Antibody formation and specificity in Bethesda‐negative brother pairs with haemophilia A

Antibodies directed towards non‐neutralizing epitopes on the factor VIII protein (FVIII) may be detected in patients with haemophilia A. We evaluated the prevalence of non‐neutralizing antibodies, in 201 inhibitor‐negative brother pairs with severe haemophilia A, enrolled in the Malmö International Brother Study and the Haemophilia Inhibitor Genetics Study. To evaluate binding specificity of the antibodies, ELISA plates were coated with two recombinant full‐length (FL) FVIII‐products and one recombinant B‐domain‐deleted (BDD) product. Seventy‐nine patients (39.3%) had a history of positive inhibitor titre measured by Bethesda assay, and FVIII antibodies were detected in 20 of them (25.3%). Additional 23 samples from subjects without a history of FVIII inhibitors were ELISA‐positive corresponding to a frequency of non‐neutralizing antibodies of 18.9%. The antibody response towards the different FVIII products was heterogenous, and was raised not only towards the non‐functional B‐domain but also towards both FL‐rFVIII and BDD‐rFVIII. In patients considered successfully treated with immune tolerance induction, 25.4% had remaining FVIII antibodies. The number of families with an antibody response in all siblings was increased when the total antibody response was taken into account, further supporting the concept of a genetic predisposition of the immune response. Further studies and careful monitoring over time are required to appreciate the immune response on the risk of inhibitor development or recurrence in the future.     

New early prophylaxis regimen that avoids immunological danger signals can reduce FVIII inhibitor development

Summary. The most problematic complication of haemophilia A treatment is the development of inhibitors to FVIII. The highest risk of developing inhibitors is during the first 20 exposure days (EDs). If the patient can be brought through this high risk period without inhibitor development, the subsequent risk is low. Therefore, as a pilot project, we developed a prophylaxis regimen for the first 20–50 EDs specifically designed to induce tolerance to the administered FVIII and to minimize inhibitor development by avoiding immunological danger signals. Twenty‐six consecutive previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A were treated with the new prophylaxis regimen and the incidence of inhibitor development in this group was compared with that in a historical control group of 30 consecutive PUPs treated with a standard joint protection prophylaxis regimen (40–50 IU kg^?1, three times a week). There were no significant differences between the study and control groups in patient‐related inhibitor risk factors such as ethnicity (all Caucasian), severity of haemophilia (all <1% FVIII), severity of FVIII gene mutation (P < 0.0006) nor in some treatment‐related factors such as product type, age at first exposure, vaccination regimen or the need for surgery. 14 of 30 subjects given standard prophylaxis but only one of the 26 subjects given the new regimen developed an inhibitor (P = 0.0003, odds ratio 0.048, 95% CI: 0.001–0.372). Our results indicate that minimizing danger signals during the first 20 EDs with FVIII may reduce the risk of inhibitor formation. These results should be confirmed in a larger prospective clinical study.     

Characteristics of hemophilia patients with factor VIII inhibitors detected by prospective screening

Characteristics of inhibitors identified by prospective screening may differ from those detected clinically. In a prospective study at 17 hemophilia centers with central inhibitor measurement by Nijmegen‐Bethesda assay, 23 (2.8%) of 824 hemophilia A patients had new inhibitors detected: nine high‐titer inhibitors (HTI: 7 ≥ 5.0 NBU plus 2 of 2.6 and 3.4 NBU at immune tolerance induction initiation) and 14 low‐titer inhibitors (LTI: 0.5–1.9 NBU). HTI occurred at an earlier age (median 2 years, range 1–18, vs. median 11 years, range 2–61, P = 0.016). Both HTI (22%) and LTI (43%) occurred in non‐severe patients. All HTI, but only 64% of LTI, were found to be FVIII‐specific by chromogenic Bethesda assay or fluorescence immunoassay (FLI), indicating a high rate of false‐positive LTI. Repeat specimens confirmed all HTI, 7/9 LTI, and 7/7 FVIII‐specific LTI. FLI results were similar between HTI and FVIII‐specific LTI; all included IgG₁ and IgG₄ subclasses. A comparable prospective study conducted from 1975 to 1979 at 13 U.S. centers found 31 (2.4%) new inhibitors among 1,306 patients. In both studies, one‐third of inhibitors occurred in non‐severe patients and one‐quarter after 150 exposure days (ED). Significant differences were seen in the age at which inhibitors occurred (median 16 years in the older study vs. 5 years currently, P = 0.024) and in ED before inhibitor development, 10% in the older study and 43% currently study occurring within 20 ED, suggesting a temporal change in inhibitor development. Prospective screening detects inhibitors in patients of all severities, ages, and ED. Some LTI, however, are false positives. Am. J. Hematol. 90:871–876, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A longitudinal evaluation of anti‐FVIII antibodies demonstrated IgG4 subclass is mainly correlated with high‐titre inhibitor in haemophilia A patients

