Pleiotropic effects of statins in the diseases of the liver

Statins are a class of molecules that inhibit HMG Co A reductase. They are usually prescribed as a lipid lowering medication. However, there is accumulating evidence that statins have multiple secondary effects both related and unrelated to their lipid-lowering effect. This narrative review of the literature aims to provide the reader with information from clinical studies related to the effect of statin and statins' potential use in patients with liver diseases. In patients with advanced liver disease due to any etiology, statins exhibit an antifibrotic effect possibly through the prevention of hepatic sinusoidal microthrombosis. Two randomized controlled trials confirmed that statins decrease hepatic vein pressure gradient in patients with portal hypertension and improve the survival of patients after variceal bleeding. Lower rates of infections were observed in patients with cirrhosis who received statin treatment. Statins decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in patients with advanced liver disease in general but particularly in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Statins in patients with chronic hepatitis C likely increase the virological response to the treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin and have the potential to decrease the rate of fibrosis. Finally, data from randomized controlled trials also confirmed that the addition of statin prolongs the survival of patients with advanced HCC even more than sorafenib. Statins are a very promising group of drugs especially in patients with liver disease, where therapeutic options can often be limited. Some indications, such as the prevention of re-bleeding from esophageal varices and the palliative treatment of HCC have been proven through randomized controlled trials, while additional indications still need to be confirmed through prospective studies.     

Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin do not prevent thioacetamide induced liver cirrhosis in rats

AIM:To examine whether the administration of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin would prevent experimentallyinduced hepatic cirrhosis in rats.METHODS:Liver cirrhosis was induced by injections of thioacetamide(TAA).Rats were treated concurrently with TAA alone or TAA and either atorvastatin(1,10 and 20 mg/kg) or rosuvastatin(1,2.5,5,10 and 20 mg/kg) given daily by nasogastric gavage.RESULTS:Liver fibrosis and hepatic hydroxyproline content,in the TAA-treated group was significantly higher than those of the controls [11.5 ± 3.2 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 mg/g protein(P = 0.02)].There were no differences in serum aminotransferase levels in the TAA controls compared to all the groups treated concomitantly by statins.Both statins used in our study did not prevent liver fibrosis or reduce portal hypertension,and had no effect on hepatic oxidative stress.Accordingly,the hepatic level of malondialdehyde was not lower in those groups treated by TAA + statins compared to TAA only.In vitro studies,using the BrdU method have shown that atorvastatin had no effect of hepatic stellate cells proliferation.Nevertheless,statin treatment was not associated with worsening of liver damage,portal hypertension or survival rate.CONCLUSION:Atorvastatin or rosuvastatin did not inhibit TAA-induced liver cirrhosis or oxidative stress in rats.Whether statins may have therapeutic applications in hepatic fibrosis due to other etiologies deserve further investigation.     

Comparing the effects of five different statins on the HDL subpopulation profiles of coronary heart disease patients

We compared the effects of five different statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin) on the lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I-containing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subpopulation profiles of 86 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. Patients with established CHD, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (C)>130 mg/dl, and triglyceride (TG)<400 mg/dl, were treated with atorvastatin 20, 40, and 80 mg/day and one of the other four statins at 20, 40, and when available 80 mg/day in increasing doses (4 weeks of each dose) in a randomized crossover fashion. There was an 8-week placebo controlled washout period between different drug treatments. All five statins on each dose resulted in significant reductions in total- and LDL-C compared to placebo treatment. There were also decreases in plasma TG and increases in HDL-C and apoA-I concentrations, but not all treatments changed these parameters significantly. Each statin except fluvastatin improved the HDL subpopulation profile by increasing the concentrations of the large, cholesterol-rich, LpA-I alpha-1 and prealpha-1 HDL subpopulations. CHD patients have significantly lower concentration of the large, LpA-I alpha-1 HDL particles compared to controls. Our data indicate that statins which are the most effective in lowering LDL-C and TG are also the most effective agents in modifying the HDL subpopulation profile in CHD patients towards the patterns found in healthy individuals. The order of efficacy of statins in increasing alpha-1 HDL subpopulation was: atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin.     

