Treatment patterns, health-related quality of life and adherence to prophylaxis among haemophilia A patients in the United States

Summary. Prophylaxis and adherence to prophylaxis are increasingly recognized as important factors for the health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) of haemophilia patients. This study aims to assess treatment practices over time, HRQOL and adherence among severe haemophilia A patients in the US. Severe haemophilia A patients or their caregivers participated in a 2009 cross‐sectional survey. HRQOL was measured using either PEDS‐QL or SF‐12; adherence was measured using the VERITAS‐Pro. Student t‐tests evaluated differences between children vs. adults and self‐infusion status. A total of 117 respondents participated in the survey, capturing data for 64 adults (mean age = 37.9 years) and 53 children (mean age = 10.5 years). Although 96% of paediatric patients were currently receiving prophylaxis, only 32 (50%) adults reported receiving prophylaxis at some point in their life. Adults who have always been on prophylaxis reported better physical functioning and physical HRQOL (both P < 0.05) than adults who had not. The paediatric group reported better adherence compared to the adult group on the total scale (38 vs. 45.8, P < 0.05). Children <12 years had higher adherence than adolescents 12–18 years old (35.5 vs. 40.8; P < 0.05). Paediatric patients infused by family members showed better adherence than paediatric self‐infusers (P < 0.05). This study showed different treatment patterns between paediatric and adult patients and how the patterns impacted HRQOL. It also provided the first standardized evaluation of adherence using the VERITAS‐Pro in a US national sample. This study enhances understanding of treatment practices and adherence for the US haemophilia population and may offer insight into where adherence can be improved.     

Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey

Frequent evaluation of haemophilia treatment is necessary to improve patient care. The 2010 Practice Patterns Survey (PPS) investigated current trends in haemophilia treatment in the United States, as reported by nurses. The aim was to document practice patterns for haemophilia A and haemophilia B Survey questionnaires were sent to nurses at haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) across the United States. Seventy-one of 126 HTCs (56%) responded to the survey. Factor dosage across treatment modalities ranged from 20 to 50 IU kg(-1) for severe haemophilia A. Dosage for severe haemophilia B was more variable (<40 to >100 IU kg(-1)). On-demand dosing regimens were inconsistent for haemophilia A and more so for haemophilia B. Rates of adherence to prescribed treatment were similar for both haemophilia types (～80%). The main barrier to adherence was identified as inconvenience. More bleeding episodes occurred in adults (16.6 bleeding episodes per year) with severe haemophilia A than in younger patients (11.3 bleeding episodes per year) before switching patients to prophylaxis. For both haemophilia types, most patients who switched from prophylaxis to on-demand treatment were aged 13-24 years; these patients also had the lowest adherence (60-71%). More paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors (53%) received prophylactic bypassing therapy than their haemophilia B counterparts (38%). Adults with severe haemophilia A faced challenges in relation to co-morbidities and long-term care. This PPS provides insights into previously unexplored aspects of haemophilia care that will serve to increase awareness and promote discussion of current issues affecting haemophilia patient care.     

Comparing bleed frequency and factor concentrate use between haemophilia A and B patients

Summary. Haemorrhagic manifestations in patients with haemophilia A and B are considered quite similar for comparable level of factor deficiency. We investigated the bleeding frequency and factor usage between HA and HB patients with comparable disease severities. We collected data on frequency of bleeds and factor concentrate utilization over 3 years, from January 2001 to December 2003. Information was gathered from home infusion logs recorded by patients or their parents, and treatment records from the Hemophilia Clinic or the Hospital Emergency Department. Data were available on 58 patients with severe HA (FVIII < 0.01 U mL^?1), 10 with moderate HA (FVIII < 0.05 U mL^?1), 15 with severe HB, and five with moderate HB who required treatment for episodic bleeds, postoperative haemostasis and for primary or secondary prophylaxis. The HA patients bled more frequently than HB patients (14.4 vs. 8.63 bleeds/patient/year), but used similar amounts of concentrate per year. HA patients underwent surgical procedures 3.2 times more frequently than HB patients to correct musculoskeletal complications. A total of 21 363 409 IU of recombinant FVIII was used by patients with HA (104 722 IU/patient/year) and 6 430 960 IU of recombinant factor IX, by patients with HB (107 182 IU/patient/year). The difference in factor concentrate usage is not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The decrease in bleed frequency in haemophilia B indicates that the conclusions from randomized trials of prophylaxis in HA may not be accurately applied to HB.     

