Usefulness of different stimuli in visual evoked potentials

The goal of this study was to determine the relative usefulness of the flash (FL), pattern reversal (PR) of 56', and PR of 28' in 62 patients (pts) with either MS (34) or non-MS (28) compared with normals (19). An abnormal visual evoked potential was found in 58%, 69%, and 81% of the eyes tested in possible, probable, and definite MS and in 88% of the non-MS group. The 28' PR produced the most abnormal responses, the greatest number with either greater than 3 standard deviations (SD) from the mean or greater than 2 SD in both MS and non-MS groups. The FL was second best at producing the most abnormal responses, but more often produced the only abnormality (29), compared with 28' PR (11). The 56' PR produced the only abnormality in none of the MS pts and in only one of the non-MS pts. In all categories (most abnormal, greater than 3 SD, greater than 2 SD, the only abnormality of greater than 3 SD or greater than 2 SD, and other peaks abnormal), the 28' PR was usually by far the best stimulus for definite (and probable) MS, but equally as effective was the FL in the possible MS pts Our data suggest the usefulness of 28' and not 56' PR, but the FL is especially useful in pts with possible MS.     

Hemispheric differences for visual evoked potentials from checkerboard stimuli

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were elicited in right-handed male subjects with an alternating checkerboard pattern stimulus presented to either the left or right visual half-field. The sizes of the individual checks in different conditions were 0.25, 0.5, 2.0, or 4.0 cycles/degree of visual angle. The amplitude of the P100 VEP decreased while peak latency increased as check size decreased across both visual field conditions. Left hemisphere responses demonstrated significantly larger P100 amplitudes compared to the right hemisphere responses, although the interaction between hemisphere and stimulus size was not significant. No hemispheric effects of P100 latency were observed. The results suggest that the left hemisphere is engaged more than the right hemisphere for the sensory analysis of visual stimuli composed of straight edges over a wide range of spatial frequencies.     

Vector analysis of visual evoked potentials elicited by pattern reversal and photic stimuli.

OBJECTIVE: The 2D VEPs to pattern reversal (PR) and LED goggle were studied in order to obtain a stable parameter for the functional assessing of posterior visual pathways regardless of the stimulus type used. DESIGN AND METHODS: Apex c latency, bc segment amplitude (V), and bc vector orientation angle (theta) in voltage space were computed from VEPs recorded in 50 normal human beings and two patients with left posterior brain lesions, in an orthogonal Fpz-Oz and T3-T4 montage and displayed as a two channel Lissajous' trajectory. The effects of stimulus type and stimulated eye were analyzed in the normal group by a two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The stimulated eye had no effect on any parameter. Apex c latency was slightly longer, and V was greater and more variable in the responses to goggle stimuli, but there was no significant difference in theta, oriented to mid-occipital scalp with very low variability for both stimulus types. The patients showed significant deviations of theta towards the affected hemisphere. CONCLUSIONS: The bc vector orientation (theta) is a stable parameter for the evaluation of the posterior visual pathways using both pattern reversal and LED stimuli, specially the latter, useful in unconscious or uncooperative patients.     

Auditory and visual evoked potentials to irrelevant stimuli during conditioning to a visual stimulus

Amplitude changes of evoked responses to irrelevant auditory (click) and visual (optic tract stimulation) stimuli were examined during appetitive conditioning to a flashing light. Four female cats, with chronically implanted electrodes along the visual and auditory pathways, were conditioned with pairings of a flashing light and food reinforcement. The results showed that, as conditioning progressed, the auditory evoked potentials were attenuated while the visual evoked potentials did not change significantly. The data seem to indicate possible differences in the neural processing of irrelevant information.     

Menstrual cycle synchronized changes in brain stem auditory evoked potentials and visual evoked potentials.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported changes in the spontaneous electroencephalogram of women across the menstrual cycle (MC), raising questions on whether sensory or cognitive evoked potentials would change with MC as well. Some of these studies have found changes synchronized with MC in visual event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), whereas others have reported none. METHODS: In the present study, we attempted to study the changes in P300 component of visual ERPs, and in BAEPs across the MC in healthy women. RESULTS: The latency of P300 was longer during the ovulatory phase. Decrease across the MC phases was found for the amplitude of BAEP waves I and III, and for the wave V latency and the III-V interpeak latency. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that there may be a small relationship between visual ERP or BAEP and MC phase.     

