Does Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Have Any Impact on the Outcome of Right-Side Hepatectomy for Klatskin Tumor?

Background and Aim

The clinical usefulness of portal vein embolization (PVE) for Klatskin tumor is not well established. The authors explored the change in liver volume and function before and after major hepatectomy and evaluated the effect of PVE.

Methods

Thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent right hepatectomy with an initial future liver remnant (FLR)?≤?30 % for Klatskin tumors at Seoul National University Hospital were included.

Results

Eleven patients underwent PVE, and eight patients received right trisectionectomy. PVE induced a mean FLR increase of 19.3 % after a mean of 15.8 days. At postoperative month 1, liver volume and liver hypertrophy ratio was comparable between PVE and no-PVE group. For patients with an initial FLR?≤?20 %, postoperative liver hypertrophy rate of PVE group was comparable to no-PVE group. Liver function tests were not affected by PVE or the initial FLR. Postoperative liver hypertrophy ratio was negatively correlated with the initial FLR (hypertrophy ratio (%)?=?326.7–0.4×initial FLR (ml), P?=?0.001). There was no severe PVE-related morbidity, and postoperative morbidity rate was comparable in PVE and no-PVE group.

Conclusion

The postoperative liver hypertrophy ratio, final liver volume, or liver function tests were not affected by PVE. Postoperative liver hypertrophy was related to the initial FLR.     

Usefulness of measuring hepatic functional volume using Technetium-99m galactosyl serum albumin scintigraphy in bile duct carcinoma: report of two cases

We report the usefulness of measuring functional liver volume in two patients undergoing hepatectomy. Case 1 involved a 47-year-old man with hepatitis B virus infection. The indocyanine green test retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) was 14%. Liver uptake ratio (LHL15) by technetium-99 m galactosyl human serum albumin (^99mTc-GSA) liver scintigraphy was 0.91. The patient displayed hilar bile duct carcinoma necessitating right hepatectomy. After preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE), future remnant liver volume became 54% and functional volume by ^99mTc-GSA became 79%. Although the permitted resected liver volume was lower than the liver volume, scheduled hepatectomy was performed following the results of functional liver volume. Case 2 involved a 75-year-old man with diabetes. ICGR15 was 27.4% and LHL15 was 0.87. The patient displayed bile duct carcinoma located in the upper bile duct with biliary obstruction in the right lateral sector. The right hepatectomy was scheduled. After PVE, future remnant volume became 68% and functional volume became 88%. Although ICGR15 was worse as 31%, planned hepatectomy was performed due to the results of functional volume. In the liver with biliary obstruction or portal embolization, functional liver volume is decreased more than morphological volume. Measurement of functional volume provides useful information for deciding operative indication.     

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy versus sequential transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization in staged hepatectomy for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized comparative study

BackgroundBoth portal vein embolization (PVE) and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) have merits and demerits when used in patients with unresectable liver cancers due to insufficient volumes in future liver remnant (FLR).MethodsThis study was a single-center, prospective randomized comparative study. Patients with the diagnosis of hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the 2 groups. The primary endpoints were tumor resection and three-year overall survival (OS) rates.ResultsBetween November 2014 to June 2016, 76 patients with unresectable HBV-related HCC due to inadequate volume of FLR were randomly assigned to ALPPS groups (n=38) and TACE + PVE groups (n=38). Thirty-seven patients (97.4%) in the ALPPS group compared with 25 patients (65.8%) in the TACE + PVE group were able to undergo staged hepatectomy (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI: 1.17–1.87, P<0.001). The three-year OS rate of the ALPPS group (65.8%) (95% CI: 50.7–80.9) was significantly better than the TACE + PVE group (42.1%) (95% CI: 26.4–57.8) (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26–0.98, two-sided P=0.036). However, no significant difference in the OS rates between patients who underwent tumor resection in the 2 groups of patients was found (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.35–1.83, two-sided P=0.595). Major postoperative complications rates after the stage-2 hepatectomy were 54.1% in the ALPPS group and 20.0% in the TACE + PVE group (risk ratio 2.70, 95% CI: 1.17–6.25, P=0.007).ConclusionsALPPS resulted in significantly better intermediate-term OS outcomes, at the expenses of a significantly higher perioperative morbidity rate compared with TACE + PVE in patients who had initially unresectable HBV-related HCC.     

