Limited arthrodesis for the rheumatoid wrist

Limited arthrodesis of the proximal carpal row to the radius, synovectomy of the extensor tendons and the wrist joint, and a Darrach procedure were carried out in 25 unstable painful rheumatoid wrists that had ulnar shift and/or palmar subluxation of the carpus. The average follow-up period after the operation was 3 years. Satisfactory results were obtained with relief of pain, improved forearm rotation, and increased grip strength. The average degree of extension and flexion was reduced, respectively, 70% and 54% at follow-up compared with the preoperative range. Postoperative x-ray films showed deterioration in the lunocapitate joint in 12 wrists; however, the wrists remained stable and painless.     

Partial arthrodesis for the rheumatoid wrist

The correct treatment of wrist deformation in the patient who has rheumatoid arthritis has a major impact on the preservation of function of the hand. Surgical decisions should be individualized, based on the patient's needs and the future development of deformation. Partial wrist arthrodesis in rheumatoid wrists is an excellent tool to preserve stability and functional mobility in the long term. In cases of severe destruction complete wrist fusion should be considered alternatively.     

Combined radiocarpal arthrodesis and midcarpal (lunocapitate) arthroplasty for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist

Arthroplasties for the wrist with rheumatoid arthritis are usually revised for the articulation between radius and carpus. The midcarpal joint is disregarded although it remains structurally better preserved and is therefore better suited for the preservation of stable motion. When the midcarpal surfaces are satisfactory, a radio-scapho-lunate fusion, accompanied by a midcarpal synovectomy, is an excellent procedure. When the midcarpal surfaces, particularly the head of the capitate, are also destroyed, the tendency has been to either perform a pan-arthrodesis, or to insert a wrist endo-prosthesis. For these severely unstable and destroyed wrists, a stabilization of the radiocarpal joint by arthrodesis, combined with preservation of motion at the midcarpal level by resection of the damaged head of the capitate and its replacement with a small implant has been done. This procedure has allowed all patients to retain a functional range of motion and to experience satisfactory relief of pain.     

Implant arthroplasty of the rheumatoid wrist

Implant arthroplasty of the rheumatoid wrist is indicated for relief of pain in those patients with advanced destruction of the joint. Two types of implant arthroplasty are useful in selected cases: silicone interpositional arthroplasty and total wrist replacement.     

Median nerve compression complicating arthrodesis of the rheumatoid wrist

The frequency and pathogenesis of median nerve compression complicating the Rush pin method of fusing the rheumatoid wrist was evaluated retrospectively. This complication was encountered in 14/50 wrists (28%). In 7 hands the carpal tunnel was explored, mostly within 2 weeks after fusion. In addition to signs of acute entrapment of the median nerve the most constant finding was that the volar edge of the resected distal end of the radius was prominent and projected into the bottom of the carpal tunnel caused by too vigorous correction of the subluxed carpus. Obviously the median nerve was squeezed or angulated at the volar edge of the radius. After median nerve release and resection of the bony prominence all patients regained full sensibility within the period of observation (in average 2.5 years). It is concluded that this mechanism of nerve entrapment should be realized when fusion of a severely destructed rheumatoid wrist is considered.     

Functional and patient-reported outcome of partial wrist denervation versus the Mannerfelt wrist arthrodesis in the rheumatoid wrist

Introduction

Wrist arthrodesis offers high success rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, loss of residual mobility may cause unnecessary disability. This makes wrist denervation an appealing alternative. However, there is a distinct lack of patient-reported outcome measure studies comparing these two procedures. The aim of this study was to report any change in function, pain and satisfaction following wrist arthrodesis compared to denervation in a single surgeon series of rheumatoid patients.

Patients and methods

The results of 16 wrist arthrodesis in 15 patients and 14 partial (PIN) wrist denervations in 13 patients were compared with a mean follow-up period of 39 and 22 months, respectively. The primary outcome measures were the same for both groups and included the validated patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire and a satisfaction questionnaire.

