Clinical evaluation of tocilizumab for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-TNF biologics: tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate

Abstract

We retrospectively observed the clinical efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in 74 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 13 hospitals, without any restrictions on disease duration or stage, treatment history, and other influencing factors. TCZ was infused by the approved method, and disease activity was evaluated every 4 weeks until week 24 using a joint disease activity score (DAS28). Remission and treatment response were categorised using European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definitions. We also analysed the impact of previous treatment with other biologics and of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) therapy on the efficacy of TCZ. At week 24, the DAS28 had improved from 5.5 to 2.7 and the EULAR remission rate was 55.2%. Good and moderate responses according to the EULAR criteria were obtained in 61 and 36% of the patients, respectively. The biologic-naïve group had a significantly better DAS28 (2.1 vs. 2.8) and a significantly higher “good” response rate (86% vs. 54%) than the biologic-exposed group. Although the TCZ + MTX treatment group and the TCZ monotherapy group had a good response rate of 71 and 48%, respectively, the difference was not significant. Based on these results, we conclude that TCZ is able to significantly alleviate disease symptoms in a wide range of patients with RA in a normal clinical context.     

The add-on effectiveness and safety of iguratimod in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who showed an inadequate response to tocilizumab

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of add-on iguratimod (IGU) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who showed an inadequate response to tocilizumab (TCZ), especially patients who were intolerant of an effective dose of methotrexate (MTX).

Methods: Thirty-one patients with RA (22 women, age 62.4 years, disease duration 13.8 years, prior TCZ duration 35.7 months, 25 intravenous [8?mg/kg/4 weeks] and 6 subcutaneous [162?mg/2 weeks] TCZ treatments, concomitant MTX 8.5?mg/week [35.5%], and prednisolone (PSL) 4.3?mg/day [25.8%]) who showed an inadequate response to TCZ (disease activity score assessing 28 joints with C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] 2.9, clinical disease activity index [CDAI] 15.0, 28 secondary inadequate responders) were treated with additional IGU (final dose 41.7?mg/day) and enrolled in this 24-week, multicenter, retrospective study.

Results: Twenty-nine patients (93.5%) continued the treatment for 24 weeks (one dropped out for pneumonia and one for digestive symptoms). The TCZ and the concomitant dose and rate of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (MTX, salazosulfapyridine [SASP], and tacrolimus [TAC]) were not significantly changed during this period. Outcome measures improved significantly, as follows: DAS28-CRP from 2.9 to 1.7 (p?<?.001); CDAI from 15.0 to 6.0 (p?<?.001); modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) from 0.8 to 0.6 (p?<?.05); and rheumatoid factor (RF) from 382.1 to 240.3?IU/mL (p?<?.001). Using the EULAR criteria, 64.5% achieved a moderate response, and 51.6% achieved ACR 20 at 24 weeks.

Conclusion: Adding IGU to inadequate responders to TCZ may be a promising and safe complementary treatment option.     

Body mass index and response to tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: a real life study

Several studies have suggested that obesity could have a negative effect on response to anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Little is known about the impact of body mass index (BMI) on other biologic agents. We aimed to evaluate the effect of BMI on response to tocilizumab (TCZ) in RA. RA patients treated with TCZ were included in this multicenter retrospective study. BMI was calculated at the initiation of treatment. After 6 months of treatment, change from baseline in DAS28, pain on a visual analog scale, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level, and tender and swollen joints were analyzed. The primary endpoint was decrease in DAS28 ≥ 1.2. Secondary outcomes were good response and remission by EULAR criteria. At baseline, among 115 RA patients included, the median (interquartile range) BMI was 25.4 (22.0–28.8)?kg/m². The number of patients with normal weight, overweight, and obesity was 53 (46 %), 37 (32 %), and 25 (22 %), respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the three subgroups of BMI. The median BMI did not differ between responders and non-responders for DAS28 decrease ≥1.2 (25.7 [22.1–29.9] vs 24.9 [22.0–27.1], P?=?0.38), EULAR good response (25.9 [22.8–30.0] vs 25.4 [22.0–28.4], P?=?0.61), and remission (25.1 [22.5–28.6] vs 25.4 [22.0–28.9], P?=?0.76). BMI did not affect the response to TCZ in RA. If confirmed, these results could be helpful for the selection of a biologic agent in obese RA patients.     