Preoperative portal vein embolization with a combination of trisacryl microspheres,gelfoam and coils

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficiency of preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) with a combination of trisacryl microspheres, gelfoam and coils for inducing lobar hypertrophy in hepatobiliary malignancy patients.Materials and methodsPVE was performed by a percutaneous left approach in 63 patients with hepatic malignancy (hepatocarcinoma = 38, colorectal metastasis = 14, cholangiocarcinoma = 11). The indication of PVE and surgery was evaluated by hepatic tumor board take into consideration to the tumor extension and the hepatic volume on initial and post-embolization CT-scans. The total functional liver volume (TELV) and future liver remnant (FLR) volume were measured before and 24 ± 5 days after PVE to assess FLR, TELV and FLR/TELV ratios. Efficiency evaluation was based on FLR increase, the ability to perform the hepatectomy and the hepatic function after surgery. Safety evaluation was determined by clinical and biological follow-up after embolization and surgery.ResultsPVE was successful in all the patients. The mean FLR volume increases by 57 ± 56% after embolization (449 ± 180 cm³ to 663 ± 254cm³) (P < 0.0001). The FLR/TELV ratio increases by 11% after PVE (25 ± 8% to 36 ± 12%). Three minors’ complications were registered without impact on surgery, and four patients developed portal hypertension. Forty-nine patients underwent hepatectomy; none of them developed liver failure. Surgery was not performed in 14 patients due to tumor progression (n = 9), inadequate hypertrophy of FLR (n = 1) and portal hypertension (n = 4).ConclusionPreoperative PVE with a combination of trisacryl microspheres, gelfoam and coils is a safe and effective method for inducing contralateral hypertrophy before right hepatectomy in patients with advanced hepatobiliary malignancy.     

Percentage of Future Liver Remnant Volume Before Portal Vein Embolization Influences the Degree of Liver Regeneration After Hepatectomy

Background

Clinical determinants of liver regeneration induced by portal vein embolization (PVE) and hepatectomy remain unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate how liver regeneration occurs after PVE followed by hepatectomy and to determine which factors strongly promote liver regeneration.

Methods

Thirty-six patients who underwent both preoperative PVE and major hepatectomy were enrolled in this study. Percentage of future liver remnant volume before PVE (%FLR-pre) was compared with the remnant liver volume after PVE (%FLR-post-PVE) and on postoperative day 7 after hepatic resection (%FLR-post-HR). Clinical indicators contributing to liver regeneration induced by both PVE and hepatectomy were examined by logistic regression analysis.

Results

PVE and hepatectomy caused a two-step regeneration. FLR-pre, FLR-post-PVE, and FLR-post-HR were 448, 579, and 761 cm³, respectively. The %FLR-pre was significantly associated with liver regeneration induced by both PVE and hepatectomy (r?=?0.63, p?<?0.0001). Multiple regression analysis showed that only %FLR-pre was independently correlated with posthepatectomy liver regeneration (p?=?0.027, odds ratio?=?13.8).

Conclusion

After PVE and the subsequent hepatectomy, liver regeneration was accomplished in a two-step manner. Liver regeneration was strongly influenced by the %FLR-pre.     

Long-Term Survival and Disease Recurrence Following Portal Vein Embolisation Prior to Major Hepatectomy for Colorectal Metastases

