A phase I trial of docetaxel and 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the recommended doses for further trials of docetaxel in combination with a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients who had been treated previously with at least one chemotherapeutic regimen, patients were treated with docetaxel as a 1-h infusion on day 1 followed by 5-FU as a continuous infusion on days 1 through 5 every 3-4 weeks. Three or six patients were assessed at the following escalating dose levels of docetaxel/5-FU per day: 40/150, 40/300, 50/300, 50/500 and 60/500 mg m(-2). Nineteen patients entered this trial, of whom 18 could be assessed for adverse event and therapeutic efficacy. The DLTs were neutropenia and diarrhoea. The MTDs were 60 mg m(-2) of docetaxel on day 1 and 500 mg m(-2) per day of 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU. One of 18 patients achieved a complete response and eight achieved partial response (over all response rate: 50%). The recommended doses of docetaxel and 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU for a phase II trial are 50 mg m(-2) and 500 mg m(-2) per day every 3 or 4 weeks.     

Docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy: a phase I, dose-finding study

This phase I study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 32 patients received docetaxel at 60, 75, 85 or 100 mg/m(2) by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed, after a 1-h interval, by 5-FU at 250, 350, 500 or 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion over 5 days every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting stomatitis defined the maximum tolerated dose at a docetaxel dose of 100 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day. None of 5 patients treated at the previous dose level (docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day) had a dose-limiting toxicity in the first cycle, and this was, therefore, considered the recommended dose. The combination was generally well tolerated. Grade 4 neutropenia was common (29 patients; 91%), but no patient experienced febrile neutropenia of duration >3 days requiring i.v. antibiotics. An objective response was achieved by 18 patients overall (56%), and in 4 out of 5 patients treated with the determined recommended dose. No pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil was apparent. The activity of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day will be explored more extensively in phase II studies of patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.     

5-Fluorouracil as protracted continuous intravenous infusion can be added to full-dose docetaxel (Taxotere)-cisplatin in advanced gastric carcinoma: a phase I-II trial.

BACKGROUND: A phase I-II multicenter trial was conducted to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) according to tolerance and toxicity (primary objective), as well as to describe the clinical activity, in terms of response and survival (secondary objectives), of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in protracted continuous intravenous infusion (p.i.v.) with docetaxel and cisplatin for patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, World Health Organization performance status < or =1, normal hematological and renal functions, adequate hepatic function and not pretreated for advanced disease by chemotherapy, received up to eight cycles of a combination of docetaxel on day 1, cisplatin on day 1 and 5-FU p.i.v. on days 1-14 (TCF) every 3 weeks, which was escalated up to the MTD, defined by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in two patients in one dose level. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were accrued and treated (43 in the phase I part of the trial and nine additional at the recommended dose level). A median of five cycles/patient was given. The recommended dose of TCF was docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 5-FU p.i.v. 300 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14. Grade > or =3 toxicities were neutropenia 79%, alopecia 46%, fatigue 23%, mucositis 10%, diarrhea 19%, nausea/vomiting 13%, neurological 4% and palmar-plantar 2%. Ten non-fatal febrile neutropenia episodes were recorded in eight patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Among 41 patients with measurable disease (79%), we observed one complete and 20 partial responses for an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 51% (95% confidence interval 35-67%). Five patients (20%) had stable disease for > or =12 weeks (four cycles). The median overall survival was 9.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: 5-FU p.i.v. at 300 mg/m(2)/day for 2 weeks out of three could be safely added to the docetaxel-cisplatin (TC) combination, but the dose of docetaxel had to be reduced to 75 mg/m(2) in a subsequent phase II trial. This drug regimen seems to be very active in advanced gastric cancer. Comparison with both TC and ECF in a randomized SAKK trial is ongoing.     

