A critical review of the neurophysiological evidence underlying clinical vestibular testing using sound,vibration and galvanic stimuli

In addition to activating cochlear receptors, air conducted sound (ACS) and bone conducted vibration (BCV) activate vestibular otolithic receptors, as shown by neurophysiological evidence from animal studies – evidence which is the foundation for using ACS and BCV for clinical vestibular testing by means of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). Recent research is elaborating the specificity of ACS and BCV on vestibular receptors. The evidence that saccular afferents can be activated by ACS has been mistakenly interpreted as showing that ACS only activates saccular afferents. That is not correct – ACS activates both saccular and utricular afferents, just as BCV activates both saccular and utricular afferents, although the patterns of activation for ACS and BCV do not appear to be identical. The otolithic input to sternocleidomastoid muscle appears to originate predominantly from the saccular macula. The otolithic input to the inferior oblique appears to originate predominantly from the utricular macula. Galvanic stimulation by surface electrodes on the mastoids very generally activates afferents from all vestibular sense organs. This review summarizes the physiological results, the potential artifacts and errors of logic in this area, reconciles apparent disagreements in this field. The neurophysiological results on BCV have led to a new clinical test of utricular function – the n10 of the oVEMP. The cVEMP tests saccular function while the oVEMP tests utricular function.     

Cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in acute vestibular neuritis

ObjectivesTo clarify the origin and afferent pathways of short-latency ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) in response to air-conducted sound (ACS), we evaluated cervical (cVEMP) and ocular VEMPs in patients with vestibular neuritis (VN).MethodsIn response to air-conducted tone burst, the oVEMP and cVEMP were measured in 60 healthy controls and in 41 patients with acute VN. The VN selectively involved the superior vestibular nerve (superior VN) in 30 patients, affected the inferior vestibular nerve only (inferior VN) in three and damaged both superior and inferior vestibular nerve branches in eight.ResultsAll 30 patients with superior VN presented normal cVEMPs, indicating preservation of the saccular receptors and their afferents in the inferior vestibular nerve. However, the oVEMP was abnormal in all patients with superior VN. By contrast, the patients with inferior VN showed normal oVEMP and abnormal cVEMP.ConclusionThese dissociations in the abnormalities of cVEMP and oVEMP in patients with VN selectively involving the superior or inferior vestibular nerve suggest that the origin of the vestibular nerve afferents of oVEMP differ from those of cVEMP.SignificanceThe oVEMP in response to ACS may be mediated by the superior vestibular nerve, probably due to an activation of the utricular receptors.     

Cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular neuritis: comparison between air- and bone-conducted stimulation

To clarify the changes of cervical (cVEMP) and ocular (oVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air-conducted sound (ACS) and bone-conducted vibration (BCV) in patients with vestibular neuritis (VN), patients with VN (n = 30) and normal controls (n = 45) underwent recording of cVEMP and oVEMP in response to ACS (1,000 Hz, 5 ms, tone bursts) and BCV (500 Hz, short tone burst). Patients with VN showed a high proportion of oVEMP abnormalities in response to both ACS (80.0 %) and BCV at the forehead (Fz, 73.3 %) or the mastoid (76.7 %). In contrast, cVEMPs were mostly normal with both ACS and BCV in the patients. The dissociations in the abnormalities of cVEMP and oVEMP induced by ACS and BCV at the mastoids and at the forehead in patients with VN suggest that oVEMP reflects functions of the superior vestibular nerve and most likely the utricular function. The results of our study suggest that oVEMP induced by either ACS or BCV appears to depend on integrity of the superior vestibular nerve, possibly due to the utricular afferents travelling in it. In contrast, cVEMP elicited by either ACS or BCV may reflect function of the saccular afferents running in the inferior vestibular nerve.     