Background  Portal vein embolisation (PVE) can be used to increase the remnant liver parenchyma volume before major hepatectomy but may stimulate tumour growth. The pattern of disease recurrence and long-term survival has not been adequately addressed. Methods  Over a period of 7 years 36 patients underwent preoperative PVE before resection of four or more liver segments for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. PVE was performed when the future liver remnant (FLR) assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan volumetry was less than 30%. Disease-free and overall survival was compared with a control group (65 patients) undergoing extended right/right hepatectomy for CRC metastases without PVE during the same time period. Results  PVE was successful in all patients. PVE increased the median FLR volume by 37% [295 ml (22%) to 404 ml (32%), p < 0.0001]. 61% of patients undergoing PVE proceeded to liver resection (n = 22). Twelve patients (33%) developed disease progression following PVE. The 5-year survival after liver resection with PVE was 25%, compared with 50% without PVE. The 5-year disease-free survival was 30% post PVE and 50% without PVE. Conclusion  We conclude that PVE significantly increases the future liver remnant. Only two-thirds of patients proceed to resection because of disease progression. Long-term survival is less than in patients who do not require PVE. The effect of PVE on tumour growth requires investigation. Presented at the 8th World Congress of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, February 2008 Mumbai, India, in Award Oral Paper Session.     

Changes in Splenic Volume during Liver Regeneration

Little is known about the relation between liver regeneration and splenic size. We monitored serial changes in liver and spleen volumes using computed tomography in 24 patients with biliary cancer who underwent right hepatectomy or more extensive liver resection following portal vein embolization (PVE). Nonembolized hepatic segments increased in volume from 316 ± 97 cm³ (34% ± 8% of total liver volume) before PVE to 410 ± 115 cm³ (44% ± 8%) after PVE. The volume of nonembolized hepatic segments (i.e., remnant liver) increased to 617 ± 111 cm³ (59% ± 10% of total liver volume before PVE) 14 days after hepatectomy and then increased slowly to reach 795 ± 231 cm³ (76% ± 16%) 1 year after hepatectomy. Splenic volume increased from 87 ± 29 cm³ before PVE to 104 ± 38 cm³ (119% ± 17% of original volume) after PVE. Splenic volume increased to 137 ± 65 cm³ (155% ± 40%) by 14 days after hepatectomy and to 155 ± 67 cm³ (179% ± 41%) by 28 days after hepatectomy, with no further change at 1 year after hepatectomy (153 ± 92 cm³; 174% ± 79%). The rate of increase in splenic volume within the first 14 days after hepatectomy was 2.7 ± 3.6 cm³/day, correlating well with increases in remnant liver volume (r = 0.64, p = 0.0006). These data indicate that the spleen is enlarged during liver regeneration, suggesting that the liver and spleen share certain common growth regulatory mechanisms.     

门静脉结扎与栓塞在肝切除术中应用的Meta分析

目的 系统评价门静脉结扎（PVL）和门静脉栓塞（PVE）后肝切除前剩余肝体积（FLR）增长率和其他围手术期结局指标。方法 检索相关数据库,收集关于PVL与PVE在肝切除术中应用的随机对照试验（RCT）或临床对照试验（CCT）,提取相关数据后,采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 最终纳入8项研究,共438例病人。Meta分析结果显示：PVE组与PVL组FLR增长率、术后病死率、肝功能衰竭和并发症等方面差异无统计学意义。然而,联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的二步肝切除术（ALPPS）较PVE能明显增加FLR。结论 PVL与PVE在肝切除术中有着相似的FLR增长率、术后病死率和并发症。ALPPS 相比PVE能明显加速FLR增长。     

肝静脉-门静脉联合栓塞术促进预留肝脏快速增生——结直肠癌肝转移转化切除新策略

目的 评价肝静脉-门静脉联合栓塞术（HVE+PVE）安全性、促进预留肝脏增生的能力及联合系统治疗用于初始不可切除结直肠癌肝转移（CRLM）转化切除的可行性。方法 回顾性分析2020年12月至2021年11月复旦大学附属中山医院3例肝左、右叶多发初始不可切除CRLM病例经系统治疗后,病灶缩小,但剩余肝体积（FLR）不足,行HVE+PVE后转化切除的临床资料。结果 HVE+PVE后平均18.6 d,FLR从平均423.6 mL增生至561 mL,平均增长率32.8%;剩余肝体积（FLR）/标准肝体积（SLV）从平均33.5%增至43.8%,无并发症发生。HVE+PVE后平均23 d行右半肝+左肝部分切除术等,平均出血333.3 mL,未输血。术后无Clavien-DindoⅢ级以上并发症,无肝功能衰竭及90 d死亡。均获得R0切除。平均11.3 d出院。结论 HVE+PVE通过介入操作即可使FLR快速增生,具有操作简捷、创伤小、安全等优点。联合系统治疗可以增加初始不可切除CRLM的转化切除率。     

