Long-term follow-up of patients with hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B

Background and Aim: After hepatitis B virus (HBV) e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, HBV‐DNA continues to replicate, and HBeAg‐negative patients still face the risk of liver disease progression. We investigated the predictive factors for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, antiviral drug use, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence in HBeAg‐negative patients. Methods: Age, sex, ALT, platelet counts, HBV‐DNA levels, genotype, antidiabetic drug use, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption were analyzed for a total of 244 HBV carriers who were HBeAg‐negative. Results: Of 244 HBeAg‐negative patients, 158 (64.8%) showed normal ALT levels at baseline. Multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis identified high HBV‐DNA levels and high ALT at baseline as independent risk factors for ALT elevation in the patients with normal ALT at baseline. The threshold ALT and HBV‐DNA levels were determined to be 31 IU/L and 5.3 logcopies/mL, respectively. Seventeen (7.0%) patients used antiviral drugs. Multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis identified high HBV‐DNA levels (threshold, 5.7 log copies/mL), the use of antidiabetic drugs, and daily alcohol consumption at baseline as an independent risk factor for the use of antiviral drugs in HBeAg‐negative patients. In 10 patients (4.1%), HCC was detected, and a low platelet count (threshold, 10.0 × 10⁴/mm³) was associated with the occurrence of HCC. Conclusion: This study identified predictors of future active liver disease in HBeAg‐negative patients, i.e. ALT elevation, unavoidable use of antiviral drugs, and occurrence of HCC.     

Lamivudine resistance in patients with chronic hepatitis B: role of clinical and virological factors

BACKGROUND: Lamivudine resistance is associated with long-term monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B and can lead to potentially serious clinical consequences. Scant information exists regarding the influence of hepatitis B virus variants in the development of resistance. The present study was designed to identify factors predictive of lamivudine resistance, with a particular focus on the role of precore and basal core promoter variants in the setting of hepatitis B e antigen-negative disease. METHODS: Eighty-five patients, representing four major genotypes, were followed prospectively on lamivudine therapy. Resistance was defined as an increase in viral load, with polymerase gene sequencing confirming a lamivudine resistance mutation. Median follow up was 19 months (6-54 months). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine variables independently predicting for the early onset of lamivudine resistance. RESULTS: The rate of lamivudine resistance was 6%, 31% and 51% at 12, 24 and 48 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the precore variant, high baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and persistent viremia (at 6 months) as independent predictors of the early development of lamivudine resistance, with rate ratios of 4.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-18.5), 1.22 (95%CI: 1.08-1.49), and 4.73 (95%CI: 1.49-15.0), respectively (P < 0.05). Female sex predicted early resistance (rate ratio 5.27 [95%CI: 1.23-22.5, P < 0.05]) although numbers were small (n = 12). Genotype did not influence treatment response nor time to onset of resistance. CONCLUSION: Patients with precore variant hepatitis B virus are likely to develop lamivudine resistance early and should be considered for alternate first-line monotherapy. In the future, combination antiviral therapy may limit the development of resistance.     

Clinical importance of serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels in chronic hepatitis B

Quantitative serology for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is a new candidate marker for prediction of clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of quantifying HBsAg in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. A total of 424 patients who tested positive for HBsAg and were referred to Chiba University Hospital between January 1985 and April 2008 were included in the study, and the following characteristics were analyzed: age, gender, status of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), alanine aminotransferase level (ALT), HBV DNA level, number of platelets and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Measurement of HBsAg was performed using the chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay method. The study group consisted of 239 men and 185 women, and their average age was 40.6 ± 14.0 years. HBsAg showed a positive correlation with HBV DNA level (Pearson's product moment correlation, r = 0.586, P < 0.001) and a weak inverse correlation with age (r = 0.3325, P < 0.001). A control study, matched with age and sex, was performed between two groups with and without HBeAg seroconversion during follow-up period. Compared with the age and sex-matched controls, the change in HBsAg levels per year showed a significant decrease 2 years before seroconversion (paired t-test, P < 0.05). The serial measurement of quantitative HBsAg level has the possibility of predicting the occurrence of HBeAg seroconversion.     