Results

Wrist arthrodesis significantly improved the mean total pain and functional outcome scores by 54 and 36 %, respectively, at the time of follow-up. Wrist denervation patients also reported significant improvements of 44 and 42 % in total pain and functional outcomes, respectively; 87 % reported being very satisfied with their wrist arthrodesis procedure compared to 78 % in the denervation group. No statistically significant difference in response between the groups was observed in this series of patients.

Conclusions

Both procedures enjoyed favourable results amongst patients with excellent satisfaction outcomes. PIN denervation is a simple procedure with low complication rates and we therefore consider it a valid alternative to more difficult treatment options, such as partial or total wrist arthrodesis.     

A comparison of plate and pin fixation for arthrodesis of the rheumatoid wrist

This retrospective study compared plate fixation versus pin fixation in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent wrist arthrodesis. Fixation was achieved by using plates in 32 patients and longitudinal pins in 25 patients. Clinical follow-up averaged 29 months (range: 12-57 months) and radiographic follow-up averaged 16 months (range 12-39 months). Union occurred in 97% of the wrists fixed with plates and in 96% of the wrists fixed with pins. There were 6 (19%) complications in the plate group and 7 (28%) complications in the pin group. Three (12%) wrists fixed with pins moved from the immediate postoperative position to a position of relative volar flexion, while radiographs showed no changes in wrist position in the plate group. With both methods, successful arthrodesis stabilized the wrist in a high percentage of patients. Plate fixation offers an excellent alternative method for arthrodesis of the rheumatoid wrist.     

Partial wrist arthrodesis versus arthroplasty for distal radius giant cell tumours

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of using the proximal fibular graft for partial wrist arthrodesis or arthroplasty after the resection of giant cell tumours of the distal radius.

Methods

Between February 2006 and August 2010, 14 patients (seven males, seven females; average age, 35.7 years) with grade II and III giant cell tumours of the distal radius were treated by tumour resection and autologous proximal fibular grafts to reconstruct the wrist in our hospital. Seven patients each were treated by wrist arthroplasty and partial wrist arthrodesis, and were followed up for 2.2–6.8 years (average, 3.9 years).

Results

All patients achieved primary healing. No tumour recurrence was observed during follow-up in any of the patients. No statistically significant difference in forearm rotation was observed between patients undergoing the two different treatments. However, wrist flexion-extension activities were significantly better and the wrist grip strengths were significantly worse in the arthroplasty group than in the arthrodesis group. The Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusions

Overall, joint arthroplasty remains a favourable treatment with regard to the functional outcome for giant cell tumours of the distal radius; however, some of these patients may have a weaker grip strength. In comparison, partial wrist fusion appears to provide a durable and stable wrist with good long-term functional outcome.     

Results of Mannerfelt wrist arthrodesis for rheumatoid arthritis in relation to the position of the fused wrist

Purpose

The wrist is involved early in rheumatoid arthritis and is often severely affected. A stable wrist is crucial to good hand function, which often necessitates a fusion. One of the most commonly used techniques in rheumatoid patients is the Mannerfelt arthrodesis. In this retrospective study the outcome and the patient’s subjective satisfaction are presented and compared to other techniques. Also the influence of the position of the wrist following a fusion procedure is analysed.

Methods

Thirty-four wrists were retrospectively analysed using radiological measurements, functional scores such as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and a pain assessment. The objective function of the hand with the fused wrist was assessed.

Results

In 92.6 % of wrists the patients rated their satisfaction as good or excellent. The mean DASH score post-operatively was 63.3. Of the wrists, 17 were fixed in a median flexed position of 13° and 17 wrists in a median extended position of 8°. There was no statistically significant correlation between the position of the wrist and the satisfaction or objective function. The rate of fusion was 94.1 %.