Adherence to prophylaxis is associated with better outcomes in moderate and severe haemophilia: results of a patient survey

Severe haemophilia is associated with bleeding into joints and development of arthropathy. Prophylactic treatment with infusion of replacement clotting factor is known to prevent bleeding, preserve joint functioning and result in higher health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) than episodic treatment; however, adhering to standard prophylaxis schedules can be difficult, and little is known about the relationship between adherence to prophylactic treatment and outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between self‐reported adherence to prophylaxis and health outcomes, including HRQoL and bleeding episodes. Adults with haemophilia (n = 55) and caregivers of children with haemophilia (n = 55) in Australia, Canada, and the United States completed an online questionnaire which included measures of HRQoL (SF‐12v2 for adults and SF‐10 for caregivers of children), self‐reported bleeding episodes, and the VERITAS‐Pro measure of adherence to prophylaxis in haemophilia. Regression analysis was used to test the association between VERITAS‐Pro total score and outcomes. Poorer adherence (higher VERITAS‐Pro scores) was associated with a greater number of self‐reported bleeding episodes in the past year among adults (p < 0.01), more days of work/school missed among paediatric patients (p < 0.01), and lower physical health status scores among paediatric patients (p < 0.05). This study highlights the benefits of adherence to prophylaxis among those with severe haemophilia and provides evidence for the utility of the VERITAS‐Pro by demonstrating a relationship between adherence and outcomes.     

Trends in prescribing practices for management of haemophilia: 1999–2021

Introduction

People with haemophilia rely on specialists for their care, yet the specific dosing regimens of treatments prescribed by these specialists have not been widely studied.

Aim

The objective of this study is to describe trends in clinician prescribing practices for the management of haemophilia in the United States (US).

Methods

We administered surveys to members of the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society via paper surveys at its in-person annual symposia in 1999 and 2015, and an online survey in 2021. The surveys collected information on haemophilia treatments including factor dosing, inhibitor therapy and gene therapy.

Results

Clinicians treating haemophilia for more than 50% of their practice time have increased from 37.5% of respondents in 1999 to 46.3% in 2021. Clinicians prescribing factor concentrates at >40 units/kg for routine bleeding events increased from 0% in 1999 to 29.3% in 2021 in haemophilia A (HA) and from 22.5% to 87.8% in haemophilia B (HB). In 2021, the clinicians reported prescribing emicizumab to treat HA patients (>89.5% paediatric, >85.7% adult) with or without inhibitors at least some of the time. Approximately 78.0% of respondents reported that they expected to recommend gene therapy at least some of time.

Conclusion

These data indicate changing trends in prescribing practices among US haemophilia specialists during the past 22 years. Preference for high doses of factor (>40 units/kg) has increased during this period. Emicizumab prophylaxis has been prescribed for patients with and without HA inhibitors. Clinicians expect gene therapy to have value for some haemophilia patients.     

Current situation of regular replacement therapy (prophylaxis) for haemophilia in Japan

Summary.  We conducted a questionnaire survey of haemophilia treaters participating in the Fourth Seminar on Regular Replacement Therapy (sponsored by Baxter Bioscience, 4 March 2006) to clarify the current status (up to January 2006) of replacement therapy for haemophilia. The haemophilia treaters including medical doctor, nurse belonged to 48 institutions located in the 23 prefectures of Japan. Topics included age at the initiation of regular replacement therapy (prophylaxis), and expected future situation of patients who are currently receiving prophylaxis. Data were collected from 1267 patients with haemophilia A and 273 patients with haemophilia B who had been treated at the represented institutions. Of these haemophilia A and B patients, 23% and 16% had received a prophylactic treatment regimen respectively. A breakdown of each disease by severity demonstrated that of the patients with severe haemophilia A and B patients, 27% and 18% of patients received a prophylaxis treatment, compared to 17% and 19% of patients with moderate type, and 1% and 3% of patients with mild type respectively. Of those severe haemophilia A and B patients receiving prophylaxis, the percentage of primary prophylaxis, which means prophylaxis begins under 2 years of age, was still small for 24% and 29% respectively. However, approximately half of the patients received prophylaxis during the age of 2–14 years, which suggests that secondary prophylaxis is widely spread in the age group in Japan. Problems in introduction of prophylaxis include difficulty in peripheral venous access, a lack of understanding of the therapy by the caregiver. In addition, the fear of inhibitor development, as well as the psychological anxiety in paediatric patients, was also mentioned as barriers to initiating and continuing prophylaxis .     