Assessment of hepatic reserve for the indication of hepatic resection

The main goal of liver resection in patients with liver tumor is to cure the patients with the lowest operative risk. Based on our experiences, we report herein, indications of liver resection according to the nature of underlying liver parenchyma. In patients with normal underlying liver parenchyma, major resection does not require specific preoperative assessment. Non-tumorous biopsy is indicated in cases of massive steatosis and/or in patients in whom a complex technical procedure is anticipated. Portal vein embolization (PVE) is considered if the future liver remnant (FLR) is <30%. In patients with chronic liver disease, major hepatectomy is a risky situation, requiring specific preoperative assessment, including non-tumorous biopsy and PVE which could be associated with transarterial chemoembolization. Absence of hypertrophy of the FLR after PVE is a contraindication to a major hepatectomy. Intraoperative procedures in patients at risk require specific techniques, including intermittent clamping, anterior approach with hanging maneuver, and fixation on anatomical position of the remnant liver.     

Using 99mTc-DTPA galactosyl human serum albumin liver scintigraphy as a prognostic indicator in jaundice-free patients with biliary atresia

Background

We evaluated the clinical significance of follow-up data, including ^99mTc-DTPA galactosyl human serum albumin (^99mTc-GSA) liver scintigraphy data, as prognostic indicators for jaundice-free patients with biliary atresia (BA).

Sequential Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Portal Vein Embolization versus Portal Vein Embolization Only before Major Hepatectomy for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and portal vein embolization (PVE) prior to surgery in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and to compare the clinical outcome of the combined procedure with that of a matched group of patients undergoing PVE alone.

Patients and Methods

From 1997 to 2008, 135 patients with HCC underwent sequential TACE and PVE (n = 71) or PVE alone (n = 64) before right hepatectomy. PVE was performed mean 1.2 months after TACE. In both groups, computed tomography (CT) and liver volumetry were performed before and 2 weeks after PVE to assess degree of left lobe hypertrophy.

Results

Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were similar in the two groups. After PVE, the chronological changes of liver enzymes were similar in the two groups. The mean increase in percentage future liver remnant (FLR) volume was higher in the TACE + PVE group (7.3%) than in the PVE-only group (5.8%) (P = 0.035). After surgery, incidence of hepatic failure was higher in the PVE-only group (12%) than in the TACE + PVE (4%) group (P = 0.185). Overall (P = 0.028) and recurrence-free (P = 0.001) survival rates were significantly higher in the TACE + PVE group than in the PVE-only group.

Conclusion

Sequential TACE and PVE before surgery is a safe and effective method to increase the rate of hypertrophy of the FLR and leads to longer overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with HCC.     

�ž���������˨���ڸ��г�����Ӧ�õ�Meta����

??Portal vein ligation versus portal vein embolization for hepatectomy??A Meta-analysis SONG Wei??ZOU Shu-bing. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery??the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University??Nanchang 330000??China
Corresponding author??ZOU Shu-bing??E-mail??zousb999@163.com
Abstract Objective To systematically review the growth rate in future liver remnant (FLR) and perioperative outcomes after portal vein ligation (PVL) and portal vein embolization (PVE) before hepatectomy. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or clinical controlled trials (CCTs) on application of portal vein ligation versus portal vein embolization for staged hepatectomy. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 8 studies were included with a total of 438 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that??There was no difference in the increasement in FLR between PVE group versus PVL group??RR=6.04??95%CI??-0.23—12.32??P> 0.05). Similarly??there was no difference in the interval time??complications after PVE/PVL?? progression diseased after PVE/PVL??mortality??postoperative liver failure??morbidity and resectability in the two groups after hepatectomy. However??in a subset analysis comparing FLR with PVE and PVL??there was a significant increasement in FLR in favor of ALPPS??RR=30.14??95%CI??4.84—55.44??P< 0.05). Conclusion PVL and PVE for staged hepatectomy have a similar growth rate in FLR??mortality and morbidity rates in the hepatectomy. The ALPPS procedure results in an improved growth rate in FLR compared with PVE.     