Bimonthly high-dose leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil infusion and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX3) for metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to the same leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen

Background: FOLFOX2, a bimonthly regimen of high-dose leucovorin (LV), 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (LV–5-FU) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) produced a high response rate (46%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 31%–60%) in 5-FU pre-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In this phase II study, pre-treated patients were given a lower dose of oxaliplatin to reduce the toxic effects of the regimen.Patients and methods: Thirty patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma and progression while receiving bimonthly LV–5-FU (LV: 500 mg/m2, 5-FU: 1.5–2 g /m2/ 22 hours, days 1–2, every two weeks), were given the same LV–5-FU schedule with the addition of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every two weeks (FOLFOX3).Results: The main toxic effects were peripheral neuropathy (90%) with four severe sensitive neuropathies (WHO grade 2: 13%). The response rate was 20% (95% CI: 8%–39%). Median progression-free survival was 26 weeks, median survival was 57 weeks from the start of FOLFOX3 and median duration of the response was 37 weeks.Conclusions: Results obtained with FOLFOX3 confirmed the synergy between oxaliplatin and 5-FU in 5-FU-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the response rate seems to be lower than that obtained with FOLFOX2. Further studies to determine the best oxaliplatin dose intensity are in progress.     

氟尿嘧啶及亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂和多西他赛治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

目的:观察5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)以及亚叶酸钙(CF)联合奥沙利铂(OXA)、多西他赛(TXT)治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应。方法:晚期胃癌患者81例,TXT 35~40 mg/m2,静脉滴入1 h,d1、d8;OXA 65 mg/m2,静脉滴入2 h,d1、d8;CF 200 mg/m2,静脉滴入2 h后,5-FU300 mg/m2,静脉推注,1 500 mg/m2持续静脉滴入72 h。21 d为1个周期,每连用2个周期后评价疗效及相关毒性反应。结果:全组80例可评价疗效,总有效率为71.3%(57/80),完全缓解2例,部分缓解55例,中位随访时间12个月,中位无进展生存为5.8个月,中位总生存11.3个月。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制所致的白细胞减少、恶心呕吐、外周神经毒性和腹泻。结论:DOLF方案治疗晚期胃癌近期疗效高,远期可延长患者生存时间,远期生存较理想,毒性反应可以耐受。     

Dose-finding study of docetaxel and doxorubicin in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin, and to evaluate the activity in patients with advanced breast cancer.Patients and methods: Forty-two women with untreated metastatic breast cancer (79% with visceral metastases; 52% with prior adjuvant anthracycline therapy) were treated with doxorubicin (40–60 mg/m2) i.v. bolus followed one hour later by docetaxel (50–85 mg/m2) one-hour i.v. infusion every three weeks, without G-CSF support.Results: The MTD occurred at the dose level combining 85 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 50 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, with the DLT being neutropenic sepsis. Neutropenia and/or its complications were manageable and no grade 3–4 or severe non-hematological toxicities were observed. Fluid retention was frequent but never severe. With a median cumulative dose of doxorubicin of 392 mg/m2 (240–559 mg/m2) and a median follow-up time of 29 months (9+–41), no congestive heart failure was observed. High activity was observed at all dose levels, particularly the last four, with a response rate of 81% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 62.5–92.5). Median time to progression was 46 weeks (6+–62). Two-year survival was 66%, and median survival has not yet been reached.Conclusions: Docetaxel–doxorubicin is feasible, safe and highly active. The incidence of febrile neutropenia without G-CSF requires careful monitoring but is acceptable in this setting. There does not appear to be an increase in the cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin. The recommended dose is either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 or docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, administered every three weeks.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel administered in combination with continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Encouraged by preclinical synergism between docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5FU), we conducted a Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the recommended dose for Phase II studies, and the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of this combination. Forty-two patients with advanced solid tumors, most of whom had been previously treated, received docetaxel on day 1 as a 1-h i.v. infusion, immediately followed by a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU, every 3 weeks without hematopoietic growth factor support. All patients were premedicated with methylprednisolone. Dose levels of docetaxel/SFU studied were (daily dose, in mg/m2) 60/300, 75/300, 75/500, 75/750, 85/750, 85/1000, and 75/1000. Forty-one patients were assessable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose determined during the first cycle was 1000 mg/m2/day for 5 days of 5FU with either 75 or 85 mg/m2 docetaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities at these dose levels were reversible secretory diarrhea (4 of 12 evaluable patients), stomatitis (2 patients), and febrile neutropenia (2 patients). Overall, grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were seen in 63.4% and 9.8% of the patients, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3/4 infection, which led to toxic death in one of them. There were five early deaths: (a) one was clearly treatment related; (b) two others were possibly treatment related or remotely treatment related; and (c) two deaths were not related to the study drugs. Partial responses were documented in 5 of 39 evaluable patients. Pharmacokinetic results of both drugs were consistent with those from single-agent studies. The recommended dose of this combination, which showed acceptable toxicity and antitumoral activity at various dose levels, is 85 mg/m2 docetaxel given as a 1-h i.v. infusion on day 1 immediately followed by a 5-day continuous i.v. infusion of 5FU (750 mg/m2/day). This study has been extended by adding cisplatin on day 1 of the combination of docetaxel and 5FU.     