Safety of aggressive lipid management

Data from recent clinical trials of high- versus moderate-dose statin therapy support the recommendation to achieve a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <100 mg/dl in high-risk patients and reveal that many patients will require a high-dose statin to achieve this goal. Overall, low rates of serious musculoskeletal (<0.6%) and hepatic (<1.3%) toxicity have been observed with high-dose statin therapy. In the long-term trials, atorvastatin 80 mg had higher rates of persistent transaminase elevations but rates of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis similar to lower doses of statins. The rate of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis for simvastatin 80 mg, although still low, was about 4x higher than for atorvastatin 80 mg and lower doses of statin. A similar margin of safety would be expected in properly selected patients with characteristics similar to those who participated in the clinical trials. High-dose statin therapy or combination therapy will be required for the large majority of very high-risk patients to achieve the optional LDL goal of <70 mg/dl. While the combination of ezetimibe, bile-acid sequestering agents, niacin, and fenofibrate with moderate dose statins appears to be reasonably safe, the long-term safety of combination with high-dose statins remains to be established. In order to optimize patient outcomes, clinicians should be aware of specific patient characteristics, such as advancing age, gender, body mass index, or glomerular filtration rate, which predict muscle and hepatic statin toxicity.     

Safety of aggressive lipid management.

Data from recent clinical trials of high- versus moderate-dose statin therapy support the recommendation to achieve a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <100 mg/dl in high-risk patients and reveal that many patients will require a high-dose statin to achieve this goal. Overall, low rates of serious musculoskeletal (<0.6%) and hepatic (<1.3%) toxicity have been observed with high-dose statin therapy. In the long-term trials, atorvastatin 80 mg had higher rates of persistent transaminase elevations but rates of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis similar to lower doses of statins. The rate of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis for simvastatin 80 mg, although still low, was about 4x higher than for atorvastatin 80 mg and lower doses of statin. A similar margin of safety would be expected in properly selected patients with characteristics similar to those who participated in the clinical trials. High-dose statin therapy or combination therapy will be required for the large majority of very high-risk patients to achieve the optional LDL goal of <70 mg/dl. While the combination of ezetimibe, bile-acid sequestering agents, niacin, and fenofibrate with moderate dose statins appears to be reasonably safe, the long-term safety of combination with high-dose statins remains to be established. In order to optimize patient outcomes, clinicians should be aware of specific patient characteristics, such as advancing age, gender, body mass index, or glomerular filtration rate, which predict muscle and hepatic statin toxicity.     

Comparisons of effects of statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) on fasting and postprandial lipoproteins in patients with coronary heart disease versus control subjects

The effects of atorvastatin at 20, 40, and 80 mg/day on plasma lipoprotein subspecies were examined in a randomized, placebo-controlled fashion over 36 weeks in 97 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of >130 mg/dl and compared directly with the effects of fluvastatin (n = 28), pravastatin (n = 22), lovastatin (n = 24), and simvastatin (n = 25). The effects of placebo and 40 mg/day of each statin were also examined in subjects with CHD with subjects in the fasting state and in the fed state 4 hours after a meal rich in saturated fat and cholesterol and compared with results in age- and gender-matched control subjects. At all doses tested in the fasting and fed states, atorvastatin was significantly (p <0.01) more effective in lowering LDL cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol than all other statins, and significantly (p <0.05) more effective than all statins, except for simvastatin, in lowering triglyceride and remnant lipoprotein (RLP) cholesterol. At 40 mg/day in the fasting state, atorvastatin was significantly (p <0.01) more effective than all statins, except for lovastatin and simvastatin, in lowering cholesterol levels in small LDL, and was significantly (p <0.05) more effective than all statins, except for simvastatin, in increasing cholesterol in large HDL and in lowering LDL particle numbers. Our data indicate that atorvastatin was the most effective statin tested in lowering cholesterol in LDL, non-HDL, and RLP in the fasting and fed states, and getting patients with CHD to established goals, with fluvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin having about 33%, 50%, 60%, and 85% of the efficacy of atorvastatin, respectively, at the same dose in the same patients.     