Feasibility of the simultaneous ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in unilateral vestibular hypofunction

ObjectiveThis study compared the results of combined and individual ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) and cervical VEMP (cVEMP) tests in healthy subjects and patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction to confirm the effectiveness of the combined oVEMP and cVEMP test.MethodsTwenty healthy volunteers and 12 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction underwent individual oVEMP and cVEMP tests in a random order, and combined oVEMP and cVEMP test on another day.ResultsTwenty healthy subjects had 100% response rates for oVEMPs and cVEMPs in both individual and combined stimulation modes. Significant positive correlations exist between individual and combined oVEMPs/cVEMPs in terms of latencies and amplitudes. In 12 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction, differences in abnormal percentages of oVEMPs or cVEMPs were non-significant. Additionally, the characteristic parameters of oVEMP/cVEMP among ears of healthy subjects, good and pathological ears of patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction did not differ significantly, regardless of whether the individual or combined mode was used.ConclusionsThe combined oVEMP and cVEMP test generates similar information to that obtained by individual mode, regardless of whether subjects are healthy or have unilateral vestibular hypofunction.SignificanceSimultaneous oVEMP and cVEMP tests may be a convenient screening tool for assessing crossed vestibulo-ocular reflex and ipsilateral sacculo-collic reflex, which definitely shortens the diagnostic test time. Thus, it may favor the large diffusion of these techniques.     

Recovery of ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials after treatment of inner ear diseases

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the clinical value of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) for monitoring the rehabilitation of vestibular function in patients treated for peripheral vertigo.

Materials and methods: Fifteen patients who had been diagnosed with peripheral vertigo and showed no VEMP response on the affected side but exhibited symptom alleviation and VEMP responses after therapies were retrospectively enrolled. We analyzed the restoration and parameters of their VEMP response.

Results: After treatment, six patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss showed VEMP recovery, including two with both oVEMP and cVEMP recovery, three with oVEMP recovery only, and one with cVEMP recovery only. Two patients with Meniere’s disease (MD) showed cVEMP recovery, while the other three MD patients showed oVEMP recovery. Three patients with herpes zoster oticus exhibited cVEMP recovery. One patient with vestibular neuritis exhibited cVEMP recovery. Among the patients with cVEMP and/or oVEMP restoration, most patients presented normal VEMP parameters; however, some patients showed abnormal VEMP parameters after treatment.

Conclusion: Combined oVEMP and cVEMP are objective tools for assessing vestibular otolithic end organ function during dynamic functional recovery from vestibular diseases.     

Why do oVEMPs become larger when you look up? Explaining the effect of gaze elevation on the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential

ObjectivesThe ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) is a vestibular reflex recorded from the inferior oblique (IO) muscles, which increases in amplitude during eye elevation. We investigated whether this effect of gaze elevation could be explained by movement of the IO closer to the recording electrode.MethodsWe compared oVEMPs recorded with different gaze elevations to those recorded with constant gaze position but electrodes placed at increasing distance from the eyes. oVEMPs were recorded in ten healthy subjects using bursts of skull vibration.ResultsoVEMP amplitude decreased more with decreasing gaze elevation (9 μV from 24° up to neutral) than with increasing electrode distance (2.7 μV from baseline to 6.4 mm; P < 0.005). The oVEMP recorded with gaze 24° down had delayed latency (by 4.5 ms).ConclusionThe effect of gaze elevation on the oVEMP cannot be explained by changes in position of the muscle alone and is likely mainly due to increased tonic contraction of the IO muscle in up-gaze. The oVEMP recorded in down-gaze (when the IO is inactivated, but the IR activated) likely originates in the adjacent IR muscle.SignificanceOur results suggest that oVEMP amplitudes in extraocular muscles scale in response to changing tonic muscle activity.     

The effect of alcohol on cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in healthy volunteers

ObjectiveWe investigated the effect of alcohol on the cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs). As alcohol produces gaze-evoked nystagmus (GEN), we also tested the effect of nystagmus independent of alcohol by recording oVEMPs during optokinetic stimulation (OKS).MethodsThe effect of alcohol was tested in 14 subjects over multiple rounds of alcohol consumption up to a maximum breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) of 1.5‰ (mean 0.97‰). The effect of OKS was tested in 11 subjects at 5, 10 and 15 deg/sec.ResultsoVEMP amplitude decreased from baseline to the highest BrAC level by 27% (range 5–50%, P < 0.001), but there was no significant effect on oVEMP latency or cVEMP amplitude or latency. There was a significant negative effect of OKS on oVEMP amplitude (16%, P = 0.006).ConclusionsWe found a selective effect of alcohol on oVEMP amplitude, but no effect on the cVEMP. Vertical nystagmus elicited by OKS reduced oVEMP amplitude.SignificanceAlcohol selectively affects oVEMP amplitude. Despite the effects of alcohol and nystagmus, both reflexes were reliably recorded in all subjects and conditions. An absent response in a patient affected by alcohol or nystagmus indicates a vestibular deficit.     