Effectiveness of golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to tocilizumab

Objectives: Several biological disease–modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are currently available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Increasing evidence indicates that second-line bDMARDs are effective for inadequate responders to first-line bDMARDs. However, all previous studies investigated the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as a first-line bDMARD, while investigated the efficacy of second-line bDMARDs after the use of tocilizumab (TCZ), a non-TNFi, as a first-line bDMARD. Thus, we investigated the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) as a second-line bDMARD after treatment with TCZ as a first-line bDMARD.

Methods: The final study population consisted of 26 patients (inadequate responders to TCZ; TCZ group) with moderate or high disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≥3.2) at week 24 of treatment with TCZ as a first-line bDMARD or whose DAS28-ESR score worsened after starting TCZ treatment. These patients could be followed for another 52 weeks or more after the subsequent switch to GLM treatment. For comparison, 19 patients treated with TNFi as a first-line bDMARD and inadequate response to TNFi (TNFi group) were included.

Results: The DAS28-ESR score at week 52 after the start of treatment with GLM improved significantly compared with baseline in the TCZ and TNFi groups. However, the TCZ group showed significantly better improvement. Patients in both groups had significantly improved treatment outcomes according to European League Against Rheumatism response criteria, but there was no statistically significant difference among them. The retention rate at week 52 after the start of treatment with GLM was significantly higher in the TCZ group than in the TNFi group (81% vs. 68%, respectively). In addition, no difference was found in the progression of bone destruction determined by the change in van der Heijde modified total Sharp scoring system scores between groups.

Conclusions: GLM was an effective therapeutic option for inadequate responders to TCZ.     

Dose escalation of parenteral methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis that has been unresponsive to conventional doses of methotrexate: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dose escalation of intramuscular (IM) methotrexate (MTX) up to 45 mg/week improves disease control in patients who have active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite receiving conventional doses (15 mg/week) of IM MTX, and to obtain preliminary data on patient tolerability and adverse effects of higher doses of IM MTX. METHODS: Patients >18 years of age who had active RA, defined as a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) of >3.2, and who had received 15-20 mg/week of oral MTX for at least 2 months were switched (week 0) to 15 mg/week of IM MTX for 6 weeks. Patients whose DAS28 remained >3.2 at both week 4 and week 6 were randomized, in a double-blind manner, either to continue to receive 15 mg/week IM MTX with monthly placebo escalation or to receive escalating doses of IM MTX monthly up to 45 mg/week. The dose of MTX or placebo was escalated every 4 weeks if the DAS28 was >2.5. Safety assessments and determination of the DAS28 were performed every 2 weeks and monthly, respectively. Disease activity parameters from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core disease activity set and health status as recorded on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 were determined at baseline (week 0) and final assessment (week 22). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each group achieving a target DAS28 of <3.2. Secondary outcomes comprised the percentage of patients whose DAS28 improved by >1.2, the percentage of patients achieving a 20% improvement in the ACR core disease activity measures (ACR20), and the percentage of patients achieving a good response, a moderate response, or no response in accordance with the EULAR response criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were eligible for entry and were switched from oral MTX to 15 mg/week IM MTX. At baseline, the mean +/- SD DAS28 was 5.6 +/- 0.88; after 6 weeks of IM MTX, the DAS28 had improved by a mean of 0.42 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.15-0.69). At 6 weeks, 54 patients still had a DAS28 of >3.2 and were therefore eligible for randomization. By 22 weeks, 1 patient (3.7%) in each group achieved the primary outcome of a DAS28 <3.2 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -15% to +15%). Five patients (18.5%) in each group showed an improvement of >1.2 in the DAS28 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -18% to +18%). One patient (3.7%) in each group achieved an ACR20 response, but none achieved a good response as defined by the EULAR response criteria. One patient in each group had a serious adverse reaction; minor adverse reactions were more frequently reported in the dose escalation group. CONCLUSION: Switching from oral to parenteral MTX 15 mg/week results in a minor improvement in disease control. For patients with active RA receiving 15 mg/week IM MTX, increasing the dose up to 45 mg/week does not improve disease control. Higher doses of IM MTX were generally well tolerated and not associated with an increase in serious adverse reactions to the drug.     