Use of statins in patients with liver disease

Opinion statement  Cardiovascular disease is as common in individuals with chronic liver disease as in the general population. Moreover, recent data suggest that patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may have a cardiovascular risk greater than that conferred by the conventional risk factors. There is unequivocal evidence that cardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in this patient population and thus requires consideration of aggressive therapy with lipid-lowering agents such as statins. Because all statins are hepatically cleared and can cause elevations in liver biochemistries, there is a concern that patients with underlying liver disease may be at increased risk for hepatotoxicity. However, recent data, along with an assessment of statin safety by the Liver Expert Panel, suggest that statins are generally well tolerated in patients with chronic liver disease such as NAFLD, primary biliary cirrhosis, and hepatitis C virus. These drugs also appear to be safe in patients with stable/compensated cirrhosis. However, decompensated cirrhosis and acute liver failure should be considered contraindications for lipid-lowering therapy as these patients are unlikely to benefit because of their generally grave prognosis. Although routine hepatic biochemical test monitoring is recommended, the cost-effectiveness of this approach has been questioned. The benefit of statins in patients with underlying liver disease who are otherwise important candidates for statin therapy far outweighs the risk of a very rare event of serious liver injury.     

Simvastatin enhances hepatic nitric oxide production and decreases the hepatic vascular tone in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In cirrhosis, an insufficient release of nitric oxide contributes to increased hepatic resistance and portal pressure and enhances the postprandial increase in portal pressure. We hypothesized that simvastatin, which enhances Akt-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation, may increase hepatic nitric oxide release and decrease hepatic resistance in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. METHODS: In protocol 1, 13 patients had measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, hepatic blood flow, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and nitric oxide products before and 30 and 60 minutes after 40 mg of simvastatin. In protocol 2, 17 patients were randomized to receive placebo or simvastatin (40 mg) 12 hours and 1 hour before the study. After baseline measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, hepatic blood flow, and nitric oxide products, a standard liquid meal was given, and measurements were repeated at 15, 30, and 45 minutes. RESULTS: In protocol 1, acute simvastatin did not modify the hepatic venous pressure gradient but increased the hepatic blood flow (21% +/- 13% at 30 minutes; P = 0.01) and decreased hepatic sinusoidal resistance by 14% +/- 11% (P = 0.04). Nitric oxide product levels significantly increased in hepatic venous blood (from 31.4 +/- 12.3 nmol. mL(-1) to 35.8 +/- 10.7 nmol. mL(-1); P = 0.04), but not in peripheral blood. Systemic hemodynamics were not modified. In protocol 2, simvastatin pretreatment significantly attenuated the postprandial increase in hepatic venous pressure gradient (mean peak increase, 10% +/- 9% vs. 21% +/- 6% in placebo; P = 0.01). Hepatic blood flow increased similarly in the 2 groups. Hepatic nitric oxide products increased in the simvastatin group but not in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin administration increases the hepatosplanchnic output of nitric oxide products and decreases hepatic resistance in patients with cirrhosis.     

Statins: the Panacea of Cirrhosis?

Cirrhosis and portal hypertension are associated with intrahepatic endothelial dysfunction, which creates a proinflammatory and profibrotic environment and increases hepatic resistance and portal pressure. Statins have shown to improve the liver endothelial dysfunction and decrease the portal pressure in preclinical models of cirrhosis. In humans, they have shown anti-inflmatory and antifibrotic effects in the liver. This suggests that statins can target several pathogenic events in cirrhosis and have potential to improve the prognosis in these patients. This needs further evaluation in adequately designed randomized trials with clinical endpoints.     

