Granulocyte transfusion therapy: update on potential clinical applications

The clinical usefulness of granulocyte transfusions for treatment or prevention of life-threatening bacterial and fungal infections remains controversial. Clinical benefit has long been limited by insufficient donor stimulation regimens and suboptimal leukapheresis techniques. Methodologic progress, in particular mobilization of neutrophils in healthy donors by administration of G-CSF, has significantly enhanced leukapheresis yields. A newly published study indicates that unrelated community donors can be effectively and safely used as an alternative to related family donors. Furthermore, several recent studies suggest that it may be possible to store granulocyte concentrates for 24 to 48 hours with adequate preservation of neutrophil function. This review summarizes the current role of granulocyte transfusion therapy in infectious diseases and highlights important recent advances.     

Clinical applications of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: an update and summary

The discovery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and its potential to regulate neutrophil production and function in the inflammatory process has opened an exciting new era for the supportive care of patients with hematological and malignant diseases. Extensive experience has been gained worldwide with G-CSF therapy, and G-CSF is widely employed clinically, primarily because the safety profile appears to be fairly innocuous. A broad consensus has emerged regarding the clinical utility of G-CSF in neutropenic conditions due to chemotherapy. Furthermore, much interest has focused on the use of G-CSF to mobilize CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells from the marrow to the peripheral blood for use in hematopoietic transplantation. The promising results with G-CSF have promoted further studies, e.g., in immunocompetent patients or in granulocyte transfusion therapy. Here, we review the potential clinical role of G-CSF and describe its future perspectives.     

Granulocyte transfusions in children with chronic granulomatous disease and invasive aspergillosis

The transfusion of granulocytes to restore host defenses in severely granulocytopenic patients or in patients with defective granulocyte functions has been studied for more than 60 years. However, inadequate dosage of cells and inconsistent efficacy has limited the usage of these transfusions. Recently, the use of mobilizing agents such as granulocyte colony stimulating factors and dexamethasone has renewed interest in these treatment modalities. The present study is conducted to determine an appropriate method of enriched granulocyte collection with Fresenius AS.TEC.204 cell separator (Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany) and to evaluate the preliminary clinical results of granulocyte transfusion therapy in patients with chronic granulomatous disease and invasive Aspergillosis in parallel with in vitro granulocyte function. Three patients who have been treated for chronic granulomatous disease and invasive Aspergillosis received a total of 20 granulocyte transfusions. To mobilize granulocytes, healthy donors were given 450 microg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) subcutaneously and 8 mg of dexamethasone orally approximately 12 h before collection. Five microg/kg/day of G-CSF was also subcutaneously administered prior to granulocyte transfusions. The first patient received 4; the second, 14 and the third, 2 transfusions. The granulocyte count given to these patients ranged between 0.4 and 3.0 x 10(9)/kg. Most transfusions were well tolerated. The nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) tests that were done 16-24 h after the transfusion showed 14-46% dye reduction. Two of the three patients survived the infection. Granulocyte transfusions from G-CSF and dexamethasone stimulated donors could be a choice of treatment in chronic granulomatous disease patients, especially with disseminated invasive Aspergillosis.     

Granulocyte transfusion: current status

Infection associated with therapy-related neutropenia continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Renewed interest in granulocyte transfusion therapy as treatment for this condition has been generated by the observation that large doses of granulocytes can be obtained from donors who have been stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Granulocytes collected from these donors have been shown to effectively raise the patient's neutrophil count and appear to function normally as judged both by in vitro and in vivo measures. The evidence for clinical efficacy is limited to that of case reports and small series, and the results are not uniform. Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to determine whether this therapy is useful in either clearing infections or prolonging survival.     