Preliminary evaluation of chemotherapy with docetaxel, 5-FU, CDDP for recurrent esophageal cancer--a pilot study

A pilot study has been conducted since January 2002 to investigate whether chemotherapy with docetaxel, 5-FU, CDDP could be an effective regimen for recurrent esophageal cancer. Ten patients with recurrent esophageal cancer were treated with the combination of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 (day 1), CDDP 10 mg/body (days 1-5) and 5-FU 500 mg/body (days 1-5) at intervals of 2-3 weeks. All patients had undergone surgery, had a recurrent tumor and had already been treated with chemo-radiotherapy or chemotherapy with CDDP + 5-FU. Response evaluation in 10 patients with measurable disease: partial response 4 patients, stable disease 2 patients and progressive disease 4 patients. The main NCI-CT grade 3/4 toxicity was leukopenia (8/10). Mild to moderate nausea (> or = grade 2) occurred in 3/10 patients.     

Phase I evaluation of continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion followed by weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in combination with a fixed systemic administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were treated with escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel as a 60 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, along with a fixed dose of continuous 5-FU infused over 5 days. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received combination therapy at four dose levels of weekly Taxol, ranging from 60 to 90 mg/m2/week. Dose-limiting toxicities > grade 3 were observed at the 90 mg/m2/week dose level. Toxicities included anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and alopecia. Two episodes of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in two of the three patients receiving this dose. At each dose level, pharmacological studies documented the persistence of significant serum paclitaxel levels over 24 h after drug administration. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for this regimen was 90 mg/m2/week of paclitaxel for 3 weeks plus 600 mg/m2/day of continuous 5-FU for 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of weekly paclitaxel and 5-FU demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and feasible pharmacokinetic results suggesting its practical applicability. Based on these findings, the recommended dose and schedule for phase II study of combination chemotherapy is paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week x 3 over 4 weeks, and continuous 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day x 5 days every 4 weeks.     

Biweekly irinotecan or raltitrexed plus 6S-leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II-III randomized trial.