Statins: effective antiatherosclerotic therapy

BACKGROUND: Statins are the most effective agents currently available for lowering plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and are the mainstay of therapy for hyperlipidemia. The statins are highly liver-selective, inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, a key enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol. Several large, controlled clinical trials have confirmed significant reductions in rates of coronary heart disease morbidity and death with long-term statin therapy in patients with mild to severe hypercholesterolemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: This review article is based on a literature search of more than 60 relevant articles from peer-reviewed journals. Search engines included Medline and Embase. In surveying clinical and angiographic evidence, we found that statins appear to reduce the incidence of coronary events by slowing the progression of atherosclerosis and preventing atheromatous lesion formation. We found that the 6 statins currently marketed-atorvastatin, cerivastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin-differ in their inhibitory action on the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme. CONCLUSIONS: The use of more potent statins such as atorvastatin and simvastatin affords greater lowering of LDL-C and triglyceride levels, allowing more patients to achieve target goals. The question of how low LDL-C levels should be lowered will be answered by ongoing clinical trials.     

Statin Use in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Statins reduce cardiovascular risk. Patients with cirrhosis have decreased hepatic clearance of statins and potentially increased risk for complications. No studies assess mortality in patients with biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis.

Aim

Compare mortality in patients with cirrhosis on statins to those not on statins.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients from 1988 to 2011 at Partners Healthcare Hospitals. The Partners Research Patient Data Registry identified patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis on statins at biopsy and at least 3 months following. Controls were matched 1:2 by age, gender and Child–Pugh class. Decompensation was defined as ascites, jaundice/bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL, and/or hepatic encephalopathy or variceal hemorrhage. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcome was decompensation in baseline-compensated patients. Chi-square and two-way ANOVA testing compared groups. Cox proportional hazards models for mortality controlled for age, Child–Pugh class, diabetes, coronary artery disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Kaplan–Meier curves graphed mortality.

Results

Eighty-one statin users and 162 controls were included. Median follow-up: 36 months in statin users and 30 months in controls. 70.4 % of patients were Child–Pugh A. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), albumin, varices and beta-blocker use were not significantly different between groups. Statin users had lower mortality on multivariate analysis (HR 0.53, p = 0.01), and Child–Pugh A patients had longer survival on Kaplan–Meier analysis. Cox multivariate analysis for decompensation showed lower risk of decompensation with statins while increased decompensation with low albumin, high MELD score and beta-blocker use.

Conclusions

In patients with cirrhosis, statin therapy is not associated with increased mortality and may delay decompensation.     

Evolution of care in cirrhosis: Preventing hepatic decompensation through pharmacotherapy

Cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, impacting more than 120 million people worldwide. Although geographic differences exist, etiologic factors such as alcohol use disorder, chronic viral hepatitis infections, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are prevalent in nearly every region. Historically, significant effort has been devoted to modifying these risks to prevent disease progression. Nevertheless, more than 11% of patients with compensated cirrhosis experience hepatic decompensation each year. This transition signifies the most important prognostic factor in the natural history of the disease, corresponding to a decline in median survival to below 2 years. Over the past decade, the need for pharmacotherapies aimed at reducing the risk for hepatic decompensation has been emphasized, and non-selective beta-blockers have emerged as the most effective option to date. However, a critical therapeutic gap still exists, and additional therapies have been proposed, including statins, rifaximin, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Based on the results of innovative retrospective analyses and small-scale prospective trials, these pharmacotherapies represent promising options, but further studies, including randomized controlled trials, are necessary before they can be incorporated into clinical use. This report highlights the potential impact of these agents and others in preventing hepatic decompensation and discusses how this paradigm shift may pave the way for guideline-directed medical therapy in cirrhosis.     

