Comparison of Two Luting Agents Used for the Retention of Cast Dowel and Cores

PURPOSE: The first purpose of this study was to compare the retentive values of zinc phosphate and Panavia F resin cements when used for luting cast dowel and cores. The second purpose was to determine whether the use of a lubricant when making the resin pattern for a custom dowel and core would have an effect on the final retention of dowels cemented with either zinc phosphate or Panavia F cements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-three caries-free extracted single-rooted human teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 21. Root canal preparations were standardized for all 63 teeth. Clinical protocols for fabricating and cementing dowel and core restorations were examined, comparing zinc phosphate and Panavia F resin cements. Direct dowel patterns were fabricated using the Para Post system and cast in a noble metal alloy. Group I dowel spaces were lubricated with GC lubricant prior to dowel pattern fabrication and cleaned with Cavidry solvent before cementing the cast dowel and core with zinc phosphate cement. Group II dowel spaces were rinsed with water only prior to dowel pattern fabrication. The dowels and cores in this group were cemented with Panavia F resin cement. Group III dowel spaces were lubricated with GC lubricant prior to dowel pattern fabrication; the dowel spaces were cleaned with Cavidry solvent before the cast dowel and cores were cemented with Panavia F cement. The tensile force necessary to remove the cast dowel and cores was determined using a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The dowels and cores in Group I had significantly higher retentive values than either of the two Panavia F groups (p< or = 0.001). No difference in retentive values (p > 0.05) was found between dowels luted with either of the lubricating agents in the Panavia F groups. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc phosphate cement had higher retentive values when cementing cast dowel and cores than Panavia F. The type of lubricant used for the resin dowel fabrication (water or GC lubricant that was removed with a solvent) had no effect on the retention of cast dowels cemented with Panavia F.     

The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The role of adhesive properties of cements on the retentive strength of crowns with different degrees of taper is not clear. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the retention of full crowns prepared with 3 different tapers and cemented with 2 conventional and 2 adhesive resin cements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred twenty sound human molar teeth were assigned randomly to 1 of 12 groups, (n=10). The groups represented the 4 cements: zinc phosphate (Fleck's), a conventional glass ionomer (Ketac-Cem); 2 adhesive resin cements (C&B Metabond and Panavia); and 3 tapers of 6-degrees, 12-degrees, and 24-degrees within each cement. Crowns were cast with a high noble alloy. The 6-degree taper was considered the control within each cement group. Retention was measured (MPa) by separating the metal crowns from the prepared teeth under tension on a universal testing machine. Analysis of variance was used to test the main effects on the retentive strength of full crowns, namely cements, tapers, and failure modes. The Fisher's multiple comparison test was used to evaluate the source of the differences. The chi(2) analyses were used to examine the relationships between failure types, cements, and tapers. All statistical tests were conducted at alpha=.05. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the main effect cement (P<.0001) and taper (P=.0002). The mean retentive strength values of both Fleck's and Ketac-Cem were significantly lower than the mean retentive strength values of both C&B Metabond and Panavia (P<.0001). The retention of crowns prepared with 6-degree taper was not significant from the 12-degree taper (P=.0666). The difference in retention was significant between the 6-degree taper and the 24-degree taper (P<.0001) and between 12-degree taper and 24-degree taper (P=.0178). The types of failure were adhesive in the cement (65%), cohesive in the tooth (31%), and assembly failure (fracture of embedding resin) (4%). The type of failure was dependent on the degree of taper (P<.0001) and on the type of cement (P<.0042). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the retentive values of the adhesive resins at 24-degree taper were 20% higher than the retentive values of the conventional cements at 6-degree taper. The use of resin luting agents yielded retention values that were double the values of zinc phosphate or conventional glass ionomer cement.     

Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: In vitro studies on the retentive strengths of various cements used to retain posts have reported conflicting results. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strength of commercially pure titanium and type III cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with zinc phosphate or resin cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-two extracted human canines were endodontically treated. The root preparations were accomplished using Largo reamers (10 mm in depth and 1.7 mm in diameter). Acrylic resin patterns for the posts and cores were made, and specimens were cast in commercially pure titanium and in type III gold alloy (n=7). Fourteen titanium cast posts and cores were submitted to surface treatment with Kroll acid solution and to scanning electron microscopy (SEM), before and after acid etching. The groups (n=7) were cemented with zinc phosphate cement or resin cement (Panavia F). Tensile strengths were measured in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results (Kgf) were statistically analyzed by 2-way ANOVA (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The 2-way ANOVA indicated that there were no significant differences among the groups tested. Retentive means for zinc phosphate and Panavia F cements were statistically similar. The bond strength was not influenced by the alloy, the luting material, or the etching treatment. SEM analysis indicated that the etched surfaces were smoother than those that did not receive surface treatment, but this fact did not influence the results. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially pure titanium cast posts and cores cemented with zinc phosphate and resin cements demonstrated similar mean tensile retentive values. Retentive values were also similar to mean values recorded for cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with zinc phosphate cement and resin cements.     

Comparison of the tensile bond strengths of cast metal crowns luted with resin cements

The limitation of photoactivation of dual-polymerized resin cements along the margins of metal restorations may adversely affect the mechanical properties of these cements, thus impairing the retention of restorations. The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength of cast metal crowns cemented with three dual-polymerized resin cements, using a chemically-activated resin cement and zinc phosphate as controls. Fifty nickel-chromium alloy crowns were cast and randomly assigned to five groups of equal size. Castings were cemented on their corresponding metal dies with one of the tested luting agents: Scotchbond Resin Cement, Enforce and Panavia F (dual-polymerized resin cements), Cement-It (chemically-activated resin cement) and Zinc Phosphate Cement (zinc phosphate cement). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h and then loaded in tension until failure. Panavia F and Zinc Phosphate Cement provided the highest and lowest bond strength means, respectively. Scotchbond Resin Cement, Enforce and Cement-It cements exhibited similar intermediate values, but with statistically significant difference compared to the other materials (P < 0.05). Even with the restriction or absence of light activation, all tested dual-polymerized resin cements produced significantly higher bond strength than did the zinc phosphate cement and yielded similar or better results than the chemically activated cement. It should be pointed out that the findings of this study relate to a test scenario which does not mimic clinical circumstances and that further work is required to identify the clinical significance of the reported tensile bond strength differences between the different luting materials.     

Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Past research has not controlled preparation surface area when examining the influence of dentin desensitizers on the retentive strength of cemented cast crowns, leading to inconsistent results. PURPOSE: This research controlled crown preparation surface area and evaluated the effect of various dentin desensitizers and conventional cementing agents on the in vitro retentive strength of cast crowns. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Freshly extracted human molars were prepared for a standardized crown preparation (26 degrees total convergence, 4 mm axial height) with a custom-made pantograph. Dentin desensitizers included none (control), a polymerizable material (All-Bond 2), and a nonpolymerizable desensitizer (Gluma Desensitizer). Cementing agents included zinc phosphate (Fleck's), glass ionomer (Ketac-Cem), resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II), and resin cement (Panavia 21). Twelve teeth were prepared for each test condition (144 teeth total). Individual castings were made from a base metal alloy (Rexillium III). Crowns were removed after storage at 26 degrees C for 48 hours at 100% relative humidity using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.27 mm/min. The proportion of cement retained on the tooth and casting after debonding was quantified according to treatment. Statistical treatment included 1- and 2-way ANOVAs, followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test at a preset alpha of 0.05.Results. Resin cement exhibited the highest retentive strength and all dentin treatments resulted in significantly different retentive values (All-Bond 2 (5.68 +/- 0.70 MPa) > control (4.67 +/- 0.48 MPa) > Gluma (4.12 +/- 0.37 MPa)). Retention of resin-modified glass ionomer was between the resin cement and glass ionomer groups: All-Bond 2 (3.46 +/- 0.26 MPa) > Gluma (2.81 +/- 0.15 MPa) = control (2.96 +/- 0.18 MPa). Conventional glass ionomer values were between those of Fuji Plus and zinc phosphate groups: All Bond 2 (2.23 +/- 0. 20 MPa) = control (2.36 +/- 0.20 MPa) > Gluma (1.98 +/- 0.23 MPa). Zinc phosphate had the lowest retention values: control (1.68 +/- 0. 08 MPa) > Gluma (0.81 +/- 0.11 MPa) > All-Bond 2 (0.67 +/- 0.14 MPa). The majority of cement was retained on the debonded tooth surface versus the casting, with the exception of zinc phosphate when used with dentin pretreatments. CONCLUSION: Controlled crown surface areas reduced the variation in strength values permitting high discrimination among retention values of desensitizer/cement combinations. In all but 1 combination, Gluma desensitizer significantly decreased crown retention. With resin cement and resin-modified glass ionomer, use of All-Bond 2 desensitizer significantly increased crown retention values.     

Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements.

This study evaluated the retention of complete crowns by using five different methods of cementation. Complete crowns were prepared with standardized dimensions on extracted human molars. Metal crowns were cast with a high noble gold ceramic alloy and were cemented with zinc phosphate cement, glass ionomer cement, composite resin cement, composite resin cement with a dentinal bonding agent, and adhesive resin cement. The retention was measured by subjecting the specimens to tensile load until fracture occurred. The disintegration was measured according to American Dental Association Specification No. 8, and the condition of the cements at the margins of crowns was analyzed by use of a scanning electron microscope. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences between the mean retentive strengths. The retention of the zinc phosphate and the glass ionomer groups was significantly different from that of the adhesive resin group. The retention of the adhesive resin cement was 65% greater than the retention of the composite resin and the composite resin/dentinal bonding agent group, but the Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon rank sum test did not depict this difference as significant. The mean +/- SD of the disintegration for the zinc phosphate, the glass ionomer cement, and the composite resin cement was 0.025 +/- 0.013, 0.023 +/- 0.011, and 0.017 +/- 0.001, respectively. The scanning electron microscope analysis of the margins revealed that the composite resin cement was almost intact, the zinc phosphate was subjected to limited disintegration, and the glass ionomer displayed the worst marginal integrity.     

不同粘固剂对 IPS-Empress 2后牙全瓷冠边缘适合性的影响

目的 :探讨不同粘固剂粘固的IPS Empress 2后牙全瓷冠的边缘适合性。方法 :采用印模复制和扫描电镜技术 ,测量磷酸锌粘固剂、PanaviaF树脂粘结系统和Dyracteompomer粘结剂粘固的IPS Empress 2后牙全瓷冠咀嚼模拟试验前后的边缘粘固剂厚度 ,并观察粘固剂表面状态。结果 :3种粘固剂粘固的全瓷冠边缘粘固剂厚度无显著性差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;磷酸锌粘固剂粘固的全瓷冠边缘粘固层有明显缺损 ,且咀嚼模拟试验后缺损增多 ,而另两种树脂类粘固剂未见明显缺损。结论 :PanaviaF树脂粘结系统和Dyractcompomer粘结剂粘固的IPS Empress 2后牙全瓷冠具有良好而稳定的边缘适合性     

Interim luting agents, composite core surface hardness and retention of interim and final restorations