Ocular and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to bone conducted vibration in Ménière’s disease during quiescence vs during acute attacks

ObjectiveTwo indicators of otolithic function were used to measure dynamic otolith function in the same patients both during an acute attack of Ménière’s disease (MD) and in the quiescent period between attacks.MethodsThe early negative component (n10) of the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (the oVEMP) to brief 500 Hz bone conducted vibration (BCV) stimulation of the forehead, in the midline at the hairline (Fz) was recorded by surface EMG electrodes just beneath both eyes while the patient looked up. It has been proposed that the n10 component of the oVEMP to 500 Hz Fz BCV indicates utricular function. It has been proposed that the early positive component (p13) of the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (the cVEMP) recorded by surface electrodes on both tensed SCM neck muscles to 500 Hz Fz BCV indicates saccular function.ResultsSixteen healthy control subjects tested on two occasions showed no detectable change in the symmetry of oVEMPs or cVEMPs to 500 Hz Fz BCV. In response to 500 Hz Fz BCV 15 early MD patients tested at both attack and quiescent phases showed a dissociation: there was a significant increase in contralesional of n10 of the oVEMP during the attack compared to quiescence but a significant decrease in the ipsilesional p13 of the cVEMP during the attack compared to quiescence.ConclusionsDuring an MD attack, dynamic utricular function in the affected ear as measured by the n10 of the oVEMP to 500 Hz Fz BCV is enhanced, whereas dynamic saccular function in the affected ear as measured by the p13 of the cVEMP to 500 Hz Fz BCV is not similarly affected.SignificanceThe MD attack appears to affect different otolithic regions differentially.     

Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) produced by impulsive transmastoid accelerations.

OBJECTIVE: Recent work has demonstrated the existence of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs), which likely reflect projections underlying the translational vestibular ocular reflex (TVOR). We examined extraocular muscle activity associated with impulsive acceleration of the head in the transmastoid plane. METHODS: Accelerometry was measured in 4 subjects in response to acceleration impulses produced by a gamma function delivered with a Minishaker (4810, Bruel & Kjaer). This stimulus produced peak head accelerations of 0.13-0.14 g occurring at between 3.1 and 4.0 ms at the mastoids for both right and left head movement. OVEMPs were recorded in 10 normal subjects with 5 directions of gaze, using electrode pairs placed lateral to, above and below the eyes. RESULTS: OVEMPs occurred at short latency, with initial peaks between 10.3 ms (p10) and 15.3 ms (n15). For a given recording site and gaze direction, the responses were determined solely by the direction of imposed acceleration. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that, given the transtemporal nature of the stimuli, utricular afferents are likely to be powerfully activated. The OVEMPs evoked may be generated by the lateral recti and oblique muscles. SIGNIFICANCE: Sudden lateral accelerations of the head evoke the translational VOR and ocular counter rolling reflex and the pattern of muscle activations indicated by the OVEMPs appear to be a manifestation of these reflexes.     

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are intact in cervical dystonia

Vestibular dysfunction has been reported in patients with cervical dystonia (CD), but it is still unclear whether the abnormalities occur as part of the CD syndrome or whether they arise from the abnormal posture and movement of the head. We compared vestibular‐evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) recorded from the affected neck muscles (i.e., cervical VEMPs) with those recorded from muscles unaffected by the dystonia, the extraocular muscles (i.e., ocular VEMPs). We compared 21 patients and age‐matched normal controls to investigate whether these short‐latency reflexes are altered in CD. We also measured subjective visual horizontal (SVH). Seven patients had not received botulinum toxin treatment (naïve group), 10 were receiving regular injections (treatment group), and four had previously received treatment but had developed antibodies (antibody group). Both cervical and ocular VEMPs were present in the majority of patients and controls. For both reflexes, there were no significant differences between stimulation of the two sides of the head, between the treatment groups, or between the patients and controls. There was also no difference in degree of deviation of SVH between the groups. Our results showed that VEMPs can be reliably recorded from both the neck and extraocular muscles in patients with CD, even after long disease or treatment durations, and provide evidence for intact short‐latency vestibular reflexes in CD. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society.     