Managing the underestimated risk of statin-associated myopathy

In clinical practice 5-10% of patients receiving statins develop myopathy, a side effect that had been systematically underestimated in the randomized controlled trials with statins. The most common manifestation of myopathy is muscle pain (usually symmetrical, involving proximal muscles) without creatinine kinase (CK) elevation or less frequently with mild CK elevation. Clinically significant rhabdomyolysis (muscle symptoms with CK elevation >10 times the upper limit of normal and with creatinine elevation) is extremely rare. Myopathy complicates the use of all statins (class effect) and is dose-dependent. The pathophysiologic mechanism of statin-associated myopathy is unknown and probably multifactorial. The risk of statin-associated myopathy can be minimized by identifying vulnerable patients (i.e. patients with impaired renal or liver function, advanced age, hypothyroidism, etc.) and/or by eliminating-avoiding statin interactions with specific drugs (cytochrome P-450 3A4 inhibitors, gemfibrozil, etc.). In symptomatic patients, the severity of symptoms, the magnitude of CK elevation and the risk/benefit ratio of statin continuation should be considered before statin treatment is discontinued. Potential strategies are the use of the same statin at a lower dose and if symptoms recur the initiation of fluvastatin XL 80 mg daily or rosuvastatin intermittently in low dose (5-10mg), combined usually with ezetimibe 10mg daily. Failure of these approaches necessitates the use of non-statin lipid lowering drugs (ezetimibe, colesevelam). In order to provide evidence based recommendations for the appropriate management of statin-intolerant patients we need randomized clinical trials directly comparing the myopathic potential of different lipid-lowering medications at comparable doses.     

Current and future pharmacological therapies for managing cirrhosis and its complications

Due to the restrictions of liver transplantation,complication-guided pharmacological therapy has become the mainstay of long-term management of cirrhosis.This article aims to provide a complete overview of pharmacotherapy options that may be commenced in the outpatient setting which are available for managing cirrhosis and its complications,together with discussion of current controversies and potential future directions.PubMed/Medline/Cochrane Library were electronically searched up to December 2018 to identify studies evaluating safety,efficacy and therapeutic mechanisms of pharmacological agents in cirrhotic adults and animal models of cirrhosis.Non-selective betablockers effectively reduce variceal re-bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients with moderate/large varices,but appear ineffective for primary prevention of variceal development and may compromise renal function and haemodynamic stability in advanced decompensation.Recent observational studies suggest protective,haemodynamically-independent effects of beta-blockers relating to reduced bacterial translocation.The gut-selective antibiotic rifaximin is effective for secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy;recent small trials also indicate its potential superiority to norfloxacin for secondary prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.Diuretics remain the mainstay of uncomplicated ascites treatment,and early trials suggest alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists may improve diuretic response in refractory ascites.Vaptans have not demonstrated clinical effectiveness in treating refractory ascites and may cause detrimental complications.Despite initial hepatotoxicity concerns,safety of statin administration has been demonstrated in compensated cirrhosis.Furthermore,statins are suggested to have protective effects upon fibrosis progression,decompensation and mortality.Evidence as to whether proton pump inhibitors cause gut-liver-brain axis dysfunction is conflicting.Emerging evidence indicates that anticoagulation therapy reduces incidence and increases recanalisation rates of non-malignant portal vein thrombosis,and may impede hepatic fibrogenesis and decompensation.Pharmacotherapy for cirrhosis should be implemented in accordance with up-to-date guidelines and in conjunction with aetiology management,nutritional optimisation and patient education.     

Statins, inflammation and kidney disease

Inflammation is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is consistently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinical event rates increase with declining renal function and activation of the acute-phase response. Statins are potent anti-inflammatory drugs that reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. Owing to the increased prevalence of inflammation in patients with CKD and the potent effect of statins in individuals with elevated levels of C-reactive protein, these drugs should be especially effective in patients with CKD. Whereas data indicate that pravastatin may prevent loss of kidney function to a greater extent in individuals with evidence of increased inflammation than in those who show no inflammation, two large, randomized statin trials in patients on hemodialysis found no benefit of statin therapy, neither in the whole study group nor after stratifying for inflammation. Irrespective of inflammation, guidelines recommend treatment of dyslipidemia in early stages of CKD, which is supported by results from recent meta-analyses, and the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP), a large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.     