The efficacy and safety of reinstitution of tocilizumab in patients with relapsed active rheumatoid arthritis after long-term withdrawal of tocilizumab

Abstract

We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) re-administration in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had previously received TCZ treatment for about 31 months. Four patients whose RA had been well-controlled with 8 mg/kg TCZ treatment every 4 weeks and had withdrawn from the treatment were enrolled. They resumed TCZ treatment after TCZ was authorized for RA treatment in Japan. Disease activity was assessed by the Disease Activity Score 28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and synovitis in the wrists and elbows was measured by ultrasonography at baseline and during follow-up. The mean DAS28-ESR was 6.32 before the first TCZ infusion. After fewer than 20 months of initial TCZ treatment, the mean DAS28-ESR decreased to 1.87. However, after withdrawal of TCZ treatment, the disease activity could not be sufficiently controlled with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or biologic agents. The maximum interval between TCZ treatments was approximately 34 months. Following reinstatement of the TCZ treatment, within 12 months the mean DAS28-ESR improved from 5.21 to 2.87, with the synovitis in the wrists and elbow joints also showing great improvement. These findings demonstrate that TCZ retreatment in active RA patients who had relapsed after long-term discontinuation of TCZ treatment led to an improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA and in synovitis without any severe adverse events.     

Effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in monotherapy in biologic-naïve and non-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-world setting

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) versus patients with previous biologic exposure in a real-world setting.Materials and methodsNon-controlled clinical-trial, 32-week prospective multicenter study including RA patients with moderate-severe disease activity starting TCZ in monotherapy who had a prior inadequate response or were intolerant to methotrexate (MTX). Effectiveness according to EULAR response evaluated at 24-week and safety at 32-weekwere assessed.ResultsOf the 93 were enrolled of whom 84 (90%) were eligible for the effectiveness analysis. Biologic-naïve patients (n = 46, 54.8%) were younger (51.5 versus 57.9) with shorter disease duration (6.4 versus 13.3) but presented similar comorbidities in comparison with non-naïve patients. DAS28 remission was achieved in a higher percentage in the group of patients with prior biological treatment. 89 adverse events (AE) were recorded in 50 patients, most of them non-serious AE (non-SAE) (86.3%).ConclusionsIn a real world setting, TCZ exhibit similar effectiveness and safety in monotherapy in patients with RA regardless previous exposure to other biologic therapies. This study provides additional and valuable real-world findings on the use of TCZ in patients with RA.     

Tocilizumab is clinically,functionally, and radiographically effective and safe either with or without low-dose methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate responses to DMARDs and/or TNF inhibitors: A single-center retrospective cohort study (KEIO-TCZ study) at week 52

Abstract

Objectives. To explore the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) with or without methotrexate (MTX) in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients showing inadequate responses to DMARDs and/or TNF inhibitors in clinical practice.

Methods. We observed consecutive 115 RA patients initiating TCZ treatment in Keio University Hospital, dividing them into two groups with (TCZ + MTX group) or without MTX (TCZ group), and evaluated clinical, functional and structural outcomes besides safety at week 52.

Results. Overall mean age, RA duration, and DAS28-ESR were 55.4, 8.4 years, and 5.0, respectively. Proportions of the prior use of TNF inhibitors and concomitant MTX were 45.5% and 57.4%, respectively. Mean dose of concomitant MTX was 8.4 mg/week. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. TCZ improved disease activity measured by DAS28-ESR to 2.1 at week 52 overall, without significant difference between the groups. Clinical (DAS28-ESR < 2.6), functional (HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5), and structural (ΔTSS ≤ 0.5) remission rates in the TCZ group and the TCZ + MTX group were 79.1%/63.8% (P = 0.10), 62.8%/54.4% (P = 0.40), and 70.0%/53.8% (P = 0.61), respectively. Retention rates were 81.0% in the TCZ + MTX group and 88.5% in the TCZ group (P = 0.47). The rate of serious adverse events was comparable between the groups.

Conclusions. TCZ was clinically, functionally, and radiographically effective and safe either with or without low-dose MTX.     

The efficacy and safety of reinstitution of tocilizumab in patients with relapsed active rheumatoid arthritis after long-term withdrawal of tocilizumab: retreatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with novel anti-IL-6 receptor antibody after a long-term interval following SAMURAI: the RONIN study

We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) re-administration in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had previously received TCZ treatment for about 31?months. Four patients whose RA had been well-controlled with 8?mg/kg TCZ treatment every 4?weeks and had withdrawn from the treatment were enrolled. They resumed TCZ treatment after TCZ was authorized for RA treatment in Japan. Disease activity was assessed by the Disease Activity Score 28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and synovitis in the wrists and elbows was measured by ultrasonography at baseline and during follow-up. The mean DAS28-ESR was 6.32 before the first TCZ infusion. After fewer than 20?months of initial TCZ treatment, the mean DAS28-ESR decreased to 1.87. However, after withdrawal of TCZ treatment, the disease activity could not be sufficiently controlled with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or biologic agents. The maximum interval between TCZ treatments was approximately 34?months. Following reinstatement of the TCZ treatment, within 12 months the mean DAS28-ESR improved from 5.21 to 2.87, with the synovitis in the wrists and elbow joints also showing great improvement. These findings demonstrate that TCZ retreatment in active RA patients who had relapsed after long-term discontinuation of TCZ treatment led to an improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA and in synovitis without any severe adverse events.     