HBeAg阴性与阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者临床和病毒学特点分析

目的:回顾性分析HBeAg阴性和HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者在HBV DNA载量、肝功能及肝脏组织病理学方面的特点。方法:对60例CHB患者的临床资料,包括HBV DNA载量、肝功能及肝组织病理学检查结果进行回顾性分析。结果:60例患者中HBeAg阴性24例,占40.0%(24/60),平均年龄(48.3±7.7)岁;HBeAg阳性36例,占60.0%(36/60),平均年龄(27.7±9.1)岁,两者在平均年龄之间比较,差异有显著性意义(t=13.4,P<0.001)。HBeAg阴性与阳性患者的HBV DNA载量分别为(5.87±0.66)log拷贝/ml和(7.37±0.50)log拷贝/ml,两者之间比较,差异有显著性意义(t=13.6,P<0.001);ALT分别为(115.95±33.6)U/L和(172.2±84.20)U/L,两者之间比较,差异有显著性意义(t=4.81,P<0.001)。HBeAg阴性患者的肝组织炎症活动度分级(G)及纤维化分期(S)与HBeAg阳性者之间比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2值分别为2.53及1.27,P值分别为0.11及0.25)。结论:HBeAg阴性CHB患者的平均年龄高于HBeAg阳性者,HBV DNA载量及ALT值低于HBeAg阳性者,但HBeAg阴性CHB患者的肝脏组织病理学改变与HBeAg阳性者无差异。     

Clinical, biochemical, immunological and virological profiles of, and differential diagnosis between, patients with acute hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis B with acute flare

Background and Aim: In areas with high or intermediate endemicity for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, it is difficult to distinguish acute hepatitis B (AHB) from chronic hepatitis B with an acute flare (CHB‐AF) in patients whose prior history of HBV infection has been unknown. The present study aimed to screen laboratory parameters other than immunoglobulin M antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (IgM anti‐HBc) to discriminate between the two conditions. Methods: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted in patients first presenting clinically as HBV‐related acute hepatitis to sort out acute self‐limited hepatitis B (ASL‐HB). Then, clinical and laboratory profiles were compared between patients with ASL‐HB and CHB‐AF. Parameters closely associated with ASL‐HB were chosen to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values and negative predictive values for diagnosing AHB. Results: There were significant differences between patients with ASL‐HB and CHB‐AF in relation to clinical and laboratory aspects, with many outstanding differences in levels of serum HBV‐DNA, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) as well as IgM anti‐HBc. In particular, there was a greater difference between the two groups in low levels of HBeAg (ratio of the optical density of the sample to the cut‐off value [S/CO] <20) than in negativity for HBeAg (42.7% and 13.5% vs 49.3% and 45.9%). 1:10 000 IgM anti‐HBc had a sensitivity and specificity of 96.2% and 93.1%, respectively, for predicting ASL‐HB. Combining it with AFP, HBeAg or HBV‐DNA could improve diagnostic power. A combination of IgM anti‐HBc, HBV‐DNA and HBeAg had a predictive value of 98.9% and a negative predictive value of 100.0%, similar to that of a combination of IgM anti‐HBc and HBV‐DNA. Adding AFP to the combinations of IgM anti‐HBc and HBV‐DNA or HBeAg could further heighten the positive predictive value. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the combination of IgM anti‐HBc, HBV‐DNA and AFP were both 100.0%. Conclusions: (i) There are significant differences with respect to clinical, biochemical, immunological and virological aspects between ASL‐HB and CHB‐AF. (ii) Of several diagnostic combinations, IgM anti‐HBc jointing HBV‐DNA is most effective and most practicable in distinguishing ASL‐HB from CHB‐AF. (iii) A low HBeAg level is more useful than negative HBeAg in differential diagnosis between ASL‐HB and CHB‐AF. (iv) In those patients with a high level of IgM anti‐HBc, serum AFP level >10× upper reference limit could rule out a probability of ASL‐HB.     

Relationship of clinical and virological factors with hepatitis activity in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients

To investigate the factors associated with active disease among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive/hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection we studied chronic HBV infected patients who had undetectable HBeAg at the first visit. HBV DNA was determined by the cross-linking assay (NAXCOR) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Mutations in the core promoter and precore regions and viral genotypes were studied. Clinical outcome of these patients were followed and categorized as: (i) relapse (ALT > 200 IU/L or three times the previous levels); (ii) active hepatitis (elevated ALT < 200 IU/L with concomitant detectable HBV DNA); or (iii) remission. A total of eighty-five patients were followed up for 5.5 ± 1.0 years. At first visit, 31 (36.5%) patients had elevated ALT levels, 12 (14.1%) had measurable HBV DNA by the cross-linking assay and 26 (30.6%) by PCR. Sixteen (18.8%) patients had hepatitis relapse, 13 (15.3%) had active hepatitis, and 56 (65.9%) remained in remission. Core promoter and precore stop codon mutants were found in 27 and 12 patients, respectively. Eleven and 20 had genotype B and C HBV, respectively. Initial elevated ALT and detectable HBV DNA were associated with active liver disease. Patient demographics, viral mutants or genotypes failed to predict disease activity. Hence, serum ALT and HBV DNA levels offer the best prediction of natural course of HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection.     

Clinical noninvasive markers for antiviral therapy decision in chronic hepatitis B with alanine aminotransferase less than two times upper limit of normal

Liver biopsy is the reference method for antiviral therapy decision‐making in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) when alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is less than two times of upper limit of normal (<2ULN). Our aim was to explore noninvasive markers for antiviral therapy decision in CHB with ALT <2ULN. A total of 452 treatment‐naïve CHB patients with ALT < 2ULN who had undergone liver biopsy were analysed in this prospective multi‐centre study. If liver biopsy showed moderate or severe inflammation (histology activity index ≥ 5) or significant fibrosis (Ishak fibrosis score ≥ 3), antiviral treatment was recommended. We analysed data using univariate and multivariate analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Two hundred and sixty‐nine (59.5%) of 452 cases with ALT < 2ULN had moderate, severe or significant inflammation. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P = 0.03), anti‐hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti‐HBc) (P = 0.003) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (P = 0.000) were independent variables for antiviral therapy decision‐making, with area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.718, 0.703 and 0.819, respectively. Our novel AAF index, which combined AST, anti‐HBc and LSM, showed better performance with AUROC of 0.876, 0.877 and 0.876 in estimation, validation and total set. Finally, 247 (54.6%) of 452 patients could avoid liver biopsy based on AAF index. Furthermore, performances of 23 noninvasive models were unsatisfactory for antiviral therapy decision with AUROC < 0.800, which were inferior to AAF index. In conclusion, AST, anti‐HBc and LSM were related to antiviral therapy decision‐making among CHB patients with ALT < 2ULN. Thus, the novel AAF index was a more reliable noninvasive model for antiviral therapy decision‐making.     

Factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody in HIV‐positive patients: impact of compromised immunity

Summary. In regions that are hyperendemic for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, prevalence of and risk factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody (anti‐HBc) in HIV‐positive patients are less well described. HIV‐positive patients who were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti‐hepatitis B surface antibody (anti‐HBs) and anti‐HBc at designated hospitals for HIV care in Taiwan were included for analysis. HBV DNA was detected by real‐time polymerase chain reaction in patients with and without isolated anti‐HBc. Of 2351 HIV‐positive patients, 450 (19.1%) were HBsAg positive, 411 (17.5%) were anti‐HBc positive alone and 963 (41.0%) for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc. Compared with patients who were positive for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc, patients with isolated anti‐HBc were older, less likely to have anti‐hepatitis C virus antibody (anti‐HCV), had lower CD4 lymphocyte counts and higher plasma HIV RNA loads. Older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–1.043) and CD4 <100 cells/μL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.524; 95% confidence interval, 1.025–2.265) were independently associated with isolated anti‐HBc by logistic regression, while presence of anti‐HCV and injecting drug use were not. HBV DNA was detectable in 8.3% of 277 patients with isolated anti‐HBc and 14.3% of 56 patients with both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc (P = 0.160). In a country hyperendemic for HBV infection, HIV‐positive patients at older age and with CD4 <100 cells/μL were more likely to have isolated anti‐HBc, suggesting that compromised immunity plays a role in the presence of this marker.     

Icteric acute hepatitis E with no response of immunoglobulin M class anti‐hepatitis E virus antibody

A 68‐year‐old Japanese man developed icteric acute hepatitis during periodic care after undergoing gastrectomy due to early gastric cancer. The routine serological markers for hepatitis A, B and C viruses were all negative. Although the liver enzymes spontaneously recovered without any specific therapy, cholestasis was relatively prolonged and successfully treated with prednisolone. Determination of serum hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA revealed the transient infection of HEV, and both immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG class anti‐HEV antibodies were detected after the disease onset, whereas those were negative when measured 3 weeks prior to the onset. In addition, the titer of serum IgA class antibody was associated with the clinical signs of hepatitis. In contrast, no IgM class antibody was detected throughout the course. This case suggests that screening only with IgM class antibody is not sufficient to detect acute HEV infection.     