Phase I/II trial of neutrophil transfusions from donors stimulated with G-CSF and dexamethasone for treatment of patients with infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We examined the feasibility of a community blood bank granulocyte transfusion program utilizing community donors stimulated with a single-dose regimen of subcutaneous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus oral dexamethasone. The recipients of these transfusions were neutropenic stem cell transplantation patients with severe bacterial or fungal infection. Nineteen patients received 165 transfusions (mean 8.6 transfusions/patient, range 1-25). Community donors provided 94% of the transfusions; relatives accounted for only 6% of the transfusions. Sixty percent of the community donors initially contacted agreed to participate, and 98% of these individuals indicated willingness to participate again. Transfusion of 81.9 +/- 2.3 x 10(9) neutrophils (mean +/- SD) resulted in a mean 1-hour posttransfusion neutrophil increment of 2. 6 +/- 2.6 x 10(3)/microL and restored the peripheral neutrophil count to the normal range in 17 of the 19 patients. The buccal neutrophil response, a measure of the capacity of neutrophils to migrate to tissue sites in vivo, was restored to normal in most patients following the transfusion. Chills, fever, and arterial oxygen desaturation of >/= 3% occurred in 7% of the transfusions, but these changes were not sufficient to limit therapy. Infection resolved in 8 of 11 patients with invasive bacterial infections or candidemia. These studies indicate that transfusion of neutrophils from donors stimulated with G-CSF plus dexamethasone can restore a severely neutropenic patient's blood neutrophil supply and neutrophil inflammation response. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this therapy.     

The use of G-CSF in normal neutrophil donors

The efficacy of neutrophil transfusion therapy in the treatment of neutropenia-associated infection is most likely dependent on the dose of neutrophils provided. Stimulation of neutrophil donors with G-CSF, with or without corticosteroids, causes marked donor neutrophilia and greatly increases the number of neutrophils collected by leukapheresis. Transfusion of these cells into severely neutropenic patients results in substantial increases in the patient's neutrophil count, levels which are sustained for 24 hours. These cells are capable of migrating to extravascular sites. These transfusion results are in marked contrast to those observed when fewer cells are administered and have led to great enthusiasm for this therapy on the part of many investigators. In spite of these preliminary encouraging results, the determination of clinical efficacy must await the results of large clinical trials.     

Granulocyte transfusion in the G-CSF era

Granulocyte transfusions have been used since the 1960s with varying degrees of clinical success in the treatment of infection in patients with neutropenia or inherited granulocyte disorders. A number of studies have indicated that efficacy may well be associated with the dose of granulocytes delivered. Collection of granulocytes using modern apheresis machines and corticosteroid administration yields approximately 20 to approximately 30 x 10(9) neutrophils, unlikely to be adequate for treating an established infection. The administration of G-CSF to healthy donors has resulted in average granulocyte yields up to 8 x 10(10) cells. Normal or near normal blood neutrophil counts are often attained when these concentrates are transfused to neutropenic recipients, and these levels are sustained for up to 24 h. G-CSF-primed granulocytes appear to be functionally normal by both in vitro and in vivo measurements. Adverse effects experienced by recipients are similar to those seen with traditional doses of granulocytes. G-CSF administration to donors is well tolerated. Controlled clinical trials are needed to determine the therapeutic efficacy of G-CSF-primed granulocyte transfusions.     

Autocrine production of epithelial cell-derived neutrophil attractant-78 induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in neutrophils

Whereas mobilization to inflammatory sites is an important function of neutrophils, it remains to be determined whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulates the mobilization of neutrophils to the inflammatory sites. This study compared the expression of more than 9000 genes in neutrophils treated with and without G-CSF with the use of a DNA microarray system to determine the effects of G-CSF on the function of neutrophils. It was found that messenger RNA expression of epithelial cell-derived neutrophil attractant-78 (ENA-78), which has been reported to be a chemotactic factor for neutrophils, was induced by G-CSF in neutrophils. The study demonstrated that the supernatant of G-CSF-treated neutrophils induced the chemotaxis of neutrophils and that anti-ENA-78 antibody and anti-CXCR-2 antibody inhibited the chemotaxis. These data suggest that G-CSF may enhance the mobilization of neutrophils and consequently augment the accumulation of neutrophils in the inflammatory sites through the secretion of ENA-78.     

