手助腹腔镜脾切除与开腹脾切除对机体术后免疫功能影响的比较

目的研究手助腹腔镜脾切除术和开腹脾切除对机体免疫功能的影响,考察该术式的临床价值。方法16例肝硬化脾亢患者随机分为手助腹腔镜脾切除组和开腹脾切除组,比较两组病例术前、术后1d、3d、7d外周血淋巴细胞亚群的变化。结果开腹组术后1d、3d、7d的成熟淋巴细胞(CD3)、辅助淋巴细胞(CD4)及CD4与抑制性T淋巴细胞(CD8)的比值与术前相比明显下降(P<0.05或P<0.01)。而腹腔镜组术后1d、3d、7d的CD3、CD4、CD4/CD8与术前相比没有显著差异(P>0.05)。结论手助腹腔镜脾切除术结合了微创外科和传统开腹手术的优点,具有安全、创伤小、恢复快的特点,具有很好的临床应用价值和前景。     

腹腔镜胃大部切除术对机体免疫功能的影响

目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹胃大部切除术对机体免疫功能的影响。方法:选择40例有胃大部切除指征的患者,分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,各20例,测定免疫球蛋白IgG、IgM、IgA,补体C3、C4水平及测定、组间比较CD3+(T细胞总数)、CD4+(T辅助/诱导细胞)、CD8+(T抑制/杀伤细胞)的数量。结果:两组IgM、IgA、C4手术前后均无明显变化,组间无统计学差异。腹腔镜组术后1d IgG、C3较术前有所下降,术后3d恢复至术前水平。开腹组IgG、C3术后1d明显低于术前水平,术后5d恢复至术前水平。腹腔镜组淋巴细胞亚群手术前后均无统计学差异,开腹组术后1d CD3+、CD4+、CD8+与术前比较均明显降低,术后5d恢复至术前水平。结论:腹腔镜对机体免疫功能的影响小,术后恢复较快。     

腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术对免疫功能影响的比较

目的比较腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术对机体免疫功能的影响。方法选择44例有子宫切除指征的患者,分为2组:腹腔镜治疗25例(腹腔镜组),接受开放手术19例(开腹组)。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后镇痛用药、术后住院时间情况;并采用散射比浊法测定免疫球蛋白IgG、IgM、IgA,补体C3、C4水平,采用流式细胞仪测定CD3+(T细胞总数)、CD4+(T辅助/诱导细胞)、CD8+(T抑制/杀伤细胞)的数量,进行组间比较。结果两组手术时间(100.5±15.9 m invs 97.0±17.9 m in)无显著性差异(t=0.685,P=0.497),腹腔镜组术中出血量(65.0±48.9 m l vs 150.0±100.4 m l)、术后镇痛率(3/25 vs 16/19)及术后住院时间(5.4±1.3 d vs 7.4±1.5 d)明显小于开腹组(t=-3.703,2χ=22.943,t=-4.730;P=0.000)。两组IgM、IgA、C4手术前后均无明显变化,两组间亦无显著差异。腹腔镜组术后1 d IgG较术前有所下降,术后3 d恢复至术前水平,C3无明显变化;开腹组IgG、C3术后1 d明显低于术前水平,术后3 d恢复到术前水平。两组比较,开腹组术后1 d IgG、C3下降明显。腹腔镜组T淋巴细胞亚群手术前后均无显著性差异。开腹组术后1、3 d CD3+、CD4+、CD8+与术前比较均明显降低,术后5 d恢复至术前水平;两组比较,术后1、3 d开腹组CD3+、CD4+、CD8+均明显低于腹腔镜组。结论腹腔镜对机体免疫功能的影响小,为术后恢复较快提供了病理生理学依据。     

腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开放性胃癌根治术的对比研究

目的 比较胃癌患者开腹手术与腹腔镜手术的疗效的差异.方法选择胃癌患者98例,随机均分为开腹手术组和腹腔镜组,记录两组患者手术情况,比较两组术后的情况,检测术前、术后4天T淋巴细胞亚群CD4/CD8水平以及免疫球蛋白IgG的表达.结果腹腔镜组患者两组患者在术中出血量、手术时间、自主下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、尿管拔除时间、住院时间等方面均优于开腹手术组.腹腔镜组术后4天外周血CD4/CD8水平及免疫球蛋白IgG水平同开腹手术组相比差异有统计学意义.结论腹腔镜下行胃癌切除术对机体的短期影响较小,同时,对机体的体液免疫与细胞免疫功能影响轻微,利于机体的恢复.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术对机体免疫功能的影响

