, the molecular principles governing such spatiotemporal GPCR signaling and their role in disease are incompletely understood. Genetically encoded, fluorescent biosensors—in particular for the GPCR/cAMP signaling axis—have been pivotal to the discovery and molecular understanding of novel concepts in spatiotemporal GPCR signaling. These include GPCR priming, location bias, and receptor-associated independent cAMP nanodomains. Here, we review such technologies that we believe will illuminate the spatiotemporal organization of other GPCR signaling pathways that define the complex signaling architecture of the cell.     

G蛋白偶联受体固有活性研究进展与新药开发

G蛋白偶联受体(G-prote in-coup led receptor,GPCR)是与G蛋白有信号连接的一大类受体家族,是人体内最大的膜受体蛋白家族,是一类具有7个跨膜螺旋的跨膜蛋白受体。GPCR的结构特征和在信号传导中的重要作用决定了其可以作为很好的药物靶标。目前世界药物市场上有三分之一的小分子药物是GPCR的激活剂(agon ist)或拮抗剂(antagon ist)。以其为靶点的药物在医药产业中占据显著地位。在当今前50种最畅销的上市药物中,20%属于G蛋白受体相关药物。近来的研究发现,大多数G蛋白偶联受体具有一个很重要的特性,就是具有固有活性(Constitutive ac-tivity),即无激动剂条件受体自发的维持激活并维持下游信号传导通路的活性。固有活性涉及受体、G蛋白及下游信号通路之间的关系。该文就G蛋白偶联受体固有活性概念、研究进展、反相激动剂与固有活性研究、固有活性与新药开发4个方面,进行以下论述。     

A 1536-well cAMP assay for Gs- and Gi-coupled receptors using enzyme fragmentation complementation

Guanosine triphosphate binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large class of pharmaceutical drug targets. With the increasing popularity of functional assays for high throughput screening, there arises an increasing need for robust second messenger assays that reflect GPCR activation and are readily amenable for miniaturization. GPCRs that upon agonist stimulation modulate adenylyl cyclase activity, and, consequently, cellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels, via the G protein Gs or Gi, form a subset of therapeutic targets. While there are several cAMP assays currently available, most are not scalable for miniaturization into the 1536-well format employed for automated high throughput screening of large chemical libraries. Here, we describe a cAMP assay based on the enzyme fragmentation complementation (EFC) of beta-galactosidase. In this assay, recombinant cells expressing Gs- or Gi-coupled receptors exhibit robust and reproducible pharmacology for agonists and antagonists, as measured by cAMP levels. Furthermore, the EFC cAMP assay offers sufficient sensitivity to be used with cells expressing endogenous GPCRs. We demonstrate the miniaturization of this assay into a 1536-well format with comparable sensitivity and plate statistics to those of the 384-well assay for both Gs- and Gi-coupled receptors, and its suitability for miniaturized high throughput screening.