Adherence to prophylaxis and bleeding outcome in haemophilia: a multicentre study

Prevention of bleeding and joint damage in severe haemophilia is dependent on adherence to prophylactic replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to prophylaxis, including associations with age, bleeding and clotting factor consumption (CFC). In three Dutch haemophilia centres, semi‐structured interviews about adherence to prophylaxis in the previous 2 weeks were conducted with patients or parents of a child with haemophilia. Patients were classified, according to pre‐specified definitions, as adherent, sub‐optimally adherent or non‐adherent based on missing, timing, and dose of infusions. Association of annual bleeding rates, mean CFC, person performing the infusion (parents verus patients) with adherence categories were analysed. Overall, 241 patients with haemophilia using prophylaxis were studied. Parents were more adherent (66%; n = 48/73) than patients (43%; n = 72/168). Sub‐optimal adherence occurred in 29% of parents and 37% of patients and was characterized by changes in timing of infusion (mostly from morning to evening), while missing <6% of infusions. Non‐adherence occurred less often: in 5% of parents and 20% of patients. Reduced adherence was associated with lower CFC, but not with joint bleeding. In conclusion, non‐adherence in haemophilia was relatively rare, yet 1/3 of patients struggled to administer prophylaxis at the appropriate time of day.     

Alloantibodies to factor VIII in haemophilia

Summary. Up to one‐third of haemophilia A patients develop factor VIII (FVIII) alloantibodies (inhibitors). The Bethesda assay detects inhibitors but is relatively insensitive. Recently, a new fluorescence‐based immunoassay (FLI) was developed for antibody detection. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of inhibitors as measured by FLI. Assays of FVIII, FVIII inhibitor by Bethesda assay with Nijmegen modification, and FVIII inhibitor by FLI were performed on adult patients with haemophilia A. Data were complete for 46 patients (median age 39), of whom 72% were severe, 7% moderate and 22% mild. The Bethesda assay was positive in only two patients (4%), while FLI was positive in 23 of 46 patients (50%), with values ranging from 0.4 to 33.7 nm (median 3.5 nm ). FLI titres exceeded 7.0 nm in 19.5% of patients, all but one of whom had severe haemophilia. FLI antibody‐positive patients were less likely to be HIV positive (30% vs. 70%, P = 0.02). The use of a prophylaxis regimen was associated with a lower incidence of antibody; only two of 23 patients with detectable antibody and none of those with antibody >7 nm were on a prophylaxis regimen, while nine of 23 patients without antibody were on prophylaxis, (P = 0.03). There was no difference in inhibitor presence in patients using recombinant versus plasma‐derived factor. Antibodies detected by FLI are frequent in patients with haemophilia A, but are less common in those who are HIV positive or are receiving regular FVIII prophylaxis.     

Secondary prophylaxis treatment versus on‐demand treatment for patients with severe haemophilia A: comparisons of cost and outcomes in Taiwan

Summary. This study compared secondary prophylaxis treatment with on‐demand treatment for severe haemophilia A in Taiwan. Fifty patients from one medical centre were evaluated over a 5‐year period. Differences in annual bleed rates and factor VIII (FVIII) utilization were assessed between patients receiving secondary prophylaxis and patients receiving FVIII concentrates on‐demand. Results were then used as inputs in a pharmacoeconomic model to predict outcomes of future haemophilia therapy strategies in Taiwan. The median annual number of total bleeding episodes was significantly lower in the 13 (26%) patients who received secondary prophylaxis than in the 37 patients who received FVIII on‐demand (7.76 vs. 31.91, P < 0.0001). The between‐group difference in median annual factor VIII utilization was statistically significant (1824.41 IU kg^?1 for the prophylaxis group and 1324.81 IU kg^?1 for the on‐demand group, P < 0.01). It was estimated that approximately $2 million (USD) per year would be added to the cost of treatment by having all severe haemophilia A patients in Taiwan receive secondary prophylaxis instead of on‐demand therapy while 12 566 bleeding will be prevented. It is recommended that National Health Insurance officials utilize these data to evaluate the benefits of enhanced treatment strategies and before making substantial policy changes to haemophilia care in Taiwan.     