Guidelines for safety management of granulocyte transfusion in Japan

Granulocyte transfusion (GTX) has recently been revived by the ability to stimulate granulocyte donors with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), resulting in a greatly increased number of cells that can be collected. However, there is a paucity of guidelines for assessing the appropriateness and safety management of GTX. The objective of this study was to establish guidelines for the safety management of GTX appropriate for the clinical situation in Japan. The Japan Society of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Granulocyte Transfusion Task Force issued the first version of guidelines for GTX considering the safety management of both granulocyte donors and patients who receive GTX therapy. The current guidelines cover issues concerning: (1) the appropriateness of medical institutions, (2) management of granulocyte donors, (3) quality assurance of granulocyte concentrates, (4) administration of granulocyte concentrates, (5) evaluation of the effectiveness of GTX therapy, and (6) complications of GTX therapy. The simple ‘bag separation method’ without apheresis may be recommended for granulocyte collection in pediatric patients. The first version of guidelines for GTX therapy has been established, which may be appropriate for the clinical situation in Japan. Care should be taken to perform the safety management of both granulocyte donors and patients who receive GTX therapy.     

The white cells: use of granulocyte transfusions

Since serious infections are major complications in patients with fewer than 200 phagocytic cells per microliter or in patients with dysfunctional phagocytes, granulocyte transfusions have been used in an attempt to improve clinical outcome. After two decades of trial and clinical use, the role of granulocyte transfusions for therapy of serious infections has not been clearly established. The methods of harvest, storage, and transfusion of granulocytes are acceptable; however, the quantities that are obtained from donors restrict numbers of cells that may be transfused. Limited clinical response has diminished enthusiasm for the use of granulocyte transfusions as therapy, and their use as prophylaxis has been ineffective. Reported clinical data suggest that patients with persisting granulocytopenia with sepsis due to gram-negative bacteria and patients with chronic granulomatous disease with life-threatening infections unresponsive to aggressive antimicrobial therapy may benefit from granulocyte transfusions.     

Pretreatment with phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) inhibitor SF1670 augments the efficacy of granulocyte transfusion in a clinically relevant mouse model

The clinical outcome of granulocyte transfusion therapy is often hampered by short ex vivo shelf life, inefficiency of recruitment to sites of inflammation, and poor pathogen-killing capability of transplanted neutrophils. Here, using a recently developed mouse granulocyte transfusion model, we revealed that the efficacy of granulocyte transfusion can be significantly increased by elevating intracellular phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate signaling with a specific phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) inhibitor SF1670. Neutrophils treated with SF1670 were much sensitive to chemoattractant stimulation. Neutrophil functions, such as phagocytosis, oxidative burst, polarization, and chemotaxis, were augmented after SF1670 treatment. The recruitment of SF1670-pretreated transfused neutrophils to the inflamed peritoneal cavity and lungs was significantly elevated. In addition, transfusion with SF1670-treated neutrophils led to augmented bacteria-killing capability (decreased bacterial burden) in neutropenic recipient mice in both peritonitis and bacterial pneumonia. Consequently, this alleviated the severity of and decreased the mortality of neutropenia-related pneumonia. Together, these observations demonstrate that the innate immune responses can be enhanced and the severity of neutropenia-related infection can be alleviated by augmenting phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate in transfused neutrophils with PTEN inhibitor SF1670, providing a therapeutic strategy for improving the efficacy of granulocyte transfusion.     

Delaying treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for hematological malignancies: a prospective randomized trial.

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been established to improve hematological recovery after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The optimal timing to start with G-CSF has not been determined. This study investigates whether delayed use of G-CSF starting on day 6 is as safe and efficient as starting treatment with G-CSF immediately after BMT. Thirty-eight patients undergoing allogeneic BMT were randomized to either receive post-transplant G-CSF treatment starting at day 1 or at day 6. The time to hematological recovery was monitored and the groups were compared with respect to peritransplant morbidity and mortality. Recovery of the neutrophil granulocyte counts (PMN) to >100/microl, >500/microl and >1000/microl was comparable in both groups. The nadir of the PMN counts after stopping G-CSF was also similar. There was no difference in the recovery of red blood cells and platelet counts and no difference between the two groups with respect to the number of febrile episodes, number of days with antibiotics or number of documented bacterial, fungal or viral infections. Delayed treatment with G-CSF resulted in a reduction of G-CSF treatment from 19 days to 14 days (P = 0.0017). Reducing the length of treatment by 5 days lowered G-CSF treatment costs by 26.3%. Therefore, postponing treatment with G-CSF has no influence on the hematological recovery after allogeneic BMT. There is an economical benefit of postponing G-CSF use without any clinical disadvantages.     