The development of inhibitory antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) (inhibitor) is the major complication in haemophilia A patients. The FVIII‐binding antibodies development comprises a polyclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) G response. Recent studies showed strong correlation between the presence of neutralizing anti‐FVIII antibodies (inhibitors) and IgG4 subclass. The aim of this study was to evaluate anti‐FVIII IgG subclasses in haemophilia A patients with inhibitor both in a cross‐sectional and in a longitudinal analysis. Inhibitors were determined by Nijmegen–Bethesda assay. Anti‐FVIII IgG subclasses were performed by ELISA, and samples from 20 healthy individuals were used to validate the test. We studied 25 haemophilia A patients with inhibitor, previously treated exclusively with plasma‐derived FVIII concentrates or bypassing agents. The IgG subclasses distributions were evaluated in two groups of patients classified according to inhibitor response. IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies were most prominent in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors when compared with IgG2 and IgG3. This study reports for the first time the behaviour of FVIII‐binding IgG1 and IgG4 subclasses in a longitudinal analysis, in a clinical setting, of high‐response inhibitor haemophilia A patients, showing the correlation of IgG4 and the inhibitor titres. In spite of being considered a non‐pathologic antibody subclass with anti‐inflammatory properties in other situations, IgG4 is correlated with the presence of high‐titre inhibitor in the haemophilia setting. The comprehension of the IgG4 role in immune response may be crucial to establish the process for designing specific tolerance to FVIII.     

Postauthorization safety surveillance of ADVATE [antihaemophilic factor (recombinant), plasma/albumin‐free method] demonstrates efficacy,safety and low‐risk for immunogenicity in routine clinical practice

Summary. Postauthorization safety surveillance of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates is essential for assessing rare adverse event incidence. We determined safety and efficacy of ADVATE [antihaemophilic factor (recombinant), plasma/albumin‐free method, (rAHF‐PFM)] during routine clinical practice. Subjects with differing haemophilia A severities and medical histories were monitored during 12 months of prophylactic and/or on‐demand therapy. Among 408 evaluable subjects, 386 (95%) received excellent/good efficacy ratings for all on‐demand assessments; the corresponding number for subjects with previous FVIII inhibitors was 36/41 (88%). Among 276 evaluable subjects receiving prophylaxis continuously in the study, 255 (92%) had excellent/good ratings for all prophylactic assessments; the corresponding number for subjects with previous FVIII inhibitors was 41/46 (89%). Efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent/good in 16/16 evaluable procedures. Among previously treated patients (PTPs) with >50 exposure days (EDs) and FVIII ≤2%, three (0.75%) developed low‐titre inhibitors. Two of these subjects had a positive inhibitor history; thus, the incidence of de novo inhibitor formation in PTPs with FVIII ≤2% and no inhibitor history was 1/348 (0.29%; 95% CI, 0.01–1.59%). A PTP with moderate haemophilia developed a low‐titre inhibitor. High‐titre inhibitors were reported in a PTP with mild disease (following surgery), a previously untreated patient (PUP) with moderate disease (following surgery) and a PUP with severe disease. The favourable benefit/risk profile of rAHF‐PFM previously documented in prospective clinical trials has been extended to include a broader range of haemophilia patients, many of whom would have been ineligible for registration studies.     

Prophylaxis with FEIBA in paediatric patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors

The benefits shown with factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis relating to joint health and quality of life (QoL) provide the rationale for FEIBA prophylaxis in haemophilia A patients with persistent FVIII inhibitors. FEIBA has previously shown efficacy in preventing bleeds in inhibitor patients who failed to respond to, or were ineligible for immune tolerance induction (ITI). The study examined the outcome of paediatric patients undergoing long‐term FEIBA prophylaxis. A retrospective chart review included severe haemophilia A patients with persistent inhibitors aged ≤13 years at the start of FEIBA prophylaxis. Baseline characteristics captured dose, frequency of prophylaxis, history of inhibitor development, including baseline titre, historical peak titre and history of ITI. Outcome measurements included annual bleed rate before and during FEIBA prophylaxis, joint status and school days missed. Sixteen cases of FEIBA prophylaxis from two centres are presented. The mean age of subjects at prophylaxis initiation was 7.5 ± 3.6 years and median baseline inhibitor titre was 23 (range 3.1–170) BU. Prior to prophylaxis initiation, median annual joint bleeds among all patients was 4 (0–48), which dropped significantly after the first year of prophylaxis, to a median annual joint bleed rate of 1 (0–7; P = 0.0179). Subsequent years (median = 9) of prophylaxis therapy demonstrated similarly low annual joint bleed rates. There were no life‐threatening bleeds, no viral seroconversions or thrombotic events during FEIBA prophylaxis treatment. FEIBA prophylaxis was effective for preventing joint bleeds and subsequent joint damage, delaying arthropathy and improving outcomes in children with haemophilia A and inhibitors to FVIII, who failed or were ineligible for ITI.     

Persistent factor VIII inhibitors and orthopaedic complications in children with severe haemophilia A

Summary. Persistence of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) may be a risk factor that increases physical disability in haemophilia A (HA) patients. This study aimed to evaluate prevalence of FVIII inhibitors in previously treated children with severe HA and the impact of persistent inhibitors on knee joint status and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). Fifty children with severe HA, FVIII <1%; aged 5–16 years were enrolled in this study; they received plasma‐derived FVIII on‐demand treatment for 50–250 exposure days (EDs). Inhibitors were checked at basal visit and were followed up for 1 year, using Bethesda assay. Cross‐sectional clinical scoring and radiological evaluation of the knee joint (by Arnold‐Hilgartner staging and Pettersson score), along with lumbar BMD by Dual Energy X‐ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) were performed. Patients with persistent inhibitors for 1 to 5 years, median 2.5 years, were 10 (20%). Six had high titre and none of them had completely normal knees, seven had advanced knee arthropathy and six had low lumbar BMD in comparison to 2 and 8 of the 40 patients without inhibitors respectively (P < 0.05). Persistence of inhibitors for more than 2 years without immuno‐prophylaxis was a risk factor for joint damage. Low lumbar BMD was found in 88.9% of patients with stages four and five knee arthropathy and in 66.7% of patients with positive hepatitis C. Severe HA children in this Egyptian study had a relatively low prevalence of persistent FVIII inhibitors, which, if not treated, may increase the risk of knee arthropathy and lumbar osteopenia.     

Long‐term anti‐FVIII antibody response in Bethesda‐negative haemophilia A patients receiving continuous replacement therapy

It has previously been shown that patients with haemophilia A may develop non‐neutralizing anti‐factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (NNA) that escape detection by the Bethesda assay, but are detected using immune‐based assays. We and others found NNAs to be directed not only towards non‐functional parts of the protein, but towards all regions of the FVIII protein. We also showed a heterogeneous antibody response towards different FVIII products. However, the clinical relevance and the natural history of NNA remain unclear. Therefore, we followed a cohort of unrelated subjects with haemophilia A for 4 years with the goal of exploring the long‐term development of NNA using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ten of 78 subjects (12·8%) exhibited an immune response that was transient and heterogeneous, and none of the subjects developed an FVIII inhibitor. The result of the ELISA was examined in relation to clinical variables and no significant associations between a positive ELISA and age, F8 mutation, port‐à‐cath implantation and HCV infection were shown. Interestingly, patients with NNA had significantly fewer bleeding episodes (P = 0·048) compared with NNA‐negative subjects. The results indicate that the immune response to FVIII products within an individual may vary over time. However, the clinical impact of NNA remains unclear.     

Thrombin generation as objective parameter of treatment response in patients with severe haemophilia A and high‐titre inhibitors

In Mexico, 15% of haemophilia A (HA) patients develop inhibitory alloantibodies in response to replacement therapy with factor VIII (FVIII), requiring bypass therapy such as activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC). Because bypass therapy has not been broadly available in Mexico even in recent years, this study aimed to evaluate the thrombin generation assay (TGA) in assessing the response to FVIII or APCC treatment in patients with severe HA positive to inhibitors. We studied 189 patients with severe HA. Clinical severity was verified by one‐stage APTT‐based clotting assay. Inhibitors to FVIII were investigated by the Nijmegen–Bethesda (N–B) method, and type of inhibition was assessed through serial plasma dilutions. Thrombin generation was measured with the calibrated automated thrombogram in inhibitor‐positive plasmas previously spiked and incubated with FVIII or APCC. Data were analysed using anova , Student or Fisher's exact tests. We detected 47 (24.9%) subjects with high‐titre (5–1700 N–B U mL^?1) and 25 (13.2%) subjects with low‐titre inhibitor antibodies (0.6–4.7 N–B U mL^?1). We found an association between kinetic behaviour and clinical response to FVIII (P = 0.0049) or vs. FVIII response evaluated with TGA (P = 0.0007). Global concordance between clinical and in vitro response was 70%. By evaluating the capacity of thrombin formation in a plasma sample, TGA predicts the response to FVIII or APCC therapy and allows individual optimization of resources in patients with severe HA and high‐titre inhibitors. The inhibition pattern of the antibodies to FVIII:C correlated with the TGA parameters and showed an association with the clinical response to FVIII.     