目的：比较腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术对机体免疫功能的影响。方法：随机将有胆囊切除手术指征的80例患者分为2组,腹腔镜胆囊切除组（laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC组）和开腹胆囊切除组（open cholecystectomy,OC组）各40例,测定并比较手术前后IgG、IgM、IgA,补体C3、C4水平及CD3^＋（T细胞总数）、CD4^＋（T辅助/诱导细胞）和CD8^＋的数量。结果：两组IgM、IgA、C4手术前后均无明显变化,两组间差异无统计学意义。LC组术后1d IgG、C3较术前有所下降,术后3d恢复至术前水平;OC组术后1d IgG、C3明显低于术前水平,术后5d恢复至术前水平;组间比较,OC组术后IgG、C3下降明显。LC组T淋巴细胞亚群手术前后差异无统计学意义,OC组术后1d CD3^＋、CD4^＋、CD8^＋与术前比较明显降低,术后5d恢复至术前水平;组间比较,术后1d、3d OC组CD3^＋、CD4^＋、CD8^＋均明显低于LC组。结论：腹腔镜手术对机体的免疫功能影响小,术后恢复快。     

腹腔镜与开腹肝癌左外叶切除术对患者围术期指标、免疫功能及术后康复的影响

目的观察腹腔镜与开腹肝癌左外叶切除术对患者围术期指标、免疫功能及术后康复的影响。方法回顾性分析2014年1月～2019年3月于本院行左外叶肝癌切除术患者临床资料,经倾向性匹配后得到腔镜组(行腹腔镜肝左外叶切除术)与开腹组(行开腹肝左外叶切除术)各46例,比较两组围术期指标,分析两组术前1d、术后第1天、术后第3天细胞免疫淋巴细胞亚群(CD3、CD19、NK、CD4/CD8)及体液免疫免疫球蛋白(IgG、IgA、IgM)变化,同时对比两组术后康复情况及并发症发生情况。结果腔镜组手术切口长度、术中失血量及术后镇痛药使用时间均显著低于开腹组(P0.05);两组术后第1天细胞免疫指标(CD3、CD19、NK、CD4/CD8)、体液免疫指标(IgA、IgM、IgG)均显著低于术前1d(P0.05),术后第3天,两组上述指标均有回升趋势,但腔镜组CD3、CD19、NK、CD4/CD8及血清IgA、IgM、IgG水平均显著高于开腹组(P0.05);腔镜组术后疼痛评分、术后首次排气时间、首次下床活动时间、首次进食流食时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间及术后住院时间均显著低于开腹组(P0.05);腔镜组术后并发症总发生率10.87%,显著低于开腹组的30.43%(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜肝癌左外叶切除术相较传统开腹手术而言,能减轻患者创伤,降低手术对患者免疫功能的影响,利于术后恢复,同时减少并发症发生几率。     

手助腹腔镜脾切除与开腹脾切除治疗巨脾效果比较

比较手助腹腔镜脾切除与开腹脾切除治疗巨脾的效果。回顾性分析41例因巨脾行脾脏切除术的临床资料。手助腹腔镜脾切除术患者23例,开腹脾切除术患者18例。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后平均住院时间、术后并发症发生率。结果显示,与开腹脾切除术相比,手助腹腔镜脾切除的手术时间长[(313+41.8)min vs(209+19.9)min,P=0.01]、术中出血量少[(324±54.8)ml vs(539±154.8)mL,P=0.01]、术后并发症少(P=0.004)、术后平均住院时间短[(6±1.2)d vs(9±1.4)d,P=0.01]。结果表明,与开腹脾切除术相比,手助腹腔镜脾切除的手术出血量少,术后并发症发生率低,术后住院时间更短,但手术时间长。     