This study compared the effects of ZOE interim cement on the retention of interim acrylic and final cast crowns (cemented with zinc phosphate) over cores of current conventional and hybrid composite resin formulae, and a non-eugenol interim cement (NOG) and a calcium hydroxide liner (CaOH2) on interim and final retention values over hybrid cores. Results were compared to retention of cast crowns over amalgam cores. Retention was measured with an Instron Testing Machine. Location of cement failure during separation was recorded. Surface hardness of each group was compared. Retention of cast crowns cemented with zinc phosphate over amalgam cores was significantly higher than that of any of the resin core groups (ANOVA, P less than 0.05, Sheffe Contrast). There was no significant difference in final casting retention cemented over hybrid or conventional resin cores exposed to ZOE (13.625 vs 14.125 Kg). Final casting retention differences were not significant between the three interim cement groups. Final retention of all groups exposed to an interim luting agent were significantly less than the composite control groups. The use of CaOH, as an interim luting agent for acrylic crowns over hybrid cores compared to ZOE or NOG, should afford significantly greater retention with no adverse effect on the retention of the final casting. While the surface hardness of both types of composite resin was adversely affected by exposure to interim luting agents as compared to controls, there was no correlation between final casting retention values and surface hardness of polished composite. The interim cements invariably failed at the interim acrylic crown interface while the zinc phosphate cement failed at the core interface.     

Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems.

This study compared the retention of posts in the root for various diameters (1.3 mm and 1.6 mm) of three prefabricated post systems (Unity, Filpost, and Brasseler) with that of the previously reported No. 1 and No. 2 Flexi-Post systems. The experiment was divided into three groups comprising 10 samples for each post system studied. In group 2, the Filpost system was cemented both with a resin cement and zinc phosphate cement. Retention values were obtained with a modified universal testing machine. The retention of 1.3 mm posts from most to least retentive was Flexi-Post (zinc phosphate) greater than Filpost (zinc phosphate) greater than Filpost (resin) greater than Brasseler (zinc phosphate), greater than Unity (resin). The retention of 1.6 mm posts from most to least was Flexi-Post (zinc phosphate) greater than Filpost (zinc phosphate) greater than Brasseler (zinc phosphate), Unity (resin) greater than Filpost (resin). The Filpost system achieved higher retention with zinc phosphate cement than it did with resin cement.     

The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements

Two series of brass cones and two series of dentine posts with varying surface roughness were produced. Maximum roughness value and arithmetical mean roughness were recorded for each cone. Brass crowns were cemented either with zinc phosphate cement (De Trey's zinc Cenment Improved) or with polycarboxylate cement (Durelon). A tensile stress was applied until the crown and the cone separated. The retentive force in relation to retention area was measured. The results showed that the retentive ability of both cements increased with increasing surface roughness. The increase in retention was greater for brass than for dentine. Differences were also found between the two cements; on smooth surfaces the zinc phosphate cement had a lower retentive ability than the polycarboxylate cement, but on rough surfaces the opposite relationship was observed.     

Effect of seating force,margin design,and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the marginal discrepancy and retention of silver-palladium crowns cemented with zinc phosphate (Phosphacap) and glass-ionomer cement (Fuji Cap 1) using different seating forces on preparations with various margin designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Crown preparations with three finish lines--chamfer, shoulder, and shoulder with a 45-degree bevel--were sequentially prepared on a dentoform premolar. A metal die for each of the three finish lines was constructed. Complete metal crowns were fabricated for each metal die using a silver-palladium alloy. Three different seating forces--25, 100, and 300 N--were used to load the crowns until initial set of the cement. The marginal discrepancy was calculated by measuring the change in crown height before and after cementation using a digimatic indicator. Retention was determined by measuring the tensile strength using the Lloyd universal testing machine. RESULTS: The higher seating forces produced better crown seating but had no significant effect on crown retention. The shoulder and shoulder with bevel finish lines provided better crown retention than the chamfer. Glass-ionomer cement provided greater crown retention than zinc phosphate cement. No significant correlation between marginal seating and crown retention was revealed using a Pearson analysis. CONCLUSION: Marginal seal was not influenced by either margin design or type of luting cement, but was improved with higher seating force. Crown retention was affected by the margin finish line and the luting agent.     

Effects of intra-core mechanical interlocks and cement type on full crown retention.