Hochdosierte Statintherapie für kardiovaskuläre Risikopatienten

Lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins decreases cardiovascular risk; therefore LDL-C is the primary target in lipid therapy. The amount of risk reduction is the greater, the lower the LDL-C values achieved by statin therapy are. Current guidelines therefore require an LDL-C as low as < 70 mg/dl in patients who are at a very high risk of cardiovascular events. This stringent treatment goal depending on the baseline LDL-C values typically can only be obtained with higher doses of potent statins. Randomised trials demonstrate the efficacy of high-dose therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day with regard to the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients after acute coronary syndromes (PROVE-IT TIMI 22 trial), in patients with stable coronary artery disease (TNT trial), and in patients after stroke or TIA (SPARCL trial). Moreover, potent statin treatment reduces the progression of coronary atherosclerosis (REVERSAL and ASTEROID trials). Furthermore, large meta-analyses of the efficacy of high-dose statin therapy confirm its safety; in particular, muscle-related adverse events are not more frequent than with standard statin doses. It is recommended that evidence-based statin doses be used in clinical practice; the dosages used in clinical trials should be given rather than titrating patients to LDL-C targets by increasing statin doses in a stepwise manner. Whether the strong LDL-C lowering combination of simvastatin plus ezetimibe will reduce cardiovascular events over and above simvastatin monotherapy is currently being tested in the ongoing IMPROVE-IT trial. Importantly, despite the large body of evidence in favour of high-dose statin therapy for patients at high cardiovascular risk, high-dose statin therapy is still underused and LDL-C goals are still not met in the majority of these patients.     

Simvastatin treatment improves liver sinusoidal endothelial dysfunction in CCl4 cirrhotic rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sinusoidal endothelial dysfunction with decreased nitric oxide (NO) production contributes to increased hepatic resistance in cirrhosis. Statins improve endothelial dysfunction in peripheral vasculature. This study was designed to characterize the hemodynamic and molecular effects of statins in cirrhotic rats. METHODS: Systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics were evaluated in CCl(4) ascitic cirrhotic rats treated with placebo or simvastatin (25 mg/kg/day, for 3 days), at baseline and after volume expansion. Vascular responses of liver vasculature were evaluated after isolation and perfusion of the liver. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline hemodynamics in rats treated with simvastatin or placebo. However, in rats treated with simvastatin the increase in portal pressure induced by volume expansion was significantly attenuated. In isolated and perfused cirrhotic livers simvastatin pre-treatment significantly attenuated the pressure response to methoxamine, and significantly improved paradoxical vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine. These effects were not observed in the presence of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. Simvastatin increased eNOS expression, Akt-dependent eNOS phosphorylation and cGMP liver content. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of simvastatin might constitute a new way to selectively increase NO availability in the cirrhotic liver circulation and, therefore improve the vascular disturbances that contribute to portal hypertension.     

Comparison of effects of high (80 mg) versus low (20 mg) dose of simvastatin on C-reactive protein and lipoproteins in patients with angiographic evidence of coronary arterial narrowing

Although previous studies have demonstrated that various "statins" decrease levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), the dose-response relation for lowering hs-CRP by the clinically important drug simvastatin compared with lipid lowering is unclear. A 16-week, randomized, double-blind study was performed in patients with stable coronary artery disease and high hs-CRP levels (>3 mg/L). Subjects were randomized to placebo, 20 mg of simvastatin, or 80 mg of simvastatin for 12 weeks. Those currently on a statin first underwent a 4-week washout. Of the 107 total patients randomized, 96 completed the trial, and 89 were able to be evaluated for efficacy. Changes in hs-CRP differed across simvastatin and placebo groups (change score +1.6 vs -0.6 mg/L, p = 0.004), but no dose response was observed when comparing 80 with 20 mg/day (-0.6 vs -0.5 mg/L, respectively). A strong dose response was observed for changes in total (p <0.01) and low-density lipoprotein (p <0.001) cholesterol. hs-CRP changes did not correlate with low-density lipoprotein changes. In conclusion, this randomized trial in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease showed a strong dose response for simvastatin for total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering but not for hs-CRP.