The use of prophylaxis in 2663 children and adults with haemophilia: results of the 2006 Canadian national haemophilia prophylaxis survey

Summary. Prophylaxis is standard of care for boys with severe haemophilia A. Indications for prophylaxis in adulthood, non‐severe haemophilia A, haemophilia B and haemophilia with inhibitors are less well defined. This survey, conducted in 2006, aimed to describe prophylaxis use in patients of all ages and severities with haemophilia A or haemophilia B in Canada. Data on 2663 individuals (2161 haemophilia A; 502 haemophilia B), including 78 inhibitor‐positive patients, were returned by 22/25 Canadian haemophilia treatment centres. This represented 98% of the Canadian haemophilia population. Frequency of prophylaxis use, defined as infusion of factor VIII/IX concentrate at least once weekly for ≥45 weeks of the year, was highest in individuals with severe haemophilia A (69%). It was lower in individuals with severe haemophilia B (32%), moderate haemophilia A (18%) or B (5%) and mild haemophilia A (1%) or B (1%). Among individuals with severe haemophilia A, the frequency of prophylaxis use was 84% in children (≤18 years) and 55% in adults (>18 years). Thirteen per cent of inhibitor‐positive individuals were receiving prophylaxis with bypassing agents. Comparison with data obtained from a 2002 Canadian survey showed a greater use of prophylaxis in children ≤5 years of age with severe haemophilia A (73% vs. 49%). Prophylaxis is no longer confined to children with severe haemophilia A, but is used in a significant proportion of adults with severe haemophilia A and individuals with severe haemophilia B or moderate haemophilia A. Prophylaxis is being started earlier in boys with severe haemophilia A.     

Recombinant factor concentrates may increase inhibitor development: a single centre cohort study

Summary. Recent reports have raised concerns regarding potential risk factors for inhibitor development. In Israel, all haemophilia patients (n = 479) are followed by the National Hemophilia Center. Most children are neonatally exposed to factor concentrate (due to circumcision performed at the age of 8 days). The impact of early exposure and recombinant FVIII products (rFVIII) administration (approved in Israel since 1996) upon inhibitor occurrence in our cohort of haemophilia A (HA) patients was analysed. Two hundred ninety‐two consecutive paediatric cases with a first symptomatic onset of HA were enrolled and followed over a median time of 7 years [min–max: 9 months to 17 years]. Study endpoint was inhibitor development against factor VIII. In addition, the treatment regimens applied, i.e. bolus administration or ‘continuous infusion’ and the family history of inhibitor development were investigated. During the follow‐up period 31/292 children (10.6%) developed high titre inhibitors. Inhibitors occurred in 14/43 (32.5%) HA patients neonatally exposed to rFVIII, as compared to 22/249 previously treated with Plasma Derived (PD) products (8.8%). The odds ratio for inhibitor formation in rFVIII treated HA patients was 3.43 (95% CI: 1.36–8.65). Transient inhibitor evolved among 2/43 paediatric HA patients, only among those treated with rFVIII. The risk of inhibitor detection significantly increased among HA children treated by continuous infusion (P = 0.025). Our experience shows that the risk of inhibitor formation may be increased by early exposure to recombinant concentrates. The multiple variables affecting inhibitor incidence deserve further attention by larger prospective studies.     

Emicizumab treatment and monitoring in a paediatric cohort: real-world data

Real-world data on emicizumab use and monitoring in paediatric severe haemophilia A (HA) patients are scarce. We therefore sought to evaluate safety, efficacy, and laboratory monitoring of emicizumab prophylaxis in a cohort of 40 children with severe HA, including 22 non-inhibitor patients and nine infants younger than one year. Bleeding, trauma, adverse events, and surgeries were documented during a median follow-up of 45 weeks. Emicizumab levels, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values, and thrombin generation were measured before and during therapy. Twenty patients experienced zero bleeds. All bleeding was trauma-related, and bleeding risk was positively correlated with the length of emicizumab prophylaxis. Sixteen surgical interventions were performed in 12 patients, with no thrombotic complications or thrombotic microangiopathy. Prolonged aPTT values normalised after emicizumab initiation, correlating with an increase in emicizumab plasma levels. Elevation in the thrombin generation was observed following emicizumab prophylaxis, with lower values recorded in younger infants. Emicizumab prophylaxis was safe and well tolerated. As all bleedings were trauma-related, laboratory monitoring could not predict bleeding risk. Our results do not support routine thrombin generation monitoring in children treated by emicizumab, yet further studies are warranted in the context of surgical procedures.     