Disease activity score 28 may overestimate the remission induction of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab: comparison with the remission by the clinical disease activity index

We evaluated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by the clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and disease activity score (DAS) 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Thirty-two RA patients received 8?mg/kg of TCZ intravenously every 4?weeks for 48?weeks. The therapeutic response was also evaluated in 30 RA patients treated with 3?mg/kg of infliximab (IFX) for 46?weeks. We compared the therapeutic course of TCZ with IFX in order to evaluate the efficacy of TCZ therapy. A strong positive correlation between CDAI and DAS28-ESR was observed at baseline, whereas their associations dropped significantly within the first 2?months. The association recovered to the baseline by IFX, but still remained low in TCZ. Although a decrement of DAS28-ESR was prominent in TCZ as compared with IFX, that of CDAI was significant in the early phase and even in the latter in patients treated by IFX. The present study revealed that DAS28-ESR may not be sufficient to estimate RA disease activity treated by TCZ, probably due to the significant effect toward inhibition of acute phase reactants by TCZ. CDAI is suggested to be an important alternate of composite measure in these cases.     

Efficacy and tolerability of six-week extended dosing interval with tocilizumab therapy in a prospective cohort as remission maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a six-week extended dosing interval with tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained remission.

Methods: Patients who received over six doses of intravenous TCZ in clinical remission (disease activity score [DAS] 28 – erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]?≤?2.6) maintained over 3 months between December 2013 and December 2015 were included. Flare was defined as DAS28-ESR >3.2 at two consecutive visits.

Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled; 87.5% achieved clinical remission at week 54 after six-week extension and 95.5% achieved a van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (ΔmTSS) ≤0.5. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) did not increase during 54 weeks. HAQ-DI at baseline and ΔDAS28-ESR at week six positively correlated with increase in DAS28-ESR at week 54. ΔSwollen joint count at week six positively correlated with ΔmTSS at week 54. A total of 12 adverse events occurring in 10 patients did not lead to cessation of TCZ except for one case of recurrent lymphoproliferative disorder at week five.

Conclusion: A six-week extended dosing interval of TCZ for patients with RA in sustained remission is proposed as an acceptable treatment option for maintaining efficacy and tolerability.     

Assessment of the validity of the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) as a disease activity index of rheumatoid arthritis in the efficacy evaluation of 24-week treatment with tocilizumab: subanalysis of the SATORI study

Abstract

As tocilizumab (TCZ) greatly inhibits inflammatory markers, methods of evaluating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity that include inflammatory markers may overestimate the effect of TCZ treatment. We have evaluated the impact of inflammatory markers on the efficacy of TCZ by comparing the efficacy indicated by the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) with that indicated by the clinical and simplified disease activity indexes (CDAI and SDAI, respectively) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set criteria in a double-blind study of TCZ—the SATORI study. The Spearman correlation coefficient between DAS28-ESR and CDAI was comparable between that at week 24 and that at baseline [correlation coefficient at baseline and week 24 was 0.823 (p < 0.0001) and 0.818 (p < 0.0001), respectively]. A large difference between the DAS28 remission rate and CDAI remission rate was observed at week 24. However, these results are comparable to those of a previous study conducted with non-TCZ-treated patients. Moreover, the same results were obtained in the comparison between the DAS28-ESR and SDAI, even though the SDAI includes an inflammatory parameter as a component. These results confirm that the DAS28-ESR has a validity comparable to that of other methods in terms of evaluating the RA treatment efficacy of TCZ, despite its strong inflammatory marker-inhibiting effects.     