Clinical significance of antibody against hepatitis B virus core antigen in patients with hepatitis C virus‐related hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose: We investigated the unsettled issue of whether seropositivity for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc) affects characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Antibody status was determined by enzyme immunoassay in 243 patients with this cancer, and associations with clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome were analysed. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was determined by real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Results: Of 235 patients with unequivocal serologic status, 142 were seropositive and 93 were seronegative. Clinicopathologic characteristics and overall cumulative survival rates were comparable between the two groups. However, seropositivity tended to predict poor outcome for patients in Child class B or C (P=0.068), those in tumour‐nodes‐metastasis‐based stage 3 or 4 (P=0.081), those with tumours exceeding 25 mm (P=0.068), and those with a past history of clinical liver disease (P=0.088). Multivariate analysis identified serum albumin, portal vein tumour thrombosis, and tumour size as independent determinants of survival. Serum HBV DNA was below 1.7 log copies/ml in all 40 patients tested. Conclusions: Overall, the clinical features of HCV‐HCC were unaffected by seropositivity for anti‐HBc. Seropositivity tended to worsen prognosis for subgroup with poor hepatic reserve or advanced tumours.     

Clinical significance of hepatitis B e antigen level measurement during long-term lamivudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with e antigen positive

INTRODUCTION Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious public health problem worldwide and a major cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma[1]. Of the approximately 2 billion people who have been infected worldwide, more th…     

合并非酒精性脂肪性肝病的HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者临床特征和肝组织中脂联素的表达

目的：研究合并非酒精性脂肪性肝病（NAFLD）的HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎（CHB）患者临床特点及脂变对肝组织中脂联素表达的影响。方法：以组织学检查证实存在肝细胞脂肪变性的39例HBeAg阴性的CHB患者为脂变纽,同期接受肝组织学检查不伴有肝细胞脂肪变性的54例HBeAg阴性CHB患者为对照组,比较其临床特征的差异并通过多因素分析判断HBeAg阴性CHB患者合并NAFLD的有关因素。结果：单因素分析显示,脂变组男性比例、肥胖者比例、BMI、血清ALT、总胆固醇（TCh）、甘油三酯（TG）水平均高于对照组,两组比较差异有显著性意义（P=0．026,0．048,0．045,0．022,0．047和〈0．001）;多因素分析显示,男性及高血清TG水平是与对脂变有意义的影响因素,比值比OR（95％CI）分别为6．105（1．185,31．448）和17．364（3．060,98．536）,P=0．031,0．001。两组患者脂联素表达水平的差异无显著性意义;对照组患者肝脏炎症分级G1及G1以下者脂联素表达强于G2及G2以上者,P=0．026。结论：HBeAg阴性CHB合并NAFLD的发生是宿主代谢因素所致而非病毒因素影响的结果,脂联素可能是肝损伤的防护性因子。     

A higher alanine aminotransferase level correlates with earlier hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in lamivudine‐treated chronic hepatitis B patients

Background/Aims: A pretherapy serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level above five times the upper limit of normal (ULN) is known to predict hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion during lamivudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients. However, whether an even higher pretherapy serum ALT value or other viral factors could affect treatment responses remains unclear. Patients and methods: A total of 253 HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who had a pretherapy serum ALT level over five times ULN and received lamivudine for 12–18 months were retrospectively collected. Among these patients, 38% had received prior lamivudine treatment. HBeAg seroconversion was the primary endpoint of treatment. Baseline clinical and viral features were compared between responders and non‐responders at the end of treatment and 6 months post‐treatment. Results: At the end of therapy, the overall HBeAg seroconversion rate was 33.6%. For lamivudine‐naïve patients, the HBeAg seroconversion rate was 37.8%. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with pretherapy ALT levels over 10 times ULN had a significantly higher HBeAg seroconversion rate than those with a pretherapy ALT level between five and 10 times ULN at 3 months (P=0.045) and 6 months (P=0.037) of lamivudine treatment. No significant difference was found in terms of pretherapy serum ALT values, viral load and genotypes between seroconverters and non‐seroconverters. Conclusions: For lamivudine‐treated HBeAg‐positive patients with pretherapy ALT levels over five times ULN, an even higher ALT level could predict earlier HBeAg seroconversion; however, neither ALT levels nor viral factors correlate with higher response rates after 12–18 months of treatment.     