Prophylaxis with FEIBA in paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors

The benefits shown with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis relating to joint health and quality of life (QoL) provide the rationale for FEIBA prophylaxis in haemophilia A patients with persistent FVIII inhibitors. FEIBA has previously shown efficacy in preventing bleeds in inhibitor patients who failed to respond to, or were ineligible for immune tolerance induction (ITI). The study examined the outcome of paediatric patients undergoing long‐term FEIBA prophylaxis. A retrospective chart review included severe haemophilia A patients with persistent inhibitors aged ≤13 years at the start of FEIBA prophylaxis. Baseline characteristics captured dose, frequency of prophylaxis, history of inhibitor development, including baseline titre, historical peak titre and history of ITI. Outcome measurements included annual bleed rate before and during FEIBA prophylaxis, joint status and school days missed. Sixteen cases of FEIBA prophylaxis from two centres are presented. The mean age of subjects at prophylaxis initiation was 7.5 ± 3.6 years and median baseline inhibitor titre was 23 (range 3.1–170) BU. Prior to prophylaxis initiation, median annual joint bleeds among all patients was 4 (0–48), which dropped significantly after the first year of prophylaxis, to a median annual joint bleed rate of 1 (0–7; P = 0.0179). Subsequent years (median = 9) of prophylaxis therapy demonstrated similarly low annual joint bleed rates. There were no life‐threatening bleeds, no viral seroconversions or thrombotic events during FEIBA prophylaxis treatment. FEIBA prophylaxis was effective for preventing joint bleeds and subsequent joint damage, delaying arthropathy and improving outcomes in children with haemophilia A and inhibitors to FVIII, who failed or were ineligible for ITI.     

Short‐term low‐dose secondary prophylaxis for severe/moderate haemophilia A children is beneficial to reduce bleed and improve daily activity,but there are obstacle in its execution: a multi‐centre pilot study in China

We recently showed in a single centre trial that low‐dose secondary prophylaxis in severe/moderate haemophilia patients with arthropathy is feasible and beneficial. However, this regimen has not been validated in a multicentre setting and what obstacles are there to prophylaxis remain unclear. (i) Benefit study: to confirm the benefits of similar prophylaxis protocol in severe/moderate haemophilia A (HA) in a multicentre setting in China. (ii) Follow‐up obstacle study: to investigate obstacles in compliance to prophylaxis treatment. (i) Benefit study: severe/moderate HA children with arthropathy from 15 centres were enrolled to undergo an 8‐week on‐demand treatment, followed by 6 to 12‐week low‐dose secondary prophylaxis. Outcomes compared in the two periods include joint and severe bleeding, daily activities and factor consumption. (ii) Obstacle study: questionnaires to investigators to collect data on patient and centre factors contributing to inability to comply with prophylaxis. We enrolled 191 patients from 15 centres. Sixty‐six (34.6%) from three centres completed the prophylaxis protocol, and they had significantly decreased bleeding (78.8% haemarthrosis and 68.9% severe bleedings) and improved daily activities with no increase in factor consumption over that in the on‐demand therapy period. The remaining 125 patients from 12 centres were not compliant to the prophylaxis protocol; questionnaire data indicated that the major obstacles were inability of patients/parents to accept (41.7%) or to adhere (33.3%) to the prophylaxis protocol, mostly because of failure to understand the benefits and to accept the frequent injections. Non‐availability of a centre comprehensive care team was another important determinant. Short‐term low‐dose secondary prophylactic therapy is beneficial without increasing factors consumption for severe/moderate HA with arthropathy in a multi‐centre setting in China. Obstacles to overcome must include improvement in comprehensive care and in education to patient/parents and healthcare personnel.     

Influence of medical insurance schemes and charity assistance projects on regular prophylaxis treatment of the boys with severe haemophilia A in China

Objective

To explore the influence of medical insurance policy and charity assistance projects on the uptake and discontinuation of regular prophylaxis treatment in Chinese severe haemophilia A children.

Methodology

This retrospective study was conducted on children with severe haemophilia A, who received FVIII prophylaxis treatment at 12 haemophilia centres in China from 1 November 2007 to 31 May 2013.