Purpose:The aim of this randomised trial was to evaluate theactivity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including 6S-leucovorin-modulated5-fluorouracil (LFA–5-FU), combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11 +LFA–5-FU) or raltitrexed (Tomudex®) (TOM + LFA–5-FU), inadvanced colorectal cancer patients, and to make a preliminary comparison ofboth these experimental regimens with a biweekly administration ofLFA–5-FU modulated by methotrexate (MTX + LFA–5-FU). Patients and methods:One hundred fifty-nine patients withadvanced colorectal carcinoma previously untreated for the metastatic disease(34 of them previously exposed to adjuvant 5-FU) were randomly allocated toreceive: CPT-11, 200 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA,250 mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 850 mg/m² s i.v. bolus(arm A); TOM, 3 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 1050 mg/m² i.v. bolus (armB); or MTX, 750 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250mg/m² i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 800 mg/m² i.v. bolus (armC). Courses were repeated every two weeks in all arms of the trial. Responserate (RR) was evaluated after every four courses. The sample size was definedto have an 80% power to detect a 35% RR for each experimentaltreatment, and to show a difference of at least 4% in RR with thestandard treatment if the true difference is 15% or more. Results:The RRs were: 34% (95% confidence interval(95% CI): 21%–48%) in arm A, including 3 completeresponses (CRs) and 15 partial responses (PRs), 24% (95% CI:14%–38%) in arm B, including 2 CRs and 11 PRs, and24% (95% CI: 14%–38%), with 2 CRs and 11PRs, in arm C. After a median follow-up time of 62 (range 18–108) weeks,the median time to progression was 38, 25, and 27 weeks for arm A, B, and C,respectively. With 94 patients still alive, the one-year probability ofsurvival was 61%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. WHO grade3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected 46% and 16%,respectively, of patients treated with CPT-11 + LFA–5-FU. Medianrelative dose intensity over eight cycles (DI₈) was 78% forCPT-11 and 82% for 5-FU. Severe toxicities of TOM + LFA–5-FU wereneutropenia (16%) and diarrhoea (16%), but median relativeDI₈ was 93% for TOM, and 82% for 5-FU. Conclusions:CPT-11 + LFA–5-FU compares favorably in termof activity and toxicity with other combination regimens including CPT-11 andcontinuous infusional 5-FU. The hypothesis of a RR 15% higher than theMTX + LFA–5-FU treatment can not be ruled out after this interimanalysis. The TOM + LFA–5-FU regimen showed a RR and a toxicity profilevery close to the MTX + LFA–5-FU combination, and dose not deservefurther evaluation in advanced colorectal cancer patients.     

A dose escalation study of leucovorin (LV) and 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in combination with cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vinorelbine (VNR) with fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (CPM) and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled. VNR was administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion (i.v.) on day 1 at escalated doses with CPM 300 mg/m2 i.v. bolus and LV 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour i.v. infusion, followed by 5-FU 1500 mg/m2 as a 22-hour continuous infusion (c.i.) for two consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. RESULTS: At the dose of VNR 22.5 mg/m2 without rhG-CSF and 25 mg/m2 with rhG-CSF support, the DLT had been reached. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in six (33%) patients and in fourteen (27%) cycles with no episode of febrile neutropenia. One (5.5%) patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 neurotoxicity occurred in two patients and grade 2 and 3 asthenia in five (28%). CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are 20 mg/m2 for VNR (22.5 mg/m2 with rhG-CSF support) and 300 mg/m2 for CPM on day 1, with 500 mg/m2 for LV and 1500 mg/m2 for 5-FU on days 1 and 2.     

Carboplatin (CBDCA), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitoxantrone (DHAD): an effective and well tolerated regimen for metastatic breast cancer.

Fifty-five women with metastatic breast cancer were treated with carboplatin (CBDCA), 55 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, daily for 3 days, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 900 mg/m2, (max. dose 1,500 mg/day in 24-h infusion (Travenol system) daily for 3 days, and mitoxantrone (DHAD) 8 mg/m2, i.v. bolus on day 1. Cycles were administered every 5 weeks. Objective responses were observed in 25 (44%) patients (95% confidence interval: 28%-60%) with a median duration of remission of 11.5+ months (range 6.5(+)-31+). Toxicity was mild. These results reflect the fact that combination of CBDCA, 5-FU and DHAD is effective and very well tolerated as an outpatient regimen.     

Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the patient's preference for oral UFT/leucovorin (LV) or intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and to compare 5-FU exposure with these two treatment options. A total of 37 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomised to start treatment with either oral UFT 300 mg/m2/day plus oral LV 90 mg/day for 28 days every 5 weeks or i.v. 5-FU 425 mg/m2/day plus LV 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. For the second treatment cycle, patients were crossed-over to the alternative treatment regimen. Prior to the first and after the second therapy cycle, patients were required to complete a therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU were determined by taking blood samples on days 8, 15 or 22 and 28 for UFT and on days 1 and 5 for i.v. 5-FU. 36 patients were eligible. 84% of the patients preferred oral UFT over i.v. 5-FU. After having experienced both treatment modalities, patients indicated taking the medication at home, less stomatitis and diarrhoea, and pill over injection as the most important reasons for their preference. The area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) for 5-FU after UFT administration was 113 microM x min on day 8, 114 on day 15 and 98 on day 28; the peak levels (Cmax) were 1.2, 1.3 and 1.0 microM, respectively. The AUC for the 5-FU/LV courses was 3083 microM x min for day 1 and 3809 for day 5 (P=0.002). The Cmax was 170.1 and 196.2 microM (P=0.06) and the clearance 2.6 and 1.9 l/min, respectively (P=0.002). Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer clearly preferred oral over i.v. chemotherapy treatment. This choice was most importantly influenced by convenience and toxicity considerations. Although i.v. bolus 5-FU leads to higher peak 5-FU concentrations and AUC values compared with oral UFT, this pharmacokinetic advantage of i.v. 5-FU seems to translate mainly into higher toxicity as seen in large randomised studies comparing oral UFT/LV with i.v. 5-FU/LV. Oral UFT/LV compares favourably with i.v. 5-FU/LV in terms of toxicity and patient's preference and leads to prolonged 5-FU exposure, which is comparable to continuous i.v. 5-FU treatment.     

Docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil in locally recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II multicenter study

This phase II study evaluated docetaxel-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in locally recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts--those previously treated with chemotherapy and those nonpretreated--that received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (day 1) plus 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day (days 1-5 every 3 weeks). Of 63 patients entered, 20 (31.7%) were pretreated and 43 (68.3%) were nonpretreated. Fifty-nine patients (93.7%) had received prior radiotherapy. After inclusion of 20 patients, the 5-FU dose was reduced to 750 mg/m2/day due to unacceptable toxicity. The overall response rate (ORR) was 20.6% on radiologic review (22.2%, investigator assessment). Pretreated patients achieved an ORR of 25.0% versus 18.6% for nonpretreated patients. This unexpected finding was partly attributed to differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Overall major grade 3 to 4 toxicities comprised neutropenia (66.6%), febrile neutropenia (31.7%), and mucositis (31.7%). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were lower at the reduced 5-FU dose (750 mg/m2/day): Febrile neutropenia declined from 40.0% to 27.9%; mucositis declined from 55.0% to 20.9%. Three treatment-related deaths occurred (2 with 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day, 1 with 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day). Docetaxel-5-FU appears active in locally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN with acceptable toxicity at the dose of 5-FU 750 mg/m2.     

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil with methotrexate and low-dose N-(phosphon-acetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA) is inactive in advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of biochemical modulation by PALA and methotrexate on the therapeutic activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Patients and methods: The treatment protocol consisted of phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA) 250 mg/m² i.v. 15-minute infusion followed by methotrexate 200 mg/m² i.v. 30-minute infusion on day 1 and 5-FU 600 mg/m² i.v. push on day 2. Folinic acid was given at 15 mg/m² p.o. every six hours for eight doses, starting 24 hours after methotrexate infusion. Cycles were repeated every two weeks.Results: Thirty patients with advanced chemotherapy-naive pancreatic cancer were included; 26 had measurable disease. Median age 56 years (27–72); median PS 1 (0–2). One PR (3.9%) was achieved; nine patients had stable disease. Median time to progression was 91 days. Median survival was 177 days and one year survival was 13.3% (4 of 30 patients). Treatment was well tolerated; diarrhea WHO grade 2 or 3 occurred in six patients; stomatitis WHO grade 2 and 3 in nine patients.Conclusions: Modulation of 5-FU by PALA and MTX given in this dose and schedule appears to be ineffective in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.     