Role of portal vein embolization in liver surgery: single centre experience in sixty-two patients

The extent of liver resection is limited by the residual functional reserve of the liver (FLR). The introduction of portal vein embolization (PVE), with the rationale of inducing hypertrophy of the FLR has significantly reduced morbidity and in particular the impact of postoperative liver failure (PLF). The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of PVE in patients candidates to liver resections with high risk of PLF. Between January 2006 and December 2009, 62 patients suffering from primary or metastatic liver tumour, underwent PVE at the Department of Surgery–Liver Unit HSR. CT assessment of hepatic volume was performed in each patient, prior and 4 weeks after the procedure. The outcome was evaluated in terms of feasibility of surgery, FLR growth [calculated as: (FLR after PVE ? FLR pre PVE) × 100/FLR pre PVE], morbidity and mortality associated with PVE and surgery. Of the 62 patients undergoing PVE, 6 (9.7%) did not benefit from surgery: of these, 4 showed spread of disease in the FLR at CT control, while in the remaining 2 adequate hypertrophy was not reached. The average volume of the FLR at the time of the procedure and after 4 weeks was 437.03 cc (±172.54) and 615.15 cc (± 187.49), respectively, with an average increase of 50.3% (±30.31). During the postoperative period, only 2 patients (3.2%) showed mild and transient signs of the PLF. The technique of PVE allows to performing, in an effective and safe way, major liver resections in patients with high risk of PLF.     

Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab Does Not Affect Liver Regeneration After Portal Vein Embolization in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Background  Blockage of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in murine models has been shown to impair liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (monoclonal antibody anti-VEGF) on liver regeneration after portal vein embolization (PVE) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases and its possible effect on postoperative outcome after major liver resection. Methods  Records of 65 consecutive patients treated with or without preoperative chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) and PVE for colorectal liver metastases from September 1995 to February 2007 were reviewed from a prospective database. Future liver remnant (FLR) volume, degree of FLR hypertrophy after PVE, morbidity, mortality, and survival were analyzed. Results  Preoperative PVE was performed after chemotherapy in 43 patients and without chemotherapy in 22 patients. Among the 43 patients treated with chemotherapy, 26 received concurrent bevacizumab. After a median of 4 weeks after PVE, there was no difference in FLR volume increase among patients treated with or without chemotherapy. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in degree of FLR hypertrophy among patients treated without (mean, 10.1%) or with chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab (8.8% and 6.8%) (P = .11). Forty-eight (74%) of 65 patients underwent extended right or right hepatectomy after PVE. No differences in morbidity and mortality were observed among patients treated with or without preoperative chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab). Conclusion  Preoperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab does not impair liver regeneration after PVE. Liver resection can be performed safely in patients treated with bevacizumab before PVE. Presented at The Society of Surgical Oncology, 61st Annual Cancer Symposium, Chicago, IL, March 13–16, 2008.     

Comparison of perfused volume segmentation between cone-beam CT and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT for treatment dosimetry before selective internal radiation therapy using 90Y-glass microspheres