Intracortical evoked potentials of cats elicited by punctate visual stimuli in receptive field peripheries

Intracortical visual evoked potentials, related to stimulus eccentricity from receptive field center, were investigated as a possible measure of interaction among adjacent populations of cortical neurons. Displacement of the stimuli from field center resulted in (1) a progressive decline in amplitude of the primary potential and (2) an enhancement or development of longer latency (60–100 ms) ‘secondary’ potentials often not apparent with field center stimulation.     

Hemispheric asymmetry in processing visual half-field pattern-reversal stimuli assessed by reaction time and evoked potentials

Reversing checkerboard patterns, like those used to elicit clinical visual evoked potentials (VEPs), were adapted to the study of cerebral lateralization of visual processing in a divided visual field experiment. Seventeen right-handed subjects (9 male, 8 female) provided left- and right-handed responses to pattern-reversal stimuli presented in left, right and both visual half-fields in pseudorandom order. Simple unwarned RTs were shorter for left- compared with right-field stimuli under left-hand response conditions. Parietal VEPs obtained from 9 of the subjects showed larger amplitudes for left compared with right field stimuli at the right hemisphere. The results were consistent with an efficiency model of cerebral dominance incorporating both interhemispheric transfer time and a reduced efficiency for left hemisphere processing of our patterned visual stimuli.     

Motor potentials evoked by paired cortical stimuli.

We recorded the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle, after supramaximal electrical transcranial stimulation, and studied the effect of paired transcranial shocks with varying interstimulus time intervals, in 10 normal subjects, 4 patients with median nerve neuropathy and 2 patients with motoneurone disease. In relaxed muscles the amplitude of the MEP evoked by a single shock averaged 30% of the M wave. With intervals from 1 to 2.5 msec 2 shocks evoked one MEP far larger in size than the control MEP (70% of the M wave). With intervals of 10 msec and longer, the 2 shocks evoked 2 independent MEPs; the size of the MEP following the second shock (test) was inversely correlated with the size of the control MEP: the more the control MEP approached the size of the M wave, the smaller the test MEP. Single motor unit records showed that, in the normal subjects and patients with peripheral neuropathy, the same motor unit was activated either by the first or the second shock, whereas in the patients with motoneurone disease it fired twice. In active muscles, the control MEP averaged 70% of the M wave. With intervals of 10 msec and longer the test MEP was markedly suppressed; with 100 msec intervals it fully recovered. In relaxed muscles, by delivering a double shock at a 1.5 msec interval, thus evoking a large MEP, followed by a second double-shock, the test MEP was completely suppressed for a period of 20 msec; it began to recover at 50 msec intervals and fully recovered after 150 msec.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Magnetic stimulation motor evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Comparison with visual evoked potentials, brain stem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials]

This study consists of 45 patients with clinically definite MS, laboratory supported definite MS and clinically probable MS. We compared MEP results with other multimodal evoked potentials (VEP, BAEP and SEP). The abnormal rate of MEP was 87.6%, which was the highest. Abnormal MEP showed prolonged central motor conduction time (CMCT), consistent with pathological change of the demyelination. There was a evident correlation between the abnormal MEP and VEP, which is consistent with the most common MS (Devic Syndrome) in our country.     

Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to lateralized light flashes were recorded from the parietal midline, and from homologous occipital and central sites, in a GO/NOGO reaction time task. The N160 component of the VEP was found to be larger over the hemisphere contralateral to the visual field of stimulus exposure at all pairs of lateral electrodes. At the occipital sites only, N160 latency was also shorter from the contralateral hemisphere, by an average of approximately 14msec. This was not so centrally, where a non-significant value of approximately 4 msec was obtained. These data are considered to be consistent with Milner and Lines' hypothesis that callosal transmission occurs at different rates in different functional regions of the corpus callosum.     