ELISA system for detection of immune responses to FVIII: a study of 246 samples and correlation with the Bethesda assay

Inhibitors of FVIII are usually IgG polyclonal antibodies that develop as alloimmune responses in patients with congenital haemophilia A or as autoimmune responses resulting in acquired haemophilia. Their recognition can be difficult, especially when the titre is low. Furthermore, results from a Bethesda assay often require several days as samples are referred to a specialty laboratory. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of an ELISA system for detecting immune responses to FVIII. A total of 246 plasma samples submitted from 176 individuals with immune responses to FVIII, as verified with the Bethesda assay, and samples from 50 control subjects were tested for the presence of FVIII-specific IgG using an ELISA-based assay. Paired sera from 18 of the patients were also tested by the ELISA. Of the 246 samples that were positive for a FVIII inhibitor by the Bethesda assay, 235 (95.5%) were also positive by ELISA. The regression coefficient, using Log BU was r = 0.82. The correlation data were strengthened when 27 inhibitor samples were diluted further. There was a strong correlation between ELISA results for the 18-paired serum and plasma samples (r = 0.99). There is a strong correlation between the ELISA and Bethesda methods in detecting immune responses to FVIII. The ELISA provides rapid screening that could be available well in advance of confirmation by the Bethesda assay.     

Low factor VIII recovery in haemophilia A patients without inhibitor titre is not due to the presence of anti-factor VIII antibodies undetectable by the Bethesda assay

Measurements of factor VIII (FVIII) recovery in previously untreated patients with haemophilia A were done as part of the clinical trial of safety and efficacy of the recombinant FVIII, Recombinate. In 22 of 72 assessable patients, positive inhibitor titres > or = 0.6 Bethesda units mL-1 were detected by the Bethesda assay in one or more plasma samples, and the remaining 50 patients were negative at all timepoints. Of the latter group, 16 individuals without inhibitors unexpectedly had both normal (111) and low (52) recoveries during the study. We investigated the possibility that other antibodies not detectable in the Bethesda assay were responsible for the low recovery, by using a highly sensitive immunopreciptation (IP) assay for detection of all antiFVIII antibodies. Eight of the 16 patients with low and normal recoveries did indeed have antibodies detected by the IP assay, and the remaining eight were negative. Four antibody-positive individuals had insignificantly low titres, and the other four had modest to high titres. In the latter group, antibodies were found with similar frequencies and titre in plasmas from patients with low or normal recovery. Low recovery in haemophilia A patients without inhibitor titres must therefore be attributed to factors other than antiFVIII.     

Laboratory identification of factor VIII inhibitors in the real world: the experience from Australasia

Summary. The laboratory has a key role in the initial detection of factor inhibitors and an ongoing role in the measurement of inhibitor titres during the course of inhibitor eradication therapy. The most commonly seen factor inhibitors are those directed against factor VIII (FVIII), usually detected either using the original or Nijmegen‐modified Bethesda assay. In view of previously demonstrated high variability in laboratory results for inhibitor assays, we have more extensively examined laboratory performance in the identification of FVIII inhibitors. Over the past 3 years, we conducted two questionnaire‐based surveys and two wet‐challenge surveys utilizing eight samples comprising no FVIII inhibitor (n = 1), or low‐titre (n = 2), medium‐titre (n = 3) or high‐titre (n = 2) FVIII inhibitor. Four samples were tested by 42 laboratories in 2007, and four by 52 laboratories in 2009. High inter‐laboratory variation was evident, with CVs around 50% not uncommon, and some 10% of all laboratories (or around 15% of laboratories using Bethesda method) failed to detect low‐level inhibitors of around 1 BU mL^?1. Laboratories using the Nijmegen method appeared to perform better than those using a standard Bethesda assay, with lower evident assay variation and no false negatives. There was a wide variety of laboratory practice, with no two laboratories using exactly the same process for testing and interpretation of factor inhibitor findings. In conclusion, our study indicates that there is still much need for standardization and improvement in factor inhibitor detection, and we hope that our findings provide a basis for future improvements in this area.     