Assessment of the validity of the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) as a disease activity index of rheumatoid arthritis in the efficacy evaluation of 24-week treatment with tocilizumab: subanalysis of the SATORI study

As tocilizumab (TCZ) greatly inhibits inflammatory markers, methods of evaluating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity that include inflammatory markers may overestimate the effect of TCZ treatment. We have evaluated the impact of inflammatory markers on the efficacy of TCZ by comparing the efficacy indicated by the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) with that indicated by the clinical and simplified disease activity indexes (CDAI and SDAI, respectively) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set criteria in a double-blind study of TCZ—the SATORI study. The Spearman correlation coefficient between DAS28-ESR and CDAI was comparable between that at week 24 and that at baseline [correlation coefficient at baseline and week 24 was 0.823 (p < 0.0001) and 0.818 (p < 0.0001), respectively]. A large difference between the DAS28 remission rate and CDAI remission rate was observed at week 24. However, these results are comparable to those of a previous study conducted with non-TCZ-treated patients. Moreover, the same results were obtained in the comparison between the DAS28-ESR and SDAI, even though the SDAI includes an inflammatory parameter as a component. These results confirm that the DAS28-ESR has a validity comparable to that of other methods in terms of evaluating the RA treatment efficacy of TCZ, despite its strong inflammatory marker-inhibiting effects.     

The efficacy and safety of additional administration of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who showed an inadequate response to tocilizumab

Objectives: Tocilizumab (TCZ) shows good retention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but no previous reports demonstrated hopeful treatment options against inadequate response to TCZ. Tacrolimus (TAC) has proved to show efficacy against inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, yet its add-on effects on TCZ remain unknown.

Methods: Twenty patients with RA (17 women, age 58.6 years, disease duration 12.1 years, prior TCZ duration 2.6 years, 18 intravenous [8?mg/kg/month] and 2 subcutaneous [324?mg/month] TCZ treatments, methotrexate 6.1?mg/week [70.0%]) who showed an inadequate response to TCZ (clinical disease activity index [CDAI]?≥?5.8, 18 secondary non-responders) were additionally treated with TAC (1.1?mg/day), and enrolled in this 24-week, prospective study.

Results: Seventeen patients (85.0%) continued the treatment for 24 weeks. Statistically significant decreases in outcome measures were as follows: disease activity score based on 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from 3.3 at baseline to 2.1 at week 24 (p?p?p?Conclusions: Adding low-dose TAC to inadequate responders to TCZ may be a promising complementary treatment option.     

Use and effectiveness of tocilizumab among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for rheumatoid arthritis

The aims of the present study are to describe the characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients selected for tocilizumab (TCZ), compare the “real-world” effectiveness of TCZ and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) when used as a first biologic and assess the influence of past biologic exposure/concurrent methotrexate (MTX) therapy on post-TCZ treatment outcomes. The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-RA) is a prospective cohort study following RA patients starting biologics in the UK. This includes patients starting TCZ as first or subsequent biologic, alongside biologic-naïve patients starting TNFi. Six-month disease activity and 1-year drug survival were compared between biologic-naïve patients starting TCZ versus TNFi and first-line versus subsequent TCZ users and TCZ users with MTX versus without using regression models adjusted by propensity score. Two hundred seventeen patients started TCZ, and 2419 started TNFi as first biologic. Seven hundred seventy-seven started TCZ after other biologics. First-line TCZ users had a higher prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis and cancer history than TNFi users. The first-line TCZ users were more likely to achieve DAS28 remission at 6 months than first-line TNFi, but other improvement markers were similar. The treatment response at 6 months was similar between subsequent-line TCZ users and first-line users after adjusting for baseline patient differences. Concurrent MTX use was not associated with treatment response in either first- or subsequent-line TCZ users. TCZ has been primarily used as subsequent-line biologic in the UK. When used as first line, the response appears similar to that observed in patients starting TNFi, suggesting that clinical response alone should not decide between initial biologic therapies.     

Twenty-four-week clinical results of adalimumab therapy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: retrospective analysis for the best use of adalimumab in daily practice

Abstract

Objective We evaluated patient drug adherence to and efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) based on data collected from approximately 200 patients to retrospectively examine the best use of ADA in Japanese patients with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) managed in daily practice.

Methods For explorative comparisons, patients were stratified by prior use or no use of biologics (Bio-naïve vs. Bio-switch) and concomitant use (+) or no use (?) of methotrexate (MTX) into four subgroups. The primary efficacy endpoint was extent of improvement in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) from baseline to 24 weeks assessed as European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response. Secondary endpoints included ADA treatment continuation as represented by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and percentages of patients achieving remission as defined by DAS28-ESR <2.6.

Results Overall, mean DAS28-ESR significantly decreased from 5.6 ± 1.2 at baseline to 4.1 ± 1.7 at week 24 (p < 0.0001), and >30 % of patients achieved EULAR good response. Subgroup analyses indicated that patients in the Bio-naïve and MTX (+) subgroup showed the highest EULAR good response rate of 37.3 % at week 24. The three most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were skin allergies such as injection-site reactions, infections, and respiratory disorders such as interstitial lung lesions and organizing pneumonia.