Results

The average duration of prophylaxis treatment received by haemophilia children significantly increased from 16.7 weeks in 2008 to 32.8 weeks in 2012 (P < .001). The main reason for prophylaxis acceptance included dissatisfaction with previous “on‐demand” regimens, availability of improved local medical insurance policies and patient/family awareness of haemophilia. The main reason for subsequent discontinuation of prophylaxis was economic instability. The upper limit of insurance was up to RMB 150 000/y (~USD: 22 000/y) for 80.1% of the insured patients and would be sufficient to cover the continuous low‐dose prophylaxis regimen. However, for many patients the burden of out‐of‐pocket copayment cost represented a risk for poor adherence to regular prophylaxis. In about two third of the patients, the annual out‐of‐pocket copayment cost amounted to >50% of their average annual disposable income. Many patients therefore required assistance from the charity assistance projects, but nonadherence remained prevalent.

Conclusion

Medical insurance policy and charity assistance projects helped haemophilia children to accept and continue prophylaxis regimens. It was the proportion of the out‐of‐pocket copayment cost rather than the upper limit of insurance reimbursement that restricted long‐term regular low‐dose prophylaxis in China.     

Haemophilia in Spain

Summary.  . To determine the prevalence of haemophilia A and B and their complications in Spain, and to characterize the health care network providing support to haemophiliac patients. The study examines clinical and genetic characteristics, treatment options, and complications observed during the course of the disease. Cross-sectional multi-centre study. The study population were patients with HA and HB in active follow-up at any Spanish hospital by December 2006. We studied 2400 haemophiliacs, 2081 (86.7%) HA and 319 (13.3%) HB patients. Illness was severe in 32.3% of patients, moderate in 16.4%, and mild in 51.3%. Genetic screening was carried out in 32.6% of the patients. Treatment administered in 2006 consisted of coagulation factor concentrates in 60% of patients. Until December 2006, 45.8% of severely ill patients were taking prophylaxis. The mean number of bleeding episodes in 2006 was four for patients not receiving primary prophylaxis and 1.3 for those taking primary prophylaxis. Thirty percent of patients had established haemophiliac arthropathy in at least one joint; 16.8% of patients were HIV-infected and 34.8% HCV-infected. Inhibitors were detected in 10% of severe HA patients and in 6.5% of severe HB patients. Immune tolerance induction therapy was started in 34 patients. This is the first comprehensive study on the epidemiology of haemophilia in Spain. It will enable us to draw comparisons with neighbouring countries, to assess the quality of care provided to haemophiliacs in Spain, and to provide evidence-based guidance for the even provision and improvement of such care.     

Recombinant factor IX (BAX326) in previously treated paediatric patients with haemophilia B: a prospective clinical trial

A newly developed recombinant factor IX (BAX326¹) was investigated for prophylactic use in paediatric patients aged <12 years with severe (FIX level <1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1–2%) haemophilia B. The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to assess the safety, haemostatic efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of BAX326 in previously treated paediatric patients. BAX326 was administered as prophylaxis twice a week for a period of 6 months, and on demand for treatment of bleeds. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of related AEs, thrombotic events and immunologic assessments. Efficacy was evaluated by annualized bleeding rate (ABR), and by treatment response rating (excellent, good, fair, none). PK was assessed over 72 h. None of the 23 treated paediatric subjects had treatment‐related SAEs or AEs. There were no thrombotic events, inhibitory or specific binding antibodies against FIX, rFurin or CHO protein. Twenty‐six bleeds (19 non‐joint vs. 7 joint bleeds) occurred (mean ABR 2.7 ± 3.14, median 2.0), of which 23 were injury‐related. Twenty subjects (87%) did not experience any bleeds of spontaneous aetiology. Haemostatic efficacy of BAX326 was excellent or good for >96% of bleeds (100% of minor, 88.9% of moderate and 100% of major bleeds); the majority (88.5%) resolved after 1–2 infusions. Longer T_1/2 and lower IR were observed in younger children (<6 years) compared to those aged 6 to 12 years. BAX326 administered as prophylactic treatment as well as for controlling bleeds is efficacious and safe in paediatric patients aged <12 years with haemophilia B.     