Novel hepatitis B virus surface antigen mutations associated with occult genotype B hepatitis B virus infection affect HBsAg detection

The causative factors of occult hepatitis B infection are complicated and not yet been fully elucidated. Mutations in hepatitis B virus (HBV) S gene are one of the factors may contributing to occult infection. In this study, 89 blood donors with genotype B occult HBV infection were investigated. Fifty‐seven hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive/HBV DNA‐positive blood donors served as control group for comparison. Occult HBV‐related mutations with a high incidence (P < .05) in the S gene were identified. To further verify these occult infection‐related mutations, a conservative full‐gene expression vector of HBV B genotype (pHBV1.3B) was constructed. Then, the mutant plasmids on the basis of pHBV1.3B were constructed and transfected into HepG2 cells. Extracellular as well as intracellular HBsAg was analysed by electrochemical luminescence and cellular immunohistochemistry. Ten occult infection‐related mutations (E2G, Q101R, K122R, M133T, D144E, G145R, V168A, S174N, L175S and I226S) were significantly more frequent in the occult infection group (P < .05). Five of the ten mutations (E2G, D144E, G145R, V168A and S174N) strongly decreased extracellular HBsAg level (P < .05) in the transfection system. Notably, the E2G mutation had the most significant impact on the ratio of extracellular HBsAg (3.8% vs pHBV1.3B) and intracellular HBsAg (239.3% vs pHBV1.3B) (P < .05), and the fluorescence density of E2G mutant HBsAg was significantly higher than that of pHBV1.3B (P < .0001). Hence, ten mutations were associated with genotype B occult HBV infection; E2G and V168A were novel mutations which we confirmed significantly affect HBsAg detection. E2G might cause HBsAg secretion impairment that results in intracellular accumulation and a decrease in HBsAg secretion.     

Demonstration of an association between detection of IgG antibody reactivity towards the C-terminal region of the preS1 protein of hepatitis B virus and the capacity to respond to interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis B

Background and Aim: The treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains complex, with somewhat unpredictable responses. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of the pretreatment presence of circulatory antibodies towards a synthetic peptide mimicking the amino acids 94–117 of the preS1 protein of HBV and the capacity to respond to alpha‐inteferon (IFN‐alpha) treatment. Methods: The anti preS1(94–117) antibodies were measured by a peptide‐based enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the response to INF‐alpha therapy was judged by the effect on the viral kinetics as measured by an assay based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction during the treatment and follow up. Results: We found a significant (P < 0.001) correlation between the pretreatment presence of anti preS1(94–117) antibodies and a decrease in viral levels on follow up after the end of IFN‐alpha therapy. The combined response of HBV DNA suppression (P < 0.001), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss (P < 0.0001), anti‐HBe seroconversion (P < 0.005) and AST aminotransferase normalization (P < 0.01) was also highly associated with the pretreatment presence of anti preS1(94–117) antibodies. Conclusion: The positive predictive value (PPV) of anti preS1(94–117) in determining a virological response was 83% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, indicating that in the absence of pretreatment anti preS1 reactivity virtually no patient has the capacity to respond to IFN‐alpha therapy. Our findings may help to improve the efficacy of INF‐alpha therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by guiding the selection of patients for treatment and optimizing the clinical management of the individual patient.     