Semicircular canal, saccular and utricular function in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy: analysis based on etiology

The diagnosis of bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) is typically established based on bilateral semicircular canal dysfunction. The degree to which both otolith organs—the saccule and utricle—are also impaired in BV is not well-established, particularly with respect to the etiology and severity of BV. The aim of this study was to evaluate semicircular canal, saccular and utricular function in patients with BV due to aminoglycoside ototoxicity and bilateral Menière’s disease, and with different severities of BV. Caloric and head impulse testing were used as measures of canal function. Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and ocular VEMPs (oVEMP) were used as measures of saccular and utricular function, respectively. We enrolled 34 patients with BV and 55 controls in a prospective case–control study. Patients with BV were less likely to have saccular (61 %) or utricular (64 %) dysfunction relative to canal dysfunction (100 %). Utricular function differed significantly between patients by etiologic group: the poorest function was found in patients with BV due to aminoglycoside toxicity, and the best function in Menière’s disease patients. Canal and saccular function did not vary according to etiology. Further, utricular but not saccular function was significantly correlated with canal function. Saccular and utricular function had the strongest association with Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores relative to canal function. These data suggest that when a patient with BV is identified in a clinical context, oVEMP testing is the most sensitive test in distinguishing between aminoglycoside toxicity and bilateral Menière’s disease. Both cVEMP and oVEMP testing may be considered to evaluate the functional impact on the patient.     

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in Bell’s palsy

The aim of the present study was to evaluate vestibular nerve involvement in patients with Bell’s palsy with ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP and cVEMP). Ten patients who were diagnosed with Bell’s palsy and ten healthy controls were included. All patients underwent VEMP recordings within 6 days after their initial presentation. Patients with Bell’s palsy had greater oVEMP asymmetry ratio comparing to healthy controls (?38.4 ± 28.7 % vs ?1.3 ± 19.3 %, p = 0.005). As well N10 latencies of the oVEMP response were prolonged comparing to healthy controls (11.575 vs 9.72 ms). There was no difference in cVEMP asymmetry ratio or latencies between groups. We found no correlation between House–Brackmann grading scale and oVEMP asymmetry ratio (r = 0.003, p = 0.994). There are three possible explanations for increased oVEMP amplitudes on the affected side: (1) oVEMP response on the ipsilateral eye could be contaminated by facial nerve activity (blink reflex); (2) the amplitude of N10-P33 could be affected through the stapedial reflex; and (3) increased oVEMP amplitude could be the consequence of the vestibular nerve dysfunction itself, with prolonged latencies of the N10 oVEMP further supporting this explanation. The results of this study indicate possible involvement of the superior branch of the vestibular nerve in patients with Bell’s palsy.     

Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation

ObjectiveTo determine the amplitude changes of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) recorded simultaneously from the neck (cVEMPs) and eyes (oVEMPs) in response to 500 Hz, 2 ms air-conducted sound pips over a 30 dB range.MethodsFifteen healthy volunteers (mean age 29, range 18–57 years old) and one patient with unilateral superior canal dehiscence (SCD) were studied. The stimulus was reduced in increments to 105 dB pSPL for the normals (81 dB pSPL for the SCD patient). A statistical criterion was used to detect responses.ResultsIpsilateral (i-p13/n23) and contralateral (c-n12/p24/n30) peaks for the cVEMP montage and contralateral (c-n10/p16/n21) and ipsilateral (i-n13) peaks for the oVEMP montage were present for the baseline intensity. For the lowest intensity, 6/15 subjects had responses for the i-p13 cVEMP potential and 4/15 had c-n10 oVEMP responses. The SCD patient showed larger responses for nearly all intensities. The cVEMP potentials were generally well fitted by a power law relationship, but the oVEMP c-n10, p16 and n21 potentials showed a significant increase in gradient for the higher intensities.ConclusionMost oVEMP and cVEMP responses follow a power law relationship but crossed oVEMP responses showed a change in gradient above a threshold.SignificanceThe pattern of response to AC stimulation may be a property of the pathways underlying the potentials.     