Presentation and management of acute coronary syndromes among adult persons with haemophilia: results of an international,retrospective, 10‐year survey

Sparse data are available on presentation and management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including unstable angina and non‐ST‐ and ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, among persons with haemophilia (PWH). The aim of this study was to determine demographics, bleeding disorder characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs), interventions, haemostatic protocol, revascularization outcomes and complications among PWH with ACS. Members of an international consortium comprising >2000 adult PWH retrospectively completed case report forms for episodes of ACS in a >10‐year follow‐up period (2003–2013). Twenty ACS episodes occurred among 19 patients [rate, 0.8% (95% CI 0.4, 1.2)]. Seven patients (37%) were aged <50 years; 10 (53%) had ≥3 CRFs. In 5/20 episodes (25%), the initial ACS management protocol was altered because of the bleeding disorder. None of the eight patients with severe haemophilia underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), compared with 54.5% of patients with non‐severe disease (P = 0.02). Revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or CABG was rated successful in 13/13 cases, with no excessive bleeding during initial management. During chronic exposure to antiplatelet agents, secondary haemophilia prophylaxis was more prevalent in patients with severe haemophilia compared with non‐severe haemophilia (85.7% vs. 30%, P = 0.05). No ACS‐related deaths occurred during initial management, but one patient with severe haemophilia A died of undetermined cause 36 months after the ACS event while on aspirin therapy. ACS occurs even among relatively younger PWH, typically in association with multiple CRFs. Revascularization with PCI/CABG is feasible, and antiplatelet agents plus secondary prophylaxis appears to be well tolerated in selected PWH with ACS.     

Practice patterns in haemophilia A therapy – global progress towards optimal care

This paper reports the findings of a global survey of practice patterns for the management of patients with haemophilia A. A total of 147 haemophilia treatment centres worldwide responded to the questionnaire, supplying data for 16 115 patients with haemophilia A. From these responses, 38% (range: 25-48%) of patients were under 18 years old. Almost half (47%) of patients were reported to have mild or moderate haemophilia A, 48% had severe haemophilia A (no inhibitor) and 5% were inhibitor patients. Less than half of patients with severe haemophilia A received prophylactic therapy (37%, excluding inhibitor patients) and 54% received on-demand treatment; the remaining 9% were inhibitor patients. Primary prophylaxis rates for severe haemophilia ranged from 73% in Sweden to 17% in the USA. Most respondents (80%) ranked infrequent bleeds as one of the top five reasons for not administering prophylactic treatment, followed by venous access (60%) and cost (45%). Of patients with severe haemophilia (non-inhibitor), 32% on primary prophylaxis and 27% on secondary prophylaxis had indwelling catheters. Risk of infection and the patient's inability to maintain the line were the key concerns cited by nurses relating to venous access. The mean ratio of nurses to patients with haemophilia A was 1:69 and nurses felt that they were either fully (26%) or mostly (45%) autonomous in assessment and treatment decisions. Results from this current survey suggest that worldwide research should be continued so as to improve outcomes through the identification of optimal treatment protocols for the management of haemophilia A.     

Physical and mental quality of life in adult patients with haemophilia in Belgium: the impact of financial issues

In Belgium, where haemophilia affects approximately 1:7000 people (2011), data on patients' quality of life (QoL) is scarce. This project aims to assess physical and mental QoL (P‐QoL and M‐QoL) simultaneously, and to analyse the influence of different variables on these two aspects of QoL. After Ethics Committee approval, we contacted 84 adult haemophilia A (HA) and haemophilia B (HB) patients, without current inhibitors, on replacement therapy (on‐demand or secondary prophylaxis), regularly followed up at our comprehensive treatment centre. Seventy‐one (n = 59 HA, n = 12 HB) replied to our questionnaire, which included the SF36v2 QoL assessment forms. We analysed two groups of variables: one including variables previously associated with decreased QoL, and another including variables with unclear impact on QoL (e.g. patients' understanding of haemophilia‐related issues, economical concerns). In our population (mean ± SD age: 45.2 ± 14.7 years old), P‐QoL appeared more reduced than M‐QoL. P‐QoL was strongly influenced by the number of arthropathies while M‐QoL was primarily affected by patients' concern of personal costs due to haemophilia. Among this latter group, having knowledge of insurance coverage had a positive impact on M‐QoL. Scores did not depend on haemophilia type. QoL was impaired in our haemophilia patients. A simultaneous assessment of P‐QoL and M‐QoL confirmed the benefit of primary prophylaxis in P‐QoL, while originally pointing out the major burden of patients' concerns and poor understanding of haemophilia‐related economical issues on their M‐QoL. This might become a particularly challenging issue in times of financial crisis.