腹腔镜肝切除术患者细胞免疫功能的变化

目的 探讨腹腔镜下肝切除术对机体细胞免疫功能的影响。方法 选择15例ASAⅡ-Ⅲ级择期行腹腔镜下肝切除术的患者(LH组),观察其术前、术后第1天、术后第3天的外周血淋巴细胞亚群及IL-6和TNF-α的变化,并与同期15例开腹肝切除术患者(OH组)进行对比。结果 两组患者术后第1天成熟T淋巴细胞(CD3 )、辅助T淋巴细胞(CD4 )、抑制性T淋巴细胞(CD8 )较术前均有不同程度的降低(P<0.05),而IL-6、TNF-α较术前升高(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。术后第3天LH组患者的CD3 、CD4 、CD8 以及IL-6、TNF-α基本上恢复至术前水平,而OH组患者CO3 、CD4 、CD8 仍低于术前、IL-6、TNF-α高于术前,组间比较差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论 与开腹肝切除术相比,腹腔镜下肝切除术对患者细胞免疫功能影响轻且恢复快。     

腹腔镜辅助与开腹进展期胃癌根治术对机体免疫功能影响的比较

目的:腹腔镜辅助下与开腹行进展期胃癌根治术对机体免疫功能的影响.方法:将94例进展期胃癌患者按意愿分为腹腔镜组(n=47)与开腹组(n=47),测定2组术前及术后第3、7、14天患者血清IL-6、CRP、IgG、IgM、IgA、CD3+、CD4+,CD8+,CD4+/CD8+、人类白细胞抗原Ⅱ型(HLA-DR)、中性粒细胞(PMN)的数量.结果:2组术后第3天免疫球蛋白较术前均降低(P<0.05),开腹组术后第7天免疫球蛋白较术前低(P<0.05),腹腔镜组术后第7天免疫球蛋白较术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),除术后第3、7天IgM腹腔镜组高于开腹组(P<0.05),2组间IgA、IgG术后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组术后第3、7天2组IL-6、CRP较术前明显升高(P<0.01),开腹组升高较腹腔镜组更明显(P<0.01);术后第3、7、14天腹腔镜组HLA-DR较术前明显升高(P<0.01),2组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01,表5);2组术后第3天PMN较术前明显升高(P<0.01);2组外周血CD3+、CD4+,CD4+/CD8+术后第7、14天较术前均明显下降(P<0.01),术后腹腔镜组明显高于开腹组(P<0.01),且腹腔镜组较早恢复正常.结论:与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术对机体术后的免疫功能影响小,术后恢复快.     

门脉高压症患者脾切除术后免疫功能的改变及其与脾组织免疫细胞的关系

目的　研究门脉高压症脾亢患者脾切除前后免疫功能的改变 ,以及巨脾组织免疫活性细胞的数量变化。探讨门脉高压症脾亢患者脾脏切除术合理性的免疫学基础。方法　对门脉高压症脾切除术患者 ,术前检测静脉血T淋巴细胞亚群 (CD3 、CD4 、CD8 、CD2 0 )及NK细胞 ;白介素 2(IL 2 )和白介素 10 (IL 10 ) ;γ干扰素 (IFN γ) ;免疫球蛋白 (IgG、IgM、IgA)及补体C3、C4。脾切除术后 1周、1月再次检测上述指标。切除的巨脾组织制成石蜡切片 ,检测CD3 、CD8 、CD2 0 、CD6 8 阳性细胞数量及分布 ,与正常脾组织进行比较。结果　①脾切除术后 1月免疫球蛋白IgG、补体C3、C4均升高 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,IgM、IgA呈增高趋势 ,但无统计学意义。②脾切除术后 1月IL 2、IFN γ明显升高 ,但仍低于正常人 ;IL 10明显降低 ,但仍高于正常人。③脾切除手术前后外周血CD4 、CD8 、CD4 /CD8 、CD2 0 细胞变化均无统计学意义。仅CD3 、NK细胞术后 1月明显升高 (P <0 .0 1)。④门静脉高压症巨脾与正常脾脏比较 ,CD3 、CD8 、CD2 0 、CD6 8 细胞数均减少。结论　经部分免疫学指标检测 ,门脉高压症脾亢患者免疫功能降低 ,脾切除术能使门脉高压症患者免疫功能得到一定改善。     