Twelve weeks of protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) is as effective as 6 months of bolus 5-FU and folinic acid as adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer

We performed a multicentre randomised trial to compare the efficacy and toxicity of 12 weeks of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) delivered by protracted intravenous infusion (PVI 5-FU) against the standard bolus regimen of 5-FU and folinic acid (5-FU/FA) given for 6 months as adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer. A total of 716 patients with curatively resected Dukes' B or C colorectal cancer were randomised to 5-FU/FA (5-FU 425 mg m(-2) i.v. and FA 20 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 months) or to PVI 5-FU alone (300 mg m(-2) day for 12 weeks). With a median follow-up of 19.8 months, 133 relapses and 77 deaths have been observed. Overall survival did not differ significantly (log rank P=0.764) between patients receiving 5-FU/FA and PVI 5-FU (3-year survival 83.2 vs 87.9%, respectively). Patients in the 5-FU/FA group had significantly worse relapse-free survival (RFS, log rank P=0.023) compared to those receiving PVI 5-FU (3-year RFS, 68.6 vs 80%, respectively). Grades 3-4 neutropenia, diarrhoea, stomatitis and severe alopecia were significantly less (P<0.0001) and global quality of life scores significantly better (P&<0.001) for patients in the PVI 5-FU treatment arm. In conclusion, infused 5-FU given over 12 weeks resulted in similar survival to bolus 5-FU and FA over a 6 month period, but with significantly less toxicity.     

Combination chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin (ADM), cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP) and mitomycin C (MMC) (FAP.MMC) in advanced gastric cancer

Twenty patients with advanced gastric cancer were treated with FAP.MMC (5-FU 350 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-3, ADM 40 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, CDDP 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-3, MMC 6 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1), administering 5-FU, ADM and CDDP every 4 weeks and MMC every 8 weeks. Fourteen patients were evaluable for responses. Four (29%) partial responses and two minor responses were observed. The median duration of partial response was 3.8 months (range 2.5-7 months). The median overall survival time was 5 months (range 1.5-15 months). Leukopenia was relatively severe, with a median WBC nadir of 1,300/mm3. Nausea and vomiting were frequent but moderate. However, these toxicities were clinically manageable. FAP.MMC was thus considered effective for advanced gastric cancer.     

A phase I study of weekly docetaxel, 24-hour infusion of high-dose fluorouracil/leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of both docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered weekly in a regimen of docetaxel, 5-FU/leucovorin and cisplatin (DFLP) for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients with chemo-naive, advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were enrolled in the study. Cisplatin and leucovorin dosages were fixed throughout the study at 30 and 300 mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU dosage was fixed at 1,600 mg/m2 while docetaxel was evaluated at weekly 1-hour infusion dosages of 30, 40 and 50 mg/m2 to determine the MTD. Cisplatin, 5-FU and leucovorin were administered together as a 24-hour continuous infusion following docetaxel. Weekly 5-FU dosages of 1,600, 2,000 and 2,400 mg/m2 were then evaluated after setting the docetaxel dosage at the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 95 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of three cycles per patient. The MTD of docetaxel was defined at 40 mg/m2. At a docetaxel dosage of 50 mg/m2 per week, the dose-limiting events of grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 hypomagnesemia occurred. With fixation of docetaxel to 40 mg/m2, the DLT for 5-FU was found at 2,400 mg/m2 per week. This incurred grade 4 neutropenia such that the MTD of 5-FU was defined at 2,000 mg/m2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (45%), with 2 patients developing febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 and 3 hypomagnesemia and hypokalemia occurred in 9 (41%) and 4 (18%) patients, respectively, of the first 22 patients treated with a 24-hour infusion of cisplatin and 5-FU/leucovorin immediately following docetaxel. Following a change in the cisplatin administration schedule to a 3-hour infusion after 5-FU/leucovorin infusion, no such complications were observed in 9 subsequently treated patients. Grade 2 diarrhea was recorded in 11 patients (35%). Grade 2/3 asthenia occurred in 9 patients (30%), which resolved after correction of electrolyte disorders. Twenty-six patients were assessable for response analysis. There were 2 (7.8%) complete and 14 (53.8%) partial responses, with the overall response rate being 61.5% (95% confidence interval, 41.5-81.6%). Responses were observed at all dose levels. CONCLUSION: Two consecutive weeks of DFLP infusions every 3 weeks appear to be an active regimen with a tolerable toxicity profile in advanced gastric cancer. For further phase II studies, the recommended dose for this combination is 40 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 2,000 mg/m2 of 5-FU per week.     