Hematologic effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with malignancy

The effect of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hematologic parameters was evaluated in a phase I clinical study in 18 patients with advanced malignancy. G-CSF was administered once daily as a 30-minute infusion for 14 days; three patients each were treated at increasing dose levels of 1, 3, 10, 30, and 60 micrograms kg-1 day-1. A transient decrease in neutrophil and monocyte counts was observed immediately after the G-CSF infusion, followed by a dose-dependent increase of up to 15-fold. G-CSF-induced neutrophils exhibited an increased O2- radical production, and serum levels of enzymes related to granulocyte turnover, including lysozyme and elastase, were markedly elevated during therapy. A dose-dependent depression of platelet counts occurred in the second third of the treatment course, followed by a spontaneous recovery despite continuing therapy. G-CSF was well-tolerated; minor to moderate bone pain was the most common side effect. The primary course of the malignant diseases studied was not significantly altered. G-CSF appears to be an appropriate means to selectively increase the number of functionally competent polymorphonuclear phagocytes.     

CD34+ dose-driven administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy in lymphoma patients

Our goal was to optimize use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation in lymphoma patients, limiting G-CSF administration to patients infusing a suboptimal CD34(+) cell number. Of 124 consecutive patients with histologically proven Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from January 2001 to June 2004, 60 patients (group 1) given > or = 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells received no G-CSF; 64 patients (group 2) given < or = 5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells received G-CSF from day +5 after stem-cell reinfusion. The median times to reach 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 1.0 x 10(9)/L neutrophils were, respectively, 3 and 4 d shorter in G-CSF group and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0014; P = 0.0001). In terms of antibiotic and antimycotic requirements, gastrointestinal toxicity, days of hospitalization, and transfusion requirements, no differences were demonstrated between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated for the total number of febrile episodes (52 for group 1; 53 for group 2; P = 0.623) and the median number of febrile days (2 d for both groups). Myeloid reconstitution values for both groups agree with published results for autotransplanted patients treated with G-CSF from 7 to 14 d. Also, major clinical events, antibiotic, antimycotic, and transfusion requirements, and hospital stay were similar to published findings. Our data suggest that G-CSF administration can be safely optimized, used only for patients infused with a suboptimal CD34(+) cell dose.     

Hämatopoetische Wachstumsfaktoren

The production of hematopoietic cells is under the tight control of distinct growth factors. As therapeutic agents, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), erythropoietin (EPO), and thrombopoiesis-stimulating agents (TSA) are in routine clinical use. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is used to prevent febrile neutropenia or to increase dose-density in chemotherapy regimens. Despite a reduced duration of neutropenia, randomized controlled trials have documented only a modest clinical benefit. A clinical advantage of dose-dense chemotherapy has been shown only in specific chemotherapy regimens. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of G-CSF for patients with a high risk of adverse outcome of febrile neutropenia. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are used as an alternative to blood transfusion in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. However, recent meta-analyses of clinical studies suggest that their use was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Thrombopoiesis-stimulating agents have been introduced recently into the market for patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Prior to the use of TSA in other conditions such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia the lessons learned with G-CSF and ESAs should be taken into account.     