Vestibular dysfunction in patients with auditory neuropathy detected by vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine vestibular involvement in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) using ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), caloric tests, video Head Impulse Tests (vHIT), and Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) tests.MethodsTwenty-two patients with AN (study group) and 50 age-and-gender-matched healthy subjects (control group) were enrolled. All patients underwent air-conducted sound oVEMP and cVEMP tests. In the study group, 20 patients underwent a caloric test, 10 patients underwent a video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), and nine patients underwent the Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) test.ResultsSignificant differences in VEMP abnormalities were found between the two groups. Most AN patients showed no VEMP response, while only a few patients showed VEMP responses with normal parameters. Some AN patients presented abnormal VEMP parameters, including thresholds, latencies, and amplitudes. The abnormal rate (including no response and abnormal parameters) was 91% in the cVEMP test and 86% in the oVEMP test. No significant difference was found between oVEMP and cVEMP abnormalities. AN patients exhibited a 70% abnormal rate in the caloric test. Most AN patients showed normal VOR gains. Most patients showed no overt corrective saccades in vHIT, and exhibited normal anticompensatory saccades in the SHIMP test.ConclusionMany AN patients experience vestibular dysfunction, which may be detected by using a vestibular functional test battery.SignificanceVEMP abnormalities might reflect the status and degree of vestibular involvement in AN.     

Assessment of gentamicin-induced vestibulotoxicity by click and galvanic vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials: A guinea pig investigation

ObjectiveThe aim of this investigation carried out with guinea pigs was to study the possible effects of a gentamicin treatment on the saccular macula and on its afferent vestibular ganglion neurons.MethodsThe gentamicin-induced impairment was analyzed using vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) elicited by both click and galvanic vestibular stimulations (GVS). Fifty μl of saline or gentamicin solution (40 mg/ml) was dropped over the round window membrane of the right (control) and left (lesion) cochleae, respectively. Four weeks after surgery, the VEMPs elicited with clicks and GVS were evaluated for each animal. Then, the animals were sacrificed in order to perform morphological and anti-Nav1.8 immunocytochemical analyses.ResultsClick- and GVS-VEMPs were obtained in all of the controls, whereas no potentials were obtained from gentamicin-treated animals. Lesions of sensory cells were observed in the saccular macula. In the injured vestibular ganglion, the percentage of voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.8-like immunoreactive (Nav1.8-LI) neurons was significantly lower (38.9 ± 0.7) than that (53.6 ± 3.2) calculated in controls.ConclusionsGentamicin-induced impairments of the saccular macula and afferents of guinea pigs can be evaluated by recording both click- and GVS-VEMPs. Both tests provide information on the sacculo-collic reflex pathway and could help a clinical diagnosis of gentamicin intoxication by conventional eardrops in the patient with a perforated eardrum.     

Effect of betel nut chewing on the otolithic reflex system

Objective

This study investigated the effect of betel nut chewing on the otolithic reflex system.

Vestibular tests for rehabilitation: applications and interpretation

Vestibular function testing plays a critical role in understanding balance disorders. These tests augment a well-performed history and physical exam in providing quantitative information regarding vestibular reflexes, central oculomotor function and postural control strategies. Video-oculography (VOG) and caloric stimulation play a major role in evaluation of both peripheral vestibular and central oculomotor disorders. Rotational chair testing and, more recently the Dynamic Visual Acuity Test (DVAT) and Gaze Stabilization Test (GST) provide information regarding higher frequency vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function. Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP) explores the interaction of the vestibular, visual and proprioceptive systems for posture control. Finally, the cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) test and the Dynamic Subjective Visual Vertical (DSVV) test provide information regarding saccular and utricular function, respectively. New techniques and applications continue to provide knowledge both of disease processes and potential medical, surgical and rehabilitative interventions.     