腹腔镜脾切除与开腹脾切除的疗效观察

目的探讨腹腔镜脾切除治疗非外伤性脾肿大的可行性与安全性。方法选取我院2009年1月至2013年6月因非外伤性脾肿大而进行脾切除的患者40例,其中22例行腹腔镜脾切除术为腹腔镜(LS)组,18例行传统开腹的脾切除术作为开腹组(OS),观察两组围手术期的相关指标,并进行对比分析。结果LS组中2例(9.1%)患者因术中出血而中转开腹,6例患者于腔镜下同时行门奇静脉断流术,4例患者于腔镜下同时行胆囊切除术。OS组中7例患者同时行门奇静脉断流术,3例患者同时行胆囊切除术。两组患者的脾重量、体积以及长度均无统计学意义(P值>0.05)。LS组的平均手术时间长于OS组,但LS组术中失血量和术中输血的例数均也少于OS组,差异均有统计学意义(P值<0.05)。LS组术后平均住院时间为7.6±1.8(d),小于OS组的10.1±2.1(d),差异有统计学意义(P值<0.01)。LS组术后并发症率为18.2%,要低于OS组的38.9%(P<0.05),两组均无死亡病例。结论腹腔镜脾切除术治疗非外伤性脾肿大是安全可行的。     

腹腔镜肝癌切除术联合脾脏切除对肝癌合并脾功能亢进的早期效果分析

目的探讨腹腔镜肝癌切除术联合脾脏切除对肝癌合并脾功能亢进的早期疗效。 方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年5月接受腹腔镜手术治疗的54例肝癌合并脾功能亢进患者临床资料。将肝癌切除同时行脾脏切除者纳入切脾组(25例),仅行肝癌切除术保留脾脏者纳入保脾组(29例)。临床数据使用统计学软件SPSS 24.0分析,术中术后各项指标、肝功能及免疫指标采用( ±s)表示,独立样本t检验;术后并发症等组间比较采用χ²检验。P<0.05为检验标准。 结果两组患者均成功完成手术,无中转开腹。切脾组手术时间明显较保脾组更长(P＝0.003),术中出血量及术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1周,两组患者外周血WBC、PLT均较术前明显升高,且切脾组显著高于保脾组(P<0.05);两组患者肝功能指标ALT、AST、Tbil均较术前明显升高,保脾组较切脾组更高(P<0.05);术后免疫功能指标切脾组CD4、CD4/CD8显著升高,而CD8显著降低,且明显优于保脾组(P<0.05)。切脾组及保脾组患者早期并发症发生率分别为16.0%及17.2%,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论腹腔镜肝癌切除联合脾脏切除治疗肝癌合并脾功能亢进安全可行,降低了手术创伤,早期疗效满意。     

外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜与开腹脾切除临床研究

【摘要】〓目的〓对比腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)与开腹脾切除术(OS)在外伤性脾破裂治疗的临床疗效,探讨LS的可行性、安全性。方法〓将45例外伤性脾破裂患者根据手术方式分为腹腔镜组(LS组)和开腹组(OS组)。LS组18例,OS组27例,比较2种术式的手术时间、手术出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间以及并发症发生率。结果〓LS组的平均手术时间与OS组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),手术出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间以及并发症发生率均优于OS组。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论〓腹腔镜脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂的临床疗效优于传统开腹手术,在临床上是可行、安全有效的。     

Refining the selection criteria for laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic splenectomy is considered the procedure of choice for patients with normal-sized spleens, the benefits are less clear in the presence of splenomegaly, which represents a heterogeneous patient population with a variety of underlying diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic (LS) and open splenectomy (OS) for spleens between 15 and 25 cm in length in order to identify strategies for patient selection for the laparoscopic approach. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of concurrent patients undergoing splenectomy for splenomegaly (>15 cm in the long axis) from 2000 to 2005 were reviewed at two hospitals. At one hospital, LS was performed unless the spleen was >25 cm in length, while the other hospital used OS exclusively. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared for patients potentially eligible for LS. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) and were analyzed by using nonparametric tests. A value P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sixty-five laparoscopic and 25 open splenectomies were performed at the two hospitals, of which 34 were for splenomegaly. Five open cases involved spleens >25 cm and were excluded, leaving 18 LS (13 hand assisted) and 11 OS for further analysis. The groups were similar in comorbidity score, spleen length, hematologic diagnosis, and intraoperative blood loss. The open group was younger, included more females, and had a shorter operative time. Time to oral intake (1 vs. 2 days; P = 0.04) and length of hospital stay (3 vs. 6 days; P = 0.01) were shorter in the LS group. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 (39%) LS and 6 (55%) OS patients (P = 0.47); these were major in 3 LS patients and 1 OS patient (P = 1.0). All 3 major complications after LS occurred in the 3 patients with myelofibrosis and involved a conversion or reoperation by laparotomy for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy confers benefit for most patients with splenomegaly between 15 and 25 cm, as it is associated with faster time to oral intake and a shorter hospital stay. Major morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy was mostly related to surgery for myelofibrosis. These patients did not derive any benefit from the laparoscopic approach due to bleeding complications, requiring a conversion or relaparotomy.     