PurposeTo compare the reliability and accuracy of the pre-treatment dosimetry predictions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) versus ^99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT for perfused volume segmentation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using ⁹⁰Y-glass microspheres.Materials and methodsFifteen patients (8 men, 7 women) with a mean age of 68.3 ± 10.5 (SD) years (range: 47–82 years) who underwent a total of 17 SIRT procedures using ⁹⁰Y-glass microspheres for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were retrospectively included. Pre-treatment dosimetry data were calculated from ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT using either CBCT or ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT to segment the perfused volumes. Post-treatment dosimetry data were calculated using ⁹⁰Y imaging (SPECT/CT or PET/CT). The whole liver, non-tumoral liver, and tumor volumes were segmented on CT or MRI data. The mean absorbed doses of the tumor (D_T), non-tumoral liver, perfused liver (D_PL) and perfused non-tumoral liver were calculated. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were investigated by calculating Lin's concordant correlation coefficients (ρ_c values). The differences (biases) between pre- and post-treatment dosimetry data were assessed using the modified Bland–Altman method (for non-normally distributed variables), and systematic bias was evaluated using Passing–Bablok regression.ResultsThe intra- and interobserver reliabilities were good-to-excellent (ρ_c: 0.80–0.99) for all measures using both methods. Compared with 90Y imaging, the median differences were 5.8 Gy (IQR: ?12.7; 16.1) and 5.6 Gy (IQR: ?13.6; 10.2) for D_PL-CBCT and D_PL-^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT, respectively. The median differences were 1.6 Gy (IQR: ?29; 7.53) and 9.8 Gy (IQR: ?28.4; 19.9) for D_T-CBCT and D_T-^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT respectively. Passing–Bablok regression analysis showed that both CBCT and ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT had proportional biases and thus tendencies to overestimate D_T and D_PL at higher post-treatment doses.ConclusionCBCT may be a reliable segmentation method, but it does not significantly increase the accuracy of dose prediction compared with that of ^99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT. At higher doses both methods tend to overestimate the doses to tumors and perfused livers.     

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome compromises liver regeneration in patients undergoing two-stage hepatectomy with portal vein embolization

Purpose

Several factors have been reported to affect liver regeneration after portal vein embolization (PVE); however, the effect of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) has not been evaluated. Therefore, we assessed the effect of SOS on liver regeneration after PVE in patients with multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases scheduled to undergo two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) combined with PVE.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 78 patients prospectively scheduled to undergo TSH between December 1996 and August 2009. Archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded nontumoral tissue samples were collected from the 1st- and 2nd-stage hepatectomies in 42 and 45 patients, respectively, and SOS and steatohepatitis were diagnosed pathologically. We analyzed the clinicopathological variables affecting liver regeneration after PVE.

Results

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was diagnosed in 11 (26.2%) and 20 patients (44.4%) at the time of the 1st- and 2nd-stage hepatectomy, respectively. Patients with SOS at the 1st-stage hepatectomy had a significantly lower hypertrophy ratio of the future remnant liver (FRL) after PVE than patients without SOS (16.8 ± 24.0 vs 55.6 ± 32.5; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SOS was an independent factor predicting lower FRL hypertrophy after PVE (??% FRL <20: hazard ratio 31.7, 95% confidence interval 2.84?C355.12; P = 0.005). The incidence of postoperative transient liver failure after the 2nd-stage hepatectomy in patients presenting with SOS was higher than that in those without SOS, but the difference did not reach significance (25.0% vs 4.0%; P = 0.052). Steatohepatitis was confirmed at the 1st- and 2nd-stage hepatectomy in 6 (14.3%) and 3 (6.7%) patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome inhibits FRL hypertrophy after PVE and induces postoperative liver failure. Therefore, an alternative strategy is needed to perform TSH safely in the presence of SOS.     

Laparoscopic hepatectomy reduces postoperative complications and hospital stay in overweight and obese patients