Late magnetic fields and positive evoked potentials following infrequent and unpredictable omissions of visual stimuli

Randomized and infrequent omissions during presentation of a steady train of visual stimulation produced distinctive wave forms of both the magnetic fields and electrical potentials. Electrical potentials at Pz showed a positive peak in response to the omitted stimuli which occurred on the average 445 msec after the time when a stimulus was anticipated. Analyses of the magnetic wave forms indicated that at least two separate sources appear to be active coincident with the electrical positive peak. One source localized in the occipital lobes in the vicinity of the visual cortex while the other source was located in the medial aspects of the temporal lobe or even deeper in the lateral thalamus. Judging from the calculated direction of current flow it appeared that the deep source would contribute greater potentials in the frontal areas of the scalp while the source in the occipital area would contribute to more posterior placement of electrodes, especially at Pz.     

Scotopic multifocal visual evoked potentials

ObjectiveTo investigate the scope of scotopic multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP_S) for the assessment of scotopic visual fields.MethodsPattern-reversal mfVEP for photopic (mfVEP_P) and scotopic conditions (mfVEP_S; 0.003 cd/m²) were recorded from 36 visual field locations of a circular checkerboard pattern (25° radius) in 9 participants with normal vision. MfVEP_P were recorded with a conventional central fixation cross, mfVEP_S were recorded (i) with (mfVEP_S+) and (ii) without (mfVEP_S?) an additional fixation aid. Latency shifts were determined using cross-correlations, mfVEP magnitudes were analysed in an eccentricity dependent manner using signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).ResultsIn comparison to mfVEP_P, mfVEP_S? and mfVEP_S+ were delayed by 101 ms and 97 ms, respectively, and had smaller signal-to-noise-ratios. Both mfVEP_S were reduced down to noise level in the center and also severely reduced for the most peripheral stimulus eccentricity used. The visual-field-coverage for the paracentral eccentricities of mfVEP_S+ and mfVEP_S? was 76% and 65% [4°–9°], respectively, and 79% and 66% [9°–16°].ConclusionsMfVEP_S were delayed compared to mfVEP_P and demonstrated the expected central response drop-out typical for scotopic vision.SignificanceMfVEP_S may hold promise of an objective, spatially resolved visual field test which motivates testing it in patients with diseases affecting scotopic vision.     

Biofeedback of visual evoked potentials

The present study investigated the operant conditioning of visual evoked potentials within a latency range between 200 and 600 ms using a visual discrimination task, and scrutinized whether biofeedback-induced potential shifts covaried with behavioral responses (reaction time, RT). It could be demonstrated that subjects were able to modify their ERPs towards more or less positivity according to the instruction given. In addition, in could be shown that a biofeedback-induced greater positivity of the P300-complex was highly correlated with a decrease of reaction time. It is hypothesized that this could be due to a modification of P300-components reflecting information processing.     

Further investigation of visual evoked potentials elicited by lateralized stimuli: effects of stimulus eccentricity and reference site

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to small lateralized flashes were recorded from the parietal midline, homotopic lateral central and occipital electrodes, and from left and right mastoid processes, all referred to a balanced non-cephalic reference. Two stimulus eccentricities, 4 degrees and 10 degrees, were employed, and a comparison made between the non-cephalic and linked mastoid references. P120 (measured at lateral occipital sites only) peaked earlier and was of smaller amplitude at the electrode contralateral to the visual field of stimulus exposure. N160 peaked earlier at central than occipital sites, was larger from electrodes over the contralateral hemisphere, and at the occipital sites only, peaked earlier in the electrode contralateral to the visual field of stimulus exposure. These effects were virtually unaffected by the eccentricity manipulation and it is concluded that light scatter across the visual midline is unlikely to be responsible for the observed pattern of ipsilateral-contralateral VEP asymmetries. The mastoids were found to detect significant stimulus-locked activity in the same latency range as the occipital N160 component. However, comparison of the non-cephalic and linked mastoid references revealed only non-specific effects, and no sign of any change in the pattern of ipsilateral-contralateral VEP asymmetries, or the magnitude of the associated latency differences. It is concluded that these effects may be of value in the study of callosal transfer.