Experience of laparoscopy application in the treatment of the patients, suffering hematological diseases in Latvia

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is performed on stages of treatment of various benign and malignant hematological diseases. Retrospective investigation was done, in whom 129 patients were included, which were operated on in 2002-2010 yrs in "Linazers" clinic for benign and malignant hematological diseases. In 107 (82.94%) of them open splenectomy (OS) was performed and in 22 (17.06%)--LS. Trustworthy differences of the age median were established in patients, in whom OS and LS were performed, the spleen size before the operation have constituted 19 cm in OS group and 12,4 cm--in LS group. LS is affordable and safe, in comparison with OS, as operative procedure option for patients of younger age with a normal spleen. For more complete estimation of LS application in hematological diseases it is necessary to prolong a work on creation of a data base of operations, performed on spleen.     

Introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura

AIM OF THE STUDY: Was to evaluate retrospectively the outcomes and efficacy of the laparoscopic splenectomies for ITP patients, performed at our institution over a period of 7 years and to compare these results with those after open splenectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed data of 22 consecutive adult patients with ITP who underwent either laparoscopic (LS gr., n = 9) or open (OS gr., n = 13) splenectomy at Hospital of Kaunas University of Medicine between the years 1996 and 2002. The indications for splenectomy in these patients were unsuccessful treatment with corticosteroids or other medications and/or the requirement of high dosages of steroids for prolonged periods of time to maintain platelet count > 50 G/L before operation. Prior to surgery, all patients were treated with corticosteroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin to raise the platelet count and to minimize the risk of intraoperative bleeding. The efficacy of the operation was evaluated by counting platelets one day before surgery and on the first and fifth postoperative day. Data chosen for analysis included age, gender, weight, height, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, number of converted patients, estimated blood loss during operation, operating time, postoperative secretion through the drains, morbidity, mortality and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between LS and OS groups according patients age, weight, height, gender and ASA score. The mean operative time was 138.8 +/- 50.1 min in LS group and was significantly longer than operative time in OS group (102.3 +/- 21.3 min). One patient was converted to open splenectomy because of severe bleeding from splenic hilum. Postoperative complications occurred in one patient from each group. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 460 +/- 125 ml in LS group and 510 +/- 140 ml in OS group (p > 0.05). Postoperative secretion through the drains and postoperative secretion time in LS group was significantly lower and shorter than in OS group. Postoperative hospital stay in LS group (5 +/- 1.1 days) was significantly shorter than in OS group (8 +/- 1.4 days). After splenectomy, there was an immediate increase in the platelet count of all patients in both groups. Between the day before surgery and the first postoperative day, the mean platelet count rose significantly from 75 +/- 57.0 G/L to 117 +/- 84.2 G/L in LS group and from 64 +/- 60.1 G/L to 122 +/- 79.3 G/L in OS group. Between the first postoperative day and the fifth postoperative day, the mean platelet count also rose significantly in both groups: from 117 +/- 84.2 G/L to 259 +/- 151.0 G/L in LS group and from 122 +/- 79.3 G/L to 258 +/- 158.4 G/L in OS group. In the immediate postoperative period (five days after operation), all LS group and OS group patients responded to the splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic or open splenectomy are equally efficacious in patients with ITP, with an immediate response rate of 100 % in our study. Our study results show that open splenectomy appears superior to laparoscopic procedure in terms of shorter operative time. Laparoscopic splenectomy appears superior to open procedure in terms of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative drainage time, less postoperative secretion through the drains. These two approaches are similar with regard to blood loss during operations and the rate of postoperative complications.     