BACKGROUNDLaparoscopic liver surgery is currently considered the standard of care for various liver malignancies. However, studies focusing on perioperative outcome after laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in overweight patients are still sparse and its benefit compared to open hepatectomy (OH) is a matter of debate.AIMTo analyze postoperative outcomes in overweight [body mass index (BMI) over 25 kg/m²] and obese (BMI over 30 kg/m²) patients undergoing LH and compare postoperative outcome with patients undergoing OH.METHODSPerioperative data of 68 overweight (BMI over 25 kg/m²) including a subcohort of obese (BMI over 30 kg/m²) patients (n = 27) who underwent LH at our institution between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed regarding surgical outcome and compared to an equal number of patients undergoing OH. RESULTSThe mean BMI was 29.8 ± 4.9 kg/m² in the LH group and 29.7 ± 3.6 kg/m² in the OH group with major resections performed in 20.6% (LH) and 26.5% (OH) of cases, respectively. Operative time (194 ± 88 min vs 275 ± 131 min; P < 0.001) as well as intensive care (0.8 ± 0.7 d vs 1.1 ± 0.8 d; P = 0.031) and hospital stay (7.3 ± 3.6 d vs 15.7 ± 13.5 d; P < 0.001) were significant shorter in the LH group. Also, overall complications (20.6% vs 45.6%; P = 0.005) and major complications (1.5% vs 14.7%, P = 0.002) were observed less frequently after LH. An additional investigation analyzing the subgroup of obese patients who underwent LH (n = 27) and OH (n = 29) showed a shorter operative time (194 ± 81 min vs 260 ± 137 min; P = 0.009) and a reduced length of hospitalization (7.7 ± 4.3 d vs 17.2 ± 17 d; P < 0.001) but no difference in postoperative complications or overall cost.CONCLUSIONLH is safe and cost-effective in overweight and obese patients. Furthermore, LH is significantly associated with fewer postoperative complications and reduced hospital stay compared to OH in these patients.     

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization and Surgical Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Small Future Liver Remnant Volume: Comparison with Transarterial Chemoembolization

BACKGROUND: Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) increases the future liver remnant (FLR) volume, thus enabling surgical resection in patients with small FLR volume. It is unclear, however, if this approach can enhance survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We therefore compared the outcomes of preoperative PVE and surgical resection with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS: Changes in FLR volumes were analyzed in 32 HCC patients who underwent preoperative PVE and surgical resection. Long-term outcomes were compared with 64 TACE-treated patients matched for gender, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class, tumor size and number, serum alpha-fetoprotein levels, and UICC stage. RESULTS: In the PVE group, the baseline ratio of FLR/total estimated liver volumes (TELV) was 27.6 +/- 7.2%. Following PVE, FLR volume increased 34% (336.5 vs 449.4 mL, P < .001) and the ratio of FLR/TELV increased from 27.6 +/- 7.2 to 36.9 +/- 8.1% (P < .001). There was no mortality associated with PVE or surgical resection. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PVE group than in the TACE group (71.9% vs 45.6%, P = .03). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment modality was an independent predictive factor for survival (odds ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01-4.16, P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PVE enables surgical resection in HCC patients with small FLR volume and improves patient survival compared with TACE.     

Portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy: prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of liver hypertrophy of the future liver remnant volume (FLR) induced by preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) on the immediate postoperative complications after a standardized major liver resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: PVE is usually indicated when FLR is estimated to be too small for major liver resection. However, few data exist regarding the exact quantification of sufficient minimal functional hepatic volume required to avoid postoperative complications in both patients with or without chronic liver disease. METHODS: All consecutive patients in whom an elective right hepatectomy was feasible and who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria between 1998 and 2000 were assigned to have alternatively either immediate surgery or surgery after PVE. Among 55 patients (25 liver metastases, 2 cholangiocarcinoma, and 28 hepatocellular carcinoma), 28 underwent right hepatectomy after PVE and 27 underwent immediate surgery. Twenty-eight patients had chronic liver disease. FLR and estimated rate of functional future liver remnant (%FFLR) volumes were assessed by computed tomography. RESULTS: The mean increase of FLR and %FFLR 4 to 8 weeks after PVE were respectively 44 +/- 19% and 16 +/- 7% for patients with normal liver and 35 +/- 28% and 9 +/- 3% for those with chronic liver disease. All patients with normal liver and 86% with chronic liver disease experienced hypertrophy after PVE. The postoperative course of patients with normal liver who underwent PVE before right hepatectomy was similar to those with immediate surgery. In contrast, PVE in patients with chronic liver disease significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative complications as well as the intensive care unit stay and total hospital stay after right hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Before elective right hepatectomy, the hypertrophy of FLR induced by PVE had no beneficial effect on the postoperative course in patients with normal liver. In contrast, in patients with chronic liver disease, the hypertrophy of the FLR induced by PVE decreased significantly the rate of postoperative complications.