This study compared the retention of full cast crowns over cores of amalgam or a Bis-GMA composite resin when cemented with a Bis-GMA composite resin cement or a zinc phosphate cement. The surfaces of two groups of Bis-GMA composite cores were mechanically altered with a groove or dimples to provide physical retention; two other groups were either etched with 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) or exposed to a zinc oxide-eugenol interim luting agent before crown cementation. Control groups of unaltered composite or amalgam core served as comparison standards. The zinc phosphate cement provided significantly greater retention with the amalgam core than with any of the composite cores. The APF-treated composite cores had the least retention of any of the zinc phosphate cementations. Cementation failure over the composite cores was at the core surface. Crown retention over the control and dimpled-surface composite core with the resin cement was twice that with zinc phosphate, and significantly greater than retention of castings cemented with the resin cement over amalgam cores. Retention over amalgam cores was significantly greater with zinc phosphate cement than with the composite resin cement.     

Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study

PURPOSE

Many dentists use desensitizing agents to prevent hypersensitivity. This study compared and evaluated the effect of two desensitizing agents on the retention of cast crowns when cemented with various luting agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety freshly extracted human molars were prepared with flat occlusal surface, 6 degree taper and approximately 4 mm axial length. The prepared specimens were divided into 3 groups and each group is further divided into 3 subgroups. Desensitizing agents used were GC Tooth Mousse and GLUMA® desensitizer. Cementing agents used were zinc phosphate, glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement. Individual crowns with loop were made from base metal alloy. Desensitizing agents were applied before cementation of crowns except for control group. Under tensional force the crowns were removed using an automated universal testing machine. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey-Kramer post hoc test at a preset alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Resin modified glass ionomer cement exhibited the highest retentive strength and all dentin treatments resulted in significantly different retentive values (In Kg.): GLUMA (49.02 ± 3.32) > Control (48.61 ± 3.54) > Tooth mousse (48.34 ± 2.94). Retentive strength for glass ionomer cement were GLUMA (41.14 ± 2.42) > Tooth mousse (40.32 ± 3.89) > Control (39.09 ± 2.80). For zinc phosphate cement the retentive strength were lowest GLUMA (27.92 ± 3.20) > Control (27.69 ± 3.39) > Tooth mousse (25.27 ± 4.60).

CONCLUSION

The use of GLUMA® desensitizer has no effect on crown retention. GC Tooth Mousse does not affect the retentive ability of glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement, but it decreases the retentive ability of zinc phosphate cement.     

Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements

This investigation evaluated the retention of preformed posts with four different cements: C & B Metabond, Panavia, All-Bond 2, and Ketac-Cem. Sixty intact maxillary canines were selected for the study. The clinical crowns were removed and endodontic therapy done on each root, which was then prepared to receive prefabricated posts. The 60 samples were divided into four groups of 15, and the posts in each group were cemented with one of the four cements. The roots were mounted in acrylic resin blocks and the posts were separated from the canals with an Instron testing machine. Analysis of the forces needed to dislodge the posts with analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls test disclosed that C & B Metabond cement was the most retentive (p < 0.05). No difference in retention was recorded between Ketac-Cem and Panavia cements. All-Bond 2 cement was the least retentive of cements.     

Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments

PURPOSE: The integrity and retention of cemented restorations over implant abutments is difficult to achieve when the axial wall height of the abutment is short. PURPOSE:: To compare the effect of different surface conditions on the retentiveness of titanium crowns cemented over short (3 mm) ITI solid abutments using 2 types of cement. Surface pretreatment included sandblasting, silicoating, and application of alloy primer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-eight ITI implants and solid abutments 5.5 mm in height were divided into six groups. The axial height of abutments in group I was unaltered to serve as a control. The remaining abutments in (groups II-VI) were reduced to a 3-mm height. Groups I and II were luted with ZnPO4 cement without any surface pretreatment. In groups III and IV, the fit surface of the castings and solid abutments were sandblasted, before luting, with ZnPO4 or Panavia 21, respectively. In group V castings and abutments were sandblasted, pretreated with Siloc Bond, and luted with Panavia 21. In group VI castings and abutments were sandblasted, pretreated with alloy primer, and luted with Panavia 21. Crown retention was measured using a universal testing machine after 1 week of storage in water at 37 degrees C. RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed a highly significant difference among the groups. Sandblasted castings and abutments pretreated with alloy primer or Siloc Bond before luting with Paravia 21 resin cement exhibited the greatest retentive strength (P < 0.05). Castings luted with zinc phosphate over short ITI solid abutment exhibited the lowest retention (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The retention of titanium castings luted over ITI solid abutments was influenced by axial height, surface texture, surface pretreatment, and type of cement. Phosphoric alloy primer is more effective and less technique sensitive than the Siloc Bond with regard to retention enhancement of titanium castings over short ITI solid abutment.     

Effect of two axial wall height preparations on the retentive properties of full crowns using three different cements

This study evaluated how different tooth preparation heights and luting cements affected the retention of metallic full crowns. Tooth preparations were made on 60 extracted maxillary premolars with occluso-cervical heights of 4.0 or 5.0 mm. The nickel chromium (NiCr) metallic crowns in each group were subdivided randomly into three groups (n = 10); the samples in each group were cemented with either a self-adhesive resin cement, a conventional resin cement, or a zinc phosphate cement. Cementation was performed by applying 5.0 kg pressure in 50% relative humidity. Specimens were stored in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for seven days, at which time they were subjected to a vertical tensile test with a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min. Data (Kgf) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons tests (alpha = 0.01). There was a significant difference in mean force in the height preparations (P < 0.001) and in tensile strength (P < 0.001) among the resin cements. Regardless of the cement used, 5.0 mm high preparations showed significantly higher mean forces than the 4.0 mm high preparations. The self-adhesive resin cement showed significantly higher mean tensile strength than the conventional resin cement; the zinc phosphate cement displayed the lowest retention values. The self-adhesive resin cement displayed retention rates twice that of the zinc phosphate cement.     

Short-term retentive values of zirconium oxide posts cemented with glass ionomer and resin cement: an in vitro study and a case report.

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the results of an investigation focusing on the retention of all-ceramic posts. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of two luting agents--a glass-ionomer cement (Ketac Cem) and a resin cement (Panavia F)--on the retention of a prefabricated ceramic post (Cerapost) after different pretreatment techniques in vitro. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Forty freshly extracted incisors and canines were treated endodontically. The root canals were filled with laterally condensed gutta-percha and sealer. The teeth were assigned to 1 of 4 groups, each containing 10 specimens: sandblasted/nonsandblasted post cemented with glass-ionomer cement and sandblasted/nonsandblasted post cemented with resin cement. Tensile tests were carried out. The specimens were also quantitatively analyzed under a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The retentive strengths of posts, sandblasted and nonsandblasted, and cemented with Panavia F resin cement, were significantly increased as compared to those cemented with Ketac Cem. CONCLUSION: Both the luting agent and the post-surface pretreatment had a significant influence on the retention of the ceramic post.     

Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation

PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of cement type and application technique on seating discrepancies and retention forces of noble alloy castings cemented on titanium abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eugenol-free zinc oxide (Freegenol), zinc phosphate (Harvard), glass ionomer (KetacCem), polycarboxylate (Durelon), and self-adhesive resin (RelyX Unicem) cements were used. The inner surfaces of the castings were either completely coated or half-coated with cement. Abutments were used as delivered with a machined surface for the first part of the study. Groups of 8 castings were cemented in both ways. For the second part of the study, the abutments were air-abraded (aluminum oxide, 50 microm particle size), and groups of 8 completely coated castings were cemented with all cements. Marginal discrepancies were measured before and immediately after cementation. Tensile tests were conducted to measure the retention forces. Statistical analysis was performed with pair-wise comparison using the Wilcoxon rank sum test modified by Bonferroni-Holm. RESULTS: Change in seating discrepancies did not differ significantly among the different application techniques. The median retention forces for completely-coated castings were 177 N for eugenol-free zinc oxide, 346 N for zinc phosphate, 469 N for glass ionomer, 813 N for polycarboxylate, and 653 N for self-adhesive resin. With respect to retention force, 3 significantly different groups (P < .05) were identified: (1) zinc oxide, (2) zinc phosphate/glass ionomer, and (3) polycarboxylate/self-adhesive resin. No differences in retention between the 2 coating techniques were found for any cement. However, air abrading the abutments resulted in increased retention of the castings for some of the cements. CONCLUSIONS: Half-coating of the restorations with cements did not result in reduced retention values compared to the complete coating technique, but air abrasion resulted in increased retention with some cements.     

The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Cements that yield high retentive values are believed to allow use of shorter posts. PURPOSE: This study investigated the use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced dowel length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retention values of stainless steel posts (parallel-sided ParaPost and tapered Dentatus in 5-, 8-, and 10-mm lengths) luted with Flexi-Flow titanium-reinforced composite resin and zinc phosphate cements were evaluated. Single-rooted extracted human teeth with crowns (n = 120), removed at the cementoenamel junction, were randomly divided into 4 groups of 30 samples each. Different post lengths were luted with either Flexi-Flow or zinc phosphate. Each sample was placed into a specialized jig and on a tensile testing machine with a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min, applied until failure. The effect of different posts and cements on the force required to dislodge the dowels was evaluated with multiple analyses of variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA with Scheffé contrast was applied to determine the effect of different post lengths on the retentive failure of posts luted with the 2 agents. RESULTS: Flexi-Flow reinforced composite resin cement significantly increased retention of ParaPost and Dentatus dowels (P<.001) compared with zinc phosphate. One-way ANOVA revealed no statistically significant difference (P>.05) between mean retention of both dowels luted with Flexi-Flow for all posts length used (5 mm = 8 mm = 10 mm). Mean retention values of the groups luted with zinc phosphate showed a statistically significant difference (P<.001) for the different post lengths (10 > 8 > 5 mm). Parallel-sided ParaPost dowels demonstrated a higher mean retention than tapered Dentatus dowels (P<.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, Flexi-Flow reinforced composite resin cement compensated for the reduced length of shorter parallel-sided ParaPost and tapered Dentatus dowels.     

Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.

There is limited dental literature evaluating the retentive capabilities of luting agents when used between metal components, such as cast metal restorations cemented onto machined metal implant abutments. This study compared the retentive strengths of 5 different classes of luting agents used to cement cast noble metal alloy crowns to 8-degree machined titanium cementable implant abutments from the Straumann ITI Implant System. Sixty prefabricated 5.5-mm solid titanium implant abutments and implants were used; 30 received the standard surface preparation and the other 30 received an anodized surface preparation. Anodized implant components were used to reflect current implant marketing. Sixty castings were fabricated and randomly paired with an abutment and implant. A total of 12 castings were cemented onto the implant-abutment assemblies for each of the 5 different luting agents (zinc phosphate, resin composite, glass ionomer, resin-reinforced glass ionomer, and zinc oxide-non-eugenol). After cementation, the assemblies were stored in a humidor at room temperature prior to thermocycling for 24 hours. Each casting was pulled from its respective abutment, and the force at which bond failure occurred was recorded as retentive strength. A statistically significant difference was found between the 5 cements at P < or = .001. Of the cements used, resin composite demonstrated the highest mean retentive strength. Zinc phosphate and resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cements were the next most retentive, while glass ionomer and zinc oxide-non-eugenol cements demonstrated minimal retention. In addition, retention was not altered by the use of an anodized abutment surface.