Postprandial gastric antral contractions in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a scintigraphic study

Abstract  Disturbed gastric contractility has been found in manometric studies in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), but the pathophysiological role of this abnormality is unclear. We aimed at assessing postprandial gastric antral contractions and its relationships with gastric emptying and gastro-oesophageal reflux in GORD patients. Fasted GORD patients ( n  = 13) and healthy volunteers ( n  = 13) ingested a liquid meal labelled with 72 MBq of ^99mTechnetium-phytate. Gastric images were acquired every 10 min for 2 h, for measuring gastric emptying half time. Dynamic antral scintigraphy (one frame per second), performed for 4 min at 30-min intervals, allowed estimation of both mean dominant frequency and amplitude of antral contractions. In GORD patients ( n  = 10), acidic reflux episodes occurring 2 h after the ingestion of the same test meal were determined by ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring. Gastric emptying was similar in GORD patients and controls (median; range: 82 min; 58–126 vs 80 min; 44–122 min; P  = 0.38). Frequency of antral contractions was also similar in both groups (3.1 cpm; 2.8–3.6 vs 3.2 cpm; 2.4–3.8 cpm; P  = 0.15). In GORD patients, amplitude of antral contractions was significantly higher than in controls (32.7%; 17–44% vs 23.3%; 16–43%; P  = 0.01), and correlated positively with gastric emptying time ( R _s = 0.58; P  = 0.03) and inversely with the number of reflux episodes ( R _s = −0.68; P  = 0.02). Increased amplitude of postprandial gastric antral contractions in GORD may comprise a compensatory mechanism against delayed gastric emptying and a defensive factor against acidic gastro-oesophageal reflux.     

Concomitant irritable bowel syndrome is associated with failure of step‐down on‐demand proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with gastro‐esophageal reflux disease

Background The predictors for treatment failure of on‐demand proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients are unclear. We studied the efficacy and predictors for treatment failure of step‐down on‐demand PPI therapy in patients with non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) and those with low grade erosive esophagitis. Methods Consecutive symptomatic GERD patients who had positive esophageal pH studies and complete symptom resolution with initial treatment of esomeprazole were given step‐down on‐demand esomeprazole for 26 weeks. Patients with esophagitis of Los Angeles (LA) grade C or above and recent use of PPI were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as an inadequate relief of reflux symptoms using global symptom assessment. Potential predictors of treatment failure were determined using multivariate analysis. Key Results One hundred and sixty three NERD and 102 esophagitis patients were studied. The 26‐week probability of treatment failure was 36.2% (95% CI: 23.9–46.5%) in NERD group and 20.1% (95% CI: 10.9–28.3%) in esophagitis group, respectively (P = 0.021). Irritable bowel syndrome (adjusted HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5–3.8, P = 0.01), in addition to daily reflux symptom (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.9–4.2, P = 0.001) and concomitant dyspepsia (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1–2.8, P = 0.04), were independent predictors for treatment failure. Conclusions & Inferences Compared to patients with esophagitis, NERD patients have higher failure rate of on‐demand PPI therapy. Concomitant irritable bowel syndrome, in addition to daily reflux symptom and dyspepsia, is associated with the failure of on‐demand PPI in these patients.     

Effect of mianserin on gastric sensorimotor function and gastric emptying: a randomized,placebo‐controlled,double‐blind,crossover study in healthy volunteers

Background Antidepressants such as mianserin can improve symptoms in some functional dyspeptic patients but their mechanism of action remains unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of mianserin on gastric sensorimotor function in man. Methods In this randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, crossover study 12 healthy subjects (six men) underwent a gastric barostat study and a gastric emptying breath test after 7 days pretreatment with placebo or mianserin (20 mg; p.o.). Graded isobaric and isovolumetric distentions were performed to determine gastric compliance and sensitivity. Subsequently, intrabag pressure was held constant and the volume increase after administration of a liquid meal (200 mL; 300 kcal) was studied. Breath was sampled before and after ingestion of a test meal and half‐emptying times for solids and liquids were determined from the breath samples. Mianserin was compared to placebo using t‐tests and mixed model analysis (mean ± SD). Key Results Mianserin did not affect pressures or volumes needed to induce first perception or discomfort. During isovolumetric distensions compliance was decreased after mianserin treatment (1.8 ± 0.4 vs 2.0 ± 0.3 mmHg 100 mL^?1; P < 0.05). Premeal volumes were comparable in both treatment arms (221 ± 99 vs 220 ± 88 mL), but meal‐induced relaxation during the first 30 min was significantly inhibited after mianserin treatment (F_6,40 = 2.58, P < 0.05). Mianserin did not affect either solid or liquid gastric emptying. Conclusions & Inferences Mianserin does not alter gastric emptying rate or sensitivity to gastric distension, but inhibits gastric accommodation to a meal in its early phase. These observations provide no explanation for the effects of mianserin in functional dyspeptic patients.     

Effect of low‐proof alcoholic beverages on duodenogastro‐esophageal reflux in health and GERD

Background Alcoholic beverages are known to increase acidic gastro‐esophageal reflux (GER) and the risk of esophagitis. Moreover, duodenogastro‐esophageal reflux (DGER), containing bile acids, was shown to harmfully alter the esophageal mucosa, alone and synergistically with HCl and pepsin. However, studies directly addressing potential effects of different low proof alcoholic beverages on DGER in health and disease are missing. Methods Bilitec readings for beer and white, rose, and red wine were obtained in vitro from pure and from mixtures with bile. One‐hour DGER monitoring and pH‐metry were performed in 12 healthy subjects and nine reflux patients with DGER after ingestion of a standardized liquid meal together with 300 mL of water, white wine, and in the volunteers, beer and rose wine. Key Results Bilitec measurement was found to be feasible in the presence of beer, white wine, and using a threshold of 0.25, rose wine. However, the presence of red wine resulted in extinction values above this threshold. The consumption of all investigated alcoholic beverages, especially of white wine, triggered increased acidic GER, both in healthy participants and patients with reflux disease. In contrast, no relevant DGER was found after intake of alcoholic beverages. Conclusions & Inferences Fiber‐optic bilirubin monitoring can be used for DGER monitoring in combination with alcoholic beverages, except with red wine. Low‐proof alcoholic beverages are a strong trigger of GER, but not of DGER, both in healthy subjects and patients with reflux disease.