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti‐FVIII or anti‐FIX antibodies of IgG₄ subclass best correlate with the presence of functional inhibitors. Improvements in inhibitor measurement have been recently introduced. Preanalytical heat treatment of patient specimens allows testing of patients without delaying treatment. Use of chromogenic and immunologic assays may aid in identification of false‐positive results, which are frequent among low‐titre inhibitors. Validated reagent substitutions can be used to reduce assay cost. New methods for defining assay positivity and reporting low‐titre inhibitors have been suggested. Challenges remain in the areas of quality control, assay standardization, monitoring of patients undergoing immune tolerance induction therapy and testing in the presence of modified and novel treatment products.     

High incidence of anti-FVIII antibodies against non-coagulant epitopes in haemophilia A patients: a possible role for the half-life of transfused FVIII

The occurrence of antibodies (Abs) capable of inhibiting factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity is a severe complication in haemophilia A, leading to the inhibition of transfused FVIII activity. It is not known whether, or to what extent, post-transfusion antibodies may also arise against non-coagulant epitopes. Therefore we set up a system capable, in theory, to detect all the FVIII-induced antibodies by use of an enzyme-linked immunoassorbent assay (ELISA) based on coating human recombinant FVIII onto polystyrene microtitre plates. Serum samples from 23 patients affected by haemophilia A of different gravity (22 referred to our Centre and one to the Bari Centre) were analysed. Although only one patient was positive at Bethesda assay, the presence of antibodies in ELISA was detected in 39% of patients in variable degrees; transfusion with FVIII was found to induce a raise in antibody titre, arguing in favour of the specificity of the phenomenon. The clinical relevance of these non-inhibitory antibodies was evaluated in three patients; although half-life did not show any change in the patients without or with low amount of antibodies, FVIII clearance was found enhanced in the patient displaying high titre antibodies. We propose detection of anti-FVIII antibodies by ELISA when routinely assessing haemophilia A patients.     

The Epidemiology of FVIII Inhibitors in Indian Haemophilia A Patients

A serious complication of replacement therapy in patients with bleeding disorders is the development of ‘inhibitors’, particularly FVIII inhibitors in haemophilia A patients. This leads to an increase in the management cost, morbidity and mortality, especially post-operatively. The mechanism of FVIII inhibitor development is quite complex and it is difficult to predict inhibitor development, but a prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical as early therapy can save lives. The aim of this study was to screen patients with bleeding disorders in India for inhibitors, and to analyse and compare the prevalence of inhibitors in different regions in India. Patient details were recorded and blood samples were collected in sodium citrate vacutainers from 1,505 patients with bleeding disorders, in different cities in India. Coagulation and inhibitor screening assays were performed, followed by the Bethesda assay in inhibitor positive samples to quantify the FVIII inhibitor titre. Out of the 1,505 samples analysed, 1,285 were Haemophilia A patients, out of which 78 (6.07 %) were positive for ‘FVIII Inhibitors’. The highest incidence of FVIII Inhibitors was seen in South India (13.04 %). The highest incidence of 20.99 % was observed in Chennai, followed by Hyderabad (13.33 %), Jammu (9.90 %) and Guwahati (8.51 %), respectively, with respect to the samples analysed. The other regions showed an inhibitor incidence <8 %. The incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia A patients is different in different regions of India; this may be due to the intensity of treatment, type of product or the genetic characteristics of these patients.     

Influence of the type of F8 gene mutation on inhibitor development in a single centre cohort of severe haemophilia A patients

Summary. The development of neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of treatment with FVIII in patients with severe haemophilia A. This study was designed to describe the relationship between the type and location of the factor 8 (F8) gene mutation and the development of clinically relevant inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A. We conducted a single centre cohort study among 318 consecutive patients (baseline FVIII activity level <0.01 IU mL^?1) born between 1934 and 2007 who were treated with FVIII on at least 50 exposure days. The primary outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least two positive inhibitor titres and a decreased recovery. Clinically relevant inhibitors were diagnosed in 14% (43) of patients (30 high‐titre). The cumulative incidence of inhibitor development was 18% (35 of 200) in high‐risk gene defects (67% in patients with large deletions, 30% in patients with nonsense mutations, 15% in patients with intron 1 or 22 inversions) and 7% (8 of 118) in low‐risk gene defects (7% in patients with small deletions and insertions, 6% in patients with missense mutations, 8% in patients with splice site mutations). In patients with point mutations, the cumulative risk of developing inhibitors was highest in patients with mutations in the A3 and C2 domains (13% and 17% respectively). In conclusion, in agreement with earlier observations, the type and location of the F8 gene mutation were important determinants of inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A.     