Serum hepatitis B virus RNA is a predictor of HBeAg seroconversion and virological response with entecavir treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND Characteristics of alterations of serum hepatitis B virus(HBV) RNA in different chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients still cannot be fully explained. Whether HBV RNA can predict HBeAg seroconversion is still controversial.AIM To investigate whether HBV RNA can predict virological response or HBeAg seroconversion during entecavir(ETV) treatment when HBV DNA is undetectable.METHODS The present study evaluated 61 individuals who were diagnosed and treated with long-term ETV monotherapy at the Department of Infectious Diseases of Peking University First Hospital(China) from September 2006 to December 2007.Finally, 30 treatment-naive individuals were included. Serum HBV RNA were extracted from 140 μL serum samples at two time points. Then they were reverse transcribed to cDNA with the HBV-specific primer. The product was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR(RT-PCR) using TAMARA probes. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS 20.0.RESULTS Level of serum HBV RNA at baseline was 4.15 ± 0.90 log10 copies/mL. HBV RNA levels showed no significant difference between the virological response(VR)and partial VR(PVR) groups at baseline(P = 0.940). Serum HBV RNA significantly decreased among patients who achieved a VR during ETV therapy(P < 0.001). The levels of HBV RNA in both HBeAg-positive patients with seroconversion group and those with no seroconversion increased after 24 wk of treatment. Overall, HBV RNA significantly but mildly correlated to HBsAg(r =0.265, P = 0.041), and HBV RNA was not correlated to HBV DNA(r = 0.242, P =0.062). Furthermore, serum HBV RNA was an independent indicator for predicting HBeAg seroconversion and virological response. HBeAg seroconversion was more likely in CHB patients with HBV RNA levels below4.12 log10 copies/mL before treatment.CONLUSION The level of serum HBV RNA could predict HBeAg seroconversion and PVR during treatment. In the PVR group, the level of serum HBV RNA tends to be increasing.     

Prevalence and clinical features of patients with concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs: Evaluation of the hepatitis B research network cohort

The prevalence of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs in plasma of persons with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is variable and its clinical significance enigmatic. We examined the prevalence and clinical and virological features of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs in children and adults with chronic HBV infection living in North America. A total of 1462 HBsAg positive participants in the Hepatitis B Research Network paediatric and adult cohorts were included (median age 41 (range 4‐80) years, 48% female, 11% white, 13% black, 73% Asians). Only 18 (1.2%) were found to be anti‐HBs positive (≥10 mIU/mL) at initial study evaluation. Distributions of sex, race, HBV genotype and ALT were similar between participants with and without concurrent anti‐HBs. Those who were anti‐HBs positive appeared to be older (median age 50 vs 41 years, P = .06), have lower platelet counts (median 197 vs 222 × 103/mm³, P = .07) and have higher prevalence of HBeAg (44% vs 26%, P = .10). They also had lower HBsAg levels (median 2.0 vs 3.5 log₁₀ IU/mL, P = .02). Testing of follow‐up samples after a median of 4 years (range 1‐6) in 12 of the 18 participants with initial concurrent anti‐HBs showed anti‐HBs became undetectable in 6, decreased to <10 mIU/mL in 1 and remained positive in 5 participants. Two patients lost HBsAg during follow‐up. In conclusion, prevalence of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs was low at 1.2%, with anti‐HBs disappearing in some during follow‐up, in this large cohort of racially diverse children and adults with chronic HBV infection living in North America. Presence of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs did not identify a specific phenotype of chronic hepatitis B, nor did it appear to affect clinical outcomes.     

Role of quantitative hepatitis B core antibody levels in predicting significant liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or near‐normal alanine aminotransferase levels

Aim

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels are not free from significant hepatic lesions. Recently, there has been an improved understanding of the clinical significance of quantitative hepatitis B core antibody levels (qAnti‐HBc) during CHB management. In this cross‐sectional study, we evaluated the utility of qAnti‐HBc in identifying significant liver inflammation in CHB patients.

Methods

A total of 469 patients (training set, n = 363; validation set, n = 106) who underwent liver biopsy (LB) were included. The qAnti‐HBc levels were quantified and the relationship between histology and serum markers was systematically analyzed.

Results

In the training set, qAnti‐HBc levels were found to have significant diagnostic value for moderate to severe liver inflammation (≥G2) in all patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.768; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.721–0.810; P < 0.001) and in patients with normal or near‐normal ALT levels (AUROC = 0.767; 95% CI, 0.697–0.828; P < 0.001). Our novel index (AC index) for the identification of ≥G2 inflammation, which combined the qAnti‐HBc and ALT levels, significantly improved diagnostic performance (AUROC = 0.813; 95% CI, 0.768–0.852) compared to the use of ALT alone (AUROC = 0.779; 95% CI, 0.732–0.821) in all patients. In the validation set, the AC index showed an improved AUROC of 0.890 (95% CI, 0.814–0.942) and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.749–0.943) in all patients and patients with normal ALT levels, respectively.

Conclusions

The qAnti‐HBc level predicts significant liver inflammation well, even in patients with normal or near‐normal ALT levels. Compared with the conventional ALT level, the AC index is a more reliable non‐invasive biomarker for significant liver inflammation in CHB patients.