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: test-retest reliability

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are myogenic responses induced by stimulation of the saccular macula by intense sound stimuli. The responses are recordable from the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles. We recorded VEMPs from normal subjects (up to three times in each subject) to identify: i) the best recording procedures, ii) the reliability, and iii) the normal limits for both individual point and test-retest evaluation. We adopted a recording setting in which the subjects were asked to simultaneously activate both SCM muscles by pushing their forehead against a load cell during a bilateral acoustic stimulation. This system enabled subjects to monitor their intensity of SCM activation and to keep intensity constant; us to record VEMPs from both sides simultaneously, and thus to minimize the duration of the recording session. For each subject we considered the mean and the difference (divided by the mean) of the values derived from the two SCM muscles of the latency of the P13 and N23 components and of the P13-N23 peak-to-peak amplitude. Reliability was evaluated by estimate of the intraclass correlation coefficient, and was good or excellent for all parameters, with the exception of the P13-N23 amplitude side-difference. To take advantage of all the data available, we computed the normal limits for both individual point and test-retest evaluation by means of the variability indices used for the evaluation of reliability. In this system, VEMP recording is simple, inexpensive and rapid. It is well tolerated by subjects, and easily implemented in laboratories equipped for evoked potential recording.     

Galvanic and acoustic vestibular stimulation activate different populations of vestibular afferents.

OBJECTIVE: To deduce whether similar or distinct populations of vestibular afferents are activated by acoustic and galvanic vestibular stimulation by comparing the effectiveness of 'matched' stimuli in eliciting vestibulospinal reflexes. METHODS: Twelve subjects (5 men, 7 women) underwent individual 'matching' of 2 ms tone burst and galvanic stimuli, using vestibulocollic reflexes so that corrected reflex amplitudes to tone burst and galvanic stimuli were within 10% of each other. These same intensities were then administered using 20 ms durations to determine whether they were equally effective in evoking vestibulospinal responses. RESULTS: Corrected reflex amplitudes for vestibulocollic responses to tone burst and galvanic stimulation were not significantly different for the right (P=0.45) or left (P=0.68) sides. All subjects had vestibulospinal responses to galvanic stimulation (average intensity 4.0 mA for both sides). The short latency (SL) and medium latency (ML) components of the vestibulospinal reflexes were larger after galvanic compared to tone burst stimulation in 11 of 12 subjects (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite evoking equal-sized vestibulocollic reflexes, there was a clear dissociation between the magnitude of tone burst and galvanic-induced vestibulospinal reflexes. Galvanic stimulation evoked SL and ML reflexes in all subjects. Tone burst stimuli evoked only small SL reflexes and, in most cases, no ML reflexes. Acoustically-evoked vestibulocollic reflexes are likely to be due to saccular excitation. The limited effectiveness of longer tone burst stimuli to evoke ML vestibulospinal reflexes suggests that saccular afferents have, at most, only a minor role in the production of these reflexes. We conclude that galvanic stimulation is more effective in eliciting vestibulospinal reflexes than tone burst stimulation, and that the two methods activate different populations of vestibular afferents.     

Asymmetries in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in chronic stroke survivors with spastic hypertonia: Evidence for a vestibulospinal role

Objective

Indirect evidence suggests that lateralized changes in motoneuron behavior post-stroke are potentially due to a depolarizing supraspinal drive to the motoneuron pool, but the pathways responsible are unknown. In this study, we assessed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in the neck muscles of hemispheric stroke survivors with contralesional spasticity to quantify the relative levels of vestibular drive to the spastic-paretic and contralateral motoneuron pools.

Methods

VEMPs were recorded from each sternocleidomastoid muscle in chronic stroke survivors. Side-to-side differences in cVEMP amplitude were calculated and expressed as an asymmetry ratio, a proxy for the relative amount of vestibular drive to each side.

Results

Spastic-paretic VEMPs were larger than contralateral VEMPs in 13/16 subjects. There was a strong positive relationship between the degree of asymmetry and the severity of spasticity in this subset of subjects. Remaining subjects had larger contralateral responses.

Conclusion

Vestibular drive to cervical motoneurons is asymmetric in spastic stroke survivors, supporting our hypothesis that there is an imbalance in descending vestibular drive to motoneuron pools post-stroke. We speculate this imbalance is a consequence of the unilateral disruption of inhibitory corticobulbar projections to the vestibular nuclei.

Significance

This study sheds new light on the underlying mechanisms of post-stroke spasticity.