Thrombin generation in haemophilia A patients with mutations causing factor VIII assay discrepancy

Summary. Up to 40% of patients with mild haemophilia A have a discrepancy whereby factor VIII (FVIII) measurements by a two‐stage chromogenic assay (FVIII:C_CH) are disproportionately reduced compared with the FVIII one‐stage clotting value (FVIII:C). Which assay best reflects the coagulation potential and clinical phenotype in this patient group is of clinical significance, yet remains unclear. We have assessed the global coagulant ability of haemophilia patients with FVIII assay discrepancy using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT). A total of 18 patients with mutations Arg531His/Cys or Arg698Trp causing FVIII discrepancy were investigated, together with 12 haemophilia patients with concordant FVIII values and 15 normal controls. Factor VIII levels in all patients and controls were measured using both one‐stage clotting assay and two‐stage chromogenic assay. Thrombin generation was assessed in platelet‐poor plasma by CAT using a low tissue factor concentration (1 pm ). FVIII:C_CH values were below normal in all patients, and in the discrepant group were between 1.5‐ and 8‐fold lower than FVIII:C values. CAT parameters were affected in all haemophilia patients. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was reduced to 58–67% of the mean normal value (1301 nm min^?1), whereas peak thrombin was further reduced to 27–30% of the mean normal value (178 nm ) in both discrepant and concordant patient groups. Analysis of the discrepant patient group showed the most significant correlation between the one‐stage FVIII:C assay and ETP (r² = 0.44) and peak thrombin parameters (r² = 0.27).     

False-positive results in ELISA-based anti FVIII antibody assay may occur with lupus anticoagulant and phospholipid antibodies

Summary. The evaluation of a prolonged aPTT often includes Lupus Anticoagulant, Antiphospholipid Antibodies, and Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. We have noticed that patient samples positive for lupus antibody (LA) are frequently also positive for FVIII IgG antibodies in an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indicating the need for follow‐up testing with a more labour‐intensive functional assay for FVIII inhibition. This study evaluates the potential for a FVIII IgG ELISA to yield false‐positive results in patient samples positive for LA or other antiphospholipid antibodies. A total of 289 residual de‐identified patient samples positive for LA (n = 143), anti‐cardiolipin IgG (n = 84), or beta2‐glycoprotein antibody (n = 62) were tested for FVIII IgG using a commercial ELISA. Samples with positive FVIII IgG ELISA results were further tested for FVIII activity using a clot‐based FVIII inhibitor assay. The FVIII IgG ELISA yielded positive results in 39 (13%) of the samples tested, including 13/143 (13%) LA‐positive, 15/85 (18%) aCL IgG‐positive and 6/62 (10%) β2‐glycoprotein IgG‐positive samples. The clot‐based FVIII inhibitor assay yielded negative results in all 39 FVIII IgG‐positive specimens tested, indicating discrepancy with the FVIII IgG ELISA results. Patient specimens positive for LA, aCL IgG, or β2‐glycoprotein IgG may yield false‐positive results for FVIII antibodies. Caution is warranted in interpreting FVIII antibody results in these cases.     

Evaluation of a novel ELISA screening test for detection of factor VIII inhibitory antibodies in haemophiliacs

Treatment of patients with haemophilia A with coagulation factor concentrates may result in the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII). In this study, a previously unpublished ELISA test for FVIII inhibitor screening (Genetic Testing Institute [GTI] FVIII inhibitor, Brookfield, WI, USA) was evaluated in 131 blood samples (124 samples from patients with haemophilia A, and seven serial samples from one patient with an acquired FVIII inhibitor). Comparisons were made with the routine screening assay (based on recovery of FVIII) and confirmed where positive (< 90% recovery) with the New Oxford assay. The ELISA kit had a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 78.4%. The high negative predictive value of this new test (98.6%) suggests it may be useful as a reliable, rapid (< 2 h) and flexible (microwell strip format) tool for inhibitor screening of samples from both patients with haemophilia A and those with suspected acquired FVIII inhibitors.