Conclusions

The Mannerfelt arthrodesis achieves good results and provides a high rate of satisfaction and pain relief in our study. It has major advantages compared to other wrist fusion techniques in the rheumatoid patient. We could not show clear statistical evidence for better results in either a flexed or an extended position, but the ratings of the patients indicated better subjective results with a slightly extended position of the arthrodesis.     

Long-term functional results of wrist arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of wrist fusion on the relief of pain and also the functional capacities of the upper limbs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Eighteen patients were assessed at a mean of 7 years after wrist arthrodesis and a mean of 17 years after the onset of RA. Radiological measurements, pain assessment and impairment rating of the upper limbs were made of the fused and non-fused sides. The average position of arthrodesis was 8 degrees of extension and 9 degrees of ulnar deviation. All patients were pleased with the procedure and had satisfactory pain relief. Impairment ratings did not detect any significant difference in the sensory and motor function of the hand when the fused and non-fused groups were compared. We conclude that in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, wrist arthrodesis is a reliable procedure that provides predictable pain relief and a high degree of satisfaction without additional functional loss in the upper limb.     

Preliminary results of total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis using the Trispherical total wrist arthroplasty

Thirty-two patients underwent 38 arthroplasties for advanced rheumatoid arthritis and marked soft tissue losses. Seven wrists required repair or transfer of at least one tendon for rebalancing. All patients were improved by the implants. Thirty-four of the 38 patients were improved beyond the functional level of a painless wrist arthrodesis. Overall, there were 23 excellent, 10 good, 3 fair, and 2 poor results. The average wrist score was 90.3 points, and the average arc of motion was 38 degrees. There were three cases of migration of the third metacarpal stem and nine cases of lucency about the stems, three of which were progressive or greater than 1 mm. There were no deep infections. There was one reoperation for persistent pain and one for component loosening. There were no cases of implant failure. These results indicate that this total wrist arthroplasty is a safe, reproducible procedure for radiographic class III and IV rheumatoid disease and should be considered a first line of therapy for that group.     

Technique of intramedullary fixation for arthrodesis of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis.

We did 18 arthrodeses of the wrist in 16 patients with rheumatoid arthritis using an intramedullary fixation technique. There were 15 women and one man, whose ages at operation ranged from 47 to 71 years (mean 58). Follow up ranged from 13 to 68 months (mean 27). The operative technique consists of a combination of intramedullary placement of two Kirschner (K)-wires and an autogenous bone graft. At follow up bony union was apparent in all cases. K-wires came out of the metacarpal joints in two cases. Paraesthesiae in the median nerve distribution occurred in two cases which both recovered within three months.     

Trispherical total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis

Thirty-four patients, with 35 trispherical total wrist arthroplasties for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, were evaluated at an average follow-up of 9 years (range, 5 to 11 years). The average preoperative score was 25 points inasmuch as all patients had severe pain and loss of function. The average postoperative score improved to 87 points since 30 wrists were free of pain. Twenty-eight wrists rated as a good-to-excellent result. The average arc of flexion and extension improved from 35 to 50 degrees. There were no deep infections or dislocations. Two wrists required revision, one for loosening and one for persistent pain, both requiring removal of the implant and arthrodesis. Postoperative tendon attrition occurred in six wrists, all of which had preoperative tendon ruptures necessitating tendon transfer. Radiographs showed radiolucencies in seven wrists, including seven around the metacarpal stem and one around the radial stem. The optimum results were achieved in those patients with intact extensor tendons before operation.     

Swanson implant arthroplasty of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis

Sixty rheumatoid wrists operated with Swanson implant arthroplasty were evaluated after a mean observation time of thirty-three months. Grip function in daily living improved in 60%, pain decreased in 88%, range of motion increased in 83% and grip strength increased in 69% of operated wrists. Significantly impaired function was found in wrists with implant fracture (12%) and in cases with pronounced bone resorption around the implant (23%). Ulnar deviation and carpal collapse were commonly found but did not impair the function significantly. In seven patients the contralateral wrist had been fused and was compared to the arthroplasty. The merits and indications of arthroplasty are discussed.