A Phase I pharmacokinetic and biological correlative study of oblimersen sodium (genasense, g3139), an antisense oligonucleotide to the bcl-2 mRNA, and of docetaxel in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering oblimersen sodium, a phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide directed to the Bcl-2 mRNA, with docetaxel to patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer; to characterize the pertinent pharmacokinetic parameters, Bcl-2 protein inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cell(s) (PBMC) and tumor; and to seek preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were treated with increasing doses of oblimersen sodium administered by continuous i.v. infusion on days 1 to 6 and docetaxel administered i.v. over 1 h on day 6 every 3 weeks. Plasma was sampled to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of both oblimersen and docetaxel, and Bcl-2 protein expression was measured from paired collections of PBMCs pretreatment and post-treatment. RESULTS: Twenty patients received 124 courses of the oblimersen and docetaxel combination at doses ranging from 5 to 7 mg/kg/day oblimersen and 60 to 100 mg/m(2) docetaxel. The rate of severe fatigue accompanied by severe neutropenia was unacceptably high at doses exceeding 7 mg/kg/day oblimersen and 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Nausea, vomiting, and fever were common, but rarely severe. Oblimersen mean steady-state concentrations were 3.44 +/- 1.31 and 5.32 +/- 2.34 at the 5- and 7-mg/kg dose levels, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen responses were observed in 7 of 12 taxane-na?ve patients, but in taxane-refractory patients no responses were observed. Preliminary evaluation of Bcl-2 expression in diagnostic tumor specimens was not predictive of response to this therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended Phase II doses for oblimersen and docetaxel on this schedule are 7 mg/kg/day continuous i.v. infusion days 1 to 6, and 75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 6, respectively, once every 3 weeks. The absence of severe toxicities at this recommended dose, evidence of Bcl-2 protein inhibition in PBMC and tumor tissue, and encouraging antitumor activity in HPRC patients warrant further clinical evaluation of this combination.     

A phase II trial of palliative docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil for squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck

Purpose:A phase II study to determine the response rate andtoxicity of docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) every four weeks (TF), inpatients with incurable SCCHN. Patients and methods:Patients with metastatic or recurrent SCCHNwith an ECOG PS <3 were enrolled in an institutional review board approvedtrial. Prior induction or adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted provided sixmonths had elapsed.The regimen was docetaxel 70 mg/m² i.v., day 1 and 5-FU 800mg/m²/d × 5 days, days 1–5, as a continuous intravenousinfusion, repeated every 28 days. Planned intra-patient dose modificationswere based on hematological, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal toxicities.Patients were removed from the study for progression of disease orunacceptable toxicity. Results:Seventeen patients were enrolled. Fourty-six cycles ofTF were administered. Reasons for discontinuance of TF included: progressivedisease, 12 patients; toxicity, 3 patients; concomitant illness, 1 patient;death, 1 patient.The most common toxicities were neutropenia, mucositis, anemia, fatigue,alopecia, pain, diarrhea and nausea. Evaluation of responses to TF showed thatthere were four patients of seventeen (24%, 95% exact CI:6.8–49.9) who achieved a PR or CR. Accrual was terminated after interimanalysis of the response rate of the first 17 patients failed to exceed 4 of17. Conclusions:The response rate to TF in patients with SCCHN waslower than expected. Trials of other regimens should take precedence overfurther exploration of the TF regimen.