腹腔镜手术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔对机体炎症反应及免疫功能的影响

目的 探讨腹腔镜手术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔对机体炎症反应及免疫功能的影响,进一步评价腹腔镜穿孔修补术的微创效果.方法 将81例消化性溃疡穿孔患者随机分为腹腔镜手术组（腹腔镜组,37例）和开腹手术组（开腹组,44例）,比较两组患者围手术期外周血降钙素原（PCT）、C反应蛋白（CRP）及T淋巴细胞亚群（CD4、CD8、CD4/CD8比值）变化.结果 术后第1天、第3天两组的PCT、CRP均较术前显著升高（P＜0.05）.术后第5天腹腔镜组的PCT、CRP水平与术前比较,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.术后开腹组的PCT、CRP水平均显著高于腹腔镜组（P＜0.05）.两组术后第1天CD4、CD8水平及CD4/CD8比值均较术前显著下降（P＜0.05）,但术后腹腔镜组CD4、CD8水平及CD4/CD8比例明显高于开腹组（P＜0.05）,且腹腔镜组CD4、CD8水平及CD4/CD8比值均于术后第5天恢复至术前水平（P＞0.05）.结论 与开腹穿孔修补术相比较,腹腔镜穿孔修补术能够有效降低术后炎症反应的程度,且对机体的免疫功能影响更小,具有功能学微创优势.     

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in children

BACKGROUND: The authors have reviewed their initial experience with laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) to identify the indications, success rate, and complications associated with this procedure compared with a series of children undergoing open splenectomy (OS) during the same time period. METHODS: The records of 51 children who underwent splenectomy from 1993 through 1998 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients aged 1 to 17 years (mean, 9.4 years) underwent LS for the following indications: ITP (n = 20), sickle cell disease or thalassemia (n = 6), hereditary spherocytosis (n = 5), other hematologic disorders (n = 4). Seventeen patients aged 2 to 17 years (mean, 11.8 years) underwent OS during the same time period for ITP (n = 4), sickle cell disease or thalassemia (n = 4), hereditary spherocytosis (n = 5), and other indications (n = 4). Concomitant cholecystectomy was performed in 4 of 35 LS and 4 of 17 OS. Accessory spleens were identified in 10 of 35 LS and 2 of 17 OS cases. Eleven spleens were enlarged in the LS group, and 8 were enlarged in the OS group. One LS required conversion to an open procedure because the spleen did not fit in the bag. No other cases were converted. Median estimated blood loss was 50 mL for both the LS and OS groups. The only intraoperative complication in the LS group was a splenic capsular tear, which had no effect on the successful laparoscopic removal of the spleen. No patient in either group required a blood transfusion. The LS patients had a shorter length of hospital stay (1.8 +/- 1 versus 4.0 +/- 1 day, P = .0001). Total hospital charges were not significantly different. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 40 months. One LS patient died 47 days postoperatively from unrelated causes. Two LS patients had recurrent ITP; accessory spleens were found in one and resected laparoscopically. CONCLUSION: LS in children can be performed safely with a low conversion rate (2.9%) and is associated with a shorter hospital stay and comparable total hospital cost when compared with OS.     

腹腔镜脾切除术治疗巨脾症的临床疗效及其对病人应激反应的影响

目的探讨腹腔镜脾切除术治疗巨脾症的临床疗效及其对病人应激反应的影响。方法将汉川市人民医院2013年1月至2016年6月收治的38例巨脾症病人作为临床研究对象,根据其治疗方式,将19例行腹腔镜脾切除术(laparoscopic splenectomy,LS)病人纳入LS组,19例行开腹脾切除术(open splenectomy,OS)病人纳入OS组,记录两组病人手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、肠功能恢复时间、住院时间及术后并发症发生情况,并检测两组病人术前1 d、术后1 d及7 d C反应蛋白(C-reactive protem,CRP)、降钙素原(procalcitonin,PCT)、白细胞介素6(interleukin-6,IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)等应激反应指标并观察其变化,给予统计学分析后得出结论。结果除手术时间外,在手术切口长度、术中出血量、住院时间、肠道功能恢复时间、术后并发症发生率等比较中,LS组均优于OS组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。在应激反应指标方面,两组病人术后1 d CRP、PCT、IL-6、TNF-α均明显升高,术后7d均明显降低,但两组病人之间比较,LS组术前1d与OS组差异无统计学意义,术后1 d、7 d均明显低于OS组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论在巨脾症的临床治疗中,LS对病人术中侵袭度小,术后恢复快,对病人应激反应影响小,术后并发症少。