Conclusion In conclusion, ADA therapy resulted in significant clinical response in established Japanese patients with RA treated in daily practice. It also demonstrated generally good safety and tolerability. It was suggested that the best use of ADA may be in biologically naïve patients with concomitant administration of MTX.     

Impact of methotrexate dose on efficacy of adalimumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from registered data analyses

Objective: Upper limit of methotrexate (MTX) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was recently increased from 8 to 16?mg/week in Japan. We therefore examined the effect of concomitant MTX dose on the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) in clinical practice.

Method: Sixty-one consecutive RA patients treated with ADA were followed for minimum 52 weeks and retrospectively compared by MTX dose; patients receiving concomitant MTX of 10?mg/week or more (MTX ≥10?mg group) and <10?mg/week (MTX <10?mg group). Disease activity and remission were evaluated by the disease activity score 28 (DAS28) criteria.

Results: The MTX ≥10?mg group consistently showed better improvement in DAS28 and resulted in more patients (52.8%) with DAS28-remission compared with the MTX <10?mg group (26.1%). Multivariate analysis showed that MTX ≥10?mg had a significant effect on DAS28 remission with odds ratio of 5.12. ADA retention rate was 72.2% in MTX ≥10?mg group compared with 52.0% in MTX <10?mg group. Discontinuation of ADA due to adverse events were comparable in the MTX ≥10?mg and MTX <10?mg groups (11.1% vs. 12.0%).

Conclusions: These findings support the critical role of concomitant MTX in the efficacy of ADA, and recommend use of MTX ≥10?mg in Japanese RA patients.     

Efficacy of leflunomide addition in relation to prognostic factors for patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis failing to methotrexate in daily practice

The recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suggest a different therapeutic approach to methotrexate (MTX) resistance according to the presence or absence of poor prognostic factors. Retrospectively, in our patients with active early RA (disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) > 3.2) that failed to respond to initial MTX monotherapy, we investigated whether leflunomide (LEF) addition had a different efficacy when associated with the presence or absence of poor prognostic factors. Of the 20 patients who received LEF, 15 (2 males and 13 females) tolerated the combination. Five patients had no poor prognostic factors, and 4 (80%) of those patients achieved remission or low disease activity (LDA) according to DAS28 and also a good response with the EULAR criteria. Of the 10 patients with at least one poor prognostic factor, remission or LDA occurred in 4 (40%) of the patients, and a good EULAR response was obtained in 3 (30%) of the patients. By Fisher’s exact test, no significant difference was found between the two groups of patients in remission or LDA (p = 0.28) according to DAS28 and a good response (p = 0.12) with the EULAR criteria. In all patients with an inadequate response to the LEF+MTX combination, the substitution of a TNF inhibitor for LEF or the addition of a TNF inhibitor to the combination led to remission or LDA. Large studies are required to investigate the efficacy of LEF addition in relation to prognostic factors in patients with active early RA that did not respond to the initial therapy with MTX alone.     

Shorter disease duration is important for tocilizumab to achieve Boolean remission

Objective

To determine the optimal conditions for inducing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) into disease remission by tocilizumab (TCZ), we analyzed the TCZ therapy carried out in our facility.

Method

The study group comprised 116 patients with RA who started TCZ therapy at Kobe University Hospital and Konan-Kakogawa Hospital. The clinical response to TCZ was evaluated by the 2011 Boolean definition and the disease activity score of 28 joints erythrocyte sedimentation rate 4 (DAS28-ESR4).

Results

After 24 weeks of TCZ therapy, 25.9 % of the patients achieved a Boolean-defined disease remission (Boolean remission). DAS28-ESR4 was improved from 5.25 ± 1.15 at week 0 to 2.75 ± 1.34 at week 24 (mean ± SD, P < 0.0001), and 57.8 % patients achieved DAS28 remission. Analysis of the relationship between disease duration and remission showed that this odds ratio peaked at 3.0 years. Univariate analyses showed that Boolean remission was associated with baseline ESR levels, Steinbrocker’s class and stage, and patient global assessment of disease activity (PGA). Accordingly, we categorized and compared the patient groups referring to the 3.0-year peak. We found significant differences in Steinbrocker’s class and stage.

Conclusion

TCZ therapy leading to Boolean disease remission is optimal when initiated less than 3.0 years after disease onset.