Retroviral transduction efficiency of G-CSF+SCF-mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ cells is superior to G-CSF or G-CSF+Flt3-L-mobilized cells in nonhuman primates

Gene transfer experiments in nonhuman primates have been shown to be predictive of success in human clinical gene therapy trials. In most nonhuman primate studies, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) collected from the peripheral blood or bone marrow after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) + stem cell factor (SCF) have been used as targets, but this cytokine combination is not generally available for clinical use, and the optimum target cell population has not been systematically studied. In our current study we tested the retroviral transduction efficiency of rhesus macaque peripheral blood CD34(+) cells collected after administration of different cytokine mobilization regimens, directly comparing G-CSF+SCF versus G-CSF alone or G-CSF+Flt3-L in competitive repopulation assays. Vector supernatant was added daily for 96 hours in the presence of stimulatory cytokines. The transduction efficiency of HSCs as assessed by in vitro colony-forming assays was equivalent in all 5 animals tested, but the in vivo levels of mononuclear cell and granulocyte marking was higher at all time points derived from target CD34(+) cells collected after G-CSF+SCF mobilization compared with target cells collected after G-CSF (n = 3) or G-CSF+Flt3-L (n = 2) mobilization. In 3 of the animals long-term marking levels of 5% to 25% were achieved, but originating only from the G-CSF+SCF-mobilized target cells. Transduction efficiency of HSCs collected by different mobilization regimens can vary significantly and is superior with G-CSF+SCF administration. The difference in transduction efficiency of HSCs collected from different sources should be considered whenever planning clinical gene therapy trials and should preferably be tested directly in comparative studies.     

Granulocyte transfusion in the G-CSF era

Granulocyte transfusions have been used since the 1960s with varying degrees of clinical success in the treatment of infection in patients with neutropenia or inherited granulocyte disorders. A number of studies have indicated that efficacy may well be associated with the dose of granulocytes delivered. Collection of granulocytes using modern apheresis machines and corticosteroid administration yields approximately 20～30×10⁹ neutrophils, unlikely to be adequate for treating an established infection. The administration of G-CSF to healthy donors has resulted in average granulocyte yields up to 8×10¹⁰ cells. Normal or near normal blood neutrophil counts are often attained when these concentrates are transfused to neutropenic recipients, and these levels are sustained for up to 24 h. G-CSF-primed granulocytes appear to be functionally normal by both in vitro and in vivo measurements. Adverse effects experienced by recipients are similar to those seen with traditional doses of granulocytes. G-CSF administration to donors is well tolerated. Controlled clinical trials are needed to determine the therapeutic efficacy of G-CSF-primed granulocyte transfusions.     

Sweet's syndrome in patient with refractory anemia during recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy]

We present a patient with refractory anemia (RA) who developed Sweet's syndrome during the treatment of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). A 30-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for evaluation of anemia. He was diagnosed as MDS (RA). As a phase II study in MDS, rhG-CSF therapy was begun. Fever associated with cutaneous lesion developed over the left shoulder. Antibiotics showed no effects. Skin biopsy revealed Sweet's syndrome. This skin lesion disappeared thoroughly with discontinuance of G-CSF and administration of prednisolone. To examine whether Sweet's syndrome was related to the G-CSF therapy, we analyzed the effect of G-CSF on the function of patient's neutrophils. However, the function of patient's neutrophils was not activated by G-CSF administration.     

G-CSF and IL-8 but not GM-CSF correlate with severity of pulmonary neutrophilia in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Activated neutrophils play a major role in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and persistence of pulmonary neutrophilia is related to poor survival. Interleukin (IL)-8 is implicated in recruiting neutrophils to the lungs but it has been postulated that granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which can promote the survival of neutrophils by delaying apoptosis, may prolong the inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to investigate the levels of GM-CSF and G-CSF in the lungs of patients with ARDS and determine their relationship relative to IL-8 with levels of neutrophils and clinical outcome. The lungs of 31 patients with ARDS were sampled by means of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and assays of the three cytokines were conducted via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. GM-CSF, G-CSF and IL-8 were all increased in the patients compared to healthy controls but concentrations of GM-CSF were much lower than those of G-CSF and IL-8 (GM-CSF相似文献   

Therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in systemic lupus erythematosus may be associated with severe flares

OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used for treatment of febrile neutropenia in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other systemic rheumatic diseases. We describe 2 patients with SLE with disease flares with irreversible loss of renal function in association with G-CSF therapy. Eighteen patients with SLE treated with G-CSF for neutropenia have been reported, of whom 4 developed mild disease flares or cutaneous vasculitis. Our experience suggests that G-CSF therapy should be used with considerable caution in patients with SLE.